In the fields of Brienne, where Napoleon was educated by the old

Monarchy, he gave, in the latter's honour, the last and most admirable

of his blood-stained tourneys[454]. Favoured by the Carbonari, Joachim

at one time wished to declare himself the liberator of Italy, at

another hoped to divide her between himself and Bonaparte become

victorious. One morning, a courier brought to Naples the news of the

entry of the Russians into Paris. Madame Murat was still in bed and

Madame Récamier was talking with her, seated at her pillow; an enormous

pile of letters and newspapers was laid upon the bed. Among the latter

was my pamphlet, _De Bonaparte and des Bourbons._ The Queen exclaimed:

"Ah, here is a work by M. de Chateaubriand; we will read it together."

And she went on opening her letters.

Madame Récamier took the pamphlet and, after casting her eyes over it

at random, placed it back on the bed and said to the Queen:

"Madame, you shall read it alone, I am obliged to return home."

Napoleon was relegated to Elba; the Allies, with rare cleverness, had

placed him on the coast of Italy. Murat learnt that they were trying

at the Congress of Vienna to despoil him of the States which he had

nevertheless bought so dear; he came to a secret understanding with his

brother-in-law, who had become his neighbour. One is always surprised

that the Napoleons should have relations: who knows the name of

Arrhidæus[455], the brother of Alexander? In the course of the year

1814, the King and Queen of Naples gave an entertainment at Pompeii;

an excavation was conducted to the sound of music: the ruins which

Caroline and Joachim had dug up did not apprize them of their own ruin;

on the last borders of prosperity we hear but the last strains of the

dream that passes away.

At the time of the Peace of Paris, Murat formed part of the Alliance,

the Milanese having been handed back to Austria: the Neapolitans

retired within the Roman Legations. Murat, perplexed, having changed

his interest, sallied forth from the Legations and marched with forty

thousand men towards Upper Italy to make a diversion in favour of

Napoleon[456]. At Parma, he refused the conditions which the affrighted

Austrians offered him once more: to each of us comes a critical moment;

ill chosen or well, it decides our future. The Baron de Frimont[457]

forced back Murat's troops, took the offensive and drove them before

him fighting to Macerata[458]. The Neapolitans left the ranks; their

King and general returned to Naples[459], accompanied by four lancers.

He went to his wife and said:

"Madame, I have not been able to die."

The next day, a boat took him in the direction of the island of Ischia;

he joined at sea a smack carrying a few officers of his staff, and set

sail with them for France.

[Sidenote: Murat's flight.]

Madame Murat, left behind alone, displayed admirable presence of mind.

The Austrians were on the point of appearing: in the passing from one

authority to another, an interval of anarchy might have been filled

with disorders. The Regent did not precipitate her retreat; she allowed

the German soldier to occupy the town and had her galleries lighted up

at night. The people, seeing the lights from the outside, thinking that

the Queen was still there, remained quiet. Meantime Caroline left by a

secret stair-case and went on board ship. Seated on the poop, she saw

gleaming on the bank the illuminated, but deserted palace from which

she was departing, an image of the dazzling dream which she had had

during her sleep in the realm of the fairies.

Caroline met the frigate which was bringing Ferdinand[460] back. The

ship of the fugitive Queen fired a salute, the ship of the recalled

King did not return it: Prosperity does not recognise her sister

Adversity. Thus do illusions, faded for the one, begin anew for the

other; thus do the fickle destinies of humanity pass each other in the

winds and on the billows: smiling or baleful, one and the same abyss

bears them or engulfs them.

Murat was achieving his career elsewhere. On the 25th of May 1815,

at ten o'clock at night, he landed in the Golfe Juan, where his

brother-in-law had landed. Fortune made Joachim play the parody of

Napoleon. The latter did not believe in the strength of misfortune,

nor in the succour which it brings to great minds: he forbade the

dethroned King the approach to Paris; he consigned to the lazar-house

this man stricken with the plague of the conquered; he shut him up in

a country-house called _Plaisance_, near Toulon. He would have done

better to show less dread of a contagion with which he had himself been

seized: who knows what a soldier like Murat might have altered in the

Battle of Waterloo?

The King of Naples, in his trouble, wrote to Fouché on the 19th of June

1815:

"I shall reply to those who accuse me of commencing

hostilities too soon that it was done at the Emperor's

formal demand and that, for three months, he did not cease

to reassure me as to his sentiments by accrediting ministers

to me and writing to me that he relied on me and would

never abandon me. It is only when people saw that I had

lost, together with the throne, the means of continuing the

powerful diversion which had lasted three months that they

tried to mislead public opinion by insinuating that I acted

on my own behalf and without the Emperor's knowledge."

There existed a generous and beautiful woman; when she arrived in

Paris, Madame Récamier received her and would not abandon her in times

of misfortune. Among the papers which she has left behind were found

two letters from Murat written in the month of June 1819; they are

useful to the study of history:

[Sidenote: Letters from Murat.]

6 _June_ 1815.

"I have lost the fairest existence for France's sake; I have

fought for the Emperor; it is for his cause that my wife and

my children are in captivity. The country is in danger, I

offer my services; they put off accepting them. I know not

if I am free or a prisoner. I must needs be involved in the

Emperor's ruin if he falls, and they deprive me of the means

of serving him and serving my own cause. I ask their reasons;

they reply obscurely and I am unable clearly to establish

my position. At one time I cannot go to Paris, where my

presence would injure the Emperor, and I must not join the

army, where my presence would too much attract the attention

of the soldiers. What am I to do? Wait: that is what they

reply. On the other hand, I am told that I am not forgiven

for having abandoned the Emperor last year, whereas letters

from Paris said, when I was recently fighting for France,

'_Every one here is delighted with the King._' The Emperor

wrote to me, _I rely on you, do you rely on me, I shall never

abandon you._' King Joseph wrote to me, '_The Emperor orders

me to write to you to move rapidly upon the Alps._' And

when, on arriving, I display generous sentiments and offer

to fight for France, I am sent into the Alps. Not a word of

consolation is addressed to one who never did him any other

wrong than to rely too greatly on generous sentiments which

he never entertained for me.

"My friend, I come to ask you to inform me of the opinion

of France and the army regarding me. A man must know how to

endure all and my courage will make me rise superior to every

misfortune. All is lost save honour; I have lost the throne,

but I have preserved all my glory; I have been abandoned

by my soldiers, who were victorious in every fight, but I

have never been beaten. The desertion of twenty thousand men

placed me at the mercy of my enemies; a fisher's bark saved

me from captivity, and a merchant ship cast me in three days

on the coasts of France."

"Near TOULON, 18 _June_ 1815.

"I have just received your letter. I cannot describe to

you the different sensations which it made me experience.

I have been able for a moment to forget my misfortunes. I

am occupied only with my friend, whose noble and generous

soul comes to console me and show me its sorrow. Reassure

yourself: all is lost, but honour remains; my glory will

survive all my misfortunes, and my courage will be able to

make me rise superior to all the rigours of my destiny: have

no fear on that score. I have lost my throne and family

unmoved; but ingratitude has revolted me. I have lost all for

France, for her Emperor, by his order, and to-day he makes

it a crime in me to have done so. He refuses me permission

to fight and revenge myself, and I am not free to choose my

own retreat: can you conceive all my unhappiness? What can I

do? What decision can I take? I am a Frenchman and a father:

as a Frenchman, I must serve my country; as a father, I must

go to share my children's lot: honour lays upon me the duty

of fighting and nature tells me that I must belong to my

children. Which am I to obey? Cannot I satisfy both? Shall I

be allowed to listen to either? Already the Emperor refuses

me armies; and will Austria grant me the means to go to join

my children? Shall I ask them of her, I who have never been

willing to treat with her ministers? There is my situation:

give me advice. I shall await your reply, the Duc d'Otrante's

and Lucien's, before taking a determination. Consult opinion

well as to what it is thought right for me to do, for I am

free in the choice of my retreat; they are returning to the

past and making it a crime in me to have, by order, lost my

throne, when my family is languishing in captivity. Advise

me; listen to the voice of honour, to that of nature, and,

as an impartial judge, have the courage to write to me what

I am to do. I shall await your reply on the road between

Marseilles and Lyons."

Putting aside the personal vanities and the illusions which issue from

the throne, even from a throne on which one has been seated but for a

moment, these letters show us the idea which Murat entertained of his

brother-in-law.

Bonaparte lost the Empire a second time; Murat was a shelterless

vagrant on the same sands which have since beheld the roamings of the

Duchesse de Berry. Some smugglers consented, on the 22nd of August

1815, to put him and three others across to Corsica. A tempest greeted

him: the felucca which plies between Bastia and Toulon took him on

board. Scarce had he left his shore-boat, when she split. Landing

at Bastia on the 25th of August, he hastened to hide himself in the

village of Vescovato, at old Colonna-Ceccaldi's[461]. Two hundred

officers joined him with General Franceschetti[462]. He marched on

Ajaccio: Bonaparte's maternal town alone still cared for her son; of

all his Empire, Napoleon owned only his cradle. The garrison of the

citadel saluted Murat and wished to proclaim him King of Corsica: he

refused; he thought only the sceptre of the Two Sicilies equal to his

greatness. His aide-de-camp Macirone[463] brought him from Paris the

decision of Austria, by virtue of which he was to give up the title of

King and retire at will to Bohemia or Moldavia:

"It is too late," replied Joachim; "my dear Macirone, the die is cast."

On the 28th of September, Murat sailed for Italy; seven bottoms were

laden with his two hundred and fifty followers: he had scorned to have

for his kingdom the narrow mother-land of the immense man; full of

hope, led away by the example of a fortune higher than his own, he set

out from the island whence Napoleon had issued to take possession of

the world: it is not the same spots, but similar geniuses, that produce

the same destinies.

A storm dispersed the flotilla; Murat was cast ashore, on the 8th

of October, in the Gulf of Santa Eufemia, almost at the moment when

Bonaparte was approaching the Rock of St. Helena[464].

Of his seven praams, only two were left to him, including his own.

Landing with some thirty men, he tried to stir up the population of the

coast; the inhabitants fired on his band. The two praams stood out to

sea; Murat was betrayed. He ran to a stranded boat, tried to float it;

the boat would not move. Surrounded and captured, Murat, insulted by

the same mob that once used to shout itself hoarse with "Long live King

Joachim!" was taken to Pizzo Castle. Upon him and his companions were

seized insensate proclamations: they showed with what dreams men delude

themselves to their last hour.

Unruffled in his prison, Murat said:

"I shall have only my Kingdom of Naples; my cousin Ferdinand will keep

the second Sicily."

[Sidenote: Death of Murat.]

And at that moment a military commission was condemning Murat to

death. When he heard his sentence, his firmness deserted him for a few

instants; he shed tears and exclaimed:

"I am Joachim King of the Two Sicilies!"

He forgot that Louis XVI. had been King of France, the Duc d'Enghien

grandson of the Grand Condé, and Napoleon arbiter of Europe: Death

reckons as nothing what we may have been.

A priest is always a priest, say and do what we will; he comes and

restores its failing strength to an intrepid heart. On the 13th of

October 1815, Murat, after writing to his wife, was taken to a room in

Pizzo Castle, renewing in his romantic person the brilliant or tragic

adventures of the middle ages. Twelve soldiers, who perhaps had served

under him, awaited him, drawn up in two lines. Murat saw them load

their muskets, refused to let his eyes be bandaged, and himself, as an

experienced captain, chose the post where the bullets could best hit

him.

When aim had been taken at him, at the moment of the fire, he said:

"Men, spare the face; aim at my heart!"

He fell, holding in his hands the portraits of his wife and of his

children: those portraits used before to adorn the hilt of his

sword[465]. It was but one affair the more which the gallant man had

settled with life.

The different manners of death of Napoleon and Murat preserve the

characters of their lives.

Murat, so magnificent, was buried without state at Pizzo, in one of

those Christian churches in whose charitable bosom all ashes are

mercifully received.

Madame Récamier, returning to France, passed through Rome at the moment

when the Pope returned[466]. In another portion of these Memoirs, you

accompanied Pius VII., set at liberty at Fontainebleau, to the gates of

St Peter's[467]. Joachim, still alive, was about to disappear, and Pius

VII. was reappearing. Behind them, Napoleon was struck; the conqueror's

hand let the King fall and raised the Pontiff.

[Sidenote: Pope Pius VII.]

Pius VII. was received with shouts which shook the ruins of the city

of ruins. The horses were taken from his carriage and the crowd drew

him to the steps of the Church of the Apostles. The Holy Father saw

nothing, heard nothing; rapt in mind, his thought was far from the

earth; only his hand rose over the people from the tender habit of

blessing. He entered the basilica to the sound of trumpets, to the

singing of the _Te Deum_, to the acclamations of the Swiss of the

religion of William Tell. The thuribles wafted perfumes to him which he

did not inhale; he would not be carried on the _sedia gestatoria_ under

the shadow of the canopy and the palms; he walked like a shipwrecked

man fulfilling his vow to Our Lady of Succour, and charged by Christ

with a mission which was to renew the face of the earth. He was clad

in a white robe; his hair, which had remained black in spite of

misfortune and years, formed a contrast with the anchorite's pallor.

On arriving at the Tomb of the Apostles, he prostrated himself: he

remained, without movement and as though dead, plunged in the depths of

the counsels of Providence. The emotion was profound; Protestants who

witnessed the scene wept scalding tears.

What a subject for meditation! An infirm, decrepit priest,

strengthless, defenseless, taken from the Quirinal, carried captive

to the heart of Gaul; a martyr, who awaited naught save his tomb,

delivered from the hands of Napoleon, who pressed the globe, resuming

the empire of an indestructible world, when the walls of a prison

beyond the seas were being prepared for that formidable gaoler of the

nations and the kings!

Pius VII. outlived the Emperor; he saw the master-pieces, the faithful

friends which had accompanied him in his exile, brought back to the

Vatican. On his return from persecution, the septuagenarian Pontiff,

prostrate beneath the cupola of St. Peter's, displayed at the same time

all the weakness of man and the grandeur of God.

On descending the Savoy Alps, Madame Récamier, at Pont-de-Beauvoisin,

found the White Flag and the white cockade. The Corpus Christi

processions, passing through the villages, seemed to have come back

with the Most Christian King. In Lyons, the traveller arrived in the

midst of a Restoration festival. The enthusiasm was unfeigned. At

the head of the rejoicings stood Alexis de Noailles[468] and Colonel

Clary, Joseph Bonaparte's brother-in-law. All that is told to-day of

the coldness and gloom with which the Legitimacy was received at the

First Restoration is a shameless falsehood. Joy was general in the

different sections of opinion, even among the Conventionals, even among

the Imperialists, excepting the soldiers: their noble pride suffered

from those reverses. Nowadays, when the weight of military government

is no longer felt, when vanities are aroused, it is necessary to deny

the facts, because they do not accord with the theories of the moment.

It suits the purpose of a system that the nation should have received

the Bourbons with abhorrence and that the Restoration should have been

a time of oppression and misery. This leads to melancholy reflections

on human nature. If the Bourbons had the inclination and the strength

to oppress, they might have looked forward to a long retention of the

throne. Bonaparte's violence and injustice, dangerous to his power

though they appeared, in reality served him: men are appalled by

iniquities, but manufacture a great idea out of them; they are disposed

to regard as a superior being one who places himself above the laws.

Madame de Staël, who arrived in Paris before Madame Récamier, had

written to her several times; only the following note reached her:

"PARIS, 20 _May_ 1814.

"I am ashamed to be in Paris without you, dear angel of my

life: tell me your plans. Would you like me to go before you

to Coppet, where I am going to stay for four months? After

so many sufferings, my sweetest prospect is yourself, and

my heart is for ever devoted to you. One word as to your

departure and arrival. I await that note to know what I shall

do. I am writing to you to Rome, Naples, etc."

[Sidenote: Madame de Genlis.]

Madame de Genlis, who had never had any relations with Madame Récamier,

was eager to become better acquainted with her. I find a passage

expressing a wish which, had it been realized, would have spared the

reader my story:

"11 _October._

"Here, madame, is the book which I had the honour to promise

you. I have marked the things which I should like you to

read....

"Come, madame, to tell me your story 'in these words,' as

they do in the novels. Then I will afterwards ask you to

write it in the form of recollections, which will be full of

interest, because, in your earliest youth, you were cast,

with a bewitching face and a mind full of shrewdness and

penetration, into the midst of those whirlpools of errors

and follies; because you have seen everything; and because,

having preserved, during those stormy times, your religious

sentiment, a pure soul, a stainless life, an impressionable

and loyal heart, possessing neither envy nor hateful

passions, you will depict everything in the truest colours.

You are one of the phenomena of these days, and certainly the

most amiable.

"You shall show me your 'Recollections;' my old experience

will offer some advice, and you will write a useful and

delightful work. Do not come and answer, 'I am not capable,'

etc., etc. I will permit you no commonplaces; they are

unworthy of your intelligence. You can cast back your eyes

over the past without remorse: this is, at all times, the

fairest of our privileges; in the days in which we live,

it is an inestimable one. Avail yourself of it for the

instruction of the young person[469] whom you are bringing

up; it will be the greatest boon you can show her.

"Adieu, madame, permit me to tell you that I love you and

that I embrace you with all my heart."

Now that Madame Récamier has returned to Paris[470], I will go back for

some time to my first guides. The Queen of Naples, uneasy about the

resolutions of the Congress of Vienna, wrote to Madame Récamier to find

her a man who would be capable of handling her interests in Vienna.

Madame Récamier applied to Benjamin Constant and asked him to draw up a

memorandum. This circumstance had the most unfortunate influence upon

the author of the memorandum; a stormy sentiment was the result of

an interview. Under the empire of this sentiment, Benjamin Constant,

already a violent Anti-Bonapartist, as is manifest in the _Esprit

de conquête_[471], allowed opinions to overflow the course of which

was soon changed by events. Thence arose a reputation for political

fickleness baleful to statesmen.

Madame Récamier, while admiring Bonaparte, had remained true to her

hatred against the oppressor of our liberties and the enemy of Madame

de Staël. As for what concerned herself, she did not give it a thought

and she made light of her exile. The letters which Benjamin Constant

wrote to her at this time will serve as a study, if not of the human

heart, at least of the human head: there we see all that could be

made of a passion by an ironical and romantic, serious and poetical

intelligence. Rousseau is not more genuine, but he mingles with his

imaginary loves a sincere melancholy and a real reverie.

Meanwhile, Bonaparte had landed at Cannes; the perturbation due to his

approach was beginning to make itself felt. Benjamin Constant wrote

Madame Récamier this note:

"Forgive me if I avail myself of circumstances to trouble

you; but the opportunity is too favourable. My fate will be

decided in four or five days surely; for, though you used

to like not to think so, in order to have to show me less

interest, I am certainly, with Marmont, Chateaubriand and

Lainé, one of the four most compromised men in France. It

is, therefore, certain that, if we do not triumph, I shall

in a week be either an outlaw or a fugitive, or in a cell or

shot. Grant me then, during the two or three days which will

precede the battle, as much of your time and as many of your

hours as you can. If I die, you will be glad to have done me

this kindness and you would be sorry to have afflicted me. My

feeling for you is my life; one sign of indifference hurts me

more than, four days hence, my sentence of death could do.

And, when I feel that danger is a means of obtaining a sign

of interest from you, I derive from it nothing but joy.

"Were you pleased with my article, and have you heard what

people say of it?"

Benjamin Constant was right, he was as much compromised as I: attached

to Bernadotte, he had served against Napoleon; he had published his

work _De l'esprit de conquête_, in which he handled the "tyrant"

more roughly than I handled him in my pamphlet _De Bonaparte et des

Bourbons._ He crowned his perils by talking in the newspapers.

On the 19th of March, at the moment when Bonaparte was at the gates of

the Capital, he had the firmness to affix his signature to an article

in the _Journal des Débats_ ending with this phrase:

"I shall not, like a wretched turn-coat, go creeping from one power

to the other, covering infamy with sophisms and stammering out profane

words to redeem a shameful life."

Benjamin Constant wrote to her who inspired him with these noble

sentiments:

"I am glad that my article has appeared; at least none can

now doubt my sincerity. Here is a note which some one wrote

to me after reading it: if I were to receive a similar one

from somebody else, I should be gay upon the scaffold."

Madame Récamier always reproached herself for having unintentionally

exercised so great an influence over an honourable destiny. Nothing,

in fact, is more distressing than to inspire those fickle characters

with those energetic resolutions which they are incapable of keeping.

On the 20th of March, Benjamin Constant belied his article of the 19th.

After driving a little distance away from town, he returned to Paris

and allowed himself to be caught by Bonaparte's seductions. Appointed a

State councillor[472], he obliterated his generous pages by working at

the draft of the Additional Act.

From that time forward, he bore a secret wound at his heart; he no

longer with assurance broached the thought of posterity; his spoilt and

saddened life contributed in no small degree to his death. God preserve

us from triumphing over the miseries from which the loftiest natures

are not exempt! Heaven does not give us talents without attaching

infirmities to them: expiations offered to foolishness and envy. The

weaknesses of a superior man are the black victims which antiquity

sacrificed to the infernal gods, and still they never allow themselves

to be disarmed.

[Sidenote: Madame de Krüdener.]

Madame Récamier spent the Hundred Days in France, where Queen Hortense

invited her to stay; the Queen of Naples, on the other hand, offered

her an asylum in Italy. The Hundred Days passed. Madame de Krüdener

accompanied the Allies, who arrived once more in Paris. She had fallen

from novel-writing into mysticism; she wielded a great empire over the

mind of the Tsar of Russia.

Madame de Krüdener lodged in a house in the Faubourg Saint-Honoré.

The garden of this house extended as far as the Champs-Élysées.

Alexander used to arrive _incognito_ by a gate of the garden, and

politico-religious conversations would end with fervent prayers. Madame

de Krüdener invited me to one of these celestial incantations: I, the

man of every illusion, have a hatred of unreason, a loathing for the

nebulous and a scorn for hocus-pocus; we are none of us perfect. The

scene bored me; the more I tried to pray, the more I felt the dryness

of my soul. I could find nothing to say to God, and the devil incited

me to laugh. I had liked Madame de Krüdener better when, surrounded

with flowers and still inhabiting this paltry earth, she was writing

_Valérie._ Only, I used to consider that my old friend M. Michaud, so

oddly mixed up in this idyll, had not enough of the shepherd about

him, notwithstanding his name. Madame de Krüdener, become a seraph,

strove to surround herself with angels; the proof is contained in this

charming note from Benjamin Constant to Madame Récamier:

"_Thursday._

"I am a little embarrassed in fulfilling a commission which

Madame de Krüdener has just given me. She entreats you to

come looking as little beautiful as you can. She says that

you dazzle everybody and that, for that reason, all minds are

troubled and all attention becomes impossible. You cannot

lay aside your charmingness; but do not enhance it. I could

add many things about your beauty on this occasion, but I

have not the courage. One can be ingenious on the charm

which pleases, but not on that which kills. I shall see you

presently; you have told me five o'clock, but you will not

come in till six, and I shall not be able to say a word to

you. I shall try, however, to be amiable for this once again."

Did not the Duke of Wellington also lay claim to the honour of

attracting a glance from Juliet? One of his notes, which I transcribe,

is curious only because of the signature:

"PARIS, 13 _January._

"I confess, madame, that I do not much regret that business

will prevent me from calling on you after dinner, because,

every time I see you, I leave you more impressed with your

charms and less disposed to give my attention to _politics!!!_

"I will call on you to-morrow on my return from the Abbé

Sicard's, in case you should be in, and in spite of the

effect which those dangerous visits produce on me.

"Your most faithful servant,

"WELLINGTON."

On his return from Waterloo, entering Madame Récamier's drawing-room,

the Duke of Wellington exclaimed:

"I have beaten him soundly!"

In a French heart, his success would have made him lose the victory,

had he ever been able to lay claim to it.

[Sidenote: End of Madame de Staël.]

It was at a sad time for the glory of France that I met Madame Récamier

again; it was at the time of the death of Madame de Staël. Returning

to Paris after the Hundred Days, the author of Delphine had fallen ill

again; I had met her at her house and at Madame la Duchesse de Duras'.

Gradually, her condition growing worse, she was obliged to keep her

bed. One morning, I went to her in the Rue Royale; the shutters of her

windows were two-thirds closed; the bed, pushed towards the wall at the

back of the room, left only a space on the left; the curtains, drawn

back on metal rods, formed two columns at the head of the bed. Madame

de Staël, half sitting up, was propped up by pillows. I approached

and, when my eyes had grown a little accustomed to the darkness, I

distinguished the patient. A burning fever fired her cheeks. Her bright

glance met me in the dimness, and she said to me:

"Good morning, my dear Francis[473]. I suffer, but that does not

prevent me from loving you."

She held out her hand, which I pressed and kissed. As I raised my head,

I saw on the opposite side of the bed, against the wall, something

which rose up white and thin: it was M. de Rocca, with an emaciated

countenance, hollow cheeks, bloodshot eyes and a sallow complexion;

he was dying. I had never seen him, and I never saw him again. He did

not open his mouth; he bowed as he passed before me; the sound of his

footsteps was inaudible: he went away like a shadow. Stopping for a

moment at the door, "the vaporous idol twitching its fingers" turned

back towards the bed to wave adieu to Madame de Staël. Those two ghosts

looking at one another in silence, one erect and pale, the other seated

and coloured with a blood ready to flow down again and to congeal at

the heart, made one shudder.

A few days afterwards, Madame de Staël changed her lodging. She invited

me to dine with her, in the Rue Neuve-des-Mathurins: I went; she was

not in the drawing-room and was unable even to come in to dinner;

but she did not know that the fatal hour was so nigh. We sat down to

table. I found myself sitting by Madame Récamier. It was twelve years

since I had met her, and then I had seen her for but a moment. I did

not look at her, she did not look at me: we did not exchange a word.

When, towards the end of dinner, she timidly addressed a few words to

me on Madame de Staël's illness, I turned my head a little and raised

my eyes. I should fear to profane to-day through the mouth of my years

a sentiment which preserves all its youth in my memory and whose charm

increases as life withdraws. I separate my old days to discover behind

those days celestial apparitions, to hear from the bottom of the abyss

the harmonies of a happier region.

Madame de Staël died[474]. The last note which she wrote to Madame de

Duras was traced in big crazy letters, like a child's. It contained an

affectionate word for "Francis." The talent which expires impresses one

more painfully than the individual who dies: it is a general desolation

that strikes society; every one at the same moment suffers the same

loss.

With Madame de Staël disappeared a considerable portion of the time in

which I had lived: many of those breaches which the fall of a superior

intelligence forms in a century never close up again. Her death made on

me a particular impression, with which was mingled a sort of mysterious

astonishment: it was at that illustrious woman's that I had first met

Madame Récamier and, after long days of separation, Madame de Staël

brought together again two travelling persons who had become almost

strangers to one another: she left them, at a funeral banquet, her

memory and the example of her immortal attachment.

I went to see Madame Récamier in the Rue Basse-du-Rempart and,

afterwards, in the Rue d'Anjou. When one has rejoined his destiny, he

believes himself never to have left it: life, according to the opinion

of Pythagoras, is only a reminiscence. Who does not, in the course

of his days, recollect some little circumstances indifferent to all,

except to him who recalls them? Belonging to the house in the Rue

d'Anjou was a garden; in that garden, a bower of lime-trees, between

whose leaves I saw a moonbeam when I waited for Madame Récamier: does

it not seem to me as though that beam were mine and as though, if I

went to look for it in the same place, I should find it? I scarce

remember the sun which I have seen shine on many fore-heads.

[Sidenote: The Abbaye-aux-Bois.]

It was at that time that I was obliged to sell the Vallée-aux-Loups,

which Madame Récamier had hired, in half shares with M. de Montmorency.

More and more tried by fortune, Madame Récamier soon retired to the

Abbaye-aux-Bois[475]. The Duchesse d'Abrantès speaks as follows of that

abode:

"The Abbaye-aux-Bois, with all its dependencies, its

beautiful gardens, its extensive cloisters, in which played

young girls of all ages, with careless looks and frolicsome

words, was known only as a saintly abode to which a family

could safely entrust its hope; even then, it was known only

to the mothers who had an interest beyond its high walls.

But, once Sister Marie had closed the little gate surmounted

by an attic, the boundary of the saintly domain, one crossed

the great court-yard which separates the convent from the

street, not only as neutral, but as foreign ground.

"To-day this is no longer so: the name of the Abbaye-aux-Bois

has become popular; its renown is general and familiar to all

classes. The woman who goes there for the first time and says

to her footmen, 'To the Abbaye-aux-Bois' is sure not to be

asked by them in which direction they have to drive....

"Whence did it, in so short a time, derive so positive a

renown, so wide-spread an illustriousness? Do you see two

little windows, right up at the top, in the lofts, there,

above the large windows of the great stair-case? That is one

of the small rooms of the house. Well, nevertheless, the fame

of the Abbaye-aux-Bois took birth within its confines, came

down from there, and became popular. And how could it but

become popular, when all classes of society knew that, in

that little room, dwelt a being who led a life disinherited

of all joy and who, nevertheless, found words of consolation

for every sorrow, magic words to alleviate every pain,

succour for every misfortune?

"When, from the recesses of his prison, Coudert[476] caught a

glimpse of the scaffold, whose pity was it that he invoked?

'Go to Madame Récamier,' he said to his brother[477] 'tell

her that I am innocent before God... she will understand

that evidence...' and Coudert was saved. Madame Récamier

joined in her generous action a man gifted with both talent

and kindness: M. Ballanche seconded her endeavours, and the

scaffold devoured one victim the less.

"It might almost be described as a marvel offered to the

study of the human mind, that little cell in which a woman

of more than European reputation came to seek repose and a

decent asylum. The world is generally inclined to forget

those who no longer invite it to their banquets; it did not

forget her who, formerly, in the midst of her joys, lent an

even more willing ear to a complaint than to the accents of

pleasure. Not only was the little room on the third floor

of the Abbaye-aux-Bois the constant object of the errands

of Madame Récamier's friends, but, as though a fairy's

magic wand had relieved the steepness of the ascent, the

same strangers who used to ask as a favour to be admitted

to the elegant mansion on the Chaussée d'Antin continued

to beg the same boon. For them it was a sight really as

remarkable as any rarity in Paris to see, within a space of

ten feet by twenty, all opinions united under one banner,

marching in peace and almost hand in hand. The Vicomte de

Chateaubriand told Benjamin Constant of the unknown marvels

of America. Mathieu de Montmorency, with the urbanity

personal to himself, the chivalrous politeness of all that

bears his name, was as respectfully attentive to Madame

Bernadotte[478], who was about to reign in Sweden, as he

would have been to the sister[479] of Adelaide of Savoy[480],

daughter of Humbert the White-handed[481], that widow of

Louis the Fat[482] who married one of his ancestors[483]. And

the man of the feudal times had not a single bitter word for

the man of our days of liberty.

[Sidenote: Society at the Abbaye.]

"Seated side by side on the same divan, the duchess of the

Faubourg Saint-Germain became polite to the duchess of the

Empire; nothing seemed to shock in that unique room. When I

saw Madame Récamier again in that room, I had just returned

to Paris, after a long absence. I had a service to ask of

her, and went to her with confidence. I well knew, through

common friends, to how great a measure of strength her

courage had risen, but I myself lacked it when I saw her

there, under the loft, as peaceful and calm as in the gilded

drawing-rooms of the Rue du Mont-Blanc.

"'What!' said I to myself. 'Nothing but sufferings!'

"And my moist eye fixed itself upon her with an expression

which she must have understood. Alas, my memories passed

back over the years and recaptured the past! Ever beaten by

the storm, that woman, whom fame had placed at the very top

of the wreath of flowers of the age, had, for the last ten

years, seen her life surrounded by sorrows, the shock of

which was striking repeated blows at her heart and killing

her!...

"When, guided by old memories and a constant attraction, I

selected the Abbaye-aux-Bois as my refuge, the little room

on the third storey was no longer inhabited by her whom I

should have gone to seek there; Madame Récamier at that time

occupied a more spacious apartment. It was there that I saw

her again. Death had thinned the ranks of the combatants

around her, and, of all those political champions, M. de

Chateaubriand was almost the only one among her friends

who had survived. But for him too the hour struck of hope

deceived and royal ingratitude. He was wise; he bade farewell

to those false pretenses of happiness, and relinquished the

uncertain power of the tribune to grasp one more practical.

"You have already seen that, in this drawing-room at the

Abbaye-aux-Bois, there was question of other interests

besides literary interests, and that those who suffer may

turn towards it a look full of hope, Constantly occupied as

I have, for some months, been with all that relates to the

family of the Emperor, I have found a few documents which do

not seem to be devoid of interest at this moment.

"The Queen of Spain[484] found herself under an absolute

necessity to return to France. She wrote to Madame Récamier

to beg her to interest herself in the request which she was

making to be allowed to come to Paris. M. de Chateaubriand

was at that time in office, and the Queen of Spain, knowing

the loyalty of his character, had every confidence in

the success of her appeal. Nevertheless, the thing was

difficult, because there was a law which affected all that

unhappy family, even in its most virtuous members. But M. de

Chateaubriand had in him that feeling of a noble pity for

misfortune, which later made him write those touching words:

Sur le compte des grands je ne suis pas suspect:

Leurs malheurs seulement attirent mon respect.

Je hais ce Pharaon, que l'éclat environne;

Mais s'il tombe, à l'instant j'honore sa couronne;

Il devient, à mes yeux, roi par l'adversité;

Des pleurs je reconnais l'auguste autorité:

Courtisan du malheur, etc., etc.[485]

"M. de Chateaubriand lent an ear to the interests of a person

in distress; he examined his duty, which did not lay upon him

the fear of dreading a weak woman, and, two days after the

request was made, he wrote to Madame Récamier that Madame

Joseph Bonaparte might return to France, asking where she

was, in order that he might send her, through M. Durand de

Moreuil, then our Minister to Brussels[486], permission to

come to France under the name of the Comtesse de Villeneuve.

He wrote at the same time to M. de Fagel[487].

"I have related this fact with so much the more pleasure as

it honours both her who asked and the minister who obliged

her: the one through her noble confidence, the other through

his noble humanity[488]."

Madame d'Abrantès praises my conduct far too highly: it was not worth

even the trouble of remark; but, as she does not tell all there is to

tell about the Abbaye-aux-Bois, I will supply what she has forgotten or

omitted.

[Sidenote: Captain Roger.]

Captain Roger[489], another Coudert, had been condemned to death.

Madame Récamier had joined me in her pious work of saving him. Benjamin

Constant had also interceded on behalf of this companion of Caron's,

and had given the condemned man's brother the following letter for

Madame Récamier:

"I could not forgive myself, madame, for always importuning

you, but it is not my fault if there are incessant

condemnations to death. This letter will be delivered to

you by the brother of the unhappy Roger, sentenced with

Caron[490]. The story is very hateful and very well-known.

The name alone will acquaint M. de Chateaubriand with the

matter. He is fortunate enough to be at the same time the

first talent in the Ministry and the only minister under whom

no blood has been spilt. I say no more; I leave the rest to

your heart. It is very sad to have to write to you almost

exclusively on distressful matters; but you forgive me, I

know, and I am sure that you will add one more unfortunate to

the long list of those whom you have saved.

"A thousand fond respects.

"B. CONSTANT.

"PARIS, 1 _March_ 1823."

When Captain Roger was set at liberty, he hastened to express his

gratitude to his benefactress. One evening, after dinner, I was at

Madame Récamier's as usual; suddenly appeared this officer. He said to

us, in a southern accent:

"But for your intercession, my head would have rolled on the scaffold."

We were stupefied, for we had forgotten our merits; he shouted, red as

a turkey-cock:

"You don't remember?... You don't remember?..." In vain we made

a thousand excuses for our lack of memory; he went off, striking

the spurs of his boots together again and again, as furious at our

forgetting our good action as though he had had to reproach us with his

death.

About this time, Talma asked Madame Récamier to allow him to meet

me at her rooms in order to consult me on some verses in Ducis'

_Othello_, which he was not allowed to speak as they stood. Leaving my

dispatches, I hastened to keep the appointment; I spent the evening

with the modern Roscius recasting the unlucky lines. He proposed an

alteration to me, I proposed another to him; we vied with each other

in rhyming; we withdrew to the window-recess or to a corner to turn

and re-turn a hemistich. We had much difficulty in agreeing as to the

sense and the rhythm. It would have been rather curious to see me, the

minister of Louis XVIII., and Talma, the king of the stage, forgetting

what we might be, emulating each other in enthusiasm, and sending the

censorship and all the grandeurs of the world to the deuce. But, if

Richelieu had his dramas performed while letting Gustavus Adolphus[491]

loose on Europe, could not I, a humble secretary of State, busy myself

with the tragedies of others while seeking the independence of France

in Madrid?

[Sidenote: Sweet hours at the Abbaye.]

Madame la Duchesse d'Abrantès, whose coffin I have saluted in the

church at Chaillot, has described only the _inhabited_ abode of Madame

Récamier; I will tell of the _solitary_ refuge. A dark corridor

separated two small rooms. I maintained that this vestibule was lit

up with a gentle light. The bed-room was furnished with a library,

a harp, a piano, a portrait of Madame de Staël and a view of Coppet

by moonlight; pots of flowers adorned the window-sills. When, quite

breathless with clambering up three flights of stairs, I entered the

cell at the fall of evening, I was enraptured. The outlook from the

windows was over the garden of the Abbaye, in the green clumps of which

the nuns moved to and fro and school-girls ran hither and thither.

The top of an acacia-tree rose to the level of the eye. Sharp-pointed

steeples pierced the sky, and on the horizon appeared the hills of

Sèvres. The expiring sun gilded the picture and entered through the

open windows. Madame Récamier sat at her piano; the Angelus tolled:

the sound of the bell which seemed "to weep the dying day, _pianger

il giorno che si muore_[492]," mingled with the last accents of the

Invocation of the Night in Steibelt's[493] _Romeo and Juliet._ A few

birds came to nestle in the raised outer blinds; I joined the silence

and solitude from afar, above the noise and tumult of a great city.

God, by giving me those hours of peace, indemnified me for my hours of

trouble; I foresaw the coming rest which my faith believes in and my

hope invokes. Agitated as I was elsewhere with political occupations,

or disgusted with the ingratitude of Courts, peacefulness of heart

awaited me in the recesses of that retreat, like the coolness of the

woods when one leaves a scorching plain. I recovered my calm beside a

woman who spread serenity around her; and yet that serenity was not

in any way too even, for it passed through deep affections. Alas, the

men whom I used to meet at Madame Récamier's, Mathieu de Montmorency,

Camille Jordan, Benjamin Constant, the Duc de Laval, have gone to

join Hingant, Joubert, Fontanes, others who were absent from another

absent company. Amid those successive friendships have risen young

friends, the vernal offshoots of an old forest in which the felling

is everlasting. I beg them, I beg M. Ampère, who will read this when

I am gone, I ask them all to keep me in their memory: I make over to

them the thread of the life the end of which Lachesis is spinning out

on my distaff. My inseparable road-fellow, M. Ballanche, has found

himself alone at the commencement and at the end of my career; he has

witnessed my friendships broken by time as I have witnessed his carried

away by the Rhone: rivers always undermine their banks.

The misfortune of my friends has often weighed heavily on me, and I

have never shrunk from the sacred burden: the moment of reward has

arrived; a serious attachment deigns to help me to support that which

the multitude of the bad days adds to their weight. As I draw near my

end, it seems to me that all that has been dear to me has been dear

to me in Madame Récamier, and that she was the hidden source of my

affections. My memories of diverse ages, those of my dreams as well as

those of my realities, have become moulded, blended, confounded into

a compound of charms and sweet sufferings of which she has become the

visible embodiment She regulates my sentiments, in the same way as

Heaven has set happiness, order and peace into my duties.

I have followed the fair wanderer along the path which she has trodden

so lightly; soon I shall go before her to a new country. As she passes

in the midst of these Memoirs, in the windings of the basilica which I

hasten to complete, she may come upon the chapel which here I dedicate

to her; it will perhaps please her to rest in it: I have placed her

image there.

[Footnote 336: This book was written in Paris in 1839.--T.]

[Footnote 337: MADAME DE STAËL, _Corinne, ou l'Italie_ (Paris,

1807).--T.]

[Footnote 338: Florio's MONTAIGNE, Booke I., chap. III.: _Our

affections are transported beyond our selves._--T.]

[Footnote 339: Madame Récamier, before her marriage, was Jeanne

Françoise Julie Adélaïde Bernard. Of all her baptismal names, only

Julie remained, transformed into Juliette. Her father, Jean Bernard,

was a notary at Lyons; in 1784, he was appointed a receiver of finance

in Paris.--B.]

[Footnote 340: And not thirteen, as the earlier editions have it.--B.]

[Footnote 341: Jacques Rose Récamier (1751-1830), the Paris banker. The

marriage took place on the 24th of April 1793.--T.]

[Footnote 342: Benjamin Constant, _Adolphe: anecdote trouvée dans les

papiers d'un inconnu_ (Paris, 1816).--T.]

[Footnote 343: At the corner of the Boulevard de la Madeleine and the

Rue Louis-le-Grand: the last remnant of the Hôtel de Richelieu, which

was almost wholly destroyed during the Revolution. The Pavillon de

Hanovre served as a public ball-room.--T.]

[Footnote 344: ANDRÉ CHÉNIER, _La Jeune captive_ (Paris, 1795):

"I do not wish to die so soon."--T.

]

[Footnote 345: This letter is dated, "From my retreat at Corbeil,

Saturday, 28 September 1797." La Harpe was proscribed after the 18

Fructidor, and found a shelter at Corbeil, where Madame Récamier paid

him one visit.--B.]

[Footnote 346: This letter has no further date, but must have been

written a few days after the 18 Brumaire.--B.]

[Footnote 347: LUCIEN BONAPARTE, _La Tribu indienne, ou Édouard et

Stellina_ (Paris, 1799).]

[Footnote 348: Like the Duc de Laval, another admirer of Madame

Récamier, Benjamin Constant disliked dates. His work on Madame

Récamier does not contain one. At the end of 1798, Madame de Staël was

charged by her father to sell the house which he owned in the Rue du

Mont-Blanc, now No. 7, Rue de la Chaussée-d'Antin. M. Récamier had long

had business-relations with M. Necker, whose banker he was, as well

as his daughter's; he bought the house. The deed of sale is dated 25

Vendémiaire Year VII. (16 October 1798).--B.]

[Footnote 349: Later the Duc de Laval-Montmorency, whom Chateaubriand

was to replace in Rome.--B.]

[Footnote 350: Madame de Staël's novel of _Delphine_, which appeared in

the autumn of 1802.--B.]

[Footnote 351: "By the voice of the old thou didst praise beauty's

charms."--T.]

[Footnote 352: Peace was concluded at Amiens between Great Britain and

Ireland on the one side, and France, Spain, and the Batavian Republic

on the 27th of March 1802, and lasted till the 18th of May 1803, when

Great Britain resumed hostilities.--T.]

[Footnote 353: Georgiana Duchess of Devonshire (1757-1806), _née_

Spencer, wife of the fifth Duke of Devonshire, and famous for her wit,

beauty and social and political influence.--T.]

[Footnote 354: Elizabeth Viscountess Melbourne (1753-1818), _née_

Milbanke, married in 1769 to Peniston Lamb, first Viscount Melbourne.

The rise of her family was due to her brilliant qualities.--T.]

[Footnote 355: Emily Mary Marchioness of Salisbury (1751-1835),

daughter of Wills Hill, first Marquess of Downshire, and married to

James Cecil, seventh Earl, later first Marquess of Salisbury, in 1773.

Lady Salisbury perished in the fire that burnt down the west wing of

Hatfield House in November 1835.--T.]

[Footnote 356: Antoine Philippe Duc de Montpensier (1775-1807) died in

England of a malady of the chest.--T.]

[Footnote 357: Louis Comte de Beaujolais (1779-1808) died in Malta.--T.]

[Footnote 358: George IV. was appointed Regent of the United Kingdom

in 1811, and came to the throne on the 29th of January 1820;

Louis-Philippe usurped the throne of France on the 9th of August

1830.--T.]

[Footnote 359: Alexander Douglas-Hamilton, Marquess of Douglas, later

(1819) tenth Duke of Hamilton and seventh of Brandon (_d._ 1852), had

been Ambassador to St. Petersburg and was, at this time (1802), M.P.

for Lanarkshire.--T.]

[Footnote 360: Charles X. came to Holyrood in 1830. The Dukes of

Hamilton are Hereditary Keepers of Holyrood Palace.--T.]

[Footnote 361: Charlotte Duchess of Somerset, _née_ Douglas-Hamilton,

married, in 1800, to the eleventh Duke of Somerset.--T.]

[Footnote 362: Francesco Bartolozzi (1727-1813), the famous Italian

engraver, lived in London from 1764 to 1802, when he removed to Lisbon

to take charge of the National Academy in that capital.--T.]

[Footnote 363: William I. was proclaimed first King of the Netherlands

on the 16th of March 1815. He abdicated on the 7th of October 1840,

one year after the above lines were written and three years before his

death.--T.]

[Footnote 364: Bernadotte became King of Sweden, as Charles XIV., in

1818.--T.]

[Footnote 365: September 1803.--B.]

[Footnote 366: Andoche Junot, Maréchal Duc d'Abrantès (1771-1813).--T.]

[Footnote 367: MADAME DE STAËL, _Dix années d'exil_, Part I., chap.

XI.--B.]

[Footnote 368: Elzéar Louis Marie Comte de Sabran (1774-1846), a firm

friend of Madame de Staël's, and his mother, who married the Chevalier

de Boufflers as her second husband.--T.]

[Footnote 369: Louis Prince, later Louis I. King of Bavaria (1786-1868)

succeeded his father, Maximilian I., in 1825, and abdicated in

1848.--T.]

[Footnote 370: Prince Charles Frederic Augustus of Mecklenburg-Strelitz

(1785-1837).--T.]

[Footnote 371: Eugène de Beauharnais, later Duc de Leuchtenberg and

Prince d'Eichstädt (1781-1824), son of Joséphine, by her first husband,

and appointed Viceroy of Italy in 1805.--T.]

[Footnote 372: Madame Moreau, _née_ Hulot, was a Creole and a friend of

Joséphine de Beauharnais. After the death of Moreau, Alexander I. gave

her a donation of 500,000 roubles and a pension of 30,000 roubles per

annum.--T.]

[Footnote 373: Anthelme Brillat-Savarin (1755-1826), author of the

_Physiologie du goût_, had been appointed a judge of the Court of

Appeal by the Consulate in 1800.--B.]

[Footnote 374: Pichegru committed suicide, or was assassinated, in

prison, on the 5th of April 1804.--T.]

[Footnote 375: The execution of Georges Cadoudal and his eleven

companions took place on the 25th of July 1804, at eleven o'clock in

the morning, on the Place de Grève. The evening before, the gaol-keeper

at Bicêtre had entered Cadoudal's cell and brought him a petition for

mercy ready for signature. Georges cast a glance at the paper, and saw

that it was addressed "To His Majesty the Emperor." He refused to see

any more. Turning to his companions:

"Comrades," he said, "let us say our prayers."

On the morning of the execution, Captain Laborde said to someone who

asked him for news of the criminal:

"He has slept more peacefully than I."

On arriving at the Place de Grève, the Abbé de Keravenant made him say

the Angelic Salutation: "Hail Mary, full of grace... Holy Mary, Mother

of God, pray for us sinners now..."

Here Georges stopped.

"Continue," said the priest,"... and at the hour of our death."

"To what purpose?" asked Georges. "Is not now the hour of our death?"

Cadoudal insisted upon dying first, lest his comrades should imagine

that he could survive them.--B.]

[Footnote 376: The Monk of Saint-Gall (_circa_ 884) is the anonymous

author of the half-genuine, half-fabulous _Gestes de Charlemagne._--T.]

[Footnote 377: M. Necker died at Coppet on the 9th of April 1804.--B.]

[Footnote 378: M. Récamier's ruin happened two years after the death

of M. Necker, in the autumn of 1806. It was produced chiefly through

the political and financial condition of Spain, by which M. Récamier's

banking-house was seriously embarrassed. He asked the Bank of France

for a loan of a million francs, which would have saved him; the loan

was refused, and the crash came. Madame Récamier sold her jewellery to

the last piece; the plate was sold; the house in the Rue du Mont-Blanc

was bought by M. Mosselmann. So great was the confidence and esteem

of the creditors for M. Récamier that they entrusted him with the

liquidation of his own estate.--B.]

[Footnote 379: 17 November 1806.--B.]

[Footnote 380: Madame Récamier lost her mother on the 20th January

of 1807. Her first six months of mourning were spent in profound

seclusion; in the middle of the summer of 1807, she consented, at

Madame de Staël's entreaties, to go to Coppet.--B.]

[Footnote 381: Prince Augustus was taken prisoner, not at Eylau, but

at the Battle of Saalfeld (10 October 1806). The young Prince was

only twenty-four years of age; he was five years younger than Madame

Récamier.--B.]

[Footnote 382: MADAME DE GENLIS**, _Mademoiselle de Clermont_ (Paris,

1802).--T.]

[Footnote 383: _Athénaïs, ou le Château de Coppet en 1807_ was

published in 1832, two years after the Comtesse de Genlis' death. It

was written when she was over eighty years of age.--T.]

[Footnote 384: In the autumn of 1807.--B.]

[Footnote 385: And not 1812, as the previous editions have it.--B.]

[Footnote 386: Now the property of the Prince Amédée de Broglie.--B.]

[Footnote 387: Chateaubriand does not give the date of this letter,

which must have been written in September 1810. Madame de Staël tells,

in her _Dix années d'exil_ (Part II., chap, i.), how she corrected the

last proof of l'_Allemagne_ on the 23rd of September 1810, and how she

made a list of one hundred persons to whom she wished to send copies in

different parts of France and Europe.--B.]

[Footnote 388: October 1810. The three volumes of l'_Allemagne_ were

hardly printed, when the Duc de Rovigo, the Minister of Police, sent

his agents to destroy the ten thousand copies that had been struck off,

and served an order on the author to leave France within three days.

Having read in the newspapers that some American ships had arrived in

the Channel ports, Madame de Staël decided to make use of a passport

which she had for America, hoping that it would be possible for her to

land in England. She required a few days, in any case, to prepare for

the voyage, and she was obliged to apply to the Minister of Police for

those few days. In a letter dated 3 October 1810, Rovigo allowed her

eight days and said:

"It appears to me that the air of this country does not suit

you, and we are not yet reduced to looking for models in the

peoples which you admire. Your last work is un-French; I

myself stopped the printing.... I am instructing M. Corbigny

[the Prefect of Loir-et-Cher] to attend to the execution of

the order which I have given him, when the delay which I am

granting you has expired."

The letter of the Minister of Police ends with this postscript:

"I have my reasons, madame, for mentioning to you the ports

of Lorient, the Rochelle, Bordeaux and Rochefort as the only

ports at which you can embark. I request you to let me know

which you select."

The Channel ports were forbidden to Madame de Staël, in order to

prevent her from going to England. So soon as Coppet became the sole

alternative to America, she determined to go back to Coppet, where she

arrived in the latter half of October 1810.--B.]

[Footnote 389: The order of banishment was issued against Madame

Récamier and M. Mathieu de Montmorency in September 1811.--B.]

[Footnote 390: On arriving at Châlons, she first put up at the inn of

the Pomme d'Or, which she soon left to take a small apartment in the

Rue du Cloître.--B.]

[Footnote 391: The Château de Montmirail, the magnificent habitation of

the La Rochefoucauld-Doudeauvilles, in the Department of the Marne.--B.]

[Footnote 392: M. de Rocca (1784-1818), a young officer eighteen years

Madame de Staël's junior. He survived her one year only.--T.]

[Footnote 393: Auguste Louis de Staël Holstein ( 1790-1827), Madame de

Staël's eldest son.--B.]

[Footnote 394: This note, of which Chateaubriand does not give the

date, was written when Madame de Staël was on the point of setting

out from Switzerland for Germany. She left Coppet on the 23rd of May

1812.--B.]

[Footnote 395: Madame de Staël's youngest son was killed in a duel, in

1813.--B.]

[Footnote 396: Madame Récamier left Châlons in June 1812, to go

to Lyons to stay with Madame Delphin-Récamier, a sister of her

husband's.--B.]

[Footnote 397: The Duchesse de Chevreuse, _née_ Norbonne-Pelet, married

to the Duc de Chevreuse, son to the Duc de Luynes. Her father-in-law

was compelled to accept a senatorship, in 1803, and she obliged, in

1806, to consent to become one of the Empress Joséphine's ladies. Two

years later, when the Spanish Royal Family were arrested, the Emperor

wished to place the Duchesse de Chevreuse with the captive Queen; the

duchess replied that she could be a prisoner, but would never be a

gaoler. This proud answer procured her exile, which eventually resulted

in her death.--B.]

[Footnote 398: In the spring of 1813.--B.]

[Footnote 399: Amélie Lenormant, adopted daughter of Madame Récamier,

and married to M. Charles Lenormant.--T.]

[Footnote 400: Jacques Marquet de Montbreton, Baron de Norvins

(1769-1854), author of a now forgotten History of Napoleon (1827).--B.]

[Footnote 401: Benvenuto Cellini (1500-1571), the famous Italian

sculptor and artificer in gold and silver. _Cf._ his Autobiography,

one of the most famous of Italian classics, circulated in MS. until it

was first printed in 1730, translated into German by Goethe and into

English by, _inter alios_, the late John Addington Symonds.--T.]

[Footnote 402: Francesco Petrarca (1304-1374), one of the chief names

in Tuscan literature.--T.]

[Footnote 403: The Albano fisherman was shot in September 1813; one

month later, in October of the same year, Napoleon lost his Empire on

the plains of Leipzig.--B.]

[Footnote 404: Madame de Beaumont.--_Author's Note._]

[Footnote 405: Madame Récamier went to Naples at the beginning of

December 1813.--B.]

[Footnote 406: Murat, the son of an inn-keeper, had commenced life as a

postilion.--T.]

[Footnote 407: The Gauls planted a bare sword to mark the centre of the

_Mallus_, or council. The _mallus_ survives in our modern word mall, a

space bordered with trees.--B.]

[Footnote 408: Caroline Murat, Queen of Naples (1782-1839), sister of

Napoleon Bonaparte, and married to Joachim Murat in 1800.--T.]

[Footnote 409: Publius Virgilius Maro (B.C. 70--B.C. 19), died at

Brundisium in Calabria, and was buried at Parthenope (Naples). Virgil's

tomb bears an inscription composed by himself in his last moments:--

_Mantua me genuit; Calabri rapuere; tenet nunc_

_Parthenope: cecini pascua, rura, duces_.--T.

]

[Footnote 410: Torquato Tasso (1544-1595) was born at Sorrento.--T.]

[Footnote 411: Quintus Horatius Flaccus (B.C. 65-B.C. 8).--T.]

[Footnote 412: Titus Livius (B.C. 50--A.D. 17).--T.]

[Footnote 413: Giovanni Boccaccio (1313-1375), the author of the

Decameron, lived at Naples from about 1330 to about 1341.--T.]

[Footnote 414: Jacopo Sannazaro (1458-1530), the Italian and Latin

poet, was born and died at Naples.--T.]

[Footnote 415: Francesco Durante (1684-1755), the religious composer,

born at Naples 15 March 1684, director of the Conservatory of Santa

Maria di Loreto at Naples.--T.]

[Footnote 416: Domenico Cimarosa (1749-1801), composer of _Il

Matrimonio segreto_, born at Aversa, near Naples, 17 December 1749.--T.]

[Footnote 417: Admiral Horatio Nelson, first Viscount Nelson

(1758-1805), retired to Naples after the Battle of the Nile, in

1798, and remained there till 1800, when, on the expiration of Sir

William Hamilton's embassy, he returned to England and received his

peerage.--T.]

[Footnote 418: Emma Lady Hamilton (_circa_ 1761-1815), _née_ Hart,

originally a servant-girl of great personal beauty and loose character,

became mistress of, among many others, Charles Greville and Sir

William Hamilton, whom she married on the death of his first wife and

joined at Naples, where he was Envoy from 176410 1800, and finally of

Nelson. Lady Hamilton played a great part at the Court of Naples as the

intimate friend of Queen Maria Carolina. She died in distress.--T.]

[Footnote 419: The Posilipo contains the famous grotto, at the entrance

of which Virgil's tomb stands, and is pierced by a subterranean road to

Pozzuoli.--T.]

[Footnote 420: The correct date of Chateaubriand's excursion to

Liternum is January 1804.--B.]

[Footnote 421: Scipio Africanus died and was buried at Liternum, now

Torre di Patria, fourteen miles from Naples.--T.]

[Footnote 422: Robert Guiscard, Duke of Apulia and Calabria (_circa_

1015-1085), son of Tancred de Hauteville, succeeded his brother

Humphrey as Count of Apulia in 1057, and became Duke of Apulia in

1059.--T.]

[Footnote 423: William I., first Norman Count of Apulia (_d._ 1046),

surnamed Iron-arm, eldest son of Tancred de Hauteville.--T.]

[Footnote 424: Roger II. Count of Sicily, later Roger I. first King of

the Two Sicilies (1093-1154), son of Roger I. Count of Sicily, twelfth

son of Tancred de Hauteville. Roger became Duke of Apulia on the death

of his cousin, William II. in 1127, and assumed the title of King of

the Two Sicilies in 1130.--T.]

[Footnote 425: Tancred Prince of Galilee, later of Edessa (_d._ 1112),

nephew of Robert Guiscard, and one of the most brilliant heroes of the

first Crusade and of Tasso's _Gerusalemme Liberata._--T.]

[Footnote 426: Salerno.--T.]

[Footnote 427: Capri.--T.]

[Footnote 428: Ischia.--T.]

[Footnote 429: Procida.---T.]

[Footnote 430: Miseno.--T.]

[Footnote 431: Baja.--T.]

[Footnote 432: Naples.--T.]

[Footnote 433: CHATEAUBRIAND, _Les Martyrs_: Book V., the story of

Eudorus.]

[Footnote 434: General Adam Adalbert Count von Neipperg (1775-1829) was

sent by Francis II., in July 1814, to escort Marie-Louise. He won the

Empress' favours, accompanied her, in 1816, to Parma, where she made

him Master of her Household and married him morganatically, in 1822,

after the death of Napoleon. Their eldest son, the present Prince von

Montenuovo (Neipperg = Neuberg = Montenuovo), was born on the 9th of

August 1821.--T.]

[Footnote 435: Louis François Auguste Prince de Léon, Cardinal Duc de

Rohan-Chabot (1788-1833), Archbishop of Besançon, was brought up in

England, where his family were living in emigration. He returned to

France, in 1809, with his wife, _née_ de Sérent, and became a Court

chamberlain under Napoleon, and an officer in the Red Musketeers

under Louis XVIII. The Duchesse de Rohan-Chabot was burnt to death

in 1815, and her husband renounced the world, took orders and became

successively Grand-vicar of Paris, Archbishop of Auch, Archbishop of

Besançon (1829) and a cardinal (1830). He left France at the Revolution

of July, but returned to his diocese in 1832, on the outbreak of the

cholera, caught the infection, and died of it.--T.]

[Footnote 436: Madame Lenormant drew the following portrait of M. de

Rohan-Chabot in 1813:

"He was in all the flower of his youth and had, in spite

of a shade of somewhat pronounced fatuousness, the most

charming, the most delicate, I would almost say the most

virginal face imaginable. M. de Chabot's appearance was one

of perfect elegance: his beautiful hair was curled with great

art and taste; he made an extreme study of his dress; he

was pale; his voice was very sweet. His manners were most

distinguished, but haughty. He was not clever, but, although

generally ill-informed, he had the gift of languages; he

grasped quickly and almost musically not the genius of a

language, but its accent."--B. ]

[Footnote 437: Madame Récamier was a native of Lyons on the Rhone.--T.]

[Footnote 438: After the death of the "People's Friend," Murat, by

simply changing one letter, transformed his name into that of Marat.

So proud was he of his invention that, in a letter which he wrote on

the 18th of November 1793, urging the execution of a "Moderantist," he

appended his new signature, "MARAT," no less than four times (MASSON,

_Napoléon et sa famille_, Vol. I. p. 311).--B.]

[Footnote 439: 1797.--T.]

[Footnote 440: 25 July 1799.--T.]

[Footnote 441: 10 November 1799.--T.]

[Footnote 442: 20 January 1800.--B.]

[Footnote 443: 14 June 1800.--T.]

[Footnote 444: 1804.--T.]

[Footnote 445: 13 November 1805.--B.]

[Footnote 446: 2 December 1805.--T.]

[Footnote 447: 14 October 1806.--T.]

[Footnote 448: 8 February 1807.--T.]

[Footnote 449: 14 June 1807.--T.]

[Footnote 450: 15 March 1806.--B.]

[Footnote 451: August 1812.--T.]

[Footnote 452: 16-19 October 1813.--T.]

[Footnote 453: Jean Michel Laurent Agar Comte de Mosbourg (1771-1844),

a schoolfellow of Murat, who made him Minister of Finance in his

Principality of Berg, married him to one of his nieces and gave him the

title and endowment of the County of Mosbourg. In 1808, he accompanied

the new King to Naples, where, as at Düsseldorf, he became Minister of

Finance, a post which he retained through almost the whole reign. He

entered the French Chamber of Deputies in 1830 and was raised to the

peerage in 1837.--T.]

[Footnote 454: 29 January 1814.--B.]

[Footnote 455: Arrhidæus (_d._ 317 B.C.), an illegitimate son of

Philip King of Macedon, and half-brother to Alexander. He was made

King of Macedon till Roxana, who was pregnant by Alexander, brought

into the world a legitimate male successor. Arrhidæus was seven

years in possession of the sovereign power, and was put to death by

Olympias.--T.]

[Footnote 456: 28 March 1815.--T.]

[Footnote 457: Lieutenant Field-marshal Johann Maria Baron, later Count

von Frimont, Prince of Antrodocco (1759-1831), a native of Belgium, had

served in the French army, emigrated in 1791, and entered the Austrian

service. Ferdinand I. created Frimont Prince of Antrodocco, and granted

him a donation of 220,000 ducats. In 1825, the Emperor of Austria

created him a count and made him Governor of Lombardy and, in 1831, the

year of his death, Frimont became President of the Austrian Council of

War.--T.]

[Footnote 458: 3 May 1815.--B.]

[Footnote 459: 19 May 1815.--B.]

[Footnote 460: Ferdinand I. King of the Two Sicilies and IV. of Naples

(1751-1825) reigned in Naples from 1759 to 1806 and from 1815 to 1825,

and in Sicily from 1759 to 1825.--T.]

[Footnote 461: Collonna-Ceccaldi was Mayor of Vescovato and

father-in-law to General Franceschetti.--T.]

[Footnote 462: General Dominique César Franceschetti (1776-1835)

was severely wounded, when fighting by Murat's side in the Pizzo

Expedition, and taken prisoner. He was afterwards amnestied by King

Ferdinand I.--T.]

[Footnote 463: Colonel Francis Maceroni, or de Macirone (1787-1846),

was born near Manchester, of a family of Roman origin, and was sent

to Naples to complete his education. Here he was kept a prisoner of

war, as a British subject, from 1806 till the advent of Murat in 1808.

The new King took him into favour, made him his aide-de-camp and

employed him in his negociations with England. After Murat's departure

from Corsica, Maceroni returned to France, where he was arrested

and not released before the British Ambassador had made repeated

representations on his behalf. He fought as a soldier of fortune in the

South American Wars of Independence (1817) and in Spain (1823). His

later years were spent in invention, notably of the famous Maceroni

steam-carriage.--T.]

[Footnote 464: Napoleon set foot on St. Helena on the 15th of October

1815.--B.]

[Footnote 465: The portraits consisted of an engraved cornelian seal

with his wife's likeness and a miniature of the features of his four

children.--T.]

[Footnote 466: Pius VII. made his solemn entry into Rome on the 25th of

May 1814.--B.]

[Footnote 467: This description occurs in that portion of the Memoirs,

devoted to the life of Napoleon, which has been omitted.--T.]

[Footnote 468: Alexis Louis Joseph Comte de Noailles (1783-1835)

had been imprisoned, in 1809, for spreading Pius VII.'s Bull of

Excommunication against the authors and accomplices of the usurpation

of the Papal States. In May 1814, the Comte de Noailles was Royal

Commissary in Lyons.--B.]

[Footnote 469: Madame Charles Lenormant (_vide supra_ p. 180, n.

2).--T.]

[Footnote 470: She arrived in Paris on the 1st of June 1814.--B.]

[Footnote 471: _L'Esprit de conquête et d'usurpation dans ses rapports

avec la civilisation européenne_ was published, early in 1814, in

Germany, where Benjamin Constant then was; he returned to France with

the Bourbons.--B.]

[Footnote 472: The appointment is announced in the _Journal de

l'Empire_ of the 6th of April 1815.--B.]

[Footnote 473: In English in the original.--T.]

[Footnote 474: 14 July 1817.--T.]

[Footnote 475: In 1819, Madame Récamier retired to the Abbaye-aux-Bois,

where she occupied a small and incommodious apartment on the third

storey, with a stone flooring and a stair-case of the most awkward

description, which did not prevent its being climbed daily by the

greatest ladies of the Faubourg Saint-Germain and by all the leading

lights of Paris.--B.]

[Footnote 476: He was implicated in the Bories Affair.--_Author's Note._

Charles Coudert, a quarter-master of cavalry, was not implicated in

the Bories Affair, but in a military conspiracy against the Government

which broke out, in December 1821, at Saumur. Of the eleven accused,

eight were acquitted, and Coudert and two others condemned to death, in

February 1822. Madame Récamier employed her credit on his behalf and,

on the 18th of April, Coudert's sentence was commuted to one of five

years' imprisonment.--B.]

[Footnote 477: Eugène Coudert, Charles Coudert's elder brother.--B.]

[Footnote 478: Eugénie Bernardine Désirée Clary, later Désirée Queen

of Sweden (1781-1860), _née_ Clary, married Bernadotte in 1798, after

having been engaged to Napoleon Bonaparte.--T.]

[Footnote 479: Agnès Dame de Bourbon, second daughter of Humbert II.

Count of Savoy, and married to Archambad VII. Sire de Bourbon, who died

in 1171.--T.]

[Footnote 480: Adelaide of Savoy, Queen of France (_d._ 1154), daughter

of Humbert II., not of Humbert the White-handed, married, in 1114, to

Louis the Fat, King of France, and, four years after his death, which

occurred in 1137, to the Constable de Montmorency.--T.]

[Footnote 481: Humbert I., first Count of Savoy (_circa_ 985--_circa_

1048), surnamed the White-handed.--T.]

[Footnote 482: Louis VI. King of France (1078-1137), surnamed the

Fat.--T.]

[Footnote 483: Mathieu I. Seigneur de Montmorency (_d._ 1160),

appointed Constable of France in 1130. He married, first, Aline,

illegitimate daughter of Henry I. King of England, and, secondly, Queen

Adelaide of France.--T.]

[Footnote 484: Julia Queen of Naples, later of Spain (1777-1845), was

Marie Julie Clary, sister to Madame Bernadette, and was married to

Joseph Bonaparte in 1794.--T.]

[Footnote 485: CHATEAUBRIAND, _Moïse_, Act III. sc. IV.-B.

"Where the great are concerned, I am nowise suspect:

Their misfortunes alone win from me my respect.

I hate this King Pharaoh, while glory's his own;

Let him fall: on the instant I honour his crown:

By reason of grief he is king in my eyes;

I bow down before tears as great magistracies;

Misfortune's sad courtier, etc."--T.

]

[Footnote 486: The ex-Queen of Spain was then living in Brussels under

the name of Comtesse de Survilliers.--T.]

[Footnote 487: Lieutenant-General Robert Baron Fagel (1771-1856),

Netherlands Envoy to the several Courts of France from 1814 to

1854.--T.]

[Footnote 488: DUCHESSE D'ABRANTÈS, _Histoire des Salons de Paris.

Tableaux et portraits du grande monde, sous Louis XVI., le Directoire,

le Consulat et l'Empire, la Restauration et le règne de Louis-Philippe

Ier,_ Vol. VII.--B.]

[Footnote 489: Ex-Lieutenant (not Captain) Roger had taken part with

Caron in the Colmar plot. He was condemned to death on the 23rd of

February 1823. The penalty was commuted to one of twenty years' penal

servitude. He was sent to the convict prison at Toulon and obtained a

full pardon at the end of two years.--B.]

[Footnote 490: Lieutenant-Colonel Augustin Joseph Caron (1774-1822),

the ringleader of the plot, was sentenced to death, in September 1822,

and executed before the Court of Cassation had rejected his appeal.--T.]

[Footnote 491: Gustavus II. Adolphus King of Sweden (1594-1632), the

great antagonist of Austria, at that time France's foremost rival.--T.]

[Footnote 492: _Purg._, Canto VIII., 6.--T.]

[Footnote 493: Daniel Steibelt (1765-1823), a Prussian pianist and

composer, came to Paris in 1790. His _Romeo and Juliet_ was performed

at the Théâtre de l'Opera-Comique National on the 10th of September

1793, in the midst of the Terror.--B.]

APPENDIX TO BOOK XI

(By M. EDMOND BIRÉ)

THE CONGRESS OF VERONA AND THE SPANISH WAR

The Memoirs present a voluntary and compulsory gap. Nothing is

said of the twenty months (October 1822 to June 1824) during which

Chateaubriand was, first, French Ambassador at the Congress of Verona

and, later, Minister of Foreign Affairs in Paris; nothing of the

Spanish War, which was nevertheless his work. Certainly he had no

intention of placing in the shade the very events to which the honour

of his name as a statesman is attached. He wished, on the contrary,

to speak of them at his ease. Of all the various periods of his life,

it is this which assumed the greatest development under his pen: a

development so great that this narrative at first formed four volumes,

reduced later to two, under circumstances which I will presently

relate. Those two volumes in reality form an integral portion of the

Mémoires d'Outre-tombe. That they do not figure there is due to the

fact that the author feared, by giving them a place in his Memoirs, to

disturb the fine ordering of his book, in which the proportions are

so well preserved, in which all the parts of the work harmonize among

themselves with an art so perfect. For this reason, and also in order

publicly to revenge the Restoration for the calumnies of which it was

then the daily object, he decided, in 1838, to publish as a separate

work all that he had written on the Congress of Verona and the Spanish

War.

His manuscript, as I have just said, formed four volumes. This meant

eighty thousand francs (twenty thousand francs per volume) which fell

due to him, under the terms of his contract with the syndicate which

possessed the right of publishing his future works. The four volumes

were almost printed, when M. de Marcellus and M. de La Ferronnays,

alarmed at seeing certain diplomatic documents brought to light

which were destined, according to them, to remain secret, entreated

Chateaubriand to sacrifice, here, there and everywhere, documents

which, nevertheless, possessed the liveliest interest He consented to

most of the curtailments asked for, and gave his friends such liberal

measure that the original four volumes became reduced to two actual

volumes.

"Well," said Chateaubriand to M. de Marcellus, when the sacrifice was

consummated, "the two of you cost me forty thousand francs."

"Be it so," rejoined M. de Marcellus; "rather forty thousand francs

than regrets when it is too late."

And Chateaubriand replied:

"The thing is done now; I have respected your scruples and La

Ferronnays'; I have struck out a great deal to please you. But neither

of you has placed himself sufficiently, in thought, outside his century

and public affairs. To judge of an effect of tone, we should place

ourselves at a distance. It is by saying all that one distinguishes

one's self from the herd of buttoned-up and over-scrupulous statesmen.

I have conceived diplomacy on a new plan; I speak out. You are wrong

to dread my revelations; they could only do you credit. I tell you:

you will do later, La Ferronnays or you, when you think the danger

lessened, and for the same reasons, what you are preventing me from

doing now. As far as I am concerned, I give you my authorization

beforehand[494]."

Since Chateaubriand was induced to leave out of his Memoirs the Spanish

War, which was "the great political event of his life," it is fitting

that I should here remind the reader, if only in a few words, that

this war was an act of high and great politics and not, as the enemies

of the Restoration have repeated to satiety, an act of "servitude and

subjection to the Northern Cabinets."

When M. de Montmorency, then Minister for Foreign Affairs, went to

the Congress of Verona, he was the bearer of positive instructions

containing these very words:

"France being the sole Power which is to act with her troops, she will

be the sole judge of that necessity. The plenipotentiaries must not

consent that the Congress should lay down the conduct of France with

regard to Spain."

[Sidenote: Appendix to Book XI.]

Led away by the generosity and elevation of his sentiments, which

sometimes assumed a tinge of mysticism, to embrace a policy in which

the private initiative of each nation should disappear before the

decisions taken in common by a sort of directorate of the Great Powers

charged to secure the universal prevalence of the interests of justice

and humanity, the loyal and chivalrous Mathieu de Montmorency had been

induced to demand that Russia, Austria, Prussia and France should

address a final notice to Spain, after which the ambassadors were to

be recalled. M. de Villèle declared himself against this collective

action, in the council of ministers held at the Tuileries on the 25th

of January 1822. He claimed the right of France to intervene alone.

Louis XVIII. sided with his opinion, and declared that "France occupied

a special position towards Spain; that for her to recall her ambassador

was either too much or too little;" then he added:

"Louis XIV. destroyed the Pyrenees, I will not allow them to be set up

again; he placed my House on the Throne of Spain, I shall not allow

it to fall from it; my Ambassador must not leave Madrid before the

day when a hundred thousand Frenchmen are pushing forward to take his

place."

To speak in this way was to separate the action of France from that of

the other Powers; M. Duvergier de Hauranne does not hesitate to admit

this[495]. It was to disown M. de Montmorency; he forthwith resigned

his office. He had wished to make the Spanish question an European

question; with Chateaubriand, his successor, it became a French

question. At this the head of the British Cabinet, Mr. Canning[496],

displayed a profound irritation. The hostility of England did not stop

the Government of Louis XVIII.:

"Keep up a high tone with the English ministers," wrote

Chateaubriand, on the 16th of January 1823, to M. de

Marcellus, France's representative in London.

"Say and repeat to Mr. Canning," he wrote again in a dispatch

dated 28th January, "that we are as anxious for peace as he,

and that England can obtain it before the opening of the

campaign, if she will hold the same language as ourselves and

demand the liberty of the King. But be sure to add that our

decision is taken, and that _nothing will make us go back._"

And on the 13th of March 1823:

"Mr. Canning is angry with me for not yielding to his threats

and casting France at the knees of England. He cannot go to

war, he has not so much as one half a plausible reason for

doing so, he feels this, and he is piqued at having gone so

far. But _war or no war, France will do what she must do, or

I shall cease to be minister..._"

And, in a postscript:

"Give parties, and _answer Mr. Canning firmly._"

On the 17th of April:

"England feels that _this war is giving us back our influence

and restoring us to our place in Europe_; she must needs be

irritated and ill-disposed. Mr. Canning's self-esteem is

compromised: hence his violence and his ill-humour.... I

recommend you henceforth to show yourself cold and reserved

with Mr. Canning.... Be polite, but talk little; and let him

see, by your manner, _that the French Government knows its

strength and defends its dignity._[497]"

The deeds were on a level with the words. Chateaubriand's policy had

been able and firm: a prosperous and well-managed war crowned it. Read

in what terms Benjamin Constant and General Foy, although speaking in

the name of the Opposition, judged the Spanish War:

"So far from contesting what our honourable colleague has

said on past events, I wish to recognise with him that the

whole of that memorable expedition has been full of glory

for our army, and I will add that this glory is so much

the finer in that it does not consist solely of military

successes. French generosity, inspiring even our private

soldiers, has always worked and sometimes happily succeeded

in making humanity prevail over vengeance, pity over fury,

and in protecting the disarmed enemy against the auxiliary

embittered by long reverses."

Thus did Benjamin Constant express himself in the tribune of the

Chamber of Deputies, on the 28th of June 1824. In the same sitting,

General Foy added these words:

[Sidenote: Appendix to Book XI.]

"The swiftness of the operations in Spain and the plenitude of the

military success have deceived the expectations of those who were

opposed to the war and surpassed the hopes of those who wished for it."

All truly liberal minds have agreed to recognise that the Spanish

War was not only politic, but legitimate and, above all, national.

While strengthening the Government at home, it restored to France her

liberty of action abroad. The Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle had freed

our territory. The Congress of Verona and the campaign which followed

emancipated our policy. We once more became a great nation.

M. Guizot was, in 1823, one of the opponents of the expedition; this

did not prevent him, when he had himself passed through public life,

from writing in his Memoirs:

"As a bold stroke of dynastic and party politics, the

Spanish War succeeded fully. The sinister forebodings of

its adversaries were belied and the hopes of its supporters

surpassed. Put to the test together, the loyalty of the army

and the powerlessness of the conspirators seeking refuge

abroad were made manifest at the same time. The expedition

was an easy one, although not without glory. The Duc

d'Angoulême covered himself with credit. The prosperity and

tranquillity of France suffered from it in no way[498]."

Lastly, Sir Robert Peel, in a conversation with M. de Marcellus, thus

summed up the results of the campaign:

"Providence is on your side, you were right.... You have won a real

influence on the Continent: a loyal army; flourishing finances; an

heir to the Crown who has acquired as much glory by his courage as his

moderation[499]."

[Footnote 494: COMTE DE MARCELLUS, _Politique de la Restauration en

1822 et 1823_, p. 49--B.]

[Footnote 495: DUVERGIER DE HAURANNE, _Histoire du gouvernement

parlementaire en France_, Vol. VII. p. 218.--B.]

[Footnote 496: Lord Liverpool was Prime Minister, Canning Secretary of

State for Foreign Affairs, in 1823.--T.]

[Footnote 497: MARCELLUS, _Politique de la Restauration_, pp. 123, 128,

169, 201.--B.]

[Footnote 498: GUIZOT, _Mémoires_, Vol. I. p. 258.--B.]

[Footnote 499: MARCELLUS, _Politique de la Restauration_, p. 274.--B.]

The Memoirs of François René Vicomte de Chateaubriand sometime Ambassador to England, Volume 4 (of 6) Mémoires d'outre-tombe volume 4 · 第 7 / 9 章