133. You hardly know, I suppose, whether I am speaking in jest or

earnest. In the most solemn earnest, I assure you; though such is the

strange course of our popular life that all the irrational arts of

destruction are at once felt to be earnest; while any plan for those of

instruction on a grand scale, sounds like a dream, or jest. Still, I do

not absolutely propose to decorate our public buildings with sculpture

wholly of this character; though beast, and fowl, and creeping things,

and fishes, might all find room on such a building as the Solomon's

House of a New Atlantis; and some of them might even become symbolic of

much to us again. Passing through the Strand, only the other day, for

instance, I saw four highly finished and delicately colored pictures of

cock-fighting, which, for imitative quality, were nearly all that could

be desired, going far beyond the Greek cock of Himera; and they would

have delighted a Greek's soul, if they had meant as much as a Greek

cock-fight; but they were only types of the "[Greek: endomachas

alektor]," and of the spirit of home contest, which has been so fatal

lately to the Bird of France; and not of the defense of one's own

barnyard, in thought of which the Olympians set the cock on the pillars

of their chariot course; and gave it goodly alliance in its battle, as

you may see here, in what is left of the angle of moldering marble in

the chair of the priest of Dionusos. The cast of it, from the center of

the theater under the Acropolis, is in the British Museum; and I wanted

its spiral for you, and this kneeling Angel of Victory;--it is late

Greek art, but nobly systematic flat bas-relief. So I set Mr. Burgess to

draw it; but neither he nor I, for a little while, could make out what

the Angel of Victory was kneeling for. His attitude is an ancient and

grandly conventional one among the Egyptians; and I was tracing it back

to a kneeling goddess of the greatest dynasty of the Pharaohs--a goddess

of Evening, or Death, laying down the sun out of her right hand;--when,

one bright day, the shadows came out clear on the Athenian throne, and I

saw that my Angel of Victory was only backing a cock at a cock-fight.

134. Still, as I have said, there is no reason why sculpture, even for

simplest persons, should confine itself to imagery of fish, or fowl, or

four-footed things.

We go back to our first principle: we ought to carve nothing but what is

honorable. And you are offended, at this moment, with my fish, (as I

believe, when the first sculptures appeared on the windows of this

museum, offense was taken at the unnecessary introduction of cats,)

these dissatisfactions being properly felt by your "[Greek: nous ton

timiotaton]." For indeed, in all cases, our right judgment must depend

on our wish to give honor only to things and creatures that deserve it.

135. And now I must state to you another principle of veracity, both in

sculpture, and all following arts, of wider scope than any hitherto

examined. We have seen that sculpture is to be a true representation of

true internal form. Much more is it to be a representation of true

internal emotion. You must carve only what you yourself see as you see

it; but, much more, you must carve only what you yourself feel, as you

feel it. You may no more endeavor to feel through other men's souls,

than to see with other men's eyes. Whereas generally now, in Europe and

America, every man's energy is bent upon acquiring some false emotion,

not his own, but belonging to the past, or to other persons, because he

has been taught that such and such a result of it will be fine. Every

attempted sentiment in relation to art is hypocritical; our notions of

sublimity, of grace, or pious serenity, are all secondhand: and we are

practically incapable of designing so much as a bell-handle or a

door-knocker, without borrowing the first notion of it from those who

are gone--where we shall not wake them with our knocking. I would we

could.

136. In the midst of this desolation we have nothing to count on for

real growth but what we can find of honest liking and longing, in

ourselves and in others. We must discover, if we would healthily

advance, what things are verily [Greek: timiotata] among us; and if we

delight to honor the dishonorable, consider how, in future, we may

better bestow our likings. Now it appears to me, from all our popular

declarations, that we, at present, honor nothing so much as liberty and

independence; and no person so much as the Free man and Self-made man,

who will be ruled by no one, and has been taught, or helped, by no one.

And the reason I chose a fish for you as the first subject of sculpture,

was that in men who are free and self-made, you have the nearest

approach, humanly possible, to the state of the fish, and finely

organized [Greek: herpeton]. You get the exact phrase in Habakkuk, if

you take the Septuagint text,--"[Greek: poieseis tous anthropous hos

tous ichthyas tes thalasses, kai hos ta herpeta ta ouk echonta

hegoumenon]." "Thou wilt make men as the fishes of the sea, and as the

reptile things, _that have no ruler over them_." And it chanced that as

I was preparing this Lecture, one of our most able and popular prints

gave me a wood-cut of the 'self-made man,' specified as such, so

vigorously drawn, and with so few touches, that Phidias or Turner

himself could scarcely have done it better; so that I had only to ask my

assistant to enlarge it with accuracy, and it became comparable with my

fish at once. Of course it is not given by the caricaturist as an

admirable face; only, I am enabled by his skill to set before you,

without any suspicion of unfairness on _my_ part, the expression to

which the life we profess to think most honorable, naturally leads. If

we were to take the hat off, you see how nearly the profile corresponds

with that of the typical fish.

137. Such, then, being the definition, by your best popular art, of the

ideal of feature at which we are gradually arriving by self-manufacture:

when I place opposite to it (in Plate VIII.) the profile of a man not in

anywise self-made, neither by the law of his own will, nor by the love

of his own interest--nor capable, for a moment, of any kind of

'Independence,' or of the idea of independence; but wholly dependent

upon, and subjected to, external influence of just law, wise teaching,

and trusted love and truth, in his fellow-spirits;--setting before you,

I say, this profile of a God-made, instead of a self-made, man, I know

that you will feel, on the instant, that you are brought into contact

with the vital elements of human art; and that this, the sculpture of

the good, is indeed the only permissible sculpture.

138. A God-made _man_, I say. The face, indeed, stands as a symbol of

more than man in its sculptor's mind. For as I gave you, to lead your

first effort in the form of leaves, the scepter of Apollo, so this,

which I give you as the first type of rightness in the form of flesh, is

the countenance of the holder of that scepter, the Sun-God of Syracuse.

But there is nothing in the face (nor did the Greek suppose there was)

more perfect than might be seen in the daily beauty of the creatures the

Sun-God shone upon, and whom his strength and honor animated. This is

not an ideal, but a quite literally true, face of a Greek youth; nay, I

will undertake to show you that it is not supremely beautiful, and even

to surpass it altogether with the literal portrait of an Italian one. It

is in verity no more than the form habitually taken by the features of a

well-educated young Athenian or Sicilian citizen; and the one

requirement for the sculptors of to-day is not, as it has been thought,

to invent the same ideal, but merely to see the same reality.

[Illustration: VIII.

THE APOLLO OF SYRACUSE, AND THE SELF-MADE MAN.]

[Illustration: IX.

APOLLO CHRYSOCOMES OF CLAZOMENAE.]

Now, you know I told you in my Fourth Lecture[28] that the beginning of

art was in getting our country clean and our people beautiful, and you

supposed that to be a statement irrelevant to my subject; just as, at

this moment, you perhaps think I am quitting the great subject of this

present Lecture--the method of likeness-making,--and letting myself

branch into the discussion of what things we are to make likeness of.

But you shall see hereafter that the method of imitating a beautiful

thing must be different from the method of imitating an ugly one; and

that, with the change in subject from what is dishonorable to what is

honorable, there will be involved a parallel change in the management of

tools, of lines, and of colors. So that before I can determine for you

_how_ you are to imitate, you must tell me what kind of face you wish to

imitate. The best draughtsman in the world could not draw this Apollo in

ten scratches, though he can draw the self-made man. Still less this

nobler Apollo of Ionian Greece (Plate IX.), in which the incisions are

softened into a harmony like that of Correggio's painting. So that you

see the method itself,--the choice between black incision or fine

sculpture, and perhaps, presently, the choice between color or no color,

will depend on what you have to represent. Color may be expedient for a

glistening dolphin or a spotted fawn;--perhaps inexpedient for white

Poseidon, and gleaming Dian. So that, before defining the laws of

sculpture, I am compelled to ask you, _what you mean to carve_; and

that, little as you think it, is asking you how you mean to live, and

what the laws of your State are to be, for _they_ determine those of

your statue. You can only have this kind of face to study from, in the

sort of state that produced it. And you will find that sort of state

described in the beginning of the fourth book of the laws of Plato; as

founded, for one thing, on the conviction that of all the evils that can

happen to a state, quantity of money is the greatest! [Greek: meizon

kakon, hos epos eipein, polei ouden an gignoita, eis gennaion kai

dikaion ethon ktesin], "for, to speak shortly, no greater evil, matching

each against each, can possibly happen to a city, as adverse to its

forming just or generous character," than its being full of silver and

gold.

139. Of course the Greek notion may be wrong, and ours right,

only--[Greek: hos epos eipein]--you can have Greek sculpture only on

that Greek theory: shortly expressed by the words put into the mouth of

Poverty herself, in the Plutus of Aristophanes, "[Greek: Tou ploutou

parecho beltionas andras, kai ten gnomen, kai ten idean]," "I deliver to

you better men than the God of Money can, both in imagination and

feature." So, on the other hand, this ichthyoid, reptilian, or

monochondyloid ideal of the self-made man can only be reached,

universally, by a nation which holds that poverty, either of purse or

spirit,--but especially the spiritual character of being [Greek: ptochoi

to pneumati],--is the lowest of degradations; and which believes that

the desire of wealth is the first of manly and moral sentiments. As I

have been able to get the popular ideal represented by its own living

art, so I can give you this popular faith in its own living words; but

in words meant seriously, and not at all as caricature, from one of our

leading journals, professedly aesthetic also in its very name, the

_Spectator_, of August 6, 1870.

"Mr. Ruskin's plan," it says, "would make England poor, in order that

she might be cultivated, and refined, and artistic. A wilder proposal

was never broached by a man of ability; and it might be regarded as a

proof that the assiduous study of art emasculates the intellect, _and

even the moral sense_. Such a theory almost warrants the contempt with

which art is often regarded by essentially intellectual natures, like

Proudhon" (sic). "Art is noble as the flower of life, and the creations

of a Titian are a great heritage of the race; but if England could

secure high art and Venetian glory of color only by the sacrifice of her

manufacturing supremacy, and _by the acceptance of national poverty_,

then the pursuit of such artistic achievements would imply that we had

ceased to possess natures of manly strength, _or to know the meaning of

moral aims_. If we must choose between a Titian and a Lancashire cotton

mill, then, in the name of manhood and of morality, give us the cotton

mill. Only the dilettanteism of the studio; that dilettanteism which

loosens the moral no less than the intellectual fiber, and which is as

fatal to rectitude of action as to correctness of reasoning power, would

make a different choice."

You see also, by this interesting and most memorable passage, how

completely the question is admitted to be one of ethics--the only real

point at issue being, whether this face or that is developed on the

truer moral principle.

140. I assume, however, for the present, that this Apolline type is the

kind of form you wish to reach and to represent. And now observe,

instantly, the whole question of manner of imitation is altered for us.

The fins of the fish, the plumes of the swan, and the flowing of the

Sun-God's hair are all represented by incisions--but the incisions do

sufficiently represent the fin and feather,--they _in_sufficiently

represent the hair. If I chose, with a little more care and labor, I

could absolutely get the surface of the scales and spines of the fish,

and the expression of its mouth; but no quantity of labor would obtain

the real surface of a tress of Apollo's hair, and the full expression of

his mouth. So that we are compelled at once to call the imagination to

help us, and say to it, _You_ know what the Apollo Chrysocomes must be

like; finish all this for yourself. Now, the law under which imagination

works, is just that of other good workers. "You must give me clear

orders; show me what I have to do, and where I am to begin, and let me

alone." And the orders can be given, quite clearly, up to a certain

point, in form; but they cannot be given clearly in color, now that the

subject is subtle. All beauty of this high kind depends on harmony; let

but the slightest discord come into it, and the finer the thing is, the

more fatal will be the flaw. Now, on a flat surface, I can command my

color to be precisely what and where I mean it to be; on a round one I

cannot. For all harmony depends, first, on the fixed proportion of the

color of the light to that of the relative shadow; and therefore if I

fasten my color, I must fasten my shade. But on a round surface the

shadow changes at every hour of the day; and therefore all coloring

which is expressive of form, is impossible; and if the form is fine,

(and here there is nothing but what is fine,) you may bid farewell to

color.

141. Farewell to color; that is to say, if the thing is to be seen

distinctly, and you have only wise people to show it to; but if it is to

be seen indistinctly, at a distance, color may become explanatory; and

if you have simple people to show it to, color may be necessary to

excite _their_ imaginations, though not to excite yours. And the art is

great always by meeting its conditions in the straightest way; and if it

is to please a multitude of innocent and bluntly-minded persons, must

express itself in the terms that will touch them; else it is not good.

And I have to trace for you through the history of the past, and

possibilities of the future, the expedients used by great sculptors to

obtain clearness, impressiveness, or splendor; and the manner of their

appeal to the people, under various light and shadow, and with reference

to different degrees of public intelligence: such investigation

resolving itself again and again, as we proceed, into questions

absolutely ethical; as, for instance, whether color is to be bright or

dull,--that is to say, for a populace cheerful or heartless;--whether it

is to be delicate or strong,--that is to say, for a populace attentive

or careless; whether it is to be a background like the sky, for a

procession of young men and maidens, because your populace revere

life--or the shadow of the vault behind a corpse stained with drops of

blackened blood, for a populace taught to worship Death. Every critical

determination of rightness depends on the obedience to some ethic law,

by the most rational and, therefore, simplest means. And you see how it

depends most, of all things, on whether you are working for chosen

persons, or for the mob; for the joy of the boudoir, or of the Borgo.

And if for the mob, whether the mob of Olympia, or of St. Antoine.

Phidias, showing his Jupiter for the first time, hides behind the temple

door to listen, resolved afterwards "[Greek: rhythmizein to agalma pros

to tois pleistois dokoun, ou gar hegeito mikran einai symboulen demou

tosoutou]," and truly, as your people is, in judgment, and in multitude,

so must your sculpture be, in glory. An elementary principle which has

been too long out of mind.

142. I leave you to consider it, since, for some time, we shall not

again be able to take up the inquiries to which it leads. But,

ultimately, I do not doubt that you will rest satisfied in these

following conclusions:

1. Not only sculpture, but all the other fine arts, must be for the

people.

2. They must be didactic to the people, and that as their chief end. The

structural arts, didactic in their manner; the graphic arts, in their

matter also.

3. And chiefly the great representative and imaginative arts--that is to

say, the drama and sculpture--are to teach what is noble in past

history, and lovely in existing human and organic life.

4. And the test of right manner of execution in these arts, is that they

strike, in the most emphatic manner, the rank of popular minds to which

they are addressed.

5. And the test of utmost fineness in execution in these arts, is that

they make themselves be forgotten in what they represent; and so fulfill

the words of their greatest Master,

"THE BEST, IN THIS KIND, ARE BUT SHADOWS."

FOOTNOTES:

[25] See date of delivery of Lecture. The picture was of a peasant girl

of eleven or twelve years old, peeling carrots by a cottage fire.

[26] In Duerer's 'Melancholia.'

[27] Turner's, in the Hakewill series.

[28] "Lectures on Art," Sec. 116.

LECTURE V.

STRUCTURE.

_December, 1870._

143. On previous occasions of addressing you, I have endeavored to show

you, first, how sculpture is distinguished from other arts; then its

proper subjects; then its proper method in the realization of these

subjects. To-day, we must, in the fourth place, consider the means at

its command for the accomplishment of these ends; the nature of its

materials; and the mechanical or other difficulties of their treatment.

And however doubtful we may have remained as to the justice of Greek

ideals, or propriety of Greek methods of representing them, we may be

certain that the example of the Greeks will be instructive in all

practical matters relating to this great art, peculiarly their own. I

think even the evidence I have already laid before you is enough to

convince you that it was by rightness and reality, not by idealism or

delightfulness only, that their minds were finally guided; and I am sure

that, before closing the present course, I shall be able so far to

complete that evidence, as to prove to you that the commonly received

notions of classic art are, not only unfounded, but even, in many

respects, directly contrary to the truth. You are constantly told that

Greece idealized whatever she contemplated. She did the exact contrary:

she realized and verified it. You are constantly told she sought only

the beautiful. She sought, indeed, with all her heart; but she found,

because she never doubted that the search was to be consistent with

propriety and common sense. And the first thing you will always discern

in Greek work is the first which you _ought_ to discern in all work;

namely, that the object of it has been rational, and has been obtained

by simple and unostentatious means.

144. "That the object of the work has been rational"! Consider how much

that implies. That it should be by all means seen to have been

determined upon, and carried through, with sense and discretion; these

being gifts of intellect far more precious than any knowledge of

mathematics, or of the mechanical resources of art. Therefore, also,

that it should be a modest and temperate work, a structure fitted to the

actual state of men; proportioned to their actual size, as animals,--to

their average strength,--to their true necessities,--and to the degree

of easy command they have over the forces and substances of nature.

145. You see how much this law excludes! All that is fondly magnificent,

insolently ambitious, or vainly difficult. There is, indeed, such a

thing as Magnanimity in design, but never unless it be joined also with

modesty, and _Equ_animity. Nothing extravagant, monstrous, strained, or

singular, can be structurally beautiful. No towers of Babel envious of

the skies; no pyramids in mimicry of the mountains of the earth; no

streets that are a weariness to traverse, nor temples that make pigmies

of the worshipers.

It is one of the primal merits and decencies of Greek work, that it was,

on the whole, singularly small in scale, and wholly within reach of

sight, to its finest details. And, indeed, the best buildings that I

know are thus modest; and some of the best are minute jewel cases for

sweet sculpture. The Parthenon would hardly attract notice, if it were

set by the Charing Cross Railway Station: the Church of the Miracoli, at

Venice, the Chapel of the Rose, at Lucca, and the Chapel of the Thorn,

at Pisa, would not, I suppose, all three together, fill the tenth part,

cube, of a transept of the Crystal Palace. And they are better so.

146. In the chapter on Power in the 'Seven Lamps of Architecture,' I

have stated what seems, at first, the reverse of what I am saying now;

namely, that it is better to have one grand building than any number of

mean ones. And that is true: but you cannot command grandeur by size

till you can command grace in minuteness; and least of all, remember,

will you so command it to-day, when magnitude has become the chief

exponent of folly and misery, coordinate in the fraternal enormities of

the Factory and Poorhouse,--the Barracks and Hospital. And the final law

in this matter is that, if you require edifices only for the grace and

health of mankind, and build them without pretense and without

chicanery, they will be sublime on a modest scale, and lovely with

little decoration.

147. From these principles of simplicity and temperance, two very

severely fixed laws of construction follow; namely, first, that our

structure, to be beautiful, must be produced with tools of men; and,

secondly, that it must be composed of natural substances. First, I say,

produced with tools of men. All fine art requires the application of the

whole strength and subtlety of the body, so that such art is not

possible to any sickly person, but involves the action and force of a

strong man's arm from the shoulder, as well as the delicatest touch of

his fingers: and it is the evidence that this full and fine strength has

been spent on it which makes the art executively noble; so that no

instrument must be used, habitually, which is either too heavy to be

delicately restrained, or too small and weak to transmit a vigorous

impulse; much less any mechanical aid, such as would render the

sensibility of the fingers ineffectual.[29]

148. Of course, any kind of work in glass, or in metal, on a large

scale, involves some painful endurance of heat; and working in clay,

some habitual endurance of cold; but the point beyond which the effort

must not be carried is marked by loss of power of manipulation. As long

as the eyes and fingers have complete command of the material, (as a

glass-blower has, for instance, in doing fine ornamental work,)--the law

is not violated; but all our great engine and furnace work, in

gun-making and the like, is degrading to the intellect; and no nation

can long persist in it without losing many of its human faculties. Nay,

even the use of machinery other than the common rope and pulley, for the

lifting of weights, is degrading to architecture; the invention of

expedients for the raising of enormous stones has always been a

characteristic of partly savage or corrupted races. A block of marble

not larger than a cart with a couple of oxen could carry, and a

cross-beam, with a couple of pulleys, raise, is as large as should

generally be used in any building. The employment of large masses is

sure to lead to vulgar exhibitions of geometrical arrangement,[30] and

to draw away the attention from the sculpture. In general, rocks

naturally break into such pieces as the human beings that have to build

with them can easily lift; and no larger should be sought for.

149. In this respect, and in many other subtle ways, the law that the

work is to be with tools of men is connected with the farther condition

of its modesty, that it is to be wrought in substance provided by

Nature, and to have a faithful respect to all the essential qualities of

such substance.

Aratra Pentelici, Seven Lectures on the Elements of Sculpture Given before the University of Oxford in Michaelmas Term, 1870 · 第 7 / 13 段