I will not go so far as to affirm that the prevalent systems of our

schools will certainly make vain, ambitious, worldly minded men of our

sons, and actresses and _figurantes_ of our daughters, rather than

qualify the boys for fulfilling all their moral and religious duties

in the best possible manner, and the girls for becoming modest,

virtuous, intelligent, exemplary wives and mothers. But I _will say_,

that if these systems do not work such mischief in most cases, it will

be more owing to some powerfully counteracting anterior cause, over

which they have had no control, than to the doctrines which they

inculcate, the branches of human learning which they most recommend,

or the practices which they cause to be followed. It is entirely

immaterial _what_, or _how much_ instruction they profess to give, or

really do impart in all other things, but such as will insure the

fulfilment of our moral and religious duties; the vital objects of all

correct Education will be utterly lost, if matters are so managed in

our schools, that the ever restless, insatiate desire for general

admiration becomes the main spring of action, rather than the love of

knowledge for its own sake, and for the power it will give us of

contributing to human happiness. If once _such_ desire be substituted

for _such_ love, the fountain head of our whole conduct is literally

poisoned. No pure water can possibly flow from such a source; no

essential good--none I mean, which can impart real value to character,

or contribute one mite towards the eternal felicity of the individual,

can ever be effected by him. The only result to be calculated on with

any certainty is, that an eager pursuit of merely external arts and

showy attainments, will take the place of sincere, steady, deep

solicitude to enrich the heart and adorn the understanding with all

those principles of really useful knowledge and exemplary conduct,

which alone can fit us both for time and eternity. Let the project be

tried when, where, and by whom it may, of stamping indelibly on the

human heart such principles of action as all admit it should have, at

least all whose opinions should be regarded in so momentous and vital

a concern, and it will prove abortive as certainly as it is

undertaken, unless "religion, pure and undefiled" as it came from the

voice of God himself, be made the basis of the whole proceeding. _Is

this generally done in our schools, either public or private?_ I most

conscientiously believe it is not--at least, as the gospel commands

us--"line upon line, and precept upon precept;" or even as a matter to

be taught first and above all others. But if any man attempt "_to

build on other foundation_,"--if he strive ever so much to erect the

edifice of Education on any other groundwork, he may possibly rear a

very showy and even attractive house, but most assuredly his materials

will be nothing better than "straw and stubble," continually liable to

take fire from every flying spark--forever in danger of being blown

down by every assailing wind.

In determining on the proper course of Education for our children, is

it not of the highest importance, first to decide in regard to the

situations in which they will probably be placed, and the

circumstances under which they are most likely to spend their lives,

that all the instruction given may have some bearing on such

destination--some peculiar aptitude to fit them for the particular

stations which they will fill? Until society is organized differently

from what it is, all the various honest trades, professions and

callings into which it is divided, must have persons specially

educated for them. But how can this all essential plan be

accomplished, if our children are made too proud for any thing but

playing ladies and gentlemen, or following some two or three

professional pursuits, distinguished from the rest by the dignified

title--"_liberal_?" Ought it to suffice with people in their sober

senses, to hear it urged in opposition to so reasonable a scheme as

that of adapting early Education to the probable destiny of each

individual in after life, that _in our country_ every child ought to

be educated for all imaginable conditions in what is called high life,

because any, possibly, may be attained by any? Surely this would be

the perfection of folly, unless it amounted almost to certainty that a

very large majority of our youth of both sexes would reach such

elevated situations. But it so happens that there is a moral certainty

the other way, and that an infinitely larger portion of mankind will

live and die in obscurity, than can ever become conspicuous for the

possession of wealth, extraordinary talent, or official station. This

obscurity however, would be no bar to the enjoyment of great

happiness, provided half the pains were taken to inculcate principles,

tastes and habits suitable to the future circumstances in which they

would probably be placed, that are very frequently taken to impress

their minds with insatiate cravings after all the highest conditions

of society. _This world_, and this alone, with all its vanities,

follies, and seductive vices, is made the God of their idolatry; and

every thing in future life which is calculated to impede their

worship, becomes a source of unavailing discontent, if not of actual

and lasting misery. To pursue such a course with children is little

short of real madness, even on the supposition that there is no other

state of existence but the present; unless indeed, this life had been

made a scene of uninterrupted enjoyment, instead of one abounding with

much unavoidable suffering--a scene in which to escape sickness, pain,

and poverty, is among our greatest blessings--a scene whose modicum of

happiness consists not in any of those merely selfish, sensual

pursuits, so generally deemed the chief good of life, but in the

diligent culture and exercise of all the powers of our mind--of all

the best affections of our hearts. How is this to be done, especially

in our female schools, which in fact are the great laboratories for

forming elementary teachers for our whole population,--if nearly, or

quite half the time of the pupils be taken up in learning to dance, to

draw, to play on musical instruments, and to acquire polite manners,

by going at stated times to private assemblies, to plays, and operas,

as we have heard is the practice in some city schools. One of two

things invariably follows from this course; either the whole stock of

accomplishments, (as they are called,) however costly it may have

been, is entirely abandoned the moment the girls get married, because

the acquisition has always been to them a kind of up-hill work, for

which they had not the smallest taste--or, such a passionate fondness

is contracted for them, that they can find pleasure in no other

occupation. The fatal disease of discontent is the result in both

those cases. But suppose the last to be the most common. Are domestic

habits, so indispensable to the comfort and happiness of married life,

to be formed by acquiring a passion for public spectacles, for

company-keeping, and for all the preparatory equipments of costly

apparel, and other personal decorations? Can the tranquil pleasures of

retirement, the occupations of housekeeping, the necessary management

of all the domiciliary concerns of which the mistresses of families

must always take cognizance, have any charms for ladies educated in

what is called the fashionable style? Will not all such things rather

be insupportably irksome, if not actually disgusting? How will such

ladies be prepared to meet the numerous inconveniences and troubles,

the many unpleasant, and often painful occurrences that take place,

sometimes even in the happiest families? How can they bear all the

fatigues, the various trials of temper, the actual labors incident to

domestic life, if the sole object of the chief lessons which they have

received at school, has been to attract attention and admiration to

themselves? What, but the most inordinate selfishness and vanity can

be the fruit of such training? Will such preparatory studies teach

them how to keep their houses and families in order--to train their

offspring in the paths of knowledge and virtue--to administer

consolation to the sick and the dying--in a word, to turn all the

numerous incidents of domestic life to the moral and religious

improvement of those over whom it is their business and sacred duty to

exercise a constant and parental supervision? Alas! my friends, there

is scarcely any thing in all nature so illy qualified to fulfil these

momentous obligations, as a young lady educated in what is called the

fashionable style--unless, by the providence of God, she may have been

first imbued under the parental roof, with moral and religious

principles too strong to be overcome by such powerful engines of

destruction as are constantly at work to destroy them, in what are

called, by way of pre-eminence, "fashionable schools." I do not mean

to say that the extirpation of moral and religious principle is really

the object there aimed at. No, far from it; for I dare affirm that

many of the persons thus busily engaged, perhaps the whole of them,

really believe that they are fast accomplishing a very great and good

work. But the sum and substance of it, when stript of all its vain

illusions, is nothing more nor less, in fact, than a very laborious

and excessively expensive process to unfit the unfortunate subjects of

it for every kind of life but such as they are taught to lead at

school; _and that is_, to value all merely external acquirements far

above every moral qualification, and to seek their chief happiness in

the amount of admiration they can procure for these very superficial

and comparatively worthless attainments. They come forth admirably

prepared for a life of alternate excitement and gratification; but for

the real Christian life of self-control, self-denial, and humble

righteousness, they probably have not so much as heard of it, unless

perchance when they have gone to church. They can use their hands,

feet and eyes most exquisitely in attracting admiration; but when

compelled to apply themselves to any of the homely, but really

essential purposes of life, they find themselves most sadly

embarrassed, if not utterly at a loss how to proceed. Are the poor

girls to blame for all this? Far from it; they must have been

something more or less than human beings to turn out differently. The

fault--nay, I must call it the crime--if such misapplication of the

talents which God has given them for far different purposes be

criminal, lies chiefly at the parent's door. _But for them_ there

would be no such course of Education in the world. It is indeed a

course which prepares them admirably for what may truly be called

_public life_; instead of qualifying them to adorn that which is

almost entirely private and domestic--that in which an immense

majority of females are destined to live and to die. What is the

consequence of this incongruity--this manifest disagreement between

the matters taught, and the ends to which they must generally be

applied? What is the aptitude of the means to the great purposes which

parents should aim to accomplish? Are they favorable or not to

domestic happiness? If music, drawing, dressing, and dancing, with a

smattering of some living foreign language, garnished with a few

beggarly elements of Natural Philosophy, Chemistry, Geology, and

Botany, are the principal ingredients in _this happiness_, then are

the chief pursuits of fashionable female Education eminently

calculated to promote it. But if the following view from one of our

most distinguished moral and religious writers of what female

Education _should be_, has any truth or justice in it, our prevalent

systems of fashionable Education exhibit a most lamentable deficiency

in almost all essential points. This admirable writer says, in the

form of advice to a young man--"For my own part, I call

_Education_--not that which smothers a woman with accomplishments, but

that which tends to consolidate a firm and regular system of

character--that which tends to form a friend, a companion, a wife. I

call Education, not that which is made of the shreds and patches of

useless arts, but that which inculcates principles, polishes taste,

regulates temper, cultivates reason, subdues the passions, directs the

feelings, habituates to reflection, trains to self-denial, and _more

especially_, that which refers all actions, feelings, sentiments,

tastes, and passions to the love and fear of God." Elsewhere the same

author remarks--"In character as in architecture, just proportion is

beauty. The ornaments which decorate, do not _support_ the edifice."

Again it is said--"A man of sense who loves home, and lives at home,

requires a wife who can and will be at half the expense of mind

necessary for keeping up the cheerful, animating, elegant intercourse

which forms so great a part of the bond of union between intellectual

and well bred persons. The _exhibiting, the displaying wife_ may

entertain your company; but it is only the informed, the refined, the

cultivated woman, who can entertain yourself; and I presume whenever

you marry, you will marry primarily for _yourself_, and not for _your

friends_; you will want a companion--_an artist you may hire_."

Should any person doubt the preference usually given to what are

called accomplishments, over matters of infinitely higher real value,

let them ask as many pupils as they please, "what inquiries do your

parents, guardians, and friends most frequently make relative to your

studies and progress at school?" The answers will furnish undeniable

proof; for a very large proportion will be found to have been

substantially like the following: "How do you come on in your Music,

your Dancing, your Drawing, or your French?" according as they have

been striving to acquire one or more of these inestimable outfits for

their progress through Time to the realms of Eternity. It is pitiable,

most pitiable, to see the thousands of innocent little girls

throughout our country, many of them without the slightest taste or

talent for these things, still laboring four, five, or six hours in

every twenty-four, to gain a little elementary knowledge of what they

will generally abandon immediately after leaving school, or at

farthest, as soon as they get married--to gain which knowledge has

been the chief object, the painful toil for so many irrevocable years

of all this warring against nature, common sense, and moral fitness.

But suppose the success of such training as ample as heart can wish,

and the poor little creatures are made prodigies of early proficiency

in arts, which are very soon to be of little or no real use to them?

Is it politic--is it wise--in fact, is it not a most sinful breach of

parental duty, to impart to our daughters, as among the most desirable

things in life, strong tastes which they can scarcely gratify at all

without frequently seeking company abroad, nor often indulge at home,

unless by neglecting some of those important, indispensable domestic

employments which devolve exclusively on the mistress of the family?

Let it not be inferred from any of the foregoing remarks, that I am an

enemy to what are called fashionable schools--my enmity extends _only

to some of their practices_. Let _them_ be reformed, and I shall have

no enmity whatever to the title "fashionable," if it be deemed

essential to gain scholars for those who keep them. Let them make it

fashionable to fit their pupils for private life, and for all its

necessary duties, by giving them genuine moral and religious

principles first and above all things; then let accomplishments follow

in their proper, but very subordinate place, and they will have no

warmer friend than myself.

I am well aware that I subject myself to the charge of great

presumption in censuring, as I have done, many of the principal

matters taught at present in fashionable, as well as other schools,

both for boys and girls; and to this charge I am prepared patiently to

submit, provided it be made, if at all, after a full, fair, and candid

examination of all that I have said on these topics. To retract

however, my accusations, will be impossible, unless I could rid myself

of the conscientious belief, and thorough conviction, that not only

the temporal, but eternal happiness, both of the present and future

generations, depends on a radical change being made in regard to the

principal objects of Education, as well as in the means of attaining

them. These _must be_ to prepare us for this life--not as an _end_,

but only as the means of attaining happiness in the next.

My business, however, being more to point out faults, than

remedies--rather to describe diseases, than to offer nostrums for

their removal, I shall leave the curative process to other hands,

sincerely hoping that it may be attempted by some much abler moral

physicians, who will apply themselves to the Herculean task with a

degree of zeal, vigor, and perseverance fully commensurate to the

difficulty and vital importance of the undertaking. There can be no

greater object of human ambition--no more exalted purpose for human

effort--nor any human occupation, the results of which, if the

laborers in this sacred vineyard be successful, can compare with this

either in degree or extent--since human happiness, both temporal and

eternal, is its end, and must be its final consummation. Riches often

perish, and are followed by poverty, wretchedness, and extreme

suffering. Honors frequently fade away, or are snatched from us, to be

succeeded by persecution, calumny, hatred, and disgrace. Sensual

gratifications may never come at all, or _if they do_, bitter

recollections, bodily diseases--nay, incurable remorse for their

indulgence, rarely fail to come soon after; and all this too in

defiance, as it were, of what the world generally calls "good

Education." But pure Religion and true Christian morality impart a

peace to the soul which nothing in nature can destroy, nor even long

disturb; while the unutterable joys and delights of a well spent life

are the sure fruits, the certain rewards of every system of

instruction well followed out, which, without any exclusion either of

science, literature, foreign languages, or tasteful accomplishments,

makes the gospel of our blessed Saviour its beginning, its middle, and

its end.

Milton is indebted for some of the finest passages in the Paradise

Lost to Marino's "Sospetti D'Herode."

For the Southern Literary Messenger.

LOSS OF BREATH.

A TALE A LA BLACKWOOD. BY EDGAR A. POE.

O breathe not, &c.--_Moore's Melodies_.

The most notorious ill-fortune must, in the end, yield to the untiring

courage of philosophy--as the most stubborn city to the ceaseless

vigilance of an enemy. Salmanezer, as we have it in the holy writings,

lay three years before Samaria: yet it fell. Sardanapalus--see

Diodorus--maintained himself seven in Nineveh: but to no purpose. Troy

expired at the close of the second lustrum: and Azoth, as Aristæus

declares upon his honor as a gentleman, opened at last her gates to

Psammitticus, after having barred them for the fifth part of a

century.

* * * * *

"Thou wretch!--thou vixen!--thou shrew!"--said I to my wife on the

morning after our wedding--"thou witch!--thou hag!--thou

whippersnapper!--thou sink of iniquity!--thou fiery-faced quintessence

of all that is abominable!--thou--thou--" Here standing upon tiptoe,

seizing her by the throat, and placing my mouth close to her ear, I

was preparing to launch forth a new and more decided epithet of

opprobrium which should not fail, if ejaculated, to convince her of

her insignificance, when, to my extreme horror and astonishment, I

discovered that _I had lost my breath_.

The phrases "I am out of breath," "I have lost my breath," &c. are

often enough repeated in common conversation, but it had never

occurred to me that the terrible accident of which I speak could _boná

fide_ and actually happen! Imagine--that is if you have a fanciful

turn--imagine I say, my wonder--my consternation--my despair!

There is a good genius, however, which has never, at any time,

entirely deserted me. In my most ungovernable moods I still retain a

sense of propriety, _et le chemin des passions me conduit_--as

Rousseau says it did him--_à la philosophie veritable_.

Although I could not at first precisely ascertain to what degree the

occurrence had affected me, I unhesitatingly determined to conceal at

all events the matter from my wife until farther experience should

discover to me the extent of this my unheard of calamity. Altering my

countenance, therefore, in a moment, from its bepuffed and distorted

appearance, to an expression of arch and coquettish benignity, I gave

my lady a pat on the one cheek, and a kiss on the other, and without

saying one syllable, (Furies! I could not,) left her astonished at my

drollery, as I pirouetted out of the room in a _Pas de Zephyr_.

Behold me then safely ensconced in my private _boudoir_, a fearful

instance of the ill consequences attending upon irascibility--alive

with the qualifications of the dead--dead with the propensities of the

living--an anomaly on the face of the earth--being very calm, yet

breathless.

Yes! breathless. I am serious in asserting that my breath was entirely

gone. I could not have stirred with it a feather if my life had been

at issue, or sullied even the delicacy of a mirror. Hard fate!--yet

there was some alleviation to the first overwhelming paroxysm of my

sorrow. I found upon trial that the powers of utterance which, upon my

inability to proceed in the conversation with my wife, I then

concluded to be totally destroyed, were in fact only partially

impeded, and I discovered that had I, at that interesting crisis,

dropped my voice to a singularly deep guttural, I might still have

continued to her the communication of my sentiments; this pitch of

voice (the guttural) depending, I find, not upon the current of the

breath, but upon a certain spasmodic action of the muscles of the

throat.

Throwing myself upon a chair, I remained for some time absorbed in

meditation. My reflections, be sure, were of no consolatory kind. A

thousand vague and lachrymatory fancies took possession of my

soul--and even the phantom Suicide flitted across my brain; but it is

a trait in the perversity of human nature to reject the obvious and

the ready, for the far-distant and equivocal. Thus I shudderd at

self-murder as the most decided of atrocities, while the tabby cat

purred strenuously upon the rug, and the very water-dog wheezed

assiduously under the table, each taking to itself much merit for the

strength of its lungs, and all obviously done in derision of my own

pulmonary incapacity.

Oppressed with a tumult of vague hopes and fears, I at length heard

the footstep of my wife descending the staircase. Being now assured of

her absence, I returned with a palpitating heart to the scene of my

disaster.

Carefully locking the door on the inside, I commenced a vigorous

search. It was possible, I thought, that concealed in some obscure

corner, or lurking in some closet or drawer, might be found the lost

object of my inquiry. It might have a vapory--it might even have a

tangible form. Most philosophers, upon many points of philosophy, are

still very unphilosophical. William Godwin, however, says in his

"Mandeville," that "invisible things are the only realities." This,

all will allow, is a case in point. I would have the judicious reader

pause before accusing such asseverations of an undue quantum of

absurdity. Anaxagoras--it will be remembered--maintained that snow is

black. This I have since found to be the case.

Long and earnestly did I continue the investigation: but the

contemptible reward of my industry and perseverance proved to be only

a set of false teeth, two pair of hips, an eye, and a bundle of

_billets-doux_ from Mr. Windenough to my wife. I might as well here

observe that this confirmation of my lady's partiality for Mr. W.

occasioned me little uneasiness. That Mrs. Lacko'breath should admire

any thing so dissimilar to myself was a natural and necessary evil. I

am, it is well known, of a robust and corpulent appearance, and, at

the same time somewhat diminutive in stature. What wonder then that

the lath-like tenuity of my acquaintance, and his altitude which has

grown into a proverb, should have met with all due estimation in the

eyes of Mrs. Lacko'breath? It is by logic similar to this that true

philosophy is enabled to set misfortune at defiance. But to return.

My exertions, as I have before said, proved fruitless. Closet after

closet--drawer after drawer--corner after corner--were scrutinized to

no purpose. At one time, however, I thought myself sure of my prize,

having, in rummaging a dressing-case, accidentally demolished a bottle

(I had a remarkably sweet breath) of Hewitt's "Seraphic and

Highly-Scented Extract of Heaven or Oil of Archangels"--which, as an

agreeable perfume, I here take the liberty of recommending.

With a heavy heart I returned to my _boudoir_--there to ponder upon

some method of eluding my wife's penetration, until I could make

arrangements prior to my leaving the country, for to this I had

already made up my mind. In a foreign climate, being unknown, I might,

with some probability of success, endeavor to conceal my unhappy

calamity--a calamity calculated, even more than beggary, to estrange

the affections of the multitude, and to draw down upon the wretch the

well-merited indignation of the virtuous and the happy. I was not long

in hesitation. Being naturally quick, I committed to memory the entire

tragedies of ----, and ----. I had the good fortune to recollect that

in the accentuation of these dramas, or at least of such portion of

them as is allotted to their heroes, the tones of voice in which I

found myself deficient were altogether unnecessary, and that the deep

guttural was expected to reign monotonously throughout.

The southern literary messenger, Vol. I., No. 13, September, 1835 · 第 4 / 16 段