Chapter I

NEWTON FORSTER OR, THE MERCHANT SERVICE

BY CAPTAIN MARRYAT

LONDON J.M. DENT AND CO. BOSTON: LITTLE, BROWN AND CO. MDCCCXCV 1832,

1895

[Illustration]

Contents

CHAPTER I

CHAPTER II

CHAPTER III

CHAPTER IV

CHAPTER V

CHAPTER VI

CHAPTER VII

CHAPTER VIII

CHAPTER IX

CHAPTER X

CHAPTER XI

CHAPTER XII

CHAPTER XIII

CHAPTER XIV

CHAPTER XV

CHAPTER XVI

CHAPTER XVII

CHAPTER XVIII

CHAPTER XIX

CHAPTER XX

CHAPTER XXI

CHAPTER XXII

CHAPTER XXIII

CHAPTER XXIV

CHAPTER XXV

CHAPTER XXVI

CHAPTER XXVII

CHAPTER XXVIII

CHAPTER XXIX

CHAPTER XXX

CHAPTER XXXI

CHAPTER XXXII

CHAPTER XXXIII

CHAPTER XXXIV

CHAPTER XXXV

CHAPTER XXXVI

CHAPTER XXXVII

CHAPTER XXXVIII

CHAPTER XXXIX

CHAPTER XL

CHAPTER XLI

CHAPTER XLII

CHAPTER XLIII

CHAPTER XLIV

CHAPTER XLV

CHAPTER XLVI

CHAPTER XLVII

CHAPTER XLVIII

CHAPTER XLIX

CHAPTER L

CHAPTER LI

CHAPTER LII

CHAPTER LIII

Prefatory Note

_Newton Forster, or the Merchant Service_, first appeared in the

_Metropolitan Magazine_, 1832. It is one of the novels which specially

suggests a comparison between Marryat and Smollett, both authors having

described acts of impressment with vigour and indignation.

Jeffrey, of the _Edinburgh Review_, wrote to Mrs Marryat, January

1832:----

"That I have read it [_Newton Forster_] all through in the week I have

to finish the preparation of our Scotch Reform Bill (if you will forgive

me for mentioning such a thing) is proof enough, I think, that my

opinion is very favourable. It is certainly very entertaining, which I

take to be the first virtue of a work of this description; but it is

interesting as well as entertaining, and not only shows great power of

invention, but a very amiable nature and a kind heart."

The _Editor_ quoted on page 23 is presumably Marryat himself. At least

the footnote occurs in the first edition, and was probably reprinted

from the magazine, where the identity of editor and author was not so

patent.

It is here printed from the first edition, in three volumes; motto:

Honesty is the best policy. James Cochrane & Co., 1832.[1]

R.B.J.

[Footnote 1: Thompson has been changed to Johnson and, in another place,

Robinson to Robertson, in order to let the same characters act under one

name throughout the book.]

Newton Forster;

OR,

The Merchant Service

* * * * *

Chapter I

"And what is this new book the whole world makes such a rout about?

----Oh! 'tis out of all plumb, my lord,----quite an irregular thing;

not one of the angles at the four corners was a right angle. I had

my rule and compasses, my lord, in my pocket----Excellent critic!

"Grant me patience, just Heaven! Of all the cants which are canted

in this canting world----though the cant of hypocrites may be the

worst, the cant of criticism is the most tormenting!"----Sterne.

What authors in general may feel upon the subject I know not, but I have

discovered, since I so rashly took up my pen, that there are three

portions of a novel which are extremely difficult to arrange to the

satisfaction of a fastidious public.

The first is the beginning, the second the middle, and the third is the

end.

The painter who, in times of yore, exposed his canvas to universal

criticism, and found, to his mortification, that there was not a

particle of his composition which had not been pronounced defective by

one pseudo-critic or another, did not receive severer castigation than I

have experienced from the _unsolicited_ remarks of "d----d good-natured

friends."

"I like your first and second volume," said a tall, long-chinned,

short-sighted blue, dressed in yellow, peering into my face, as if her

eyes were magnifying glasses, and she was obtaining the true focus of

vision, "but you fall off in your last, which is all about that _nasty_

line-of-battle ship."

"I don't like your plot, sir," bawls out in a stentorian voice an

elderly gentleman; "I don't like your plot, sir," repeated he with an

air of authority, which he had long assumed, from supposing because

people would not be at the trouble of contradicting his opinions, that

they were incontrovertible--"there is nothing but death."

"Death, my dear sir," replied I, as if I was hailing the lookout man at

the mast-head, and hoping to soften him with my intentional bull; "is

not death, sir, a true picture of human life?"

"Ay, ay," growled he, either not hearing or not _taking_; "it's all very

well, but--there's too much killing in it."

"In a novel, sir, killing's no murder, you surely will admit; and you

must also allow something for professional feeling--''tis my

occupation;' and after five-and-twenty years of constant practice,

whether I wield the sword or the pen, the force of habit----"

"It won't do, sir," interrupted he; "the public don't like it.

Otherwise," continued this hypercritic, softening a little, "some of the

chapters are amusing, and, on the whole, it may be said to be

rather--that is--not unpleasantly written."

"I like your first and third volume, but not your second," squeaked out

_something_ intended to have been a woman, with shoulder-blades and

collar-bones, as De Ville would say, most strongly developed.

"Well now, I don't exactly agree with you, my dear Miss Peego; I think

the second and third volumes are by far the most _readable_" exclaimed

_another thing_, perched upon a chair, with her feet dangling half way

between her seat and the carpet.

"If I might presume upon my long standing in the service, Captain----,"

said a pompous general officer, whose back appeared to have been

_fished_ with the kitchen poker--"if I might venture to offer you

advice," continued he, leading me paternally by the arm a little on one

side, "it would be not again to attempt a defence of smuggling: I

consider, sir, that as an officer in his Majesty's service, you have

strangely committed yourself."

"It is not my defence, sir: they are the arguments of a smuggler."

"You wrote the book, sir," replied he, sharply; "I can assure you that I

should not be surprised if the Admiralty took notice of it."

"Indeed, sir!" replied I, with assumed alarm.

I received no answer, except a most significant nod of the head, as he

walked away.

But I have not yet arrived at the climax, which made me inclined to

exclaim, with the expiring Lion in the fable----

A midshipman--yes, reader, a midshipman--who had formerly belonged to my

ship and had trembled at my frown, ranged up alongside of me, and, with

a supercilious air, observed--

"I have read your book, and--there are _one_ or _two_ good things in

it."

Hear this, admirals and captains on half-pay! hear this, port-admirals

and captains afloat! I have often heard that the service was

deteriorating, going to the devil, but I never became a convert to the

opinion before.

Gracious Heaven! what a revengeful feeling is there in the exclamation

"O that mine adversary had _written a book_!" To be snarled at, and

bow-wowed at, in this manner, by those who find fault because their

intellect is not sufficient to enable them to appreciate! Authors, take

my resolution; which is, never to show your face until your work has

passed through the ordeal of the Reviews--keep your room for the month

after your literary labour. Reviews are like Jesuit father

confessors--guiding the opinions of the multitude, who blindly follow

the suggestions of those to whom they may have entrusted their literary

consciences. If your work is denounced and to be released at once from

your sufferings by one blow from the paw of a tiger, than to be worried

piecemeal by creatures who have all the will, but not the power, to

inflict the _coup de grace_?

The author of "Cloudesley," enumerating the qualifications necessary to

a writer of fiction, observes, "When he introduces his ideal personage

to the public, he enters upon his task with a preconception of the

qualities that belong to this being, the principle of his actions, and

its necessary concomitants, &c, &c." That such preparation ought to be

made, I will not deny; but were I to attempt an adherence to these

rules, the public would never be troubled with any production of mine.

It would be too tedious a journey in perspective for my wayward

intellect; and if I calculated stages before I ordered my horses, I

should abandon the attempt, and remain quietly at home. Mine is not a

journey of that methodical description; on the contrary, it is a ramble

hand-in-hand with Fancy, with a light heart and a lighter baggage; for

my whole wallet, when I set off, contains but one single idea--but ideas

are hermaphrodite, and these creatures of the brain are most prolific.

To speak more intelligibly, I never have made any arrangement of plot

when I commenced a work of fiction, and often finish a chapter without

having the slightest idea of what materials the ensuing one is to be

constructed. At times I feel so tired that I throw down the pen in

despair; but t is soon taken up again, and, like a pigmy Ant, it

seems to have imbibed fresh vigour from its prostration.

I remember when the "King's Own" was finished, I was as happy as a

pedestrian who had accomplished his thousand miles in a thousand hours.

My voluntary slavery was over, and I was emancipated. Where was I then?

I recollect; within two days' sail of the Lizard, returning home, after

a six weeks' cruise to discover a rock in the Atlantic, which never

existed except in the terrified or intoxicated noddle of some master of

a merchant vessel.

It was about half-past five in the evening, and I was alone in my

after-cabin, quite alone, as the captain of a man-of-war must be, even

when in presence of his ship's company. If being sent to sea has been

pronounced by the officers and men to be _transportation_, being the

captain of the ship may truly be designated as _solitary confinement_.

I could not send for any one to whom I could impart the

intelligence--there was no one whom I could expect to sympathise with

me, or to whom I could pour out the abundance of my joy; for that the

service prohibited. What could I do? Why, I could dance; so I sprang

from my chair, and singing the tune, commenced a quadrille

movement,--Tal de ral la, tal de ral la, lity, lity, lity, liddle-um,

tal de ral la, tal--

"Three bells, sir," cried the first lieutenant, who had opened my door

unperceived by me, and showed evident surprise at my motions; "shall we

beat to quarters?"--

"Certainly, Mr B--," replied I, and he disappeared.

But this interruption produced only a temporary cessation: I was in the

height of "Cavalier seul," when his head popped into the cabin--

"All present, and sober, sir," reported he, with a demure smile.

"Except the captain, I presume you are thinking," replied I.

"Oh! no, indeed, sir; I observed that you were very merry."

"I am, Mr B--, but not with wine; mine is a sort of intellectual

intoxication not provided for in the Articles of War."

"A what! sir?"

"Oh! something that you'll never get drunk upon, as you never look into

a book--beat a retreat."

"Ay, ay, sir," replied the first lieutenant; and he disappeared.

And I also beat a retreat to my sofa; and as I threw myself upon it,

mentally vowed that, for two months at the least, I never would take up

a pen. But we seldom make a vow which we do not eventually break; and

the reason is obvious. We vow only when hurried into excesses; we are

alarmed at the dominion which has been acquired over us by our feelings,

or by our habits. Checked for a time by an adherence to our resolutions,

they gradually recover their former strength, until they again break

forth, and we yield to their overpowering influence. A few days after I

had made the resolution, I found myself, like the sailor, _rewarding_ it

by writing more indefatigably than ever.

So now, reader, you may understand that I continue to write, as Tony

Lumpkin says, not to please my good-natured friends, "but because I

can't bear to disappoint myself;" for that which I commenced as an

amusement, and continued as a drudgery, has ended in becoming a

_confirmed habit_.

So much for the overture. Now let us draw up the curtain, and our actors

shall appear upon the stage.

Newton Forster · 第 1 / 53 章