III. The Religion of Compromise or Worldliness.

They had God and they had gods. They liked the latter best. They gave

God formal worship, but they gave the others more active service.

Such a kind of religion is a type of much that we see around us; the

attempt to be Christians and worldlings, the indecision under which

many men labour all their lives, being drawn one way by their

consciences, another by their inclinations.

You cannot unite the two. God requires all. He fills the heart, and

claims supreme control over all the nature. There cannot be two

supreme in the soul. It cannot be God and self. It must be God or

self. You may look now one way and now another, but the way the heart

goes is the thing. Mr. Facing-both-ways does not really face both

ways. He only turns quickly round from one to the other.

Such divided religion is impossible in the nature of God--of the

soul--of religion.

To attempt it, then, is really to decide against God.

It is weak and unmanly to be thus vague and decided by circumstances.

You would have been a Mohammedan if you had been born in Turkey.

You ought to decide for God.

He claims, He deserves, He will reward and bless, your whole soul.

'Choose you this day whom ye will serve. If the Lord be God, follow

Him' If Baal or Succoth-benoth, then follow him. 'You cannot serve God

and Mammon.' 'He that is not for us is against us.' Be one thing or

the other.

Expositions of Holy Scripture Second Kings Chapters VIII to End and Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. Esther, Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes · 第 129 / 354 题