THE KEEPER. (_Continued._)

Is there no way, then, you may ask, in which the Head Keeper may be lured

from his customary silence for more than a sentence or two? Yes, there is

one absolutely certain method, and, so far as I know, only one. The subject

to which you must lead your conversation is--no, it isn't poachers, for a

good keeper takes the occasional poacher as part of his programme. He wages

war against him, of course; and, if his shooting happens to be situated

near a town of some importance, the war is often a very sanguinary one,

only ended by the extermination (according to Assize-Court methods) of the

poachers. But the keeper, as I say, takes all this as a matter of course.

He recognises that poachers, after all, are men; as a sportsman, he must

have a sneaking sympathy for one whose science and wood-craft often baffle

his own; and, therefore, though he fights against him sturdily and

conscientiously, and, as a rule, triumphs over him, he does not generally,

being what I have described him, brag of these victories, nor, indeed, does

he care to talk about them. "There, but for the grace of God, goes

Velveteens," must be the mental exclamation of many a good keeper when he

hears his enemy sentenced to a period of compulsory confinement. I do not

wish to be misunderstood. There are poachers and poachers. And whereas we

may have a certain sympathy for the instinct of sport that seems to compel

some men to match their skill against the craft of fur or feather reared at

the expense and by the labour of others, there can surely be none for the

methodical rogues who band themselves together on business principles, and

plunder coverts just as others crack cribs, or pick pockets. Even sentiment

is wasted on these gentlemen.

But I return from this digression. The one subject, then, on which a keeper

may be trusted to become eloquent, is, that of

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 104, January 28, 1893 · 第 5 / 17 题