II

A week of April has gone by—a week of rain and shine, and the singing of

the south wind by day; and, at nights, an intense dark calm full of the

sound of purling brooks.

The river runs high. All the streams are swollen. The low-lying meadows

are half green grass overspread with a pink mist of lady’s-smock, and

half glittering pools of water that bring down the blue of the sky under

your feet as you go. You can never forget the rain for an instant. On

this page, as I sit writing at the open window, the morning sun was

streaming a minute ago: now a ragged grey rain-cloud has come tumbling

over the hills, and I cannot see across the green for the torrent. It is

by almost as quickly as I can set down the words; and now the sunbeams

are pouring in at the window again: the whole village lies before me

drenched and sparkling, the street one long river of blinding light.

Tom Artlett, going by early this morning to his work and spying me in the

garden, called out that he had heard the cuckoo twice already; and it may

well be so. The ringing note of the wryneck—the ‘cuckoo’s mate’—has been

sounding in the elm-tops all the morning through, and the cuckoo is

seldom far behind her messenger. Nightingale and swift, swallow and

martin, they are all on their way northward now, and any day may bring

them. But time spent at this season in looking forward to the things

that will be, is always time wasted. Every hour in early April has its

own new revelation, and common eyes and ears can do no more than mark the

things that are.

Yesterday, in a blink of sunny calm between the showers, I took my midday

walk through the hazel-woods. The young leaves already tempered the

sunlight to the primroses and anemones that covered the woodland floor,

giving all a greenish tinge. Though the whole wood was full of

primroses, it was only by the edges of the fields, where they grew in

full sunshine, that their rich yellow colour had any significance. Here

under the hazels this was so diluted and explained away by the white of

the anemones, and again by the leaf-filtered sunbeams from above, that

the primroses no longer seemed yellow. At a few yards distant, in the

dimmest spots, you could scarce tell one flower from another but for its

shape.

Wherever I went in the wood, the soft droning song of the bees went with

me. You could hardly put one foot before the other without dashing the

cup from the lip of one of these winged wanderers. But though the

anemones and primroses grew so thick, so inextricably mingled together,

the honey-bees kept to the one species of flower. They clambered in and

out of the star-like anemones, sometimes two and three at a blossom

together. But the primroses were always passed over, by hive-bee and

humble-bee alike. Here and there, I picked one of the sulphur blossoms,

and tearing it apart, made sure that there was nectar in plenty—its

presence was plain even to human eye. The truth was, of course, that the

sweets of the primrose were placed so far down the trumpet-tube of the

flower, that no bee had tongue long enough to gather them, even if they

were to her mind.

Yet though the bees might scorn the primrose for much the same reason as

the fox contemned the grapes in the fable, there was one creature

specially told off by Nature to do the necessary work of fertilisation.

Now and again in the general low murmur of voices about me, I could

distinguish an alien note. This came from a large fly, in a light-brown

fluffy jacket, with transparent wings fantastically scalloped in black.

He jerked himself to and fro in the air from one primrose to another,

hovering a moment over each before settling and thrusting a tongue of

amazing length down the yellow throttle of the flower. His name I have

never heard, but I know that, until recent times, he continued to

conceal, not only his means of livelihood, but his very existence from

the vigilance of naturalists: Darwin himself failed to identify this

primrose-sprite with his special mission in fertilising work.

It is strange how familiarity with the commonest natural objects may

exist side by side with a pitiful ignorance about them. I had gathered

primroses every spring for half a lifetime through before I realised that

I bore, not one, but two kinds of blossom in my hand. The discovery, I

remember, came with something like a shock of surprise. Yet there was no

blinking the fact: the wonder, indeed, was that in all the thousands I

had gathered, as boy and youth and man, the thing had never before

occurred to me. There was no difference in the sulphur-hued faces of the

flowers. But while the deep, central tube of some was closed with a

little whorl of pale buff feathers, in others this tube was open, and

there stood just within it a slender stem topped with a small green

globe—it seemed at first sight, then, that the sexual principle in the

primrose was divided, each plant bearing only male, or only female

flowers. But investigating farther, I found that this was not so. Each

flower was truly hermaphrodite, only in one the male feathery anthers

were uppermost, and in the other the green pistil of the female appeared

above.

Thirty years it took me to discover these simple, obvious facts about a

thing I had handled every spring since childhood: how many decades more,

I wonder, must pass ere I shall clear up the final mystery about them, a

matter now to me dark as ever—how, with the primrose alone, this came to

be so; and, above all, why?

Neighbourhood: A year's life in and about an English village · 第 23 / 55 题