VI

I went back to town by an express that had just come in. At Rugby the

bookstalls were open and I bought half-a-dozen morning papers, of all

kinds and sizes from twenty-four-page Diehard Conservative to the daily

pennyworth of revolution. I don't think I realized the full significance

of what June had told me till I had thoroughly digested at least a score

of their closely printed columns. First of all I read Karelsky's speech

verbatim in _The Times_. It was just what I expected--noisy, blatant,

self-assertive, full of impertinent jibes at other investigators, and

enlivened by quips that would have done credit to a Hyde Park orator.

The whole thing gave me the impression of being addressed to the man in

the street rather than to the Conference members; there was hardly a

sentence that the layman could not _think_ he understood. Theories which

most men would have advanced cautiously and modestly, Karelsky hammered

out with a sort of slanging, impudent dogmatism; there never could have

been, I think, such language spoken to a scientific assembly before.

In a long leading article _The Times_ struck a note of cautious

approval. "The fact that Herr Karelsky's methods of obtaining publicity

savour rather of the market-place than the laboratory, should not blind

us to the possibility--nay, even the probability--that he has made a

noteworthy contribution to the alleviation of human distress.... It

would seem that, if the cases he cites are authentic, he has indeed made

an important discovery.... Investigators in all countries will not be

slow in examining carefully all the details, many of which, in his

desire to tickle the ears of the groundlings, Herr Karelsky has

doubtless withheld...."

All the other papers had leading articles, but the tone of them varied

from straightforward approval to positively ecstatic adulation. It was

sickening to wade through some of the pages, especially those

of the picture papers, in which Karelsky's face, fat and smiling,

stared out from amidst a journalistic rake-up of all his earlier

stunts--rejuvenation, Thibetan monasteries, and the rest. "Hats Off To

Karelsky!" shouted the _Daily Wire_ rampantly, and even went so far as

to praise Karelsky for "talking to the public in words that the public

can understand." The _Messenger's_ stuff was evidently the work of old

'Pot' Higgins, for it quoted Tennyson, Goethe, Peter the Great, and

(incorrectly) Disraeli.... And to think that it was Saturday, and that

the scribes of the Sunday papers were already at work! Oh, my God....

Perhaps it is rather silly to have written that. But I am feeling now,

as I write it, what I felt during that journey from Rugby to Euston--not

so much hatred of Karelsky for being a mean thief, but disgust at the

way everybody was taken in by him. Perhaps I am prejudiced. Perhaps I am

bound to be. And, anyhow, it doesn't matter....

I reached London in time for a very late breakfast, and in the early

afternoon I went up to Hampstead to see Severn.

Terry · 第 91 / 125 题