The Greeks had innumerable monuments of the sort, which I have been

describing. They were taken for the tombs of departed heroes, but were

really consecrated places: and the names by which they were distinguished,

shew plainly their true history. Such was the supposed tomb of [427]Orion

at Tanagra, and of Phoroneus in [428]Argolis; the tomb of [429]Deucalion in

Athens; and of his wife [430]Pyrrha in Locris: of [431]Endymion in Elis: of

Tityus in [432]Panopea: of Asterion in the island [433]Lade: of the

Egyptian [434]Belus in Achaia. To these may be added the tombs of Zeus in

Mount Sipylus, Mount Iasius, and Ida: the tombs of Osiris in various parts:

and those of Isis, which have been enumerated before. Near the AEaceum at

Epidaurus was a hill, reputed to have been the tomb of the hero

[435]Phocus. This AEaceum was an inclosure planted with olive trees of great

antiquity; and at a small degree above the surface of the ground was an

altar sacred to AEacus. To divulge the traditions relative to this altar

would, it seems, be an high profanation. The author, therefore, keeps them

a secret. Just before this sacred septum was the supposed tomb of Phocus,

consisting of a mound of raised earth, fenced round with a border of stone

work: and a large rough stone was placed upon the top of all. Such were the

rude monuments of Greece, which were looked upon as so many receptacles of

the dead: but were high altars, with their sacred [Greek: temene], which

had been erected for divine worship in the most early times. The

Helladians, and the Persians, were of the same [436]family: hence we find

many similar rites subsisting among the two nations. The latter adhered to

the purer Zabaism, which they maintained a long time. They erected the same

sacred Tupha, as the Grecians: and we may be assured of the original

purpose, for which these hills were raised, from the use to which they put

them. They were dedicated to the great fountain of light, called by the

Persians, Anait: and were set apart as Puratheia, for the celebration of

the rites of fire. This people, after they had defeated the Sacae in

Cappadocia, raised an immense Comah in memorial of their victory.

[437]Strabo, who describes it very minutely, tells us, that they chose a

spot in an open plain; where they reared a Petra, or high place, by heaping

up a vast mound of earth. This they fashioned to a conical figure; and then

surrounded it with a wall of stone. In this manner they founded a kind of

temple in honour of Anait, Omanus, and Anandrates, the Deities of their

country. I have mentioned that the Egyptians had hills of this nature: and

from them the custom was transmitted to Greece. Typhon, or more properly

Tuphon, [Greek: Tuphon], who was supposed to have been a giant, was a

compound of Tuph-On, as I have before mentioned; and signified a sacred

[438]mount of the sun. Those cities in Egypt, which had a high place of

this sort, and rites in consequence of it, were styled Typhonian. Upon such

as these they sacrificed red haired men, or men with hair of a light

colour; in other words strangers. For both the sons of Chus, and the

Mizraim were particularly dark and woolly: so that there could be no surer

mark than the hair to distinguish between a native and a foreigner. These

sacrifices were offered in the city [439]Idithia, [440]Abaris,

[441]Heliopolis, and Taphosiris; which in consequence of these offerings

were denominated Typhonian cities. Many writers say, that these rites were

performed to Typhon at the [442]tomb of Osiris. Hence he was in later times

supposed to have been a person, one of immense size: and he was also

esteemed a [443]God. But this arose from the common mistake by which places

were substituted for the Deities there worshipped. Typhon was the Tupha, or

altar, the supposed tomb of the God: and the offerings were made to the

Sun, styled On; the same as Osiris, and Busiris. As there were Typhonian

mounts in many parts, he was in consequence of it supposed to have been

buried in different places: near mount Caucasus in Colchis; near the river

Orontes in Syria; and under lake Serbonis. Typhon, or rather Typhonian

worship, was not unknown in the region of [444]Troas, near which were the

Scopuli Typhonis. Plutarch mentions that in the Phrygian Theology Typhon

was esteemed the grandson of Isaac or Isaeac: and says that he was so spoken

of [Greek: en tois Phrugiois] [445][Greek: grammasin]. But all terms of

relation are to be disregarded. The purport of the history was this. The

altar was termed Tuphon Isiac, sive [Greek: Bomos Isiakos], from the sacra

Isiaca, which were performed upon it. The same Isaac or Isaeac was sometimes

rendered AEsacus, and supposed to have been a son of the river Granicus.

[446]AEsacon umbrosa furtim peperisse sub Ida

Fertur Alexirhoe Granico nata bicorni.

The antient Arcadians were said to have been the offspring of [447]Typhon,

and by some the children of Atlas; by which was meant, that they were

people of the Typhonian, and Atlantian religion. What they called his tombs

were certainly mounds of earth, raised very high, like those which have

been mentioned before: only with this difference, that some of these had

lofty towers adorned with pinnacles, and battlements. They had also carved

upon them various symbols; and particularly serpentine hieroglyphics, in

memorial of the God to whom they were sacred. In their upper story was a

perpetual fire, which was plainly seen in the night. I have mentioned, that

the poets formed their notions about Otus and Ephialtes from towers: and

the idea of Orion's stupendous bulk taken from the Pelorian edifice in

Sicily. The gigantic stature of Typhon was borrowed from a like object: and

his character was formed from the hieroglyphical representations in the

temples styled Typhonian. This may be inferred from the allegorical

description of Typhoeus, given by Hesiod. Typhon and Typhoeus, were the

same personage: and the poet represents him of a mixed form, being partly a

man, and partly a monstrous dragon, whose head consisted of an assemblage

of smaller serpents.

[448][Greek: Ek de hoi omon]

[Greek: En hekaton kephalai ophios, deinoio Drakontos.]

As there was a perpetual fire kept up in the upper story, he describes it

as shining through the apertures in the building.

[449][Greek: Ek de hoi osson]

[Greek: Thespesieis kephaleisin hup' ophrusi pur amarusse;]

[Greek: Paseon d' ek kephaleon pur kaieto derkomenoio.]

But the noblest description of Typhon is given in some very fine poetry by

Nonnus. He has taken his ideas from some antient tower situated near the

sea upon the summit of an high mountain. It was probably the Typhonian

temple of Zeus upon mount Casius, near the famed Serbonian lake. He

mentions sad noises heard within, and describes the roaring of the surge

below: and says that all the monsters of the sea stabled in the cavities at

the foot of the mountain, which was washed by the ocean.

[450][Greek: En ichthuoenti de pontoi]

[Greek: Histamenou Tuphonos eso bruoentos enaulou]

[Greek: Benthei tarsa pepekto, kai eeri mignuto gaster]

[Greek: Thlibomene nepheessi; Giganteiou de karenou]

[Greek: Phrikton aersilophon aion bruchema leonton,]

[Greek: Pontios eiluoenti leon ekalupteto kolpoi. ktl.]

We may perceive, that this is a mixed description, wherein, under the

character of a gigantic personage, a towering edifice is alluded to; which

was situated upon the summit of a mountain, and in the vicinity of the sea.

* * * * *

OB, OUB, PYTHO,

SIVE DE

OPHIOLATRIA.

[Greek: Para panti ton nomizomenon par' humin Theon Ophis sumbolon mega

kai musterion anagraphetai.] Justin. Martyr. Apolog. l. 1. p. 60.

It may seem extraordinary, that the worship of the serpent should have ever

been introduced into the world: and it must appear still more remarkable,

that it should almost universally have prevailed. As mankind are said to

have been ruined through the influence of this being, we could little

expect that it would, of all other objects, have been adopted, as the most

sacred and salutary symbol; and rendered the chief object of

[451]adoration. Yet so we find it to have been. In most of the antient

rites there is some allusion to the [452]serpent. I have taken notice, that

in the Orgies of Bacchus, the persons who partook of the ceremony used to

carry serpents in their hands, and with horrid screams called upon Eva,

Eva. They were often crowned with [453]serpents, and still made the same

frantic exclamation. One part of the mysterious rites of Jupiter Sabazius

was to let a snake slip down the bosom of the person to be initiated, which

was taken out below[454]. These ceremonies, and this symbolic worship,

began among the Magi, who were the sons of Chus: and by them they were

propagated in various parts. Epiphanius thinks, that the invocation, Eva,

Eva, related to the great [455]mother of mankind, who was deceived by the

serpent: and Clemens of Alexandria is of the same opinion. He supposes,

that by this term was meant [456][Greek: Euan ekeinen, di' hen he plane

parekolouthese.] But I should think, that Eva was the same as Eph, Epha,

Opha, which the Greeks rendered [Greek: Ophis], Ophis, and by it denoted a

serpent. Clemens acknowledges, that the term Eva properly aspirated had

such a signification. [457][Greek: To onoma to Euia dasunomenon

hermeneuetai Ophis.] Olympias, the mother of [458]Alexander, was very fond

of these Orgies, in which the serpent was introduced. Plutarch mentions,

that rites of this sort were practised by the Edonian women near mount

Haemus in Thrace; and carried on to a degree of madness. Olympias copied

them closely in all their frantic manoeuvres. She used to be followed with

many attendants, who had each a thyrsus with [459]serpents twined round it.

They had also snakes in their hair, and in the chaplets, which they wore;

so that they made a most fearful appearance. Their cries were very

shocking: and the whole was attended with a continual repetition of the

words, [460]Evoe, Saboe, Hues Attes, Attes Hues, which were titles of the

God Dionusus. He was peculiarly named [Greek: Hues]; and his priests were

the Hyades, and Hyantes. He was likewise styled Evas. [461][Greek: Euas ho

Dionusos.]

In Egypt was a serpent named Thermuthis, which was looked upon as very

sacred; and the natives are said to have made use of it as a royal tiara,

with which they ornamented the statues of [462]Isis. We learn from Diodorus

Siculus, that the kings of Egypt wore high bonnets, which terminated in a

round ball: and the whole was surrounded with figures of [463]asps. The

priests likewise upon their bonnets had the representation of serpents. The

antients had a notion, that when Saturn devoured his own children, his wife

Ops deceived him by substituting a large stone in lieu of one of his sons,

which stone was called Abadir. But Ops, and Opis, represented here as a

feminine, was the serpent Deity, and Abadir is the same personage under a

different denomination. [464]Abadir Deus est; et hoc nomine lapis ille,

quem Saturnus dicitur devorasse pro Jove, quem Graeci [Greek: baitulon]

vocant.--Abdir quoque et Abadir [Greek: baitulos]. Abadir seems to be a

variation of Ob-Adur, and signifies the serpent God Orus. One of these

stones, which Saturn was supposed to have swallowed instead of a child,

stood, according to [465]Pausanias, at Delphi. It was esteemed very sacred,

and used to have libations of wine poured upon it daily; and upon festivals

was otherwise honoured. The purport of the above history I imagine to have

been this. It was for a long time a custom to offer children at the altar

of Saturn: but in process of time they removed it, and in its room erected

a [Greek: stulos], or stone pillar; before which they made their vows, and

offered sacrifices of another nature. This stone, which they thus

substituted, was called Ab-Adar, from the Deity represented by it. The term

Ab generally signifies a [466]father: but, in this instance, it certainly

relates to a serpent, which was indifferently styled Ab, Aub, and [467]Ob.

I take Abadon, or, as it is mentioned in the Revelations, Abaddon, to have

been the name of the same Ophite God, with whose worship the world had been

so long infected. He is termed by the Evangelist [468][Greek: Abaddon, ton

Angelon tes Abussou], the angel of the bottomless pit; that is, the prince

of darkness. In another place he is described as the [469]dragon, that old

serpent, which is the devil, and Satan. Hence I think, that the learned

Heinsius is very right in the opinion, which he has given upon this

passage; when he makes Abaddon the same as the serpent Pytho. Non

dubitandum est, quin Pythius Apollo, hoc est spurcus ille spiritus, quem

Hebraei Ob, et Abaddon, Hellenistae ad verbum [Greek: Apolluona], caeteri

[Greek: Apollona], dixerunt, sub hac forma, qua miseriam humano generi

invexit, primo cultus[470].

[Illustration: _Ophis Thermuthis, sive Ob Basiliscus AEgyptiacus cum

Sacerdote Supplicante._]

[Illustration: Pl. VII.]

It is said, that, in the ritual of Zoroaster, the great expanse of the

heavens, and even nature itself, was described under the symbol of a

serpent[471]. The like was mentioned in the Octateuch of Ostanes: and

moreover, that in Persis and in other parts of the east they erected

temples to the serpent tribe, and held festivals to their honour, esteeming

them [472][Greek: Theous tous megistous, kai archegous ton holon], _the

supreme of all Gods, and the superintendants of the whole world_. The

worship began among the people of Chaldea. They built the city Opis upon

the [473]Tigris, and were greatly addicted to divination, and to the

worship of the serpent[474]. Inventi sunt ex iis (Chaldeis) augures, et

magi, divinatores, et sortilegi, et inquirentes Ob, et Ideoni. From Chaldea

the worship passed into Egypt, where the serpent Deity was called Can-oph,

Can-eph, and C'neph. It had also the name of Ob, or Oub, and was the same

as the Basiliscus, or Royal Serpent; the same also as the Thermuthis: and

in like manner was made use of by way of ornament to the statues of their

[475]Gods. The chief Deity of Egypt is said to have been Vulcan, who was

also styled Opas, as we learn from [476]Cicero. He was the same as Osiris,

the Sun; and hence was often called Ob-El, sive Pytho Sol: and there were

pillars sacred to him with curious hieroglyphical inscriptions, which had

the same name. They were very lofty, and narrow in comparison of their

length; hence among the Greeks, who copied from the Egyptians, every thing

gradually tapering to a point was styled Obelos, and Obeliscus. Ophel

(Oph-El) was a name of the same purport: and I have shewn, that many sacred

mounds, or Tapha, were thus denominated from the serpent Deity, to whom

they were sacred.

Sanchoniathon makes mention of an history, which he once wrote upon the

worship of the serpent. The title of this work, according to Eusebius was,

[477]Ethothion, or Ethothia. Another treatise upon the same subject was

written by Pherecydes Syrus, which was probably a copy of the former; for

he is said to have composed it, [478][Greek: para Phoinikon labon tas

aphormas], _from some previous accounts of the Phenicians_. The title of

his book was the Theology of Ophion, styled Ophioneus; and of his

worshippers, called Ophionidae. Thoth, and Athoth, were certainly titles of

the Deity in the Gentile world: and the book of Sanchoniathon might very

possibly have been from hence named Ethothion, or more truly Athothion. But

from the subject, upon which it was written, as well as from the treatise

of Pherecydes, I should think, that Athothion, or Ethothion, was a mistake

for Ath-ophion, a title which more immediately related to that worship, of

which the writer treated. _Ath_ was a sacred title, as I have shewn: and I

imagine, that this dissertation did not barely relate to the serpentine

Deity; but contained accounts of his votaries, the Ophitae, the principal of

which were the sons of Chus. The worship of the Serpent began among them;

and they were from thence denominated Ethopians, and Aithopians, which the

Greeks rendered [Greek: Aithiopes]. It was a name, which they did not

receive from their complexion, as has been commonly surmised; for the

branch of Phut, and the Lubim, were probably of a deeper die: but they were

so called from Ath-Ope, and Ath-Opis, the God which they worshipped. This

may be proved from Pliny. He says that the country AEthiopia (and

consequently the people) had the name of AEthiop from a personage who was a

Deity--ab [479]AEthiope Vulcani filio. The AEthiopes brought these rites into

Greece: and called the island, where they first established them,

[480]Ellopia, Solis Serpentis insula. It was the same as Euboea, a name of

the like purport; in which island was a region named AEthiopium. Euboea is

properly Oub-Aia; and signifies the Serpent Island. The same worship

prevailed among the Hyperboreans, as we may judge from the names of the

sacred women, who used to come annually to Delos. They were priestesses of

the Tauric Goddess, and were denominated from her titles.

[481][Greek: Oupis te, Loxo te, kai Euaion Hekaerge.]

Hercules was esteemed the chief God, the same as Chronus; and was said to

have produced the Mundane egg. He was represented in the Orphic Theology

under the mixed symbol of a [482]lion and serpent: and sometimes of a

[483]serpent only. I have before mentioned, that the Cuthites under the

title of Heliadae settled at Rhodes: and, as they were Hivites or Ophites,

that the island in consequence of it was of old named Ophiusa. There was

likewise a tradition, that it had once swarmed with [484]serpents. The like

notion prevailed almost in every place, where they settled. They came under

the more general titles of Leleges and Pelasgi: but more particularly of

Elopians, Europians, Oropians, Asopians, Inopians, Ophionians, and

AEthiopes, as appears from the names, which they bequeathed; and in most

places, where they resided, there were handed down traditions, which

alluded to their original title of Ophites. In Phrygia, and upon the

Hellespont, whither they sent out colonies very early, was a people styled

[Greek: Ophiogeneis], or the serpent-breed; who were said to retain an

affinity and correspondence with [485]serpents. And a notion prevailed,

that some hero, who had conducted them, was changed from a serpent to a

man. In Colchis was a river Ophis; and there was another of the same name

in Arcadia. It was so named from a body of people, who settled upon its

banks, and were said to have been conducted by a serpent: [486][Greek: Ton

hegemona genesthai drakonta]. These reptiles are seldom found in islands,

yet Tenos, one of the Cyclades, was supposed to have once swarmed with

them. [487][Greek: En tei Tenoi, miai ton Kukladon nesoi, opheis kai

skorpioi deinoi eginonto.] Thucydides mentions a people of AEtolia called

[488]Ophionians: and the temple of Apollo at Patara in Lycia seems to have

had its first institution from a priestess of the same [489]name. The

island of Cyprus was styled Ophiusa, and Ophiodes, from the serpents, with

which it was supposed to have [490]abounded. Of what species they were is

no where mentioned; excepting only that about Paphos there was said to have

been a [491]kind of serpent with two legs. By this is meant the Ophite

race, who came from Egypt, and from Syria, and got footing in this

[492]island. They settled also in Crete, where they increased greatly in

numbers; so that Minos was said by an unseemly allegory, [493][Greek:

opheis ouresai], serpentes minxisse. The island Seriphus was one vast rock,

by the Romans called [494]saxum seriphium; and made use of as a larger kind

of prison for banished persons. It is represented as having once abounded

with serpents; and it is styled by Virgil _serpentifera_, as the passage is

happily corrected by Scaliger.

[495]AEginamque simul, serpentiferamque Seriphon.

It had this epithet not on account of any real serpents, but according to

the Greeks from [496]Medusa's head, which was brought hither by Perseus. By

this is meant the serpent Deity, whose worship was here introduced by

people called Peresians. Medusa's head denoted divine wisdom: and the

island was sacred to the serpent as is apparent from its name[497]. The

Athenians were esteemed Serpentigenae; and they had a tradition, that the

chief guardian of their Acropolis was a [498]serpent. It is reported of the

Goddess Ceres, that she placed a dragon for a guardian to her temple at

[499]Eleusis; and appointed another to attend upon Erectheus. AEgeus of

Athens, according to Androtion, was of the [500]serpent breed: and the

first king of the country is said to have been [501][Greek: Drakon], a

Dragon. Others make Cecrops the first who reigned. He is said to have been

[502][Greek: diphues], _of a twofold nature_; [Greek: sumphues echon soma

andros kai drakontos], _being formed with the body of a man blended with

that of a serpent_. Diodorus says, that this was a circumstance deemed by

the Athenians inexplicable: yet he labours to explain it, by representing

Cecrops, as half a man, and half a [503]brute; because he had been of two

different communities. Eustathius likewise tries to solve it nearly upon

the same principles, and with the like success. Some had mentioned of

Cecrops, that he underwent a metamorphosis, [504][Greek: apo opheos eis

anthropon elthein], _that he was changed from a serpent to a man_. By this

was signified according to Eustathius, that Cecrops, by coming into Hellas,

divested himself of all the rudeness and barbarity of his [505]country, and

became more civilized and humane. This is too high a compliment to be payed

to Greece in its infant state, and detracts greatly from the character of

the Egyptians. The learned Marsham therefore animadverts with great

justice. [506]Est verisimilius ilium ex AEgypto mores magis civiles in

Graeciam induxisse. _It is more probable, that he introduced into Greece,

the urbanity of his own country, than that he was beholden to Greece for

any thing from thence._ In respect to the mixed character of this

personage, we may, I think, easily account for it. Cecrops was certainly a

title of the Deity, who was worshipped under this [507]emblem. Something of

the like nature was mentioned of Triptolemus, and [508]Ericthonius: and the

like has been said above of Hercules. The natives of Thebes in Boeotia,

like the Athenians above, esteemed themselves of the serpent race. The

Lacedaemonians likewise referred themselves to the same original. Their city

is said of old to have swarmed with [509]serpents. The same is said of the

city Amyclae in Italy, which was of Spartan original. They came hither in

such abundance, that it was abandoned by the [510]inhabitants. Argos was

infested in the same manner, till Apis came from Egypt, and settled in that

city. He was a prophet, the reputed son of Apollo, and a person of great

skill and sagacity. To him they attributed the blessing of having their

country freed from this evil.

[511][Greek: Apis gar elthon ek peras Naupaktias,]

[Greek: Iatromantis, pais Apollonos, chthona]

[Greek: Ten d' ekkathairei knodalon brotophthoron.]

Thus the Argives gave the credit to this imaginary personage of clearing

their land of this grievance: but the brood came from the very quarter from

whence Apis was supposed to have arrived. They were certainly Hivites from

Egypt: and the same story is told of that country. It is represented as

having been of old over-run with serpents; and almost depopulated through

their numbers. Diodorus Siculus seems to understand this [512]literally:

but a region, which was annually overflowed, and that too for so long a

season, could not well be liable to such a calamity. They were serpents of

another nature, with which it was thus infested: and the history relates to

the Cuthites, the original Ophitae, who for a long time possessed that

country. They passed from Egypt to Syria, and to the Euphrates: and mention

is made of a particular breed of serpents upon that river, which were

harmless to the natives, but fatal to every body else. [513]This, I think,

cannot be understood literally. The wisdom of the serpent may be great; but

not sufficient to make these distinctions. These serpents were of the same

nature as the [514]birds of Diomedes, and the dogs in the temple of Vulcan:

and these histories relate to Ophite priests, who used to spare their own

people, and sacrifice strangers, a custom which prevailed at one time in

most parts of the world. I have mentioned that the Cuthite priests were

very learned: and as they were Ophites, whoever had the advantage of their

information, was said to have been instructed by serpents. Hence there was

a tradition, that Melampus was rendered prophetic from a communication with

these [515]animals. Something similar is said of Tiresias.

As the worship of the serpent was of old so prevalent, many places, as well

as people from thence, received their names. Those who settled in Campania

were called Opici; which some would have changed to Ophici; because they

were denominated from serpents. [516][Greek: Oi de (phasin) hoti Ophikoi

apo ton ophion.] But they are, in reality, both names of the same purport,

and denote the origin of the people. We meet with places called Opis,

Ophis, Ophitaea, Ophionia, Ophioessa, Ophiodes, and Ophiusa. This last was

an antient name, by which, according to Stephanus, the islands Rhodes,

Cythnus, Besbicus, Tenos, and the whole continent of Africa, were

distinguished. There were also cities so called. Add to these places

denominated Oboth, Obona, and reversed Onoba, from Ob, which was of the

same purport. Clemens Alexandrinus says, that the term Eva signified a

serpent, if pronounced with a proper [517]aspirate. We find that there were

places of this name. There was a city Eva in [518]Arcadia: and another in

[519]Macedonia. There was also a mountain Eva, or Evan, taken notice of by

[520]Pausanias, between which and Ithome lay the city Messene. He mentions

also an Eva in [521]Argolis, and speaks of it as a large town. Another name

for a serpent, of which I have as yet taken no notice, was Patan, or Pitan.

Many places in different parts were denominated from this term. Among

others was a city in [522]Laconia; and another in [523]Mysia, which

Stephanus styles a city of AEolia. They were undoubtedly so named from the

worship of the serpent, Pitan: and had probably Dracontia, where were

figures and devices relative to the religion which prevailed. Ovid mentions

the latter city, and has some allusions to its antient history, when he

describes Medea as flying through the air from Attica to Colchis.

[524]AEoliam Pitanem laeva de parte relinquit,

Factaque de saxo longi simulacra _Draconis_.

[Illustration: Pl. VIII.]

The city was situated upon the river Eva or Evan, which the Greeks rendered

[525]Evenus. It is remarkable, that the Opici, who are said to have been

denominated from serpents, had also the name of Pitanatae: at least one part

of that family were so called. [526][Greek: Tinas de kai Pitanatas

legesthai.] Pitanatae is a term of the same purport as Opici, and relates to

the votaries of Pitan, the serpent Deity, which was adored by that people.

Menelaus was of old styled [527]Pitanates, as we learn from Hesychius: and

the reason of it may be known from his being a Spartan, by which was

intimated one of the serpentigenae, or Ophites. Hence he was represented

with a serpent for a device upon his shield. It is said that a brigade, or

portion of infantry, was among some of the Greeks named [528]Pitanates; and

the soldiers, in consequence of it, must have been termed Pitanatae:

undoubtedly, because they had the Pitan, or serpent, for their

[529]standard. Analogous to this, among other nations, there were soldiers

called [530]Draconarii. I believe, that in most countries the military

standard was an emblem of the Deity there worshipped.

A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume 2 (of 6) · 第 8 / 26 段