THE NEGRO IN THE FIELD OF INVENTION

There is no branch of technical and scientific industry in our country

that is at all comparable in scope and results with the business of

perfecting inventions. These constitute the basis on which nearly all

our great manufacturing enterprises are conducted, both as to the

machinery employed and the articles produced. So vast is the field

covered by inventors, and so industriously do they apply their talent

to it that patents for new and useful inventions are now being granted

them by our government at the rate of more than one hundred a day for

every day that the office is open for business. And when one considers

the enormous part played by American inventors in the economic,

industrial and financial development of our country, it becomes a

matter of importance to ascertain what share in this great work is

done by the American Negro.

The average American seems not to know that the Negro has contributed

very materially to this result. Not knowing it, he does not believe

it, and not believing it he easily advances to the mental attitude of

being ready to assert that the Negro has done absolutely nothing worth

while in the field of invention. This conclusion necessarily grows out

of the traditional attitude of the average American on the question of

the capacity of the Negro for high scientific and technical

achievement. This state of mind on the part of the general public is

not perceptibly changed by the well-authenticated reports now and then

of meritorious inventions in many lines of experiment made by Negroes

in various parts of the country, notwithstanding the fact that these

reports are frequently made through channels that would seem to leave

nothing to doubt.

It has always been and presumably always will be difficult for truth

to outrun a falsehood. One instance of the way in which such false and

erroneous impressions of the Negro's capacity and achievement gain

currency and fix themselves in the public mind is shown sometimes in

the campaign methods of some politicians. One of these, a Marylander,

addressing a political gathering in his native State in behalf of his

own candidacy for Congress, a few years ago declared that the Negro

was not entitled to vote because he had never evinced sufficient

capacity to justify such a privilege, and that not one of the race had

ever yet reached the dignity of an inventor. It is not easy to

understand how a gentleman of the requisite qualifications to

represent an intelligent constituency acceptably in the Congress of

the United States could so palpably pervert the truth in a matter on

which he could so easily have rightly informed himself. At the time

when this statement was made, 1903, in Talbot County, Maryland, there

was on the shelves of the Library of Congress a book[15] containing a

chapter on "The Negro as an Inventor," and citing several hundred

patents granted by our government for inventions by Negroes. And still

another instance is that of a leading newspaper of Richmond, which

some time ago published the bold statement that of the many thousands

of patents granted to the inventors in this country annually not a

single patent had ever been granted to a colored man. These and

similar general statements which make no mention of exceptions admit

of but one interpretation. The wish may be father to the thought, but

the truth is not father to their words.

In the cause of truth it is very gratifying to the writer to be able

to show that notwithstanding the frequency and the persistency of

these misrepresentations, the facts are gradually coming to the front

to prove that the Negro not only now but in the remote past exhibited

considerable of the inventive genius which has been so instrumental in

the development of our country. In the ordinary course of

investigation along this particular line the official records of the

U. S. Patent Office must necessarily be referred to in order to

ascertain the number of patents granted either for a given class of

inventors, or to a certain geographical group of citizens, as by State

or nationality, or for a given period of time. But, voluminous as are

these records, and various as are the items they cover, they make

almost no disclosure of the fact that any of the multitude of patents

that are granted daily are for inventions by Negroes. The solitary

exception to this statement is the case of Henry Blair, of Maryland,

to whom were granted two patents on corn harvesters, one in 1834, the

other in 1836. In both cases he is designated in the official records

as a "colored man." To the uninformed this very exception might appear

conclusive, but it is not. It has long been the fixed policy of the

Patent Office to make no distinction as to race in the records of

patents granted to American citizens. All American inventors stand on

a level before the Patent Office. It may perhaps be an open question

whether, in the enforcement of such a policy, the advantages outweigh

the disadvantages as it regards colored inventors.

In the period preceding the Civil War mechanical inventions of merit

by colored persons were not numerous, so far as the investigation has

shown, but this was also true of all classes of inventors of that

time. With the great majority of slaves the question uppermost among

them was how to effect their freedom, and those who were fortunately

gifted with an active intelligence and some vision were, for the most

part, using their mental faculties to devise some plan to interest

others in their efforts for emancipation. This situation would

obviously lend itself more readily to developing literary talent and

oratorical ability than to producing machinists, engineers or

inventors. Hence the preachers and teachers and orators of the colored

race that here and there rose above the masses greatly outnumbered the

inventors. But it should be remembered also in this connection that in

the period just mentioned the mechanical industries of the South were

carried on mostly by slaves, and that bits of history gathered here

and there show that many of the simple mechanical contrivances of the

day were devised by the Negro in his effort to minimize the exactions

of his daily toil. None of these inventions were patented by the

United States as being the inventions of slaves; and it is quite

conceivable that some inventions of value perfected by this class will

be forever lost sight of through the attitude at that time of the

Federal Government on that subject. In 1858 Jeremiah S. Black,

Attorney-General of the United States, confirmed a decision of the

Secretary of the Interior, on appeal from the Commissioner of Patents,

refusing to grant a patent on an invention by a slave, either to the

slave as the inventor, or to the master of the latter, on the ground

that, not being a citizen, the slave could neither contract with the

government nor assign his invention to his master.[16]

Another instance of this sort was an invention on the plantation owned

by Jefferson Davis, of Mississippi, President of the late Confederate

States. The Montgomerys, father and sons, were attached to this

family, and some of them made mechanical appliances which were adopted

for use on the estate. One of them in particular, Benjamin T.

Montgomery, father of Isaiah T. Montgomery, founder of the prosperous

Negro Colony of Mound Bayou, Mississippi, invented a boat propeller.

It attracted the favorable attention of Jefferson Davis himself, who

unsuccessfully tried to have it patented. The writer is informed by a

recent letter from Isaiah T. Montgomery that it was Jefferson Davis's

failure in this matter that led him to recommend to the Confederate

Congress the law passed by that body favorable to the grant of patents

for the inventions of slaves. The law was:

"And be it further enacted, that in case the original inventor or

discoverer of the art, machine or improvement for which a patent

is solicited is a slave, the master of such slave may take an

oath that the said slave was the original; and on complying with

the requisites of the law shall receive a patent for said

discovery or invention, and have all the rights to which a

patentee is entitled by law."[17]

The national ban on patents for the inventions of slaves did not, of

course, attach itself to the inventions made by "free persons of

color" residing in this country. So that when James Forten, of

Philadelphia, who lived from 1766 to 1842, perfected a new device for

handling sails, he had no difficulty in obtaining a patent for his

invention, nor in deriving from it comfortable financial support for

himself and family during the remainder of his life.

This was also true in the case of Norbert Rillieux, a colored Creole

of Louisiana. In 1846 he invented and patented a vacuum pan which in

its day revolutionized to a large extent the then known method of

refining sugar. This invention with others which he also patented are

known to have aided very materially in developing the sugar industry

of Louisiana. Rillieux was a machinist and an engineer of fine

reputation in his native State, and displayed remarkable talent for

scientific work on a large scale. Among his other known achievements

was the development of a practicable scheme for a system of sewerage

for the city of New Orleans, but he here met his handicap of color

through the refusal of the authorities to accord to him such an honor

as would be evidenced by the acceptance and adoption of his plan.[18]

Who knows but that the city of New Orleans might have been able to

write a different chapter in the history of its health statistics on

the Yellow Fever peril if its prejudices had not been allowed to

dominate its prophecy?

[Illustration: _N. Rillieux_

_Evaporating Pan._

_No. 4,879_

_Patented Dec. 10, 1846_

_Sheet 3-4 Sheets_]

Let us turn now to a consideration of those inventions made by colored

inventors since the war period, and at a time when no obstacles stood

in the way. With the broadening of their industrial opportunities, and

the incentive of a freer market for the products of their talent, it

was thought that the Negroes would correspondingly exhibit inventive

genius, and the records abundantly prove this to have been true. But

how have these records been made available? It has already been shown

that no distinction as to race appears in the public records of the

Patent Office, and for this reason the Patent Office has been

repeatedly importuned to set in motion some scheme of inquiry that

would disclose, as far as is possible, how many patents have been

granted by the government for the inventions of Negroes. This has been

done by the Patent Office on two different occasions. The first

official inquiry was made by the Office at the request of the United

States Commission to the Paris Exposition of 1900, and the second at

the request of the Pennsylvania Commission conducting the Emancipation

Exposition at Philadelphia in 1913. In both instances the Patent

Office sent out several thousand circular letters directed to

prominent patent lawyers, large manufacturing firms, and to newspapers

of wide circulation, asking them to inform the Commissioner of Patents

of any authentic instances known by them to be such, in which the

patents granted by the Office had been for inventions by Negroes.

The replies were numerous, interesting and informing. Every one of the

several thousand that came to the Patent Office was turned over to the

writer who, in his capacity as an employee of that department, very

willingly assumed the additional task of assorting and recording them,

verifying when possible the information presented, and extending the

correspondence personally when this proved to be necessary either to

trace a clew or clinch a fact. The information obtained in this way

showed, first, that a very large number of colored inventors had

consulted patent lawyers on the subject of getting patents on their

inventions, but were obliged finally to abandon the project for lack

of funds; secondly, that many colored inventors had actually obtained

patents for meritorious inventions, but the attorneys were unable to

give sufficient data to identify the cases specifically, inasmuch as

they had kept no identifying record of the same; thirdly, that many

patents had been taken out by the attorneys for colored clients who

preferred not to have their racial identity disclosed because of the

probably injurious effect this might have upon the commercial value of

their patents; and lastly, that more than a thousand authentic cases

were fully identified by name of inventor, date and number of patent

and title of invention, as being the patents granted for inventions of

Negroes. These patents represent inventions in nearly every branch of

the industrial arts--in domestic devices, in mechanical appliances, in

electricity through all its wide range of uses, in engineering skill

and in chemical compounds. The fact is made quite clear that the names

obtained were necessarily only a fractional part of the number granted

patents.

It developed through these inquiries that some very important

industries now in operation on a large scale in our country are based

on the inventions of Negroes. Foremost among these is the gigantic

enterprise known as The United Shoe Machinery Company of Boston. In a

biographical sketch of its president, Mr. Sidney W. Winslow, a

multimillionaire,[19] it is related that he claims to have laid the

foundation of his immense fortune in the purchase of a patent for an

invention by a Dutch Guiana Negro named Jan E. Matzeliger. This

inventor was born in Dutch Guiana, September, 1852. His parents were a

native Negro woman and her husband, a Dutch engineer, who had been

sent there from Holland to direct the government construction works at

that place. As a very young man Matzeliger came to this country and

served an apprenticeship as a cobbler, first in Philadelphia and later

in Lynn, Massachusetts. The hardships which he suffered gradually

undermined his health and before being able to realize the full value

of his invention, he passed away in 1889 in the thirty-seventh year of

his age.

He invented a machine for lasting shoes. This was the first appliance

of its kind capable of performing all the steps required to hold a

shoe on its last, grip and pull the leather down around the heel,

guide and drive the nails into place and then discharge the completed

shoe from the machine. This patent when bought by Mr. Winslow was made

to form the nucleus of the great United Shoe Machinery Company, which

now operates on a capital stock of more than twenty million dollars,

gives regular employment to over 5,000 operatives, occupies with its

factories more than 20 acres of ground, and represents the

consolidation of over 40 subsidiary companies. The establishment and

maintenance of this gigantic business enterprise forms one of the

biggest items in the history of our country's industrial development.

Within the first twenty years following the formation of The United

Shoe Machinery Company, in 1890, the product of American shoe

manufacturers increased from $220,000,000 to $442,631,000, and during

the same period the export of American shoes increased from $1,000,000

to $11,000,000, the increase being traceable solely to the superiority

of the shoes produced by the new American machines, founded on the

Matzeliger type. The cost of shoes was reduced more than 50 per cent.

by these machines and the quality improved correspondingly. The wages

of workers greatly increased, the hours of labor diminished, and the

factory conditions surrounding the laborers immensely improved. The

improvement thus brought about in the quality and price of American

shoes has made the Americans the best shod people in the world.[20]

That invention will serve as Matzeliger's towering monument far beyond

our vision of years. Throughout all shoe-making districts of New

England and elsewhere the Matzeliger type of machine is well known,

and to this day it is frequently referred to in trade circles as the

"Nigger machine," the relic, perhaps, of a possible contemptuous

reference to his racial identity; and yet there were some newspaper

accounts of his life in which it was denied that he had Negro blood in

him. A certified copy of the death certificate of Matzeliger, which

was furnished the writer by William J. Connery, Mayor of Lynn, on Oct.

23, 1912, states that Matzeliger was a mulatto.

[Illustration: J. E. MATZELIGER

The Journal of Negro History, Volume 2, 1917 · 第 18 / 156 题