The vogue for formality in English architecture and landscap

Transcriber's note:

Archaic spelling and variations in spelling, punctuation and

hyphenation have been retained except for those listed at the end of

the book.

Research has indicated the copyright on this book was not renewed.

Text enclosed by underscores is in italics (_italics_).

Small capital text has been replaced with all capitals.

[Illustration: cover]

_JOURNAL & LETTERS_

OF PHILIP VICKERS FITHIAN

_Journal & Letters of_

Philip Vickers Fithian

1773-1774:

_A Plantation Tutor of the

Old Dominion_

[Illustration: logo]

EDITED, WITH AN INTRODUCTION, BY

HUNTER DICKINSON FARISH;

ILLUSTRATED BY FRITZ KREDEL

The University Press of Virginia

Charlottesville

COPYRIGHT 1957 BY COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG, INCORPORATED

_Previous editions copyright 1943, 1945

by Colonial Williamsburg, Incorporated_

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 57-13498

The University Press of Virginia

First printing for Dominion Books

October 1968

Fourth printing 1990

PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

_Preface_

Once in a great while historians find a firsthand account that

provides striking insight into a past era. Only rarely is such a

document written with the perception and charm that make its readers

feel as if they had participated in the incidents described and shared

the experiences related. The journal and relevant correspondence of

Philip Fithian constitute this kind of source.

Fithian was reared in New Jersey and attended the College of New

Jersey in Princeton, receiving his degree in 1772. Before entering the

Presbyterian ministry, he followed the advice of President Witherspoon

of Princeton and became a tutor in the family of Robert Carter at

"Nomini Hall" plantation on the Northern Neck of Virginia. The

reactions of the somewhat austere young man to the rich, warm life of

a Virginia plantation are always instructive and often amusing. The

Carters and their seven children were a fascinating family, liberal in

their sentiments and deeply interested in books and music. Fithian

sets forth truthfully, yet with lively touches, the family's

assessments of the society in which it moved, the institution of

slavery, and the dispute developing with the mother country.

Throughout his experiences Fithian remained true to his "fair

Laura"--Elizabeth Beatty in far off New Jersey.

The journal, with certain of the letters, was first published in 1900,

in somewhat abbreviated form, by the Princeton Historical Association.

Dr. Hunter Dickinson Farish, in his edition of _The Journal and

Letters of Philip Vickers Fithian_ (Williamsburg Restoration

Historical Studies, III; Williamsburg, Va., 1943), included the

complete journal, added other relevant letters as well as Fithian's

catalogue of Carter's library, and supplied a thoughtful Introduction.

Dr. Farish was Director of Research at Colonial Williamsburg from 1937

until ill health forced him to retire in 1944. He broadened the

program there by bringing young research associates to the staff,

making grants-in-aid to scholars in the field of early American

history, and establishing and editing the Williamsburg Restoration

Historical Series. He also taught at the College of William and Mary

and helped to work out the organizational plans for the Institute of

Early American History and Culture, which since 1943 has been jointly

sponsored by Colonial Williamsburg and the College of William and

Mary.

Dr. Farish's edition of the _Journal_ had been out of print for a few

years when, in 1957, Colonial Williamsburg reissued it, with pen and

ink illustrations by Fritz Kredel designed to interest new readers.

The present edition by the University Press of Virginia reproduces the

1957 one, but in convenient paperback form. Young Fithian's revealing

picture of Virginia plantation life will always be a key source for

the historian and an absorbing human document for the general reader.

EDWARD P. ALEXANDER

Director of Interpretation

_Colonial Williamsburg

September 1967_

_Contents_

INTRODUCTION

1. Virginia During the Golden Age xiii

2. Philip Fithian and the Carter Family xxv

JOURNAL AND LETTERS OF PHILIP FITHIAN 3

APPENDIX 221

NOTES 237

INDEX 249

_CHAPTER ONE_

Virginia During The Golden Age

In the "Golden Age," or half-century immediately preceding the

American Revolution, a remarkable civilization reached its zenith in

the broad coastal plain of eastern Virginia. Gradually, during a

century of colonization and expansion, the heavily wooded tidewater

had been converted into a land of settled order and accumulated

wealth. Vast estates had been carved out of the wilderness and large

plantations were everywhere the rule.

Embraced by numerous arms of the Chesapeake and covered by a network

of wide rivers and creeks, this sylvan Venice abounded in safe and

convenient water routes. Pressing through the mouths of the deep

estuaries, the ocean tides reached the "fall-line," beyond which the

streams were inaccessible to shipping owing to the rapids. Ocean

vessels could penetrate to the plantations in every part of the

lowlands and carry cargoes thence straight to the wharves of London

and the outports. Despite the distance and rigors of the voyage, the

colonists of the Tidewater had maintained a constant intercourse with

the mother country from the time of their earliest settlement.

The hope had long persisted that this coastal plain might yield the

ores, timber, ship stores and other products England needed, and for

which she then largely depended on foreign potentates. Lacking an

ample supply of cheap labor, however, colonial industries could not

compete with well-established ones of the Old World. For well over a

century tobacco proved the one commodity which the colony could

profitably produce for the home market in large quantities.

A notable result of the method of tobacco cultivation was a rapid

depletion of the soil. Intent only upon reaping quick returns, men

customarily neglected the most ordinary precautions to preserve

fertility. Since the tobacco plant required the richest loam to

produce the leaf in its perfection, fields were usually abandoned

after three or more crops had been harvested, and "new grounds" were

cleared. Thus there developed an ever recurring need for fresh lands.

Under so wasteful a system, Virginians had soon realized the necessity

of acquiring many times the quantity of land they could cultivate at

any one time. Farseeing men, realizing a day would come when fertile

soil could no longer be had for a song, wished also to provide

sufficient elbow room for their children at a future day. The

appreciation in land values in a new country provided a further

incentive to the accumulation of large holdings. As a result,

enterprising persons everywhere competed to secure the best tracts.

Towards the close of the seventeenth century the practice of

engrossing lands gained increased momentum. African slavery was

rapidly superseding white indentured servitude as the principal source

of labor supply. The price of tobacco had steadily declined owing to

overproduction, the burdens of the Navigation Acts, and the effects of

European wars. As a result of these conditions, the margin of profit

from the leaf had so decreased that the cheaper labor of slaves and

large-scale production had now become virtually essential to economic

survival. After he had served his indentureship, the white servant

could no longer establish himself as an independent farmer as he had

once done, and the small yeoman now usually felt obliged to sell his

lands to his wealthier neighbor and either become his tenant or

migrate to some other section or colony. Political developments

likewise favored the accumulation of large estates. Through repeated

intermarriage certain families had acquired a very extensive

influence. Members of these families were active in the Governor's

Council or the House of Burgesses and held other high offices as a

matter of course. Their official position often aided them as private

individuals in acquiring lands. Through the presentation of "head

right" certificates, compensation for military services, purchase from

private proprietors, and other ways they obtained domains comprising

thousands of acres. Some carved out what resembled small

principalities. William Fitzhugh of Stafford County owned over 50,000

acres, and by 1732 Robert or "King" Carter of Lancaster County held

some 333,000 acres.

The estates of such men, far from consisting of one compact property,

generally comprised many separate and sometimes widely scattered

tracts, perhaps in half a dozen or more counties. They ranged in size

from a few hundred to thousands of acres. The individual owner

acquired his holdings over a period of years, in what often appeared a

haphazard manner. Not infrequently, a planter, foreseeing the

depletion of his Tidewater lands, engrossed large tracts in the

Piedmont and Valley sections.[1]

[1] Cf. Morton, Louis, _Robert Carter of Nomini Hall: A Virginia

Tobacco Planter of the Eighteenth Century_, pp. 62-87.

Life in the Tidewater during the Golden Age was dominated, to a

remarkable extent, by families possessing vast estates. Not everyone,

it is true, owned such princely domains as the Carters or Fitzhughs,

but men in their station were imbued with a deep sense of their

obligation to society. They sat as justices in the county courts,

served as sheriffs and as colonels of the militia in their counties,

and acted as vestrymen and church wardens in their parishes. They

accepted seriously their duty to preserve the peace and watch over the

less fortunate classes. Because of their wealth and position, their

education, resourcefulness and keen sense of public responsibility,

they were able to influence and to impress their ideals and tastes

upon the community in a measure rarely equalled by a similar

aristocracy.

The great landed proprietors operated their estates in either of two

ways or a combination of the two. They might take full responsibility

themselves, planting tobacco and secondary crops; they could lease

tracts to others to cultivate; or they might do both. Sometimes a man

leased more of his arable lands than he reserved for his own use.

Though disturbed conditions in Europe and the burdens imposed by the

British regulatory system led to repeated attempts to develop other

staples for export, tobacco continued to be the mainstay. Aside from

money crops, however, the great landowners had to supply numerous

foodstuffs and other commodities needed on their plantations.

A proprietor customarily resided on what was generally known as the

"manor plantation."[2] This seat usually served as the nerve center of

the activities of his entire estate, with the other units subordinate

to it. Not infrequently some of the outlying properties were devoted

to producing commodities needed by the manor plantation and by such

other plantations as were engaged in raising tobacco and other

marketable staples. Overseers or stewards managed the units over which

the owner found it difficult to exercise personal supervision. These

men reported to him at regular intervals to receive instructions and

give an account of their stewardship.

[2] In the issue of the _Virginia Gazette_ for May 24, 1751, Thomas

Eldridge of Prince George County advertised the sale of his "Mannor

Plantation" and three other plantations. Such references to manor

plantations appeared frequently in the _Gazette_ and in the wills of

the period.

Though the basis of life was agricultural, the great landowners

discharged a wide variety of other economic functions. They served as

factors for their neighbors, buying their crops, selling them

supplies, and providing them with credit facilities. Many sent vessels

regularly up and down the Chesapeake and the Virginia rivers,

purchasing the produce of others for later marketing. In like fashion

they brought manufactured goods from overseas for sale in the

plantation stores. When European conditions interfered with the import

trade, enterprising men frequently set up grist mills, textile

factories, foundries, and other manufactories on their plantations, to

supply their own and their neighbors' needs.

The great Tidewater proprietors of the Golden Age were, then, no

perfumed courtiers spending their days in idleness and diversion and

consciously seeking to avoid all "taint of trade." In a very real

sense they were capitalists, acute men of business, seriously

concerned with managing their estates, tilling their lands and

disposing of their produce, and eager to reap a profit through trading

with their neighbors. Their ledgers and their correspondence reveal

their energy, shrewdness, and enterprise. In a similar way the

constant stream of letters they wrote the factors who served them in

London, Bristol, and other ports of the mother country show their

vital interest in conditions in the world market.

The planters' preoccupation with such matters does not signify that

they lacked grace of living, nor that they were deficient in

aristocratic ideals. They were determined they should not revert to

barbarism in the wilderness. At no time did they allow themselves to

forget that they were inheritors of British civilization.[3] Taking

the English gentry as their model, they tried, insofar as colonial

conditions would allow, to follow the ways of the country gentlemen of

the homeland. On that pattern they fashioned their manners, their

homes, their diversions; and with a similar aim they sought to

acquire, and instruct their sons in, every branch of knowledge useful

to a gentleman.

[3] Cf. Wright, Louis B., _The First Gentlemen of Virginia_, _passim_.

That it was a constant concern of these planter-businessmen to see

that their children should acquire "polite" accomplishments is clearly

revealed in their papers. In a letter in 1718 Nathaniel Burwell of

"Carter's Grove" deplored his son's inattention to his studies, not

only because an ignorance of arithmetic would hamper him in "the

management of his own affairs," but also because, lacking a broad

basis of knowledge, he would be "unfit for any gentleman's

conversation and therefore a scandalous person and a shame to his

relations, not having one single qualification to recommend him."[4]

In a like spirit William Fitzhugh of "Bedford" in Stafford County

asserted in 1687 that his children had "better be never born than

illbred."[5]

[4] _William and Mary College Quarterly_, Vol. VII, series 1, p. 43.

[5] Stanard, Mary Newton, _Colonial Virginia_, p. 271.

Though a parent sometimes specified that his sons be taught languages,

philosophy, dancing, fencing, and other such "polite" subjects,

practical studies were not neglected. Such subjects as mathematics,

surveying, and law prepared a youth for managing the estate he would

one day inherit and for discharging the obligations to society imposed

by his position. The goal was not professional specialization, but,

rather, an education which would develop fully every side of a

gentleman's character. George Washington expressed this ideal in

referring to plans for the education of his ward, young "Jacky"

Custis, in 1771. Admitting that "a knowledge of books is the basis

upon which other knowledge is to be built," he explained that he did

not think "becoming a mere scholar is a desirable education for a

gentleman."[6] Thus, also, Robert Beverley, father of Harry Beverley

of "Hazelwood" in Caroline County, directed in his will that his son's

guardians should continue the boy's education until he should be

taught "everything necessary for a gentleman to learn."[7]

[6] Hornsby, Virginia Ruth, "Higher Education of Virginians," p. 10.

Typed M.A. Thesis, Library of the College of William and Mary.

[7] _William and Mary College Quarterly_, Vol. XX, series 1, p. 437.

Books provided a ready means of transmitting English standards of life

to the colony. The carefully selected volumes in the manor houses

clearly reveal their owners' aspiration to become "compleat

gentlemen." It was not unusual for the collection of a prosperous

planter to number as many as one or two thousand. Works providing

guidance in the mode of life they admired greatly predominated, though

works of literature were not absent. English "courtesy" and "conduct"

books were on every gentleman's shelves. Richard Allestree's _A

Gentleman's Calling_ and Henry Peacham's _The Compleat Gentleman_, and

other works which portrayed fortitude, prudence, temperance, justice,

liberality, and courtesy as cardinal virtues appear again and again in

the inventories of the period, along with the writings of Castiglione

and other Italians of an earlier day from whom English authors had

derived ideas of courtly conduct.

Most numerous were works stressing a gentleman's religious

obligations. Duty to God and Church was set forth in devotional works

of various kinds, collections of sermons, and theological treatises.

Then came books on historical subjects which offered actual examples

of men of great deeds. There were also many volumes on politics and

statecraft and military manuals, all of them useful in teaching the

larger obligations which a man of wealth owed to society. Guidance in

the practical duties of a great estate was furnished in treatises on

various phases of farming and gardening, manuals of medicine and

surgery, books on surveying and engineering, commentaries on law and

legal procedure and handbooks of architecture.[8]

[8] Cf. Wright, _First Gentlemen_, _passim_.

Naturally, the character of the schooling provided for the growing

generation greatly concerned the Virginia gentlemen. Many, eager to

give their children direct contact with the traditional learning and

culture of the mother country, sent them for a period of years to

English schools.[9] Not infrequently, mere infants were placed under

the protection of relatives and friends in the mother country. As

early as 1683 William Byrd II, then nine years old, and his sister

Susan, about six, were being watched over in English schools by their

Horsmanden grandparents, and plans were making to send over their

little sister, Ursula, aged four. Each of the great "King" Carter's

five boys was sent overseas at an early age. In 1762 John Baylor of

Caroline County, who had received his own education at Putney Grammar

School and Caius College, Cambridge, sent his twelve-year-old son to

Putney, and about the same time put his four young daughters at a

boarding school at Croyden in Kent.[10]

[9] An Englishman visiting Virginia at the close of the eighteenth

century stated, with reference to persons he met who had been educated

abroad before the Revolution, that he "found men leading secluded

lives in the woods of Virginia perfectly _au fait_ as to the literary,

dramatic, and personal gossip of London and Paris." Bernard, John,

_Retrospections of America, 1797-1811_, p. 149.

[10] Stanard, _Colonial Virginia_, p. 290.

The high value placed upon schooling in England is well illustrated in

the attitude of Robert Beverley of "Blandfield" when he prepared to

send his young son, William, abroad in 1773. Confiding the lad for a

season to a tutor in the home of his father-in-law, Landon Carter of

"Sabine Hall," he carefully explained his purpose. "I would recommend

to Mr. Menzies the Latin Lillies Grammar," he wrote Carter, "because,

as no other rudiments are used in any Schools of Eminence, when he

goes to England, he may in part have gotten over the Drudgery of

Education. All I wish to learn him in Virginia is, to read, write, &

cypher, & do as much with his Grammar, as the Time will admit

of...."[11] Planters frequently provided in their wills that their

young sons and daughters be educated abroad. It is likely that an

even larger number of small children would have been sent "home," as

the planters fondly called the mother country, had their parents not

feared the dangers of an ocean voyage and the mortal effects of the

smallpox which was raging in England during the eighteenth century.

[11] Letter of Robert Beverley to Landon Carter, Blandfield, May 19,

1772, in possession of Mrs. William Harrison Wellford of Sabine Hall.

Cf. "Extracts from Diary of Landon Carter in Richmond County,

Virginia"; _William and Mary College Quarterly_, Vol. XIII, series 1,

pp. 160-163.

As an alternative to sending children overseas, the traditional

learning of the English schools could be brought to Virginia by

English-trained tutors and governesses. Well-to-do planters

customarily engaged such persons to instruct their children at home,

even when it was planned to send the youngsters abroad later. They

also employed dancing and music masters to visit their households at

regular intervals. A building near the mansion was generally set aside

as a schoolroom. There the master's children and perhaps those of some

neighboring planters were taught. The young men and women who came

overseas to teach the children of Virginia were honored members of the

households in which they lived. Great care was taken in selecting

them. After a number of young Scotchmen had come to the colony as

tutors during the eighteenth century, it was feared they would "teach

the children the Scotch dialect which they can never wear off."[12]

Throughout the period one finds frequent mention of the need of

suitable instructors in the letters of the planters to their factors

in the mother country. After the middle of the century, tutors were

sometimes secured from Princeton and other American colleges.[13]

[12] _William and Mary College Quarterly_, Vol. XIX, series 1, p. 145.

[13] Robert Andrews, a Pennsylvania youth educated at "the College of

Phileda," served as a tutor at "Rosewell," the Page home in Gloucester

County, for several years, and two young men from Princeton taught the

Carter children at "Nomini Hall." Cf. letter of John Page, Jr., to

John Norton. "Rosewell," September 18, 1772, in Mason, Frances Norton,

_John Norton & Sons_, p. 271. See also page 160.

A goodly number of the youths sent to the English schools enrolled

later at the colleges of Oxford and Cambridge, and others who had been

educated by private tutors were also sent there. Certain families sent

generation after generation of sons to these universities. At

intervals from the time that Ralph Wormeley, the second of that name,

had matriculated at Oriel College, Oxford, in 1665, until the outbreak

of the Revolution, his kinsmen were found in English colleges. Not a

few young Virginians attended the Inns of Court.

In his domestic establishment the planter sought to reproduce as

nearly as he conveniently could the residence of the English gentry

with its gardens, lawns, and parks. Plans of English homes and

gardens, which intelligent workmen or even a layman might adapt, were

accessible in the handbooks of architecture and gardening found in

many of the planters' libraries. In some instances the striking

similarity of detail leaves little doubt that the plans for a

planter's residence derived directly from plates in these books. All

the forms common to the English country architecture of the period

were employed in the plantation residences. Sometimes English master

builders and gardeners were imported to supervise the construction of

the residences and the planting of the grounds.

The vogue for formality in English architecture and landscaping was

mirrored in the arrangement of the Virginia estates. The mansions were

generally placed according to carefully preconceived plans in a formal

setting which nonetheless managed to achieve an air of ease and

naturalness. Balance and symmetry were observed everywhere, with the

buildings, gardens, and extensive lawns forming component parts of one

composition. Walks of brick or oyster shell crossed the grounds in

geometric pattern. If a bowling green or formal garden flanked one

side of the mansion, an orangery or perhaps a park stocked with deer

flanked the other.

English box and other ornamental plants were used with fine effect.

Terraces, elaborate parterres, sunken panels, canals, and dramatic

vistas gave variety to the scene. "Falling gardens" were popular at

the residences situated on high eminences overlooking the great rivers

and marshes.[14] Not infrequently, as at "Blandfield," a ha-ha

provided a note of pleasant surprise for one walking on the lawns.[15]

Graceful garden houses, dovecots, and other miniature structures,

carefully placed, sometimes imparted a fanciful atmosphere to the

whole. Every estate had its orchard, the fruit of which surpassed the

choicest specimens of the homeland. Wildernesses or preserves of

transplanted trees might be found at some distance from the residence,

and sometimes serpentine drives and walks invited one to explore

hidden retreats.

[14] A "falling garden" consisted of a series of very broad terraces,

usually connected by ramps covered with turf, oyster shell or other

surface material to prevent erosion. In some instances the successive

levels were planted in elaborate patterns. In others the whole was

covered with turf. The "falling garden" at "Sabine Hall" retains its

eighteenth-century design intact.

[15] A ha-ha is a boundary to a garden, pleasure-ground, or park of

such a nature as not to interrupt the view from the mansion and may

not be seen until closely approached. According to a French

etymologist, the name is derived from _ha_, an exclamation of

surprise, uttered by one suddenly approaching such a boundary. The

ha-ha consists of a trench, the inner side of which is perpendicular

and faced with a wall; the outer being sloped and turfed. The ha-ha

permitted grazing cattle and sheep to appear on the landscape, and at

the same time held them at a distance from the mansion. In his diary,

George Washington refers, on several occasions, to the ha-has on the

grounds at "Mount Vernon." Cf. Fitzpatrick, John, _The Diaries of

George Washington_, Vol. II, _passim_.

Situated amidst such attractive surroundings, the residences appeared

to fine advantage. Their architectural arrangement contributed much to

their impressiveness. At the same time it was admirably suited to the

peculiar needs of plantation life. The mansion or "great house" was

but the central unit, about which, at carefully spaced intervals,

stood numerous smaller structures, all subsidiary to it. Spoken of

indiscriminately as "offices," these dependent buildings all served

some useful purpose or function in the domestic economy.

The mansion was usually a substantial two-story, rectangular building

of brick, though sometimes it was built of stone or wood. The rather

low-pitched roofs were generally shingled with cypress or slate. Since

many of the activities of the household were carried on in offices

under separate roofs, a central structure approximately seventy-five

feet long and forty-two feet wide was usually regarded as commodious.

The exteriors of these houses were often characterized by an elegant

simplicity achieved through perfection of line and proportion. The

severity of a facade might be relieved by a handsome wooden cornice, a

pedimented hood over the doorway, a string-course and water table of

molded brick, and window and door facings of rubbed brick. Sometimes

pilasters of finely molded brick framed the doorways.

Not infrequently the principal offices, set in advance or in the rear

of the mansion, served as foils to impart greater dignity to it.

Sometimes, as at "Blandfield" and "Mount Airy," the major offices were

connected with the central building by straight or curved lateral

passages. The great house and its dependent structures were generally

placed in such a relation as to form one or more rectangular

courts.[16] The principal offices were often large and contained a

number of rooms.

[16] At "Mount Vernon" the mansion and its wings together composed

three sides of an open square, the main house and its wings closing

the side opposite the open end. At "Stratford Hall" four dependent

structures formed a square court, inside of which the great house

stands. Two offices are set twenty-eight feet in advance of the main

house on the land front. On the water front two others are placed in a

similar relation to it. At "Shirley" the great house and four

principal dependent buildings form a long rectangular court, the

mansion closing the side facing the river.

To one unfamiliar with plantation life, the number and diversity of

the offices about the manor house occasioned astonishment. A Huguenot

exile who visited "Rosegill," the home of Ralph Wormeley, as early as

1686, recorded that the master's residence comprised at least twenty

structures. "When I reached his place," this Frenchman wrote, "I

thought I was entering a rather large village, but later on was told

that all of it belonged to him."[17]

[17] _A Huguenot Exile in Virginia_, ed. and tr. by Gilbert Chinard

(New York, 1934), p. 142. In writing of Maryland early in the

eighteenth century, Sir John Oldmixon said: "Both here [Maryland] and

there [Virginia] the _English_ live at large at their several

Plantations, which hinders the Increase of Towns; indeed every

Plantation, is a little Town of itself, and can subsist itself with

Provisions and Necessaries, every considerable Planter's Warehouse

being like a Shop...." Oldmixon, John, _British Empire in America_

(second edition, 1741), Vol. I, p. 339. Cf. Kimball, Fiske, _Domestic

Architecture_, _passim_.

Offices near the great house were utilized as counting-rooms,

schoolrooms, and sleeping quarters for the sons of the family as well

as for a variety of other purposes. The kitchen, wash-house, dairy,

smoke-house, and other offices intimately connected with the processes

of housekeeping were usually set farther away in order to keep the

mansion cool in summer and free it of the noise and odors of

cooking.[18]

[18] A historian who described the Virginia residences at the

beginning of the eighteenth century stated that "All their Drudgeries

of Cookery, Washing, Daries, &c. are perform'd in Offices detacht from

the Dwelling-Houses, which by this means are kept more cool and

Sweet." Cf. Beverley, Robert, _The History and Present State of

Virginia_, Book IV, p. 53.

Within the manor house the lower floors were usually devoted entirely

to social purposes. Halls and chambers were generally finely panelled

in native pine or walnut, and the symmetry of the paneling, the deeply

recessed windows, and the excellent proportion of the doors and

mantels imparted dignity and beauty to the rooms. Frequently the

effect was heightened by fine carving, and occasionally the pink or

orange tones of mantels of sienna marble lent a pleasing touch of

color.

In many of the apartments there were fine cornices, modillions, and

dentils. Delicately fluted pilasters often flanked windows and doors.

Elaborately carved cornice and mantel friezes and frets represented

the most skilled craftsmanship of the period. Sometimes, as at

"Carter's Grove," the miniature carving of the friezes was of

exquisite beauty. Motifs such as the egg and dart, the Wall of Troy,

and the Tudor rose were employed with fine effect.

In the halls ornamentation was frequently given freer scope than

elsewhere. The wide passageways which extended through the houses were

customarily broken midway by arches of fine proportions. The usual

focal point of interest in the hallways, however, was the stairs, the

sweep of which was often majestic. Carved and hidden newel posts were

common, and sometimes the pattern of the posts reappeared in elaborate

friezes below the landing. Twist-carved balusters were placed on the

steps, and running floral and foliated carving decorated the risers or

step-ends of many of the stairs.

For these homes the Virginia aristocrats imported furniture, china,

plate, and other furnishings from England and France. Their letters to

factors in the homeland were filled with descriptions of the articles

wanted, and frequently specified that items must be in the latest

London fashion. Choice pieces of walnut and mahogany, expensive

mirrors, and carpets and hangings of the best quality graced their

drawing rooms. Harpsichords, spinets, and other fine instruments stood

in many homes, and portraits of members of the family, some by the

best artists of the day, hung on their walls. In the dining rooms,

fine crystal and plate emblazoned with the family crest gleamed on

polished sideboards and tables.

Though they sometimes maintained residences at Williamsburg for the

court season, the Virginia great were rarely absentee landlords in the

sense that planters in other colonies were. Rather, they were country

gentlemen residing on their manor plantations, and, as we have seen,

seriously interested in improving their homes and domains. A family

was customarily identified by reference to its seat. "Epping Forest,"

"Marmion," "Berkeley," "Chelsea," "Elsing Green," and the other

musical names by which the homes were called, impart a romantic and

picturesque flavor to the literature of the region, and reveal the

strong hold retained over men's affections by the mother country.

Since no land in the Tidewater was cleared until it was to be

utilized for tobacco culture, and since discarded fields were allowed

to grow up in thickets, the plantation establishments were generally

located at a considerable distance from one another and separated by

heavily wooded tracts.[19]

[19] The Tidewater plantation economy had spread into the Piedmont

section prior to the American Revolution. A paroled British officer

writing of his situation in Albemarle County in 1779, said: "The house

that we reside in is situated upon an eminence, commanding a prospect

of near thirty miles around it, and the face of the country appears an

immense forest, interspersed with various plantations, four or five

miles distant from each other; on these there is a dwelling-house in

the center, with kitchens, smoke-house, and out-houses detached, and

from the various buildings, each plantation has the appearance of a

small village; at some little distance from the houses, are peach and

apple orchards, &c. and scattered over the plantations are the negroes

huts and tobacco-houses, which are large built of wood, for the cure

of that article." Cf. Anburey, Thomas, _Travels Through the Interior

Parts of America_, Vol. II, p. 187.

Set in a land abounding in excellent house sites, the planters' homes

generally stood near the bank of one of the great rivers or upon some

natural eminence. In the former case these houses had two fronts, a

land and a water entrance. The approach from the public highway

generally led through a wide avenue of trees, perhaps a mile or more

in length, or the house might be shielded from the public gaze by a

park of stately beeches or poplars. Since overland routes often

presented serious difficulties, the Virginians made highroads of their

rivers and creeks, and the side of the mansion facing the water

generally constituted its true front. This is evidenced by the fact

that one usually ascended the stairs from the water side. Isolated as

the homes were, the Virginians were able to enjoy the seclusion so

greatly prized by the gentry of the mother country, and they developed

to a high degree the hospitable and generous traits and the love of

outdoor sports that have usually characterized country squires.[20]

[20] A British observer reported in 1779 that "... before the war, the

hospitality of the country was such, that travellers always stopt at a

plantation when they wanted to refresh themselves and their horses,

where they always met with the most courteous treatment, and were

supplied with every thing gratuitously; and if any neighbouring

planters heard of any gentleman being at one of these ordinaries, they

would send a negroe with an invitation to their own house." Cf.

Anburey, _Travels Through the Interior Parts of America_, Vol. II, p.

198. This same traveller described the hospitality shown the guests at

one of the James River plantations. "I spent a few days at Colonel

Randolph's, at Tuckahoe, at whose house the usual hospitality of the

country prevailed," he wrote. "It is built on a rising ground, having

a most beautiful and commanding prospect of James River; on one side

is Tuckahoe, which being the Indian name of that creek, he named his

plantation Tuckahoe after it; his house seems to be built solely to

answer the purposes of hospitality, which being constructed in a

different manner than in most other countries; I shall describe it to

you: It is in the form of an H, and has the appearance of two houses,

joined by a large saloon; each wing has two stories, and four large

rooms on a floor; in one the family reside, and the other is reserved

solely for visitors: the saloon that unites them, is of a considerable

magnitude, and on each side are doors; the ceiling is lofty, and to

these they principally retire in the Summer, being but little

incommoded by the sun, and by the doors of each of the houses, and

those of the saloon being open, there is a constant circulation of

air; they are furnished with four sophas, two on each side, besides

chairs, and in the center there is generally a chandelier; these

saloons answer the two purposes of a cool retreat from the scorching

and sultry heat of the climate, and of an occasional ball-room. The

outhouses are detached at some distance, that the house may be open to

the air on all sides." _Ibid._, p. 208.

The constant activity that centered about the great house is clearly

reflected in the journals, letters, and account books of the day.

Through their pages may be seen the great planter-businessmen, the

members of their families, the overseers and stewards, the free white

artisans, the Negro slaves, and the indentured servants moving about

their daily tasks. The master of the plantation in a counting room

near his mansion balances accounts, writes letters to his factors in

England, or converses with the overseers and stewards from his other

plantations who have come for instructions regarding their work. The

children of the household and their tutor pass to and from the office

used as a schoolroom. A ship from the homeland touches at the

plantation landing and its captain comes ashore to bring letters and

the latest news from the mother country, and perchance to dine at the

planter's table. Visitors from neighboring plantations or from

adjoining counties arrive in sloops or in coaches or sedans. Rooms

reserved for guests are rarely empty and almost any event serves as

the excuse for a celebration. A peripatetic dancing master arrives,

the children of the neighborhood gather, and an informal dance is held

after they have been singly instructed. Even passing strangers are

accorded hospitable entertainment and treated as welcome guests. The

planter and his family frequently ride out in a coach or chair for "an

airing" or to call upon neighbors or relatives. On Sunday, if the

weather be good, he takes his family by water to attend services at

the parish church. Not infrequently a neighbor's servant arrives

bearing venison or some other delicacy for the master's table.

Countless articles are bought or taken from the plantation stores. In

the smith's shop nails and other articles are forged for plantation

use, and the chair of a neighbor is mended or his plows pointed.

Provisions are sent to the outlying plantations and supplies needed

for the home place brought from them. In buildings near the mansion,

tobacco is cured and prized. Hogsheads are rolled to the wharf to be

shipped.

Such was the nature of the world about "Nomini Hall," the manor house

of Robert Carter III in Westmoreland County, to which Philip Vickers

Fithian, a young Princeton-bred theological student, went as a tutor

to the children of the household in 1773.

CHAPTER TWO

Philip Fithian And The Carter Family

During his residence at "Nomini Hall" from October, 1773, to October,

1774, Philip Fithian recorded his impressions of the life about him in

a daily journal and in letters to relatives and friends. These

impressions constitute a detailed and illuminating account. The

civilization he described differed in many respects from that he had

known in New Jersey. His austere Presbyterian training caused him to

look with disfavor or misgiving upon many of the gay diversions and

other social customs of Virginia. Yet he was open-minded to an unusual

degree and not unsympathetic to the people among whom he lived. His

freshness of viewpoint led him to comment upon various features of

Virginia civilization which would doubtless have escaped the attention

of one more familiar with them. He admired many aspects of Southern

life and for the members of the Carter household Fithian developed a

genuine and lasting fondness. The account possesses both vivacity and

charm.

At "Nomini Hall" Philip Fithian found himself in an excellent

observation post. Robert Carter, its owner, was the scion of one of

the wealthiest and most influential Tidewater families. His

great-grandfather, John Carter, had emigrated to Virginia from England

in 1649. Acquiring some 13,500 acres in the Northern Neck, the fertile

region between the Rappahannock and Potomac rivers, John Carter had

established his home "Corotoman" on the Rappahannock in Lancaster

County. Becoming ere long a successful planter and businessman, Carter

served first as a Burgess and then as a member of the governor's

Council.

Robert or "King" Carter, son of the emigrant, so eclipsed his father

that he has usually been regarded as founder of the family in

Virginia. Bold, capable, and acquisitive, "King" Carter strove

ceaselessly to expand the family fortunes. By strict attention to

business and a close regard for his prerogatives as agent of the

Fairfaxes, the proprietors of the Northern Neck, he ultimately became

the richest and perhaps the most powerful man of his day in

Virginia.[21] First as a Burgess and then as a member and President of

the Council, he exerted a political influence that contributed greatly

to the management of his private affairs. Realizing earlier than most

the need future generations would have for fresh lands, he obtained

for his progeny altogether some 333,000 acres.

[21] Cf. Wright, Louis B., _Letters of Robert Carter, 1720-1727_ (San

Marino, 1940), p. viii.

Under the custom of primogeniture, Carter arranged that the bulk of

his lands, including "Corotoman," should go to his eldest son, John

Carter II. He, nonetheless, saw to it that his other sons, Robert,

Landon, Charles, and George should have ample estates. Robert Carter

II, however, died a few months before his father, leaving a young son,

Robert III, and a daughter, Elizabeth. A short time after "King"

Carter's death his surviving sons procured a special legislative

enactment investing the share of the estate intended for the dead son

in the young grandson. When Robert Carter III reached his majority,

therefore, he would become master of more than seventy thousand acres.

The young boy's uncles, John, Landon, and Charles Carter, acted as his

guardians. As a result of his mother's early second marriage to

Colonel John Lewis, he lived at the latter's manor plantation, "Warner

Hall" in Gloucester County. When the lad was nine, he was sent to the

College of William and Mary. Nothing further is definitely known of

how his youth was spent.

On reaching twenty-one Robert at once began preparations for a trip to

England where he remained two years. The purpose of this visit is not

known. It is probable, however, that he was following the example of

his grandfather, his father, and the other sons of "King" Carter who

had all completed their education in the mother country. Indeed the

records of the Inner Temple reveal that he was admitted to the

privileges and assumed the agreeable duties of a member of that august

legal society a few months after he arrived there.[22] Whatever his

motives, though, it is unlikely that a spirited young man, possessed

of ample means and free of parental restraint, would bury himself

entirely within musty college walls. Reports at home had it that he

spent his time in idleness and gay diversions. A portrait painted at

this time by a fashionable artist, probably in the studio of Sir

Joshua Reynolds, shows him arrayed in a fine doublet of silk and a

high lace collar, with a mask in one hand as if to indicate he was

about to hasten away to some masquerade.

[22] Cf. Jones, E. Alfred, _American Members of the Inns of Court_, p.

41.

Whatever his youthful follies may have been, Robert Carter possessed a

gentle and thoughtful nature. As he matured, he became increasingly a

serious man of business and of scholarly and cultivated tastes.

Returning to Virginia in 1751, he soon married and settled down to the

life of a country squire at "Nomini Hall," the manor house his father

had built in Westmoreland County.

On a visit to Maryland, Carter had met Frances Anne Tasker, the

sixteen-year-old daughter of one of the foremost citizens of that

colony. Struck by the beauty, good sense, and fortune of the young

girl, he had secured her consent to become his wife. Frances Tasker

Carter was an uncommon person. Notwithstanding the numerous children

she had already borne her husband when Philip Fithian entered her

household, she was still beautiful, elegant, and youthful looking. She

was also well-informed and frequently surprised Fithian with the

breadth of her interests. Ever cheerful and agreeable, she managed the

household with fine success and carefully trained her seventeen

children.

Besides a handsome dowry, Frances Tasker brought her husband a family

influence that proved of great assistance in both his public and

private career. Benjamin Tasker, her father, who had wide commercial

connections, had served for thirty-two years as a member and President

of the Council of Maryland, and for a period as acting-Governor. Her

mother, Anne Bladen Tasker, was the daughter of William Bladen who had

been successfully Secretary and Attorney-General of that colony.

Thomas Bladen, her mother's brother, a former governor of Maryland,

had removed to England and become a member of Parliament for Old

Sarum, where he was now in an excellent position to promote the

interests of his American relatives.[23]

[23] Sisters of Anne Bladen Tasker and Thomas Bladen had married

Daniel Dulany, Samuel Ogle, and Christopher Lowndes, all men of

important political and financial connections in their world.

Robert Carter led a busy life at "Nomini Hall." To utilize profitably

the resources of an estate of seventy thousand acres was a task that

demanded foresight and planning. He customarily cultivated as many as

a dozen large plantations at once, and it was necessary that the

operations on the several units be carefully integrated. Though

tobacco constituted the crop of first importance on his estate, entire

plantations were sometimes devoted to producing grain stuffs and

supplies needed at "Nomini Hall" and on the other plantations. From

time to time, too, Carter sought to develop other money crops which

might supplement the constantly dwindling profits from tobacco. The

preparation of new grounds to replace discarded fields constituted a

laborious task that had to be coped with at intervals. He set up and

equipped so many plantations that he resorted at one time to the signs

of the zodiac for names for them.

Journal and Letters of Philip Vickers Fithian: A Plantation Tutor of the Old Dominion, 1773-1774. · 第 1 / 24 段