JAN. 19.]

William Head and John Fergusson, who had ‘practised a lottery by

authority in the kingdom of England,’ were authorised by the Privy

Council to set up a similar adventure in any part of Scotland they

pleased, ‘without let or molestation, they behaving themselves as

becometh.’--_P. C. R._

* * * * *

[Sidenote: MAR. 2.]

During the early years of the reign of Charles II., a custom prevailed

to a great extent of obtaining from the Privy Council protections

against the diligence of creditors. Sometimes a Highland chief could

not come to Edinburgh on important affairs of his own, without this

safeguard; sometimes the Council could not otherwise be favoured

with the company of some man of local influence, whom it desired to

see upon important public business. Sir Mungo Murray was unable to

attend the funeral of his cousin and namesake, ‘late lieutenant of

one of his majesty’s troops of guards,’ unless he got ‘protection

against the rigidity of his creditors.’ At this date, the Council

received an application for a protection from James Arnot, postmaster

at Cockburnspath, an important station on the road from Edinburgh to

Berwick. James having involved himself in debt, not only was his person

‘in hazard to be taken with captions, but the horses and furniture

reserved for the public use of the lieges upon the post-road are

threatened to be poindit.’ As the government owed him as much as would

pay his debts, it seemed but reasonable that they should save him from

his creditors, which they accordingly did by granting him and his

horses protection for a year.--_P. C. R._

[Sidenote: 1671.

Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 91 / 124 题