The next case is the case of--

[Sidenote: =Gibson v. Acle.=]

_Gibson v. Acle._--In this case, Mr. Phillip Gibson, the

well-known publisher, brought an action for the recovery of a

sum of £3. 10_s._, advanced to Miss Acle, of “The Wolfcote,”

Croydon, in consideration of her contracting to supply a short

story, with regard to the manuscript of which he maintained,

upon receiving it, that (1) it was not a story, and (2) it was

not technically “short,” as it filled but eighteen lines in the

very large type known as grand pica. Three very important points

were decided in this case; for the Judge (Mr. Justice Veale,

brother of Lord Burpham) maintained, with sturdy common sense,

that if a publisher bought a manuscript, no matter what, so long

as it did not offend common morals or the public security of the

realm, he was bound to “print, comfort, cherish, defend, enforce,

push, maintain, advertize, circulate, and make public the same”;

and he was supported in the Court of Crown Cases Reserved in his

decision that:

_First_: the word “short” was plainly the more applicable the

less lengthy were the matter delivered: and

_Secondly_: the word “story” would hold as a definition for any

concoction of words whatsoever, of which it could be proved that

it was built up of separate sentences, such sentences each to

consist of at least one predicate and one verb, real or imaginary.

Both these decisions are quite recent, and may be regarded as the

present state of the law on the matter.

Once the legal position of the author is grasped, it is necessary

to acquire the five simple rules which govern the Short Story.

1st. It should, as a practical matter apart from the law, contain

some incident.

2nd. That incident should take place on the sea, or in brackish, or

at least tidal, waters.

3rd. The hero should be English-speaking, white or black.

4th. His adventures should be horrible; but no kind of moral should

be drawn from them, unless it be desired to exalt the patriotism of

the reader.

5th. Every short story should be divided by a “Cæsura”: that is, it

should break off sharp in the middle, and you have then the choice

of three distinct courses:

(_a_). To stop altogether--as is often done by people who die, and

whose remains are published.

(_b_). To go on with a totally different subject. This method

is not to be commended to the beginner. It is common to rich or

popular writers; and even they have commonly the decency to put in

asterisks.

(_c_). To go on with your story where it left off, as I have done

in the model which follows.

That model was constructed especially with the view to guide

the beginner. Its hero is a fellow subject, white--indeed, an

Englishman. The scene is laid in water, not perhaps salt, but at

least brackish. The adventure preys upon the mind. The moral is

doubtful: the Cæsura marked and obvious. Moreover, it begins in the

middle, which (as I omitted to state above) is the very hall-mark

of the Vivid Manner.

The Aftermath; Or, Gleanings from a Busy Life Called upon the outer cover, for purposes of sale, Caliban's Guide to Letters · 第 41 / 99 题