And, on the other side, for sorrow: Had any loss or disaster made but

room for grief, it would have moved according to the severe allowances

of prudence, and the proportions of the provocation. It would not have

sallied out into complaint of loudness, nor spread itself upon the

face, and writ sad stories upon the forehead. No wringing of hands,

knocking the breast, or wishing oneself unborn; all which are but the

ceremonies of sorrow, the pomp and ostentation of an effeminate grief,

which speak not so much the greatness of the misery as the smallness

of the mind! Tears may spoil the eyes, but not wash away the

affliction. Sighs may exhaust the man, but not eject the burden.

Sorrow, then, would have been as silent as thought, as severe as

philosophy. It would have been rested in inward senses, tacit

dislikes; and the whole scene of it been transacted in sad and silent

reflections....

And, lastly, for the affection of fear: It was then the instrument of

caution, not of anxiety; a guard, and not a torment to the breast that

had it. It is now indeed an unhappiness, the disease of the soul: it

flies from a shadow, and makes more dangers than it avoids; it weakens

the judgment and betrays the succors of reason: so hard is it to

tremble and not to err, and to hit the mark with a shaking hand. Then

it fixt upon Him who is only to be feared, God; and yet with a filial

fear, which at the same time both fears and loves. It was awe without

amazement, dread without distraction. There was then a beauty even in

this very paleness. It was the color of devotion, giving a luster to

reverence and a gloss to humility.

Thus did the passions then act without any of their present jars,

combats, or repugnances; all moving with the beauty of uniformity

and the stillness of composure; like a well-governed army, not for

fighting, but for rank and order. I confess the Scripture does not

expressly attribute these several endowments to Adam in his first

estate. But all that I have said, and much more, may be drawn out of

that short aphorism, "God made man upright." And since the opposite

weaknesses infest the nature of man fallen, if we will be true to the

rules of contraries we must conclude that these perfections were the

lot of man innocent....

Having thus surveyed the image of God in the soul of man, we are not

to omit now those characters of majesty that God imprinted upon the

body. He drew some traces of His image upon this also, as much as a

spiritual substance could be pictured upon a corporeal. As for the

sect of the Anthropomorphites, who from hence ascribe to God the

figure of a man, eyes, hands, feet, and the like, they are too

ridiculous to deserve a confutation. They would seem to draw this

impiety from the letter of the Scripture sometimes speaking of God in

this manner. Absurdity! as if the mercy of Scripture expressions ought

to warrant the blasphemy of our opinions; and not rather to show us

that God condescends to us only to draw us to Himself; and clothes

Himself in our likeness only to win us to His own. The practise of

the papists is much of the same nature, in their absurd and impious

picturing of God Almighty; but the wonder in them is the less since

the image of a deity may be a proper object for that which is but

the image of a religion. But to the purpose: Adam was then no less

glorious in his externals; he had a beautiful body, as well as an

immortal soul. The whole compound was like a well-built temple,

stately without, and sacred within. The elements were at perfect union

and agreement in His body; and their contrary qualities served not for

the dissolution of the compound, but the variety of the composure.

Galen, who had no more divinity than what his physic taught him,

barely upon the consideration of this so exact frame of the body,

challenges any one, upon a hundred years' study, to find out how any

the least fiber, or most minute particle, might be more commodiously

placed, either for the advantage of use or comeliness. His stature

erect, and tending upward to his center; his countenance majestic

and comely, with the luster of a native beauty that scorned the poor

assistance of art or the attempts of imitation; His body of so much

quickness and agility that it did not only contain but also represent

the soul; for we might well suppose that where God did deposit so rich

a jewel He would suitably adorn the case. It was a fit workhouse for

sprightly, vivid faculties to exercise and exert themselves in; a

fit tabernacle for an immortal soul, not only to dwell in, but to

contemplate upon; where it might see the world without travel, it

being a lesser scheme of the creation, nature contracted a little

cosmography or map of the universe. Neither was the body then subject

to distempers, to die by piecemeal, and languish under coughs,

catarrhs, or consumptions. Adam knew no disease so long as temperance

from the forbidden fruit secured him. Nature was his physician, and

innocence and abstinence would have kept him healthful to immortality.

The two great perfections that both adorn and exercise man's

understanding, are philosophy and religion: for the first of these,

take it even among the professors of it where it most flourished, and

we shall find the very first notions of common-sense debauched by

them. For there have been such as have asserted, "that there is no

such thing in the world as motion: that contradictions may be true."

There has not been wanting one that has denied snow to be white. Such

a stupidity or wantonness had seized upon the most raised wits that it

might be doubted whether the philosophers or the owls of Athens

were the quicker sighted. But then for religion; what prodigious,

monstrous, misshapen births has the reason of fallen man produced!

It is now almost six thousand years that far the greater part of the

world has had no other religion but idolatry: and idolatry certainly

is the first-born of folly, the great and leading paradox, nay, the

very abridgment and sum total of all absurdities. For is it not

strange that a rational man should worship an ox, nay, the image of an

ox? That he should fawn upon his dog? Bow himself before a cat? Adore

leeks and garlic, and shed penitential tears at the smell of a deified

onion? Yet so did the Egyptians, once the famed masters of all arts

and learning. And to go a little further, we have yet a stronger

instance in Isaiah, "A man hews him down a tree in the wood, and a

part of it he burns, with the residue thereof he maketh a god." With

one part he furnishes his chimney, with the other his chapel. A

strange thing that the fire must first consume this part and then burn

incense to that. As if there was more divinity in one end of the

stick than in the other; or, as if he could be graved and painted

omnipotent, or the nails and the hammer could give it an apotheosis!

Briefly, so great is the change, so deplorable the degradation of our

nature, that whereas we bore the image of God, we now retain only the

image of man.

In the last place, we learn hence the excellency of Christian

religion, in that it is the great and only means that God has

sanctified and designed to repair the breaches of humanity, to set

fallen man upon his legs again, to clarify his reason, to rectify his

will, and to compose and regulate his affections. The whole business

of our redemption is, in short, only to rub over the defaced copy of

the creation, to reprint God's image upon the soul, and, as it were,

to set forth nature in a second and fairer edition; the recovery of

which lost image, as it is God's pleasure to command, and our duty to

endeavor, so it is in His power only to effect; to whom be rendered

and ascribed, as is most due, all praise, might, majesty, and

dominion, both now and forever more. Amen.

END OF VOL. II.

The World's Great Sermons, Volume 02: Hooker to South · 第 12 / 12 段