THE PEACEABLE FRUITS OF SORROWS RIGHTLY BORNE

'Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth: therefore despise not

thou the chastening of the Almighty: 18. For He maketh sore, and

bindeth up: He woundeth, and His hands make whole. 19. He shall

deliver thee in six troubles: yea, in seven there shall no evil touch

thee. 20. In famine He shall redeem thee from death: and in war from

the power of the sword. 21. Thou shalt be hid from the scourge of the

tongue: neither shalt thou be afraid of destruction when it cometh.

22. At destruction and famine thou shalt laugh: neither shalt thou be

afraid of the beasts of the earth. 23. For thou shalt be in league

with the stones of the field: and the beasts of the field shall be at

peace with thee. 24. And thou shalt know that thy tabernacle shall be

in peace; and thou shalt visit thy habitation, and shalt not sin. 25.

Thou shalt know also that thy seed shall be great, and thine offspring

as the grass of the earth. 26. Thou shalt come to thy grave in a full

age, like as a shock of corn cometh in in his season. 27. Lo this, we

have searched it, so it is; hear it, and know thou it for thy

good.'--JOB v. 17-27.

The close of the Book of Job shows that his friends' speeches were

defective, and in part erroneous. They all proceeded on the assumption

that suffering was the fruit of sin--a principle which, though true in

general, is not to be unconditionally applied to specific cases. They

all forgot that good men might be exposed to it, not as punishment,

nor even as correction, but as trial, to 'know what was in their

hearts.'

Eliphaz is the best of the three friends, and his speeches embody much

permanent truth, and rise, as in this passage, to a high level of

literary and artistic beauty. There are few lovelier passages in

Scripture than this glowing description of the prosperity of the man

who accepts God's chastisements; and, on the whole, the picture is

true. But the underlying belief in the uniform coincidence of inward

goodness and outward good needs to be modified by the deeper teaching

of the New Testament before it can be regarded as covering all the

facts of life.

Eliphaz is gathering up, in our passage, the threads of his speech. He

bases upon all that he has been saying the exhortation to Job to be

thankful for his sorrows. With a grand paradox, he declares the man

who is afflicted to be happy. And therein he strikes an eternally true

note. It is good to be made to drink a cup of sorrow. Flesh calls pain

evil, but spirit knows it to be good. The list of our blessings is not

only written in bright inks, but many are inscribed in black. And the

reason why the sad heart should be a happy heart is because, as

Eliphaz believed, sadness is God's fatherly correction, intended to

better the subject of it. 'Whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth,' says

the Epistle to the Hebrews, in full accord with Eliphaz.

But his well-meant and true words flew wide of their mark, for two

reasons. They were chillingly didactic, and it is vinegar upon nitre

to stand over an agonised soul and preach platitudes in an

unsympathetic voice. And they assumed unusual sin in Job as the

explanation of his unparalleled pains, while the prologue tells us

that his sufferings were not fruits of his sin, but trials of his

righteousness. He was horrified at Job's words, which seemed to him

full of rebellion and irreverence; and he made no allowance for the

wild cries of an agonised heart when he solemnly warned the sufferer

against 'despising' God's chastening. A more sympathetic ear would

have detected the accent of faith in the groans.

The collocation, in verse 18, of making sore and binding up, does not

merely express sequence, but also purpose. The wounding is in order to

healing. The wounds are merciful surgery; and their intention is

health, like the cuts that lay open an ulcer, or the scratches for

vaccination. The view of suffering in these two verses is not

complete, but it goes far toward completeness in tracing it to God, in

asserting its disciplinary intention, in pointing to the divine

healing which is meant to follow, and in exhorting to submission. We

may recall the beautiful expansion of that exhortation in Hebrews,

where 'faint not' is added to 'despise not,' so including the two

opposite and yet closely connected forms of misuse of sorrow,

according as we stiffen our wills against it, and try to make light of

it, or yield so utterly to it as to collapse. Either extreme equally

misses the corrective purpose of the grief.

On this general statement follows a charming picture of the

blessedness which attends the man who has taken his chastisement

rightly. After the thunderstorm come sunshine and blue, and the song

of birds. But, lovely as it is, and capable of application in many

points to the life of every man who trustfully yields to God's will,

it must not be taken as a literally and absolutely true statement of

God's dealings with His children. If so regarded, it would hopelessly

be shattered against facts; for the world is full of instances of

saintly men and women who have not experienced in their outward lives

such sunny calm and prosperity stretching to old age as are here

promised. Eliphaz is not meant to be the interpreter of the mysteries

of Providence, and his solution is decisively rejected at the close.

But still there is much in this picture which finds fulfilment in all

devout lives in a higher sense than his intended meaning.

The first point is that the devout soul is exempt from calamities

which assail those around it. These are such as are ordinarily in

Scripture recognised as God's judgments upon a people. Famine and war

devastate, but the devout soul abides in peace, and is satisfied. Now

it is not true that faith and submission make a wall round a man, so

that he escapes from such calamities. In the supernatural system of

the Old Testament such exemptions were more usual than with us, though

this very Book of Job and many a psalm show that devout hearts had

even then to wrestle with the problem of the prosperity of the wicked

and the indiscriminate fall of widespread calamities on the good and

bad.

But in its deepest sense (which, however, is not Eliphaz's sense) the

faithful man is saved from the evils which he, in common with his

faithless neighbour, experiences. Two men are smitten down by the same

disease, or lie dying on a battlefield, shattered by the same shell,

and the one receives the fulfilment of the promise, 'there shall no

evil touch thee,' and the other does not. For the evil in the evil is

all sucked out of it, and the poison is wiped off the arrow which

strikes him who is united to God by faith and submission. Two women

are grinding at the same millstone, and the same blow kills them both;

but the one is delivered, and the other is not. They who pass through

an evil, and are not drawn away from God by it, but brought nearer to

Him, are hid from its power. To die may be our deliverance from death.

Eliphaz's promises rise still higher in verses 22 and 23, in which is

set forth a truth that in its deepest meaning is of universal

application. The wild beasts of the earth and the stones of the field

will be in league with the man who submits to God's will. Of course

the beasts come into view as destructive, and the stones as injuring

the fertility of the fields. There is, probably, allusion to the story

of Paradise and the Fall. Man's relation to nature was disturbed by

sin; it will be rectified by his return to God. Such a doctrine of the

effects of sin in perverting man's relation to creatures runs all

through Scripture, and is not to be put aside as mere symbolism.

But the large truth underlying the words here is that, if we are

servants of God, we are masters of everything. 'All things work

together for good to them that love God.' All things serve the soul

that serves God; as, on the other hand, all are against him that does

not, and 'the stars in their courses fight against' those who fight

against Him. All things are ours, if we are Christ's. The many

mediaeval legends of saints attended by animals, from St. Jerome

and his lion downwards to St. Francis preaching to the birds, echo the

thoughts here. A gentle, pure soul, living in amity with dumb

creatures, has wonderful power to attract them. They who are at peace

with God can scarcely be at war with any of God's creatures.

Gentleness is stronger than iron bands. 'Cords of love' draw most

surely.

Peace and prosperity in home and possessions are the next blessings

promised (ver. 24). 'Thou shalt visit [look over] thy household, and

shalt miss nothing.' No cattle have strayed or been devoured by evil

beasts, or stolen, as all Job's had been. Alas! Eliphaz knew nothing

about commercial crises, and the great system of credit by which one

scoundrel's fall may bring down hundreds of good men and patient

widows, who look over their possessions and find nothing but worthless

shares. Yet even for those who find all at once that the herd is cut

off from the stall, their tabernacle may still be in peace, and though

the fold be empty they may miss nothing, if in the empty place they

find God. That is what Christians may make out of the words; but it is

not what was originally meant by them.

In like manner the next blessing, that of a numerous posterity, does

not depend on moral or religious condition, as Eliphaz would make out,

and in modern days is not always regarded as a blessing. But note the

singular heartlessness betrayed in telling Job, all whose flocks and

herds had been carried off, and his children laid dead in their

festival chamber, that abundant possessions and offspring were the

token of God's favour. The speaker seems serenely unconscious that he

was saying anything that could drive a knife into the tortured man. He

is so carried along on the waves of his own eloquence, and so absorbed

in stringing together the elements of an artistic whole, that he

forgets the very sorrows which he came to comfort. There are not a few

pious exhorters of bleeding hearts who are chargeable with the same

sin. The only hand that will bind up without hurting is a hand that is

sympathetic to the finger-tips. No eloquence or poetic beauty or

presentation of undeniable truths will do as substitutes for that.

The last blessing promised is that which the Old Testament places so

high in the list of good things--long life. The lovely metaphor in

which that promise is couched has become familiar to us all. The ripe

corn gathered into a sheaf at harvest-time suggests festival rather

than sadness. It speaks of growth accomplished, of fruit matured, of

the ministries of sun and rain received and used, and of a joyful

gathering into the great storehouse. There is no reference in the

speech to the uses of the sheaf after it is harvested, but we can

scarcely avoid following its history a little farther than the 'grave'

which to Eliphaz seems the garner. Are all these matured powers to

have no field for action? Were all these miracles of vegetation set in

motion only in order to grow a crop which should be reaped, and there

an end? What is to be done with the precious fruit which has taken so

long time and so much cultivation to grow? Surely it is not the

intention of the Lord of the harvest to let it rot when it has been

gathered. Surely we are grown here and ripened and carried hence for

something.

But that is not in our passage. This, however, may be drawn from

it--that maturity does not depend on length of days; and, however

Eliphaz meant to promise long life, the reality is that the devout

soul may reckon on complete life, whether it be long or short. God

will not call His children home till their schooling is done; and,

however green and young the corn may seem to our eyes, He knows which

heads in the great harvest-field are ready for removal, and gathers

only these. The child whose little coffin may be carried under a boy's

arm may be ripe for harvesting. Not length of days, but likeness to

God, makes maturity; and if we die according to the will of God, it

cannot but be that we shall come to our grave in a full age, whatever

be the number of years carved on our tombstones.

The speech ends with a somewhat self-complacent exhortation to the

poor, tortured man: 'We have searched it, so it is.' We wise men

pledge our wisdom and our reputation that this is true. Great is

authority. An ounce of sympathy would have done more to commend the

doctrine than a ton of dogmatic self-confidence. 'Hear it, and know

thou it for thyself.' Take it into thy mind. Take it into thy mind and

heart, and take it for thy good. It was a frosty ending, exasperating

in its air of patronage, of superior wisdom, and in its lack of any

note of feeling. So, of course, it set Job's impatience alight, and

his next speech is more desperate than his former. When will

well-meaning comforters learn not to rub salt into wounds while they

seem to be dressing them?

Expositions of Holy Scripture Second Kings Chapters VIII to End and Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. Esther, Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes · 第 223 / 354 题