THE FOLLOW-UP METHOD.

When you respond to an advertisement offering a booklet or a sample

free, you are pestered by the proprietor of the commodity advertised

with numerous communications importuning your custom, until in sheer

self-defence you make a purchase. Now I had occasion to answer an

announcement advertising for the services of a person with attainments

approximating to my own, decided that, in the event of my application

attracting no response, I would adopt the methods indicated above. For

the benefit of others I give below a record of my procedure and the

result.

My first letter detailed my qualifications, which were very

exceptional; explained that my intelligence and industry were far

above the average; that I was morbidly conscientious, and willing to

sacrifice all my own interests for the needs of the firm; that

the reason for leaving my last position was solely a matter of

circumstances over which I had no control, and that at an interview,

which I craved, I would explain everything to everybody's satisfaction

and prove my perfect eligibility for the post. And so forth.

I waited a fortnight. There was no reply. I therefore despatched a

follow-up letter. I explained my regret at receiving no response to

letter No. 1, and suggested that perhaps it had been inadvertently

overlooked, or had gone astray in transit. Alternatively I hinted that

perhaps the firm regarded the list of my qualifications as incredibly

pretentious, and I assured them that it in no way exaggerated my good

points. I had indeed become, if possible, even more conscientious and

industrious since I had last written, and having recovered from a cold

in the head from which I was then suffering I was actually in better

physical condition than before. I reminded the firm that in granting

me a preliminary interview they incurred no liability whatsoever.

Another two weeks went by, and still no answer. So I despatched

Follow-up Letter No. 2.

This briefly referred to my two previous communications, and asked

whether it was not clear to them that, by securing my services while I

was in possession of all my faculties and the full vigour and strength

of my being, there were advantages they could not possibly acquire

with me in, say, another thirty years, when I should probably be

suffering from rheumatism, chronic dyspepsia, deafness, dim sight,

loss of memory and certainly from approaching old age. I concluded by

offering them three days' free trial (I always do best in the first

three days); if I failed to give satisfaction by the end of that

period they could return me without incurring any obligation

whatsoever.

Again two weeks passed away, and there was still no answer. So I sent

Follow-up Letter No. 3.

In this I announced a Special Offer, viz., a reduction of twenty

pounds sterling (£20) on the salary originally asked if the firm

engaged me within ten days from the date of the offer.

I gave them twelve days in which to respond, but still received no

answer, so, after allowing a further two days' grace, I despatched

Follow-up Letter No. 4, stating that as they had evidently been

prevented from replying to my special offer I had decided to extend

the period for acceptance by fourteen (14) days, reckoning from the

date of the present communication. At the end of that period the

salary demanded would be increased by ten pounds (£10) over and above

that asked in my _first_ application. Thus, by accepting the existing

offer of twenty pounds (£20) reduction, they would really be securing

me at thirty pounds (£30) less than my market price.

I waited patiently for a further fourteen days, and then sent

Follow-up Letter No. 5.

This letter was quite brief. It made no attempt to disguise the fact

that I was hurt at the firm's silence, and it hinted at enquiries from

other employers of labour whose needs would have to be considered.

It intimated also that I could not possibly hold myself at the firm's

disposal indefinitely, and that unless a prompt reply was received

I could not guarantee acceptance. By way of a crushing suggestion of

niggardliness on their part I enclosed a stamped addressed envelope.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, January 17, 1917 · 第 38 / 48 题