MONDAY, MAY 6, 1918

I

My task to-day, Gentlemen, is mainly practical: to choose a

particular book of Scripture and show (if I can) not only that it

deserves to be enjoyed, in its English rendering, as a literary

masterpiece, because it abides in that dress, an indisputable

classic for us, as surely as if it had first been composed in

English; but that it can, for purposes of study, serve the

purpose of any true literary school of English as readily, and as

usefully, as the Prologue to "The Canterbury Tales" or "Hamlet"

or "Paradise Lost." I shall choose "The Book of Job" for several

reasons, presently to be given; but beg you to understand that,

while taking it for a striking illustration, I use it but to

illustrate; that what may be done with "Job" may, in degree, be

done with "Ruth," with "Esther," with the "Psalms," "The Song of

Songs," "Ecclesiastes;" with Isaiah of Jerusalem, Ezekiel, sundry

of the prophets; even with St Luke's Gospel or St Paul's letters

to the Churches.

My first reason, then, for choosing "Job" has already been given.

It is the most striking illustration to be found. Many of the

Psalms touch perfection as lyrical strains: of the ecstacy of

passion in love I suppose "The Song of Songs" to express the very

last word. There are chapters of Isaiah that snatch the very soul

and ravish it aloft. In no literature known to me are short

stories told with such sweet austerity of art as in the Gospel

parables--I can even imagine a high and learned artist in words,

after rejecting them as divine on many grounds, surrendering in

the end to their divine artistry. But for high seriousness

combined with architectonic treatment on a great scale; for

sublimity of conception, working malleably within a structure

which is simple, severe, complete, having a beginning, a middle

and an end; for diction never less than adequate, constantly

right and therefore not seldom superb, as theme, thought and

utterance soar up together and make one miracle, I can name no

single book of the Bible to compare with "Job."

My second reason is that the poem, being brief, compendious and

quite simple in structure, can be handily expounded; "Job" is

what Milton precisely called it, 'a brief model.' And my third

reason (which I must not hide) is that two writers whom I

mentioned in my last lecture Lord Latymer and Professor R. G.

Moulton--have already done this for me. A man who drives at

practice must use the tools other men have made, so he use them

with due acknowledgment; and this acknowledgment I pay by

referring you to Book II of Lord Latymer's "The Poet's Charter,'

and to the analysis of "Job" with which Professor Moulton

introduces his "Literary Study of the Bible.'

On The Art of Reading · 第 101 / 132 题