Phi is also used for any opening or cavity: whence we find the head of a

fountain often denominated from it; at least the place, whence the fountain

issued forth, or where it lost itself. And as all streams were sacred, and

all cavities in the earth looked upon with a religious horror, the Amonians

called them Phi-El, Phi-Ainon, Phi-Anes; rendered by the Greeks Phiale,

Phænon, Phanes, Phaneas, Paneas. The chief fountain of the river Jordan

lost itself underground, and rose again at some miles distance. It sunk at

Phiale, and rose again at [346]Paneas. Pliny speaks of a place of this sort

at [347]Memphis, called Phiala; and, as he imagines, from its figure: but

it was undoubtedly a covert aquæduct, by which some branch of the river was

carried. The Nile itself is said to be lost underground, near its

fountains; and that place also was called Phiala. [348]Phialam appellari

fontem ejus, mergique in cuniculos ipsum amnem. There was also a fountain

of this name at [349]Constantinople. Sometimes it occurs without the

aspirate, as in Pella, a city of Palestine, named, undoubtedly, from its

fountains: for Pliny calls it Pellam aquis [350]divitem.

Mines were held sacred; and, like fountains, were denominated from Ænon,

and Hanes, those titles of the Sun. In Arabia, near Petra, was a mine,

worked by condemned persons, which was named [351]Phinon, and Phænon.

Epiphanius mentions [352]Φανησια μεταλλα, or the mines of Hanes; to which

Meletius, a bishop of the Thebaïs, was condemned.

AI.

Ai, and Aia, signifies a district or province; and, as most provinces in

Egypt were insular, it is often taken for an island. In other parts it was

of much the same purport as αια of the Greeks, and betokened any

[353]region or country. It was from hence that so many places have been

represented by the Greeks as plurals, and are found to terminate in _ai_;

such as Athenai, Thebai, Pherai, Patrai, Amyclai, Therapnai, Clazomenai,

Celænai. There are others in _eia_; as Chæroneia, Coroneia, Eleia. In

others it was rendered short; as in Oropia, Ellopia, Ortygia, Olympia,

Æthiopia, Scythia, Cænia, Icaria. It is likewise found expressed by a

single letter, and still subjoined to the proper name: hence we meet with

Ætna, Arbela, Larissa, Roma, Himera, Hemera, Nusa, Nyssa, Patara, Arena,

[354]Cabasa, and the like. We may from hence prove, and from innumerable

other instances, that among the people of the east, as well as among other

nations, the word in regimine was often final. Thus the land of Ion was

termed Ionia; that of Babylon, Babylonia; from Assur came Assyria; from

Ind, India; from Lud, Ludia; in all which the region is specified by the

termination. To say Lydia tellus, Assyria tellus, is in reality

[355]redundant. In the name of Egypt this term preceded, that country being

styled Ai-Gupt, Αιγυπτος, the land of the Gupti, called afterwards Cupti,

and Copti.

COMMON NAMES RELATING TO PLACES.

As to the common names, which are found combined with additional terms, in

order to denote the nature and situation of places; they are, for the most

part, similar to those in the antient Chaldaic, and admit of little

variation.

Air is a city; often expressed Ar, and Ara. Hence Arachosia, Arachotus,

Aracynthus, Arambis, Aramatha (Ar-Ham-aith), Archile, Arzilla, Arthedon:

all which were cities, or else regions denominated from them.

Kir, Caer, Kiriath, are words of the like purport. We read in the

Scriptures of Kiriath Sepher, Kiriath Arba, Kiriath Jearim. It was in some

parts pronounced Kirtha, and Cartha. Melicartus, the Hercules of the

Phenicians and Cretans, was, properly, Melech-Carta, the Deity of the

place. The city of Tigranes, in Armenia, was called Tigranocerta. One name

of Carthage was Καρχηδων, from Car-Chadon, the same as Adon. It was also

called Carthada, from Cartha-Ada, the city of the queen or Goddess, who was

by the Romans supposed to be Juno, but was, properly, the Amonian Elisa.

Caer, among many antient nations, signified a city, or fortress; as we may

learn from the places called Carteia, Carnaim, Caronium, Caroura, Carambis.

Among the Britons were, of old, places exactly analogous; such as

Caerlisle, Caerdiff, Caerphilly, Caernarvon, and Caeruriah in Cornwall.

Kir and Caer are the same term, differently expressed. In Scripture we meet

with Kir Haresh, and Kir-Hareseth. Isaiah. c. 16. v. 7. and v. 11. and Kir

Moab, c. 15. v. 1. and Kir Heres, of the same purport as Kir Haresh, is

mentioned by Jeremiah, c. 48. v. 31. Upon the Euphrates was Cercusium and

Carchemish. In Cyprus was Kironia, rendered Κερωνια by [356]Ptolemy; whose

true name was Kir-On, the city of the Sun; where was a temple to Our-Ain,

styled Urania. Kir-On was often rendered Cironis, Coronis; and the Deity

Coronus and [357]Cronus. By these means the place was substituted for the

Deity, and made an object of worship. Of this abuse I shall often speak.

Artemis was, properly, a city, Ar-Themis, the same as Thamuz of Egypt. What

was called Artemis, and Artemisium, was in some places reversed, and

expressed by Kir subjoined: hence Themiscir, and Themiscura in Pontus.

Col, Cal, Calah, Calach, signify properly an eminence, like the Collis of

the Romans; but are often used for a fortress so situated. We sometimes

meet with a place styled absolute Calah: but the term is generally used in

composition, as Cala Nechus, Cala-Anac, Cala-Chan, Cala-On, Cala-Es,

Cala-Ait, Cala-Ur, Cala-Ope, Cala-Ham, Cala-Amon, Cala-Adon: whence came

the names of people and places styled [358]Callinicus, Calachene,

[359]Colonæ, Cales, Calathe, Calistæ, Calathusa, Calauria, Coloriua,

Caliope, Calama, Calamos, [360]Calamon, Calymna, Calydnus, Calycadnus; all

which were places in Phrygia, Bithynia, Assyria, Libya, denominated from

their situation and worship.

Comah is used for a wall; but seems to be sometimes taken for those sacred

inclosures wherein they had their Puratheia; and particularly for the

sacred mount which stood in those inclosures. From Comah came the Greek

χωμα, a round hill or mound of earth; called also Taph and ταφος; and

thence often mistaken for a tomb: but it was originally a high altar.

By Gib is meant a hill. Gibeon was the hill of the Sun; said to be famous

for its springs. Gibethon is a compound of Gib-Ethon, or Ath-On, titles of

the same Deity. Nadab, the son of Jeroboam, was slain by Baasha, at

Gibethon, of the [361]Philistines.

Har and Hor signify a mountain; ορος of the Greeks.

Tin seems to have signified a sacred place, for sacrifice; a kind of high

altar. The Greeks generally expressed it, in composition, Τις· hence we

read of Opheltis, Altis, Baaltis, Abantis, Absyrtis. It was in use among

the antient Hetrurians and other nations: hence came the terms Aventinus,

Palatinus, [362]Numantinus, &c. It seems to be the same as Tan in the east,

which occurs continually in composition, as in Indos-tan, Mogolis-tan,

Pharsis-tan, Chusis-tan.

Tor is a hill or tower. Many places in Greece had it in their composition;

such as Torone, Torete, Toreate: also in Hetrurïa, Torchonium. Turzon, in

Africa, was a tower of the [363]Sun. It was sometimes expressed Tar; hence

Tarcunia, Taracena, Tarracon in Spain, Tarne (Tar-ain) which gave name to a

fountain in Lydia; Taron (Tar-On) in Mauritania. Towers of old were either

Prutaneia, or light-houses, and were styled Tor-Is: whence came the Turris

of the Romans. Sometimes these terms were reversed, and the tower was

called Astur. Such a one was near some hot streams, at no great distance

from Cicero's Villa. It is thus described by Plutarch: Αστυρα--χωριον

παραλιον Κικερωνος. The river, too, was called Astura. There was also a

place of this name opposite to the island Lesbos, undoubtedly denominated

from the like circumstances in its situation; as may be learned from

Pausanias, who had seen it. Ὑδωρ δε απο πηγων ανερχομενον μελαν ιδων οιδα

εν Αστυροις· ταδε Αστυρα απαντικρυ εστι Λεσβου· λουτρα εστι θερμα εν τῳ

Αταρνει καλουμενῳ.

Caph, Cap, and Cephas, signify a rock; and also any promontory or headland.

As temples used to be built upon eminences of this sort; we find this word

often compounded with the titles of the Deity there worshipped, as Caph-El,

Caph-El-On, Caph-Aur, Caph-Arez, Caph-Is, Caph-Is-Ain, Caph-Ait; whence

came Cephale, Cephalonia, Caphareus, Capisa, Cephisus, Capissene, Cephene,

Caphyatæ, Capatiani. In Iberia was a wonderful edifice upon the river

Bœtis, mentioned by Strabo, and called Turris Capionis. It was a Pharos,

dedicated, as all such buildings were, to the Sun: hence it was named

Cap-Eon, Petra Solis. It seems to have been a marvellous structure. Places

of this sort, which had towers upon them, were called Caphtor. Such an one

was in Egypt, or in its [364]vicinity; whence the Caphtorim had their name.

It was probably near [365]Pelusium, which they quitted very early for the

land of Canaan.

Diu sometimes, but sparingly, occurs for an island; and is generally by the

Greeks changed to Dia, Δια. The purport of it may be proved from its being

uniformly adapted to the same object. The Scholiast upon Theocritus takes

notice that the island Naxos was called Dia: [366]Διαν την νυν καλουμενην

Ναξον; and he adds, πολλαι δε και ἑτεραι εισι νησοι Διαι καλουμεναι, ἡτε

προ της Κρητης--και ἡ περι Μηλον, και ἡ περι Αμοργον, και ἡ της Κεω

χεῤῥονησος, και ἡ Πελοποννησου. All these were islands, or peninsula

regions.

BETH.

Beth is a house or temple; as in [367]Beth-El, Beth-Dagon, Beth-Shemesh,

Beth-Oron, or Beth-Or-On, &c. &c. It is sometimes subjoined, as in

Phar-beth, and Elisa-beth; the latter of which is the house of [368]Elisa,

the same as Elusa of Idume, and Eleusa of Egypt. Beth was in different

countries expressed Bat, Bad, Abad. Hence we meet at this day with

Pharsabad, Astrabad, Amenabad, Moustafabad, Iahenabad in Persia, India, and

other parts of the east. Balbec in Syria is supposed to be the same as

Balbeth, the temple of Bal, or the Sun. _There are_, says [369]Dr. Pocock,

_many cities in Syria, that retain their antient names. Of this Balbeck, or

rather Balbeit, is an instance; which signifies the house or temple of

Baal_. Gulielmus Tyrius, so called from being bishop of Tyre, who wrote of

the Holy war, alludes to Baalbec, under the name of [370]Balbeth. He lived

in the eleventh century, and died anno 1127. According to Iablonsky, Bec

and Beth are of the same meaning. Atarbec in Egypt is the temple of Atar or

Athar; called Atarbechis by [371]Herodotus. The same is Athyr-bet, and

styled Athribites (Αθρειβιτης) by [372]Strabo. The inner recess of a temple

is by Phavorinus and Hesychius called Βαιτης, Βετης, Βετις, similar to בית

אש among the Chaldeans. It was the crypta or sacred place, where of old the

everlasting fire was preserved. Hesychius observes, Βετης, το αποκρυφον

μερος του Ἱερου. Bet-Is signifies the place of fire.

It is said of Horapollo by Suidas, that he was a native of Phainubuth in

Egypt, belonging to the nome of Panopolis: Ὡραπολλων Φαινυβυθεως κωμης του

Πανοπολιτου Νομου. Phainubuth is only Phainabeth varied, and signifies the

place sacred to Phanes; which was one of the most antient titles of the

Deity in Egypt. So Pharbeth was an abbreviation of Pharabeth, or the house

of Pharaoh.

GAU, expressed CAU, CA, and CO.

Gau likewise is a term which signifies a house; as we learn from Plutarch.

The great and decisive battle between Alexander and Darius is generally

said to have been fought at Arbela. But we are assured by this writer, that

it was decided at Gaugamela[373]. He says, that Gau signified in the

language of the country a house: and that the purport of the word Gaugamela

was the house of a camel. This name, it seems, was given to the town on

account of a tribute exacted for the maintenance of a camel, which had

saved the life of some king, when he fled from battle: and the reason why

the victory of Alexander was adjudged to Arbela, arose from its being more

famous than the other place: for Gaugamela was not of sufficient repute:

therefore the honour of this victory was given to Arbela, though it was

according to some five hundred, according to others six hundred stadia[374]

from the field of battle. I have not now time, nor is it to my purpose, to

enter into a thorough discussion of this point: I will only mention it as

my opinion, that Arbela and Gaugamela were the same place. The king alluded

to is said by [375]Strabo to have been Darius the son of Hystaspes. But is

it credible, that so great a prince, who had horses of the famous breed of

Nysa, as well as those of Persis and Arabia, the most fleet of their kind,

should be so circumstanced in battle, as to be forced to mount a camel,

that could scarce move six miles in an hour: and this at a time when the

greatest dispatch was necessary? This author gives a different reason for

the place being thus denominated. He says, that it was allotted for the

maintenance of a camel, which used to bring the king's provisions from

Scythia, but was tired and failed upon the road. I know not which of the

two circumstances in this short detail is most exceptionable; a king of

Persia's provisions being brought to Babylon, or Sushan from Scythia; or a

tired camel having such a pension. The truth is this: the Grecians

misinterpreted the name, and then forged these legendary stories to support

their [376]mistake. Had they understood the term, they would have been

consistent in their history. Gau, and, as it was at times expressed, Cau,

certainly signifies a house, or temple: also a cave, or hollow; near which

the temple of the Deity was founded. For the Amonians erected most of their

sacred edifices near caverns, and deep openings of the earth. Gaugamela was

not the house of a camel, as Plutarch and Strabo would persuade us,

notwithstanding the stories alleged in support of the notion: but it was

the house and temple of Cam-El, the Deity of the country. Arbela was a

place sacred to Bel, called Arbel, אור בל of the Chaldeans. It was the same

as Beth Arbel of [377]Hosea: and Gaugamela is of the same purport, relating

to the same God under different titles. The Grecians were grossly ignorant

in respect to foreign events, as Strabo repeatedly confesses: and other

writers do not scruple to own it. Lysimachus had been an attendant upon

Alexander during the whole series of his conquests in Asia: there had been

nothing of moment transacted, in the success of which he had not partaken.

Yet even in his days, when he was king of Thrace, the accounts of those

great actions had been so misrepresented, that when a history of them was

read in his presence, they seemed quite new to him. It is all very fine,

says the prince; but where was I when all this happened? There was a series

of events exhibited, with which the person most interested was least

acquainted. We may then well imagine, that there existed in the time of

Plutarch many mistakes, both in respect to the geography of countries very

remote, and to the [378]language of nations, with whom the Romans were

little acquainted. The great battle, of which we have been speaking, was

confessedly fought at Gaugamela. Ptolemy Ceraunus, who was present, averred

it: as did Aristobulus: and it has been recorded by Plutarch and others. It

is also adjudged to Arbela by persons of equal credit: and it must

certainly have been really there transacted: for notwithstanding the

palliating excuse of Plutarch, it is utterly incredible in respect to so

great a victory, that the scene of action should be determined by this

place, if it were sixty, or, as some say, seventy miles out of the way. But

in reality it was at no such distance. Diodorus Siculus says, that

Alexander immediately after the victory attacked Arbela, and took it: and

found in it many evidences of its being a place of consequence. [379]Θαψας

τους τετελευτηκοτας επεβαλε τοις Αρβηλοις, και πολλην μεν ἑυρεν αφθονιαν

της τροφης, ουκ ολιγον δε κοσμον, και γαζαν βαρβαρικην, αργυριου δε ταλαντα

δισχιλια. The battle was fought so near the city, that Alexander was afraid

of some contagion from the dead bodies of the enemy, which lay close by it

in great abundance.

I have mentioned, that Gaugamela was the temple of Cham-El, or Cham-Il.

This was a title of the Deity brought from Chaldea to Egypt; and from

thence to Greece, Hetruria, and other regions. The Greeks, out of different

titles, and combinations, formed various Deities; and then invented

different degrees of relation, which they supposed to have subsisted

between them. According to Acusilaus Cham-Il was the Son of Vulcan, and

Cabeira. [380]Ακουσιλαος δε ὁ Αργειος εκ Καβειρης και Ἡφαιστου Καμιλον

λεγει. He was, by others, rendered Camillus, whose attendants were the

Camilli; and he was esteemed the same as Hermes of Egypt. [381]Statius

Tullianus de vocabulis rerum libro primo ait dixisse Callimachum, Tuscos

Camillum appellare Mercurium, &c. Romani quoque pueros et puellas nobiles

et investes Camillos et Camillas appellant, Flaminicarum et Flaminum

præministros. Servius speaks to the same purpose. [382]Mercurius Hetruscâ

linguâ Camillus dicitur. The reason of the attendants being also called

Camilli was in consequence of a custom among the antients of conferring

generally upon the priests the title of the Deity whom they served. The

Camilli were commonly young persons of good family, as we learn from

Plutarch, and were to be found in the temples of Jupiter, or Zeus: for Zeus

and Hermes were originally the same: [383]Και τον ὑπηρετουντα τῳ Ἱερῳ του

Διος αμφιθαλη παιδα λεγεσθαι Καμιλλον, ᾡς και τον Ἑρμην· ὁυτως ενιοι των

Ἑλληνων Καμιλλον απο της διακονιας προσηγορευον. He mentions

Ἑρμην--Καμιλλον απο της διακονιας, and supposes that Camillus had the name

of Hermes from the similarity of his office, which was waiting upon the

Gods. But the Chaldeans and Egyptians, from whom these titles were

borrowed, esteemed Hermes as the chief Deity, the same as Zeus, Bel, and

Adon. They knew nothing of Mercurius pedissequus, nor Hermes the lacky.

They styled their chief God Cam-Il, or Camillus, and his priests had the

same title. He did not borrow it from them; but they received it from him.

The name is sometimes expressed Camulus: and the Amonians, who travelled

westward, brought his rites and worship into the western parts of Europe:

hence there are inscriptions to be found inscribed [384]Camulo Sancto

Fortissimo. He was sometimes taken for Mars: as we may learn from an

inscription in Gruter:

[385] MARTI CAMULO

Ob Salutem Tiberi Claud. Cæs. Cives Remi

posuerunt.

Such is the history of this Deity; whose worship was better known in the

more early ages; and whose temple was styled Gau-Camel, by the Greeks

rendered Gaugamela. I make no doubt but that Arbela was the same place: for

places had as many names as the Deity worshipped had titles. Arbela was

probably the city, and Gaugamela the [386]temple; both sacred to the same

Deity, under different names.

It is remarkable that Syncellus, speaking of Venephres, King of Egypt,

says, that he built the pyramids of [387]Co-Chone; which are the principal

pyramids of that country. Eusebius before him had taken notice of the same

history: [388]Ουενεφρης, εφ' ὁυ ὁ λιμος κατεσχε την χωραν, ὁς και τας

Πυραμιδας περι Κοχωνην ηγειρεν. _Venephres was a prince, in whose time

happened a famine in the land of Egypt. He was the same, who built the

Pyramids about Cochone_. Now Co-Chone, analogous to Beth-El, Beth-Shan,

Beth-Dagon, signifies the temple of the Deity; the house of the great king,

or ruler: for such is the purport of Con, and Conah. Hercules, the chief

Deity of Tyre, and who was also highly reverenced in Egypt, was Styled Con.

[389]Τον Ἡρακλην φησι κατα την Αιγυπτιων διαλεκτον Κωνα λεγεσθαι. From

hence we find, that it was a sacred Egyptian title. According to some

readings the place is expressed Cocome; which is of the same purport.

Co-Chome, the same as Cau-Come, signifies the house of Chom, or the Sun;

and seems to betray the purpose for which the chief pyramid was erected:

for it was undoubtedly nothing else but a monument to the Deity, whose name

it bore. According to [390] Herodotus the great pyramid was built by

Cheops; whom others called Chaops. But Chaops is a similar compound; being

made up of the terms Cha-Ops, and signifies οικος Πυθωνος, domus Opis

Serpentis. It was the name of the pyramid, which was erected to the Sun,

the Ophite Deity of Egypt, worshipped under the symbol of a serpent.

Analogous to Cau-Come in Egypt was a place in Ethiopia, called [391]Cuscha:

doubtless so named from Chus, the great ancestor from whom the Ethiopians

were descended.

A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 1 (of 6) · 第 6 / 22 段