IX.

But whatever may be the opportunities and capabilities of infantine

gymnastics, there is always one way in which fathers may indirectly,

but very powerfully, influence their children, and that is through the

mother. When her little children are around her, she needs above all

earthly things the strength, support, society, and sympathy of her

husband. It is wellnigh impossible to conceive the demand which a

little child makes upon its mother's vitality. In Nature's plan, I

believe, the supply is always equal to the demand. The new, fresh life

gives back through a thousand channels all the life it draws. But if

the mother is left alone, in such a solitude as is never found outside

of marriage, but often and often within it; if she is left to seek in

her baby her chief solace, unhappy is her fate. The little one

exhausts her physical strength, and the inattentive and

abstracted--alas! that one may not seldom say, the unkind and

overbearing husband fails to supply her with moral strength, and her

weary feet go on with ever-diminishing joy. All this is unnecessary.

All this is contrary to the Divine economy. Every child ought to be a

new spring of life, an El Dorado, fountain of immortal youth. Whether

it shall be or not lies, if you look at it from one point, wholly with

the husband, or if you look at it from another, wholly with the wife.

On the one hand, each is all-powerful. On the other, each is

powerless. But the husband has always the advantage of strength,

out-door activities, and continual commerce with the world, and

consequent variety. The wife, surrounded by her children, is in danger

of giving herself up to them entirely. She will incessantly dispense

her life without being careful to furnish herself for such demands by

opening her soul to new accessions. Here is where her husband should

stand by her continually to encourage and stimulate. If she is not

strong enough to go out into the world, let him bring the world home

to her. He should by all means see to it that her heart and soul do

not contract. Every child, every added experience, should have the

effect of expanding her horizon, deepening and enlarging her

sympathies, and enabling her to gather the whole earth into her

motherly love. Her little world ought to be a type of the great world.

The wisdom which she gathers in the one, she ought to turn to the good

of the other,--a good that will surely come back again in other shapes

to her family world. So, every family should be both a missionary

centre and the medium through which, in never-ending flow, all good

and gracious influences shall pour. Every family should rise and fall

with the pulse of humanity, and not be a mere knob of organic matter,

without dependencies or connections. But the father should see to

this. He should gently lure the mother out of her nursery into such

broad fresh air as she needs for healthy growth. What that shall be is

a question of character and culture. A lyceum lecture, a

sewing-society, an evening party, a concert, a county fair, may be

elevation, amusement, improvement to her. Or he may do her most good

by helping her to be interested in reading, either in the current or

in classic literature. Or, best of all, he may charm her with his own

companionship, beguile her with pleasant drives, or walks and talks,

keeping her heart open on the husband side, and so continually alive,

while maintaining also the oneness which marriage in theory creates.

It is this respect in which husbands are perhaps most generally

deficient. They do not talk with their wives. If a neighbor is

married, they tell of it. If a battle is fought, or a village burnt

down, they communicate the fact; but for any interchange of thought or

sentiment or emotion, for any conversation that is invigorating,

inspiring, that causes a thrill or leaves a glow, how often does such

a thing occur between husband and wife? What intellectual meeting is

there,--what shock of electricities? When a definite domestic question

is to be decided, the wife's judgment may be sought, and that is

better than a solitary stumbling on, regardless of her views or

feelings; but this sort of bread-and-butter discussion of ways and

means is not the gentle, animated play of conversation, not that

pleasant sparkle which enlivens the hours, that trustful confidence

which lightens the heart, that wielding of weapons which strengthens

the arm, that sweet, instinctive half unveiling which increases

respect and deepens love and fills the heart with inexpressible

tenderness. Yet there is nobody in the world with whom it is so

important for a man to be intimately acquainted as his own wife, while

such intimate acquaintance is the exception rather than the rule. Ever

one sees them going on each in his own path, each with his own inner

world of opinions and hopes and memories, one in name, miserably two

in all else.

Men often have too much confidence in their measuring-lines. They

fancy they have fathomed a soul's depths when they have but sounded

its shallows. They think they have circumnavigated the globe when they

have only paddled in a cove. They trim their sails for other seas,

leaving the priceless gems of their own undiscovered. To many a man no

voyage of exploration would bring such rich returns as a persevering

and affectionate search into the resources of the heart which he calls

his own. Many and many a man would be amazed at learning that in the

tame household drudge, in the meek, timid, apologetic recipient of his

caprices, in the worn and fretful invalid, in the commonplace, insipid

domestic weakling he scorns an angel unawares. Many a wife is wearied

and neglected into moral shabbiness, who, rightly entreated, would

have walked sister and wife of the gods. Human nature in certain

directions is as infinite as the Divine nature, and when a man turns

away from his wife, under the impression that he has exhausted her

capabilities, and must seek elsewhere the sympathy and companionship

he craves or go without it altogether, let him reflect that the

chances are at least even that he has but exhausted himself, and that

the soil which seems to him fallow might in other hands or with a

wiser culture yield most plenteous harvests.

There is another point which should be kept in solemn consideration.

The deportment of children to their parents is very largely influenced

by the deportment of parents to each other. It is of small service

that a child be taught to repeat the formula, "Honor thy father and

thy mother," if, by his bearing, the father continually dishonors the

mother. The Monday courtesy has more effect than the Sunday

commandment. Every conjugal impoliteness is a lesson in filial

disrespect. If a son sees that his father is regardless of his

mother's taste, does not respect her opinions, or heed her

sensitiveness or care for her happiness; or if, on the other hand, he

sees that she is held in ever-watchful love, he will be very likely to

follow in the same path. There are of course exceptions. A gross and

brutal abuse may work an opposite effect by the law of contrarieties,

but in ordinary cases this is the ordinary course of events. In common

Christian families a boy will appraise his mother at his father's

valuation. If the husband takes the liberty of speaking to her

sharply, the son when irritated will not think it worth while to

repress his inclination to do the same. If the husband is not careful

to pay her outward respect, let it not be supposed that his son will

set him the example. But if the husband cherishes her with delight, if

his behavior always assumes that the best is to be reserved for her,

the best will be her incense from the whole family, and no son will

any more allow himself to indulge any evil propensity in her presence

than he would pluck out his right eye. And in the delicacy, the

refinement, the gentleness and warmth and consecration of her presence

all this courtesy and consideration will come back to them a

hundred-fold in constant dews of blessing.

As with habits so with principles. The mother's influence is strong,

but the stories told of its strength are often hurtful in their

tendency. It is not the strength of the mother's, but of the father's

influence, that needs to be held up to prominence. By Divine

sufferance, mothers can do much to abrogate the evil consequences of

paternal misdoing,--but paternal misdoing is not for that any the less

evil. If the husband laughs at his wife's temperance notions, and

thinks wine-sipping to be elegant and harmless, his boy will sip wine

elegantly and fancy his mother old-fashioned; and with his father's

appetite, but without his father's strength, and with more than his

father's temptations,--in the great city, homeless, bewildered, and

dazzled,--he will rush on to a bitter end. If the husband thinks

religion a thing beautiful and becoming to woman, but unnecessary to

manly character, his son will not long go to church and to Sunday

school when he feels in his veins the thrill of approaching manhood. I

know a community where not a man can be found to superintend the Sabbath

school, and a woman, noble and whole-souled, takes its charge upon

herself. The fathers do not disbelieve in Sunday schools, or they

would not suffer their wives and children to go. They do not believe in

them, or they would go themselves. They are simply indifferent,--and

indifferent in a matter so important, that indifference is guilt. Will

the young men of that community be likely to fear God and keep his

commandments? Will they be likely to acknowledge the claims of a

religion which their fathers despise? If they grow up hardened,

selfish, headstrong, unfortified against assault, will it be the fault

of the mothers who are struggling against wind and tide, or of the

fathers who are lazily lounging at oar and rudder?

People in general are not half married. Half? If one would

mathematically approximate the truth, he must multiply his denominator

far beyond reach of the digits; and, what is still worse the fraction

that is married is, in a vast majority of cases, not only the least,

but the lowest. It is not the intellect, the spirit, the immortality,

that is married, but that alone which is of the earth, earthy.

Xenophon, in his _Memorabilia Socratis_, presents to us Ischomacus, an

Athenian of great riches and reputation, repairing to Socrates for

help in extricating him from domestic entanglements. In laying the

case before the philosopher, Ischomacus informs him that he told his

wife that his main object in marrying her was to have a person in

whose discretion he could confide, who would take proper care of his

servants, and expend his money with economy,--which was certainly very

frank.

But that was twenty-three hundred years ago, and people have grown

less material and more spiritual since then. No man now would hold out

to a woman such inducement to marriage. Certainly not. Men now wait

till the Rubicon is passed, and then lay down their pleasant little

programmes in the newspapers,--general principles for private

consumption. The popular voice, speaking in your everywhere

circulating newspaper, says: "A man gets a wife to look after his

affairs, and to assist him in his journey through life; to educate and

prepare their children for a proper station in life, and not to

dissipate his property. The husband's interest should be the wife's

care, and her greatest ambition to carry her no farther than his

welfare or happiness, together with that of her children. This should

be her sole aim, and the theatre of her exploits in the bosom of her

family, where she may do as much toward making a fortune as he can in

the counting-room or the workshop."

Is this very much more commanding than the attitude of Ischomacus?

Does Anno Domini loom with immeasurable grandeur above Anno Mundi?

Ischomacus wanted his wife to manage his fortune. Young America wants

his to help make one. Is it a very great stride in advance,

considering we have been twenty-three centuries about it? This extract

I take from a religious newspaper, and it is pagan to the heart's

core; yes, and in these matters the Church is as pagan as the World.

Because a man is folded in the Church, one has no more expectation of

finding in him spiritual views concerning marriage than if he belonged

to the World. Unmitigated selfishness, worldliness, greed, and

evil-seeking are the roots and fruits of such a "religious" paragraph.

Church and World are both gone aside and altogether become filthy. The

holy sacrament is profaned alike by churchman and worldling. It is

tossed on the spear-point of levity, it is clutched under the

muck-rake of materialism, it is degraded and defiled till its pristine

purity is wellnigh lost, and only a marred and defaced image rears its

foul features from the mire. That it does not always cause disgust, is

because the goddess is so chiefly hidden that women do not recognize

the lineaments of the demon which has usurped her place. Miasma has

polluted the atmosphere so long that people do not know the feeling of

untainted air. O, it is good to speak your mind, be it only once in a

lifetime! Now I wish I had walked softly all my days, that, with all

the force of a rare indignation, I might just this once crush down

that hateful, that debasing, that vile and leprous thing which flaunts

the name of marriage, but does not even put on the white garments of

its sanctity to hide its own shame. Leer and laugh, coarse jest,

advice, insinuation, interpretation, and conjecture beslime the

surface of our social life and work abomination. Nature and

unconsciousness become impossible, and one is swallowed up in stagnant

depths, or borne above them only with an inward, raging tempest of

irrepressible loathing. A blessing rest upon this pen-point that

stamps black and heavy into receptive paper the wrath which it is not

lawful otherwise to express. Sentiments the most repulsive, the most

insulting to womanhood and to a woman, may be coolly, carelessly,

unconsciously tossed at you by and in society, and you must smile and

parry with equal nonchalance. Thank Heaven for Gutenberg and Dr.

Faustus, that whatsoever has been spoken in darkness may be heard to

its shame in the light, and that which has been spoken in the ear may

be proclaimed upon the house-tops with the detestation it deserves!

A New Atmosphere · 第 14 / 22 题