NICOLO PAGANINI.

From a drawing by Ingres in Rome, 1818. Engraved by Calamatta.

Paganini in his thirty-fourth year.

]

The year 1842 was an important date in Berlioz’s career. From that time

his life was a divided one. Misunderstood in his own country,

disheartened by his unsuccessful attempts to win the heart of the great

public, inconsolable for the failure of _Benvenuto_ which closed to him

forever the doors of the Academy of Music, he resolved to undertake an

artistic tour through Europe, and began with Belgium in the latter part

of the year 1842. He met with rather more success there than in France,

though he was still the subject of heated discussion. He took with him a

decidedly mediocre singer, Mademoiselle Martin Recio, who had made a

failure at the Opéra, and had managed to attach herself to him. He

married her later, soon after the death of Miss Smithson, from whom he

had been separated; but he was no happier in his second marriage than in

his first; his first wife drank, his second made unjustifiable

pretensions as a singer, which always exasperated him. After this little

excursion to Belgium, Berlioz determined to try his fortune in Germany,

where already some of his works had found their way; from this time

onward, his life was nothing more than a series of journeys through

France and foreign countries. His first grand tour was through northern

Germany. At Leipsic he saw Mendelssohn, whom he met on the best of

terms, forgetting all about their youthful quarrels; at Dresden he

inspired an equal devotion on the part of Richard Wagner, who received

him as a brother and treated him as a master; at Berlin he was no less

warmly welcomed by Meyerbeer, who recruited the necessary artists for

him and enabled him to direct a part of his _Requiem_.

On his return to Paris he organized, first, a monster festival at the

Exposition of the Products of Industry, in August, 1844, then four grand

concerts at the Circus of the Champs Elysées, early in 1845; but these

gigantic concerts which it had always been his aim to direct, brought

him no profit. Not discouraged by this, however, he gave grand concerts

at Marseilles and at Lyons, the modest success of which was due partly

to curiosity, partly to surprise. After that he went to Austria, Bohemia

and Hungary; this tour was scarcely finished when he rushed off to Lille

to organize a grand festival there on the occasion of the inauguration

of the Northern railroad. Finally in the summer of 1846 he returned to

Paris, and after having given a magnificent performance of his _Requiem_

in the Saint Eustache church, he decided to bring before the public his

most important work, _The Damnation of Faust_. The first performance

took place on December 6, before a small audience. The solos were sung

by Roger, Hermann, Leon, Henri, and Madame Duflôt-Maillard, who had no

better comprehension of the music than the public. The second

performance was given on Sunday the 20th, before an equally small house,

with a tenor who had to omit the _Invocation to Nature_. This convinced

Berlioz that he was still far from having conquered his own country. He

departed for Russia, deeply wounded by the indifference of his

countrymen.

Some of his Paris friends had clubbed together to furnish him the means

to go to St. Petersburg, whence he had received some brilliant offers.

He achieved the greatest success there, with musicians as well as with

the public, and the fact of his having formerly befriended Glinka at

Paris had its effect in enlisting sympathies for him in Russia. On his

way back he stopped at Berlin, where the _Damnation of Faust_ was given

with little enough appreciation, but where he received recognition from

the sovereign and the princess of Prussia. When he got back again to

Paris, crowned with laurels, and with money enough to settle all the

debts incurred by the performance of the _Damnation of Faust_ at the

_Opéra Comique_, he worked hard to get the appointment at the Opéra of

Duponchel and Roqueplan, who were talking of an immediate revival of

_Benvenuto Cellini_, of mounting _la Nonne sanglante_, etc. Berlioz

succeeded in getting them nominated directors, through the aid of the

Bertins, but they no sooner had the official notice in their pockets

than they utterly ignored Berlioz. The latter understood that he was

holding a restraint upon them, and since, as he said, he was accustomed

to this sort of proceedings, he took himself off to London in order to

rid them of his troublesome presence. The affair of the Drury Lane

concerts, unwisely entered into with the eccentric conductor Julien,

terminated in bankruptcy, and the Revolution which followed in 1848

would have left Berlioz without a sou had not Victor Hugo and Louis

Blanc obtained for the sworn disciple of the romantic school the humble

post of librarian at the Conservatoire.

In August, 1848, Berlioz experienced one of the keenest sorrows of his

life in the loss of his father. He went to Grenoble to attend his

father’s funeral, and in his Mémoires he gives a most touching account

of the sad visit. It was about this time that his little _Chœur de

Bergers_ was given under the pseudonym of Pierce Ducré, at the concerts

of the Philharmonic Society, Saint Cecilia hall, Chaussée d’Antin. In

1852 his _Benvenuto_ was given with great success at Weimar under the

fervent direction of Liszt, but the next year the same opera utterly

failed in London, where the Italians, said Berlioz, conspired to ruin

it. By “Italians” Berlioz meant the orchestral conductor Costa and his

party. Berlioz had accepted the preceding year the leadership of the New

Philharmonic, and had made by his success, and attacks, a bitter enemy

of the leader of the old _Philharmonic Society_.

[Illustration:

Famous composers and their works, Vol. 3 · 第 105 / 128 题