CHAPTER IV.

Histiaeus, Tyrant of Miletus, removed to Persia.--The Government of

that City deputed to Aristagoras, who invades Naxos with the aid of

the Persians.--Ill Success of that Expedition.--Aristagoras resolves

upon Revolting from the Persians.--Repairs to Sparta and to Athens.--

The Athenians and Eretrians induced to assist the Ionians.--Burning of

Sardis.--The Ionian War.--The Fate of Aristagoras.--Naval Battle of

Lade.--Fall of Miletus.--Reduction of Ionia.--Miltiades.--His

Character.--Mardonius replaces Artaphernes in the Lydian Satrapy.--

Hostilities between Aegina and Athens.--Conduct of Cleomenes.--

Demaratus deposed.--Death of Cleomenes.--New Persian Expedition.

I. We have seen that Darius rewarded with a tributary command the

services of Grecian nobles during his Scythian expedition. The most

remarkable of these deputy tyrants was Histiaeus, the tyrant of

Miletus. Possessed of that dignity prior to his connexion with

Darius, he had received from the generosity of the monarch a tract of

land near the river Strymon, in Thrace, sufficing for the erection of

a city called Myrcinus. To his cousin, Aristagoras, he committed the

government of Miletus--repaired to his new possession, and employed

himself actively in the foundations of a colony which promised to be

one of the most powerful that Miletus had yet established. The site

of the infant city was selected with admirable judgment upon a

navigable river, in the vicinity of mines, and holding the key of

commercial communication between the long chain of Thracian tribes on

the one side, and the trading enterprise of Grecian cities on the

other. Histiaeus was describing the walls with which the ancient

cities were surrounded, when Megabazus, commander of the forces

intended to consummate the conquest of Thrace, had the sagacity to

warn the Persian king, then at Sardis, of the probable effects of the

regal donation. "Have you, sire, done wisely," said he, "in

permitting this able and active Greek to erect a new city in Thrace?

Know you not that that favoured land, abounding in mines of silver,

possesses, also, every advantage for the construction and equipment of

ships; wild Greeks and roving barbarians are mingled there, ripe for

enterprise--ready to execute the commands of any resolute and aspiring

leader! Fear the possibility of a civil war--prevent the chances of

the ambition of Histiaeus,--have recourse to artifice rather than to

force, get him in your power, and prevent his return to Greece."

Darius followed the advice of his general, sent for Histiaeus, loaded

him with compliments, and, pretending that he could not live without

his counsels, carried him off from his Thracian settlement to the

Persian capital of Susa. His kinsman, Aristagoras, continued to

preside over the government of Miletus, then the most haughty and

flourishing of the Ionian states; but Naxos, beneath it in power,

surpassed it in wealth; the fertile soil of that fair isle--its

numerous population--its convenient site--its abundant resources,

attracted the cupidity of Aristagoras; he took advantage of a civil

commotion, in which many of the nobles were banished by the people--

received the exiles--and, under the pretence of restoring them,

meditated the design of annexing the largest of the Cyclades to the

tyranny of Miletus.

He persuaded the traitorous nobles to suffer him to treat with

Artaphernes--successfully represented to that satrap the advantages of

annexing the gem of the Cyclades to the Persian diadem--and Darius,

listening to the advice of his delegate, sent two hundred vessels to

the invasion of Naxos (B. C. 501), under the command of his kinsman,

Megabates. A quarrel ensued, however, between the Persian general and

the governor of Miletus. Megabates, not powerful enough to crush the

tyrant, secretly informed the Naxians of the meditated attack; and,

thus prepared for the assault, they so well maintained themselves in

their city, that, after a siege of four months, the pecuniary

resources, not only of Megabates, but of Aristagoras, were exhausted,

and the invaders were compelled to retreat from the island.

Aristagoras now saw that he had fallen into the pit he had digged for

others: his treasury was drained--he had incurred heavy debts with the

Persian government, which condemned him to reimburse the whole expense

of the enterprise--he feared the resentment of Megabates and the

disappointment of Artaphernes--and he foresaw that his ill success

might be a reasonable plea for removing him from the government of

Miletus. While he himself was meditating the desperate expedient of a

revolt, a secret messenger from Histiaeus suddenly arrived at Miletus.

That wily Greek, disgusted with his magnificent captivity, had had

recourse to a singular expedient: selecting the most faithful of his

slaves, he shaved his scull, wrote certain characters on the surface,

and, when the hair was again grown, dismissed this living letter to

Aristagoras [264]. The characters commanded the deputy to commence a

revolt; for Histiaeus imagined that the quiet of Miletus was the

sentence of his exile.

II. This seasonable advice, so accordant with his own views, charmed

Aristagoras: he summoned the Milesians, and, to engage their zealous

assistance, he divested himself of the tyranny, and established a

republic. It was a mighty epoch that, for the stir of thought!--

everywhere had awakened a desire for free government and equal laws;

and Aristagoras, desirous of conciliating the rest of Ionia, assisted

her various states in the establishment of republican institutions.

Coes, the tyrant of Mitylene, perished by the hands of the people; in

the rest of Ionia, the tyrants were punished but by exile. Thus a

spark kindled the universal train already prepared in thought, and the

selfish ambition of Aristagoras forwarded the march of a revolution in

favour of liberty that embraced all the cities of Ionia. But

Aristagoras, evidently a man of a profound, though tortuous policy,

was desirous of engaging not only the colonies of Greece, but the

mother country also, in the great and perilous attempt to resist the

Persian. High above all the states of the elder Greece soared the

military fame of Sparta; and that people the scheming Milesian

resolved first to persuade to his daring project.

Trusting to no ambassador, but to his own powers of eloquence, he

arrived in person at Sparta. With a brazen chart of the world, as

then known, in his hand, he sought to inspire the ambition of

Cleomenes by pointing out the wide domains--the exhaustless treasures

of the Persian realm. He depreciated the valour of its people,

ridiculed their weapons, and urged him to the vast design of

establishing, by Spartan valour, the magnificent conquest of Asia.

The Spartans, always cold to the liberty of other states, were no less

indifferent to the glory of barren victories; and when Aristagoras too

honestly replied, in answer to a question of the king, that from the

Ionian sea to Susa, the Persian capital, was a journey of three

months, Cleomenes abruptly exclaimed, "Milesian, depart from Sparta

before sunset;--a march of three months from the sea!--the Spartans

will never listen to so frantic a proposal!" Aristagoras, not

defeated, sought a subsequent interview, in which he attempted to

bribe the king, who, more accustomed to bribe others than be bribed,

broke up the conference, and never afterward would renew it.

III. The patient and plotting Milesian departed thence to Athens

(B. C. 500): he arrived there just at the moment when the Athenian

ambassadors had returned from Sardis, charged with the haughty reply

of Artaphernes to the mission concerning Hippias. The citizens were

aroused, excited, inflamed; equally indignant at the insolence, and

fearful of the power, of the satrap. It was a favourable occasion for

Aristagoras!

To the imagination of the reader this passage in history presents a

striking picture. We may behold the great assembly of that lively,

high-souled, sensitive, and inflammable people. There is the Agora;

there the half-built temple to Aeacus;--above, the citadel, where yet

hang the chains of the captive enemy;--still linger in the ears of the

populace, already vain of their prowess, and haughty in their freedom,

the menace of the Persian--the words that threatened them with the

restoration of the exiled tyrant; and at this moment, and in this

concourse, we see the subtle Milesian, wise in the experience of

mankind, popular with all free states, from having restored freedom to

the colonies of Ionia--every advantage of foreign circumstance and

intrinsic ability in his favour,--about to address the breathless and

excited multitude. He rose: he painted, as he had done to Cleomenes,

in lively colours, the wealth of Asia, the effeminate habits of its

people--he described its armies fighting without spear or shield--he

invoked the valour of a nation already successful in war against hardy

and heroic foes--he appealed to old hereditary ties; the people of

Miletus had been an Athenian colony--should not the parent protect the

child in the greatest of all blessings--the right to liberty? Now he

entreats--now he promises,--the sympathy of the free, the enthusiasm

of the brave, are alike aroused. He succeeds: the people accede to

his views. "It is easier," says the homely Herodotus, "to gain (or

delude) a multitude than an individual; and the eloquence which had

failed with Cleomenes enlisted thirty thousand Athenians." [265]

IV. The Athenians agreed to send to the succour of their own

colonists, the Ionians, twenty vessels of war. Melanthius, a man of

amiable character and popular influence, was appointed the chief.

This was the true commencement of the great Persian war.

V. Thus successful, Aristagoras departed from Athens. Arriving at

Miletus, he endeavoured yet more to assist his design, by attempting

to arouse a certain colony in Phrygia, formed of Thracian captives

[266] taken by Megabazus, the Persian general. A great proportion of

these colonists seized the occasion to return to their native land--

baffled the pursuit of the Persian horse--reached the shore--and were

transported in Ionian vessels to their ancient home on the banks of

the Strymon. Meanwhile, the Athenian vessels arrived at Miletus,

joined by five ships, manned by Eretrians of Euboea, mindful of former

assistance from the Milesians in a war with their fellow-islanders,

the Chalcidians, nor conscious, perhaps, of the might of the enemy

they provoked.

Aristagoras remained at Miletus, and delegated to his brother the

command of the Milesian forces. The Greeks then sailed to Ephesus,

debarked at Coressus, in its vicinity, and, under the conduct of

Ephesian guides, marched along the winding valley of the Cayster--

whose rapid course, under a barbarous name, the traveller yet traces,

though the swans of the Grecian poets haunt its waves no more--passed

over the auriferous Mount of Tmolus, verdant with the vine, and

fragrant with the saffron--and arrived at the gates of the voluptuous

Sardis. They found Artaphernes unprepared for this sudden invasion--

they seized the city (B. C. 499).--the satrap and his troops retreated

to the citadel.

The houses of Sardis were chiefly built of reeds, and the same slight

and inflammable material thatched the roofs even of the few mansions

built of brick. A house was set on fire by a soldier--the flames

spread throughout the city. In the midst of the conflagration despair

gave valour to the besieged--the wrath of man was less fearful than

that of the element; the Lydians, and the Persians who were in the

garrison, rushed into the market-place, through which flowed the river

of Pactolus. There they resolved to encounter the enemy. The

invaders were seized with a sudden panic, possibly as much occasioned

by the rage of the conflagration as the desperation of the foe; and,

retiring to Mount Tmolus, took advantage of the night to retrace their

march along the valley of the Cayster.

VI. But the Ionians were not fated to return in safety: from the

borders of the river Halys a troop of Persians followed their retreat,

and overtaking them when the Ephesian territory was already gained,

defeated the Ionians with a great slaughter, amid which fell the

leader of the Eretrians.

The Athenians were naturally disappointed with the result of this

expedition. Returning home, they refused all the overtures of

Aristagoras to renew their incursions into Asia. The gallant Ionians

continued, however, the hostilities they had commenced against Darius.

They sailed to the Hellespont, and reduced Byzantium, with the

neighbouring cities. Their forces were joined by the Cyprians,

aroused against the Persian yoke by Onesilus, a bold usurper, who had

dethroned his brother, the prince of Salamis, in Cyprus; and the

conflagration of Sardis dazzling the Carians, hitherto lukewarm,

united to the Ionian cause the bulk of that hardy population. The

revolt now assumed a menacing and formidable aspect. Informed of

these events, Darius summoned Histiaeus: "The man," said he, "whom you

appointed to the government of Miletus has rebelled against me.

Assisted by the Ionians, whom I shall unquestionably chastise, he has

burnt Sardis. Had he your approbation? Without it would he have

dared such treason? Beware how you offend a second time against my

authority." Histiaeus artfully vindicated himself from the suspicions

of the king. He attributed the revolt of the Ionians to his own

absence, declared that if sent into Ionia he would soon restore its

inhabitants to their wonted submission, and even promised to render

the Island of Sardinia tributary to Persia.

VII. Deluded by these professions, Darius dismissed the tyrant of

Miletus, requiring only his return on the fulfilment of his promises.

Meanwhile, the generals of Darius pressed vigorously on the

insurgents. Against Onesilus, then engaged in reducing Amathus (the

single city in Cyprus opposed to him), Artybius, a Persian officer,

conducted a formidable fleet. The Ionians hastened to the succour of

their Cyprian ally--a battle ensued both by land and sea: in the

latter the Ionians defeated, after a severe contest, the Phoenician

auxiliaries of Persia--in the former, a treacherous desertion of some

of the Cyprian troops gave a victory to the Persian. The brave

Onesilus, who had set his fate upon the issue of the field, was among

the slain. The Persians proceeded to blockade, and ultimately to

regain, the Cyprian cities: of these, Soli, which withstood a siege of

five months, proffered the most obdurate resistance; with the

surrender of that gallant city, Cyprus once more, after a year of

liberty, was subjected to the dominion of the great king.

This success was increased by the reduction of several towns on the

Hellespont, and two signal defeats over the Carians (B. C. 498), in

the last of which, the Milesians, who had joined their ally, suffered

a prodigious loss. The Carians, however, were not subdued, and in a

subsequent engagement they effected a great slaughter among the

Persians, the glory of which was enhanced by the death of Daurises,

general of the barbarians, and son-in-law to Darius. But this action

was not sufficiently decisive to arrest the progress of the Persian

arms. Artaphernes, satrap of Sardis, and Otanes, the third general in

command, led their forces into Ionia and Aeolia:--the Ionian

Clazomenae, the Aeolian Cuma, were speedily reduced.

VIII. The capture of these places, with the general fortunes of the

war, disheartened even the patient and adventurous Aristagoras. He

could not but believe that all attempts against the crushing power of

Darius were in vain. He assembled the adherents yet faithful to his

arms, and painted to them the necessity of providing a new settlement.

Miletus was no longer secure, and the vengeance of Darius was

gathering rapidly around them. After some consultation they agreed to

repair to that town and territory in Thrace which had been given by

Darius to Histiaeus [267]. Miletus was intrusted to the charge of a

popular citizen named Pythagoras, and these hardy and restless

adventurers embarked for Thrace. Aristagoras was fortunate enough to

reach in safety the settlement which had seemed so formidable a

possession to the Persian general; but his usual scheming and bold

ambition, not contented with that domain, led him to the attack of a

town in its vicinity. The inhabitants agreed to resign it into his

hands, and, probably lulled into security by this concession, he was

suddenly, with his whole force, cut off by an incursion of the

Thracian foe. So perished (B. C. 497) the author of many subsequent

and mighty events, and who, the more we regard his craft, his courage,

his perseverance, and activity, the vastness of his ends, and the

perseverance with which he pursued them, must be regarded by the

historian as one of the most stirring and remarkable spirits of that

enterprising age.

IX. The people of Miletus had not, upon light grounds or with feeble

minds, embarked in the perilous attempt to recover their liberties.

Deep was the sentiment that inspired--solemn and stern the energy

which supported them. The Persian generals now collected in one body

their native and auxiliary force. The Cyprians, lately subdued (B. C.

496), were compelled to serve. Egypt and Cilicia swelled the

armament, and the skill of the Phoenicians rendered yet more

formidable a fleet of six hundred vessels. With this power the

barbarians advanced upon Miletus. Most, if not all, of the Ionian

states prepared themselves for the struggle--delegates met at the

Panionium--it was agreed to shun the Persians upon land--to leave to

the Milesians the defence of their city--to equip the utmost naval

force they could command--and, assembling in one fleet off the small

isle of Lade, opposite to Miletus, to hazard the battle upon the seas.

Three hundred and fifty triremes were provided, and met at the

appointed place. The discipline of the navy was not equal to the

valour of the enterprise; Dionysius, commander of the Phocaeans,

attempted, perhaps too rigorously, to enforce it;--jealousy and

disgust broke out among the troops--and the Samian leaders, whether

displeased with their allies, or tempted by the Persians, who, through

the medium of the exiled tyrants of Greece, serving with them,

maintained correspondence with the Ionians, secretly agreed to desert

in the midst of the ensuing battle. This compact made, the

Phoenicians commenced the attack, and the Ionians, unsuspicious of

treachery, met them with a contracted line. In the beginning of the

engagement, the Samians, excepting only eleven ships (whose captains

were afterward rewarded by a public column in their native

market-place), fulfilled their pledge, and sailed away to Samos. The

Lesbians, stationed next them, followed their example, and confusion

and flight became contagious. The Chians alone redeemed the character

of the allies, aided, indeed, by Dionysius the Phocaean, who, after

taking three of the enemy's ships, refused to retreat till the day was

gone, and then, sailing to Phoenicia, sunk several trading vessels,

enriched himself with their spoil, and eventually reaching Sicily,

became renowned as a pirate, formidable to the Carthaginian and

Tyrsenian families of the old Phoenician foe, but holding his Grecian

countrymen sacred from his depredations.

The Persian armament now bent all its vengeance on Miletus; they

besieged it both by land and by sea--every species of military machine

then known was directed against its walls, and, in the sixth year

after the revolt of Aristagoras, Miletus fell (B. C. 494)--Miletus,

the capital of Ionia--the mother of a hundred colonies! Pittacus,

Thales, Arctinus, were among the great names she gave to science and

to song. Worthy of her renown, she fell amid the ruins of that

freedom which she showed how nobly she could have continued to adorn

by proving how sternly she could defend. The greater part of the

citizens were slain--those who remained, with the women and the

children, were borne into slavery by the victors. Their valour and

renown touched the heart of Darius, and he established the captives in

a city by that part of the Erythraean Sea which receives the waters of

the Barbarian Tigris. Their ancient territories were portioned out

between the Persians and the Carians of Pedasa.

X. The Athenians received the news of this fatal siege with the

deepest sorrow, and Herodotus records an anecdote illustrative of the

character of that impassioned people, and interesting to the history

of their early letters. Phrynichus, a disciple of Thespis,

represented on the stage the capture of Miletus, and the whole

audience burst into tears. The art of the poet was considered

criminal in thus forcibly reminding the Athenians of a calamity which

was deemed their own: he was fined a thousand drachmae, and the

repetition of the piece forbidden--a punishment that was but a

glorious homage to the genius of the poet and the sensibility of the

people.

After innumerable adventures, in which he exhibited considerable but

perverted abilities, Histiaeus fell into the hands of Artaphernes, and

died upon the cross. Darius rebuked the zeal of the satrap, and

lamented the death of a man, whose situation, perhaps, excused his

artifices.

And now the cloud swept onward--one after one the Ionian cities were

reduced--the islands of Chios, Lesbos, Tenedos, depopulated; and all

Ionia subjugated and enslaved. The Persian fleet proceeded to subdue

all the towns and territories to the left of the Hellespont. At this

time their success in the Chersonesus drove from that troubled isthmus

a chief, whose acute and dauntless faculties made him subsequently the

scourge of Persia and the deliverer of Greece.

XI. We have seen Miltiades, nephew to the first of that name, arrive

at the Chersonesus--by a stroke of dexterous perfidy, seize the

persons of the neighbouring chieftains--attain the sovereignty of that

peninsula, and marry the daughter of a Thracian prince. In his

character was united, with much of the intellect, all the duplicity of

the Greek. During the war between Darius and the Scythians, while

affecting to follow the Persian army, he had held traitorous

intercourse with the foe. And proposed to the Grecian chiefs to

destroy the bridge of boats across the Danube confided to their

charge; so that, what with the force of the Scythians and the pressure

of famine, the army of Darius would have perished among the Scythian

wastes, and a mighty enemy have been lost to Greece--a scheme that,

but for wickedness, would have been wise. With all his wiles, and all

his dishonesty, Miltiades had the art, not only of rendering authority

firm, but popular. Driven from his state by the Scythian Nomades, he

was voluntarily recalled by the very subjects over whom he had

established an armed sovereignty--a rare occurrence in that era of

republics. Surrounded by fierce and restless foes, and exercised in

constant, if petty warfare, Miltiades had acquired as much the

experience of camps as the subtleties of Grecian diplomacy; yet, like

many of the wise of small states, he seems to have been more crafty

than rash--the first for flight wherever flight was the better policy

--but the first for battle if battle were the more prudent. He had in

him none of the inconsiderate enthusiasm of the hero--none of the

blind but noble subservience to honour. Valour seems to have been for

his profound intellect but the summation of chances, and when we

afterward find him the most daring soldier, it is only because he was

the acutest calculator.

On seeing the Phoenician fleet, raider Persia, arrive off the Isle of

Tenedos, which is opposite the Chersonesus, Miltiades resolved not to

wait the issue of a battle: as before he had fled the Scythian, so

now, without a struggle, he succumbed to the Phoenician sword. He

loaded five vessels with his property--with four he eluded the hostile

fleet--the fifth, commanded by his eldest son, was pursued and taken

[268]. In triumphant safety the chief of the Chersonesus arrived at

Athens. He arrived at that free state to lose the dignity of a

Thracian prince, and suddenly to be reminded that he was an Athenian

citizen. He was immediately prosecuted for the crime of tyranny. His

influence or his art, admiration of his genius, or compassion of his

reverses, however, procured him an acquittal. We may well suppose

that, high-born and wealthy, he lost no occasion of cementing his

popularity in his native state.

XII. Meanwhile, the Persians suspended for that year all further

hostilities against the Ionians. Artaphernes endeavoured to

conciliate the subdued colonies by useful laws, impartial taxes, and

benign recommendations to order and to peace. The next year, however,

that satrap was recalled (B. C. 492), and Mardonius, a very young

noble, the son-in-law of Darius, was appointed, at the head of a

considerable naval and military force, to the administration of the

affairs in that part of the Persian empire. Entering Ionia, he

executed a novel, a daring, but no unstatesman-like stroke of policy.

He removed all the Ionian tyrants, and everywhere restored republican

forms of government; deeming, unquestionably, that he is the securest

master of distant provinces who establishes among them the

institutions which they best love. Then proceeding to the Hellespont,

Mardonius collected his mighty fleets and powerful army, and passed

through Europe towards the avowed objects of the Persian vengeance--

the cities of Eretria and Athens.

From the time that the Athenians had assisted the forces of Miletus

and long in the destruction of Sardis, their offence had rankled in

the bosom of Darius. Like most monarchs, he viewed as more heinous

offenders the foreign abetters of rebellion, than the rebels

themselves. Religion, no doubt, conspired to augment his indignation.

In the conflagration of Sardis the temple of the great Persian deity

had perished, and the inexpiated sacrilege made a duty of revenge. So

keenly, indeed, did Darius resent the share that the remote Athenians

had taken in the destruction of his Lydian capital, that, on receiving

the intelligence, he is said to have called for his bow, and, shooting

an arrow in the air, to have prayed for vengeance against the

offenders; and three times every day, as he sat at table, his

attendants were commanded to repeat to him, "Sir, remember the

Athenians."

XIII. But the design of Mardonius was not only directed against the

Athenians and the state of Eretria, it extended also to the rest of

Greece: preparations so vast were not meant to be wasted upon foes

apparently insignificant, but rather to consolidate the Persian

conquests on the Asiatic coasts, and to impress on the neighbouring

continent of Europe adequate conceptions of the power of the great

king. By sea, Mardonius subdued the islanders of Thasus, wealthy in

its gold-mines; by land he added to the Persian dependances in Thrace

and Macedonia. But losses, both by storm and battle, drove him back

to Asia, and delayed for a season the deliberate and organized

invasion of Greece.

In the following year (B. C. 491), while the tributary cities

Mardonius had subdued were employed in constructing vessels of war and

transports for cavalry, ambassadors were despatched by Darius to the

various states of Greece, demanding the homage of earth and water--a

preliminary calculated to ascertain who would resist, who submit to,

his power--and certain to afford a pretext, in the one case for

empire, in the other for invasion. Many of the cities of the

continent, and all the islands visited by the ambassadors, had the

timidity to comply with the terms proposed. Sparta and Athens,

hitherto at variance, united at once in a haughty and indignant

refusal. To so great a height was the popular rage in either state

aroused by the very demand, that the Spartans threw the ambassadors

into their wells, and the Athenians, into their pit of punishment,

bidding them thence get their earth and water; a singular coincidence

of excess in the two states--to be justified by no pretence--to be

extenuated only by the reflection, that liberty ever becomes a species

of noble madness when menaced by foreign danger. [269]

XIV. With the rest of the islanders, the people of Aegina, less

resolute than their near neighbours and ancient foes, the Athenians,

acceded to the proposal of tribute. This, more than the pusillanimity

of the other states, alarmed and inflamed the Athenians; they

suspected that the aeginetans had formed some hostile alliance against

them with the Persians, and hastened to accuse them to Sparta of

betraying the liberties of Greece. Nor was there slight ground for

the suspicions of the Athenians against Aegina. The people of that

island had hereditary and bitter feuds with the Athenians, dating

almost from their independence of their parent state of Epidaurus;

mercantile jealousies were added to ancestral enmity, and the wares of

Athens were forbidden all application to sacred uses in Aegina. We

have seen the recent occasion on which Attica was invaded by these

hostile neighbours, then allied with Thebes: and at that period the

naval force of gins was such as to exceed the unconscious and untried

resources of the Athenians. The latter had thus cause at once to hate

and to dread a rival placed by nature in so immediate a vicinity to

themselves, that the submission of Aegina to the Persian seemed in

itself sufficient for the destruction of Athens.

XV. The Athenian ambassadors met with the most favourable reception

at Sparta. The sense of their common danger, and sympathy in their

mutual courage, united at once these rival states; even the rash and

hitherto unrelenting Cleomenes eagerly sought a reconciliation with

his former foe. That prince went in person to Aegina, determined to

ascertain the authors of the suspected treachery;--with that

characteristic violence which he never provided the means to support,

and which so invariably stamps this unable and headstrong Spartan, as

one who would have been a fool, if he had not been a madman--Cleomenes

endeavoured to seize the persons of the accused. He was stoutly

resisted, and disgracefully baffled, in this impotent rashness; and

his fellow-king, Demaratus, whom we remember to have suddenly deserted

Cleomenes at Eleusis, secretly connived with the Aeginetans in their

opposition to his colleague, and furnished them with an excuse, by

insinuating that Cleomenes had been corrupted by the Athenians. But

Demaratus was little aware of the dark and deadly passions which

Cleomenes combined with his constitutional insanity. Revenge made a

great component of his character, and the Grecian history records few

instances of a nature more vehemently vindictive.

There had been various rumours at Sparta respecting the legitimacy of

Demaratus. Cleomenes entered into a secret intrigue with a kinsman of

his colleague, named Leotychides, who cherished an equal hatred

against Demaratus [270]; the conditions between them were, that

Cleomenes should assist in raising Leotychides to the throne of

Demaratus, and Leotychides should assist Cleomenes in his vengeance

against Aegina. No sooner was this conspiracy agreed upon than

Leotychides propagated everywhere the report that the birth of

Demaratus was spurious. The Spartans attached the greatest value to

legitimacy,--they sent to consult the Pythian--and Cleomenes, through

the aid of Colon, a powerful citizen of Delphi, bribed the oracle to

assert the illegitimacy of his foe. Demaratus was deposed. Sinking

at once into the rank of a private citizen, he was elected to some

inferior office. His enemy, Leotychides, now upon his throne, sent

him, by way of insult, a message to demand which he preferred--his

past or his present dignity. Demaratus was stung, and answered, that

the question might fix the date of much weal or much wo to Sparta;

saying this, he veiled his head--sought his home--sacrificed to

Jupiter--and solemnly adjured his mother to enlighten him as to his

legitimacy. The parental answer was far from unequivocal, and the

matron appeared desirous of imputing the distinction of his birth to

the shade of an ancient Spartan hero, Astrobachus, rather than to the

earthly embrace of her husband. Demaratus heard, and formed his

decision: he escaped from Sparta, baffled his pursuers, and fled into

Asia, where he was honourably received and largely endowed by the

beneficent Darius.

XVI. Leotychides, elected to the regal dignity, accompanied Cleomenes

to Aegina: the people of that isle yielded to the authority they could

not effectually resist; and ten of their most affluent citizens were

surrendered as hostages to Athens. But, in the meanwhile, the

collusion of Cleomenes with the oracle was discovered--the priestess

was solemnly deposed--and Cleomenes dreaded the just indignation of

his countrymen. He fled to Thessaly, and thence passing among the

Arcadians, he endeavoured to bind that people by the darkest oaths to

take arms against his native city--so far could hatred stimulate a man

consistent only in his ruling passion of revenge. But the mighty

power of Persia now lowering over Lacedaemon, the Spartan citizens

resolved to sacrifice even justice to discretion: it was not a time to

distract their forces by new foes, and they invited Cleomenes back to

Sparta, with the offer of his former station. He returned, but his

violent career, happily for all, was now closed; his constitutional

madness, no longer confined to doubtful extravagance, burst forth into

incontrollable excess. He was put under confinement, and obtaining a

sword from a Helot, who feared to disobey his commands, he

deliberately destroyed himself--not by one wound, but slowly gashing

the flesh from his limbs until he gradually ascended to the nobler and

more mortal parts. This ferocious suicide excited universal horror,

and it was generally deemed the divine penalty of his numerous and

sacrilegious crimes: the only dispute among the Greeks was, to which

of his black offences the wrath of Heaven was the most justly due.

[271]

XVII. No sooner did the news of his suicide reach the Aeginetans than

those proud and wealthy islanders sought, by an embassy to Sparta, to

regain their hostages yet detained at Athens. With the death of

Cleomenes, the anger of Sparta against Aegina suddenly ceased--or,

rather, we must suppose that a new party, in fellowship with the

Aeginetan oligarchy, came into power. The Spartans blamed Leotychides

for his co-operation with Cleomenes; they even offered to give him up

to the Aeginetans--and it was finally agreed that he should accompany

the ambassadors of Aegina to Athens, and insist on the surrender of

the hostages. But the Athenians had now arrived at that spirit of

independence, when nor the deadly blows of Persia, nor the iron sword

of Sparta, nor the treacherous hostilities of their nearest neighbour,

could quell their courage or subdue their pride. They disregarded the

presence and the orations of Leotychides, and peremptorily refused

to surrender their hostages. Hostilities between Aegina and Athens

were immediately renewed. The Aeginetans captured (B. C. 494) the

sacred vessel then stationed at Sunium, in which several of the most

eminent Athenians were embarked for the festival of Apollo; nor could

the sanctity of the voyage preserve the captives from the ignominy of

irons. The Athenians resolved upon revenge, and a civil dissension in

Aegina placed it in their power. An Aeginetan traitor, named

Nicodromus, offered them his assistance, and, aided by the popular

party opposed to the oligarchical government, he seized the citadel.

With twenty ships from Corinth, and fifty of their own, the Athenians

invaded Aegina; but, having been delayed in making the adequate

preparations, they arrived a day later than had been stipulated.

Nicodromus fled; the oligarchy restored, took signal and barbarous

vengeance upon such of their insurgent countrymen as fell into their

hands. Meanwhile, the Athenian fleet obtained a victory at sea, and

the war still continued.

XVIII. While, seemingly unconscious of greater dangers, Athens thus

practised her rising energies against the little island of Aegina,

thrice every day the servants of the Persian king continued to

exclaim, "Sir, remember the Athenians!" [272] The traitor, Hippias,

constantly about the person of the courteous monarch, never failed to

stimulate still further his vengeance by appealing to his ambition.

At length, Darius resolved no longer to delay the accomplishment of

his designs. He recalled Mardonius, whose energy, indeed, had not

been proportioned to his powers, and appointed two other generals--

Datis, a native of the warlike Media, and Artaphernes, his own nephew,

son to the former satrap of that name. These were expressly ordered

to march at once against Eretria and Athens. And Hippias, now broken

in frame, advanced in age [273], and after an exile of twenty years,

accompanied the Persian army--sanguine of success, and grasping, at

the verge of life the shadow of his former sceptre.

Athens: Its Rise and Fall, Book II · 第 4 / 5 章