CHAPTER II.

FLY FISHING.

So much has already been written on fly fishing by men of wide and varied

experience, that it is with no little diffidence the writers approach

the subject. Yet the more thoroughly the whole art of trout fishing is

explored, the more engrossing does it become, and, as experience is

gained, the more evident it appears that little is really known and that

a vast field still remains open for investigation.

It is not intended to try in this chapter to teach the art of fly

fishing, as more can be learned by observation, perseverance and practice

on the river, than by reading all that was ever written on the subject;

but it is desired, by emphasizing a few essential points, to help the

novice through his initial difficulties.

Some anglers who are only able to devote a few weeks during the season

to their pastime are content to go to the local tackle dealer or the

professional fisherman and to rely entirely on his advice. While it is

always well to consult the “local men”—quaint characters for the most

part and many of them cobblers by trade—it is often a mistake to rely

entirely upon them; for, if a man’s ambition be to get out of the rut and

to kill fish under difficult conditions, he must think for himself.

The “local man” often has a strong partiality for certain patterns of

flies, no matter what the conditions. Only recently the writers came

across a most glaring example of this particular tendency, which is

perhaps worth mentioning in order to illustrate their point. Arriving

at the river one September afternoon, they noticed on the opposite bank

the local professional, who is held in very high esteem as a fisherman.

He certainly casts as neat a line as the writers have ever seen thrown.

In answer to their enquiry, “What sport?”, they received the reply, “A

few,” and were more than a little astonished to learn that he was using

flies which, in their opinion, were more suitable for the end of July. It

is always a pleasure to see this man cast, so they sat down and watched

him. Time after time he put his flies in the most beautiful manner over

rising fish, but without result, although the water was coloured and the

fish continued to rise steadily. Soon one showed within casting distance

of the bank on which the writers were seated, so a fly was immediately

put over him and was accepted at the first offer. Earlier that day there

had been a large hatch of Dark Needles, and it was an imitation of that

insect which induced the rise. Alternately the writers threw over rising

fish with more or less success; but the professional, who persevered for

another half-hour without changing his flies, at last gave up in disgust.

For the time being at least he was beaten. Not that he did not know the

river or understand the habits of the trout—both were to him as an open

book—but simply because he was deficient in his knowledge of insect life.

This man probably knew some ten or a dozen good all-round flies which he

used the season through, but without due regard to the hatch of natural

insects.

Now put yourself in the professional’s position on that particular day,

only add to his knowledge that of insect life. On finding your flies

rejected, you would have picked from off the water, and examined, the

natural insects which were floating down; then, immediately realizing

what was amiss, you would have substituted an imitation of the taking

fly for one on your cast. Success would have followed failure, and a

light-hearted angler would have tramped homewards at sunset with a creel

the heavier for his practical knowledge.

From the foregoing it will be gathered that the novice should make it his

first duty to study on every possible occasion the insect life of the

river he is going to fish, and not merely rely upon the tackle dealer

or professional to supply his deficiency in this, or indeed in other

matters. By this let it not be thought that the writers consider it

necessary to go deeply into the study of entomology, fascinating as that

study is; but if the greatest amount of pleasure is to be derived, and

incidentally a fair number of fish to be killed, it is essential that the

angler should arm himself with a good general knowledge of river insect

life.

A great deal in this direction can be learned by an occasional emptying

of a trout’s stomach into a glass of water, and an examination of the

_débris_ after they have been separated by a brisk stir round. It is

most instructive, and it shows how catholic fish are in their feeding.

It shows too, not infrequently, the reasons for a poor day’s sport, and

often gives a hint which may turn failure into success on some future

occasion.

Though a knowledge of insect life is highly important, it is equally

necessary to learn to adapt oneself to varying conditions.

This latter point may at the first glance appear unnecessarily

elementary, so much so as to seem hardly worth making, but speaking from

personal experience, the writers think that, probably on account of its

very obviousness, it often receives far less attention than it deserves.

How many anglers, after working the long winter through begin, as the

trout season draws near, to let their thoughts wander to some favourite

stream and live for days, aye, almost weeks, in anticipation of the

opening day? They conjure up in their minds all the details that have

gone to make up some red-letter day in the past, the whole scene comes

up as fresh as ever, and memory, ever willing, gives them a most vivid

picture of the pool in which the fish of the season put up his last

gallant struggle. They recall those exciting moments when the strength

of the cast was taxed to its utmost as the fish wildly endeavoured to

reach the roots of an overhanging tree, and the joyful feeling of power

that crept over them when at last the lusty trout, having somewhat spent

himself, allowed them to regain a foot or two of line. Then came that

last mad rush when the captive perceived the net.

These memories are happy indeed, though often enough they lead one

astray, as, when the eve of the opening day arrives, one has probably

definitely decided to begin operations at the exact pool that was the

scene of one’s former success. Is this adapting oneself to circumstances?

It can hardly be so, and yet probably very few can say that they have

never fallen a victim to such foolishness.

The wise man waits until the morrow, when he can see how the wind strikes

his favourite stream or reach, whether the water is too high or too low,

and whether the sport that it normally might be expected to yield is

going to be adversely affected by any other condition. If so, even though

disappointed, he will find a more suitable place at which to begin and

no doubt at the end of the day his creel will reveal the reward of his

adaptability to circumstance.

The consideration of adaptability to circumstance naturally brings one

to a classification and subsequent subdivision of the methods of fly

fishing, which methods, judiciously and intelligently combined, make for

the true road to success.

Fly fishing may be practised in two principal ways, with the wet fly and

with the dry fly.

In the former, as the name implies, the flies are fished slightly

submerged; and three or sometimes four flies may be used on the cast.

They are placed some 20 inches or so apart, but varied as to distance

according to the state of the river, greater distance between them being

necessary, and fewer flies being used, in low clear water. In dry-fly

fishing, as perhaps it is unnecessary to state, only one fly is used, and

it is made to float by being whipped through the air after each cast,

so as to shake off any globules of water that may be attached to the

feathers, a process which is generally assisted by the fly being lightly

touched with oil before use.

Before going further it is as well to say a few words regarding the rod

and tackle. The length of rod the writers find most useful is 10 ft. 6

ins., and, if it is to be used for wet-fly fishing exclusively, they

would unhesitatingly recommend a two-piece rod made of greenheart, or of

hickory for the butt, with greenheart top, not too whippy and not too

stiff. Such a rod is softer in the action and less tiring to the wrist

than one made of split cane. That is a matter well worth consideration

when one is whipping the stream for long periods at a stretch.

For dry-fly fishing however, and general use, and for almost unending

wear, a split-cane rod by one of the first-class makers will probably

best suit the requirements of the average man; only in selecting the rod,

of whatever pattern, great care should be devoted to getting one which,

with reel and line attached, will make a harmonious whole. If the rod

be a split cane, it should be rather more whippy than the average type

in use on Chalk streams. These points should be carefully attended to,

otherwise the beginner, after working for an hour or so, will find his

wrist growing tired, and he will then get into a slovenly way of casting,

which is easier to learn than to unlearn.

Regarding the reel, line and cast, we should recommend, if the reader is

buying his rod from a man of practical experience, that he leaves the

first two to the maker’s discretion. He will then no doubt get both reel

and line of suitable weight for the rod. The cast should be approximately

three yards, tapered, the last yard being of finest drawn gut for

ordinary waters, but a coarser cast may be used when fishing a full or

slightly coloured water. A good cast for ordinary waters can be made

of ten strands of gut, each strand either 12 or 14 inches in length and

tapered as follows:—First two strands of Quarter drawn, then two strands

of Half drawn, then three strands of 2x, and finally three strands of 4x.

WET-FLY FISHING.

It is with wet-fly fishing that it is proposed to deal first, as this

method is by far the more important on the majority of North Country

rivers, the dry fly being a useful auxiliary under conditions to be

detailed later.

Why, it may be asked, should the fish be more partial to the wet fly than

to the dry fly on Northern streams. The reason is not far to seek; for,

owing to the roughness and rapidity of such rivers, a large percentage

of insects, as they rise from the bed of the river preparatory to

hatching out, are carried many yards downstream before they reach the

surface of the water. Others, getting into rough water, find themselves

unequal to the effort of emerging from their nymphal case, or emerge with

wetted and helpless wings, while many flies, surviving these natural

difficulties, are carried down some rapid almost immediately after they

reach the perfect state, and get water-logged before ever they have the

opportunity of using their wings. Hence the trout become used to taking

much of their insect food in a submerged or partially submerged state.

Therefore so long as those streams remain as heretofore, the wet fly is

likely to continue to hold the premier position in the filling of a North

Countryman’s creel.

There are two methods of fishing the wet fly, upstream and downstream.

Follows an attempt to give a brief outline of how and when each method

may be used to the best advantage.

The use of the word “downstream” in this connection is, perhaps, somewhat

misleading, for it is not intended to refer to that method of fishing

in which the angler casts his flies across and downstream, allowing the

current to sweep them round to a point below him, in the same manner as

when fishing the salmon fly. To fish an imitation of a natural insect in

such a way as to make it resist the onward flow of the water in a most

unnatural manner, is, in the writers’ judgment, unsound, and they wish it

to be understood that, by “downstream,” they do not allude to this manner

of fishing.

The downstream method advocated might quite appropriately be termed

across-stream fishing, as the angler faces the bank towards which he

purposes fishing, casts across and slightly upstream, then allows the

flies to be carried without drag till they reach a point a few yards

below where they alighted upon the water. Wading downstream a yard or

more, he repeats the cast, until the whole stream has been worked in

this manner. The only reason for the term “downstream” being used in

connection with this class of fishing is that the angler himself works

down the river.

The next question for consideration is, when is downstream fishing

advisable? It may truly be answered, “Not often,” for its practice might

be confined to strong and full waters, to waters tinged with colour,

to cold Spring days before and after the hatch, to evening fishing in

such places as have the river flowing towards the sunset, and, lastly,

to occasions when a heavy downstream wind or the nature of the country

leaves the angler no choice.

The enthusiast frequently finds himself on the river bank on a Spring

morning long before the sun’s rays have warmed the air, or any sign of

insect life is visible. With experience he will find that at such times

the trout are not in the heavy rapid streams, but may be looked for in

steady flowing water.

A favourite place, which the writers would never pass by on such an

occasion, is formed when a stream some two feet deep flows gently along

the edge of a bank, and particularly if the bank be overhung, or other

natural causes make it a harbour or refuge for the stream’s inhabitants.

Let the novice who finds himself, cold Spring weather prevailing, at the

top of such a stream, cast in the manner described across, but slightly

upstream, towards such bank. As the flies are carried down, let him

vibrate the point of his rod slightly by an up and down motion in order

to make his flies appear as though they were struggling to reach the

surface of the water. Ten to one before the stream is fished out a sharp

pluck will be felt, but the beginner, unprepared, will in many cases

leave his fly in the fish or miss him altogether. The hooking of trout

under such conditions is difficult in the extreme, as frequently no rise

is seen; and it is only by perseverance, leading to appreciation of the

moment to strike, that he can hope to succeed.

To teach in theory the correct method and timing of the strike under such

conditions, is beyond the writers. The knowledge seems to come to the

persevering almost as a sixth sense. At times it is positively uncanny to

watch an “artist,” in his instinctive response to the rises of fish under

the conditions described, for they are totally invisible to the average

man.

Practice, coupled with intelligent reasoning out of the whys and

wherefores of success and failure, will do more to help the novice than

anything else. But, even with the rod in the hands of a past-master, this

method of downstream fishing will not always succeed, though the waiting

hour before the rise may often be well spent in giving these tactics a

trial.

As soon, however, as the first insects floating on the surface have been

noticed by the fish, the time has come to change methods and to fish

upstream.

Upstream fishing is far more difficult than downstream fishing, and the

initial efforts will prove disheartening. Rise after rise will be missed,

and the flies will be swept to the feet of the angler almost before he

has seen where they lit. It is nevertheless all important that the novice

should school himself in this branch of fly fishing beyond any other, as

upon it will depend his future success.

The education of the angler who has only mastered downstream fishing,

or even dry-fly fishing, is incomplete; and, though the dry-fly purist

may shrug his shoulders at the remark, it is not too much to say that,

if he were transferred from the pellucid waters of the Chalk stream to

some rapid broken river of the North, and were to endeavour to fish the

wet fly, it would be some considerable time before he achieved any great

success. Whereas the man who has once thoroughly mastered the art of

fishing the wet fly _upstream_ would be able quickly to adapt himself to

the conditions and surroundings of the home of the dry fly.

Scoffers have often termed wet-fly fishing in general the “chuck and

chance it” method, but those who thus described it can never have seen

an expert at work fishing upstream. There is no such thing as “chuck

and chance it” in the way he throws his flies. Every cast is made to a

definite point, not necessarily to a rising fish, as in dry-fly fishing,

but successively to each of the many little runs, eddies, channels, and

slack waters behind boulders, which his experience teaches are likely

to hold feeding fish. It is just the experience gained by such definite

fishing that the dry-fly purist who throws to none but feeding fish would

lack, if he overcame his prejudices and essayed to throw the wet fly on

Northern waters.

The obvious natural law which causes fish to lie head upstream should

convince the reader that no undue stress has been laid upon the

importance of fishing upstream, and that that method should be rigidly

adhered to on all occasions, except those previously mentioned.

That trout have exceptionally keen eyesight, no one who has ever

walked along the banks of a trout stream will deny. How then can the

least thoughtful expect to creel decent fish with the river in normal

condition, if he stands with the fish below him, or, for that matter,

stands anywhere within their very wide range of vision, a range so wide

that, if a circle be described with the head of a trout for the centre,

only about one-sixth of the circumference of such a circle, and that

immediately behind, would appear to be outside the range of vision of the

fish?

From these well-known facts it will be obvious, even to the uninitiated,

that the best approach for the angler bent on capturing trout in clear

water is from behind. Yet, astonishing as it may seem (and for the

simple reason that it is the easier way), many men—we might almost say

the majority of men—invariably fish their flies across and downstream,

letting the flies sweep right round until they are directly below, where

they are often allowed to dangle in the water at the end of a taut line.

To fish downstream in this manner requires no particular skill, as the

stream does most of the work; and, while the great majority of fish risen

are merely pricked and lost, those caught are below the average of size

for the river fished. If the beginner is having a bad day and everything

is going wrong, if he grows tired with his efforts to fish upstream and

is tempted to resort to this method, rather than do so, let him knock

off for a while and smoke a pipe, and then return, with renewed hope and

vigour, to his upstream fishing, determined to master it.

Now it frequently happens that the angler wading upstream gets almost up

to, or at any rate within two or three yards of a fish, before ever his

presence is noticed. There is therefore in general little necessity to

use a long line when fishing upstream, yet it is often done.

Frequently anglers are met who say that they cannot fish upstream,

urging, by way of excuse, that they have difficulty in seeing fish rise,

which causes late striking, the fish being missed entirely, or, at the

most, only turned over. Of course it is difficult to see a rise, or

to strike a fish, in a rapid stream if a long line is used, and in the

majority of these cases the reason for failure is to be found in the use

of too long a line.

Therefore the novice who is bent on mastering fly-fishing upstream can

almost dismiss from his mind _the first part_ of the “far off and fine”

theory. In practice it will be found that, for fishing strong flowing

streams, a line (including the cast) but little longer than the rod is

ample; while for fishing the more gently flowing shallow water at the

edges of such streams, another yard or two of line will be necessary to

assist the angler in keeping out of sight. The angler must be ruled by

circumstances, always bearing in mind the fact that the most practical

length of line to use is the shortest on which a trout may be killed.

Once this fact has been fully appreciated and carried into practice, many

of the supposed difficulties of upstream fishing will vanish entirely,

leaving the novice free to tackle other problems.

Arriving at a likely stretch of water, and full of excitement on noticing

a fish rise at the tail of the main stream, the beginner will often wade

straight out to a point below the fish and then cast over him. There is

always a temptation, even to the expert, to go for a rising fish, but

under such circumstances, if the angler be wise, he will take a careful

survey before wading out, and will note the character of the water within

casting distance of the edge.

The experienced angler will do this instinctively, and will make his

first cast to the sharp run at the edge of the bank. His second will be

made slightly more across; and, after he has released another foot or two

of line, his flies at the third throw will search the slack water behind

the rock. Here the cast will be repeated two or three times in rapid

succession, the flies not being allowed to remain in the water more than

a moment, lest the current pick up the line and cause a drag.

The fear of drag is ever present, but drag may be avoided in many cases,

if care is exercised in regulating the speed at which the rod point

is raised as the flies are swept down by the current. When the flies

have been thrown to a quieter bit of water and there is a danger of the

current picking up the line, the moment of drag can often be postponed

if the cast finishes in a wavy line on the water, as the current has to

pickup the slack before the drag takes effect on the flies. To cast thus

is a feat not difficult of achievement for many of the fraternity.

Another throw is now made, then another, each rather more across stream,

and then, as a result of the next cast, the flies are hustled rapidly

down a race between two boulders. Here, as in all swift-flowing water, it

is necessary to make several casts before the angler can be sure that his

flies have thoroughly searched the run; and it is most important to keep

in mind that the casts of a past master at upstream fly fishing follow

quickly one after another.

[Illustration: _Headwaters of the Aire_

_Photo by N. N. Lee_]

Wading now a few yards across stream, the angler continues this system of

casting until he eventually reaches a point from which he can assail the

trout that was noticed rising at the tail of the main stream. A few more

steps then bring him to the far bank.

To fish a stream or length of river systematically, crossing and

recrossing, each time a few yards higher up, until the whole has been

thoroughly covered, takes time; but it is far better that the angler’s

flies should be on the water, searching every spot fit to hold a fish,

than waving in the air while he moves rapidly on from stream to stream.

Particularly is this the case in Spring when the rise comes on late and

ends early, and also on a Summer’s evening when the water seems literally

alive with fish, so madly do they rise, but for all too brief a spell.

Time is of all importance on such occasions, and here it is that the

angler who fishes methodically and with intelligence scores so heavily

as compared with the rod who spends half his time in walking from stream

to stream, and the other half in fishing them in a mechanical sort of

way. So many unsuccessful fishermen only fish the larger streams of a

river (and usually downstream), entirely ignoring the fact that, while

such streams afford a harbour for a great number of fish, they are often

deserted in favour of odd corners and favourite “lies” directly the

“rise” begins.

The thoughtful fisherman studies the water, its pools, currents and

eddies, and all those other details, the meaning of which under varying

conditions he has learned to read, and he is always alive to gather some

new hint. He brings to his aid the wisdom gained by past experiences,

successes and failures, and a knowledge of the habitat of the trout which

has been the reward of keen observation and a reasoning mind.

He will tell you that in early Spring the trout, having hardly recovered

their energy after spawning, are not to be found in the heavy rapids,

but may be looked for at the tail ends of streams and in gently flowing

water; that, as the weeks go by, and as the sun’s rays warm the water,

insect life becomes more plentiful, and that the trout, once more lusty

and strong with the abundant supply of food, spread themselves over the

river, into rapid streams and all those places into which steady supplies

are concentrated; and further, that during the heat of Summer they will

be located in the thinnest of water, at the very edges of streams, pools

and eddies, where they lie ever ready to dart away at the least suspicion

of danger.

Such an angler realizes the necessity of a good knowledge of insect life,

watercraft and the habitat of the trout, and becomes as intimate with

each as an artist is with his colours. And as blue and yellow combined

will make a green, so surely will the man who thoroughly acquires such

knowledge be a long way towards being numbered amongst the elect.

A goodly dish of trout hardly come by is a great satisfaction to a man

who has to fit in his fishing days when he can, but perhaps the greatest

pleasure to the true disciple of Walton is the capture, after many

failures and disappointments and under difficult conditions, of some wily

old trout whose education, by the constant bombardment of his stronghold,

has been brought to a high degree of finish. What memories of his capture

crowd the mind when some chance word stirs the chords! Perhaps he came

from out a moorland stream when the snell wind flung back the spray from

every sounding fall, or may be he stubbornly gave up his virile life on

some sun-steeped day when first the daffodils proclaimed that laggard

Spring had come to a waking country side. Whatever the memory, it is

wholly delightful.

The charm of fly fishing is never ending and a great part lies in the

infinite field for experiment open to him who runs. Every day some new

feature is revealed; and, even in this twentieth century, he who will

leave the beaten track, bent on exploration, will always discover new

ground for investigation. The truth of this was brought home to one of

the writers most forcibly when on a fishing expedition one July some

years ago.

Rain on the previous day had left the river slightly coloured, and in

magnificent condition, and as the sun was some little way above, though

nearing the horizon, he, with the lightest heart and full of hope,

approached a steady flowing reach where the banks were here and there

fringed with clumps of willows.

A fish rose well out in the stream, then another, and another; and as

the tackle had been fitted up before leaving the farm-house, even to

the putting on of a cast of flies, it was not long before those fish,

which were apparently seizing every fly that passed over them, were

covered again and again. All to no purpose, for the trout proved very

discriminating, and at last, when a fish half rose without breaking the

surface of the water, a change of fly was decided on.

Hovering round the willows, dancing to and fro in the air, were hundreds

of insects, which on examination proved to be Light and Dark Silverhorns.

Five minutes had barely elapsed when, with a Light Silverhorns to replace

his point fly and a Dark one as first dropper, the angler was again

assailing his fish; but he could get no more satisfactory response than a

bulge or two. Then the position of these two flies was reversed, a step

which often pays, but it did not on that occasion.

The case was becoming desperate, for the rise would soon be over. So with

some reluctance he left the rising fish and waded into the stream and put

his flies into a likely looking eddy below an overhanging willow bush

growing on the far bank. Almost immediately a fish was battling for dear

life, but without avail; and soon five more, all coming from under the

bank, quickly joined him in the creel.

As the last of these fish was being drawn over the net, two local anglers

appeared on the scene. Neither had killed a fish, so a few precious

moments were taken up in wading out and giving each one or two of the

killing fly.

When the rise was over the angler counted eight brace of nice sizable

fish, all but two being killed on the Silverhorns, the exceptions

having fallen to the Brown Owl, which was probably taken for the Light

Silverhorns. All came from under the willows and banks on a reach no more

than fifty yards in length, but strange to say, the local men finished up

without a fish to show between them.

Later on, when considering the events of the evening between the sheets,

it occurred to the successful one, that the killing fly of the evening

was a killing fly only so long as it was fished close to the banks near

the willows, and in those places over which hovered the natural fly. The

locals had evidently fished the fly out in mid-stream; hence their clean

creels.

The following day was a Day of Rest, and as this idea was after all but

surmise, nothing was said to the two local fishermen, but the results of

the next evening’s fishing were awaited with considerable interest.

Conditions on the Monday proved to be very similar to those prevailing

on the Saturday, and the results of the day justified the surmise,

that the fish under the willows were feeding on such insects as hovered

above them, every now and then to touch the water, while those out in

mid-stream had no Silverhorns available and so confined their attention

to the spent spinners, smuts and other flies, which were brought to them

by the current.

If the solution of the problem that presented itself on that first

evening be correct, then the killing power of a fly is often dependent

on its being fished with due regard to the haunts of the natural insect

it is supposed to imitate. What a field is here for investigation, and

yet the matter is one upon which no hard and fast rules can be made.

Prevailing conditions must be studied carefully. A cross-wind might

obviously entirely alter the local conditions, and one would not look in

such circumstances for flies in their usual haunts. On windy days the

observant angler would probably find that the menu of the fish on the

side from which the wind was blowing would include many Diptera or other

land-bred insects, while the fish on the lee shore, would most likely be

feeding principally on such insects of aquatic origin as happened to be

hatching out at the time.

The foregoing merely serves to illustrate a few of the many

considerations involved in this absorbing sport; and in following up

these problems many side issues of equal importance will be opened up.

If the beginner is dogged by disappointment and failure (and who can

feel the utter bitterness of disappointment more than a fisherman?), let

him be advised to take heart of grace and not to blame the lowness of

the water, the brightness of the day, thunder or any of the elements,

for his lack of sport, but to say to himself, “What have I left undone

that should have been done? Where have I failed?” For trout, like human

beings, take their daily bread; and it is up to the angler to find out

when and where and in what shape. If the beginner will therefore reason

out the causes of failure instead of making excuses for it, he will be

more likely then and on future occasions to remedy his mistakes and to

know the satisfaction of killing fish on a really difficult day.

DRY-FLY FISHING.

Next to be considered are the dry fly and its use on the North Country

Rivers; but the novice is strongly urged, before ever he seeks to master

this branch of angling, to get a good grip of the wet-fly method.

From the term “North Country Rivers” are naturally excluded such rivers

as the Costa, which is probably the nearest approach in the North to the

Chalk streams of Hampshire, the home of the dry fly. On that particular

river the dry fly would probably on most occasions take the premier

position, whereas on the rougher and more rapid streams, such as the

Wharfe, Ribble, Lune, etc., the position is reversed.

Not many years ago one very seldom came across anyone further North than

Derbyshire fishing the dry fly, but slowly and surely has the method

become more and more popular; for it is only by the judicious combination

of the two methods of fly fishing that the best results and the greatest

pleasure can, in the judgment of the writers, be obtained. But _chacun

à son goût_, and far be it from them to legislate for any sportsmen who

wish or agree to keep their waters exclusively for any one method of

fishing.

Dry-fly fishing, as practised in the South, differs slightly from the

method here advocated for the rougher streams above-mentioned, inasmuch

as the purist of the South will not throw a fly to any but a rising fish,

even though he wait an hour or more before locating one, while the North

Country angler not only throws to the rise, but also to such places as

are likely to hold feeding fish.

When a specially strong hatch of duns takes place on Northern rivers and

the fish line up to suck in the insects as they hurry downstream, sails

spread to the breeze, it will pay the angler to try the floater. Again,

between streams on rapid rivers one often comes upon a long stretch of

quiet steady flowing water ideal for the dry fly. By applying themselves

to such a stretch with the methods of their friends of the South the

writers have more than once retrieved a bad day. Quiet eddies too may

frequently be fished with success by this method, and every river has

some places, and is subject to some moods, in which the dry fly scores

over the wet.

The first experience of one of the writers in dry-fly fishing was years

ago. He had fished for grayling till noon on a bright frosty October

day with indifferent success, when, on reaching a long stream with the

current under the far bank, he noticed several fish rising at the tail.

In between himself and the fish was a wide stretch of water some twelve

or eighteen inches in depth, and the fish were out of reach, as the

angler was not wearing waders.

Now the occasional fish he had managed to reach during the course of the

morning absolutely refused the wet fly.

At the moment another fisherman appeared from upstream and, wading out,

immediately caught several nice fish, to the no small envy of him on the

bank. Before passing on the successful angler vouchsafed the remark “dry

fly,” and gave the writer in question the “oil tip” in theory and in

practice.

Off came boots and stockings, and, with the shallow water safely waded,

the rising grayling were within casting distance. So long as the fly—a

Red Tag—could be kept dry, so long did the fish rise at it, but they

would not look at it when water-logged. Between whiles the angler came

to shore to stamp a bit of feeling into his legs, for the water was icy

cold; but he enjoyed himself hugely and got quite a decent bag, besides

adding greatly to the scope of his accomplishment in the gentle art.

The writers have seen the dry fly score heavily during the rise of Iron

Blue Duns, and they remember one occasion when that most dainty and

beautiful Ephemera was sailing down in numbers, and when a feathered

imitation accounted for six brace of fish from a weed-grown reach of

steady flowing water.

A word here must be said with regard to the timing of the strike when

using the dry fly, for the man who is used to wet-fly fishing will

probably strike too quickly and at the most only prick his fish. In the

former method, before attempting to drive home the steel, the fish should

be allowed to turn with the fly in his mouth. In wet-fly fishing the fish

has often turned before the rise becomes apparent.

Many occasions could be mentioned on which the dry fly has given the

writers most pretty fishing. Once on a Cleveland stream, slow flowing and

edged with most luxuriant vegetation, the wet fly, cast over rise after

rise, was totally ignored, but a change to a floating Female Black Gnat

at once worked wonders. Had it not been for the innumerable derelict

branches and water weeds in which the cast was time after time tied up,

the creel would have been heavy. But the enjoyment was intense that

glorious June evening.

Quite sharp streams too will often fish well with the dry fly in the long

evenings, and on one occasion it was again the Female Black Gnat which

accounted for some difficult Wharfe trout that refused all wet flies,

however presented. It is indeed during the evening rise that the dry fly

will be found most generally useful on Northern streams.

That fickle evening rise that so many anglers impatiently wait for all

day, only to return home beaten and disappointed at dark! Not that the

fish do not rise, for at times the water literally boils with them, but

their discrimination is truly wonderful. How many an angler on occasions

during all that mad rise has never killed a fish, or not until the sun

had dropped well behind the horizon and dusk was upon him. Then perhaps

he has creeled four or five before the rise ceased, but has returned home

dissatisfied, realizing that he had been thoroughly beaten, and that it

was the failing light, and not his skill, knowledge or ingenuity, that

saved him from a blank.

An autopsy will often reveal on such occasions spinners, gnats and sedge

flies; and yet the most lightly and carefully made imitations, however

deftly thrown, utterly fail as wet flies to attract the fish.

At times like these a Black Gnat, Ginger and Red Spinners No. 35 and No.

36, fished dry, and later, as the sun drops behind the horizon, a Silver

Sedge may be recommended.

The angler should begin at the tail end of the stream and work gradually

up, placing his fly over every rise and in all such places as are likely

to hold feeding fish.

On occasions when all else fails, a trial may be given to a fancy fly,

such as the Pink Wickham or Coachman. With such patterns during that most

tantalising of rises the writers have sometimes retrieved their fortunes.

Then, as dusk comes on and the dry fly becomes difficult to see, let the

angler quickly change to a cast of wet flies, the flies dressed a size

larger than those usually used during the day, and before the rise is

over his creel may be the heavier for the change.

The dry fly has done yeoman service on some of those impossible days when

fish streak away like lightning directly the cast falls on the water.

By much stalking and careful fishing of out-of-the-way places and odd

corners, the writers have sometimes finished with a brace or two which

have given great satisfaction.

It is very comical to see the evident surprise of a fish which is taken

in by a dry fly when he is quietly feeding in the shallows. Before he

moves off for the stream he often seems to completely lose his head,

bouncing about half in and half out of the water, and creating no end

of a splash. On one occasion within the writers’ experience under such

circumstances a trout landed himself high and dry on the shingle where

he broke the hold, and, continuing his antics, regained the water. Long

ere this he must have made room for his descendants, as agile, let it be

hoped, as himself.

How inordinately fond trout must be of the “fisherman’s curse”—a term

which covers, no doubt, several varieties of fly—for it will be found to

have occurred in the trout’s menu with unfailing regularity throughout

the summer and autumn. It almost always is the fly which the trout pick

off the surface of the water when they rise in the quiet flats the

livelong day, days which, most anglers will agree, are usually the most

difficult. Sometimes something may be done with Ginger or Red Spinners,

wet or dry, under such conditions, when imitations of the “curses,”

probably on account of their size, fail to attract.

The Ginger and Red Spinners described have only by degrees worked their

way into the inner circle of the writers’ flies. Experience has proved

their usefulness, for they will often be taken when all else fails. These

dry patterns have killed fish under particularly difficult and hopeless

conditions; and their use is recommended with the greatest confidence.

Such then is a brief outline of the occasions on which the dry fly has

been found to be of most use to the North Countryman; but no hard and

fast rules can be made, for the angler’s discernment must play the

greater part in regulating his actions, and the foregoing hints are

merely given as some small guide to the beginner. But let all who try the

dry fly beware of drag; it will ruin the chances of the most artistic

cast.

Anyone with designs on dry-fly fishing on Northern streams may well

confine himself to a few of Mr. Halford’s patterns, say the Olive Dun,

Dark Olive Dun, Iron Blue Dun, and Black Gnat, with the addition of the

Ginger and Red Spinners, Nos. 35 and 36, the Red Quill, and the Silver

Sedge, and a fancy pattern or two, such as the Coachman and Pink Wickham,

for use on occasions described above.

A great debt of gratitude is due to those who introduced the dry fly and

developed its use so whole-heartedly, for there is a charm about dry-fly

fishing which is distinctive, and a fascination that almost defies

description in watching a neatly cocked artificial fly approach the

rings made by a rising trout. A moment of suspense, intense excitement,

followed by joy supreme when a timely strike is rewarded by a tightened

line. So, apart from its being an asset in the filling of the creel,

the dry fly increases the pleasures of the gentle craft to a very great

extent, a craft as unique in its scope and variety as it is intriguing in

its difficulties. The whole setting of the craft enhances its enchantment

and give it a hold upon its followers, powerful as that of friendship,

converting them into ardent devotees for life. Whether one follows its

calling in the flower-starred water meadows of the South, or explores

the rivers of the “stone-ribbed North,” the peace and beauty of the

surroundings, far from the noisy crowd, add a charm which every good

fisherman knows how to be thankful for.

[Illustration: _Broken Water_

_Photo by Mr F. Creedy_]

How pleasant is the time of the after-luncheon pipe, with the dipper

curtseying from the stones in mid-stream. May be the desolate call of

the curlew floats down from the fells, and the grey dale village, with

its quaint architecture, speaks of times long past, of times when the

Borderers filed down the valley, perhaps to fall upon a party of Monks

from the rich Abbey of Fountains. Imagination suggests to the ear the

savage shout of exultation of the assailants and the screams of the

stricken, when a widening circle in the stream brings one back to present

day realities in a second.

Such is a part of the angler’s day, which, lingering in the mind,

inspires him through the long wintry months to look forward to the time

when God’s earth shall be fresh and green again, and the wild thyme be

fragrant on the banks of many a North Country stream.

Great men and small alike are held by the wonderful fascination of the

sport, which gives such joy, affords such relaxation to the mind, and

is so free from all taint of brutality. And though the actual angling

requires the utmost concentration of mind and thought, yet after all, it

has truly been described as “The Contemplative Man’s Recreation.”

Brook and river trouting · 第 2 / 5 章