SOME CURIOUS COINCIDENCES.

It has often been jocularly said that no family can have any right to

call itself 'old' unless it has its 'family ghost.' As regards the

Highlands of Scotland, we may substitute for the ghost the inevitable

'doom,' or prediction foretelling future weal or woe to the family.

Almost every old Highland house has its 'prophecy' of this kind, such

as the Argyll and Breadalbane predictions, the 'Fate of Seaforth,' the

'Fall and Rise of Macleod,' and many others well known in the north.

The great majority of the families so gifted have had of course no

events in their history that even the credulity of their retainers in

the past could twist into a fulfilment of the predictions; but in a

few cases there have been some curious coincidences between the old

traditions and the facts of a later time.

We propose to select one or two well authenticated instances of such

coincidences from among a mass of Highland superstition in a little

book that has recently been published at Inverness entitled _The

Prophecies of the Brahan Seer_, by Alexander Mackenzie (Inverness:

A. and W. Mackenzie). This pamphlet is a collection of most of the

traditionary 'prophecies' attributed to an apocryphal Ross-shire seer

of the seventeenth century, and which have been handed down by oral

tradition from generation to generation in the Highlands since that

time. In the north, the popular faith in this prophet _Coinneach Odhar_

or 'Dun Kenneth' and his predictions has been and is both strong and

wide, says Mr Mackenzie, who thinks the legends worthy of preservation,

as an additional chapter 'both remarkable and curious, to the already

extensive history of the marvellous.' At anyrate, these legends are of

some interest as illustrations of the superstition and credulity of

the Highlanders of the last century, and perhaps even of this; but our

purpose leaves untouched the wilder traditions in this collection, and

deals only with two episodes in the histories of two great families of

the north.

Sir Edmund Burke in his _Vicissitudes of Families_ has a weird chapter

on 'the Fate of Seaforth,' in which he gives at full length the doom of

this family, as pronounced by the 'Warlock of the Glen' (as Sir Edmund

calls Dun Kenneth), and its fulfilment a century and a half after it

was spoken. Burke seemingly accepts as fact (as does Mr Mackenzie)

the purely mythical story of the seer and his cruel fate--how, being

a clansman of Seaforth, and famed for his prophetic skill, he was

called on by his chief's wife to explain why her husband staid so long

in Paris, whither he had gone on business soon after the Restoration;

how the Warlock, unwilling at first to tell what his uncanny gift

shewed him, at last was forced to say that the Lord of Kintail was

forgetting home and Lady Isabel in the smiles of a French lady; how

the angry countess, furious that he should have so slandered his chief

before his clansmen, ordered the seer to be burned to death--another

instance of the proverbial 'honour' in which prophets are held in their

own country. As he was dying at the stake, Kenneth uttered a weird

prediction foretelling the downfall of the Seaforths for Lady Isabel's

crime. So runs the legend. It is quite certain that a prediction

regarding the Seaforth family was well known in the Highlands long

before the days of the last chief of Kintail. We have Lockhart's

authority for the fact that both Sir Humphry Davy and Sir Walter Scott

knew and believed it. 'I do fear the accomplishment of the prophecy,'

writes Scott in another place to his friend Morritt of Rokeby, who

himself testifies that he heard it quoted in the Highlands at a time

when Lord Seaforth had two sons both alive and in good health. This

prediction ran, that the house of Seaforth would fall when there should

be a deaf and dumb earl who should sell Kintail (the 'gift-land' of his

house); that this earl would have three sons, all of whom he should

survive; that four great Highland lairds, his contemporaries, should

each have certain physical defects, which were named; that the Seaforth

estates should go to 'a white-hooded lassie from the East,' who should

be the cause of her sister's death.

With all these particulars the facts coincided exactly. Francis

Humberstone Mackenzie, the last Seaforth, became deaf from an attack of

fever while at school, and latterly also became dumb. His remarkable

life is well known: he raised from his clan the 78th Highlanders, and

subsequently rose to be a lieutenant-general in the army and governor

of various colonies. Scott, whose great friend he was, says he was a

man 'of extraordinary talents, who must have made for himself a lasting

reputation, had not his political exertions been checked by painful

natural infirmity.' He was the happy father of three sons and six

daughters, all of high promise; but the end of his life was darkened

by misfortunes. Two of his sons died suddenly; and in 1814, William,

his last hope--M. P. for his native county, and a young man of great

abilities--sickened of a lingering disease, and died about the time

that losses in the West Indies necessitated the sale of Kintail. In

January following, the old man, broken-hearted at the loss of his three

sons, died; and then, as Scott says:

Of the line of Mackenneth remained not a male

To bear the proud name of the chiefs of Kintail.

The estates went to his eldest daughter, the widow of Admiral Sir

Samuel Hood, who was on her way home from India when her father

died. The four Highland lairds, friends of Earl Francis, were all

distinguished by the peculiar personal marks which were mentioned in

the prediction; and to make the coincidence complete, Lady Hood--then

Mrs Stewart Mackenzie--many years afterwards may be said to have been

the innocent cause of her sister's death, for when she was driving Miss

Caroline Mackenzie in a pony-carriage, the ponies ran away, the ladies

were thrown out, and Miss Mackenzie killed!

So much for this strange chapter in family history. Let us now

glance at the records of another family--equally famous in the

Highlands--where the prediction, as a whole, has not been fulfilled,

though enough has happened here also to make the coincidence very

striking. Our authority in this case is the Rev. Norman Macleod, father

of the late Dr Norman Macleod. In the appendix to Dr Norman's _Life_

by his brother are given a series of reminiscences dictated in his old

age by their father. He says that in the summer of 1799 he visited

Dunvegan Castle in Skye, the old stronghold of the Macleods. 'One

circumstance took place at the castle on this occasion which I think

worth recording, especially as I am the only person now living who

can attest the truth of it. There had been a traditionary prophecy,

couched in Gaelic verse, regarding the family of Macleod, which on this

occasion received a most extraordinary fulfilment. This prophecy I

have heard repeated by several persons.... It was prophesied at least

a hundred years prior to the circumstance I am about to relate.' This

prediction shortly was, that when 'Norman, the third Norman,' should

meet an accidental death; when the rocks on the coast of Macleod's

country called the 'Maidens' became the property of a Campbell; when a

fox had young ones in the castle; and when the 'Fairy Banner' should be

for the last time shewn--the glory of Macleod should depart for a time;

the estates be sold to others. But that again in the far future another

Macleod should redeem the property and raise the family higher than

ever. Now comes the curious coincidence told by Mr Macleod.

An English smith at Dunvegan told him one day that next morning he was

going to the castle to force open the iron chest in which the 'fairy

flag' of the Macleods had lain for ages undisturbed. Mr Macleod was

very anxious to be present, and at last he got permission from 'the

factor,' upon condition that he told no one of the name of Macleod--the

chief included--what was to be done. The smith tore off the lid of the

box, and the famous old flag was exposed--'a square piece of very rich

silk, with crosses wrought with gold-thread, and several elf-spots

stitched with great care on different parts of it.' Very soon after

this, Mr Macleod goes on to say, 'the melancholy news of the death of

the young and promising heir of Macleod reached the castle. "Norman,

the third Norman," was a lieutenant of H.M.S. the _Queen Charlotte_,

which was blown up at sea, and he and the rest perished. At the same

time, the rocks called "Macleod's Maidens" were sold in the course

of that very week to Angus Campbell of Ensay; and they are still in

possession of his grandson. A fox in possession of a Lieutenant Maclean

residing in the west turret of the castle, had young ones, which I

handled. And thus all that was said in the prophecy alluded to was

so far fulfilled; although I am glad the family of my chief still

enjoy their ancestral possessions, and the worst part of the prophecy

accordingly remains unverified. I merely state the facts of the case as

they occurred, without expressing any opinion whatever as to the nature

of these traditionary legends with which they were connected.'

A coincidence as remarkable as any of these is the one Mr Wilkie

Collins notices in connection with his novel _Armadale_. Readers of

that powerful story will recollect what an important part the fatal

effects of sleeping in poisoned and foul air play in it. They, writes

Mr Wilkie Collins, 'may be interested in hearing of a coincidence

relating to the present story which actually happened, and which in the

matter of "extravagant improbability" sets anything of the same kind

that a novelist could imagine at flat defiance. In November 1865--that

is to say, when thirteen monthly parts of _Armadale_ had been

published, and I may add, when more than a year and a half had elapsed

since the end of the story, as it now appears, was first sketched in

my note-book--a vessel lay in the Huskisson Dock at Liverpool, which

was looked after by one man, who slept on board, in the capacity of

ship-keeper. On a certain day in the week this man was found dead in

the deck-house. On the next day a second man, who had taken his place,

was carried dying to the Northern Hospital. On the third day a third

ship-keeper was appointed, and was found dead in the deck-house, which

had already proved fatal to the other two. _The name of that ship was

the Armadale._ And the proceedings at the inquest proved that the three

men had all been suffocated by _sleeping in poisoned air_.' The case,

Mr Collins goes on to say, 'was noticed--to give two instances in which

I can cite the dates--in the _Times_ of November 30, 1865, and was more

fully described in the _Daily News_ of November 28, in the same year.'

Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 711, August 11, 1877 · 第 16 / 17 题