MAY.]

Stage-coaches were at this time advertised as to go from ‘the George

Inn without Aldersgate’ to sundry parts of England thrice a week; to

Leeds, Wakefield, and Halifax once a week, charge 40s.; to Durham and

Newcastle, once a week, charge £3; and ‘to _Edinburgh in Scotland_,

once in three weeks, for £4, 10s.’--in all cases, ‘with good coaches

and fresh horses on the roads.’[178]

* * * * *

During this year, the people of Edinburgh, Glasgow, and other

considerable towns, were amused in succession with the performances of

a horse brought from England, ‘wha, being trained up in dancing and

other conceits of that kind, did afford much sport and contentment to

the people, but not without gain, for none was admitted to see the

dancing without twopence the piece, and some more.’--_Nic._

* * * * *

[Sidenote: OCT. 1.]

A supplication was this day given in to the Town Council of Glasgow

by one Robert Marshall, shewing that he was willing, if permitted,

to exercise the calling of a house-painter in the city. The Council,

having had it represented to them that there was ‘but one the like

within this burgh, and not ane other in all the west of Scotland,’ gave

Robert permission to wash and paint houses to any who pleased to employ

him.--_M. of G._

[Sidenote: 1658.]

This gives a curious idea of Glasgow two centuries ago. The magistrates

had a little before this time induced a printer to come from Edinburgh

and settle amongst them. The man does not seem to have succeeded, for

in May 1660, they give him fifty merks, ‘to help to transport his guids

and flitting to Edinburgh again.’ A few months after this date, Robert

Sanders was encouraged to set up a printing-office in Glasgow, with a

pension of £40 a year, ‘he to print gratis anything that the town shall

employ him to print.’ In 1660, they caused a plasterer to be sent for

from Perth, ‘to come here for plastering of Hucheson’s Hospital.’--_M.

of G._

* * * * *

[Sidenote: NOV.]

The lamentations, of which we have seen several examples, over the

depressed condition of Scotland under the English tyranny, are

repeated at this time by a man of moderate and sagacious character,

the Rev. Robert Baillie. He says: ‘The country lies very quiet; it is

exceeding poor; trade is nought; the English has all the moneys. Our

noble families are almost gone: Lennox has little in Scotland unsold;

Hamilton’s estate, except Arran and the barony of Hamilton, is sold;

Argyle can pay little annual-rent [interest] for seven or eight hunched

thousand merks [of debt]; and he is no more drowned in debt than public

hatred, almost of all, both Scotch and English. The Gordons are gone;

the Douglases little better; Eglintoun and Glencairn on the brink of

breaking. Many of our chief families’ states are cracking; nor is there

any appearance of any human relief for the time.’[179] It may give some

idea of the reduced state of the nobility during these evil days, that

the allowance made by the English government out of the sequestered

estates of the Balcarres family for the earl, a minor, and his younger

brother, was only ten pounds a year![180]

Nicoll, adverting to the same time, says: ‘The condition of this nation

of Scotland yet remains sad, by reason of poverty and heavy burdens.’

The crop of the year ‘was very poor by reason of the spring-time, whilk

was very cold and weety the space of many weeks.’ The price of victual

was consequently for this year double what it had recently been.

[Sidenote: 1658.]

A Mr Tucker, who was commissioned by Cromwell in 1656 to introduce

order into the customs duties of Scotland, has left a report from which

we obtain particulars as to the trade then carried on with foreign

countries. Notwithstanding that duties were in those days imposed

equally on exported and imported goods, the revenue of Leith port was

only £2335; that of Aberdeen, £573; Glasgow, £554. The respective sums

drawn from these ports, for imports only, in 1844, were £631,926,

£76,259, and £551,841. Other ports were in proportion, though not

uniformly; thus Burntisland, which is now merely a ferry harbour, then

drew nearly as much revenue as Glasgow. The native shipping, consisting

of vessels of from twelve to a hundred and fifty tons, was in not

less marked contrast to that of our day. Glasgow had only twelve such

vessels; Kirkcaldy, an equal number, but not one above a hundred tons;

Dundee and Anstruther, ten; Burntisland, seven; Wemyss, six; Dysart,

four. The extreme narrowness of the resources of Scotland is strikingly

shewn in these facts, and makes us the more disposed to wonder at the

comparatively great sacrifices which the people had been making for

many years for the sake of their church and for its promotion in other

lands.

At the same time that so great poverty prevailed, there was such a

protection to life and property as had never before been known. It was

not, we believe, without cause that the famous Colonel Desborough, in

a speech in the House of Commons (March 17, 1659), made it a boast for

his party, that ‘a man may ride over all Scotland, with a switch in his

hand and a hundred pounds in his pocket, which he could not have done

these five hundred years.’[181]

* * * * *

[Sidenote: 1659.

Domestic Annals of Scotland from the Reformation to the Revolution, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 74 / 124 题