VI.

On Monday night, the eleventh day of May, in the thirty-third year of

the State of West Virginia, the judge of the criminal court of Gullmore

county, and the judge of the circuit court of Gullmore county were to

meet together for the purpose of deciding two matters,--one relating to

the trial of Moseby Allen, the retiring sheriff, for embezzling funds

of the county, amounting to thirty thousand dollars, and the other, an

action pending in the circuit court, wherein the State of West Virginia,

at the relation of Jacob Wade, was seeking to recover this sum from the

bondsmen of Allen. In neither of the two cases was there any serious

doubt as to the facts. It seemed that it was customary for the retiring

sheriff to retain an office in the court building after the installation

of his successor, and continue to attend to the unfinished business of

the county until all his settlements had been made, and until all the

matters relating to his term of office had been finally wound up and

administered.

In accordance with this custom, Moseby Allen, after the expiration of

his term, had continued in his office in a quasi-official capacity, in

order to collect back taxes and settle up all matters carried over from

his regular term.

It appeared that during Allen's term of office the county had built a

court-house, and had ordered certain levies for the purpose of raising

the necessary funds. The first of the levies had been collected by

Allen, and paid over by him to the contractors, as directed by the

county court. The remaining levies had not been collected during his

term, but had been collected by the new sheriff immediately after his

installation. This money, amounting to some thirty thousand dollars,

had been turned over to Allen upon his claim that it grew out of the

unfinished affairs of his term, and that, therefore, he was entitled to

its custody. He had said to the new sheriff that the levy upon which it

had been raised was ordered during his term, and the work for which it

was to be paid all performed, and the bonds of the county issued, while

he was active sheriff, and that he believed it was a part of the matters

which were involved in his final settlements. Jacob Wade, then sheriff,

believing that Allen was in fact the proper person to rightly administer

this fund, and knowing that his bond to the county was good and would

cover all his official affairs, had turned the entire fund over to him,

and paid no further attention to the matter.

It appeared that, at the end of the year, Moseby Allen had made all of

his proper and legitimate settlements fully and satisfactorily, and

had accounted to the proper authorities for every dollar that had

been collected by him during his term of office, but had refused and

neglected to account for the money which he had received from Wade. When

approached upon the subject, he had said plainly that he had used this

money in unfortunate speculations and could not return it. The man had

made no effort to check the storm of indignation that burst upon him;

he firmly refused to discuss the matter, or to give any information in

regard to it. When arrested, he had expressed no surprise, and had gone

to the jail with the officer. At the trial, his attorney had simply

waited until the evidence had been introduced, and had then arisen and

moved the court to direct a verdict of not guilty, on the ground that

Allen, upon the facts shown, had committed no crime punishable under the

statutes of West Virginia.

The court had been strongly disposed to overrule this motion without

stopping to consider it, but the attorney had insisted that a memorandum

which he handed up would sustain his position, and that without mature

consideration the judge ought not to force him into the superior

court, whereupon his Honor, Ephraim Haines, had taken the matter under

advisement until morning.

In the circuit court the question had been raised that Allen's bond

covered only those matters which arose by virtue of his office, and that

this fund was not properly included. Whereupon the careful judge of that

court had adjourned to consider.

It was almost nine o'clock when the Honorable Ephraim Haines walked into

the library to consult with his colleague of the civil court. He

found that methodical jurist seated before a pile of reports, with his

spectacles far out on the end of his nose,--an indication, as the said

Haines well knew, that the said jurist had arrived at a decision, and

was now carefully turning it over in his mind in order to be certain

that it was in spirit and truth the very law of the land.

"Well, Judge," said Haines, "have you flipped the penny on it, and if

so, who wins?"

The man addressed looked up from his book and removed his spectacles. He

was an angular man, with a grave analytical face.

"It is not a question of who wins, Haines," he answered; "it is a

question of law. I was fairly satisfied when the objection was first

made, but I wanted to be certain before I rendered my decision. I have

gone over the authorities, and there is no question about the matter.

The bondsmen of Allen are not liable in this action."

"They are not!" said Haines, dropping his long body down into a chair.

"It is public money, and the object of the bond is certainly to cover

any defalcations."

"This bond," continued the circuit judge, "provides for the faithful

discharge, according to law, of the duties of the office of sheriff

during his continuance in said office. Moseby Allen ceased to be sheriff

of this county the day his successor was installed, and on that day this

bond ceased to cover his acts. This money was handed over by the lawful

sheriff to a man who was not then an officer of this county. Moseby

Allen had no legal right to the custody of this money. His duties as

sheriff had ceased, his official acts had all determined, and there was

no possible way whereby he could then perform an official act that would

render his bondsmen liable. The action pending must be dismissed. The

present sheriff, Wade, is the one responsible to the county for this

money. His only recourse is an action of debt, or assumpsit, against

Allen individually, and as Allen is notoriously insolvent, Wade and his

bondsmen will have to make up this deficit."

"Well," said Haines, "that is hard luck."

"No," answered the judge, "it is not luck at all, it is law. Wade

permitted himself to be the dupe of a shrewd knave, and he must bear the

consequences."

"You can depend upon it," said the Honorable Ephraim Haines, criminal

judge by a political error, "that old Allen won't get off so easy with

me. The jury will convict him, and I will land him for the full term."

"I was under the impression," said the circuit judge, gravely, "that a

motion had been made in your court to direct an acquittal on the ground

that no crime had been committed."

"It was," said Haines, "but of course it was made as a matter of form,

and there is nothing in it."

"Have you considered it?"

"What is the use? It is a fool motion."

"Well," continued the judge, "this matter comes up from your court

to mine on appeal, and you should be correct in your ruling. What

authorities were cited?"

"Here is the memorandum," said the criminal judge, "you can run down the

cases if you want to, but I know it is no use. The money belonged to the

county and old Allen embezzled it,--that is admitted."

To this the circuit judge did not reply. He took the memorandum which

Randolph Mason had prepared for Allen, and which the local attorney

had submitted, and turned to the cases of reports behind him. He was a

hard-working, conscientious man, and not least among his vexatious cares

were the reckless decisions of the Honorable Ephraim Haines.

The learned judge of the criminal court put his feet on the table and

began to whistle. When at length wearied of this intellectual diversion,

he concentrated all the energy of his mammoth faculties on the highly

cultured pastime of sharpening his penknife on the back of the Code.

At length the judge of the circuit court came back to the table, sat

down, and adjusted his spectacles. "Haines," he said slowly, "you will

have to sustain that motion."

"What!" cried the Honorable Ephraim, bringing the legs of his chair down

on the floor with a bang.

"That motion," continued the judge, "must be sustained. Moseby Allen has

committed no crime under the statutes of West Virginia."

"Committed no crime!" almost shouted the criminal jurist, doubling his

long legs up under his chair, "why, old Allen admits that he got this

money and spent it. He says that he converted it to his own use; that it

was not his money; that it belonged to the county. The evidence of the

State shows that he cunningly induced Wade to turn this money over to

him, saying that his bond was good, and that he was entitled to the

custody of the fund. The old rascal secured the possession of this money

by trickery, and kept it, and now you say he has committed no crime. How

in Satan's name do you figure it out?"

"Haines," said the judge, gravely, "I don't figure it out. The law

cannot be figured out. It is certain and exact. It describes perfectly

what wrongs are punishable as crimes, and exactly what elements

must enter into each wrong in order to make it a crime. All right of

discretion is taken from the trial court; the judge must abide by the

law, and the law decides matters of this nature in no uncertain terms."

"Surely," interrupted Haines, beginning to appreciate the gravity of the

situation, "old Allen can be sent to the penitentiary for this crime. He

is a rank, out and out embezzler. He stole this money and converted it

to his own use. Are you going to say that the crime of embezzlement is a

dead letter?"

"My friend," said the judge, "you forget that there is no equity in the

criminal courts. The crime of embezzlement is a pure creature of the

statute. Under the old common law there was no such crime. Consequently

society had no protection from wrongs of this nature, until this evil

grew to such proportions that the law-making power began by statute to

define this crime and provide for its punishment. The ancient English

statutes were many and varied, and, following in some degree thereafter,

each of the United States has its own particular statute, describing

this crime as being composed of certain fixed technical elements. This

indictment against Moseby Allen is brought under Section 19 of Chapter

145 of the Code of West Virginia, which provides: 'If any officer,

agent, clerk or servant of this State, or of any county, district,

school district or municipal corporation thereof, or of any incorporated

bank or other corporation, or any officer of public trust in this State,

or any agent, clerk or servant of such officer of public trust, or any

agent, clerk or servant of any firm or person, or company or association

of persons not incorporated, embezzle or fraudulently convert to his

own use, bullion, money, bank notes or other security for money, or

any effects or property of another person which shall have come to his

possession, or been placed under his care or management, by virtue of

his office, place or employment, he shall be guilty of larceny thereof.'

"This is the statute describing the offence sought to be charged. All

such statutes must be strictly construed. Applying these requisites of

the crime to the case before us, we find that Allen cannot be convicted,

for the reason that at the time this money was placed in his hands he

was not sheriff of Gullmore county, nor was he in any sense its agent,

clerk, or servant. And, second, if he could be said to continue an

agent, clerk, or servant of this county, after the expiration of his

term, he would continue such agent, clerk, or servant for the purpose

only of administering those matters which might be said to lawfully

pertain to the unfinished business of his office. This fund was in

no wise connected with such unfinished affairs, and by no possible

construction could he be said to be an agent, clerk, or servant of this

county for the purpose of its distribution or custody. Again, in order

to constitute such embezzlement, the money must have come into his

possession by virtue of his office. This could not be, for the reason

that he held no office. His time, had expired; Jacob Wade was sheriff,

and the moment Jacob Wade was installed, Allen's official capacity

determined, and he became a private citizen, with only the rights and

liabilities of such a citizen.

"Nor is he guilty of larceny, for the very evident reason that the

proper custodian, Wade, voluntarily placed this money in his hands, and

he received it under a _bona fide_ color of right."

The Honorable Ephraim Haines arose, and brought his ponderous fist down

violently on the table. "By the Eternal!" he said, "this is the cutest

trick that has been played in the two Virginias for a century. Moseby

Allen has slipped out of the clutches of the law like an eel."

"Ephraim," said the circuit judge, reproachfully, "this is no frivolous

matter. Moseby Allen has wrought a great wrong, by which many innocent

men will suffer vast injury, perhaps ruin. Such malicious cunning is

dangerous to society. Justice cannot reach all wrongs; its hands are

tied by the restrictions of the law. Why, under this very statute, one

who was _de facto_ an officer of the county or State, by inducing some

other officer to place in his hands funds to which he was not legally

entitled, could appropriate the funds so received with perfect impunity,

and without committing any crime or rendering his bondsmen liable. Thus

a clerk of the circuit court could use without criminal liability any

money, properly belonging to the clerk of the county court, or sheriff,

provided he could convince the clerk or sheriff that he was entitled to

its custody; and so with any officer of the State or county, and this

could be done with perfect ease where the officers were well known to

each other and strict business methods were not observed. Hence all the

great wrong and injury of embezzlement can be committed, and all the

gain and profit of it be secured, without violating the statute or

rendering the officer liable to criminal prosecution. It would seem

that the rogue must be stupid indeed who could not evade the crime of

embezzlement."

The man stopped, removed his spectacles, and closed them up in their

case. He was a painstaking, honest servant of the commonwealth, and,

like many others of the uncomplaining strong, performed his own duties

and those of his careless companion without murmur or comment or hope of

reward.

The Honorable Ephraim Haines arose and drew himself up pompously. "I

am glad," he said, "that we agree on this matter. I shall sustain this

motion."

The circuit judge smiled grimly. "Yes," he said, "it is not reason or

justice, but it is the law."

At twelve the following night Colonel Moseby Allen, ex-sheriff of the

county of Gullmore, now acquitted of crime by the commonwealth,

hurried across the border for the purpose of avoiding certain lawless

demonstrations on the part of his countrymen,--and of all his acts of

public service, this was the greatest.

The Strange Schemes of Randolph Mason · 第 46 / 53 题