PEACEFULLY HE LIVED-–PEACEFULLY HE DIED!

And now, my dear children, I have but little more to say. It has

been a hard struggle for me to write much that I have written; for it

seemed like tearing open my heart. But the ardent desire that the

virtues of my husband should not die out as his name has done, and the

fear that, as one by one of those who knew and loved him, should be

laid in the grave, and the bare fact that he was murdered only remain,

a blush might tinge your cheeks, at the mention of his name, lest the

ancestor, who thus fell, might by his evil deeds have provoked his

untimely end. I have often felt, too, while penning these letters, it

is useless; my grandchildren will perhaps never even take the pains to

read them, and if read they may not be impressed by them or stimulated

to a single effort, to imitate the being I so much love and admire, and

whose blood still flows in their own veins.

One of the few friends to whom I communicated my intention to

write this sketch, and for whose opinion I have a high regard, wrote me

as follows:

“Do not suffer yourself to forget that when your grandchildren

shall have become old enough to understand what you write, the present

and the future will be the object of their interest, not the past and

the dead. They will be unlike humanity, if they take any interest, in

what so much interests you. I very much fear that your labors will

wholly fail of accomplishing the good your earnest and loving heart

intends.”

In the same letter he also expresses a fear that it will be

impossible for me to make any attempt of the kind which will not be a

very partial one. In reference to this, he says:

“The memory comes insensibly to dwell on all that was agreeable,

and to intensify it; impartiality ceases; and the almost certain result

is, a picture which all who read it, having known the object, see to be

colored by the hand of love.”

If I had not already written twelve or thirteen letters before

this damper to my efforts came to hand; I do not know that I would have

had the courage to proceed, and I am now gratified to see, in

reperusing the letters of condolence which we received after the death

of your grandfather, that they, no less than the public manifestations

of the community where he lived and died, corroborate what I have said

in relation to him. Of the forty-seven letters received from friends,

from every part of the country, there is but one opinion. All speak of

him as an uncommon man, whose loss is irreparable. I will copy a few

extracts from these letters, scarcely knowing, however, which to

select, so full they all are of praises of him, whose memory, I humbly

pray, his children may ever cherish as their richest earthly

inheritance.

A gentleman of Cincinnati writes: “After the first stunning

realization of the horrible crime of which your dear and universally

beloved husband has been the victim, we continue to ask ourselves, if

such a man is murdered, who can be safe? A man so kind, so just, so

gentle, so good. I never knew a man whose whole life and character

would have seemed a better guarantee against all violence, even of

feeling.”

A lady, who had passed the greater part of her life in St. Louis,

writes to my brother Henry, from “East Rockport.” She says, (after an

expression of her heart-felt sympathy for him, and for the bereaved

wife and child): “St. Louis has not been alone in her just indignation

and horror at the cruel and ruthless deed committed on one of her

principal streets; the bitter lament she so recently sent forth to all

parts of the country has been re-echoed back again by many hearts and

voices, that never knew our poor friend. May I not then, who have

known him from his early youth, be permitted to bear my testimony to

his many excellencies of character, so justly portrayed by his own

Pastor, and others, with whom he was associated? Yes! there is but one

voice on that subject, as there should be but one earnest wish, by all

who mourn this sad event, ‘May I die the death of the righteous, and

may my last end be like his.’ I know that on the face of the widowed

wife and her only child, there rests the expression of unutterable

sorrow, but her Maker is her husband, and her fatherless one, His

peculiar care. The cold grave does not contain the immortal spirit

that she saw contending in its agony for freedom from its clay casket,

but it has soared away forever to the fields of light and immortality.

May all with whom he has been associated, and all who shall hereafter

learn the history of his amiable character, of his serene, and exalted

piety, his peaceful conscience, and his martyr death, be so impressed

as to join themselves to the ‘followers of the Cross,’ and bear the

same noble testimony to the excellence of our holy religion that our

friend, Mr. Charless, has done.”

Another lady writes, from Cumberland, Penn., thus: “My heart

bleeds for you all, for well I know what a treasure you have lost. Few

persons beyond your family circle had a better opportunity of knowing

your beloved husband, and none, I venture to say, loved and admired him

more. The world at large knew and valued him as a noble Christian

gentleman, as a man of sterling integrity, and enlarged benevolence,

but who could understand all his excellence and all his loveliness, but

those who have been privileged, as I have so often been, to see him in

the sweet relations of husband and father, to bow with him at his

family altar, and to hear the fervent, yet humble, outpourings of the

Christian heart before the mercy seat? Ah! well do I remember how

tenderly, how sweetly, his petitions were wont to ascend for me, at the

time of my deep and overwhelming sorrow; and when about to leave his

hospitable roof, how affectionately he would commend the stricken one

to our heavenly Father’s gracious care. These remembrances will linger

about the heart as long as it throbs with life. Oh! sad, sad is the

thought that I shall no more hear that sweet voice pleading with our

Father God in behalf of the sorrowing ones, or for the Church of God,

so dear to his heart, or committing his loved ones into his gracious

care; while, with lowly meekness, he confessed and bewailed his sins,

and plead for pardon with a childlike love and trust in our blessed

Saviour. But oh! delightful thought, his prayers are now turned to

praise.”

I will copy a part of a letter, from a gentleman in the city of

New York, to show what kind of an impression your dear grandfather made

upon strangers.

“June 4, 1859."

“Very dear Madam: Although a stranger to you, I cannot repress

the expression of the heart-felt sympathy of myself and my whole family

for you in your late terrible bereavement. Language is totally at

fault in its poverty to convey what we feel, or give words that shall

comfort you in your heavy affliction. Our acquaintance with your dear

husband was recent and short, but it was long enough to endear him to

our hearts in no ordinary way. We had gone to the house of God in

company, and taken sweet counsel together. We had mingled our songs of

praise around the domestic altar, and at the same holy place had poured

out our united petitions to God for his blessing on our dear families,

as well as on the cause of our divine Master. Indeed, I can truly say

that our intercourse with your dear husband was all that was sweet and

refreshing to the Christian’s heart, and time can never efface the

delightful impression he left in our family when he took an

affectionate leave of us all in order to join you and his dear

daughter, and grandchildren. Every look and every word as is fresh as

yesterday, and his sweet memory will be cherished by Mrs. S. and

myself, and all our children, every one of whom became warmly attached

to him.

“I feel that I am doing that which will re-open the bleeding

wound, but I cannot help it, as my own emotions must have the relief

which this note of sympathy only partially affords. O, how unspeakably

dear to us is the thought of his readiness for the great change, and

that he is now walking those golden streets, and basking in the smiles

of his Saviour. And how consoling the many sweet assurances of our

heavenly Father that he doth not willingly afflict, that all things

work together for good to them that love God, and that as our day is,

so shall our strength be.”

In explanation of your grandfather having been a guest of the

gentleman who wrote this letter, and yet a stranger to him, it may be

of interest to you to know, that in the spring of 1859, just before the

return of your dear mother and yourselves to St. Louis, from your

Southern home, he paid a short visit to the city of New York, to attend

to some business for the Mechanics’ Bank, which brought him in contact

with Mr. S., “President of the Bank of the Republic,” who gave him a

pressing invitation to pass the Sabbath day with him, at his country

seat, on the Hudson river. He accepted the invitation, accompanied his

new made friend on Saturday afternoon, and returned Monday morning; and

was thus made acquainted with a charming family, of whom he several

times spoke in terms of admiration and affection.

A gentleman, residing in the interior of the State of Missouri,

says, in a letter to my brother Taylor: “I cannot in justice to my own

feelings refrain from expressing to you the deep, deep grief I felt at

the loss of our dear friend, Mr. Charless. In all my intercourse with

the world I can safely say that he was the purest and best man I have

ever known. Thousands have lost their best friend, society one of its

brightest ornaments, and his family-–Great God, how can their loss be

described. I have been proud for twenty years to claim him as my

friend, and if I had no other reason for thinking well of human nature,

a knowledge of his character would be sufficient. He was a credit to

human nature, and I never, sir, expect to meet his equal again in all

that is essential to make a good and true man.”

Another gentleman, who dates his letter, Sarcoxie, June 10, in

addressing the same brother, after offering his sincere condolence to

him, and through him to the immediate family of the deceased, says: “My

relations with Mr. Charless it is true were mostly of a business

character, yet a relation of this kind of twenty years standing, could

not exist with such a man without producing feelings of a kindly

character. Such I entertain for him, though I never saw his face; and

I am persuaded that he entertained similar feelings toward me. I shall

ever cherish his memory as one of the best friends I ever had in my

life.” Before closing his letter he requests a “lithograph likeness”

of your grandfather, which was sent him.

What a rare testimonial is this! Known only as a business man,

without ever having seen his face.

Your mother, in reading “Macaulay’s Essays,” a few days since,

was struck with his description of the late Lord Holland, as being so

much like her father. She pointed it out to me, and it so exactly

accords with my views of him, also, that I think I may be excused by

transferring it to this letter, for your perusal. He says of the

expression of Lord Holland’s face, that it was “singularly compounded

of sense, humor, courage, openness, a strong will and a sweet temper,”

and that he had the “most gracious and interesting countenance that was

ever lighted up by the mingled luster of intelligence and benevolence.

As it was with the faces of the men of this noble family (referring to

Lord Holland and his ancestors) so was it with their minds. Nature had

done much for them all. She had moulded them all of that clay, of

which she is most sparing. To all she had given strong reason and a

sharp wit; a quick relish for every physical and intellectual

enjoyment; constitutional intrepidity, and that frankness by which

constitutional intrepidity is generally accompanied; spirits which

nothing could depress; tempers easy, generous and placable; and that

genial courtesy which has its seat in the heart, and of which

artificial politeness is only a faint and cold imitation. Such a

disposition is the richest inheritance that ever was entailed on any

family.”

Rev. Mr. Cowen, of Carondelet, on the Sabbath of June 12, 1859,

preached to his congregation from the text, “He being dead yet

speaketh.” After giving an exposition of the text, he calls the

attention of his congregation to the lessons of instruction “which this

solemn providence” (alluding to the sad death of your grandfather)

teaches:

1st. “The death of Mr. Charless teaches us the mysteriousness of

God’s providence.” “In the calamity, dear hearers, which has removed

from our midst one of the best men of this, or any previous age of the

world, and overwhelmed so many in deep sorrow, we are pointed to the

cruel and murderous hand of the assassin, but this was only the

proximate cause of his sudden and violent death. There is a high and

remote cause to which we must look, if we would find the true source of

this event, which has thrilled the heart of this whole community. That

cause, dear hearers, is the providence of God.”

Rev. Dr. Palmer of New Orleans, whom you recollect was to be our

guest when in St. Louis, in June, 1859, told me that on that Sabbath

day, when so many tearful eyes were looking for the last time upon the

placid countenance of the beloved, who lay so still and cold in his

coffin, he saw at the hotel where he was staying, among others who were

lamenting the untimely end of Mr. Charless, men of rough appearance,

who would one moment use the most horrible oaths of vengeance against

the perpetrator of the bloody dead, and the next, their voices

softening with expressions of tender regret, big tears were seen

streaming down their cheeks, showing, as Dr. Palmer said, “how they

loved the man from whom, in a moral point of view, they were so far

separated, and the extraordinary influence of his life and character.”

Among the many copies that were sent to us of “the Resolutions,”

which were passed by the various associations of St. Louis, in honor of

this dear friend, I will extract but a portion of one:

“Resolved, That in the death of JOSEPH CHARLESS, Esq., we, as

representatives of “The Home of the Friendless,” are called to grieve

for the loss of our First Patron. He whose benefactions, stimulated

into action the earliest impulses that led to the establishing of this

institution, and whose sympathizing heart and ready hand followed us to

the end of his life. Truly of him it may be said, ‘The blessing of him

that was ready to perish came upon him, and he caused the widow’s heart

to sing for joy.’”

In conclusion, my dear children, I am reminded as I often have

been while writing these letters, that my husband was not fond of

praise, and that he particularly disliked any approach to it from his

wife, for he thought it almost as unbecoming in her to extol his

virtues as it would have been to speak in praise of her own. He was,

as I have said, an humble man, for he seemed never to forget that he

had been redeemed from the curse of a broken law and was indebted to

God, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, for all that he had or was. And

to God truly does the glory belong! Nature had done much for him, but

Grace far more. And while, my dear children, I would again and again

point you to your noble grandfather as an example worthy of your

imitation, I would more earnestly direct your attention higher still,

even to the Great Exemplar whom he followed at so great a distance.

Attempt to compare any human standard, however exalted to this, and it

wanes until it ceases to be seen before the dazzling purity of the Sun

of Righteousness! Man, although he was originally made pure, has

fallen very low in the scale of moral being, on account of sin. And

notwithstanding he may by nature be endowed with many amiable qualities

and many excellencies of character, the atmosphere of this sinful world

is not favorable to their proper development, so that the virtuous and

happy youth, gifted as he may be with intellectual capacity, and having

ever so large a share of moral courage, may yet not be able to resist

evil; and at last may become a bad, and, consequently, a discontented

man. And it is certain, that, although he may live above reproach

before his fellows, and achieve wonders in his career through life, he

can never be noted for true moral excellence without Christianity.

And now, my dear, very dear children, I am done. But I linger in

saying, farewell! Oh, that you all, “children, and children’s

children, even to the third and fourth generation,” may be enabled to

give your hearts away, in early life, to that blessed Saviour, who

alone is able to fit you for living and for dying, who alone can

effectually soothe your sorrows, sweeten every earthly enjoyment, and

impart to you, in the midst of the cares, trials, and dangers of life,

that calm confidence so beautifully expressed by David, “The Lord is my

Shepherd, I shall not want.”

That you may be guided by the precepts of God’s Holy Word, which

is so faithfully taught you from week to week by your own sweet mother,

my precious grandchildren, and that the dews of Divine Grace may distil

from heaven upon you, making you true men and women, that you may live

the life of the righteous, and at last be found among those who have

washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb, is,

and ever will be, the sincere and earnest prayer of,

A Biographical Sketch of the Life and Character of Joseph Charless In a Series of Letters to his Grandchildren · 第 28 / 32 题