JAMES S. HINE.

It seems that nearly every author who has considered these two species

has compared them. Considering general appearances they are much alike

but can be separated easily by several details and as I have good

material of both sexes of the two species before me, I thought it

might be of consequence to consider in a comparative way some of their

characteristics.

The occiput in both sexes of _villosipes_ bears a prominent tooth at

the middle of its upper edge. This tooth varies some in different

specimens, it ends above in a single point or it may be widened and end

above in three or more points. In _furcifer_ there is no tooth on the

occiput in either sex.

The vulvar scales are very different, in _villosipes_ the part may

be said to be triangular with the free sides curved and the apical

part divided for about half the length of the scale. In _furcifer_

its basal part is similar but the apical part is produced, giving

quite a different form. In the former species the scale is about

one-third as long as the ninth segment, while in the latter it is about

three-eighths as long as that segment.

The abdominal appendages of the male are different. From dorsal view

those of _furcifer_ are rectangular with the inner distal angle very

much produced inward and backward; in _villosipes_ they are wide at

base, oblong, with the outer distal part broadly rounded and the

corresponding inner part produced directly backward. The hamules are

characteristic and may be explained best by reference to the figures.

The two species are colored much alike but _furcifer_ is darker.

The tenth abdominal segment may be said to be yellow in both but in

_furcifer_ the sides of the segment are dark, oftentimes black.

They agree in habits, both preferring to fly over stagnant water where

the males come to rest on floating objects or on the ground at the

water’s edge. I have observed the female of _furcifer_ ovipositing in

stagnant water among lily pads and other aquatic plants. Her flight is

slow while thus engaged, and her actions more like a _Libellula_ than

the usual _Gomphus_.

The Ohio naturalist, Vol. 1, No. 4, February 1901 · 第 15 / 25 题