In the time of Henri IV. an Elector-Palatine came to France; the King’s

household was sent to meet him. All his expenses were paid, as well as

those of his suite; and when he arrived at the Court he entered between

the Dauphin and Monsieur and dined with the King. I learned these

particulars from the late Monsieur. The King, under the pretence of

going to the chase, went about a league from Paris, and, meeting the

Elector, conducted him in his carriage. At Paris he was always attended

by the King’s servants. This treatment is somewhat different from that

which, in my time, was bestowed upon Maximilian Maria, the Elector of

Bavaria. This Elector often enraged me with the foolish things that he

did. For example, he went to play and to dine with M. d’Antin, and never

evinced the least desire to dine with his own nephews. A sovereign,

whether he be Elector or not, might with propriety dine either at the

Dauphin’s table or mine; and, if the Elector had chosen, he might have

come to us; but he was contented to dine with M. d’Antin or M. de Torcy,

and some ladies of the King’s suite. I am angry to this day when I think

of it. The King used often to laugh at my anger on this subject; and,

whenever the Elector committed some new absurdity, he used to call to me

in the cabinet and ask me, “Well, Madame, what have you to say to that?”

I would reply, “All that the Elector does is alike ridiculous.” This

made the King laugh heartily. The Elector had a Marshal, the Count

d’Arco, the brother of that person who had married in so singular a

manner the Prince’s mistress, Popel, which marriage had been contracted

solely upon his promise never to be alone with his wife. The Marshal,

who was as honest as his brother was accommodating, was terribly annoyed

at his master’s conduct; he came at first to me to impart to me his

chagrin whenever the Elector committed some folly; and when he behaved

better he used also to tell me of it. I rather think he must have been

forbidden to visit me, for latterly I never saw him. None of the

Elector’s suite have visited me, and I presume they have been prevented.

This Prince’s amorous intrigues have been by no means agreeable to the

King. The Elector was so fond of grisettes that, when the King was

giving names to each of the roads through the wood, he was exceedingly

anxious that one of them should be called L’Allee des Grisettes; but the

King would not consent to it. The Elector has perpetuated his race in

the villages; and two country girls have been pointed out to me who were

pregnant by him at his departure.

His marriage with a Polish Princess is a striking proof that a man cannot

avoid his fate. This was not a suitable match for him, and was managed

almost without his knowledge, as I have been told. His Councillors,

having been bought over, patched up the affair; and when the Elector only

caused it to be submitted for their deliberation, it was already decided

on.

This Elector’s brother must have been made a Bishop of Cologne and

Munster without the production of proof of his nobility being demanded;

for it is well known that the King Sobieski was a Polish nobleman, who

married the daughter of Darquin, Captain of our late Monsieur’s Swiss

Guards. Great suspicions are entertained respecting the children of the

Bavaria family, that is, the Elector and his brothers, who are thought to

have been the progeny of an Italian doctor named Simoni. It was said at

Court that the doctor had only given the Elector and his wife a strong

cordial, the effect of which had been to increase their family; but they

are all most suspiciously like the doctor.

I have heard it said that in England the people used to take my late

uncle, Rupert, for a sorcerer, and his large black dog for the Devil;

for this reason, when he joined the army and attacked the enemy, whole

regiments fled before him.

A knight of the Palatinate, who had served many years in India, told me

at Court in that country the first Minister and the keeper of the seals

hated each other mortally. The latter having one day occasion for the

seals, found they had been taken from the casket in which they were

usually kept. He was of course greatly terrified, for his head depended

upon their production. He went to one of his friends, and consulted with

him what he should do. His friend asked him if he had any enemies at

Court. “Yes,” replied the keeper of the seals, “the chief Minister is my

mortal foe.”--“So much the better,” replied his friend; “go and set fire

to your house directly; take out of it nothing but the casket in which

the seals were kept, and take it directly to the chief Minister, telling

him you know no one with whom you can more safely deposit it; then go

home again and save whatever you can. When the fire shall be

extinguished, you must go to the King, and request him to order the chief

Minister to restore you the seals; and you must be sure to open the

casket before the Prince. If the seals are there, all will be explained;

if the Minister has not restored them, you must accuse him at once of

having stolen them; and thus you will be sure to ruin your enemy and

recover your seals.” The keeper of the seals followed his friend’s

advice exactly, and the seals were found again in the casket.

As soon as a royal child, which they call here un Enfant de France, is

born, and has been swaddled, they put on him a grand cordon; but they do

not create him a knight of the order until he has communicated; the

ceremony is then performed in the ordinary manner.

The ladies of chancellors here have the privilege of the tabouret when

they come to the toilette; but in the afternoon they are obliged to

stand. This practice began in the days of Marie de Medicis, when a

chancellor’s wife happened to be in great favour. As she had a lame foot

and could not stand up, the Queen, who would have her come to visit her

every morning, allowed her to sit down. From this time the custom of

these ladies sitting in the morning has been continued.

In the reign of Henri IV. the King’s illegitimate children took

precedence of the Princes of the House of Lorraine. On the day after the

King’s death, the Duc de Verneuil was about to go before the Duc de

Guise, when the latter, taking him by the arm, said, “That might have

been yesterday, but to-day matters are altered.”

Two young Duchesses, not being able to see their lovers, invented the

following stratagem to accomplish their wishes. These two sisters had

been educated in a convent some leagues distant from Paris. A nun of

their acquaintance happening to die there, they pretended to be much

afflicted at it, and requested permission to perform the last duties to

her, and to be present at her funeral. They were believed to be sincere,

and the permission they asked was readily granted them. In the funeral

procession it was perceived that, besides the two ladies, there were two

other persons whom no one knew. Upon being asked who they were, they

replied they were poor priests in need of protection; and that, having

learnt two Duchesses were to be present at the funeral, they had come to

the convent for the purpose of imploring their good offices. When they

were presented to them, the young ladies said they would interrogate them

after the service in their chambers. The young priests waited upon them

at the time appointed, and stayed there until the evening. The Abbess,

who began to think their audience was too long, sent to beg the priests

would retire. One of them seemed very melancholy, but the other laughed

as if he would burst his sides. This was the Duc de Richelieu; the other

was the Chevalier de Guemene, the younger son of the Duke of that name.

The gentlemen themselves divulged the adventure.

The King’s illegitimate children, fearing that they should be treated in

the same way as the Princes of the blood, have for some months past been

engaged in drawing a strong party of the nobility to their side, and have

presented a very unjust petition against the Dukes and Peers. My son has

refused to receive this petition, and has interdicted them from holding

assemblies, the object of which he knows would tend to revolt. They

have, nevertheless, continued them at the instigations of the Duc du

Maine and his wife, and have even carried their insolence so far as to

address a memorial to my son and another to the Parliament, in which they

assert that it is within the province of the nobility alone to decide

between the Princes of the blood and the legitimated Princes. Thirty of

them have signed this memorial, of whom my son has had six arrested;

three of them have been sent to the Bastille, and the other three to

Vincennes; they are MM. de Chatillon, de Rieux, de Beaufremont, de

Polignac, de Clermont, and d’O. The last was the Governor of the Comte

de Toulouse, and remains with him. Clermont’s wife is one of the

Duchesse de Berri’s ladies. She is not the most discreet person in the

world, and has been long in the habit of saying to any one who would

listen to her, “Whatever may come of it, my husband and I are willing to

risk our lives for the Comte de Toulouse.” It is therefore evident that

all this proceeds from the bastards. But I must expose still further the

ingratitude of these people. Chatillon is a poor gentleman, whose father

held a small employment under M. Gaston, one of those offices which

confer the privilege of the entree to the antechambers, and the holders

of which do not sit in the carriage with their masters. The two

descendants, as they call themselves, of the house of Chatillon, insist

that this Chatillon, who married an attorney’s daughter, is descended

from the illegitimate branches of that family. His son was a subaltern

in the Body Guard. In the summer time, when the young officers went to

bathe, they used to take young Chatillon with them to guard their

clothes, and for this office they gave him a crown for his supper.

Monsieur having taken this poor person into his service, gave him a

cordon bleu, and furnished him with money to commence a suit which he

subsequently gained against the House of Chatillon, and they were

compelled to recognize him. He then made him a Captain in the Guards;

gave him a considerable pension, which my son continued, and permitted

him also to have apartments in the Palais Royal. In these very

apartments did this ungrateful man hold those secret meetings, the end of

which was proposed to be my son’s ruin. Rieux’s grandfather had

neglected to uphold the honour to which he was entitled, of being called

the King’s cousin. My son restored him to this honour, gave his brother

a place in the gendarmerie, and rendered him many other services.

Chatillon tried particularly to excite the nobility against my son; and

this is the recompense for all his kindness. My son’s wife is gay and

content, in the hope that all will go well with her brothers.

That old Maintenon has continued pretty tranquil until the termination of

the process relating to the legitimation of the bastards. No one has

heard her utter a single expression on the subject. This makes me

believe that she has some project in her head, but I cannot tell what it

is.

A monk, who was journeying a few days ago to Luzarche, met upon the road

a stranger, who fell into conversation with him. He was an agreeable

companion, and related various adventures very pleasantly. Having

learned from the monk that he was charged with the rents of the convent,

to which some estates in the neighbourhood of Luzarche belonged, the

stranger told him that he belonged to that place, whither he was

returning after a long journey; and then observing to the monk that the

road they were pursuing was roundabout, he pointed out to him a nearer

one through the forest. When they had reached the thickest part of the

wood, the stranger alighted, and, seizing the bridle of the monk’s horse,

demanded his money. The monk replied that he thought he was travelling

with an honest man, and that he was astonished at so singular a demand.

The stranger replied that he had no time for trifling, and that the monk

must either give up his money or his life. The monk replied, “I never

carry money about me; but if you will let me alight and go to my servant,

who carries my money, I will bring you 1,000 francs.”

The robber suffered the monk to alight, who went to his servant, and,

taking from him the 1,000 francs which were in a purse, he at the same

time furnished himself with a loaded pistol which he concealed in his

sleeve. When he returned to the thief, he threw down the purse, and, as

the robber stooped to pick it up, the monk fired and shot him dead; then,

remounting his horse, he hastened to apply to the police, and related his

adventure. A patrole was sent back with him to the wood, and, upon

searching the robber, there were found in his pockets six whistles of

different sizes; they blew the largest of the number, upon which ten

other armed robbers soon afterwards appeared; they defended themselves,

but eventually two of them were killed and the others taken.

The Chevalier Schaub, who was employed in State affairs by Stanhope, the

English Minister, brought with him a secretary, to whom the Prince of

Wales had entrusted sixty guineas, to be paid to a M. d’Isten, who had

made a purchase of some lace to that amount for the Princess of Wales;

the brother of M. d’Isten, then living in London, had also given the same

secretary 200 guineas, to be delivered to his brother at Paris. When the

secretary arrived he enquired at the Ambassador’s where M. d’Isten lived,

and, having procured his address, he went to the house and asked for the

German gentleman. A person appeared, who said, “I am he.” The secretary

suspecting nothing, gave him the Prince of Wales’ letter and the sixty

guineas. The fictitious d’Isten, perceiving that the secretary had a

gold watch, and a purse containing fifty other guineas, detained him to

supper; but no sooner had the secretary drank some wine than he was

seized with an invincible desire to go to sleep. “My good friend,” said

his host, “your journey has fatigued you; you had better undress and lie

down on my bed for a short time.” The secretary, who could not keep his

eyes open, consented; and no sooner had he lain down than he was asleep.

Some time after, his servant came to look for him, and awoke him; the

bottles were still standing before the bed, but the poor secretary’s

pockets were emptied, and the sharper who had personated M. d’Isten had

disappeared with their valuable contents.

The Princesse Maubuisson was astonishingly pleasant and amiable. I was

always delighted to visit her, and never felt myself tired in her

society. I soon found myself in much greater favour than any other of

her nieces, because I could converse with her about almost everybody she

had known in the whole course of her life, which the others could not.

She used frequently to talk German with me, which she knew very well; and

she told me all her adventures. I asked her how she could accustom

herself to the monastic life. She laughed and said, “I never speak to

the nuns but to give orders.” She had a deaf nun with her in her own

chamber, that she might not feel any desire to speak. She told me that

she had always been fond of a country life, and that she still could

fancy herself a country girl. “But,” I asked her, “how do you like

getting up and going to church in the middle of the night?” She replied

that she did as the painters do, who increase the splendour of their

light by the introduction of deep shadows. She had in general the

faculty of giving to all things a turn which deprived them of their

absurdity.

I have often heard M. Bernstorff spoken of by a person who was formerly

very agreeable to him; I mean the Duchess of Mecklenbourg, the Duc de

Luxembourg’s sister. She praised his talents very highly, and assured me

that it was she who gave him to the Duke George William.

The wife of the Marechal de Villars is running after the Comte de

Toulouse. My son is also in her good graces, and is not a whit more

discreet. Marechal de Villars came one day to see me; and, as he

pretends to understand medals, he asked to see mine. Baudelot, who is a

very honest and clever man, and in whose keeping they are, was desired to

show them; he is not the most cautious man in the world, and is very

little acquainted with what is going on at Court. He had written a

dissertation upon one of my medals, in which he proved, against the

opinion of other learned men, that the horned head which it displayed was

that of Pan and not of Jupiter Ammon. Honest Baudelot, to display his

erudition, said to the Marshal, “Ah, Monseigneur, this is one of the

finest medals that Madame possesses: it is the triumph of Cornificius; he

has, you see, all sorts of horns. He was like you, sir, a great general;

he wears the horns of Juno and Faunus. Cornificius was, as you probably

well know, sir, a very able general.” Here I interrupted him. “Let us

pass on,” I said, “to the other medal; if you stop in this manner at

each, you will not have time to show the whole.”

But he, full of his subject, returned to it. “Ah, Madame,” he went on,

“this is worthy of more attention than perhaps any other; Cornificius is,

indeed, one of the most rare medals in the world. Look at it, Madame;

I beg you to observe it narrowly; here, you see, is Juno crowned, and she

is also crowning this great general.” All that I could say to him was

not sufficient to prevent Baudelot talking to the Marshal of horns.

“Monseigneur,” he said, “is well versed in all these matters, and I want

him to see that I am right in insisting that these horns are those of

Faunus, not those of Jupiter Ammon.”

All the people who were in the chamber, with difficulty refrained from

bursting into a loud laugh. If the plan had been laid for the purpose,

it could not have succeeded better. When the Marshal had gone, I, too,

indulged myself by joining in the laugh. It was with great difficulty

that I could make Baudelot understand he had done wrong.

The same Baudelot, one day at a masked ball, had been saying a great many

civil things to the Dowager Madame, who was there masked, and whom,

therefore, he did not know. When he came and saw that it was Madame, he

was terrified with affright: the Princess laughed beyond measure at it.

Our Princes here have no particular costume. When they go to the

Parliament they wear only a cloak, which, in my opinion, has a very

vulgar appearance; and the more so, as they wear the ‘collet’ without a

cravat. Those of the Royal Family have no privileges above the other

Dukes, excepting in their seats and the right of crossing over the

carpet, which is allowed to none but them. The President, when he

addresses them, is uncovered, but keeps his hat on when he speaks to

everybody else. This is the cause of those great disputes which the

Princes of the blood have had with the bastards, as may be seen by their

memorial. The Presidents of the Parliament wear flame-coloured robes

trimmed with ermine at the neck and sleeves.

The Comtesse de Soissons, Angelique Cunegonde, the daughter of

Francois-Henri de Luxembourg, has, it must be confessed, a considerable

share of virtue and of wit; but she has also her faults, like the rest

of the world. It may be said of her that she is truly a poor Princess.

Her husband, Louis-Henri, Chevalier de Soissons, was very ugly, having a

very long hooked nose, and eyes extremely close to it. He was as yellow

as saffron; his mouth was extremely small for a man, and full of bad

teeth of a most villanous odour; his legs were ugly and clumsy; his

knees and feet turned inwards, which made him look when he was walking

like a parrot; and his manner of making a bow was bad. He was rather

short than otherwise; but he had fine hair and a large quantity of it.

He was rather good-looking when a child. I have seen portraits of him

painted at that period. If the Comtesse de Soissons’ son had resembled

his mother, he would have been very well, for her features are good, and

nothing could be better than her, eyes, her mouth, and the turn of her

face; only her nose was too large and thick, and her skin was not fine

enough.

Whoever is like the Prince Eugene in person cannot be called a handsome

man; he is shorter than his elder brother, but, with the exception of

Prince Eugene, all the rest of them are good for nothing. The youngest,

Prince Philippe, was a great madman, and died of the small-pox at Paris.

He was of a very fair complexion, had an ungraceful manner, and always

looked distracted. He had a nose like a hawk, a large mouth, thick lips,

and hollow cheeks; in all respects I thought he was like his elder

brother. The third brother, who was called the Chevalier de Savoie, died

in consequence of a fall from his horse. The Prince Eugene was a younger

brother: he had two sisters, who were equally ugly; one of them is dead,

and the other is still living (1717) in a convent in Savoy. The elder

was of a monstrous shape, but a mere dwarf. She led a very irregular

life. She afterwards ran away with a rogue, the Abbe de la Bourlie, whom

she obliged to marry her at Geneva; they used to beat each other. She is

now dead.

Prince Eugene was not in his younger days so ugly as he has become since;

but he never was good-looking, nor had he any nobility in his manner.

His eyes were pretty good, but his nose, and two large teeth which he

displayed whenever he opened his mouth, completely spoilt his face. He

was besides always very filthy, and his coarse hair was never dressed.

This Prince is little addicted to women, and, during the whole time that

he has been here, I never heard one mentioned who has pleased him, or

whom he has distinguished or visited more than another.

His mother took no care of him; she brought him up like a scullion, and

liked better to stake her money at play than to expend it upon her

youngest son. This is the ordinary practice of women in this country.

They will not yet believe that the Persian Ambassador was an impostor;

[This embassy was always equivocal, and even something more. From

all that can be understood of it, it would seem that a Minister of

one of the Persian provinces, a sort of Intendant de Languedoc, as

we might say, had commissioned this pretended Ambassador to manage

for him some commercial affairs with certain merchants, and that for

his own amusement the agent chose to represent the Persian

Ambassador. It is said, too, that Pontchartrain, under whose

department this affair fell, would not expose the trick, that the

King might be amused, and that he might recommend himself to His

Majesty’s favour by making him believe that the Sophy had sent him

an Ambassador.--Notes to Dangeau’s Journal.]

it is quite certain that he was a clumsy fellow, although he had some

sense. There was an air of magnificence about the way in which he gave

audience. He prevailed upon a married woman, who was pregnant by him,

to abjure Christianity. It is true she was not a very respectable

person, being the illegitimate daughter of my son’s chief almoner, the

Abbe de Grancey, who always kept a little seraglio. In order to carry

her away with him, the Ambassador had her fastened up in a box filled

with holes, and then begged that no person might be allowed to touch it,

being, as he said, filled with the sacred books written by Mahomet

himself, which would be polluted by the contact of Christians. Upon this

pretence the permission was given, and by these means the woman was

carried off. I cannot believe the story which is told of this Ambassador

having had 10,000 louis d’or given him.

I had the misfortune to displease the Margrave John Frederic of Anspach.

He brought me a letter from my brother and his wife, both of whom begged

I would assist him with my advice. I therefore thought that by

counselling him as I should have counselled my own brother I should be

rendering him the best service. When he arrived he was in deep mourning

for his first wife, who had then not been dead three months. I asked him

what he proposed to do in France? He replied “that he was on his way to

England, but that before his departure he should wish to pay his respects

to the King.” I asked him if he had anything to solicit from the King or

to arrange with him. He replied “he had not.”--“Then,” I said, “I would

advise you, if you will permit me, to send the principal person of your

suite to the King to make your compliments, to inform him that you are

going to England, and that you would not have failed to wait upon him,

but that, being in mourning for your wife, your respect for him prevented

your appearing before him in so melancholy a garb.”--“But,” he rejoined,

“I am very fond of dancing, and I wish to go to the ball; now I cannot go

thither until I have first visited the King.”--“For God’s sake,” I said,

“do not go to the ball; it is not the custom here. You will be laughed

at, and the more particularly so because the Marechal de Grammont, who

presented you to the King some years ago, said that you could find

nothing to praise in the whole of France, with the exception of a little

goldfinch in the King’s cabinet which whistled airs. I recommend you not

to go to see the King, nor to be present at the ball.” He was angry, and

said “he saw very well that I discountenanced German Princes, and did not

wish them to be presented to the King.” I replied “that the advice I had

given him sprang from the best intentions, and was such as I would have

given to my own brother.” He went away quite angry to Marechal

Schomberg’s, where he complained of my behaviour to him. The Marshal

asked him what I had said, which he repeated word for word. The Marshal

told him that I had advised him well, and that he was himself of my

opinion. Nevertheless, the Margrave persisted on being presented to the

King, whither he prevailed upon the Marshal to accompany him, and went

the next day to the ball. He was extremely well dressed in

half-mourning, with white lace over the black, fine blue ribands, black

and white laces, and rheingraves, which look well upon persons of a good

figure; in short, he was magnificently dressed, but improperly, for a

widower in the first stage of his mourning. He would have seated himself

within the King’s circle, where none but the members of the Royal Family

and the King’s grandchildren are allowed to sit; the Princes of the blood

even are not allowed to do so, and therefore foreign Princes can of

course have no right. The Margrave then began to repent not having

believed me, and early the next morning he set off.

Prince Ragotzky is under great obligations to his wife, who saved his

life and delivered him from prison. Some person was repeating things to

her disadvantage, but he interrupted them by saying, “She saved my head

from the axe, and this prevents my having any right to reprove too

strictly whatever she may choose to do; for this reason I shall not thank

any person who speaks to me upon the subject.”

[Louis XIV. gave to the Prince Ragotsky, who in France took the

title of Comte de Saaross, 200,000 crowns upon the Maison de Ville,

and a pension of 2,000 crowns per month besides.]

Beatrice Eleanora, the Queen of James II., was always upon such good

terms with Maintenon that it is impossible to believe our late King was

ever fond of her. I have seen a book, entitled “L’ancien Ward protecteur

du nouveau,” in 12mo, in which is related a gallantry between the Queen

and the Pere la Chaise. The confessor was then eighty years of age, and

not unlike an ass; his ears were very long, his mouth very wide, his head

very large, and his body very long. It was an ill-chosen joke. This

libel was even less credible than what was stated about the King himself.

The Monks of Saint Mihiel possess the original manuscripts of the Memoirs

of Cardinal Retz. They have had them printed and are selling them at

Nancy; but in this copy there are many omissions. A lady at Paris,

Madame Caumartin, has a copy in which there is not a word deficient; but

she obstinately refused to lend it that the others may be made complete.

When an Ambassador would make his entry at Paris he has himself announced

some days before by the officers whose duty it is to introduce

Ambassadors, in order that the usual compliments may be paid him. To

royal Ambassadors a chevalier d’honneur is sent, to those from Venice or

Holland the first equerry, and when he is absent or unwell the chief

Maitre d’Hotel, who is also sent to the Ambassador from Malta.

The English ladies are said to be much given to running away with their

lovers. I knew a Count von Konigsmark, whom a young English lady

followed in the dress of a page. He had her with him at Chambord, and,

as there was no room for her in the castle, he lodged her under a tent

which he had put up in the forest. When we were at the chase one day he

told me this adventure. As I had a great curiosity to see her, I rode

towards the tent, and never in my life did I see anything prettier than

this girl in the habit of a page. She had large and beautiful eyes, a

charming little nose, and an elegant mouth and teeth. She smiled when

she saw me, for she suspected that the Count had told me the whole story.

Her hair was a beautiful chestnut colour, and hung about her neck in

large curls. After their departure from Chambord, while they were at an

inn upon their way to Italy, the innkeeper’s wife ran to the Count,

crying, “Sir, make haste upstairs, for your page is lying-in.” She was

delivered of a girl, and the mother and child were soon afterwards placed

in a convent near Paris. While the Count lived he took great care of

her, but he died in the Morea, and his pretended page did not long

survive him; she displayed great piety in the hour of death. A friend of

the Count’s, and a nephew of Madame de Montespan, took care of the child,

and after his death the King gave the little creature a pension. I

believe she is still (1717) in the convent.

The Abbe Perrault founded an annual funeral oration for the Prince de

Conde in the Jesuits’ Church, where his heart is deposited. I shall not

upon this occasion call to mind his victories, his courage in war, or his

timidity at Court; these are things well known throughout France.

A gentleman of my acquaintance at Paris heard a learned Abbe, who was in

the confidence of Descartes, say that the philosopher used often to laugh

at his own system, and said, “I have cut them out some work: we shall see

who will be fools enough to undertake it.”

That old Beauvais, the Queen-mother’s first femme de chambre, was

acquainted with the secret of her marriage, and this obliged the Queen to

put up with whatever the confidante chose to do. From this circumstance

has arisen that custom which gives femmes de chambre so much authority in

our apartments. The Queen-mother, the widow of Louis XIII., not

contented with loving Cardinal Mazarin, went the absurd length of

marrying him. He was not a priest, and therefore was not prevented by

his orders from contracting matrimony. He soon, however, got very tired

of the poor Queen, and treated her dreadfully ill, which is the ordinary

result in such marriages. But it is the vice of the times to contract

clandestine marriages. The Queen-mother of England, the widow of Charles

II., made such an one in marrying her chevalier d’honneur, who behaved

very ill to her; while the poor Queen was in want of food and fuel, he

had a good fire in his apartment, and was giving great dinners. He

called himself Lord Germain, Earl of St. Albans; he never addressed a

kind expression to the Queen. As to the Queen-mother’s marriage, all the

circumstances relating to it are now well enough known. The secret

passage by which he went nightly to the Palais Royal may still be seen;

when she used to visit him, he was in the habit of saying, “what does

this woman want with me?” He was in love with a lady of the Queen’s

suite, whom I knew very well: she had apartments in the Palais Royal, and

was called Madame de Bregie. As she was very pretty, she excited a good

deal of passion; but she was a very honest lady, who served the Queen

with great fidelity, and was the cause of the Cardinal’s living upon

better terms with the Queen than before. She had very good sense.

Monsieur loved her for her fidelity to the Queen his mother. She has

been dead now four-and-twenty years (1717).

The Princesse de Deux Ponts has recently furnished another instance of

the misfortune which usually attends the secret marriages of ladies of

high birth. She married her equerry, was very ill-treated by him, and

led a very miserable life; but she deserved all she met with and I

foresaw it. She was with me at the Opera once, and insisted at all

events that her equerry should sit behind her. “For God’s sake,” I said

to her, “be quiet, and give yourself no trouble about this Gerstorf; you

do not know the manners of this country; when folks perceive you are so

anxious about that man, they will think you are in love with him.” I did

not know then how near this was to the truth. She replied, “Do people,

then, in this country take no care of their servants?”--“Oh, yes,”

I said, “they request some of their friends to carry them to the Opera,

but they do not go with them.”

M. Pentenrieder is a perfect gentleman, extremely well-bred, totally

divested of the vile Austrian manners, and speaks good German instead of

the jargon of Austria. While he was staying here, the Fair of

Saint-Germain commenced; a giant, who came to Paris for the purpose of

exhibiting himself, having accidentally met M. Pentenrieder, said as soon

as he saw him, “It’s all over with me: I shall not go into the fair; for

who will give money to see me while this man shows himself for nothing?”

and he really went away. M. Pentenrieder pleased everybody. Count

Zinzendorf, who succeeded him, did not resemble him at all, but was a

perfect Austrian in his manners and his language.

I have heard that it was from the excitement of insulted honour that

Ravaillac was induced to murder Henri IV.; for that the King had seduced

his sister, and had abandoned her during her pregnancy: the brother then

swore he would be avenged on the King. Some persons even accuse the Duc

d’Epernon, who was seated in the coach in such a manner that he might

have warded off the blow, but he is said to have drawn back and given the

assassin an opportunity to strike.

When I first came to France I found in it such an assemblage of talent as

occurs but in few ages. There was Lulli in music; Beauchamp in ballets;

Corneille and Racine in tragedy; Moliere in comedy; La Chamelle and La

Beauval, actresses; and Baron, Lafleur, Toriliere, and Guerin, actors.

Each of these persons was excellent in his way. La Ducloa and La Raisin

were also very good; the charms of the latter had even penetrated the

thick heart of our Dauphin, who loved her very tenderly: her husband was

excellent in comic parts. There was also a very good harlequin, and as

good a scaramouch. Among the best performers at the Opera were Clediere,

Pomereuil, Godenarche, Dumenil, La Rochechouard, Maury, La Saint

Christophe, La Brigogne, La Beaucreux. All that we see and hear now do

not equal them.

That which pleased me most in Beauvernois’ life is the answer he made to

the Prince of Vaudemont. When he was fleeing, and had arrived at

Brussels, he gave himself out for a Prince of Lorraine. M. de Vaudemont

sent for him, and, upon seeing him, said,--“I know all the Princes of

Lorraine, but I do not know you.”--“I assure you, sir,” replied

Beauvernois, “that I am as much a Prince of Lorraine as you are.”

I like that Mercy who tricked his master, the Duc de Lorraine. When he

reached Nancy he requested the Duke to recruit three regiments, which he

said should be his own. The Duke did recruit them, fully persuaded they

were to be his; but when the companies were filled, Mercy begged the

Emperor to give them to him, and he actually obtained them; so that the

Duke had not the appointment of a single officer.

The poor Duchess of Mecklenbourg, the wife of Christian Louis, was a very

good woman when one was thoroughly acquainted with her. She told me the

whole history of her intrigue with Bernstorff. She regulated her

household very well, and had always two carriages. She did not affect

the splendour of a sovereign; but she kept up her rank better than the

other Duchesses, and I liked her the better for this. The husband,

Christian Louis of Mecklenbourg, was a notable fool. He one day demanded

an audience of the King, under the pretence of having something of

importance to say to him. Louis XIV. was then more than forty years old.

When the Duke found himself in the King’s presence, he said to him,

“Sire, you seem to me to have grown.” The King laughed, and said,

“Monsieur, I am past the age of growing.”--“Sire,” rejoined the Duke,

“do you know everybody says I am very much like you, and quite as

good-looking as you are?”--“That is very probable,” said the King, still

laughing. The audience was then finished, and the Duke went away. This

fool could never engage his brother-in-law’s favour, for M. de Luxembourg

had no regard for him.

When the Queen had the government of the country, all the females of the

Court, even to the very servants, became intriguers. They say it was the

most ridiculous thing in the world to see the eagerness with which women

meddled with the Queen-mother’s regency. At the commencement she knew

nothing at all. She made a present to her first femme de chambre of five

large farms, upon which the whole Court subsisted. When she went to the

Council to propose the affair, everybody laughed, and she was asked how

she proposed to live. She was quite astonished when the thing was

explained to her, for she thought she had only given away five ordinary

farms. This anecdote is very true and was related to me by the old

Chancellor Le Tellier, who was present at the Council. She is said often

to have laughed as she confessed her ignorance. Many other things of a

similar nature happened during the regency.

There is a Bishop of a noble family, tolerably young but very ugly, who

was at first so devout that he thought of entering La Trappe; he wore his

hair combed down straight, and dared not look a woman in the face.

Having learned that in the city where he held his see there was a frail

fair one, whose gallantries had become notorious, he felt a great desire

to convert her and to make her come to the confessional. She was, it is

said, a very pretty woman, and had, moreover, a great deal of wit.

No sooner had the Bishop began to visit than he began to pay attention to

his hair: first he powdered it, and then he had it dressed. At length he

swallowed the bait so completely, that he neither quitted the fair siren

by night nor by day. His clergy ventured to exhort him to put an end to

this scandal, but he replied that, if they did not cease their

remonstrances, he would find means of making them. At length he even

rode through the city in his carriage with his fair penitent.

The people became so enraged at this that they pelted him with stones.

His relations repaired to his diocese for the purpose of exhorting him in

their turn, but he would only receive his mother, and would not even

follow her advice. His relations then applied to the Regent to summon

the lady to Paris. She came, but her lover followed and recovered her;

at length she was torn from him by a lettre-de-cachet, and taken from his

arms to a house of correction. The Bishop is in a great rage, and

declares that he will never forgive his family for the affront which has

been put upon him (1718).

The Queen-mother is said to have eaten four times a day in a frightful

manner, and this practice is supposed to have brought on that cancer in

the breast, which she sought to conceal by strong Spanish perfumes, and

of which she died.

Those female branches of the French Royal Family, who are called Enfants

de France, all bear the title of Madame. For this reason it is that in

the brevets they are called Madame la Duchesse de Berri; Madame la

Duchesse d’Orleans; but in conversation they are called the Duchesse de

Berri, the Duchesse d’Orleans; or, rather, one should say, Madame de

Berri will have it so with respect to herself. The title of Duchesse

d’Orleans belongs to Madame la Duchesse d’Orleans, as granddaughter.

Such is the custom prevalent here. The brother and the sister-in-law of

the King are called simply Monsieur and Madame, and these titles are also

contained in my brevets; but I suffer myself to be called commonly Madame

la Duchesse d’Orleans. Madame de Berri will be called Madame la Duchess

de Berri, because, being only an Enfant de France of the third descent,

she has need of that title to set off her relationship. There is nothing

to be said for this: if there were any unmarried daughters of the late

King, each would be called Madame, with the addition of their baptismal

name.

It seems that Queen Mary of England was something of a coquette in

Holland. Comte d’Avaux, the French Ambassador, told me himself that he

had had a secret interview with her at the apartments of one of the

Queen’s Maids of Honour, Madame Treslane. The Prince of Orange, becoming

acquainted with the affair, dismissed the young lady, but invented some

other pretext that the real cause might not be known.

Three footmen had a quarrel together; two of them refused to admit the

third to their table, saying, “as he and his master only serve a

president’s wife, he cannot presume to compare himself with us, who serve

Princesses and Duchesses.” The rejected footman called another fellow to

his aid, and a violent squabble ensued. The commissaire was called: he

found that they served three brothers, the sons of a rich merchant at

Rouen; two of them had bought companies in the French Guards; one of the

two had an intrigue with the wife of Duc d’Abret, and the other with the

Duchesse de Luxembourg, while the third was only engaged with the wife of

a president. The two former were called Colande and Maigremont; and, as

at the same time the Duc d’Abret, the son of the Duc de Bouillon, was in

love with the lady of the President Savari.

The Envoy from Holstein, M. Dumont, was very much attached to Madame de

La Rochefoucauld, one of Madame de Berri’s ‘dames du palais’. She was

very pretty, but gifted with no other than personal charms. Some one was

joking her on this subject, and insinuated that she had treated her lover

very favourably. “Oh! no,” she replied, “that is impossible, I assure

you, entirely impossible.” When she was urged to say what constituted

the impossibility, she replied, “If I tell, you will immediately agree

with me that it is quite impossible.” Being pressed still further, she

said, with a very serious air, “Because he is a Protestant!”

When the marriage of Monsieur was declared, he said to Saint-Remi, “Did

you know that I was married to the Princesse de Lorraine?”--

“No, Monsieur,” replied the latter; “I knew very well that you lived with

her, but I did not think you would have married her.”

Queen Marie de Medicis, the wife of Henri IV., was one day walking at the

Tuileries with her son, the Dauphin, when the King’s mistress came into

the garden, having also her son with her. The mistress said very,

insolently, to the Queen, “There are our two Dauphins walking together,

but mine is a fairer one than yours.” The Queen gave her a smart box on

the ear, and said at the same time, “Let this impertinent woman be taken

away.” The mistress ran instantly to Henri IV. to complain, but the

King, having heard her story, said, “This is your own fault; why did you

not speak to the Queen with the respect which you owe to her?”

Madame de Fiennes, who in her youth had been about the Queen-mother, used

always to say to the late Monsieur, “The Queen, your mother, was a very

silly woman; rest her soul!” My aunt, the Abbess of Maubuisson, told me

that she saw at the Queen’s a man who was called “the repairer of the

Queen’s face;” that Princess, as well as all the ladies of the Court,

wore great quantities of paint.

On account of the great services which the House of Arpajon in France had

rendered to the Order of Malta, a privilege was formerly granted that the

second son of that family, should at his birth become a Knight of the

Order without the necessity of any proof or any inquiry as to his mother.

The Czar Peter I. is not mad; he has sense enough, and if he had not

unfortunately been so brutally educated he would have made a good prince.

The way in which he behaved to his Czarowitz (Alexis) is horrible. He

gave his word that he would do him no injury, and afterwards poisoned him

by means of the Sacrament. This is so impious and abominable that I can

never forgive him for it (1719).

The last Duc d’Ossuna had, it is said, a very beautiful, but at the same

time a passionate and jealous wife. Having learnt that her husband had

chosen a very fine stuff for the dress of his mistress, an actress, she

went to the merchant and procured it of him. He, thinking it was

intended for her, made no scruple of delivering it to her. After it was

made up she put it on, and, showing it to her husband, said, “Do not you

think it is very beautiful?” The husband, angry at the trick, replied,

“Yes, the stuff is very beautiful, but it is put to an unworthy use.”

“That is what everybody says of me,” retorted the Duchess.

At Fontainebleau in the Queen’s cabinet may be seen the portrait of La

Belle Terronniere, who was so much beloved by Francois I., and who was

the unwitting cause of his death.

I have often walked at night in the gallery at Fontainebleau where the

King’s ghost is said to appear, but the good Francois I. never did me

the honour to show himself. Perhaps it was because he thought my prayers

were not efficacious enough to draw him from purgatory, and in this I

think he was quite right.

King James II. died with great firmness and resolution, and without any

bigotry; that is to say, very differently from the manner in which he had

lived. I saw and spoke to him four-and-twenty hours before his death.

“I hope,” I said, “soon to hear of your Majesty’s getting better.” He

smiled and said, “If I should die, shall I not have lived long enough?”

I hardly know how to rejoice at the accession of our Prince George to the

Throne of England, for I have no confidence in the English people. I

remember still too well the fine speeches which were made here not long

ago by Lord Peterborough. I would rather that our Elector was Emperor of

Germany, and I wish that the King who is here (James II.) was again in

possession of England, because the kingdom belongs to him. I fear that

the inconstancy of the English will in the end produce some scheme which

may be injurious to us. Perhaps there was never in any nation a King who

had been crowned with more eclat, or tumultuous joy than James II.; and

yet the same nation since persecuted him in the most pitiless manner, and

has so tormented his innocent son that he can scarcely find an asylum

after all his heavy misfortunes.

[The Duchesse D’Orleans was, by the mother’s side, granddaughter of

James I, which explains the interest she took in the fate of the

Stuart family.]

If the English were to be trusted I should say that it is fortunate the

Parliaments are in favour of George; but the more one reads the history

of English Revolutions, the more one is compelled to remark the eternal

hatred which the people of that nation have had towards their Kings, as

well as their fickleness (1714).

Have I not reason to fear on George’s account since he has been made King

of England, and knowing as I do the desire he had to be King of another

country? I know the accursed English too well to trust them. May God

protect their Majesties the Princes, and all the family, but I confess I

fear for them greatly (1715).

The poor Princess of Wales

[Wilhelmina-Dorothea-Charlotte, daughter of John Frederick, Margrave

of Anspach, born in 1682, married to the Prince of Wales in 1706.

The particulars of the quarrel between George I. and his son, the

Prince of Wales, will be found in Cose’s “Memoirs of Sir Robert

Walpole.”]

has caused me great uneasiness since her letter of the 3rd (15th) of

February (1718). She has implored the King’s pardon as one implores the

pardon of God, but without success. I know nothing about it, but dread

lest the Prince should partake his mother’s disgrace. I think, however,

since the King has declared the Prince to be his son, he should treat him

as such, and not act so haughtily against the Princess, who has never

offended him, but has always treated him with the respect due to a

father. Nothing good can result from the present state of affairs; and

the King had better put an end to a quarrel which gives occasion to a

thousand impertinences, and revives awkward stories which were better

forgotten.

The King of England has returned to London in good health (1719). The

Prince of Wales causes me great anxiety. He thought he should do well to

send one of his gentlemen to his father, to assure him in most submissive

terms of the joy he felt at his happy return. The King not only would

not receive the letter, but he sent back the gentleman with a very harsh

rebuke, revoking at the same time the permission, which before his

journey he had given to the Prince of Wales, to see his daughter, whom

the Prince loves very tenderly; this really seems too severe. It may be

said that the King is rather descended from the race of the Czar than

from that of Brunswick and the Palatinate. Such conduct can do him no

good.

M. d’Entremont, the last Ambassador from Sicily, was upon the point of

departing, and had already had his farewell audience, when some

circumstance happened which compelled him to stay some time longer.

He found himself without a lodging, for his hotel had been already let.

A lady seeing the embarrassment in which Madame d’Entremont was thus

placed, said to her, “Madame, I have pleasure in offering you my house,

my own room, and my own bed.” The Ambassador’s lady not knowing what to

do, accepted the offer with great readiness. She went to the lady’s

house, and as she is old and in ill health, she went to bed immediately.

Towards midnight she heard a noise like that of some person opening a

secret door. In fact, a door in the wall by the bedside was opened.

Some one entered, and began to undress. The lady called out, “Who is

there?” A voice replied, “It is I; be quiet.” “Who are you?” asked the

lady. “What is the matter with you?” was the reply. “You were not wont

to be so particular. I am undressing, and shall come to bed directly.”

At these words the lady cried out, “Thieves!” with all her might, and the

unknown person dressed himself quickly, and withdrew.

When the Electoral Prince of Saxony came hither, he addressed a pretty

compliment to the King, which we all thought was his own, and we

therefore conceived a very favourable notion of his parts. He did not,

however, keep up that good opinion, and probably the compliment was made

for him by the Elector-Palatine. The King desired the Duchesse de Berri

to show him about Marly. He walked with her for an hour without ever

offering her his arm or saying one word to her. While they were

ascending a small hill, the Palatine, his Governor, nodded to him; and as

the Prince did not understand what he meant, he was at length obliged to

say to him, “Offer your arm to the Duchesse de Berri.” The Prince

obeyed, but without saying a word. When they reached the summit, “Here,”

said the Duchesse de Berri, “is a nice place for blindman’s buff.” Then,

for the first time, he opened his mouth, and said, “Oh, yes; I am very

willing to play.” Madame de Berri was too much fatigued to play; but the

Prince continued amusing himself the whole day without offering the least

civility to the Duchess, who had taken such pains for him. This will

serve to show how puerile the Prince is.

..........................

We have had here several good repartees of Duke Bernard von Weimar.

One day a young Frenchman asked him, “How happened it that you lost the

battle?”--“I will tell you, sir,” replied the Duke, coolly; “I thought I

should win it, and so I lost it. But,” he said, turning himself slowly

round, “who is the fool that asked me this question?”

Father Joseph was in great favour with Cardinal Richelieu, and was

consulted by him on all occasions. One day, when the Cardinal had

summoned Duke Bernard to the Council, Father Joseph, running his finger

over a map, said, “Monsieur, you must first take this city; then that,

and then that.” The Duke Bernard listened to him for some time, and at

length said, “But, Monsieur Joseph, you cannot take cities with your

finger.” This story always made the King laugh heartily.

..........................

M. de Brancas was very deeply in love with the lady whom he married. On

his wedding-day he went to take a bath, and was afterwards going to bed

at the bath-house. “Why are you going to bed here, sir?” said his valet

de chambre; “do you not mean to go to your wife?”--“I had quite

forgotten,” he replied. He was the Queen-mother’s chevalier d’honneur.

One day, while she was at church, Brancas forgot that the Queen was

kneeling before him, for as her back was very round, her head could

hardly be seen when she hung it down. He took her for a prie-dieu, and

knelt down upon her, putting his elbows upon her shoulders. The Queen

was of course not a little surprised to find her chevalier d’honneur upon

her back, and all the bystanders were ready to die with laughing.

Dr. Chirac was once called to see a lady, and, while he was in her

bedchamber, he heard that the price of stock had considerably decreased.

As he happened to be a large holder of the Mississippi Bonds, he was

alarmed at the news; and being seated near the patient, whose pulse he

was feeling, he said with a deep sigh, “Ah, good God! they keep sinking,

sinking, sinking!” The poor sick lady hearing this, uttered a loud

shriek; the people ran to her immediately. “Ah,” said she, “I shall die;

M. de Chirac has just said three times, as he felt my pulse, ‘They keep

sinking!’” The Doctor recovered himself soon, and said, “You dream; your

pulse is very healthy, and you are very well. I was thinking of the

Mississippi stocks, upon which I lose my money, because their price

sinks.” This explanation satisfied the sick lady.

The Duc de Sully was subject to frequent fits of abstraction. One day,

having dressed himself to go to church, he forgot nothing but his

breeches. This was in the winter; when he entered the church, he said,

“Mon Dieu, it is very cold to-day.” The persons present said, “Not

colder than usual!”--“Then I am in a fever,” he said. Some one suggested

that he had perhaps not dressed himself so warmly as usual, and, opening

his coat, the cause of his being cold was very apparent.

Our late King told me the following anecdote of Queen Christina of

Sweden: That Princess, instead of putting on a nightcap, wrapped her head

up in a napkin. One night she could not sleep, and ordered the musicians

to be brought into her bedroom; where, drawing the bed-curtains, she

could not be seen by the musicians, but could hear them at her ease. At

length, enchanted at a piece which they had just played, she abruptly

thrust her head beyond the curtains, and cried out, “Mort diable! but

they sing delightfully!” At this grotesque sight, the Italians, and

particularly the castrati, who are not the bravest men in the world, were

so frightened that they were obliged to stop short.

In the great gallery at Fontainebleau may still be seen the blood of the

man whom she caused to be assassinated; it was to prevent his disclosing

some secrets of which he was in possession that she deprived him of life.

He had, in fact, begun to chatter through jealousy of another person who

had gained the Queen’s favour. Christina was very vindictive, and given

up to all kinds of debauchery.

Duke Frederick Augustus of Brunswick was delighted with Christina; he

said that he had never in his life met a woman who had so much wit, and

whose conversation was so truly diverting; he added that it was

impossible to be dull with her for a moment. I observed to him that the

Queen in her conversation frequently indulged in very filthy discussions.

“That is true,” replied he, “but she conceals such things in so artful a

manner as to take from them all their disgusting features.” She never

could be agreeable to women, for she despised them altogether.

Saint Francois de Sales, who founded the order of the Sisters of Saint

Mary, had in his youth been extremely intimate with the Marechal de

Villeroi, the father of the present Marshal. The old gentleman could

therefore never bring himself to call his old friend a saint. When any

one spoke in his presence of Saint Francois de Sales, he used to say, “I

was delighted when I saw M. de Sales become a saint; he used to delight

in talking indecently, and always cheated at play; but in every other

respect he was one of the best gentlemen in the world, and perhaps one of

the most foolish.”

M. de Cosnac, Archbishop of Aix, was at a very advanced age when he

learnt that Saint Francois de Sales had been canonized. “What!”

cried he, “M. de Geneve, my old friend? I am delighted at his good

fortune; he was a gallant man, an amiable man, and an honest man,

too, although he would sometimes cheat at piquet, at which we have

often played together.”--“But, sir,” said some one present, “is it

possible that a saint could be a sharper at play?”--“No,” replied

the Archbishop, “he said, as a reason for it, that he gave all his

winnings to the poor.” [Loisirs d’un homme d’etat, et Dictionnaire

Historique, tom. vii. Paris, 1810.]

While Frederick Charles de Wurtemberg, the administrateur of that duchy,

was staying at Paris, the Princesse Marianne de Wurtemberg, Duke Ulric’s

daughter, was there also with her mother. Expecting then to marry her

cousin,

[The learned Journal of Gottengin for the year 1789, No. 30,

observes there must be some mistake here, because in 1689, when this

circumstance is supposed to have occurred, the administrateur had

been married seven years, and had children at Stuttgard.]

she had herself painted as Andromeda and her cousin as Perseus as the

latter wore no helmet, everybody could of course recognize him. But when

he went away without having married her, she had a casque painted, which

concealed the face, and said she would not have another face inserted

until she should be married. She was then about nineteen years old.

Her mother said once at Court, “My daughter has not come with me to-day

because she is gone to confess; but, poor child, what can she have to say

to her confessor, except that she has dropped some stitches in her work.”

Madame de Fiennes, who was present, whispered, “The placid old fool!

as if a stout, healthy girl of nineteen had no other sins to confess

than having dropped some stitches.”

A village pastor was examining his parishioners in their catechism. The

first question in the Heidelberg catechism is this: “What is thy only

consolation in life and in death?” A young girl, to whom the pastor put

this question, laughed, and would not answer. The priest insisted.

“Well, then,” said she at length, “if I must tell you, it is the young

shoemaker who lives in the Rue Agneaux.”

The late Madame de Nemours had charitably brought up a poor child.

When the child was about nine years old, she said to her benefactress,

“Madame, no one can be more grateful for your charity than I am, and I

cannot acknowledge it better than by telling everybody I am your

daughter; but do not be alarmed, I will not say that I am your lawful

child, only your illegitimate daughter.”

The Memoirs of Queen Margaret of Navarre are merely a romance compared

with those of Mdlle. de La Force. The authoress’s own life was a

romance. Being extremely poor, although of an ancient and honourable

family, she accepted the office of demoiselle d’honneur to the Duchesse

de Guise. Here the Marquis de Nesle, father of the present Marquis

(1720), became enamoured of her, after having received from her a small

bag to wear about his neck, as a remedy against the vapours. He would

have married her, but his relations opposed this intention on the score

of Mdlle. de La Force’s poverty, and because she had improperly quitted

the Duchesse de Guise. The Great Conde, the Marquis de Nesle’s nearest

relation, took him to Chattillon that he might forget his love for Mdlle.

de La Force; all the Marquis’s relations were there assembled for the

purpose of declaring to him that they would never consent to his marriage

with Mdlle. de La Force; and he on his part told them that he would never

while he lived marry any other person. In a moment of despair, he rushed

out to the garden and would have thrown himself into the canal, but that

the strings, with which Mdlle. de La Force had tied the bag about his

neck, broke, and the bag fell at his feet. His thoughts appeared to

undergo a sudden change, and Mdlle. de La Force seemed to him to be as

ugly as she really is. He went instantly to the Prince and his other

relations who were there, and told them what had just happened. They

searched about in the garden for the bag and the strings, and, opening

it, they found it to contain two toads’ feet holding a heart wrapped up

in a bat’s wing, and round the whole a paper inscribed with

unintelligible cyphers. The Marquis was seized with horror at the sight.

He told me this story with his own mouth. Mdlle. de La Force after this

fell in love with Baron, but as he was not bewitched, the intrigue did

not last long: he used to give a very amusing account of the declaration

she made to him. Then a M. Briou, the son of a Councillor of that name,

became attached to her; his relations, who would by no means have

consented to such a marriage, shut the young man up. La Force, who has

a very fertile wit, engaged an itinerant musician who led about dancing

bears in the street, and intimated to her lover that, if he would express

a wish to see the bears dance in the courtyard of his, own house, she

would come to him disguised in a bear’s skin. She procured a bear’s skin

to be made so as to fit her, and went to M. Briou’s house with the bears;

the young man, under the pretence of playing with this bear, had an

opportunity of conversing with her and of laying their future plans.

He then promised his father that he would submit to his will, and thus

having regained his liberty he immediately married Mdlle. de La Force,

and went with her to Versailles, where the King gave them apartments,

and where Madame de Briou was every day with the Dauphine of Bavaria,

who admired her wit and was delighted with her society. M. de Briou was

not then five-and-twenty years of age, a very good-looking and well-bred

young man. His father, however, procured a dissolution of the marriage

by the Parliament, and made him marry another person. Madame de Briou

thus became once more Mdlle. de La Force, and found herself without

husband and money. I cannot tell how it was that the King and her

parents, both of whom had consented to the marriage, did not oppose its

dissolution. To gain a subsistence she set about composing romances, and

as she was often staying with the Princesse de Conti, she dedicated to

her that of Queen Margaret.

We have had four Dukes who have bought coffee, stuffs, and even candles

for the purpose of selling them again at a profit. It was the Duke de La

Force who bought the candles. One evening, very recently, as he was

going out of the Opera, the staircase was filled with young men, one of

whom cried out, as he passed, “His purse!”--“No,” said another, “there

can be no money in it; he would not risk it; it must be candles that he

has bought to sell again.” They then sang the air of the fourth act of

‘Phaeton’.

[The Duke, together with certain other persons, made considerable

purchases of spice, porcelain, and other merchandizes, for the

purpose of realizing the hope of Law’s Banks. As he was not held in

estimation either by the public or by the Parliament, the Duke was

accused of monopoly; and by a decree of the Parliament, in concert

with the Peers, he was enjoined “to use more circumspection for the

future, and to conduct himself irreproachably, in a manner as should

be consistent with his birth and his dignity as a Peer of France.”]

The Queen Catherine (de Medicis) was a very wicked woman. Her uncle, the

Pope, had good reason for saying that he had made a bad present to

France. It is said that she poisoned her youngest son because he had

discovered her in a common brothel whither she had gone privately. Who

can wonder that such a woman should drink out of a cup covered with

designs from Aretino. The Pope had an object in sending her to France.

Her son was the Duc d’Alencon; and as they both remained incog. the world

did not know that they were mother and son, which occasioned frequent

mistakes.

The young Count Horn, who has just been executed here (1720), was

descended from a well-known Flemish family; he was distinguished at first

for the amiable qualities of his head and for his wit. At college he was

a model for good conduct, application, and purity of morals; but the

intimacy which he formed with some libertine young men during his stay at

the Academy of Paris entirely changed him. He contracted an insatiable

desire for play, and even his own father said to him, “You will die by

the hands of the executioner.” Being destitute of money, the young Count

took up the trade of a pickpocket, which he carried on in the pit of the

theatres, and by which he made considerable gains in silver-hilted swords

and watches. At length, having lost a sum of five-and-twenty thousand

crowns at the fair of Saint-Germain, he was led to commit that crime

which he has just expiated on the scaffold. For the purpose of

discharging the debt he had contracted, he sent for a banker’s clerk to

bring him certain bank bills, which he proposed to purchase. Having

connected himself with two other villains, he attacked the clerk as soon

as he arrived, and stabbed him with poniards which he had bought three

days before on the Pont Neuf. Hoping to conceal the share which he had

taken in this crime, he went immediately after its perpetration to the

Commissaire du Quartier, and told him, with a cool and determined air,

that he had been obliged, in his own defence, to kill the clerk, who had

attacked him and put him in danger of his life. The Commissaire looking

at him steadfastly, said, “You are covered with blood, but you are not

even wounded; I must retain you in custody until I can examine this

affair more minutely.” At this moment the accomplice entered the room.

“Here, sir,” said the Count to the Commissaire, “is one who can bear

testimony that the account I have given you of this business is perfectly

true.” The accomplice was quite terrified at hearing this; he thought

that Count Horn had confessed his crime, and that there could be no

advantage in continuing to deny it; he therefore confessed all that had

taken place, and thus the murder was revealed. The Count was not more

than two-and-twenty years of age, and one of the handsomest men in Paris.

Some of the first persons in France solicited in his favour, but the Duke

Regent thought it necessary to make an example of him on account of the

prevalent excess of crime. Horn was publicly broken on the wheel with

his second accomplice; the other died just before: they were both

gentlemen and of noble families. When they arrived at the place of

punishment, they begged the people to implore the pardon of Heaven upon

their sins. The spectators were affected to tears, but they nevertheless

agreed in the just severity of their punishment. The people said aloud

after the execution, “Our Regent has done justice.”

One lady was blaming another, her intimate friend, for loving a very

ugly man. The latter said, “Did he ever speak to you tenderly or

passionately?”--“No,” replied the former. “Then you cannot judge,” said

her friend, “whether I ought to love him or not.”

Madame de Nemours used to say, “I have observed one thing in this

country, ‘Honour grows again as well as hair.’”

An officer, a gentleman of talent, whose name was Hautmont, wrote the

following verses upon Cardinal Mazarin, for which he was locked up in the

Bastille for eighteen months:

Creusons tous le tombeau

A qui nous persecute;

A ce Jules nouveauu

Cherchons un nouveau Brute.

Que le jour serait beau,

Si nous voyions sa chute!

The Queen-mother could not endure Boisrobert on account of his impiety;

she did not like him to visit her sons, the King and Monsieur, in their

youth, but they were very fond of him because he used to amuse them.

When he was at the point of death, the Queen-mother sent some priests to

convert him and to prepare him for confession. Boisrobert appeared

inclined to confess. “Yes, mon Dieu,” said he, devoutly joining his

hands, “I sincerely implore Thy pardon, and confess that I am a great

sinner, but thou knowest that the Abbe de Villargeau is a much greater

sinner than I am.”

Cardinal Mazarin sent him once to compliment the English Ambassador on

his arrival. When he reached the hotel, an Englishman said to him,

“Milord, il est pret; my ladi, il n’est pas pret, friselire ses chevaux,

prendre patience.” The late King used to relate stories of this same

Boisrobert in a very whimsical manner.

The life which folks lead at Paris becomes daily more scandalous; I

really tremble for the city every time it thunders. Three ladies of

quality have just committed a monstrous imprudence. They have been

running after the Turkish Ambassador; they made his son drunk and kept

him with them three days; if they go on in this way even the Capuchins

will not be safe from them. The Turks must needs have a very becoming

notion of the conduct of ladies of quality in a Christian country. The

young Turk is said to have told Madame de Polignac, who was one of the

three ladies, “Madame, your reputation has reached Constantinople, and I

see that report has only done you justice.” The Ambassador, it is said,

is very much enraged with his son, and has enjoined him to keep his

adventure profoundly a secret, because he would risk the top of his head

on his return to Constantinople if it were known that he had associated

with Christian women. It is to be feared that the young man will get

safely out of France. Madame de Polignac has fleeced all the young men

of quality here. I do not know how her relations and those of her

husband choose to suffer her to lead so libertine a life. But all shame

is extinct in France, and everything is turned topsy-turvy.

It is very unfortunate that noblemen like the Elector-Palatine John

William should suffer themselves to be governed by the priesthood;

nothing but evil can result from it. He would do much better if he would

follow the advice of able statesmen, and throw his priest into the

Necker. I would advise him to do so, and I think I should advise him

well.

I cannot conceive why the Duke Maximilian (brother of George I. of

England)

[Prince Maximilian of Hanover, the second brother of George I., had,

after the death of his brother, Frederick Augustus, certain rights

over the Bishopric of Osnaburgh; love and his monks caused him to

embrace the catholic faith.]

changed his religion, for he had very little faith in general; none of

his relations solicited him to do so, and he was induced by no personal

interest.

I have heard a story of this Prince, which does him little honour. I

have been told that he complained to the Emperor of his mother, who bred

him tenderly, but who had not sent him eight thousand crowns which he had

asked her for. This is abominable, and he can hope for happiness neither

in this nor in the next world; I can never forgive him for it. The first

idea of this must have originated with Father Wolff, who has also excited

him against Prince Edward Augustus.--[Maximilian contested the Bishopric

of Osnaburgh with his younger brother.]--What angers me most with this

cursed monk is, that he will not suffer Duke Maximilian to have a single

nobleman about him; he will only allow him to be approached by beggars

like himself.

ETEXT EDITOR’S BOOKMARKS

A pious Capuchin explained her dream to her

Always has a fictitious malady in reserve

Art of satisfying people even while he reproved their requests

Asked the King a hundred questions, which is not the fashion

Bad company spoils good manners

Because the Queen has only the rinsings of the glass

But all shame is extinct in France

Duc de Grammont, then Ambassador, played the Confessor

Duplicity passes for wit, and frankness is looked upon as folly

Even doubt whether he believes in the existence of a God

Exclaimed so long against high head-dresses

Follies and superstitions as the rosaries and other things

Formerly the custom to swear horridly on all occasions

Frequent and excessive bathing have undermined her health

Great filthiness in the interior of their houses

Great things originated from the most insignificant trifles

He had good natural wit, but was extremely ignorant

He always slept in the Queen’s bed

He was a good sort of man, notwithstanding his weaknesses

Her teeth were very ugly, being black and broken (Queen)

Honour grows again as well as hair

I thought I should win it, and so I lost it

I never take medicine but on urgent occasions

I wished the husband not to be informed of it

I have seldom been at a loss for something to laugh at

I am unquestionably very ugly

I had a mind, he said, to commit one sin, but not two

I formed a religion of my own

If I should die, shall I not have lived long enough?

It is an unfortunate thing for a man not to know himself

It was not permitted to argue with him

Jewels and decoration attract attention (to the ugly)

Like will to like

Louis XIV. scarcely knew how to read and write

Made his mistresses treat her with all becoming respect

My husband proposed separate beds

No man more ignorant of religion than the King was

Nobility becoming poor could not afford to buy the high offices

Not lawful to investigate in matters of religion

Old Maintenon

Only your illegitimate daughter

Original manuscripts of the Memoirs of Cardinal Retz

Provided they are talked of, they are satisfied

Robes battantes for the purpose of concealing her pregnancy

Seeing myself look as ugly as I really am (in a mirror)

She never could be agreeable to women

Since becoming Queen she had not had a day of real happiness

So great a fear of hell had been instilled into the King

Soon tired of war, and wishing to return home (Louis XIV)

Stout, healthy girl of nineteen had no other sins to confess

Subject to frequent fits of abstraction

That what he called love was mere debauchery

The old woman (Madame Maintenon)

Throw his priest into the Necker

To tell the truth, I was never very fond of having children

To die is the least event of my life (Maintenon)

You never look in a mirror when you pass it

You are a King; you weep, and yet I go

Memoirs of the Court of Louis XIV. and of the Regency — Complete · 第 20 / 20 章