THE MANY-SIDED CONTRAST OF WISDOM AND FOLLY

'Whoso loveth instruction loveth knowledge: but he that hateth reproof

is brutish. 2. A good man obtaineth favour of the Lord: but a man of

wicked devices will he condemn. 3. A man shall not be established by

wickedness; but the root of the righteous shall not be moved. 4. A

virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed

is as rottenness in his bones. 5. The thoughts of the righteous are

right: but the counsels of the wicked are deceit. 6. The words of the

wicked are to lie in wait for blood: but the mouth of the upright

shall deliver them. 7. The wicked are overthrown, and are not: but the

house of the righteous shall stand. 8. A man shall be commended

according to his wisdom: but he that is of a perverse heart shall be

despised. 9. He that is despised, and hath a servant, is better than

he that honoureth himself, and lacketh bread. 10. A righteous man

regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked

are cruel. 11. He that tilleth his land shall be satisfied with bread:

but he that followeth vain persons is void of understanding. 12. The

wicked desireth the net of evil men: but the root of the righteous

yieldeth fruit. 13. The wicked is snared by the transgression of his

lips: but the just shall come out of trouble. 14. A man shall be

satisfied with good by the fruit of his mouth; and the recompence of a

man's hands shall be rendered unto him. 15. The way of a fool is right

in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is

wise.'--PROVERBS xii. 1-15.

The verses of the present passage are a specimen of the main body of

the Book of Proverbs. They are not a building, but a heap. The stones

seldom have any mortar between them, and connection or progress is for

the most part sought in vain. But one great antithesis runs through

the whole--the contrast of wisdom or righteousness with folly or

wickedness. The compiler or author is never weary of setting out that

opposition in all possible lights. It is, in his view, the one

difference worth noting between men, and it determines their whole

character and fortunes. The book traverses with keen observation all

the realm of life, and everywhere finds confirmation of its great

principle that goodness is wisdom and sin folly.

There is something extremely impressive in this continual reiteration

of that contrast. As we read, we feel as if, after all, there were

nothing in the world but it and its results. That profound sense of

the existence and far-reaching scope of the division of men into two

classes is not the least of the benefits which a thoughtful study of

Proverbs brings to us. In this lesson it is useless to attempt to

classify the verses. Slight traces of grouping appear here and there;

but, on the whole, we have a set of miscellaneous aphorisms turning on

the great contrast, and setting in various lights the characters and

fates of the righteous and the wicked.

The first mark of difference is the opposite feeling about discipline.

If a man is wise, he will love 'knowledge'; and if he loves knowledge,

he will love the means to it, and therefore will not kick against

correction. That is another view of trials from the one which

inculcates devout submission to a Father. It regards only the benefits

to ourselves. If we want to be taught anything, we shall not flinch

from the rod. There must be pains undergone in order to win knowledge

of any sort, and the man who rebels against these shows that he had

rather be comfortable and ignorant than wise. A pupil who will not

stand having his exercises corrected will not learn his faults. On the

other hand, hating reproof is 'brutish' in the most literal sense; for

it is the characteristic of animals that they do not understand the

purpose of pain, and never advance because they do not. Men can grow

because they can submit to discipline; beasts cannot improve because,

except partially and in a few cases, they cannot accept correction.

The first proverb deals with wisdom or goodness in its inner source;

namely, a docile disposition. The two next deal with its consequences.

It secures God's favour, while its opposite is condemned; and then, as

a consequence of this, the good man is established and the wicked

swept away. The manifestations of God's favour and its opposite are

not to be thrown forward to a future life. Continuously the sunshine

of divine love falls on the one man, and already the other is

condemned. It needs some strength of faith to look through the shows

of prosperity often attending plain wickedness, and believe that it is

always a blunder to do wrong.

But a moderate experience of life will supply many instances of

prosperous villainy in trade and politics which melted away like mist.

The shore is strewn with wrecks, dashed to pieces because

righteousness did not steer. Every exchange gives examples in plenty.

How many seemingly solid structures built on wrong every man has seen

in his lifetime crumble like the cloud masses which the wind piles in

the sky and then dissipates! The root of the righteous is in God, and

therefore he is firm. The contrast is like that of Psalm i.--between

the tree with strong roots and waving greenery, and the chaff,

rootless, and therefore whirled out of the threshing-floor.

The universal contrast is next applied to women; and in accordance

with the subordinate position they held in old days, the bearing of

her goodness is principally regarded as affecting her husband. That

does not cover the whole ground, of course. But wherever there is a

true marriage, the wife will not think that woman's rights are

infringed because one chief issue of her beauty of virtue is the

honour and joy it reflects upon him who has her heart. 'A virtuous

woman' is not only one who possesses the one virtue to which the

phrase has been so miserably confined, but who is 'a woman of

strength'--no doll or plaything, but

'A perfect woman, nobly planned

To warn, to comfort, and command.'

The gnawing misery of being fastened like two dogs in a leash to one

who 'causes shame' is vividly portrayed by that strong figure, that

she is like 'rottenness in his bones,' eating away strength, and

inflicting disfigurement and torture.

Then come a pair of verses describing the inward and outward work of

the two kinds of men as these affect others. The former verses dealt

with their effects on the actors; the present, with their bearing on

others. Inwardly, the good man has thoughts which scrupulously keep

the balance true and are just to his fellows, while the wicked plans

to deceive for his own profit. When thoughts are translated into

speech, deceit bears fruit in words which are like ambushes of

murderers, laying traps to destroy, while the righteous man's words

are like angels of deliverance to the unsuspecting who are ready to

fall into the snare. Selfishness, which is the root of wickedness,

will be cruelty and injustice when necessary for its ends. The man who

is wise because God is his centre and aim will be merciful and

helpful. The basis of philanthropy is religion. The solemn importance

attached to speech is observable. Words can slay as truly as swords.

Now that the press has multiplied the power of speech, and the world

is buzzing with the clatter of tongues, we all need to lay to heart

the responsibilities and magic power of spoken and printed words, and

'to set a watch on the door of our lips.'

Then follow a couple of verses dealing with the consequences to men

themselves of their contrasted characters. The first of these (verse

7) recurs to the thought of verse 3, but with a difference. Not only

the righteous himself, but his house, shall be established. The

solidarity of the family and the entail of goodness are strongly

insisted on in the Old Testament, though limitations are fully

recognised. If a good man's son continues his father's character, he

will prolong his father's blessings; and in normal conditions, a

parent's wisdom passes on to his children. Something is wrong when, as

is so often the case, it does not; and it is not always the children's

fault.

The overthrow of the wicked is set in striking contrast with their

plots to overthrow others. Their mischief comes back, like an

Australian boomerang, to the hand that flings it; and contrariwise,

delivering others is a sure way of establishing one's self. Exceptions

there are, for the world-scheme is too complicated to be condensed

into a formula; but all proverbs speak of the average usual results of

virtue and vice, and those of this book do the same. Verse 8 asserts

that, on the whole, honour attends goodness, and contempt wickedness.

Of course, companions in dissipation extol each other's vices, and

launch the old threadbare sneers at goodness. But if wisdom were not

set uppermost in men's secret judgment, there would be no hypocrites,

and their existence proves the truth of the proverb.

Verse 9 seems suggested by 'despised' in verse 8. There are two kinds

of contempt--one which brands sin deservedly, one which vulgarly

despises everybody who is not rich. A man need not mind, though his

modest household is treated with contempt, if quiet righteousness

reigns in it. It is better to be contented with little, and humble in

a lowly place, than to be proud and hungry, as many were in the

writer's time and since. A foolish world set on wealth may despise,

but its contempt breaks no bones. Self-conceit is poor diet.

This seems to be the first of a little cluster of proverbs bearing on

domestic life. It prefers modest mediocrity of station, such as Agur

desired. Its successor shows how the contrasted qualities come out in

the two men's relation to their domestic animals. Goodness sweeps a

wide circle touching the throne of God and the stall of the cattle. It

was not Coleridge who found out that 'He prayeth best who loveth best'

but this old proverb-maker; and he could speak the thought without the

poet's exaggeration, which robs his expression of it of half its

value. The original says 'knoweth the soul' which may indeed mean,

'regardeth the life' but rather seems to suggest sympathetic interest

in leading to an understanding of the dumb creature, which must

precede all wise care for its well-being. It is a part of religion to

try to enter into the mysterious feelings of our humble dependants in

farmyard and stable. On the other hand, for want of such sympathetic

interest, even when the 'wicked' means to be kind, he does harm; or

the word rendered 'tender mercies' may here mean the feelings

(literally, 'bowels') which, in their intense selfishness, are cruel

even to animals.

Verse 11 has no connection with the preceding, unless the link is

common reference to home life and business. It contrasts the sure

results of honest industry with the folly of speculation. The Revised

Version margin 'vain things' is better than the text 'vain persons,'

which would give no antithesis to the patient tilling of the first

clause. That verse would make an admirable motto to be stretched

across the Stock Exchange, and like places on both sides of the

Atlantic. How many ruined homes and heart-broken wives witness in

America and England to its truth! The vulgar English proverb, 'What

comes over the Devil's back goes under his belly,' says the same

thing. The only way to get honest wealth is to work for it. Gambling

in all its forms is rank folly.

So the next proverb (verse 12) continues the same thought, and puts it

in a somewhat difficult phrase. It goes a little deeper than the

former, showing that the covetousness which follows after vain things,

is really wicked lusting for unrighteous gain. 'The net of evildoers'

is better taken as in the margin (Rev. Ver.) 'prey' or 'spoil,' and

the meaning seems to be as just stated. Such hankering for riches, no

matter how obtained, or such envying of the booty which admittedly has

been won by roguery, is a mark of the wicked. How many professing

church members have known that feeling in thinking of the millions of

some railway king! Would they like the proverb to be applied to them?

The contrast to this is 'the root of the righteous yields fruit,' or

'shoots forth,' We have heard (verse 3) that it shall never be moved,

being fixed in God; now we are told that it will produce all that is

needful. A life rooted in God will unfold into all necessary good,

which will be better than the spoil of the wicked. There are two ways

of getting on--to struggle and fight and trample down rivals; one, to

keep near God and wait for him. 'Ye fight and war; ye have not,

because ye ask not.'

The next two proverbs have in common a reference to the effect of

speech upon the speaker. 'In the transgression of the lips is an evil

snare'; that is, sinful words ensnare their utterer, and whoever else

he harms, he himself is harmed most. The reflex influence on character

of our utterances is not present to us, as it should be. They leave

stains on lips and heart. Thoughts expressed are more definite and

permanent thereby. A vicious thought clothed in speech has new power

over the speaker. If we would escape from that danger, we must

_be_ righteous, and _speak_ righteousness; and then the same

cause will deepen our convictions of 'whatsoever things are lovely and

of good report.'

Verse 14 insists on this opposite side of the truth. Good words will

bring forth fruit, which will satisfy the speaker, because, whatever

effects his words may have on others, they will leave strengthened

goodness and love of it in himself. 'If the house be worthy, your

peace shall rest upon it; if not, it shall return to you again.' That

reaction of words on oneself is but one case of the universal law of

consequences coming back on us. We are the architects of our own

destinies. Every deed has an immortal life, and returns, either like a

raven or a dove, to the man who sent it out on its flight. It comes

back either croaking with blood on its beak, or cooing with an olive

branch in its mouth. All life is at once sowing and reaping. A harvest

comes in which retribution will be even more entire and accurate.

The last proverb of the passage gives a familiar antithesis, and

partially returns to the thought of verse 1. The fool has no standard

of conduct but his own notions, and is absurdly complacent as to all

his doings. The wise seeks better guidance than his own, and is

docile, because he is not so ridiculously sure of his infallibility.

No type of weak wickedness is more abominable to the proverbialist

than that of pert self-conceit, which knows so little that it thinks

it knows everything, and is 'as untameable as a fly.' But in the

wisest sense, it is true that a mark of folly is

self-opinionativeness; that a man who has himself for teacher has a

fool for scholar; that the test of wisdom is willingness to be taught;

and, especially, that to bring a docile, humble spirit to the Source

of all wisdom, and to ask counsel of God, is the beginning of true

insight, and that the self-sufficiency which is the essence of sin, is

never more fatal than when it is ignorant of guilt, and therefore

spurns a Saviour.

Expositions of Holy Scripture Second Kings Chapters VIII to End and Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. Esther, Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes · 第 268 / 354 题