CHAPTER IV.

THE WITCHES OF SCOTLAND.

Among the people of Scotland, a more serious-minded and imaginative

race than the English, the superstition of witchcraft was deeply

rooted at an early period. Its development was encouraged not only by

the idiosyncrasies of the national character, but also by the nature

of the country and the climate in which they lived. The lofty

mountains, with their misty summits and shadowy ravines--their deep

obscure glens--were the fitting homes of the wildest fancies, the

eëriest legends; and the storm crashing through the forests, and the

surf beating on the rocky shore, suggested to the ear of the peasant

or the fisherman the voices of unseen creatures--of the dread spirits

of the waters and the air. To men who believed in kelpie and wraith

and the second sight, a belief in witch and warlock was easy enough.

And it was not until the Calvinist reformers imported into Scotland

their austere and rigid creed, with its literal interpretation of

Biblical imagery, that witchcraft came to be regarded as a crime. It

was not until 1563 that the Parliament of Scotland passed a statute

constituting 'witchcraft and dealing with witches' a capital offence.

It is true that persons accused of witchcraft had already suffered

death--as the Earl of Mar, brother of James III., who was suspected of

intriguing with witches and sorcerers in order to compass his

brother's death, and Lady Glamis, in 1532, charged with a similar plot

against James V.--but in both these cases it was the _treason_ which

was punished rather than the _sorcery_.

In the Scottish criminal records the first person who suffered death

for the practice of witchcraft was a Janet Bowman, in 1572. No

particulars of her offence are given; and against her name are written

only the significant words, 'convict and byrnt.'

A remarkable case, that of Bessie Dunlop, belongs to 1576.[44] She was

the wife of an Ayrshire peasant, Andrew Jack. According to her own

statement, she was going one day from her house to the yard of

Monkcastle, driving her cows to the pasture, and greeting over her

troubles--for she had a milch-cow nigh sick to death, and her husband

and child were lying ill, and she herself had but recently risen from

childbed--when a strange man met her, and saluted her with the words,

'Gude day, Bessie!' She answered civilly, and, in reply to his

questions, acquainted him with her anxieties; whereupon he informed

her that her cow, her two sheep, and her child would die, but that her

gude man would recover. She described this stranger in graphic

language as 'an honest, wele-elderlie man, gray bairdit, and had ane

gray coat with Lumbart slevis of the auld fassoun; ane pair of gray

brekis and quhyte schankis, gartaurt above the knee; ane black bonnet

on his heid, cloise behind and plane before, with silkin laissis

drawin throw the lippis thairof; and ane quhyte wand in his hand.' He

told Bessie that his name was _Thomas Reid_, and that he had been

killed at the Battle of Pinkie. Extraordinary as was this information,

it did not seem improbable to her when she noted the manner of his

disappearance through the yard of Monkcastle: 'I thocht he gait in at

ane narroware hoill of the dyke [wall], nor ony erdlie man culd haif

gaun throw; and swa I was sumthing fleit [terrified].'

Thomas Reid's sinister predictions were duly fulfilled. Soon

afterwards, he again met Bessie, and boldly invited her to deny her

religion, and the faith in which she was christened, in return for

certain worldly advantages. But Bessie steadfastly refused.

This visitor of hers was under no fear of the ordinance which is

supposed to limit the mundane excursions of 'spiritual creatures' to

the hours between sunset and cockcrow; for he generally made his

appearance at mid-day. It is not less singular that he made no

objection to the presence of humanity. On one occasion he called at

her house, where she sat conversing with her husband _and three

tailors_, and, invisible to them, plucked her by the apron, and led

her to the door, and thence up the hill-end, where he bade her stand,

and be silent, whatever she might hear or see. And suddenly she beheld

twelve persons, eight women and four men; the men clad in gentlemen's

clothing, and the women with plaids round about them, very seemly to

look at. Thomas was among them. They bade her sit down, and said:

'Welcome, Bessie; wilt thou go with us?' But she made no answer, and

after some conversation among themselves, they disappeared in a

hideous whirlwind.

When Thomas returned, he informed her that the persons she had seen

were the 'good wights,' who dwell in the Court of Faëry, and he

brought her an invitation to accompany them thither--an invitation

which he repeated with much earnestness. She answered, with true

Scotch caution: 'She saw no profit to gang that kind of gates, unless

she knew wherefore.'

'Seest thou not me,' he rejoined, 'worth meat and worth clothes, and

good enough like in person?'

The prospect, however, could not beguile her; and she continued firm

in her simple resolve to dwell with her husband and bairns, whom she

had no wish to abandon. Off went Thomas in a storm of anger; but

before long he recovered his temper, and resumed his visits, showing

himself willing to 'fetch and carry' at her request, and always

treating her with the deference due to a wife and mother. The only

benefit she derived from this friendship was, she said, the means of

curing diseases and recovering stolen property, so that her witchcraft

was of the simplest, innocentest kind. There was no compact with the

devil, and it injured nobody--except doctors and thieves. Yet for

yielding to this hallucination--the product of a vivid imagination,

stimulated, we suspect, by much solitary reverie--Bessie Dunlop was

'convyct and byrnt.' Mayhap, as she was led to the death-fire, she may

have dreamed that she had done better to have gone with Thomas Reid to

the Court of Faëry!

* * * * *

The combination of the fairy folklore with the gloomier inventions of

witchcraft occurs again in the case of Alison Pierson (1588). There

was a certain William Simpson, a great scholar and physician, and a

native of Stirling. While but a child, he was taken away from his

parents 'by a man of Egypt, a giant,' who led him away to Egypt with

him, 'where he remained by the space of twelve years before he came

home again.' On his return, he made the acquaintance of Alison, who

was a near relative, and cured her of certain ailments; but soon

afterwards, less fortunate in treating himself, he died. Some months

had passed when, one day as Alison was lying on her bed, sick and

alone, she was suddenly addressed by a man in green clothes, who told

her that, if she would be faithful, he would do her good. In her first

alarm, she cried for help, but no one hearing, she called upon the

Divine Name, when her visitor immediately disappeared. Before long, he

came to her again, attended by many men and women; and compelling her

to accompany them, they set off in a gay procession to Lothian, where

they found puncheons of wine, with drinking-cups, and enjoyed

themselves right heartily. Thenceforward she was on the friendliest

terms with the 'good neighbours,' even visiting the Fairy Queen at her

court, where, according to her own account, she was made much of, was

treated, indeed, as 'one of themselves,' and allowed to see them

compounding wonderful healing-salves in miniature pans over tiny

fires.

It would seem that this woman had acquired a considerable knowledge of

'herbs and simples,' and that the medicines she made up effected

remarkable cures. No doubt it was for the purpose of enhancing the

value of her concoctions that she professed to have obtained the

secret of them from the fairies. So great was her repute for medicinal

skill, that the Archbishop of St. Andrews sought her advice in a

dangerous illness, and, by her directions, ate 'a sodden food,' and at

two draughts absorbed a quart of good claret wine, which she had

previously medicated, greatly benefiting thereby.

Alison had a fertile fancy and a fluent tongue, and told stories of

the fairies and their doings which did credit to her invention. It

does not appear that she injured anybody, except, perhaps, by her

drugs, but, then, even the faculty sometimes do _that_! But, like

Bessie Dunlop, she was convicted of witchcraft, and burned. The

surprising thing about this and similar cases is, that the poor woman

should have assisted in her own condemnation by devising such

extraordinary fictions. What was the use of them? A prisoner on a

charge which, if proved against her, meant a terrible death, what

object did she expect to gain? Was it all done for the sake of the

temporary surprise and astonishment her tale created? that she might

be the heroine of an hour?--Men have, we know, their strange

ambitions, but if this were Alison Pierson's, it was one of the very

strangest.

* * * * *

In the next case I shall bring forward, that of Dame Fowlis, we come

upon the trail of actual crime. Dame Fowlis, second wife of the chief

of the clan Munro, was by birth a Roise or Ross, of Balnagown. To

effect the aggrandisement of her own family, she plotted the death of

Robert, her husband's eldest son, in order to marry his wealthy widow

to her brother, George Roise or Ross, laird of Balnagown; but as he,

too, was married, it was necessary to get rid of _his_ wife also. For

this 'double event,' she employed, with little attempt at concealment,

three 'notorious witches'--Agnes Roy, Christian Roy, and Marjory Nayre

MacAllister, alias Loskie Loncart--besides one William MacGillivordam,

and several other persons of dubious reputation. About Midsummer,

1576, Agnes Roy was despatched to bring Loskie Loncart into Dame

Fowlis' presence. The result of this interview was soon apparent. Clay

images of the two doomed individuals were made, and exposed to the

usual sorceries; while MacGillivordam obtained a supply of poison from

Aberdeen, which the cook was bribed to put into a dish intended for

the lady of Balnagown's table. It did not prove mortal, as

anticipated, but afflicted the unfortunate lady with a long and severe

illness. Dame Fowlis, however, felt no remorse, but continued her

plots, gradually widening their scope until she resolved to kill all

her husband's children by his first wife, in order to secure the

inheritance for her own. In May, 1577, she instructed MacGillivordam

to procure a large quantity of poison. He refused, unless his brother

was made privy to the transaction. I suppose this was done, as the

poison was obtained, and proved to be so deadly in its nature that two

persons--a woman and a boy--were killed by accidentally tasting of it.

Foiled in her scheme, Dame Fowlis resorted to the practices of

witchcraft, and bought, in June, for five shillings, 'an elf

arrow-head'--that is, a rude flint implement--belonging to the

neolithic age. On July 2, she and her accomplices met together in

secret conclave; and having made an image of butter to resemble Robert

Munro, they placed it against the wall; and then, with the elf

arrow-head, Loskie Loncart shot at it for eight times, but each time

without success, a proof that the familiars of the devil, like their

master, could not always hit the mark. Meeting a second time for the

same purpose, they made an image of clay, at which Loskie shot twelve

times in succession, invariably missing, to the great disappointment

of all concerned. The failure was ascribed to the elf arrow-head, and

in August another was procured; two figures of clay were also made,

for Robert Munro and for Lady Balnagown, respectively; at the latter

Dame Fowlis shot twice, and at the former Loskie Loncart shot thrice;

but the shooting was no better than before, and the two images being

accidentally broken, the charm was destroyed. It was proposed to try

poison again, but by this time the authorities had gained information

of what was going on, and towards the end of November, Christian Roy,

who had been present at the third meeting, was arrested. Being put to

the torture, she confessed everything, and, together with some of her

confederates, was convicted of witchcraft and burnt. Dame Fowlis, who

assuredly was not the least guilty person, escaped to Caithness, but,

after remaining in concealment for nine months, was allowed to return

to her home. In 1588, her husband died, and was succeeded in his

estates by Robert Munro, who revived the charge of witchcraft against

his step-mother, and obtained a commission for her examination and

that of her surviving accomplices. Dame Fowlis was put on her trial on

July 22, 1590; but she had money and friends, and contrived to obtain

a verdict of acquittal.

It is one of the most remarkable features of this remarkable case

that, as soon as her acquittal was pronounced, a new trial was opened,

in which the defendant was her other stepson, Hector Munro,[45] who

had been, only an hour before, the principal witness against her. The

allegations against him were: first, that, during the sore sickness of

his brother, in the summer of 1588, he had consulted with 'three

notorious and common witches' respecting the best means of curing him,

and had sheltered them for several days, until compelled by his father

to send them about their business; and, second, that falling ill

himself, in January, 1559, he had caused a certain Marion MacIngaruch,

'one of the most notorious and rank witches in the whole realm,' to be

brought to him, and who, after administering three draughts of water

out of three stones which she carried with her, declared that his sole

chance of recovery lay in the sacrifice of 'the principal man of his

blood.' After due consultation, they decided that this vicarious

sufferer must be George Munro, his step-brother, the eldest son of

Dame Fowlis. Messengers were accordingly sent in search of him.

Apprehending no evil, he obeyed the call, and five days afterwards

arrived at the house of Hector Munro. Following the directions of the

witch, Hector received his brother in silence, giving him his left

hand, and taking him by the right hand, and uttering no word of

greeting until he had spoken. George, astounded by the chillness of

his reception, which he could not but contrast with the warmth of the

invitations, remained in his brother's sick-room an hour without

speaking. At last he asked Hector how he felt. 'The better that you

have come to visit me,' replied Hector, and then was again silent, for

so the witch had ordained. An hour after midnight appeared Marion

MacIngaruch, with several assistants; and, arming themselves with

spades, they repaired to a nook of ground at the sea-side, situated

between the boundaries of the estates of the two lairds, and there,

removing the turf, they dug a grave of the size of the invalid.

Marion returned to the house, and gave directions to her confederates

as to the parts they were to play in the startling scene which was yet

to be enacted. It was represented to her that if George died suddenly

suspicions would be aroused, with a result dangerous to all concerned;

and she thereupon undertook that he should be spared until April 17

next thereafter. Hector was then wrapped up in a couple of blankets,

and carried to the grave in silence. In silence he was deposited in

it, and the turf lightly laid upon him, while Marion stationed herself

by his side. His foster-mother, one Christiana Neill Dayzell, then

took a young lad by the hand, and ran the breadth of nine ridges,

afterwards inquiring of the witch 'who might be her choice,' and

receiving for answer, 'That Hector was her choice to live, and his

brother George to die for him.' This ceremony was thrice repeated, and

the sick man was then taken from the grave, and carried home, the most

absolute silence still being maintained.

Such an experience on a bitter January night might well have proved

fatal to the subject of it; but, strange to say, Hector Munro

recovered--probably from the effect on his imagination of rites so

peculiar and impressive; whereas, in the month of April, George Munro

was seized with a grievous illness, of which, in the following June,

he died. Grateful for the cure she had effected, Hector received the

witch Marion into high favour, installing her at his uncle's house of

Kildrummadyis, entertaining her 'as if she had been his spouse, and

giving her such pre-eminence in the county that none durst offend

her.' But it is the nature of such unhallowed confederacies to

surrender, sooner or later, their dark, dread secrets. Whispers spread

abroad, gradually shaping themselves into a connected story which

invited judicial investigation. A warrant was issued for the arrest of

Marion MacIngaruch; but for some time Hector Munro contrived to

conceal her, until Dame Fowlis discovered and made known that she was

lying in the house at Fowlis. She was arrested; and, making a full

confession of her actions, was sentenced to death, and burnt. Hector

Munro, however, was more fortunate, and obtained his acquittal.

FOOTNOTES:

[44] Pitcairn, 'Criminal Trials,' i. 49-58. This chapter is mainly

founded on the reports in Pitcairn.

[45] Pitcairn, _ut ante_, i. 192, 202, 285.

JAMES I. AND THE WITCHES.

These, and other cases of witchcraft which, as the mania extended,

occurred in various parts of the country, attracted the attention of

King James, and made a profound impression upon him. Taking up the

study of the subject with enthusiasm, he inquired into the demonology

of France and Germany, where it had been matured into a science; and

this so thoroughly that he became, as already stated, an expert, and

was really entitled to pronounce authoritative decisions. His example,

however, had a disastrous effect, confirming and deepening the popular

credulity to such an extent that the common people, for a time, might

have been divided into two great classes--witches and witch-finders.

That in such circumstances many acts of cruelty should be perpetrated

was inevitable. So complete was the demoralization, that the most

trivial physical or mental peculiarity was held to be an indubitable

witch-mark, and young and old were hurried to the stake like sheep to

the slaughter.

In August, 1589, King James was married, by proxy, to Princess Anne of

Denmark; and the impatient monarch was eagerly awaiting the arrival of

his bride from Copenhagen, when the unwelcome intelligence reached him

that the vessels conveying her and her suite had been overtaken by a

storm, and, after a narrow escape from destruction, had put into the

port of Upsal, in Norway, with the intention of remaining there until

the following spring. The eager bridegroom, summoning up all his

courage--he had no love for the sea--resolved to go in search of his

queen, and, having found her, to conduct her to her new home. At Upsal

the marriage was duly solemnized; and husband and wife then voyaged to

Copenhagen, where they spent the winter. The homeward voyage was not

undertaken until the following spring; and it was on May Day, 1590,

that James and his Queen landed at Leith, after an experience of the

sea which confirmed James's distaste for it.

The political disorder of the country, and the hold which the new

superstition had obtained upon the minds of the people, encouraged the

circulation of dark mysterious rumours in connection with the King's

unfavourable passage; and a general belief soon came to be established

that the tempestuous weather which had so seriously affected it was

due to the intervention of supernatural powers, at the instigation of

human treachery. Suspicion fixed at length upon the Earl of Bothwell,

who was arrested and committed to prison; but in June, 1591, contrived

to make his escape, and conceal himself in the remote recesses of the

Highlands. Not long afterwards, some curious circumstances attending

certain cures which a servant girl--Geillis, or Gillies, Duncan--had

performed, led to her being suspected of witchcraft; and this

suspicion opened up a series of investigations, which revealed the

existence of an extraordinary conspiracy against the King's life.

Geillis Duncan was in the employment of David Seton, deputy-bailiff of

the small town of Tranent, in Haddingtonshire. Unlike the witch of

English rural life, she was young, comely, and fair-complexioned; and

the only ground on which the idea of witchcraft was associated with

her was the wonderful quickness with which she had cured some sick and

diseased persons, the fact being that she was well acquainted with the

healing properties of herbs. When her master severely interrogated

her, she at once denied all knowledge of the mysteries of the black

art. He then, without leave or license, put her to the torture; she

still continued to protest her innocence. It was a popular conviction

that no witch would confess so long as the devil-mark on her body

remained undiscovered. She was subjected to an indecent

examination--the stigma was found (said the examiners) on her throat;

she was again subjected to the torture. The outraged girl's fortitude

then gave way; she acknowledged whatever her persecutors wished to

learn. Yes, she _was_ a _witch_! She had made a compact with the

devil; all her cures had been effected by his assistance--quite a new

feature in the character of Satan, who has not generally been

suspected of any compassionate feeling towards suffering humanity.

That she had done good instead of harm availed the unfortunate Geillis

nothing. She was committed to prison; and the torture being a third

time applied, made a fuller confession, in which she named her

accomplices or confederates, some forty in number, residing in

different parts of Lothian. Their arrest and examination disclosed the

particulars of one of the strangest intrigues ever concocted.

The principal parties in it were Dr. Fian, or Frain, a reputed wizard,

also known as John Cunningham; a grave matron, named Agnes Sampson;

Euphemia Macalzean, daughter of Lord Cliftonhall; and Barbara Napier.

Fian, or Cunningham, was a schoolmaster of Tranent, and a man of

ability and education; but his life had been evil--he was a vendor of

poisons--and, though innocent of the preposterous crimes alleged

against him, had dabbled in the practices of the so-called sorcery.

When a twisted cord was bound round his bursting temples, he would

confess nothing; and, exasperated by his fortitude, the authorities

subjected him to the terrible torture of 'the boots.' Even this he

endured in silence, until exhausted nature came to his relief with an

interval of unconsciousness. He was then released; restoratives were

applied; and, while he hovered on the border of sensibility, he was

induced to sign 'a full confession.' Being remanded to his prison, he

contrived, two days afterwards, to escape; but was recaptured, and

brought before the High Court of Justiciary, King James himself being

present. Fian strenuously repudiated the so-called confession which

had been foisted upon him in his swoon, declaring that his signature

had been obtained by a fraud. Whereupon King James, enraged at what he

conceived to be the man's stubborn wilfulness, ordered him again to

the torture. His fingernails were torn out with pincers, and long

needles thrust into the quick; but the courageous man made no sign. He

was then subjected once more to the barbarous 'boots,' in which he

continued so long, and endured so many blows, that 'his legs were

crushed and beaten together as small as might be, and the bones and

flesh so bruised, that the blood and marrow spouted forth in great

abundance, whereby they were made unserviceable for ever.'

As ultimately extorted from the unfortunate Fian, his confession shows

a remarkable mixture of imposture and self-deception--a patchwork of

the falsehoods he believed and those he invented. Singularly grotesque

is his account of his introduction to the devil: He was lodging at

Tranent, in the house of one Thomas Trumbill, who had offended him by

neglecting to 'sparge' or whitewash his chamber, as he had promised;

and, while lying in his bed, meditating how he might be revenged of

the said Thomas, the devil, _clothed in white raiment_, suddenly

appeared, and said: 'Will ye be my servant, and adore me and all my

servants, and ye shall never want?' Never want! The bribe to a poor

Scotch dominie was immense; Fian could not withstand it, and at once

enlisted among 'the Devil's Own.' As his first act of service, he had

the pleasure of burning down Master Trumbill's house. The next night

Beelzebub paid him another visit, and put his mark upon him with a

rod. Thereafter he was found lying in his chamber in a trance, during

which, he said, he was carried in the spirit over many mountains, and

accomplished an aërial circumnavigation of the globe. In the future he

attended all the nightly conferences of witches and fiends held

throughout Lothian, displaying so much energy and capacity that the

devil appointed him to be his 'registrar and secretary.'

The first convention at which he was present assembled in the parish

church of North Berwick, a breezy, picturesque seaport at the mouth of

the Forth, about sixteen miles from Preston Pans. Satan occupied the

pulpit, and delivered 'a sermon of doubtful speeches,' designed for

their encouragement. His servants, he said, should never want, and

should ail nothing, so long as their hairs were on, and they let no

tears fall from their eyes. He bade them spare not to do evil, and

advised them to eat, drink, and be merry: after which edifying

discourse they did homage to him in the usual indecent manner. Fian,

as I have said, was an evil-living man, and needed no exhortation from

the devil to do wicked things. In the course of his testimony he

invented, as was so frequently the strange practice of persons accused

of witchcraft, the most extravagant fictions--as, for instance: One

night he supped at the miller's, a few miles from Tranent; and as it

was late when the revel ended, one of the miller's men carried him

home on horseback. To light them on their way through the dark of

night, Fian raised up four candles on the horse's ears, and one on the

staff which his guide carried; their great brightness made the

midnight appear as noonday; but the miller's man was so terrified by

the phenomenon that, on his return home, he fell dead.

Let us next turn to the confession of Agnes Sampson, 'the wise wife of

Keith,' as she was popularly called. She was charged with having done

grave injury to persons who had incurred her displeasure; but she

seems, when all fictitious details are thrust aside, to have been

simply a shrewd and sagacious old Scotchwoman, with much force of

character, who made a decent living as a herb-doctor. Archbishop

Spottiswoode describes her as matronly in appearance, and grave of

demeanour, and adds that she was composed in her answers. Yet were

those answers the wildest and most extraordinary utterances

imaginable, and, if they be truly recorded, they convict her of

unscrupulous audacity and unfailing ingenuity.

She affirmed that her service to the devil began after her husband's

death, when he appeared to her in mortal likeness, and commanded her

to renounce Christ, and obey him as her master. For the sake of the

riches he promised to herself and her children, she consented; and

thereafter he came in the guise of a dog, of which she asked

questions, always receiving appropriate replies. On one occasion,

having been summoned by the Lady Edmaston, who was lying sick, she

went out into the garden at night, and called the devil by his

terrestrial or mundane _alias_ of Elva. He bounded over the stone wall

in the likeness of a dog, and approached her so close that she was

frightened, and charged him by 'the law he believed in' to keep his

distance. She then asked him if the lady would recover; he replied in

the negative. In his turn he inquired where the gentlewomen, her

daughters, were; and being informed that they were to meet her in the

garden, said that one of them should be his leman. 'Not so,' exclaimed

the wise wife undauntedly; and the devil then went away howling, like

a whipped schoolboy, and _hid himself in the well_ until after supper.

The young gentlewomen coming into the bloom and perfumes of the

garden, he suddenly emerged, seized the Lady Torsenye, and attempted

to drag her into the well; but Agnes gripped him firmly, and by her

superior strength delivered her from his clutches. Then, with a

terrible yell, he disappeared.

Yet another story: Agnes, with Geillis Duncan and other witches,

desiring to be revenged on the deputy bailiff, met on the bridge at

Fowlistruther, and dropped a cord into the river, Agnes Sampson

crying, 'Hail! Holloa!' Immediately they felt the end of the cord

dragged down by a great weight; and on drawing it up, up came the

devil along with it! He inquired if they had all been good servants,

and gave them a charm to blight Seton and his property; but _it was

accidentally diverted in its operation, and fell upon another

person_--a touch of realism worthy of Defoe!

Euphemia Macalzean, a lady of high social position, daughter and

heiress of Lord Cliftonhall (who was eminent as lawyer, statesman, and

scholar), seems to have been involved in this welter of intrigue,

conspiracy, and deception, through her adherence to Bothwell's

faction, and her devotion to the Roman communion. Her confession was

as grotesque and unveracious as that of any of her associates. She was

made a witch (she said) through the agency of an Irishwoman 'with a

fallen nose,' and, to perfect herself in the craft, had paid another

witch, who resided in St. Ninian's Row, Edinburgh, for 'inaugurating'

her with 'the girth of ane gret bikar,' revolving it 'oft round her

head and neck, and ofttimes round her head.' She was accused of having

administered poison to her husband, her father-in-law, and some other

persons; and whatever may be thought of the allegations of sorcery and

witchcraft, this heavier charge seems to have been well-founded.

Euphemia said that her acquaintance with Agnes Sampson began with her

first accouchement, when she applied to her to mitigate her pains, and

she did so by transferring them to a dog. At her second accouchement,

Agnes transferred them to a cat.

As a determined enemy of the Protestant religion, Satan was inimical

to King James's marriage with a Protestant princess, and to break up

an alliance which would greatly limit his power for evil, he

determined to sink the ship that carried the newly-married couple on

their homeward voyage. His first device was to hang over the sea a

very dense mist, in the hope that the royal ship would miss her

course, and strike on some dangerous rock. When this device failed,

Dr. Fian was ordered to summon all the witches to meet their master at

the haunted kirk of North Berwick. Accordingly, on All-Hallow-mass

Eve, they assembled there to the number of two hundred; and each one

embarking in 'a riddle,' or sieve,[46] they sailed over the ocean

'very substantially,' carrying with them flagons of wine, and making

merry, and drinking 'by the way.' After sailing about for some time,

they met with their master, bearing in his claws a cat, which had

previously been drawn nine times through the fire. Handing it to one

of the warlocks, he bade him cast it into the sea, and shout 'Hola!'

whereupon the ocean became convulsed, and the waters seethed, and the

billows rose like heaving mountains. On through the storm sailed this

eerie company until they reached the Scottish coast, where they

landed, and, joining hands, danced in procession to the kirk of North

Berwick, Geillis Duncan going before them, playing a reel upon her

Jew's-harp, or trump--formerly a favourite musical instrument with

the Scotch peasantry--and singing:

'Cummer, go ye before; cummer, go ye;

Gif ye will not go before, cummer, let me!'

Having arrived at their rendezvous, they danced round it

'withershins'--that is, in reverse of the apparent motion of the sun.

Dr. Fian then blew into the keyhole of the door, which opened

immediately, and all the witches and warlocks entered in. It was

pitch-dark; but Fian lighted the tapers by merely blowing on them, and

their sudden blaze revealed the devil in the pulpit, attired in a

black gown and hat. The description given of the fiend reveals the

stern imagination of the North, and is characteristic of the 'weird

sisters' of Scotland, who form, as Dr. Burton remarks, so grand a

contrast to 'the vulgar grovelling parochial witches of England.' His

body was hard as iron; his face terrible, with a nose like an eagle's

beak; his eyes glared like fire; his voice was gruff as the sound of

the east wind; his hands and legs were covered with hair, and his

hands and feet were armed with long claws. On beholding him, witches

and warlocks, with one accord, cried: 'All hail, master!' He then

called over their names, and demanded of them severally whether they

had been good and faithful servants, and what measure of success had

attended their operations against the lives of King James and his

bride--which surely he ought to have known! Gray Malkin, a foolish old

warlock, who officiated as beadle or janitor, heedlessly answered,

That nothing ailed the King yet, God be thanked! At which the devil,

in a fury, leaped from the pulpit, and lustily smote him on the ears.

He then resumed his position, and delivered his sermon, commanding

them to act faithfully in their service, and do all the evil they

could. Euphemia Macalzean and Agnes Sampson summoned up courage enough

to ask him whether he had brought an image or picture of the King,

that, by pricking it with pins, they might inflict upon its living

pattern all kinds of pain and disease. The devil was fain to

acknowledge that he had forgotten it, and was soundly rated by

Euphemia for his carelessness, Agnes Sampson and several other women

seizing the opportunity to load him with reproaches on their

respective accounts.

On another occasion, according to Agnes Sampson, she, Dr. Fian, and a

wizard of some energy, named Robert Grierson, with several others,

left Grierson's house at Preston Pans in a boat, and went out to sea

to 'a tryst.' Embarking on board a ship, they drank copiously of good

wine and ale, after which they sank the ship and her crew, and

returned home. And again, sailing from North Berwick in a boat like a

chimney, they saw the devil--in shape and size resembling a huge

hayrick--rolling over the great waves in front of them. They went on

board a vessel called _The Grace of God_, where they enjoyed, as

before, an abundance of wine and 'other good cheer.' On leaving it,

the devil, who was underneath the ship, raised an evil wind, and it

perished.

Some of these stories proved to be too highly coloured even for the

credulity of King James; and he rightly enough exclaimed that the

witches were, like their master, 'extraordinary liars.' It is said,

however, that he changed his opinion after Agnes Sampson, in a private

conference which he accorded to her, related the details of a

conversation between himself and the Queen that had taken place under

such circumstances as to ensure inviolable secrecy. It is curious that

a very similar story is told of Jeanne Darc--whom our ancestors burned

as a witch--and King Charles VI. of France.

Despite the machinations of the devil and the witches, King James and

Queen Anne, as we know, escaped every peril, and reached Leith in

safety. The devil sourly remarked that James was 'a man of God,' and

was evidently inclined to let him alone severely; but the Preston Pans

conspirators, instigated, perhaps, by some powerful personages who

kept prudently in the background, resolved on another attempt against

their sovereign's life. On Lammas Eve (July 31, 1590), nine of the

ringleaders, including Dr. Fian, Agnes Sampson, Euphemia Macalzean,

and Barbara Napier, with some thirty confederates, assembled at the

New Haven, between Musselburgh and Preston Pans, at a spot called the

Fairy Holes, where they were met by the devil in the shape of a black

man, which was 'thought most meet to do the turn for the which they

were convened.' Agnes Sampson at once proposed that they should make a

final effort for the King's destruction. The devil took an

unfavourable view of the prospects of their schemes; but he promised

them a waxen image, and directed them to hang up and roast a toad, and

to lay its drippings--mixed with strong wash, an adder's skin, and

'the thing on the forehead of a new-foaled foal'--in James's path, or

to suspend it in such a position that it might drip upon his body.

This precious injunction was duly obeyed, and the toad hung up where

the dripping would fall upon the King, 'during his Majesty's being at

the Brig of Dee, the day before the common bell rang, for fear the

Earl Bothwell should have entered Edinburgh.' But the devil's

foreboding was fulfilled, and the conspirators missed their aim, the

King happening to take a different route to that by which he had been

expected.

It is useless to repeat more of these wild and desperate stories, or

to inquire too closely into their origin. Fact and fiction are so

mixed up in them, and the embellishments are so many and so bold, that

it is difficult to get at the nucleus of truth; but, setting aside the

witch or supernatural element, we seem driven to the conclusion that

these persons had combined together for some nefarious purpose.

Whether they intended to compass the King's death by the superstitious

practices which the credulity of the age supposed to be effective, or

whether these practices were intended as a cover for surer means,

cannot now be determined. Nor can we pretend to say whether all who

were implicated in the plot by the confession of Geillis Duncan were

really guilty. Dr. Fian, at all events, protested his innocence to

the last; and with regard to him and others, the evidence adduced was

painfully inadequate. But they were all convicted and sentenced to

death. In the case of Barbara Napier, the majority of the jury at

first acquitted her on the principal charges; but the King was highly

indignant, and threatened them with a trial for 'wilful error upon an

assize.' To avoid the consequences, they threw themselves upon the

King's mercy, and were benevolently 'pardoned.' Poor Barbara Napier

was hanged. So was Dr. Fian, on Castle Hill, Edinburgh (in January,

1592), and burned afterwards. So were Agnes Sampson, Agnes Thomson,

and their real or supposed confederates. The punishment of Euphemia

Macalzean was exceptionally severe. Instead of the ordinary sentence,

directing the criminal to be first strangled and then burnt, it was

ordered that she should be 'bound to a stake, and burned in ashes,

_quick_ to the death.' This fate befell her on June 25, 1591.

It was an unhappy result of this remarkable trial that it confirmed

King James in his belief that he possessed a rare faculty for the

detection of witches and the discovery of witchcraft. Continuing his

investigation of the subject with fanatical zeal, he published in

Edinburgh, in 1597, the outcome of his researches in his

'Dæmonologie'--an elaborate treatise, written in the form of a

dialogue, the spirit of which may be inferred from its author's

prefatory observations: 'The fearful abounding,' he says, 'at this

time and in this country, of these detestable slaves of the devil,

the witches or enchanters, hath moved me (beloved reader) to despatch

in post this following treatise of mine, not in any wise (as I

protest) to serve for a show of mine own learning and ingene, but only

(moved of conscience) to press thereby, so far as I can, to resolve

the doubting hearts of many, both that such assaults of Satan are most

certainly practised, and that the instrument thereof merits most

severely to be punished, against the damnable opinions of two,

principally in our age; whereof the one called Scot, an Englishman, is

not ashamed in public print to deny that there can be such thing as

witchcraft, and so maintains the old error of the Sadducees in denying

of spirits. The other, called Wierus, a German physician, sets out a

public apology for all these crafts-folks, whereby procuring for them

impunity, he plainly betrays himself to have been one of that

profession.'

Not only is King James fully convinced of the existence of witchcraft,

but he is determined to treat it as a capital crime. 'Witches,' he

affirms, 'ought to be put to death, according to the laws of God, the

civil and imperial law, and the municipal law of all Christian

nations; yea, to spare the life, and not strike whom God bids strike,

and so severely punish so odious a treason against God, is not only

unlawful, but, doubtless, as great a sin in the magistrate as was

Saul's sparing Agag.' Conscious that the evidence brought against the

unfortunate victims was generally of the weakest possible character,

he contends that because the crime is generally abominable, evidence

in proof of it may be accepted which would be refused in other

offences; as, for example, that of young children who are ignorant of

the nature of an oath, and that of persons of notoriously ill-repute.

And the sole chance of escape which he offers to the accused is that

of the ordeal. 'Two good helps,' he says, 'may be used: the one is the

finding of their marks, and the trying the insensibleness thereof; the

other is their floating on the water, for, as in a secret murther, if

the dead carcase be at any time thereafter handled by the murtherer,

it will gush out of blood, as if the blood were raging to the Heaven,

for revenge of the murtherer (God having appointed that secret

supernatural sign for trial of that secret unnatural crime), so that

it appears that God hath appointed (for a supernatural sign of the

monstrous impiety of witches), that the water shall refuse to receive

them in her bosom that have shaken off them the sacred water of

baptism, and wilfully refused the benefit thereof; no, not so much as

their eyes are able to shed tears at every light occasion when they

will; yea, although it were dissembling like the crocodiles, God not

permitting them to dissemble their obstinacy in so horrible a crime.'

* * * * *

Encouraged by the practice and teaching of their sovereign, the people

of Scotland, whom the anthropomorphism of their religious creed

naturally predisposed to believe in the personal appearances of the

devil, undertook a regular campaign against those ill-fated

individuals whom malice or ignorance, or their own mental or physical

peculiarities, or other causes, branded as his bond-slaves and

accomplices. Religious animosity, moreover, was a powerful factor in

stimulating and sustaining the mania; and the Scotch Calvinist enjoyed

a double gratification when some poor old woman was burned both as a

witch and a Roman Catholic. It has been calculated that, in the period

of thirty-nine years, between the enactment of the Statute of Queen

Mary and the accession of James to the English throne, the average

number of persons executed for witchcraft was 200 annually, making an

aggregate of nearly 8,000. For the first nine years about 30 or 40

suffered yearly; but latterly the annual death-roll mounted up to 400

and 500. James at last grew alarmed at the prevalence of witchcraft in

his kingdom, and seems to have devoted no small portion of his time to

attempts to detect and exterminate it.

In 1591 the Earl of Bothwell was imprisoned for having conspired the

King's death by sorcery, in conjunction with a warlock named Richie

Graham. Graham was burned on March 8, 1592. Bothwell was not brought

to trial until August 10, 1593, when several witches bore testimony

against him, but he obtained an acquittal.

In 1597, on November 12, four women were tried by the High Court of

Justiciary, in Edinburgh, on various charges of witchcraft. Their

names are recorded as Christina Livingstone, Janet Stewart, Bessie

Aikin, and Christina Sadler. Their trials, however, present no special

features of interest.

Passing over half a century, we come to the recrudescence of the

witch-mania, which followed on the restoration of Charles II. Mr. R.

Burns Begg has recently edited for the Society of Antiquaries of

Scotland a report of various witch trials in Forfar and

Kincardineshire, in the opening years of that monarch's reign, which

supplies some further illustrations of the characteristics of Scottish

witchcraft. Here we meet with the strange word 'Covin' or 'Coven'

(apparently connected with 'Covenant' or 'Convention') as applied to

an organization or guild of witches. In 1662 the Judge-General-Depute

for Scotland tried thirteen 'Coviners,' who had been detected by the

efforts of a committee consisting of the ministers and schoolmasters

of the district, together with the 'Laird of Tullibole.' Of these

thirteen unfortunate victims only one was a man. All were found guilty

by the jury, and sentenced to death. Eleven suffered at the stake; one

died before the day of execution, and one was respited on account of

her pregnancy. The evidence was of the usual extraordinary tenor, and

the so-called 'confessions' of the accused were not less puzzling than

in other cases. In Mr. Begg's opinion, which seems to me well founded,

there really _was_ in and around the Crook of Devon a local Covin, or

regularly organized band of so-called witches who acted under the

direction of a person whom they believed to be Satan. He suggests that

at this period there would be many wild and unscrupulous characters,

disbanded soldiers, and others, who found their profit in the

'blinded allegiance' of the witches and warlocks. The difficulty is,

what _was_ this profit? The witches do not seem to have paid anything

in money or in kind. There are allusions which point to acts of

immorality, and in several instances one can understand that personal

enmities were gratified; but on the whole the personators of Satan had

scant reward for all their trouble. And how was it that they were

never denounced by any of their victims? How was it that the vigilance

which detected the witches never tripped up their master? How are we

to explain the diversity of Satan's appearances? At one time he was

'ane bonnie lad;' at another, an 'unco-like man, in black-coloured

clothes and ane blue bonnet;' at another, a 'black iron-hard man;' and

yet again, 'ane little man in rough gray clothes.' Occasionally he

brought with him a piper, and the witches danced together, and the

ground under them was all fireflaughts, and Andrew Watson had his

usual staff in his hand, and although he is a blind man, yet danced he

as nimbly as any of the company, and made also great merriment by

singing his old ballads; and Isabel Shyrrie did sing her song called

'Tinkletum, Tankletum.' Alas, that no obliging pen has transmitted

'Tinkletum, Tankletum' to posterity! One could point to a good many

songs which the world could have better spared. 'Tinkletum,

Tankletum'--there is something amazingly suggestive in the words;

possibilities of humour, perhaps of satire; humour and satire which

might have secured for Isabel Shyrrie a place among Scottish

poetesses, whereas now she comes before us in no more attractive

character than that of a Coviner--a deluded or self-deluding witch.

Let us next betake ourselves to the East Coast, and make the

acquaintance of Isabel Gowdie, whose 'confessions' are among the most

extraordinary documents to be met with even in the records of Scottish

witchcraft. It is impossible, I think, to overrate their psychological

interest. The first is, perhaps, the most curious; and as no summary

or condensation would do justice to its details, I shall place it

before the reader _in extenso_, with no other alteration than that of

Englishing the spelling. It was made at Auldearn on April 13, 1662, in

presence of the parish minister, the sheriff-depute of Nairn, and nine

lairds and farmers of good position:

'As I was going betwixt the towns (_i.e._, farmsteadings) of

Drumdeevin and The Heads, I met with the Devil, and there covenanted

in a manner with him; and I promised to meet him, in the night-time,

in the Kirk of Auldearn,[47] which I did. And the first thing I did

there that night, I denied my baptism, and did put the one of my hands

to the crown of my head, and the other to the sole of my foot, and

then renounced all betwixt my two hands over to the Devil. He was in

the Reader's desk, and a black book in his hand. Margaret Brodie, in

Auldearn, held me up to the Devil to be baptized by him, and he marked

me in the shoulder, and sucked out my blood at that mark, and spouted

it in his hand, and, sprinkling it on my head, said, "I baptize thee,

Janet, in my own name!" And within awhile we all removed. The next

time that I met with him was in the New Wards of Inshoch.... He was a

mickle, black, rough [hirsute] man, very cold; and I found his nature

all cold within me as spring-wall-water.[48] Sometimes he had boots,

and sometimes shoes on his feet; but still his feet are forked and

cloven. He would be sometimes with us like a deer or a roe. John

Taylor and Janet Breadhead, his wife, in Belmakeith, ... Douglas, and

I myself, met in the kirkyard of Nairn, and we raised an unchristened

child out of its grave; and at the end of Bradley's cornfieldland,

just opposite to the Mill of Nairn, we took the said child, with the

nails of our fingers and toes, pickles of all sorts of grain, and

blades of kail [colewort], and hacked them all very small, mixed

together; and did put a part thereof among the muck-heaps, and thereby

took away the fruit of his corns, etc., and we parted it among two of

our Covins. When we take corns at Lammas, we take but about two

sheaves, when the corns are full; or two stalks of kail, or thereby,

and that gives us the fruit of the corn-land or kail-yard, where they

grew. And it may be, we will keep it until Yule or Pasche, and then

divide it amongst us. There are thirteen persons [the usual number] in

my Covin.

'The last time that our Covin met, we, and another Covin, were dancing

at the Hill of Earlseat; and before that, betwixt Moynes and Bowgholl;

and before that we were beyond the Mickle-burn; and the other Covin

being at the Downie-hills, we went from beyond the Mickle-burn, and

went beside them, to the houses at the Wood-End of Inshoch; and within

a while went home to our houses. Before Candlemas we went be-east

Kinloss, and there we yoked a plough of paddocks [frogs]. The Devil

held the plough, and John Young, in Mebestown, our Officer, did drive

the plough. Paddocks did draw the plough as oxen; _quickens wor

sowmes_ [dog-grass served for traces]; a riglon's [ram's] horn was a

coulter, and a piece of a riglon's horn was a sock. We went two

several times about; and all we of the Covin went still up and down

with the plough, praying to the Devil for the fruit of that land, and

that thistles and briars might grow there.

'When we go to any house, we take meat and drink; and we fill up the

barrels with our own ... again; and we put besoms in our beds with our

husbands, till we return again to them. We were in the Earl of Moray's

house in Darnaway, and we got enough there, and did eat and drink of

the best, and brought part with us. We went in at the windows. I had a

little horse, and would say, "Horse and Hattock, in the Devil's name!"

And then we would fly away, where we would, like as straws would fly

upon a highway. We will fly like straws where we please; wild straws

and corn-straws will be horses to us, and we put them betwixt our feet

and say, "Horse and Hattock, in the Devil's name!" And when any see

these straws in a whirlwind, and do not sanctify themselves, we may

shoot them dead at our pleasure. Any that are shot by us, their souls

will go to Heaven, but their bodies remain with us, and will fly as

horses to us, as small as straws.[49]

'I was in the Downie Hills, and got meat there from the Queen of

Fairy, more than I could eat. The Queen of Fairy is heavily clothed in

white linen, and in white and lemon clothes, etc.; and the King of

Fairy is a brave man, well favoured, and broad-faced, etc. There were

elf-bulls, routing and skirling up and down there, and they affrighted

me.

'When we take away any cow's milk, we pull the tail, and twine it and

plait it the wrong way, in the Devil's name; and we draw the tedder

(so made) in betwixt the cow's hinder-feet, and out betwixt the cow's

fore-feet, in the Devil's name, and thereby take with us the cow's

milk. We take sheep's milk even so [in the same manner]. The way to

take or give back the milk again, is to cut that tedder. When we take

away the strength of any person's ale, and give it to another, we

take a little quantity out of each barrel or stand of ale, and put it

in a stoop in the Devil's name, and in his name, with our own hands,

put it amongst another's ale, and give her the strength and substance

and "heall" of her neighbour's ale. And to keep the ale from us, that

we have no power over it, is to sanctify it well. We get all this

power from the Devil; and when we seek it from him, we will him to be

"our Lord."

'John Taylor, and Janet Breadhead, his wife, in Belmakeith, Bessie

Wilson in Aulderne, and Margaret Wilson, spouse to Donald Callam in

Aulderne, and I, made a picture of clay, to destroy the Laird of

Park's male children. John Taylor brought home the clay in his plaid

nook [the corner of his plaid]; his wife broke it very small, like

meal, and sifted it with a sieve, and poured in water among it, in the

Devil's name, and wrought it very sure, like rye-bout [a stir-about

made of rye-flour]; and made of it a picture of the laird's sons. It

had all the parts and marks of a child, such as head, eyes, nose,

hands, feet, mouth, and little lips. It wanted no mark of a child, and

the hands of it folded down by its sides. It was like a pow [lump of

dough], or a flayed _egrya_ [a sucking-pig, which has been scalded and

scraped]. We laid the face of it to the fire, till it strakned

[shrivelled], and a clear fire round about it, till it was red like a

coal. After that, we would roast it now and then; each other day there

would be a piece of it well roasted. The Laird of Park's whole male

children by it are to suffer, if it be not gotten and brokin, as well

as those that are born and dead already. It was still put in and taken

out of the fire in the Devil's name. It was hung up upon a crock. It

is yet in John Taylor's house, and it has a cradle of clay about it.

Only John Taylor and his wife, Janet Breadhead, Bessie and Margaret

Wilson in Aulderne, and Margaret Brodie, these, and I, were only at

the making of it. All the multitude of our number of witches, of all

the Covins, kent [_kenned_, knew] all of it, at our next meeting after

it was made. And the witches yet that are overtaken have their own

powers, and our powers which we had before we were taken, both. But

now I have no power at all.

'Margaret Kyllie, in ... is one of the other Covin; Meslie Hirdall,

spouse to Alexander Ross, in Loanhead, is one of them; her skin is

fiery. Isabel Nicol, in Lochley, is one of my Covin. Alexander Elder,

in Earlseat, and Janet Finlay, his spouse, are of my Covin. Margaret

Haslum, in Moynes, is one; Margaret Brodie, in Aulderne, Bessie and

Margaret Wilson there, and Jane Martin there, and Elspet Nishie,

spouse to John Mathew there, are of my Covin. The said Jane Martin is

the Maiden of our Covin. John Young, in Mebestown, is Officer to our

Covin.

'Elspet Chisholm, and Isabel More, in Aulderne, Maggie Brodie ... and

I, went into Alexander Cumling's litt-house [dye-house], in Aulderne.

I went in, in the likeness of a ken [jackdaw]; the said Elspet

Chisholm was in the shape of a cat. Isabel More was a hare, and Maggie

Brodie a cat, and.... We took a thread of each colour of yarn that

was on the said Alexander Cumling's litt-fatt [dyeing-vat], and did

cast three knots on each thread, in the Devil's name, and did put the

threads in the vat, _withersones_ about in the vat in the Devil's

name, and thereby took the whole strength of the vat away, that it

could litt [dye] nothing but only black, according to the colour of

the Devil, in whose name we took away the strength of the right

colours that were in the vat.'

* * * * *

The second confession, made at Aulderne, on May 3, 1662, is not less

remarkable than the foregoing:

'... After that time there would meet but sometimes a Covin [_i.e._,

thirteen], sometimes more, sometimes less; but a Grand Meeting would

be about the end of each Quarter. There is thirteen persons in each

Covin; and each of us has one Sprite to wait upon us, when we please

to call upon him. I remember not all the Sprites' names, but there is

one called _Swin_, which waits upon the said Margaret Wilson in

Aulderne; he is still [ever] clothed in grass-green; and the said

Margaret Wilson has a nickname, called "Pickle nearest the wind." The

next Sprite is called "Rosie," who waits upon Bessie Wilson, in

Aulderne; he is still clothed in yellow; and her nickname is "Through

the cornyard." ... The third Sprite is called "The Roaring Lion," who

waits upon Isabel Nicol, in Lochlors; and [he is still clothed[50]] in

sea-green; her nickname is "Bessie Rule." The fourth Sprite is called

"Mak Hector," who [waits upon Jane[50]] Martin, daughter to the said

Margaret Wilson; he is a young-like devil, clothed still in

grass-green. [Jane Martin is[50]] Maiden to the Covin that I am of;

and her nickname is "Over the dyke with it," because the Devil [always

takes the[50]] Maiden in his hand nix time we damn "Gillatrypes;" and

when he would leap from ...[50] he and she will say, "Over the dyke

with it!" The name of the fifth Sprite is "Robert the [Rule," and he

is still clothed in[50]] sad-dun, and seems to be a Commander of the

rest of the Sprites; and he waits upon Margaret Brodie, in Aulderne.

[The name of the saxt Sprite] is called "Thief of Hell wait upon

Herself;" and he waits also on the said Bessie Wilson. The name of the

seventh [Sprite is called] "The Read Reiver;" and he is my own Spirit,

that waits on myself, and is still clothed in black. The eighth Spirit

[is called] "Robert the Jackis," still clothed in dun, and seems to be

aged. He is a glaiked, glowked Spirit! The woman's [nickname] that he

waits on is "Able and Stout!" [This was Bessie Hay.] The ninth Spirit

is called "Laing," and the woman's nickname that he waits upon is

"Bessie Bold" [Elspet Nishie]. The tenth Spirit is named "Thomas a

Fiarie," etc. There will be many other Devils, waiting upon [our]

Master Devil; but he is bigger and more awful than the rest of the

Devils, and they all reverence him. I will ken them all, one by one,

from others, when they appear like a man.

'When we raise the wind, we take a rag of cloth, and wet it in water;

and we take a beetle and knock the rag on a stone, and we say thrice

over:

'"I knock this rag upon this stane,

To raise the wind, in the Devil's name;

It shall not lie until I please again!"

When we would lay the wind, we dry the rag, and say (thrice over):

'"We lay the wind in the Devil's name,

[It shall not] rise while we [or I] like to raise it again!"

And if the wind will not lie instantly [after we say this], we call

upon our Spirit, and say to him:

'"Thief! Thief! conjure the wind, and cause it to [lie?...]"

We have no power of rain, but we will raise the wind when we please.

He made us believe [...] that there was no God beside him.

'As for Elf arrow-heads, the Devil shapes them with his own hand [and

afterwards delivers them?] to Elf-boys, who "whyttis and dightis"

[shapes and trims] them with a sharp thing like a packing-needle; but

[when I was in Elf-land?] I saw them whytting and dighting them. When

I was in the Elves' houses, they will have very ... them whytting and

dighting; and the Devil gives them to us, each of us so many, when....

Those that dightis them are little ones, hollow, and boss-backed

[humped-backed]. They speak gowstie [roughly] like. When the Devil

gives them to us, he says:

'"Shoot these in my name,

And they shall not go heall hame!"

And when we shoot these arrows (we say):

'"I shoot you man in the Devil's name,

He shall not win heall hame!

And this shall be always true;

There shall not be one bit of him on lieiw" [on life, alive].

'We have no bow to shoot with, but spang [jerk] them from the nails of

our thumbs. Sometimes we will miss; but if they twitch [touch], be it

beast, or man, or woman, it will kill, tho' they had a jack [a coat of

armour] upon them. When we go in the shape of a hare, we say thrice

over:

'"I shall go into a hare,

With sorrow, and such, and mickle care;

And I shall go in the Devil's name,

Ay, until I come home [again!]."

And instantly we start in a hare. And when we would be out of that

shape, we will say:

'"Hare! hare! God send thee care!

I am in a hare's likeness just now,

But I shall be in a woman's likeness even [now]."

When we would go in the likeness of a cat, we say thrice over:

'"I shall go [intill ane cat],

[With sorrow, and such, and a black] shot!

And I shall go in the Devil's name,

Ay, until I come home again!"

And if we [would go in a crow, then] we say thrice over:

'"I shall go intill a crow,

With sorrow, and such, and a black [thraw!

And I shall go in the Devil's name,]

Ay, until I come home again!"

And when we would be out of these shapes, we say:

'"Cat, cat [or crow, crow], God send thee a black shot [or black

thraw!]

I was a cat [or crow] just now,

But I shall be [in a woman's likeness even now].

Cat, cat" [as _supra_].

If we go in the shape of a cat, a crow, a hare, or any other likeness,

etc., to any of our neighbours' houses, being witches, we will say:

'"[I (or we) conjure] thee go with us [or me]!"

And presently they become as we are, either cats, hares, crows, etc.,

and go [with us whither we would. When] we would ride, we take

windle-straws, or been-stakes [bean-stalks], and put them betwixt our

feet, and say thrice:

'"Horse and Hattock, horse and go,

Horse and pellatris, ho! ho!"

And immediately we fly away wherever we would; and lest our husbands

should miss us out of our beds, we put in a besom, or a three-legged

stool, beside them, and say thrice over:

'"I lay down this besom [or stool] in the Devil's name,

Let it not stir till I come home again!"

And immediately it seems a woman, by the side of our husband.

'We cannot turn in[to] the likeness of [a lamb or a dove?] When my

husband sold beef, I used to put a swallow's feather in the head of

the beast, and [say thrice],

'"[I] put out this beef in the Devil's name,

That mickle silver and good price come hame!"

'I did even so [whenever I put] forth either horse, nolt [cattle],

webs [of cloth], or any other thing to be sold, and still put in this

feather, and said the [same words thrice] over, to cause the

commodities sell well, and ... thrice over--

'"Our Lord to hunting he [is gone]

.......... marble stone,

He sent word to Saint Knitt ..."

'When we would heal any sore or broken limb, we say thrice over....

'"He put the blood to the blood, till all up stood;

The lith to the lith, Till all took nith;

Our Lady charmed her dearly Son, With her tooth and her tongue,

And her ten fingers--

In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost!"

'And this we say thrice over, stroking the sore, and it becomes whole.

2ndlie. For the Bean-Shaw [bone-shaw, _i.e._, the sciatica], or pain

in the haunch: "We are here three Maidens charming for the bean-shaw;

the man of the Midle-earth, blew beaver, land-fever, maneris of

stooris, the Lord fleigged (terrified) the Fiend with his holy candles

and yard foot-stone! There she sits, and here she is gone! Let her

never come here again!" 3rdli. For the fevers, we say thrice over, "I

forbid the quaking-fevers, the sea-fevers, the land-fevers, and all

the fevers that God ordained, out of the head, out of the heart, out

of the back, out of the sides, out of the knees, out of the thighs,

from the points of the fingers to the nibs of the toes; net fall the

fevers go, [some] to the hill, some to the heep, some to the stone,

some to the stock. In St. Peter's name, St. Paul's name, and all the

Saints of Heaven. In the name of the Father, the Son, and of the Holy

Ghost!" And when we took the fruit of the fishes from the fishers, we

went to the shore before the boat would come to it; and we would say,

on the shore-side, three several times over:

'"The fishers are gone to the sea,

And they will bring home fish to me;

They will bring them home intill the boat,

But they shall get of them but the smaller sort!"

So we either steal a fish, or buy a fish, or get a fish from them [for

naught], one or more. And with that we have all the fruit of the whole

fishes in the boat, and the fishes that the fishermen themselves will

have will be but froth, etc.

'The first voyage that ever I went with the rest of our Covins was

[to] Ploughlands; and there we shot a man betwixt the plough-stilts,

and he presently fell to the ground, upon his nose and his mouth; and

then the Devil gave me an arrow, and caused me shoot a woman in that

field; which I did, and she fell down dead.[51] In winter of 1660,

when Mr. Harry Forbes, Minister at Aulderne, was sick, we made a bag

of the galls, flesh, and guts of toads, pickles of barley, parings of

the nails of fingers and toes, the liver of a hare, and bits of

clouts. We steeped all this together, all night among water, all

hacked (or minced up) through other. And when we did put it among the

water, Satan was with us, and learned us the words following, to say

thrice over. They are thus:

'1st. "He is lying in his bed; he is lying sick and sore;

Let him lie intill his bed two months and [three] days more!

'2nd. "Let him lie intill his bed; let him lie intill it sick and sore;

Let him lie intill his bed months two and three days more!

'3rd. "He shall lie intill his bed, he shall lie in it sick and sore;

He shall lie intill his bed two months and three days more!"

'When we had learned all these words from the Devil, as said is, we

fell all down upon our knees, with our hair down over our shoulders

and eyes, and our hands lifted up, and our eyes [upon] the Devil, and

said the foresaid words thrice over to the Devil, strictly, against

[the recovery of] Master Harry Forbes [from his sickness]. In the

night time we came in to Mr. Harry Forbes's chamber, where he lay,

with our hands all smeared out of the bag, to swing it upon Mr. Harry,

when he was sick in his bed; and in the daytime [one of our] number,

who was most familiar and intimate with him, to wring or swing the bag

[upon the said Mr. Harry, as we could] not prevail in the night time

against him, which was accordingly done. Any of ... comes in to your

houses, or are set to do you evil, they will look uncouth--like,

thrown ... hurly-like, and their clothes standing out. The Maiden of

our Covin, Jane Martin, was [.... We] do no great matter without our

Maiden.

'And if a child be forespoken [bewitched], we take the cradle ...

through it thrice, and then a dog through it; and then shake the belt

above the fire [... and then cast it] down on the ground, till a dog

or cat go over it, that the sickness may come [... upon the dog or

cat].'

* * * * *

With these extended quotations the reader will probably be satisfied,

and in concluding my account of Isabel Gowdie, I must now adopt a

process of condensation.

Among other freaks and fancies of a disordered imagination, Isabel

declared that she merited to be stretched upon a rack of iron, and

that if torn to pieces by wild horses, the punishment would not exceed

the measure of her iniquities. These iniquities comprehended every act

attributed by the superstition of the time to the servants of the

devil, which had been carefully gathered up by this monomaniac from

contemporary witch-tradition. The cruellest thing was, that she

involved so large a number of innocent persons in the peril into

which she herself had recklessly plunged, naming nearly fifty women,

and I forget how many men, as her associates or accomplices. She

affirmed that they dug up from their graves the bodies of unbaptized

infants, and having dismembered them, made use of the limbs in their

incantations. That when they wished to destroy an enemy's crops, they

yoked toads to his plough; and on the following night the devil, with

this strange team, drove furrows into the land, and blasted it

effectually. The devil, it would seem, was so long and so incessantly

occupied with high affairs in Scotland, that surely the rest of the

world must have escaped meanwhile the evils of his interference!

Witches, added Isabel, were able to assume almost any shape, but their

usual choice was that of a hare, or perhaps a cat. There was some risk

in either assumption. Once it happened that Isabel, in her disguise of

a hare, was hotly pursued by a pack of hounds, and narrowly escaped

with her life. When she reached her cottage-door she could feel the

hot breath of her pursuers on her haunches; but, contriving to slip

behind a chest, she found time to speak the magic words which alone

could restore her to her natural shape, namely:

'Hare! hare! God send thee care!

I am in a hare's likeness now;

But I shall be a woman e'en now.

Hare! hare! God send thee care!'

If witches, while wearing the shape of hare or cat, were bitten by the

dogs, they always retained the marks on their human bodies. When the

devil called a convention of his servants, each proceeded through the

air--like the witches of Lapland and other countries--astride on a

broomstick [or it might be on a corn or bean straw], repeating as they

went the rhyme:

'Horse and paddock, horse and go,

Horse and pellatris, ho! ho!'

They usually left behind them a broom, or three-legged stool, which,

properly charmed and placed in bed, assumed a likeness to themselves

until they returned, and prevented suspicion. This seems to have been

the practice of witches everywhere. Witches specially favoured by

their master were provided with a couple of imps as attendants, who

boasted such very mundane names as 'The Roaring Lion,' 'Thief of

Hell,' 'Ranting Roarer,' and 'Care for Nought'--a great improvement on

the vulgar monosyllables worn by the English imps--and were dressed,

as already described, in distinguishing liveries: sea-green,

pea-green, grass-green, sad-dun, and yellow. The witches were never

allowed--at least, not in the infernal presence--to call themselves,

or one another, by their baptismal names, but were required to use the

appellations bestowed on the devil when he rebaptized them, such as

'Blue Kail,' 'Raise the Wind,' 'Batter-them-down Maggie,' and 'Able

and Stout.' The reader will find in the reports of the trial much more

of this grotesque nonsense--the vapourings of a distempered brain. The

judges, however, took it seriously, and Isabel Gowdie, or Gilbert,

and many of her presumed accomplices, were duly strangled and burned

(in April, 1662).

FOOTNOTES:

[46] So the witch in 'Macbeth' (Act I., sc. 3) says:

'In a sieve I'll thither sail.'

[47] It is a singular circumstance, as Pitcairn remarks, that in

almost all the confessions of witches, or at least of the Scottish

witches, their initiation, and many of their meetings, are said to

have taken place within churches, churchyards, and consecrated ground;

and a certain ritual, in imitation, or mockery, of the forms of the

Church, is uniformly said to have been gone through.

[48] In the Forfarshire reports, alluded to on p. 332, the witches

always speak of the devil's body and kiss as deadly cold.

[49] Pitcairn remarks, with justice, that the above details are,

perhaps, in all respects the most extraordinary in the history of

witchcraft of this or of any other country. Isabel Gowdie must have

been a woman with a powerful and rank imagination, who, had she lived

in the present day, might, perhaps, have produced a work of fiction of

the school of Zola.

[50] There are mutilations in the original manuscript, and the

bracketed words are conjectural.

[51] These, it is needless to say, were pure inventions, and by no

means amusing ones.

CASE OF JANET WISHART.

The case of Janet Wishart, wife of John Leyis, carries us away to the

North of Scotland. It presents some peculiar features, and therefore I

shall put it before the reader, with no more abridgment than is

absolutely needful. It is of much earlier date than the preceding.[52]

'i. In the month of April, or thereabout, in 1591, in the "gricking"

of the day, [that is, in the dawn,] Janet Wishart, on her way back

from the blockhouse and Fattie, where she had been holding conference

with the devil, pursued Alexander Thomson, mariner, coming forth of

Aberdeen to his ship, ran between him and Alexander Fidler, under the

Castle Hill, as swift, it appeared to him, as an arrow could be shot

forth of a bow, going betwixt him and the sun, and cast her "cantrips"

in his way. Whereupon, the said Alexander Thomson took an immediate

"fear and trembling," and was forced to hasten home, take to his bed,

and lie there for the space of a month, so that none believed he would

live;--one half of the day burning in his body, as if he had been

roasting in an oven, with an extreme feverish thirst, "so that he

could never be satisfied of drink," the other half of the day melting

away his body with an extraordinarily cold sweat. And Thomson, knowing

she had cast this kind of witchcraft upon him, sent his wife to

threaten her, that, unless she at once relieved him, he would see that

she was burnt. And she, fearing lest he should accuse her, sent him by

the two women a certain kind of beer and some other drugs to drink,

after which Thomson mended daily, and recovered his former health.'

It is to be noted that Janet flatly denied the coming of Mrs. Thomson

on any such errand.

'ii. Seven years before, on St. Bartholomew's Day, when Andrew Ardes,

webster [weaver], in his play, took a linen towel, and put it about

the said Janet's neck, not fearing any evil from her, or that she

would be offended, Janet, "in a devilish fury and wodnes" [madness],

exclaimed, "Why teasest thou me? Thou shalt die! I shall give bread to

my bairns this towmound [twelvemonth], but thou shalt not bide a month

with thine to give them bread." And immediately after the said

Andrew's departure from her, he took to his bed for the space of eight

days: the one half of the day roasting in his whole body as in a

furnace, and the other half with a vehement sweat melting away; so

that, by her cruel murther and witchcraft, the said Andrew Ardes died

within eight days. And the day after his departure, his widow,

"contracting a high displeasure," took to her bed, and within a month

deceased; so that all their bairns are now begging their meat.'

This was testified to be true by Elspeth Ewin, spouse to James Mar,

mariner, but was denied by the accused.

'iii. Twenty-four years ago, in the month of May, when she dwelt on

the School Hill, next to Adam Mair's, she was descried by Andrew

Brabner the younger, John Leslie, of the Gallowgate, Robert Sanders,

wright, Andrew Simson, tailor, and one Johnson, who were then

schoolboys, stealing forth from the said Adam Mair's yard, at two in

the morning, "greyn growand bear;" and instantly, being pointed out by

the said scholars to the wife of the said Adam, she, in her fury,

burst forth upon the scholars: "Well have ye schemed me, but I shall

gar the best of you repent!" And she added that, ere four in the

afternoon, she would make as many wonder at them as should see them.

Upon the same day, between two and three in the afternoon, the said

scholars passed to the Old Watergang in the Links to wash themselves;

and after they had done so, and dried, the said John Leslie and

Johnson took a race beside the Watergang, and desperately threw

themselves into the midst of the Watergang, and were drowned, through

the witchcraft which Janet had cast upon them. And thus, as she had

promised, she did murder them.'

This was testified by Robert Sanders and Andrew Simson, but was denied

by the accused.

'iv. Sixteen years since, or thereby, she [the accused] and Malcolm

Carr's wife, having fallen at variance and discord, she openly vowed

that the latter should be confined to her bed for a year and a day,

and should not make for herself a single cake: immediately after which

discord, the said Malcolm's wife went to her own house, sought her

bed, and lay half a year bed-stricken by the witchcraft Janet had cast

upon her, according to her promise; one half of the day burning up her

whole body as in a fiery furnace, the other half melting away her body

with an extraordinary sweat, with a _congealed coldness_.'

v. She was also accused of lending to Meryann Nasmith a pair of

head-sheets in childbed, into which she put her witchcraft: which

sheets, as soon as she knew they had taken heat about the woman's

head, immediately she went and took them from her; and before she

[Janet] was well out of the house, Meryann went out of her mind, and

was bound hand and foot for three days.

vi. Three years since, or thereby, James Ailhows, having been a long

time in her service, Janet desired him to continue with her, and on

his refusing, 'Gang where you please,' she said, 'I will see that you

do not earn a single cake of bread for a year and a day.' And as soon

as he quitted her service, he was seized with an extremely heavy

sickness and (wodnes) delirium, with a continual burning heat and cold

sweating, and lay bedfast half a year, according to her promise,

through the devilish witchcraft she had cast upon him. So that he was

compelled to send to Benia for another witch to take the witchcraft

from him: who came to this town and washed him in water _running

south_, and put him through a girth, with some other ceremonies that

she used. And he paid her seventeen marks, and by her help recovered

health again.

vii. For twenty years past she continually and nightly, after eleven

o'clock, when her husband and servants had gone to their beds, put on

a great fire, and kept it up all night, and sat before it using

witchcraft, altogether contrary to the nature of well-living persons.

And on those nights when she did not make up the fire, she went out of

the house, and stayed away all night where she pleased.

viii. She caused ...., then in her service, and lately shepherd to Mr.

Alexander Fraser, to take certain drugs of witchcraft made by her,

such as old shoon, and cast them in the fire of John Club, stabler,

her neighbour; since which time, through her witchcraft, the said John

Club has become completely impoverished.

ix. She and Janet Patton having fallen into variance and discord,

Janet Patton called the witch 'Karling,' to whom she answered that she

would give her to understand if she was a witch, and would try her

skill upon her. And immediately afterwards, Janet Patton [like

everybody else concerned in these mysterious doings] took to her bed,

with a vehement, great, and extraordinary sickness, for one half the

day, from her middle up, burning as in a fiery furnace, with an

insatiable drought, which she could not slake; the other half-day,

melting away with sweat, and from her middle down as cold as ice, so

that through the witchcraft cast upon her she died within a month.

x. The particulars given of the case of James Lowe, stabler, are

almost the same. He refused to lend his kill and barn, and on the same

day he was seized with this remarkable sickness--half a day burning

hot, and half a day ice-cold. On his death-bed he accused Janet

Wishart of being the cause of his misfortune, saying, "That if he had

lent to her his kill and kilbarn, he wald haf bene ane lewand man."

His wife and only son died of the same kind of disease, and his whole

gear, amounting to more than £3,000, was altogether wracked and thrown

away, so that there was left no memory of the said James, succession

of his body, nor of their gear.

xi. John Pyet, stabler, is named as another victim.

xii. There is an air of novelty about the next case, that of John

Allan, cutler, Janet Wishart's son-in-law. Quarrelling with his wife,

he 'dang' her, 'whereupon Mistress Allan complained to her mother, who

immediately betook herself to her son-in-law's house, 'bostit' him,

and promised to gar him repent that ever he saw or kent her. Shortly

afterwards, either she or the devil her master, in the likeness of a

brown tyke, came nightly for five or six weeks to his window, forced

it open, leaped upon the said John, dang and buffeted him, while

always sparing his wife, who lay in bed with him, so that the said

John became half-wod and furious.' And this persecution continued,

until he threatened to inform the ministry and kirk-session.

xiii. The next case must be given verbatim, it is so striking an

example of ignorant prejudice:

'Four years since, or thereby, she came in to Walter Mealing's

dwelling-house, in the Castlegate of Aberdeen, to buy wool, which they

refused to sell. Thereafter, she came to the said Walter's bairn,

sitting on her mother's knee, and the said Walter played with her. And

she said, "This is a comely child, a fine child," without any further

words, and would not say "God save her!" And before she reached the

stair-foot, the bairn, by her witchcraft, in presence of both her

father and mother, "cast her gall," changed her colour like dead, and

became as weak as "ane pair of glwffis," and melted continually away

with an extraordinary sweating and extreme drought, which that same

day eight days, at the same hour, she came in first, and then the

bairn departed. And for no request nor command of the said Walter, nor

others whom he directed, she would not come in again to the house to

"visie" the bairn, although she was oft and divers times sent for,

both by the father and mother of the bairn, and so by her witchcraft

she murdered the bairn.'

xiv. On Yule Eve, in '94, at three in the morning, Janet, remaining in

Gilbert Mackay's stair in the Broadgate, perceived Bessie Schives,

spouse of Robert Blinschell, going forth of her own house to the

dwelling-house of James Davidson, notary, to his wife, who was in

travail. She came down the stair, and cast her cantrips and witchcraft

in her way, and the said Bessie being in perfect health of body, and

as blithe and merry as ever she was in her days, when she went out of

the same James Davidson's house, or ever she could win up her own

stair, took a great fear and trembling that she might scarcely win up

her own stair, and immediately after her up-coming, went to her naked

bed, lay continually for the space of eighteen weeks fast bed-sick,

bewitched by Janet Wishart, the one half-day roasting as in a fiery

furnace, with an extraordinary kind of drought, that she could not be

slaked, and the other half-day in an extraordinary kind of sweating,

melting, and consuming her body, as a white burning candle, which kind

of sickness is a special point of witchcraft; and the said Bessie

Schives saw none other but Janet only, who is holden and reputed a

common witch.

xv. At Midsummer was a year or thereby, Elspeth Reid, her

daughter-in-law, came into her house at three in the morning, and

found her sitting, mother naked as she was born, at the fireside, and

another old wife siclike mother naked, sitting between her

shoulders[!], making their cantrips, whom the said Elspeth seeing,

after she said 'God speed,' immediately went out of the house;

thereafter, on the same day, returned again, and asked of her, what

she was doing with that old wife? To whom she answered, that she was

charming her. And as soon as the said Elspeth went forth again from

Janet Wishart's house, immediately she took an extraordinary kind of

sickness, and became 'like a dead senseless fool,' and so continued

for half a year.

xvi. She [Janet] and her daughter, Violet Leyis, desired ... her woman

to go with her said daughter, at twelve o'clock at night, to the

gallows, and cut down the dead man hanging thereon, and take a part of

all his members from him, and burn the corpse, which her servant

would not do, and, therefore, she was instantly sent away.

xvii. The following deposition is, however, the most singular of all:

Twelve years since, or thereby, Janet came into Katherine Rattray's,

behind the Tolbooth, and while she was drinking in the said

Katherine's cellar, Katherine reproved her for drinking in her house,

because, she said, she was a witch. Whereupon, she took a cup full of

ale, and cast it in her face, and said that if she were indeed a

witch, the said Katherine should have proof of it; and immediately

after she had quitted the cellar, the barm of the said Katherine's ale

all sank to the bottom of the stand, and no had abaid [a bead] thereon

during the space of sixteen weeks. And the said Katherine finding

herself 'skaithit,' complained to her daughter, Katherine Ewin, who

was then in close acquaintance with Janet, that she had bewitched her

mother's ale; and immediately thereafter the said Katherine Ewin

called on Janet, and said, 'Why bewitched you my mother's ale?' and

requested her to help the same again. Which Janet promised, if

Katherine Ewin obeyed her instructions ... to rise early before the

sun, without commending herself to God, or speaking, and neither

suining herself nor her son sucking on her breast; to go, still

without speaking, to the said Katherine Rattray's house, and not to

cross any water, nor wash her hands; and enter into the said Katherine

Rattray's house, where she would find her servant brewing, and say to

her thrice, 'I to God, and thou to the devil!' and to restore the

same barm where it was again; 'and to take up thrie dwattis on the

southt end of the gauttreyis, and thair scho suld find ane peice of

claithe, fowr newikit, with greyn, red, and blew, and thrie corss of

clewir girss, and cast the same in the fyir; quhilk beand cassin in,

her barm suld be restorit to hir againe, lyik as it was restorit in

effect.' And the said Katherine Ewin, when cracking [gossiping] with

her neighbours, said she could learn them a charm she had gotten from

Janet Wishart, which when the latter heard, she promised to do her an

evil turn, and immediately her son, sucking on her breast, died. And

at her first browst, or brewing, thereafter, the whole wort being

played and put in 'lumes,' the doors fast, and the keys at her own

belt, the whole wort was taken away, and the haill lumes fundin dry,

and the floor dry, and she could never get trial where it yird to. And

when the said Katherine complained to the said Janet Wishart, and dang

herself and her good man both, for injuries done to her by taking of

her son's life and her wort [which Katherine seems to have thought of

about equal value], she promised that all should be well, giving her

her draff for payment. And the said Katherine, with her husband

Ambrose Gordon, being in their beds, could not for the space of twenty

days be quit of a cat, lying nightly in their bed, between the two,

and taking a great bite out of Ambrose's arm, as yet the place

testifies, and when they gave up the draff, the cat went away.

Some fourteen more charges were brought against her. She was tried on

February 17, 1596, before the Provost and Baillies of Aberdeen, and

found guilty upon eighteen counts of being a common witch and

sorcerer. Sentence of death by burning was recorded against her, and

she suffered on the same day as another reputed witch, Isabel Cocker.

The expenses of their execution are preserved in the account-books of

the Dean of Guild, 1596-1597, and prove that witch-burning was a

luxury scarcely within the reach of the many.

JANETT WISCHART AND ISSBEL COCKER.

_Item._ For twentie loades of peattes to burne

thame xl_sh._

_Item._ For ane Boile of Coillis xxiiii_sh._

_Item._ For four Tar barrellis xxvi_sh._ viii_d._

_Item._ For fyr and Iron barrellis xvi_sh._ viii_d._

_Item._ For a staik and dressing of it xvi_sh._

_Item._ For four fudoms [fathoms?] of Towis iiii_sh._

_Item._ For careing the peittis, coillis, and

barrellis to the Hill viii_sh._ iiii_d._

_Item._ To on Justice for their execution xiii_sh._ iiii_d._

--------------------

cliv _shillings_.

--------------------

On several occasions commissions were issued by the King, in favour of

the Provost and some of the Baillies of the burgh, and the Sheriff of

the county, for the purpose of 'haulding Justice Courtis on Witches

and Sorceraris.' These commissioners gave warrants in their turn to

the minister and elders of each parish in the shire, to examine

parties suspected of witchcraft, and to frame a 'dittay' or indictment

against such persons. It was an inevitable result that all the

scandalous gossip of the community was assiduously collected; while

any individual who had become, from whatsoever cause, an object of

jealousy or dislike to her neighbours, was overwhelmed by a mass of

hearsay or fictitious evidence, and by the conscious or unconscious

exaggerations of ignorance, credulity, or malice.

As an example of the kind of stuff stirred up by this parochial

inquisition, I shall take the return furnished to the commissioners by

Mr. John Ross, minister of Lumphanan:

'i. _Elspet Strathauchim_, in Wartheil, is indicted to have charmed

Maggie Clarke, spouse to Patrick Bunny, for the fevers, this last

year, with "ane sleipth and ane thrum" [a sleeve and thread]. She is

indicted, this last Hallow e'en, to have brought forth of the house a

burning coal, and buried the same in her own yard. She is indicted to

have bewitched Adam Gordon, in Wark, and to have been the cause of his

death, and that because, she coming out of his service without his

leave, he detained some of her gear, which she promised to do; and

after his death wanted [to have it believed] that she had gotten

"assythment" of him. She is indicted to have said to Marcus Gillam, at

the Burn of Camphil, that none of his bairns should live, because he

would not marry her; which is come to pass, for two of them are dead.

She is indicted continually to have resorted to Margaret Baine her

company.

'ii. _Isabel Forbes._--She is indicted to have bewitched Gilbert

Makim, in Glen Mallock, with a spindle, a "rok," and a "foil;" as

Isabel Ritchie likewise testified.

'iii. _James Og_ is indicted to have passed on Rud-day, five years

since, through Alexander Cobain's corn, and have taken nine stones

from his "avine rig" [corn-rick], and cast on the said Alexander's

"rig," and to have taken nine "lokis" [handfuls] of meal from the said

Alexander's "rig," and cast on his own. He is indicted to have

bewitched a cow belonging to the said Alexander, which he bought from

Kristane Burnet, of Cloak; this cow, though his wife had received milk

from her the first night, and the morning thereafter, gave no milk

from that time forth, but died within half a year. He is indicted to

have passed, five years since, on Lammas-Day, through the said

Alexander's corn, and having "gaine nyne span," to have struck the

corn with nine strokes of a white wand, so that nothing grew that year

but "fichakis." He is indicted that, in the year aforesaid or

thereabouts, having corn to dry, he borrowed fire from his neighbour,

haiffing of his avine them presently; and took a "brine" of the corn

on his back, and cast it three times "woodersonis" [or "withersonis,"

_ut supra_, that is, west to east, in the direction contrary to the

sun's course] above the "kill." He is indicted that, three years

since, Alexander Cobaine being in Leith, with the Laird of Cors, his

"wittual," he came up early one morning, at the back of the said

Alexander's yard, with a dish full of water in his hand, and to have

cast the water in the gate to the said Alexander's door, and then

perceiving that David Duguid, servant to the said Alexander, was

beholding him, to have fled suddenly; which the said David also

testifies.

'iv. _Agnes Frew._--She is indicted to have taken three hairs out of

her own cow's tail, and to have cut the same in small pieces, and to

have put them in her cow's throat, which thereafter gave milk, and the

neighbours' none. Also, she is indicted that [she took] William

Browne's calf in her axter, and charmed the same, as, also, she took

the clins [hoofs] from forefeitt aff it, with a piece of "euerry

bing," and caused the said William's wife to "yeird" the same; which

the said William's wife confessed, albeit not in this manner. Also,

she took up Alexander Tailzier's calf, lately [directly] after it was

calved, and carried it three times about the cow. Also, she was seen

casting a horse's fosser on a cow.

'v. _Isabel Roby._--She is indicted to have bidden her gudeman, when

he went to St. Fergus to buy cattle, that if he bought any before his

home-coming, he should go three times "woodersonis" about them, and

then take three "ruggis" off a dry hillock, and fetch home to her.

Also, that dwelling at Ardmair, there came in a poor man craving alms,

to whom she offered milk, but he refused it, because, as he then

presently said, she had three folks' milk and her own in the pan; and

when Elspet Mackay, then present, wondered at it, he said, "Marvel

not, for she has thy farrow kye's milk also in her pan." Also, she is

commonly seen in the form of a hare, passing through the town, for as

soon as the hare vanishes out of sight, she appears.

'vi. _Margaret Rianch_, in Green Cottis, was seen in the dawn of the

day by James Stevens embracing every nook of John Donaldson's house

three times, who continually thereafter was diseased, and at last

died. She said to John Ritchie, when he took a tack [a piece of

ground] in the Green Cottis, that his gear from that day forth should

continually decay, and so it came to pass. Also, she cast a number of

stones in a tub, amongst water, which thereafter was seen dancing.

When she clips her sheep, she turns the bowl of the shears three times

in their mouth. Also, James Stevens saw her meeting John Donaldson's

"hoggs" [sheep a year old] in the burn of the Green Cottis, and

casting the water out between her feet backward, in the sheep's face,

and so they all died. Also she confessed to Patrick Gordon, of

Kincragie, and James Gordon, of Drumgase, that the devil was in the

bed between her and William Ritchie, her harlot, and he was upon them

both, and that if she happened to die for witchcraft, that he

[Ritchie] should also die, for if she was a devil, he was too.

'There are three of these persons, Elspeet Strathauchim, James Og, and

Agnes Frew, whose accusations the Presbytery of Kincardine, within

whose bounds they dwell, counted insufficient, having duly considered

the whole circumstances, always remitted them to the trial of an

assize, if the judges thought it expedient.

'[Signed] Mr. Jhone Ros,

'Minister at Lumphanan.'

It would not be easy to find a more painful exhibition of clerical

ignorance and incapacity. Probably many of the allegations which Mr.

John Ross records are true, as the practice of charms was common

enough among the peasantry both of Scotland and England, and is even

yet not wholly extinct; but, taken altogether, they did not amount to

witchcraft, the very essence of which was a compact with the devil,

and in no one of the preceding cases is such a compact mentioned. And

one must take the existence of the gross superstition and credulity

which is here disclosed to be irrefutable testimony that, as a pastor

and teacher, Mr. John Ross was a signal failure at Lumphanan.

* * * * *

I have already alluded to those pathetic instances of self-delusion in

which the reputed witch has been her own enemy, and furnished the

evidence needed for her condemnation in her own confession--a

confession of acts which she must have known had never occurred;

building up a strange fabric of fiction, and perishing beneath its

weight. It would seem as if some of these unfortunate women came to

believe in themselves because they found that others believed in them,

and assumed that they really possessed the powers of witchcraft

because their neighbours insisted that it was so. Nor will this be

thought such an improbable explanation when it is remembered that

history affords more than one example of prophets and founders of new

religions whom the enthusiastic devotion of their followers has

persuaded into a belief in the authenticity of the credentials which

they themselves had originally forged, and the truth of the

revelations which they had invented.

From this point of view a profound interest attaches to the official

'dittay' or accusation against one Helen Fraser, who was convicted and

sentenced to death in April, 1597, since it shows that she was

condemned principally upon the evidence which she herself supplied:

'i. John Ramsay, in Newburght, being sick of a consuming disease, sent

to her house, in Aikinshill, to seek relief, and was told by her that

she would do what lay in her power for the recovery of his health; but

bade him keep secret whatever she spake or did, because the world was

evil, and spoke no good of such mediciners. She commanded the said

John to rise early in the morning, to eat "sourrakis" about sunrise,

while the dew was still upon them; also to eat "valcars," and to make

"lavrie" kale and soup. Moreover, to sit down in a door, before the

fowls flew to their roost, and to open his breast, that when the fowls

flew to the roost over him he might receive the wind of their wings

about his breast, for that was very profitable to loose his

heart-pipes, which were closed. But before his departure from her, she

made him sit down, bare-headed, on a stool, and said an orison thrice

upon his head, in which she named the Devil.

'ii. _Item._--The said Helen publicly confessed in Foverne, after her

apprehension, that she was a common abuser of the people; and that,

further, to sustain herself and her bairns, she pretended knowledge

which she had not, and undertook to do things which she could not.

This was her answer, when she was accused by the minister of Foverne,

for that she abused the people, and when he inquired the cause of her

evil report throughout the whole country. This she confessed upon the

green of Foverne, before the laird, the minister, and reader of

Foverne, Patrick Findlay in Newburght, and James Menzies at the New

Mills of Foverne.

'iii. _Item._--Janet Ingram, wife to Adam Finnie, dwelling for the

time at the West burn, in Balhelueis, being sick, and affirming

herself to be bewitched, for she herself was esteemed by all men to be

a witch, she sent for the said Helen Frazer to cure her. The said

Helen came, and tarried with her till her departure and burial, and at

her coming assured the said Janet that within a short time she would

be well enough. But the sickness of the said Janet increased, and was

turned into a horrible fury and madness, in such sort that she always

and incessantly blasphemed, and pressed at all times to climb up the

wall after the "heillis" and scraped the wall with her hands. After

that she had been grievously vexed for the space of two days from the

coming of Helen Frazer, her mediciner, to her, she departed this life.

Being dead, her husband went to charge his neighbours to convey her

burial, but before his returning, or the coming of any neighbour to

the carrying of the corpse, the said Helen Frazer, together with two

or three daughters of the said Janet (whereof one yet living, to wit,

Malye Finnie, in the Blairtoun of Balhelueis, is counted a witch),

had taken up the corpse, and had carried her, they alone, the half of

the distance to the kirk, until they came to the Moor of Cowhill; when

the said Adam and others his neighbours came to them, and at their

coming the said Helen fled away through the moss to Aikinshill, and

went no further towards the kirk.

'iv. _Item._--A horse of Duncan Alexander, in Newburcht, being

bewitched, the said Helen translated the sickness from the horse to a

young cow of the said Duncan; which cow died, and was cast into the

burn of the Newburcht, for no man would eat her.

'v. _Item._--The said Helen made a compact with certain laxis fishers

of the Newburcht, at the kirk of Foverne, in Mallie Skryne's house,

and promised to cause them to fish well, and to that effect received

of them a piece of salmon to handle at her pleasure for accomplishing

the matter. Upon the morrow she came to the Newburcht, to the house of

John Ferguson, a laxis fisher, and delivered unto him in a closet four

cuts of salmon with a penny; after that she called him out of his own

house, from the company that was there drinking with him, and bade him

put the same in the horn of his coble, and he should have a dozen of

fish at the first shot; which came to pass.

'vi. _Item._--The said Helen, by witchcraft, enticed Gilbert Davidson,

son to William Davidson, in Lytoune of Meanye, to love and marry

Margaret Strauthachin (in the Hill of Balgrescho) directly against

the will of his parents, to the utter wreck of the said Gilbert.

'vii. _Item._--At the desire of the said Margaret Strauthachin, by

witchcraft, the said Helen made Catherine Fetchil, wife to William

Davidson, furious, because she was against the marriage, and took the

strength of her left side and arm from her; in the which fury and

feebleness the said Catherine died.

'viii. _Item._--The said Helen, at the desire of the foresaid Margaret

Strauthachin, bewitched William Hill, dwelling for the time at the

Hill of Balgrescho, through which he died in a fury [_i.e._, a fit of

delirium].

'ix. Moreover, at the desire foresaid, the said Helen by witchcraft

slew an ox belonging to the said William; for while Patrick Hill, son

to the said William, and herd to his father, called in the cattle to

the fold, at twelve o'clock, the said Helen was sitting in the yeite,

and immediately after the outcoming of the cattle out of the fold, the

best ox of the whole herd instantly died.

'x. _Item._--The said Helen counselled Christane Henderson, vulgarly

called mickle Christane, to put one hand to the crown of her head, and

the other to the sole of her foot, and so surrender whatever was

between her hands, and she should want nothing that she could wish or

desire.

'xi. _Item._--The said Christane Henderson, being henwife in Foverne,

the young fowls died thick; for remedy whereof, the said Helen bade

the said Christane take all the chickens or young fowls, and draw

them through the link of the crook, and take the hindmost, and slay

with a fiery stick, which thing being practised, none died thereafter

that year.

'xii. _Item._--When the said Helen was dwelling in the Moorhill of

Foverne, there came a hare betimes, and sucked a milch cow pertaining

to William Findlay, at the Mill of the Newburght, whose house was

directly afornent the said Helen's house, on the other side of the

Burn of Foverne, wherethrough the cow pined away, and gave blood

instead of milk. This mischief was by all men attributed to the said

Helen, and she herself cannot deny but she was commonly evil spoken of

for it, and affirmed, after her apprehension at Foverne, that she was

so slandered.

'xiii. _Item._--When Alexander Hardy, in Aikinshill, departed this

life, it grieved and troubled his conscience very mickle, that he had

been a defender of the said Helen, and especially that he, accompanied

with Malcolm Forbes, travailed, against their conscience, with sundry

of the assessors when she suffered an assize, and especially with the

Chancellor of the Assize, in her favour, he knowing evidently her to

be guilty of death.

'xiv. _Item._--The said Helen being a domestic in the said Alexander

Hardy's house, disagreed with one of the said Alexander's servants,

named Andrew Skene, and intending to bewitch the said servant, the

evil fell upon Alexander, and he died thereof.

'xv. _Item._--When Robert Goudyne, now in Balgrescho, was dwelling in

Blairtoun of Balheluies, a discord fell out betwixt Elizabeth

Dempster, nurse to the said Robert for the time, and Christane

Henderson, one of the said Helen's familiars, as her own confession

aforesaid purports, and the country well knows. Upon the which

discord, the said Christane threatened the said Elizabeth with an evil

turn, and to the performing thereof, brought the said Helen Frazer to

the said Robert's house, and caused her to repair oft thereto. After

what time, immediately both the said Elizabeth and the infant to whom

she gave suck, by the devilry of the said Helen, fell into a consuming

sickness, whereof both died. And also Elspet Cheyne, spouse to the

said Robert, fell into the selfsame sickness, and was heavily diseased

thereby for the space of two years before the recovery of his health.

'xvi. _Item._--By witchcraft the said Helen abstracted and withdrew

the love and affection of Andrew Tilliduff of Rainstoune, from his

spouse Isabel Cheyne, to Margaret Neilson, and so mightily bewitched

him, that he could never be reconciled with his wife, or remove his

affection from the said harlot; and when the said Margaret was

begotten with child, the said Helen conveyed her away to Cromar to

obscure the fact.

'xvii. _Item._--Wherever the said Helen is known, or has repaired

there many years bygone, she has been, and is reported by all, of

whatsoever estate or sex, to be a common and abominable witch, and to

have learned the same of the late Maly Skene, spouse to the late

Cowper Watson, with whom, during her lifetime, the said Helen had

continual society. The said Maly was bruited to be a rank witch, and

her said husband suffered death for the same crime.

'xviii. _Item._--When Robert Merchant, in the Newbrucht, had

contracted marriage, and holden house for the space of two years with

the late Christane White, it happened to him to pass to the Moorhill

of Foverne, to sow corn to the late Isabel Bruce, the relict of the

late Alexander Frazer, the said Helen Frazer being familiar and

actually resident in the house of the said Isabel, she was there at

his coming: from the which time forth the said Robert _found his

affection violently and extraordinarily drawn away from the said

Christane to the said Isabel_, a great love being betwixt him and the

said Christane always theretofore, and no break of love, or discord,

falling out or intervening upon either of their parts, which thing the

country supposed and spake to be brought about by the unlawful

travails of the said Helen.

'[Signed] Thomas Tilideff,

'Minister, at Fovern, with my hand.

'_Item._--A common witch by open voice and common fame.'

* * * * *

I have given this 'dittay' in full, from a conviction that no summary

would do justice to its terrible simplicity. Upon the evidence which

it afforded, Helen Frazer was brought before the Court of Justiciary,

in Aberdeen, on April 21, 1597, and found guilty in 'fourteen points

of witchcraft and sorcery.'

The burning of witches went merrily on, so that the authorities of

Aberdeen were compelled to get in an adequate stock of fuel. We note

in the municipal accounts, under the date of March 10, that there was

'bocht be the comptar, and laid in be him in the seller in the

Chappell of the Castel hill, ane chalder of coillis, price thairof,

with the bieing and metting of the same, xvi_lib._ iiii_sh._' As is

usually the case, the frequency of these sad exhibitions whetted at

first the public appetite for them; it grew by what it fed on. One of

the items of expense in the execution of a witch named Margaret Clerk,

is for carrying of 'four sparris, _to withstand the press of the

pepill_, quhairof thair was twa broken, viiis. viiid.'

Among the victims committed to the flames in 1596-97, we read the

names of 'Katherine Fergus and [Sculdr], Issobel Richie, Margaret Og,

Helene Rodger, Elspet Hendersoun, Katherine Gerard, Christin Reid,

Jenet Grant, Helene Frasser, Katherine Ferrers, Helene Gray, Agnes

Vobster, Jonat Douglas, Agnes Smelie, Katherine Alshensur, and ane

other witche, callit ....'--seventeen in all. That during their

imprisonment they were treated with barbarous rigour, may be inferred

from the following entries:

_Item._ To Alexander Reid, smyth, for _twa

pair of scheckellis_ to the Witches in the

Stepill xxxii_sh._

_Item._ To John Justice, for _burning vpon the

cheik_ of four seurerall personis suspect of

witchcraft and baneschit xxvi_sh._ viii_d._

_Item._ Givin to Alexander Home for macking

of _joggis, stapillis, and lockis_ to the

witches, during the haill tyme forsaid xlvi_sh._ viii_d._

Expense on Witches aucht-score, xlii_li._ xvii_sh._ iiii_d._

On September 21, 1597, the Provost, Baillies and Council of Aberdeen

considered the faithfulness shown by William Dun, the Dean of Guild,

in the discharge of his duty, 'and, besides this, _his extraordinarily

taking pains in the burning of the great number of the witches burnt

this year_, and on the four pirates, and bigging of the port on the

Brig of Dee, repairing of the Grey Friars kirk and steeple thereof,

and thereby has been abstracted from his trade of merchandise,

continually since he was elected in the said office. Therefore, in

recompense of his extraordinary pains, and in satisfaction thereof

(not to induce any preparative to Deans of Guild to crave a recompense

hereafter), but to encourage others to travail as diligently in the

discharge of their office, granted and assigned to him the sum of

forty-seven pounds three shillings and fourpence, owing by him of the

rest of his compt of the unlawis [fines] of the persons convict for

slaying of black fish, and discharged him thereof by their presents

for ever.'

At length a wholesome reaction took place; the public grew weary of

the number of executions, and, encouraged by this change of

sentiment, persons accused of witchcraft boldly rebutted the charge,

and laid complaints against their accusers for defamation of

character. In official circles, it is true, a belief in the alleged

crime lingered long. As late as 1669, 'the new and old Councils taking

into their serious consideration that many malefices were committed

and done by several persons in this town, who are _mala fama_, and

suspected guilty of witchcraft upon many of the inhabitants of this

town, several ways, and that it will be necessary for suppressing the

like in time coming, and for punishing the said persons who shall be

found guilty; therefore they do unanimously conclude and ordain that

any such person, who is suspect of the like malefices, may be seized

upon, and put in prisoun, and that a Commission be sent for, for

putting of them to trial, that condign justice may be executed upon

them, as the nature of the offence does merit.' No more victims,

however, were sacrificed; nor does it appear that any accusation of

witchcraft was preferred.

According to Sir Walter Scott, a woman was burnt as a witch in

Scotland as late as 1722, by Captain Ross, sheriff-depute of

Sutherland; but this was, happily, an exceptional barbarity, and for

some years previously the pastime of witch-burning had practically

been extinct. It is a curious fact that educated Scotchmen, as I have

already noted, retained their superstition long after the common

people had abandoned it. In 1730, Professor Forbes, of Glasgow,

published his 'Institutes of the Law of Scotland,' in which he spoke

of witchcraft as 'that black art whereby strange and wonderful things

are wrought by power derived from the devil,' and added: 'Nothing

seems plainer to me than that there may be and have been witches, and

that perhaps such are now actually existing.' Six years later, the

Seceders from the Church of Scotland, who professed to be the true

representatives of its teaching, strongly condemned the repeal of the

laws against witchcraft, as 'contrary,' they said, 'to the express

letter of the law of God.' But they were hopelessly behind the time;

public opinion, as the result of increased intelligence, had numbered

witchcraft among the superstitions of the past, and we may confidently

predict that its revival is impossible.

FOOTNOTE:

[52] From the 'Records of the Burgh of Aberdeen,' printed for the

Spalding Club, 1841.

Witch, Warlock, and Magician Historical Sketches of Magic and Witchcraft in England and Scotland · 第 4 / 5 章