IV

But how shall Man ever attain to understand and find his proper

place in this Universe, this great sweeping harmonious circle of

which nevertheless he feels himself to be the diminutive focus?

His senses are absurdly imperfect. His ear cannot catch any music

the spheres make; and moreover there are probably neither spheres

nor music. His eye is so dull an instrument that (as Blanco

White's famous sonnet reminds us) he can neither see this world

in the dark, nor glimpse any of the scores of others until it

falls dark:

If Light can thus deceive, wherefore not Life?

Yet the Universal Harmony is meaningless and nothing to man save

in so far as _he_ apprehends it: and lacking him (so far as he

knows) it utterly lacks the compliment of an audience. Is all the

great orchestra designed for nothing but to please its Conductor?

Yes, if you choose: but no, as I think. And here my other

quotation:

That all spirit is mutually attractive, as all matter is

mutually attractive, is an ultimate fact.... Spirit to spirit--

as in water face answereth to face, so the heart of man to man.

Yes and, all spirit being mutually attractive, far more than

this! I preach to you that, through help of eyes that are dim, of

ears that are dull, by instinct of something yet undefined--call

it soul--it wants no less a name--Man has a native impulse and

attraction and yearning to merge himself in that harmony and be

one with it: a spirit of adoption (as St Paul says) whereby we

cry _Abba, Father!_

And because ye are Sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of

His Son into your hearts, crying _Abba, Father._

That is to say, we know we have something within us correspondent

to the harmony, and (I make bold to say) unless we have deadened

it with low desires, worthy to join in it. Even in his common

daily life Man is for ever seeking after harmony, in avoidance of

chaos: he cultivates habits by the clock, he forms committees,

governments, hierarchies, laws, constitutions, by which (as he

hopes) a system of society will work in tune. But these are

childish imitations, underplay on the great motive:

The Kingdom of God is within you.

Quid aliud est anima quam Deus in corpore humano hospitans?

V

Gentlemen, you may be thinking that I have brought you a long way

round, that the hour is wearing late, and that we are yet far

from the prey we first hunted on the line of common-sense. But be

patient for a minute or two, for almost we have our hand on the

animal.

If the Kingdom of God, or anything correspondent to it, be within

us, even in such specks of dust as we separately are, why that,

and that only, can be the light by which you or I may hope to

read the Universal: that, and that only, deserves the name of

'_What Is_.' Nay, I can convince you in a moment. Let me recall a

passage of Emerson quoted by me on the morning I first had the

honour to address an audience in Cambridge:

It is remarkable (says he) that involuntarily we always read

as superior beings. Universal history, the poets, the

romancers, do not in their stateliest pictures ... anywhere

make us feel that we intrude, that this is for better men; but

rather is it true that in their grandest strokes we feel most

at home. All that Shakespeare says of the king, yonder slip of

a boy that reads in the corner feels to be true of himself.

It is remarkable, as Emerson says; and yet, as we now

see, quite simple. A learned man may patronise a less learned

one: but the Kingdom of God cannot patronise the Kingdom

of God, the larger the smaller. There _are_ large and small.

Between these two mysteries of a harmonious universe and

the inward soul are granted to live among us certain men

whose minds and souls throw out filaments more delicate

than ours, vibrating to far messages which they bring home,

to report them to us; and these men we call prophets, poets,

masters, great artists, and when they write it, we call their

report literature. But it is by the spark in us that we read it:

and not all the fire of God that was in Shakespeare can dare

to patronise the little spark in me. If it did, I can see--with

Blake--the angelic host

throw down their spears

And water heaven with their tears.

On The Art of Reading · 第 31 / 132 题