SENTENCED TO DEATH

The fullest account of the trial was that given in M. de Leval’s report

to Mr. Whitlock. It was as follows:

“Miss Cavell was prosecuted for having helped English and French

soldiers, as well as Belgian young men, to cross the frontier and to

go over to England. She had admitted by signing a statement before

the day of the trial, and by public acknowledgment in Court, in the

presence of all the other prisoners and the lawyers, that she was

guilty of the charges brought against her, and she had acknowledged

not only that she had helped these soldiers to cross the frontier, but

also that some of them had thanked her in writing when arriving in

England. This last admission made her case so much the more serious,

because if it only had been proved against her that she had helped the

soldiers to traverse the Dutch frontier, and no proof was produced

that these soldiers had reached a country at war with Germany, she

could only have been sentenced for an attempt to commit the ‘crime’

and not for the ‘crime’ being duly accomplished. As the case stood the

sentence fixed by the German military law was a sentence of death.

“Paragraph 58 of the German Military Code says:

“‘Will be sentenced to death for treason any person who, with the

intention of helping the hostile Power, or of causing harm to the

German or allied troops, is guilty of one of the crimes of paragraph

90 of the German Penal Code.’

“The case referred to in above said paragraph 90 consists in—

“... conducting soldiers to the enemy....’

“The penalties above set forth apply, according to paragraph 160 of

the German Code, in case of war, to foreigners as well as to Germans.

“In her oral statement before the Court Miss Cavell disclosed almost

all the facts of the whole prosecution. She was questioned in German,

an interpreter translating all the questions in French, with which

language Miss Cavell was well acquainted. She spoke without trembling

and showed a clear mind. Often she added some greater precision to her

previous depositions.

“When she was asked why she helped these soldiers to go to England,

she replied that she thought that if she had not done so they would

have been shot by the Germans, and that therefore she thought she only

did her duty to her country in saving their lives.

“The Military Public Prosecutor said that argument might be good for

English soldiers, but did not apply to Belgian young men whom she

induced to cross the frontier, and who would have been perfectly free

to remain in the country without danger to their lives.

“Mr. Kirschen made a very good plea for Miss Cavell, using all

arguments that could be brought in her favor before the Court.

“The Military Public Prosecutor, however, asked the Court to pass a

death sentence on Miss Cavell and eight other prisoners among the

thirty-five. The Court did not seem to agree, and the judgment was

postponed.”

Deeds of heroism and bravery · 第 371 / 699 题