And he answered: "I'm not going--at all."

I think I was dazed at first. Then I was angry that he hadn't told me

before, and then, for a fraction of a second, I was selfishly glad that

our friendship had been reprieved. After that bewilderment came again,

and finally I was calm but immensely puzzled. I asked him if he meant

that the whole arrangement with Karelsky was cancelled, and he said:

"Yes--that's right."

"But--but _why_?"

"Because I--I can't go."

"_Why_ can't you?"

"I--I just _can't_, that's all."

"But there _must_ be a reason!"

"There _is_ a reason."

"What?"

"Well ... to begin with ... it was never absolutely settled that I

_should_ go."

"But you told Severn to-night that you were going."

"Yes ... I thought I _was_ going then."

"And you've changed your mind since?"

"Yes ... I suppose I have."

"But--_why_?"

"Well, I've a right to change my mind, haven't I?"

"Of course, but ..."

And so on.... For a long time I could get nothing at all out of him

except that he had changed his mind and wasn't going. The cleverest

subtleties of cross-examination were wasted on him; whenever I thought I

had manœuvred him into a corner, he just shook his head and said: "I

don't know what there is to argue about. Severn told me I must please

myself.... I'm pleasing myself, that's all." Then, as a last and not too

scrupulous resort, I tried a method that had sometimes succeeded before;

it consisting in pretending to infer from his silences something that I

knew he wouldn't like me to infer. I said: "Well, I daresay you have

good reasons, whatever they are. Karelsky seems rather a keen business

man, and if the terms he offers aren't high enough----"

"Karelsky," he sharply interrupted, "had nothing to do with it."

"Whether he had or not, you haven't any money of your own, and you

obviously can't afford to----"

I guessed that would stir him. He protested with sudden indignation: "I

tell you it isn't a matter of money at all. Good heavens! do you think

I'd let a question of money interfere with--with anything I had thought

of doing?"

"What _would_ you let interfere, then?"

He shook his head. "It's just.... Oh, I can't go--I keep on telling you

I can't go.... That's all."

"It isn't me you ought to be telling. It's Severn. He doesn't know yet,

does he?"

"Not yet."

"Don't you think he'll be rather disappointed?"

"Perhaps. I'm sorry about that.... But all the same, I can't help it.

It's nothing to do with him--the reason, I mean.... I can't help it--I

shall tell him I can't help it!"

So the reason had nothing to do with Severn, and nothing to do with

Karelsky. Then who _was_ the person involved?

Terry · 第 25 / 125 题