DISCUSSION.

The chairman said that there was little doubt but that further

investigation into electrolytic methods of chemical analysis would

give even more valuable results than those already obtained.

Systematic investigations of the subject, such as have been given by

Dr. Kohn, would go far to prove the adaptability of this method as a

substitute for or aid in ordinary qualitative examinations. The

remarks of Dr. Kohn respecting quantitative examinations were very

interesting, and well worth following up by other practical work.

Professor Campbell Brown said that Dr. Kohn had shown that electricity

brought the same kind of elegance, neatness, and simplicity into

analysis that it did into lighting and silver plating.

In its applications to the detection of poisons, he understood Dr.

Kohn to say that the poisons must first be extracted by chemical

means. That would not be sufficient, and he had no doubt that if the

subject was pursued farther they would have a paper from him (Dr.

Kohn) some day, indicating that he had obtained arsenic and such

poisons without the previous separation of the metal from organic

matter. It was a very great desideratum to have a method for detecting

arsenic and separating it from the contents of the stomach and food

directly without previous destruction of the organic matter, and he

hoped Dr. Kohn would pursue his work in that direction.

Dr. Hurter said he was about to construct a new laboratory, and he

would assure them that one of its arrangements would be the

installation of electricity, by which to carry out researches similar

to those described. He was very glad to learn that the presence of

arsenic, etc., could be readily proved by means of electrolysis.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 810, July 11, 1891 · 第 46 / 56 题