ELIZABETH B. BARRETT.

[Footnote 1: 'Not yet reached the prelude' (Aesch. _Prom._ 741).]

_R.B. to E.B.B._

Hatcham, Tuesday.

[Post-mark, February 11, 1845.]

Dear Miss Barrett,--People would hardly ever tell falsehoods about a

matter, if they had been let tell truth in the beginning, for it is

hard to prophane one's very self, and nobody who has, for instance,

used certain words and ways to a mother or a father _could_, even if

by the devil's help he _would_, reproduce or mimic them with any

effect to anybody else that was to be won over--and so, if 'I love

you' were always outspoken when it might be, there would, I suppose,

be no fear of its desecration at any after time. But lo! only last

night, I had to write, on the part of Mr. Carlyle, to a certain

ungainly, foolish gentleman who keeps back from him, with all the

fussy impotence of stupidity (not bad feeling, alas! for _that_ we

could deal with) a certain MS. letter of Cromwell's which completes

the collection now going to press; and this long-ears had to be 'dear

Sir'd and obedient servanted' till I _said_ (to use a mild word)

'commend me to the sincerities of this kind of thing.'! When I spoke

of you knowing little of me, one of the senses in which I meant so was

this--that I would not well vowel-point my common-place letters and

syllables with a masoretic _other_ sound and sense, make my 'dear'

something intenser than 'dears' in ordinary, and 'yours ever' a

thought more significant than the run of its like. And all this came

of your talking of 'tiring me,' 'being too envious,' &c. &c., which I

should never have heard of had the plain truth looked out of my letter

with its unmistakable eyes. _Now_, what you say of the 'bowing,' and

convention that is to be, and _tant de façons_ that are not to be,

helps me once and for ever--for have I not a right to say simply that,

for reasons I know, for other reasons I don't exactly know, but might

if I chose to think a little, and for still other reasons, which, most

likely, all the choosing and thinking in the world would not make me

know, I had rather hear from you than see anybody else. Never you

care, dear noble Carlyle, nor you, my own friend Alfred over the sea,

nor a troop of true lovers!--Are not their fates written? there! Don't

you answer this, please, but, mind it is on record, and now then, with

a lighter conscience I shall begin replying to your questions. But

then--what I have printed gives _no_ knowledge of me--it evidences

abilities of various kinds, if you will--and a dramatic sympathy with

certain modifications of passion ... _that_ I think--But I never have

begun, even, what I hope I was born to begin and end--'R.B. a

poem'--and next, if I speak (and, God knows, feel), as if what you

have read were sadly imperfect demonstrations of even mere ability, it

is from no absurd vanity, though it might seem so--these scenes and

song-scraps _are_ such mere and very escapes of my inner power, which

lives in me like the light in those crazy Mediterranean phares I have

watched at sea, wherein the light is ever revolving in a dark gallery,

bright and alive, and only after a weary interval leaps out, for a

moment, from the one narrow chink, and then goes on with the blind

wall between it and you; and, no doubt, _then_, precisely, does the

poor drudge that carries the cresset set himself most busily to trim

the wick--for don't think I want to say I have not worked hard--(this

head of mine knows better)--but the work has been _inside_, and not

when at stated times I held up my light to you--and, that there is no

self-delusion here, I would prove to you (and nobody else), even by

opening this desk I write on, and showing what stuff, in the way of

wood, I _could_ make a great bonfire with, if I might only knock the

whole clumsy top off my tower! Of course, every writing body says the

same, so I gain nothing by the avowal; but when I remember how I have

done what was published, and half done what may never be, I say with

some right, you can know but little of me. Still, I _hope_ sometimes,

though phrenologists will have it that I _cannot_, and am doing

better with this darling 'Luria'--so safe in my head, and a tiny slip

of paper I cover with my thumb!

Then you inquire about my 'sensitiveness to criticism,' and I shall be

glad to tell you exactly, because I have, more than once, taken a

course you might else not understand. I shall live always--that is for

me--I am living here this 1845, that is for London. I write from a

thorough conviction that it is the duty of me, and with the belief

that, after every drawback and shortcoming, I do my best, all things

considered--that is for _me_, and, so being, the not being listened to

by one human creature would, I hope, in nowise affect me. But of

course I must, if for merely scientific purposes, know all about this

1845, its ways and doings, and something I do know, as that for a

dozen cabbages, if I pleased to grow them in the garden here, I might

demand, say, a dozen pence at Covent Garden Market,--and that for a

dozen scenes, of the average goodness, I may challenge as many

plaudits at the theatre close by; and a dozen pages of verse, brought

to the Rialto where verse-merchants most do congregate, ought to bring

me a fair proportion of the Reviewers' gold currency, seeing the other

traders pouch their winnings, as I do see. Well, when they won't pay

me for my cabbages, nor praise me for my poems, I may, if I please,

say 'more's the shame,' and bid both parties 'decamp to the crows,' in

Greek phrase, and _yet_ go very lighthearted back to a garden-full of

rose-trees, and a soul-full of comforts. If they had bought my greens

I should have been able to buy the last number of _Punch_, and go

through the toll-gate of Waterloo Bridge, and give the blind

clarionet-player a trifle, and all without changing my gold. If they

had taken to my books, my father and mother would have been proud of

this and the other 'favourable critique,' and--at least so folks

hold--I should have to pay Mr. Moxon less by a few pounds,

whereas--but you see! Indeed I force myself to say ever and anon, in

the interest of the market-gardeners regular, and Keatses proper,

'It's nothing to _you_, critics, hucksters, all of you, if I _have_

this garden and this conscience--I might go die at Rome, or take to

gin and the newspaper, for what _you_ would care!' So I don't quite

lay open my resources to everybody. But it does so happen, that I have

met with much more than I could have expected in this matter of kindly

and prompt recognition. I never wanted a real set of good hearty

praisers--and no bad reviewers--I am quite content with my share.

No--what I laughed at in my 'gentle audience' is a sad trick the real

admirers have of admiring at the wrong place--enough to make an

apostle swear. _That_ does make me savage--_never_ the other kind of

people; why, think now--take your own 'Drama of Exile' and let _me_

send it to the first twenty men and women that shall knock at your

door to-day and after--of whom the first five are the Postman, the

seller of cheap sealing-wax, Mr. Hawkins Junr, the Butcher for orders,

and the Tax-gatherer--will you let me, by Cornelius Agrippa's

assistance, force these five and these fellows to read, and report on,

this 'Drama'--and, when I have put these faithful reports into fair

English, do you believe they would be better than, if as good, as, the

general run of Periodical criticisms? Not they, I will venture to

affirm. But then--once again, I get these people together and give

them your book, and persuade them, moreover, that by praising it, the

Postman will be helping its author to divide Long Acre into two beats,

one of which she will take with half the salary and all the red

collar,--that a sealing-wax vendor will see red wafers brought into

vogue, and so on with the rest--and won't you just wish for your

_Spectators_ and _Observers_ and Newcastle-upon-Tyne--Hebdomadal

_Mercuries_ back again! You see the inference--I do sincerely esteem

it a perfectly providential and miraculous thing that they are so

well-behaved in ordinary, these critics; and for Keats and Tennyson to

'go softly all their days' for a gruff word or two is quite

inexplicable to me, and always has been. Tennyson reads the

_Quarterly_ and does as they bid him, with the most solemn face in the

world--out goes this, in goes that, all is changed and ranged. Oh me!

Out comes the sun, in comes the _Times_ and eleven strikes (it _does_)

already, and I have to go to Town, and I have no alternative but that

this story of the Critic and Poet, 'the Bear and the Fiddle,' should

'begin but break off in the middle'; yet I doubt--nor will you

henceforth, I know, say, 'I vex you, I am sure, by this lengthy

writing.' Mind that spring is coming, for all this snow; and know me

for yours ever faithfully,

The letters of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Barrett, Vol. 1 (of 2) 1845-1846 · 第 29 / 370 题