CHAPTER VI

FOLLOWING THE COLOUR LINE IN THE NORTH

Having followed the colour line in the South, it is of extraordinary

interest and significance to learn how the Negro fares in the North. Is he

treated better or worse? Is Boston a more favourable location for him than

Atlanta or New Orleans? A comparison of the "Southern attitude" and the

"Northern attitude" throws a flood of light upon the Negro as a national

problem in this country.

Most of the perplexing questions in the North pertain to the city, but in

the South the great problems are still agricultural. In the South the

masses of Negroes live on the land; they are a part of the cotton, sugar,

lumber and turpentine industries; but in the North the Negro is

essentially a problem of the great cities. He has taken his place in the

babel of the tenements; already he occupies extensive neighbourhoods like

the San Juan Hill district in New York and Bucktown in Indianapolis, and,

by virtue of an increasing volume of immigration from the South, he is

overflowing his boundaries in all directions, expanding more rapidly,

perhaps, than any other single element of urban population. In every

important Northern city, a distinct race-problem already exists, which

must, in a few years, assume serious proportions.

Country districts and the smaller cities in the North for the most part

have no Negro question. A few Negroes are found in almost all localities,

but an examination of the statistics of rural counties and of the lesser

cities shows that the Negro population is diminishing in some localities,

increasing slightly in others. In distinctly agricultural districts in the

North the census exhibits an actual falling off of Negro population of 10

per cent. between 1880 and 1900. Cass County in Michigan, which has a

famous Negro agricultural colony--one of the few in the North--shows a

distinct loss in population. From 1,837 inhabitants in 1880 it dropped to

1,568 in 1900. A few Negro farmers have done well in the North (at

Wilberforce, Ohio, I met two or three who had fine large farms and were

prosperous), but the rural population is so small as to be negligible.

_Negroes of Small Northern Towns_

Most of the Negroes in the smaller towns and cities of the North are of

the stock which came by way of the underground railroad just before the

Civil War or during the period of philanthropic enthusiasm which followed

it. They have come to fit naturally into the life of the communities where

they live, and no one thinks especially of their colour. There is, indeed,

no more a problem with the Negro than with the Greek or Italian. In one

community (Lansing, Mich.) with which I have been long familiar, the

Negroes are mostly mulattoes and their numbers have remained practically

stationary for thirty years, while the white population has increased

rapidly. At present there are only about 500 Negroes in a city of 25,000

people.

As a whole the coloured people of Lansing are peaceful and industrious, a

natural part of the wage-working population. Individuals have become

highly prosperous and are much respected. A few of the younger generation

are idle and worthless.

So far as comfortable conditions of life are concerned, where there is

little friction or discrimination and a good opportunity for earning a

respectable livelihood, I have found no places anywhere which seemed so

favourable to Negroes as these smaller towns and cities in the North and

West where the coloured population is not increasing. But the moment there

is new immigration from the South the conditions cease to be Utopian--as I

shall show.

The great cities of the North present a wholly different aspect; the

increases of population there are not short of extraordinary. In 1880

Chicago had only 6,480 coloured people; at present (1908) it has about

45,000, an increase of some 600 per cent. The census of 1900 gives the

Negro population of New York as 60,666. It is now (1908) probably not less

than 80,000. Between 1890 and 1900 the Negroes of Philadelphia

increased by 59 per cent., while the Caucasians added only 22 per cent.,

and the growth since 1900 has been even more rapid, the coloured

population now exceeding 80,000.

[Illustration: A NEGRO CABIN WITH EVIDENCES OF ABUNDANCE]

[Illustration: OFF FOR THE COTTON FIELDS]

It is difficult to realise the significance of these masses of coloured

population. The city of Washington to-day has a greater community of

Negroes (some 100,000) than were ever before gathered together in one

community in any part of the world, so far as we know. New York and

Philadelphia both now probably have as many Negroes as any Southern city

(except Washington, if that be called a Southern city). Nor must it be

forgotten that about a ninth of the Negro population of the United States

is in the North and West. Crowded communities of Negroes in Northern

latitudes have never before existed anywhere. Northern city conditions

therefore present unique and interesting problems.

I went first to Indianapolis because I had heard so much of the political

power of the Negroes there; afterward I visited Cincinnati, Philadelphia,

New York, Boston, Chicago and several smaller cities and country

neighbourhoods. In every large city both white and coloured people told me

that race feeling and discrimination were rapidly increasing: that new and

more difficult problems were constantly arising.

Generally speaking, the more Negroes the sharper the expression of

prejudice.

While the Negroes were an inconsequential part of the population, they

passed unnoticed, but with increasing numbers (especially of the lower

sort of Negroes and black Negroes), accompanied by competition for the

work of the city and active political power, they are inevitably kindling

the fires of race-feeling. Prejudice has been incited also by echoes of

the constant agitation in the South, the hatred-breeding speeches of

Tillman and Vardaman, the incendiary and cruel books and plays of Dixon,

and by the increased immigration of Southern white people with their

strong Southern point of view.

_Pathetic Expectations of the Negro_

One finds something unspeakably pathetic in the spectacle of these untold

thousands of Negroes who are coming North. To many of them, oppressed

within the limitations set up by the South, it is indeed the promised

land. I shall never forget the wistful eagerness of a Negro I met in

Mississippi. He told me he was planning to move to Indianapolis. I asked

him why he wanted to leave the South.

"They're Jim Crowin' us down here too much," he said; "there's no chance

for a coloured man who has any self-respect."

"But," I said, "do you know that you will be better off when you get to

Indianapolis?"

"I hear they don't make no difference up there between white folks and

coloured, and that a hard-working man can get two dollars a day. Is that

all so?"

"Yes, that's pretty nearly so," I said--but as I looked at the fairly

comfortable home he lived in, among his own people, I felt somehow that he

would not find the promised land all that he anticipated.

And after that I visited Indianapolis and other cities and saw hundreds of

just such eager Negroes after they had reached the promised land. Two

classes of coloured people came North: the worthless, ignorant,

semi-criminal sort who find in the intermittent, high-paid day labour in

the North, accompanied by the glittering excitements of city life, just

the conditions they love best. Two or three years ago the Governor of

Arkansas, Jeff Davis, pardoned a Negro criminal on condition that he would

go to Boston and stay there! The other class is composed of

self-respecting, hard-working people who are really seeking better

conditions of life, a better chance for their children.

And what do Negroes find when they reach the promised land?

In the first place the poorer sort find in Indianapolis the alley home, in

New York the deadly tenement. Landowners in Indianapolis have been

building long rows of cheap one-story frame tenements in back streets and

alleys. The apartments have two or three rooms each. When new they are

brightly painted and papered and to many Negroes from the South,

accustomed to the primitive cabin, they are beautiful indeed.

Even the older buildings are more pretentious if not really better than

anything they have known in the rural South; and how the city life, nearly

as free to the coloured man as to the white, stirs their pulses! No

people, either black or white, are really free until they feel free. And

to many Negroes the first few weeks in a Northern city give them the first

glimpses they have ever had of what they consider to be liberty.

A striking illustration of this feeling came to my notice at Columbia,

South Carolina. One of the most respected Negro men there--respected by

both races--was a prosperous tailor who owned a building on the main

street of the city. He was well to do, had a family, and his trade came

from both races. I heard that he was planning to leave the South and I

went to see him.

"Yes," he said, "I am going away. It's getting to be too dangerous for a

coloured man down here."

It was just after the Atlanta riot.

"Where are you going?" I asked.

"I think I shall go to Washington," he said.

"Why Washington?"

"Well, you see, I want to be as near the flag as I can."

_What the Negro Really Finds in the Promised Land_

But they soon begin to learn things! It is true that the workingman can

get high wages, and the domestic servant is paid an amount which

astonishes her, but on the other hand--a fact that somehow never occurs to

many of these people, or indeed to the foreigners who come flocking to our

shores--the living cost is higher. For his gaudy tenements the landlord

extorts exorbitant rentals. Ignorance is ever roundly and mercilessly

taxed! I saw a double house built for white people just on the edge of a

Negro neighbourhood and held at a rental of $18 a month, but not being

able to secure white tenants the landlord rented to Negroes for $25 a

month.

When he came North the Negro (even though he had lived in cities in the

South, as many of the immigrants have) never dreamed that it would require

such an amount of fuel to keep him through the long Northern winter, or

that his bill for lights, water, and everything else would be so high. And

in the South many Negro families of the poorer sort are greatly assisted

by baskets of food brought from the white man's kitchen and the gift of

cast-off clothes and shoes, to say nothing of tobacco, and even money--a

lingering loose survival of the relationships of slavery. But in the

North the Negro finds himself in an intense industrial atmosphere where

relationships are more strictly impersonal and businesslike. What he gets

he must pay for. Charity exists on a large scale, as I shall show later,

but it is the sharp, inquiring, organised charity of the North.

In short, coming North to find a place where he will be treated more like

a man and less like a serf, the Negro discovers that he must meet the

competitive struggle to which men of the working class are subjected in

the highly developed industrial system of the North.

_Sufferings of the Northern Negro_

In the South the great mass of Negroes have lived with their doors open,

fireplaces have kept their homes ventilated, they could leave the matter

of sanitation to fresh air and sunshine. And the Negro's very lack of

training for such an environment as that of the North causes him untold

suffering. To save fuel, and because he loves to be warm and sociable, he

and his family and friends crowd into one close room, which is kept at

fever temperature, not by a healthful fireplace, but by a tight stove.

This, with the lack of proper sanitary conveniences, often becomes a

hotbed of disease. Even in mild weather I have been in Negro houses in the

North where the air was almost unendurably warm and impure.

I know of nothing more tragic than the condition of the swarming newer

Negro populations of Northern cities--the more tragic because the Negro is

so cheerful and patient about it all. I looked into the statistics closely

in several of them, and in no instance does the birth-rate keep pace with

the death-rate. Even allowing for the fact that birth statistics are not

very accurately kept in most cities it is probable that if it were not for

the immigration constantly rolling upward from the South the Negro

population in Northern cities would show a falling off. Consumption and

the diseases of vice ravage their numbers. One of the ablest Negro

physicians I have met, Dr. S. A. Furniss, who has practised among his

people in Indianapolis for many years, has made a careful study of

conditions. In a paper read before a medical association Dr. Furniss

says:

"The reports of the Indianapolis Board of Health show that for no month in

the last ten years has the birth-rate among Negroes equalled the

death-rate."

Here are the statistics from 1901 to 1905:

Deaths Births

1901 332 279

1902 329 280

1903 448 283

1904 399 327

1905 443 384

_"Race Suicide" Among Negroes_

From inquiries that I have made everywhere in the North there would seem,

indeed, to be a tendency to "race suicide" among Negroes as among the old

American white stock. Especially is this true among the better class

Negroes. The ignorant Negro in Southern agricultural districts is

exceedingly prolific, but his Northern city brother has comparatively few

children. I have saved the record from personal inquiry of perhaps two

hundred Northern Negro families of the better class. Many have no children

at all, many have one or two, and the largest family I found (in Boston)

was seven children. I found one Negro family in the South with twenty-one

children! Industrialism, of course, is not favourable to a large

birth-rate. All Northern cities show a notable surplus, according to the

statistics, of Negro women over Negro men. Many of these are house

servants and, like the large class of roving single men who do day labour

on the streets and railroads, they are without family ties and have no

children.

Dr. Furniss finds that the deaths of Negroes from tuberculosis constitute

over half the total deaths from that cause in the city of Indianapolis,

whereas, in proportion to Negro population, they should constitute only

one-eighth.

His observations upon these startling facts are of great interest:

"I believe the reason for these conditions is plain. First of all it is

due to Negroes leaving the country and crowding into the larger cities,

especially in the North, where they live in a climate totally different

from that with which they have been familiar. They occupy unsanitary

homes; they are frequently compelled to labour with insufficient food and

clothing and without proper rest. Of necessity they follow the hardest

and most exposed occupations in order to make a livelihood. I regret to

say that intemperance and immorality play a part in making these figures

what they are. They easily fall victim to the unusual vices of the city.

"Another reason for increased mortality is improper medical attention. Not

only among the ignorant but among the intelligent we find too much trust

put in patent medicines; the belief, latent it is true in many cases, but

still existing among the ignorant, in the hoodoo militates against the

close following of the doctor's orders.

"What shall we do about it?" asks Dr. Furniss. "We must urge those around

us to more personal cleanliness, insist on a pure home life, and less

dissipation and intemperance: to have fewer picnics and save more money

for a rainy day. Tell the young people in the South not to come to

Northern cities, but to go to the smaller towns of the West, where they

can have a fair chance. Unless something is done to change existing

conditions, to stop this movement to our Northern cities, to provide

proper habitations and surroundings for those who are already here, it

will be only a question of time until the problem of the American Negro

will reach a solution not at all desirable from our point of view."

Of course a doctor always sees the pathological side of life and his view

is likely to be pessimistic. I saw much of the tragedy of the slum Negroes

in the cities of the North, and yet many Negroes have been able to

survive, many have learned how to live in towns and are making a success

of their lives--as I shall show more particularly in the next chapter. It

must not be forgotten that Negro families in Boston and Philadelphia

(mostly mulattoes, it is true) as well as in Charleston, Savannah, and New

Orleans, have lived and thrived under city conditions for many

generations. Not a few Negroes in Indianapolis whose homes I visited are

housed better than the average of white families.

_Sickness Among Northern Negroes_

Not only is the death-rate high in the North, but the Negro is hampered by

sickness to a much greater degree than white people. Hospital records in

Philadelphia show an excess of Negro patients over whites, according to

population, of 125 per cent. About 5,000 Negroes passed through the

hospitals of Philadelphia last year, averaging a confinement of three

weeks each. Mr. Warner, in _American Charities_, makes sickness the chief

cause of poverty among coloured people in New York, Boston, New Haven, and

Baltimore. The percentage of sickness was twice or more as high as that of

Germans, Irish, or white Americans.

Such are the pains of readjustment which the Negroes are having to bear in

the North.

A question arises whether they can ever become a large factor of the

population in Northern latitudes. They are certainly not holding their own

in the country or in the smaller cities, and in the large cities they are

increasing at present, not by the birth-rate, but by constant immigration.

Hostile physical conditions of life in the North are not the only

difficulties that the Negro has to meet. He thought he left prejudice

behind in the South, but he finds it also showing its teeth here in the

North. And, as in the South, a wide difference is apparent between the

attitude of the best class of white men and the lower class.

_How Northerners Regard the Negro_

One of the first things that struck me when I began studying race

conditions in the North was the position of the better class of white

people with regard to the Negro. In the South every white man and woman

has a vigorous and vital opinion on the race question. You have only to

apply the match, the explosion is sure to follow. It is not so in the

North. A few of the older people still preserve something of the war-time

sentiment for the Negro; but the people one ordinarily meets don't know

anything about the Negro, don't discuss him, and don't care about him. In

Indianapolis, and indeed in other cities, the only white people I could

find who were much interested in the Negroes were a few politicians,

mostly of the lower sort, the charity workers and the police. But that, of

course, is equally true of the Russian Jews or the Italians. One of the

first white men with whom I talked (at Indianapolis) said to me with some

impatience:

"There are too many Negroes up here; they hurt the city."

Another told me of the increasing presence of Negroes in the parks, on the

streets, and in the street cars. He said:

"I suppose sooner or later we shall have to adopt some of the restrictions

of the South."

He said it without heat, but as a sort of tentative conclusion, he hadn't

fully made up his mind.

_Race Prejudice in Boston_

In Boston, of all places, I expected to find much of the old sentiment. It

does exist among some of the older men and women, but I was surprised at

the general attitude which I encountered. It was one of hesitation and

withdrawal. Summed up, I think the feeling of the better class of people

in Boston (and elsewhere in Northern cities) might be thus stated:

We have helped the Negro to liberty; we have helped to educate him; we

have encouraged him to stand on his own feet. Now let's see what he can do

for himself. After all, he must survive or perish by his own efforts.

In short, they have "cast the bantling on the rocks."

Though they still preserve the form of encouraging the Negro, the spirit

seems to have fled. Not long ago the Negroes of Boston organised a concert

at which Theodore Drury, a coloured musician of really notable

accomplishments, was to appear. Aristocratic white people were appealed to

and bought a considerable number of tickets; but on the evening of the

concert the large block of seats purchased by white people was

conspicuously vacant. Northern white people would seem to be more

interested in the distant Southern Negro than in the Negro at their doors.

Before I take up the cruder and more violent expressions of prejudice on

the part of the lower class of white men in the North I want to show the

beginnings of cold-shouldering as it exists in varying degrees in Northern

cities, and especially in Boston, the old centre of abolitionism.

Superficially, at least, the Negro in Boston still enjoys the widest

freedom; but after one gets down to real conditions he finds much

complaint and alarm on the part of Negroes over growing restrictions.

Boston exercises no discrimination on the street cars, on railroads, or in

theatres or other places of public gathering. The schools are absolutely

free. A coloured woman, Miss Maria Baldwin, is the principal of the

Agassiz school, of Cambridge, attended by 600 white children. I heard her

spoken of in the highest terms by the white people. Eight Negro teachers,

chosen through the ordinary channels of competitive examination, teach in

the public schools. There are Negro policemen, Negro firemen, Negro

officeholders--fully as many of them as the proportion of Negro population

in Boston would warrant. A Negro has served as commander of a white post

of the Grand Army.

_Prosperous Negroes in Boston_

Several prosperous Negro business men have won a large white patronage.

One of the chief merchant-tailoring stores of Boston, with a location on

Washington Street which rents for $10,000 a year, is owned by J. H. Lewis.

He has been in business many years. He employs both white and Negro

workmen and clerks and he has some of the best white trade in Boston. Not

long ago he went to North Carolina and bought the old plantation where his

father was a slave, and he even talks of going there to spend his old age.

Another Negro, Gilbert H. Harris, conducts the largest wig-making

establishment in New England. I visited his place. He employs coloured

girls and his trade is exclusively white. Another Negro has a school of

pharmacy in which all the students are white; another, George Hamm, has a

prosperous news and stationery store. A dentist, Dr. Grant, who has a

reputation in his profession for a cement which he invented, was formerly

in the faculty of the Harvard dentistry school and now enjoys a good

practice among white people. The real estate dealer who has the most

extensive business in Cambridge, T. H. Raymond, is a Negro. He employs

white clerks and his business is chiefly with white people. Two or three

Negro lawyers, Butler Wilson in particular, have many white clients. Dr.

Courtney, a coloured physician from the Harvard Medical School, was for a

time house physician of the Boston Lying-in-Hospital, in which the

patients were practically all white, and has now a practice which includes

both white and coloured patients. Dr. Courtney has also served on the

School Board of Boston, an important elective office. The Negro poet,

William Stanley Braithwaite, whose father took a degree at Oxford

(England), is a member of the Authors' Club of Boston. His poems have

appeared in various magazines, he has written a volume of poems, a

standard anthology of Elizabethan verse, and he is about to publish a

critical study of the works of William Dean Howells. Several of these men

meet white people socially more or less.

I give these examples to show the place occupied by the better and older

class of Boston Negroes. Most of those I have mentioned are mulattoes,

some very light. It shows what intelligent Negroes can do for themselves

in a community where there has been little or no prejudice against them.

But with crowding new immigration, and incited by all the other causes I

have mentioned, these conditions are rapidly changing.

A few years ago no hotel or restaurant in Boston refused Negro guests; now

several hotels, restaurants, and especially confectionery stores, will not

serve Negroes, even the best of them. The discrimination is not made

openly, but a Negro who goes to such places is informed that there are no

accommodations, or he is overlooked and otherwise slighted, so that he

does not come again. A strong prejudice exists against renting flats and

houses in many white neighbourhoods to coloured people. The Negro in

Boston, as in other cities, is building up "quarters," which he occupies

to the increasing exclusion of other classes of people. The great Negro

centre is now in the South End, a locality once occupied by some of the

most aristocratic families of Boston. And yet, as elsewhere, they struggle

for the right to live where they please. A case in point is that of Mrs.

Mattie A. McAdoo, an educated coloured woman, almost white, who has

travelled abroad, and is a woman of refinement. She had a flat in an

apartment house among white friends. One of the renters, a Southern woman,

finding out that Mrs. McAdoo had coloured blood, objected. The landlord

refused to cancel Mrs. McAdoo's lease and the white woman left, but the

next year Mrs. McAdoo found that she could not re-rent her apartment. The

landlord in this instance was the son of an abolitionist. He said to her:

"You know I have no prejudice against coloured people. I will rent you an

apartment in the building where I myself live if you want it, but I can't

let you into my other buildings, because the tenants object."

An attempt was even made a year or so ago by white women to force Miss

Baldwin, the coloured school principal to whom I have referred, and who is

almost one of the institutions of Boston, to leave Franklin House, where

she was living. No one incident, perhaps, awakened Boston to the existence

of race prejudice more sharply than this.

_Churches Draw the Colour Line_

One would think that the last harbour of prejudice would be the churches,

and yet I found strange things in Boston. There are, and have been for a

long time, numerous coloured churches in Boston, but many Negroes,

especially those of the old families, have belonged to the white churches.

In the last two years increased Negro attendance, especially at the

Episcopal churches, has become a serious problem. A quarter of the

congregation of the Church of the Ascension is coloured and the vicar has

had to refuse any further coloured attendance at the Sunday School. St.

Peter's and St. Philip's Churches in Cambridge have also been confronted

with the colour problem.

A proposition is now afoot to establish a Negro mission which shall

gradually grow into a separate coloured Episcopal Church, a movement which

causes much bitterness among the coloured people. I shall not soon forget

the expression of hopelessness in the face of a prominent white church

leader as he exclaimed:

"What _shall_ we do with these Negroes! I for one would like to have them

stay. I believe it is in accordance with the doctrine of Christ, but the

proportion is growing so large that white people are drifting away from

us. Strangers avoid us. Our organisation is expensive to keep up and the

Negroes are able to contribute very little in proportion to their

numbers. Think about it yourself: What shall we do? If we allow the

Negroes to attend freely it means that eventually all the white people

will leave and we shall have a Negro church whether we want it or not."

In no other city are there any considerable number of Negroes who attend

white churches--except a few Catholic churches. At New Orleans, I have

seen white and coloured people worshipping together at the cathedrals.

White ministers sometimes have spasms of conscience that they are not

doing all they should for the Negro.

Let me tell two significant incidents from Philadelphia. The worst Negro

slum in that city is completely surrounded by business houses and the

homes of wealthy white people. Within a few blocks of it stand several of

the most aristocratic churches of Philadelphia. Miss Bartholomew conducts

a neighbourhood settlement in the very centre of this social bog. Twice

during the many years she has been there white ministers have ventured

down from their churches. One of them said he had been troubled by the

growing masses of ignorant coloured people.

"Can't I do something to help?"

Miss Bartholomew was greatly pleased and cheered.

"Of course you can," she said heartily. "We're trying to keep some of the

Negro children off the streets. There is plenty of opportunity for helping

with our boys' and girls' clubs and classes."

"Oh, I didn't mean that," said the minister; "I thought, in cases of death

in their families, we might offer to read the burial service."

And he went away and did not see the humour of it!

Another minister made a similar proposition: he wanted to establish a

Sunday School for coloured people. He asked Miss Bartholomew anxiously

where he could hold it.

"Why not in your church in the afternoon?"

"Why, we couldn't do that!" he exclaimed; "we should have to air all the

cushions afterward!"

But to return to Boston. A proposition was recently made to organise for

coloured people a separate Y. M. C. A., but the white members voted

against any such discrimination. Yet a coloured man said to me

hopelessly:

"It's only delayed. Next time we shall be put off with a separate

institution."

_Colour Line at Harvard_

Even at Harvard where the Negro has always enjoyed exceptional

opportunities, conditions are undergoing a marked change. A few years ago

a large class of white students voluntarily chose a brilliant Negro

student, R. C. Bruce, as valedictorian. But last year a Negro baseball

player was the cause of so much discussion and embarrassment to the

athletic association that there will probably never be another coloured

boy on the university teams. The line has already been drawn, indeed, in

the medical department. Although a coloured doctor only a few years ago

was house physician at the Boston Lying-in-Hospital, coloured students are

no longer admitted to that institution. One of them, Dr. Welker (an Iowa

coloured man), cannot secure his degree because he hasn't had six

obstetrical cases, and he can't get the six cases because he isn't

admitted with his white classmates to the Lying-in-Hospital. It is a

curious fact that not only the white patients but some Negro patients

object to the coloured doctors. In a recent address which has awakened

much sharp comment among Boston Negroes, President Eliot of Harvard

indicated his sympathy with the general policy of separate education in

the South by remarking that if Negro students were in the majority at

Harvard, or formed a large proportion of the total number, some separation

of the races might follow.

And this feeling is growing, notwithstanding the fact that no Negro

student has ever disgraced Harvard and that no students are more orderly

or law-abiding than the Negroes. On the other hand, Negro students have

frequently made distinguished records for scholarship: last year one of

them, Alain Leroy Locke, who took the course in three years, won the first

of the three Bowdoin prizes (the most important bestowed at Harvard) for a

literary essay, and passed for his degree with a _magna cum laude_. Since

then he has been accepted, after a brilliant competitive examination, for

the Rhodes scholarship from the state of Pennsylvania.

Such feeling as that which is developing in the North comes hard, indeed,

upon the intelligent, educated, ambitious Negro--especially if he happens

to have, as a large proportion of these Negroes do have, no little white

blood. Many coloured people in Boston are so white that they cannot be

told from white people, yet they are classed as Negroes.

Accompanying this change of attitude, this hesitation and withdrawal of

the better class of white men, one finds crude sporadic outbreaks on the

part of the rougher element of white men--who have merely a different way

of expressing themselves.

_White Gangs Attack Negroes_

In Indianapolis the Negro comes in contact with the "bungaloo gangs,"

crowds of rough and lawless white boys who set upon Negroes and beat them

frightfully, often wholly without provocation. Although no law prevents

Negroes from entering any park in Indianapolis, they are practically

excluded from at least one of them by the danger of being assaulted by

these gangs.

The street cars are free in all Northern cities, but the Negro

nevertheless sometimes finds it dangerous to ride with white people.

Professor R. R. Wright, Jr., himself a Negro, and an acute observer of

Negro conditions, tells this personal experience:

"I came out on the car from the University of Pennsylvania one evening in

May about eight o'clock. Just as the car turned off Twenty-seventh to

Lombard Street, a crowd of about one hundred little white boys from six to

about fourteen years of age attacked it. The car was crowded, but there

were only about a dozen Negroes on it, about half of them women. The mob

of boys got control of the car by pulling off the trolley. They threw

stones into the car, and finally some of them boarded the car and began to

beat the Negroes with sticks, shouting as they did so, 'Kill the nigger!'

'Lynch 'em!' 'Hit that nigger!' etc. This all happened in Philadelphia.

Doubtless these urchins had been reading in the daily papers the cry 'Kill

the Negro!' and they were trying to carry out the injunction."

While I was in Indianapolis a clash of enough importance to be reported in

the newspapers occurred between the races on a street car; and in New

York, in the San Juan Hill district, one Sunday evening I saw an incident

which illustrates the almost instinctive race antagonism which exists in

Northern cities. The street was crowded. Several Negro boys were playing

on the pavement. Stones were thrown. Instantly several white boys sided

together and began to advance on the Negroes. In less time than it takes

to tell it thirty or forty white boys and young men were chasing the

Negroes down the street. At the next corner the Negroes were joined by

dozens of their own race. Stones and sticks began to fly everywhere, and

if it hadn't been for the prompt action of two policemen there would have

been a riot similar to those which have occurred not once but many times

in New York City during the past two years. Of course these instances are

exceptional, but none the less significant.

_Bumptiousness as a Cause of Hatred_

Some of the disturbances grow out of a characteristic of a certain sort of

Negro, the expression of which seems to stir the deepest animosity in the

city white boy. And that is the bumptiousness, the airiness, of the

half-ignorant young Negro, who, feeling that he has rights, wants to be

occupied constantly in using them. He mistakes liberty for licence.

Although few in numbers among thousands of quiet coloured people, he makes

a large showing. In the South they call him the "smart Negro," and an

almost irresistible instinct exists among white boys of a certain class to

take him down. I remember walking in Indianapolis with an educated

Northern white man. We met a young Negro immaculately dressed; his

hat-band was blue and white; his shoes were patent leather with white

tops; he wore a flowered waistcoat, and his tread as he walked was

something to see.

"Do you know," said my companion, "I never see that young fellow without

wanting to step up and knock his head off. I know something about him. He

is absolutely worthless: he does no work, but lives on the wages of a

hard-working coloured woman and spends all he can get on his clothes. I

know the instinct is childish, but I am just telling you how I feel. I'm

not sure it is racial prejudice; I presume I should feel much the same way

toward a Frenchman if he did the same thing. And somehow I can't help

believing that a good thrashing would improve that boy's character."

I'm telling this incident just as it happened, to throw a side-light on

one of the manifestations of the growing prejudice. One more illustration:

Miss Eaton conducts a social settlement for Negroes in Boston. One day a

teacher said to one of the little Negro boys in her class:

"Please pick up my handkerchief."

The boy did not stir; she again requested him to pick up the handkerchief;

then she asked him why he refused.

"The days of slavery are over," he said.

Now, this spirit is not common, but it exists, and it injures the Negro

people out of all proportion to its real seriousness.

In certain towns in Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, on the borders of the old

South, the feeling has reached a stage still more acute. At Springfield,

O., two race riots have occurred, in the first of which a Negro was

lynched and in the second many Negroes were driven out of town and a row

of coloured tenements was burned. There are counties and towns where no

Negro is permitted to stop over night. At Syracuse, O., Lawrenceburg,

Ellwood, and Salem, Ind., for example, Negroes have not been permitted to

live for years. If a Negro appears he is warned of conditions, and if he

does not leave immediately, he is visited by a crowd of boys and men and

forced to leave. A farmer who lives within a few miles of Indianapolis

told me of a meeting, held only a short time ago by thirty-five farmers in

his neighbourhood, in which an agreement was passed to hire no Negroes,

nor to permit Negroes to live anywhere in the region.

_Story of a Northern Race Riot_

I stopped at Greensburg, Ind., on my way East and found there a remarkable

illustration showing just how feeling arises in the North. Greensburg is a

comfortable, well-to-do, conservative, church-going old town in eastern

Indiana. Many of the residents are retired farmers. The population of

7,000 is mostly of pure American stock, largely of Northern origin. And

yet last April this quiet old town was shaken by a race riot. I made

careful inquiries as to conditions there and I was amazed to discover how

closely this small disturbance paralleled the greater riot at Atlanta

which I have already written about. Negroes had lived in Greensburg for

many years, a group of self-respecting, decent, prosperous men and women.

They were known to and highly regarded by their white neighbours. One of

them, named Brooks, owned a barber shop and was janitor for the

Presbyterian Church and for one of the banks. Another, George W. Edwards,

whom I met, has been for years an employee in the Garland Mills.

"There isn't a better citizen in town than Edwards," a white lawyer told

me; and I heard the same thing from other white men.

Another Negro, George Guess, is an engineer in the electric light plant.

Of the local Negro boys, Robert Lewis, the first coloured graduate of the

local schools, is now teaching engineering at Hampton Institute. Oscar

Langston, another Negro boy, is a dentist in Indianapolis. These and other

Negroes live in good homes, support a church and have a respectable

society of their own. I found just such a body of good coloured people in

Atlanta.

Well, progress brought an electric railroad to Greensburg. To work on this

and on improvements made by the railroad hundreds of labourers were

required. And they were Negroes of the ignorant, wandering, unlooked-after

sort so common in similar occupations in the South. When the work was

finished a considerable number of them remained in Greensburg. Now

Greensburg, like other American cities, was governed by a mayor who was a

"good fellow," and who depended on two influences to elect him: party

loyalty and the saloon vote. He allowed a Negro dive to exist in one part

of the town, where the idle and worthless Negroes congregated, where a

murder was committed about a year before the riot. Exactly like Decatur

Street in Atlanta! A rotten spot always causes trouble sooner or later.

Good citizens protested and objected--to no purpose. They even organised a

Good Citizenship League, the purpose of which was to secure a better

enforcement of law. But the saloon interests were strong and wanted to

sell whiskey and beer to the Negroes, and the city authorities were

complaisant.

"Who cares," one of them asked, "about a few worthless Negroes?"

But in a democracy people _must_ care for one another.

_A Negro Crime in the North_

One day last April a Negro labourer who had been working for Mrs. Sefton,

a highly respected widow who lived alone, appeared in the house in broad

daylight and criminally assaulted her. His name was John Green, a Kentucky

Negro; he was not only ignorant, but half-witted; he had already committed

a burglary and had not been punished. He was easily caught, convicted, and

sentenced. But the town was angry. On April 30th a crowd of men and boys

gathered, beat two or three Negroes, and drove many out of town. They

never thought of mobbing the city officials who had allowed the Negro

dives to exist. And, as in Atlanta, the decent Negroes suffered with the

criminals: a crowd broke windows in the home of George Edwards, and

threatened other respectable coloured men. As in Atlanta, the better white

people were horrified and scandalised; but, as in Atlanta, the white men

who made up the mob went unpunished (though Atlanta did mildly discipline

a few rioters). As in Atlanta, the newspaper reports that were sent out

made no distinction between the different sorts of Negroes. The entire

Negro population of Greensburg was blamed for the crime of a single

ignorant and neglected man. I have several different newspaper reports of

the affair from outside papers, and nearly all indicate in the headlines

that all the Negroes in Greensburg were concerned in the riot and were

driven out of town, which was not, of course, true. As a matter of fact

the respectable Negroes are still living in Greensburg on friendly terms

with the white people.

_Human Nature North and South_

In fact, the more I see of conditions North and South, the more I see that

human nature north of Mason and Dixon's line is not different from human

nature south of the line.

Different degrees of prejudice, it is true, are apparent in the two

sections. In the South the social and political prejudice the natural

result of the memories of slavery and reconstruction, of the greater mass

of Negro population and of the backward economic development, is stronger.

In the North, on the other hand, comparatively little social and political

prejudice is apparent; but the Negro has a hard fight to get anything but

the most subservient place in the economic machine.

Over and over again, while I was in the South, I heard remarks like this:

"Down here we make the Negro keep his place socially, but in the North you

won't let him work."

This leads me to one of the most important phases of race-relationship in

the North--that is, the economic struggle of the Negro, suddenly thrown,

as he has been, into the swift-moving, competitive conditions of Northern

cities. Does he, or can he, survive? Do the masses of Negroes now coming

North realise their ambitions? Is it true that the North will not let the

Negro work?

These questions must, perforce, be discussed in another chapter.

Following the color line · 第 6 / 14 章