JUNE 21.]

This day, Heriot’s Hospital, which had been founded in 1628, being

now complete, was solemnly dedicated by the ceremony of a preaching

in presence of the magistrates of Edinburgh, the preacher, Mr Robert

Douglas, receiving five double pieces for his pains. There were placed

in it ‘thirty-five boys, of honest parents, but decayit in means, all

of them weel arrayit in purpour clothes and cassocks.’ ‘This hospital,’

says Nicoll, ‘was not ane ordinary hospital, but a hospital very

famous, with halls, chalmers, kitchens, brew-houses, yards, orchards, a

chapel, and all other necessaries.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: SEP. 1.]

The town of Edinburgh obtained an additional impost upon the ale sold

in its bounds; it was now a full penny sterling a pint, so that the

liquor rose to the unheard-of price of 32d. Scots for that quantity.

‘Yet this imposition,’ says Nicoll, ‘seemed not to thrive; for at

the same instant God frae the heavens declared his anger by sending

thunder, and unheard tempests, and storms, and inundations of water,

whilk destroyed their common mills, dams, and warks, to the town’s

great charges and expenses.’ Eleven mills belonging to Edinburgh, and

five belonging to Heriot’s Hospital, all upon the Water of Leith, were

destroyed on this occasion, ‘with their dams, water-gangs, timber and

stone-warks, the haill wheels of their mills, timber graith, and haill

other warks.’ The chronicler, somewhat awkwardly for his hypothesis,

admits that many neighbouring towns suffered by the like destruction of

their mills.

* * * * *

[Sidenote: SEP. 21.]

Nicoll states himself to have seen this day, a youth of sixteen, a

native of Aberdeen, who, having been born without power in his arms,

either to eat or drink, or do any other thing for himself or others,

‘Almighty God, who is able to do all things, gave him power to supply

all these duties with the toes of his feet, and to write in singular

good legible and current write, and that with such haste as any

common notar is in use to do. Yea, further, with his toes he put on

his clothes, kamed his head, made his writing pens, [and] threaded a

needle, in such short time and space as any other person whatsomever

was able to do with his hands.’

* * * * *

[Sidenote: 1659.]

In the Council Records of Inverness occurs, under this year, the

following petition: ‘To the Right Honourable the Magistrates and Town

Council of the burgh of Inverness, the supplication of Frederick

Fraser, tailor burgess of Inverness, and Alexander Duff, burgess there,

for ourselves and in behalf the remanent freemen of that trade, humbly

sheweth--That your supplicants are very much damnified and prejudged

in the enjoyment of their trade, the same being in-falled upon and

taken away by many outlandish men, who dwell round about the burgh for

eschewing of burden, and yet peeps in by night and by day and steals

away the trade of the place, and works the same in the landward, to

our great loss and apparent ruin, so that if speedy redress be not

found, and this evil to this poor trade be not stayed, your supplicants

and our poor families will undoubtedly perish. We are able to shew

your lordships, and to make it out, that in these times we gain not

by our trade for our own subsistence and the upholding of the burdens

of the place, that which our servants were wont to gain under us.

May it please your lordships, therefore, to take the premises into

consideration, and to allow us, your supplicants, or such others of the

trade as your lordships please to nominate, such power and freedom in

the exercise of that trade as formerly we had, and that for the better

restraining of all such as are neither profitable nor allowable to the

place, and for the further and better encouragement of us your poor

supplicants who has and are willing daily to contribute with the place

in weal and woe according to our poor power.’

A local journalist, after giving a transcript of this petition,

adds: ‘Provost Cuthbert and the council turned a friendly ear to the

supplication, and authorised the petitioners to “look and see to

restrain all outlandish tailors,” and empowering them to seize upon the

work of the transgressors, and bring the whole before a magistrate.

Two years afterwards, however, the same parties, with the addition

of John Cumming, tailor, again complain of the outlandish tailors.

They petition that all unfreemen in the town should be discharged

from usurping to themselves the benefits of freemen, and from keeping

apprentices and servants, and _made to live within the verge of their

own calling_. The provost and council granted the desire of the

petition, and authorised the supplicants, with the concurrence of the

burgh officers, to put the act in force. The principles of political

economy or free-trade were not then understood, but the inhabitants

seem to have been willing enough to avail themselves of the cheap

services of the outlandish tailors, else the freemen would not so

strongly have urged their claims upon the council.’[185]

Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 76 / 124 题