===================================================+=============

Net interest on funded debt | $282,354,000

Interest on current liabilities | 31,835,708

Rent paid for lease of roads | 113,529,261

Net dividends | 104,074,006

+-------------

Total | $531,792,975

---------------------------------------------------+-------------

This total was equivalent to 4.15% on the net capitalization

of the roads represented. The rental paid the lessor roads

constituted the fund from which those roads paid their interest and

dividends. Further remark on the misleading and harmful statement

of the Official Statistician as to dividends declared in 1908 is

unnecessary.

V

COST OF CONSTRUCTION

Incomplete as are the figures of the cost of the railways of the

United States, and exclusive as they are of the millions put back

into the properties out of income for additions, betterments and

reconstruction in the process of operation, yet the statistics of the

cost of construction and equipment afford a complete answer to all

charges that American railways are over-capitalized.

Upon the question of the cost of road and equipment in 1909, the

returns of the 368 roads reporting to this Bureau furnish the

following data:

SUMMARY OF COST OF ROAD AND EQUIPMENT COVERING 221,132 MILES OF

OPERATED LINE FOR 1909.

=====================================================+================

Item | Amount

-----------------------------------------------------+----------------

Cost of road (182,046 miles owned) | $6,603,504,463

Cost of equipment | 1,122,409,813

Undistributed cost of road and equipment | 3,080,064,960

Cost of 39,086 miles leased lines rental capitalized | 2,415,699,876

+----------------

Total | $13,220,678,876

-----------------------------------------------------+----------------

Adding to this $290,750,000 to represent the 11,870 miles of road not

reporting to this Bureau at $25,000 per mile, we obtain

=$13,417,438,876=

as the cost of road and equipment of the 233,002 miles of line

employed in the transportation industry of the United States in 1909,

or

=$58,031 per mile of line.=

This is an underestimate by reason of the failure of a few lines

to furnish even approximate figures on the accumulated cost of

their properties. Averaging the cost of locomotives at $15,000,

of passenger cars at $6,000, of freight cars at $800, and of

company's cars at $500 apiece--their present cost rates much

higher--the equipment of American railways represents an investment

of over $3,000,000,000, and its bare maintenance alone involves an

expenditure of nearly $400,000,000 annually.

PHYSICAL VALUATION OF THE RAILWAYS.

It is worthy of passing note that just as the railway companies have

shown their indifference to a physical valuation of their property,

the clamor of regulators and agitators in its favor has subsided.

The proposal lost its attractiveness to them the moment they became

convinced that such an investigation would put a valuation on the

roads so high as to take not only the wind out of their sails but the

last drop of water out of their mouths. To-day the only insistent

demand for this futile undertaking comes from quarters interested in

the distribution of the appropriation of several millions it would

cost.

Credit for the reversal in the popular and political attitude on this

subject is largely due to the valuations attempted by the states of

Minnesota, Washington and Wisconsin. The results in these states may

be briefly summarized as follows:

===============================+========+==============+===============

| Miles |Capitalization| Valuation by

| of Line| per Mile |State, per Mile

-------------------------------+--------+--------------+---------------

Minnesota, 1907 | 7,596 | $44,206 | $54,201

| | |

Washington, 1908: | | |

Great Northern | 806 | 44,078 | 73,900

Northern Pacific | 942 | 70,278 | 106,500

Oregon R. R. & Navigation Co | 501 | 43,012 | 38,900

| | |

Wisconsin, 1906 | 7,135 | 33,424 | 34,630

-------------------------------+--------+--------------+---------------

Even Senator Albert B. Cummins of Iowa has seen such a bright light

on this subject that in his speech before the Traffic Club of Chicago

last February he said that he would not be willing to make a present

valuation of railroad property a basis for determining rates,

"for the reason that it was more than probable that the present

capitalization of between fifteen and sixteen billions would be

increased to twenty billions."

In the Bureau's Statistics for 1908 it was said:

"If the valuations in Minnesota and Washington, made by none too

friendly commissions, are any criterions of what a national valuation

made under presumably unbiased federal authority would be, the

present cost to reproduce the railways of the United States would be

nearer $20,000,000,000 than any sum within the anticipations of those

agitating for such valuation."

CAPITALIZATION OF FOREIGN RAILWAYS.

With both sides of the balance sheet testifying to a capital

investment in American railways of under $60,000, and official

valuation abandoned _because it would demonstrate that they could not

be reproduced for less than $80,000 per mile_, the reader is asked

to compare the American figures with those of the capitalization, or

cost of construction, of the principal foreign countries set forth

below. These have been compiled from the latest available official

returns.

SUMMARY OF RAILWAY CAPITALIZATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FOREIGN RAILWAYS

FROM LATEST DATA.

======+===========================+==========+=================+=========

Year | Country | Miles of | Capital or Cost | Per

| | Line | of Construction | Mile

------+---------------------------+----------+-----------------+---------

|Europe: | | |

1908 | United Kingdom | 23,205 | $6,382,296,742 | $275,040

1908 | Germany | 35,558 | 3,903,848,400 | 109,788

1907 | Russia in Europe (excl- | | |

| usive of Finland) | 32,900 |(a)3,170,876,360 | 80,985

1907 | France |(b)24,730 | 3,447,366,000 | 139,390

1907 | Austria | 13,427 | 1,515,576,885 | 112,879

1907 | Hungary | 11,769 | 741,586,391 | 63,010

1907-8| Italy (State roads only) | 8,699 | 1,086,000,000 | 124,730

1905 | Spain (13 roads) | 6,840 | 583,632,000 | 85,327

1906 | Sweden | 7,938 | 257,408,450 | 32,427

1907 | Belgium (State only) | 2,537 | 430,800,000 | 169,806

1907 | Switzerland | 2,740 | 298,709,210 | 109,000

| | | |

|Other Countries: | | |

1909 | Canada | 24,104 | 1,608,990,656 | 66,752

1908 | British India | 30,576 | 1,364,669,375 | 44,632

1907 | Argentine Republic | 13,690 | 820,433,796 | 59,930

1908 | Japan | 4,444 | 190,173,728 | 42,800

1909 | United States of America | 233,002 | 13,508,711,173 | 57,976

------+---------------------------+----------+-----------------+---------

(a) Russian capitalization, including railways in Asia, covers a total

of 39,277 miles, from which the capital per mile is computed.

(b) This is exclusive of 4,259 miles of local interest.

The most striking feature in this table is the steady advance it

shows in the capital cost of German railways. In ten years this has

increased from 251,597 marks per kilometer in 1898 to 283,608 in

1908, _i. e._ 31,731 marks per kilometer or $12,282 per mile. This

means an increase of $991,687,440 in capital cost for an increase of

only 5,525 miles of line.

VI

OWNERSHIP OF AMERICAN RAILWAYS

Returns to this Bureau place the number of stockholders of record at

the date of the last election of directors prior to June 30, 1909, of

the 368 roads reporting at 320,696. As only 182,046 of the 221,132

miles operated by these roads was covered by the capital stock, this

would show 1¾ stockholders for each mile of road and would indicate

that there are at least 415,000 stockholders in all the railways of

the United States. Owing to the incompleteness of the returns on this

subject and the fact that large blocks of stock are held in the names

of associations and trustees, it is safe to estimate that the actual

ownership of railway stock is distributed among at least 440,000

persons.

In 1905 the Commission reported the number of stockholders of record

prior to June 30, 1904, as 327,851, but has given no later figures.

It may be of interest to compare these figures with the partial

reports to this Bureau since then.

===================+=================+==============

Year | Number | Number of

| Reporting | Stockholders

-------------------+-----------------+--------------

1904 | 1,182 roads | 327,851

1906 | 284 " | 226,986

1907 | 317 " | 240,554

1908 | 315 " | 315,727

1909 | 340 " | 320,696

-------------------+-----------------+--------------

If the ownership of railway bonds, which is even more widely

distributed than that of stocks, could be traced, it would be found

that over a million investors are interested in the financial welfare

of the railways. This would give to each an interest of $13,000, from

which the average income is not over $520 a year.

The attempt of the Commission in 1908 to secure evidence that the

control of the railways was concentrated in a few hands by calling

for a statement of the "ten largest holders of voting securities"

of the reporting companies having established that nowhere did they

_own_ a majority or an approach to a majority of the controlling

stock, inquiry along that line was dropped in 1909.

In railways, as in any republic, the latent power is widely

distributed among the many, while the administrative responsibility

is necessarily entrusted to the few.

VII

PUBLIC SERVICE OF THE RAILWAYS

It is the reproach of our system of government statistics of railways

that their first concern is financial results, which the government

takes no thought to improve, and the harrowing roll of accidents, and

not the adequacy of the service and the steady development of the

means of transportation. Every month, almost every week, the public

is informed of the volume of traffic, and every quarter the record of

casualties is told in sensational head lines. It is left for belated

annual reports to record the public service of this great industry

upon whose progressive efficiency every other industry in the United

States depends.

It is not upon what the railways earn, but upon what they DO that the

whole industrial fabric of the republic rests. It is not upon the

dividends they pay but upon the traffic they carry, the net income

withheld from dividends and put into improvements, that their success

as carriers depends.

THE PASSENGER TRAFFIC.

In considering the public service of the railways it is customary to

give first attention to the passenger traffic. This is not because it

is the most important branch of the service but because passengers

are numbered by millions, where thousands suffice in the enumeration

of the shippers, who frequently mistake themselves for the entire

American people.

In twenty years between June 1, 1889, and June 1, 1909, the

population of the United States increased from 61,289,000 to

88,806,000, or nearly 45%. In the meantime the passenger cars

provided by the railways increased from 24,586 to 46,026, or over

87%. But this does not measure the liberal provision made by the

railway for the travelling public, which is more fully and accurately

expressed by the amazing growth of the number of passengers carried

one mile from 11,553,820,445 in 1889 to approximately 29,452,000,000

in 1909, or nearly 155%.

Here is shown an increase of cars not far short of double the

increase in population and an increase in passengers carried

proportionately greater than the numerical increase in cars.

In the meantime the average receipts of the traffic have declined

from 2.165 cents per passenger mile in 1889 to 1.916 in 1909--a

decline of over 11%, although every item involved in the service,

locomotives, cars, track, stations, labor, etc., cost more. The

passenger service, except as precursor to the freight service, and in

certain densely populated sections, was unremunerative in 1889 and is

more so now. It is maintained at the expense of the freight service

by what the Railroad Commission of Wisconsin has characterized as "a

species of piracy practiced upon the shippers of freight."

The salient features of the passenger service reported to this Bureau

for the year 1909, as compared with the final official returns for

the preceding year, are shown in the following statement:

======================================+================+================

Item | Bureau Figures |Official Figures

| 1909 | 1908

--------------------------------------+----------------+----------------

Miles of line represented | 221,132 | 230,494

Passengers carried. | 854,255,337 | 890,009,574

Passengers carried 1 mile | 28,788,855,000 | 29,082,836,944

Passenger revenue | $551,634,278 | $566,832,746

Mileage of passenger trains | 491,903,107 | 505,945,582

Average number of passengers in train | 58 | 54

Average cars to a train | 5.3 |

Passenger car miles | 2,594,508,987 | 2,705,659,994

Average passenger journey (miles) | 33.71 | 32.66

Average receipts per passenger mile | |

(cents) | 1.916 | 1.937

--------------------------------------+----------------+----------------

According to the monthly reports to the Interstate Commerce

Commission covering an average of 233,002 miles of line, the

passenger revenues in 1909 were $564,302,580, or $1,943,077 less than

the above revenues for only 228,164 miles of line in 1908.

The average receipts per passenger mile in 1909 are the lowest ever

reported for American railways.

Taken in connection with the official returns covering the period

since 1900, the above figures afford evidence of the confiscatory

effect of the 2-cent passenger laws on railway revenues, as appears

from the following statement:

SUMMARY OF PASSENGER MILEAGE, REVENUE AND RECEIPTS PER PASSENGER

MILE, 1900 TO 1909.

============+================+===========+==============+==========

| | Increase | |

| Passengers | Over | | Receipts

Year | Carried | Preceding | Passenger | per

| One Mile | Year | Revenue | Passenger

| |(Per Cent) | | Mile

------------+----------------+-----------+--------------+----------

1900 | 16,038,076,200 | | $323,715,639 | 2.003

1901 | 17,353,588,444 | 8.2 | 351,356,265 | 2.013

1902 | 19,689,937,620 | 13.4 | 392,963,248 | 1.986

1903 | 20,915,763,881 | 6.2 | 421,704,592 | 2.006

1904 | 21,923,213,536 | 4.8 | 444,326,991 | 2.006

1905 | 23,800,149,436 | 8.6 | 472,694,732 | 1.962

1906 | 25,167,240,831 | 5.7 | 510,032,583 | 2.003

1907 | 27,718,554,030 | 10.1 | 564,606,343 | 2.014

1908 | 29,082,836,944 | 4.9 | 566,245,657 | 1.937

1909 | 29,452,000,000 | 1.3 | 564,302,580 | 1.916

| | | |

Increase, | | | |

per cent | 83.7 | -- | 74.6 | --

------------+----------------+-----------+--------------+----------

Here it is shown that the passenger service rendered has increased

12% more than the passenger revenues. But more significant than

this is the column of yearly increases in service by percentages.

This utterly explodes the theory that passenger travel is greatly

stimulated by low fares--aside from some positive incentive to

increased travel, such as periodical expositions, the Louisiana

Purchase Exposition for instance, the effect of which is clearly

traceable in the increased service in 1905, which includes the heavy

travel during the months of heavy attendance, July 1 to December 1,

1904.

The 2-cent passenger laws were passed so as to become generally

effective July 1, 1907, and their effect on passenger receipts during

the following year was such that these receipts were actually less in

1909 than in 1907, although the service performed by the railways was

over 6% greater. Had the railways received the same rate in 1909 that

they did in 1907 their revenue from passengers would have been nearly

$29,000,000 more than it was.

PASSENGER TRAFFIC 1909-1888.

In the next statement the salient facts in regard to the passenger

traffic since the Commission began collecting the data is passed

under review.

======+==========+==========+=======+========+=======+=======+========

| | | | | | |Average

|Passengers|Passengers|Mileage|Average |Average|Pass. |Receipts

Year | Carried | Carried | Pass. | Pass. |Journey|Revenue| per

|(Millions)| One Mile | Trains|in Train| Miles |(Mill.)|Pass.

| |(Millions)|(Mill.)| | | |Mile

| | | | | | |(Cents)

------+----------+----------+-------+--------+-------+-------+-------

1909 | 888 | 29,452 | 507 | 58 | 33 | 504 | 1.916

1908 | 890 | 29,082 | 500 | 59 | 33 | 566 | 1.937

1907 | 873 | 27,718 | 509 | 51 | 32 | 564 | 2.014

1906 | 797 | 25,167 | 479 | 49 | 31 | 510 | 2.003

1905 | 738 | 23,800 | 459 | 48 | 32 | 472 | 1.962

1904 | 715 | 21,923 | 440 | 46 | 31 | 444 | 2.006

1903 | 694 | 20,915 | 425 | 46 | 30 | 421 | 2.006

1902 | 649 | 19,689 | 405 | 45 | 30 | 392 | 1.986

1901 | 607 | 17,353 | 385 | 42 | 29 | 351 | 2.013

1900 | 576 | 16,038 | 363 | 41 | 28 | 323 | 2.003

1899 | 523 | 14,591 | 347 | 41 | 28 | 291 | 1.978

1898 | 501 | 13,379 | 334 | 39 | 27 | 267 | 1.973

1897 | 489 | 12,256 | 335 | 37 | 25 | 251 | 2.022

1896 | 511 | 13,049 | 332 | 39 | 26 | 266 | 2.019

1895 | 507 | 12,188 | 317 | 38 | 24 | 252 | 2.040

1894 | 540 | 14,289 | 326 | 44 | 26 | 285 | 1.986

1893 | 593 | 14,229 | 335 | 42 | 24 | 301 | 2.108

1892 | 560 | 13,362 | 317 | 42 | 24 | 286 | 2.126

1891 | 531 | 12,844 | 308 | 42 | 24 | 281 | 2.142

1890 | 492 | 11,847 | 285 | 41 | 24 | 260 | 2.167

1889 | 472 | 11,553 | 277 | 42 | 25 | 254 | 2.199

1888 | 412 | 10,101 | 252 | 40 | 24 | 237 | 2.349

------+----------+----------+-------+--------+-------+-------+-------

Increase 1888 to | | | | | |

1907 115% | 191% | 101% | 45% | 38% | 138% |

Decrease | | | | | | 18.4

------+----------+----------+-------+--------+-------+-------+-------

The several increases shown in the first, second, third and sixth

columns of the table reflect the general advancement in passenger

traffic. That of 45% in the average passengers to a train marks the

progress in density of that traffic which may eventually place it

on a profitable basis. In Massachusetts, where this density yields

an average of 79 passengers to a train there is no demand for a

two-cent rate statute, for the conditions have made a rate of 1.64

cents profitable. In the group of states consisting of Ohio, Indiana,

Michigan, Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota, where the density

of traffic yields only 46 passengers by train, a statutory two-cent

fare becomes confiscatory because it costs at least one dollar to

operate a passenger train one mile and 46 times two cents is only

92 cents. Moreover the 46 passengers per train is only an average

and there are as many trains that average less as more. The average

has to be raised above 50 to yield any margin of profit on passenger

traffic. If it were not for the density of traffic in the New England

and North Atlantic group of states the average for the entire United

States would be well below 46 passengers per train.

The steady increase in the distance traveled per passenger reflects

the effect of trolley competition in diverting the short haul

passenger traffic.

The most noteworthy feature of the seventh column is the decline

of 98/1000ths of a cent in the average receipts per passenger mile

between 1907 and 1909, making a new low record after hovering around

the two cent mark for fourteen years. As noted above, this reduction

in the average cost the railways nearly $29,000,000 on the passenger

traffic of 1909.

In this connection it is interesting to recall that between 1888 and

1893 the Official Statistician, then as now Professor Adams, made the

following computation of the average cost of carrying one passenger

one mile for the whole United States:

============================+======+======+======+======+======+======

| 1888 | 1889 | 1890 | 1891 | 1892 | 1893

----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------

Average cost of carrying a | | | | | |

passenger one mile, cents | 2.042| 1.993| 1.917| 1.910| 1.939| 1.955

----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+------

It will be observed that the average receipts per passenger mile in

1909 are below the computed cost in every one of the years above

named, except 1891. When the advance in the cost of everything

necessary to the service--track, labor, equipment, conveniences,

speed, terminal facilities--is considered, the practical coincidence

of average cost and receipts leaves no margin for legitimate profits.

RECEIPTS FROM MAIL AND EXPRESS.

Closely associated with the passenger traffic of the railways are

the mail and express services. Although principally carried by

passenger trains, each has a special service of its own by mail and

express trains. But all are included under the passenger service.

The receipts from these two branches of the service during the last

decade are shown in the following statement:

SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS FROM MAIL AND EXPRESS, 1899 TO 1908.

====================+=====================+=====================

| Mail | Express

+------------+--------+---------------------

Year | Revenues |Percent-| Revenues |Percent-

| | age of | |age of

| |Earnings| |Earnings

--------------------+------------+--------+------------+--------

1899 |$35,999,011 | 2.74 |$26,756,054 | 2.04

1900 | 37,752,474 | 2.54 | 28,416,150 | 1.91

1901 | 38,453,602 | 2.42 | 31,121,613 | 1.96

1902 | 39,963,248 | 2.31 | 34,253,459 | 2.07

1903 | 41,709,396 | 2.19 | 38,331,964 | 1.98

1904 | 44,499,732 | 2.25 | 41,875,636 | 2.12

1905 | 45,426,125 | 2.18 | 45,149,155 | 2.17

1906 | 47,371,453 | 2.04 | 51,010,930 | 2.19

1907 | 50,378,964 | 1.94 | 57,332,931 | 2.21

1908 | 48,517,563 | 2.03 | 58,602,091 | 2.45

1909 | 50,935,000 | 2.08 | 63,669,000 | 2.60

| | | |

Increase, per cent | 41.5 | -- | 138.0 | --

--------------------+------------+--------+------------+--------

Aside from the striking contrast in the percentages of increase of

revenues from these two sources, the most significant feature of this

table is the reversal it shows in their respective importance from

the railway revenue point of view. Prior to 1905, carrying the mails

brought larger, if not more profitable, returns to the railways.

Since then the returns from express have increased so much more

rapidly that they are now nearly 23% more than those from mails.

If proof were needed of the absolute falsity of the charge that the

railways are receiving an exorbitant rate for carrying mail, the

above table of their receipts from the service in connection with

the following statement of mail handled and revenues in view of the

finding of the Joint Commission of Congress in 1899 would furnish it.

After a thorough investigation of the subject lasting from August,

1898, to July, 1900, the Commission came to the following conclusion:

"Upon a careful consideration of all the evidence and the statements

and arguments submitted, and in view of all the services rendered

by the railroads, we are of the opinion that the prices now paid to

the railroad companies for the transportation of the mails are not

excessive, and recommend that no reduction thereof be made at this

time."

The increase in the railroad service since this report was made is

shown in the following statement of miles of mail transportation

by railroads, the postal revenues and the number of clerks in the

railway mail service since 1899:

The Railway Library, 1909 A Collection of Noteworthy Chapters, Addresses, and Papers Relating to Railways, Mostly Published During the Year · 第 33 / 39 段