Formerly, before Louis XIV. admitted them to the Louvre, the Guild of

Painters and Sculptors held its meetings in the Rue Trainée, and its

_fêtes_ and funeral masses in the chapel of S. André in S. Eustache; in

consequence of which the king, to do honour to the Academy, allowed its

rector, Antoine Coysevox, to add the royal lily to his arms, and to

place them in this chapel, thus honouring Coysevox at the same time as

his fellow sculptors and painters. The guild was founded by Lebrun, and

held its meetings at the Sieur Martin de Charmois' house. This Seigneur

de Lauré was secretary to Marshal Schomberg; and full of zeal for art

and artists, was the author of the scheme of a guild. Signed by Lebrun,

Sarazin, Perrier, Bourdon, de la Hire Corneille, Juste d'Egmont,

Vanolstat, Hause, de Guernier, Errard, Van-Mol, Guillier, and Eustace

Lesueur, the petition was presented to the king, and supported by

chancellor Séguier and de la Veillière, it obtained the royal assent.

Like our later foundation, the Academy made several moves before it was

finally settled. First in Charmois' house, it migrated to the Hôtel

Clisson, Rue des Deux-Boules, where it held its meetings until the

squabbles of the rival artists subsided, and accommodation was found for

the members at the Louvre. Most appropriately, the decoration of this

chapel was given in 1850 to Isidore Pils, one of the great painters of

the latter part of this century, so well known by his _Battle of the

Alma_, the _Mort d'une Soeur de Charité_, and _La Prière à l'Hospice_.

The subjects are from the life and death of the titular saint, Andrew;

on one side, his crucifixion upon the transverse cross which bears his

name; upon the other, Angels bearing him to heaven. In the latter, a

more delicious little group of children, _soi-disant_ Angels, has rarely

been painted, even by that master of chubby and graceful babies,

Prud'hon. Pils, says M. l'abbé Koeneg[69] loved children, and he

certainly painted them as none but a lover of childhood could have done.

The chapel Richelieu was founded by the great cardinal, and is the

burial place of the Vrillière family, whose hotel is now the Banque de

France. The door close by is called the _Porte de la Miséricorde_ by

reason of its paintings, which represent the _Seven Works of Mercy_.

They are by M. Biennourry.

The Chapelle des Catéchismes is a very ancient foundation, having been

erected in the old church by Louis d'Orléans, the brother of Charles

VI., in honour of S. Michael. Two centuries later, the Orléans family

sold it to Président Forget, and a chapel was built out of it to serve,

first as a sacristy, and then as a room for confraternities to hold

their meetings in. The staircase is very elegant, with its handsome

wrought-iron _grille_ and balustrade of the time of Louis XVI. The

chapel seems to be used now as a boys' vestry, and the effect of the

acolytes in their red cassocks and white albs passing up or down this

beautiful flight of steps is picturesque in the extreme. S. Eustache is

one of the few churches in Paris which has not adopted the Roman use as

regards the dress of the acolytes, who still wear the long alb plaited

or trimmed with lace, and the sash, red, white, or pale blue, according

to the season. Years ago, before the Parisian rite was superseded by the

Roman, there were many little differences in the ritual; to wit, the two

precentors sitting near the chancel _grille_, vested in copes, and at

certain times during mass marching up and down the choir. Then again, on

great festivals, six men holding censers stood in a row, and throwing

them up, knelt upon one knee to catch them. The effect of this during

Benediction was grand in the extreme; the Roman practice of two boys

gently swinging the censers bearing no comparison to the Parisian. The

Lady chapel, known as Notre-Dame de Bon-Secours, served in the 17th

century as the assembling place of various charitable societies, and

notably of the Société de Bons-Secours, which was so much patronised by

the _noblesse_ and the rich tradespeople. The chapel is in the same

style as the side ones, and is a mass of colour, the decorations being

by M. Dénuel. The frescoes were originally undertaken by Ary Scheffer,

who, perhaps fortunately for posterity, was so long working out his

subject that he gave the matter up, Couture taking his place. But great

artist as he was, Couture was hardly the man to decorate a church; his

work and his sympathies were so eminently Classic in style, that it is

difficult to feel that his paintings illustrate pages of Gospel history

and legendary lore. There is no more religious sentiment in Couture's

work than in the Eclectic decadence of Italy, or the 18th century French

school. Many persons object to our latest group of religious painters;

but the feeling expressed in the pictures of M. Lhermitte, of

Bastien-Lepage, of Mr. C. Pierce, of M. Dagnan-Bouveret, and even in M.

Béraud's _Crucifixion_, to say nothing of Herr Uhde's work, is far more

religious than in many, one might almost say, in most of the frescoes

and pictures by modern artists in the various churches. Sentimentality

is not religious sentiment, and cast-up eyes do not necessarily express

devotion. Again, the light is so bad in this chapel that it is very

difficult to judge of Couture's work, even from the æsthetic point of

view; and therefore we cannot think this picture equal to the grand

_Romains de la Décadence_ in the Louvre. The altar is a handsome

specimen of the reign of Louis XIII., but the statue which surmounts

it, by Pigalle, has the usual sentimental character of 18th century

sculpture. A _plaque_ informs the faithful that it was blessed by Pius

VII. in 1804; but, unfortunately, a pope's blessing will not turn a

piece of marble into a fine work of art.

The chapel of S. Louis de Gonzague was the property of the Colbert

family, and contains the tomb of the great minister. The monument was

executed from a design by Lebrun, and, although of the usual type of

that period, it is not without a certain grandeur. A black marble

sarcophagus supports the kneeling figure of Colbert, arrayed in the

robes of the order of the Saint-Esprit. The hands, joined in prayer, are

exquisitely modelled. The expression of the face is fine, and the flow

of the draperies is well executed. At the foot of the monument are

figures of Religion by Tubi and Abundance by Coysevox; the latter a good

example of the sculptor's style. This was one of the monuments saved

from the Vandal mob in 1792, by Lenoir, who marched it off to the museum

of the Petits-Augustins, where it remained until 1801, when it was

returned to S. Eustache.

More relics are to be seen in the next chapel, those of S. Pierre

l'Exorciste, a saint who suffered in the neighbourhood of Rome, having

obligingly dug his own grave previously to being beheaded. The

authenticity of the relics are vouched for by the sign manual of

Cardinal Caprara. One requires faith to believe in the authenticity of

these, or any other relics; not that one doubts their preservation by

loving hands after the martyrdoms, but there is a great gulf of time

which is not easily bridged over. Take, for instance, the relic of the

True Cross kept at Notre-Dame. It is not at all improbable that the

cross might have been preserved by the friends of Our Lord; and the same

remark applies to many of the other relics with which S. Louis and

others adorned the Sainte-Chapelle--the Spear, the Handcuffs, the Crown

of Thorns, even the linen stained by the precious blood. That the

Apostles, or S. Joseph of Arimathea, or Nicodemus, or S. Mary and her

sister Martha, would have done their best to gain possession of these

relics of their dear Master, is not only possible, but probable. We are

all relic-mongers at heart; our forefathers gathered together the

remains of saints and martyrs; we ourselves keep locks and curls of

hair, babies' teeth, bits of clothing, rings, and photographs. Where is

the difference? If the lost first-born's only tooth is precious to its

mother, why should not S. Holocaustus' toe-nail be equally so to those

who live in the Saint's parish or commune? We have Charles I.'s hair,

and Queen Elizabeth's stockings; and there is no reason why a thousand

years hence they should not still be in their cases. But if a great

upheavement took place, such as the siege of Jerusalem, or the first

French Revolution, the saving of such relics would be difficult,

although not by any means impossible. Take the finding of the True Cross

by S. Helena early in the 4th century. If this be true, it is by no

means impossible that it was preserved up to the time of S. Louis. Nor

is it impossible that someone connected with the church of S. Denis

should have secreted the relic before the desecration of the tombs in

1793. Rumours precede acts; and having a valuable relic, why not hide it

away when dangers lurk in the distance? But if so, why did not this

person preserve the vessels in which the relics were kept? Why not have

buried all those costly chalices, crosses and reliquaries? Why have left

them to be seized upon by profane hands and melted up, if there were

time to save their contents? But the chief difficulty is to account

reasonably for the gap between the Crucifixion and the finding of the

Cross; and it requires such a long bridge of faith to traverse this

space of three hundred years that one feels reluctantly obliged to take

the "Invention" of the Cross in its most literal sense.

The arms over the chapel of the Sainte-Madeleine are those of France

_barré_, commemorating the foundation (in the old church) by Charles,

Comte de Valois, duc d'Angoulême, a natural son of Charles IX., that

most excellent Christian king and zealous son of the Church, who

persecuted and slaughtered heretics for the good of their souls, thereby

converting them (in the next world) from the error of their ways, and so

covering his own multitudinous sins and wickednesses. There is a

handsome confessional of carved wood, period Louis XV., in this chapel;

and in the next, the relics of S. Vincent de Paul are enclosed in a fine

Louis XIV. _châsse_. Lest any reader doubts the correctness of my

translation, let me give the list of these relics in the original. "Les

reliques de St. Vincent de Paul se composent d'une image teinte du sang

du saint prêtre retrouvée légèrement coagulé quand on a ouvert son

tombeau, de deux médailles formées de sa chair et de ses os mis en pâte,

d'une parcelle de sa chair, de fragments de son suaire, de la soutane

qu'il portait de son vivant, de la soutane dont il a été retrouvé vêtu

dans sa bière, enfin d'un morceau de cette bière. Le tout est muni du

cachet de la Mission et accompagné de quatres authentiques signés par

MM. les supérieurs de Saint-Lazare." This and the S. Madeleine are the

oldest of the chapels, and are both architecturally fine, with

wrought-iron _grilles_ of elegant and cunning workmanship. The paintings

(1634), attributed to Simon Vouët or his Italian pupils, represent

scenes in the life of S. Anne, to whom the chapel was originally

dedicated by Anne de Monsigot, dame de Bourlon, who may be seen humbly

sitting upon the stairs of the temple, with her two children standing by

her side; while above, the high priest Zachariah is receiving the

Blessed Virgin, who is presented by her mother and father. Very

beautiful are the Angels bearing the instruments of the Passion, which

are painted upon the eight compartments of the ceiling.

The founder of the chapel of S. Geneviève was one Jehan Brice, a

merchant, whose desire that it should be richly decorated was carried

out by the widow, Guillemette de l'Arche, in 1546, who is said to have

been the heroine of a tale, which has been made familiar to us through

the Italian opera of _La Gazza Ladra_. It appears that an old MS. in the

possession of M. Boblet gives the list of foundation masses in the

parish, and amongst them is one entitled _La Pie Voleuse_, which was

said daily for the poor servant unjustly accused of stealing the spoon,

found later on in the roof of the church. But the unwonted hour fixed

for the mass, 4 a.m., and the name thereof, seem rather to point to the

magpie than to the maid. May not the mass have been for the thief rather

than for the innocent damsel? And was it not made thus early to assure

the attendance of all the feathered tribes (who are wont to rise

betimes), and to be unto them at once a warning and a duty paid to their

cousin-german, the mean and wicked magpie? A _Tobias and the Angel_, by

Santi di Tito, belonging originally to Louis XV., and ascribed to Andrea

del Sarto, is of a certain interest. The frescoes, taken from the life

of S. Louis in the chapel bearing his name, are amongst the best in the

church. M. Barrias has thrown much grandeur into his subject, _S. Louis

carrying the Crown of Thorns to the Sainte-Chapelle_; but no one has so

thoroughly depicted the ascetic beauty of the King, his true piety and

unflinching faith, as M. Olivier-Merson in the wall-paintings of the

corridor of the Cour de Cassation, in the Palais de Justice. In all the

works of the latter painter the truest religious sentiment is invariably

to be found; and if he errs upon the side of ugliness, is it not an

infinitely smaller fault than the sentimental upturned eyes and radiant

beauty of the German religious painters of the Cornelius and Hesse

schools?

The tribune over the sacristy door was put up by the Duchesse d'Orléans,

Adélaïde, the mother of Louis Philippe, in 1778, that she might enjoy

privacy when she was present at the offices. It is a noble example of

the finished style of Louis XVI.

Amongst the treasures of S. Eustache are an ivory crucifix in the

sacristy: a bone of the patron Saint, from the cemetery of S. Priscilla,

given in 1660 by Pope Alexander VII. to Sieur Chauvin; a tooth, formerly

in the church of S. Jacques-l'Hôpital; and some bones of S. Eustache and

his wife and children, said to have been formerly amongst the treasures

of S. Denis; but I find no record of them in Dom Millet. The frescoes in

the chapel of the patron Saint were painted by M. le Hénaff, in

imitation of those found in the catacombs of Rome, the painter having

copied the incorrect drawing as well as the fervent feeling of the early

painters.

One or two more pictures by Vouët may be seen; and in the chapel of the

Redemption are the frescoes of M. Glaize, one of the few painters who

seems to have understood the spirit in which a church should be

decorated.

[Illustration: L'ADORATION PERPÉTUELLE AT SAINT-EUSTACHE.]

S. Eustache was a royal parish up to the great crash at the end of the

last century; its domain extended from the Chaussée des Gaillons to the

Rue S. Denis, and being in the centre of the great world, it was very

fashionable. Hard by were the royal palaces, and the new and "magnifique

bastiment de l'hostel royal dit des Tuileries lez Paris, pour ce qu'il y

avoit anciennement une tuilerie audict lieu," the _chef-d'oeuvre_ of

Philibert Delorme, built by order of Catherine de' Medici to outrival

the Château d'Anet, erected by the same great artist for the irregular

queen, the lovely Diane. Not far from the Place Royale, and in the

centre of a nest of hotels belonging to great and noble personages, S.

Eustache became the praying-place of the living and the burial-place of

the defunct notabilities. The great ministers of Henri III., Louis

XIII., and Louis XIV. lived in the parish: the Duc d'Epernon, in the Rue

Platrière (now Jean-Jacques-Rousseau, by reason of the sage having

occupied the 4th _étage_ of No. 49, in the year 1770); Cardinal

Richelieu, in the Rue St.-Honoré, au Palais-Cardinal, otherwise the

modern tourist's hunting-ground, the Palais-Royal; and Mazarin, the Rue

Neuve-des-Petits-Champs. The _curés_ were naturally much in vogue as

confessors and directors to these high personages and their swarms of

followers and appendages--men and women. One of the rectors, preaching

in 1537, before the King (François I.), the Cardinal de Lorraine,

brother of the Duc de Guise, the Cardinal de Tournon, and ladies and

gentlemen of the court, seems to have been shaky in his theology,

according to some of his hearers, but _estonnant de vérité_, quoth

others. Even the royal mind itself was unquiet for several days, but

upon persuasion by the Cardinals it became reassured.

It was a time of troubles, civil and religious. The church work was

stopped, and horrors were around, for in 1558 a poor student, denounced

as a Lutheran by an old zealot of the weaker sex, was dragged out of the

church and massacred upon the steps. But to return to Messire Jean

Lecoq, the aforesaid _curé_. In the choir is his tomb, where he was

buried with several of his relatives. His epitaph, bearing his arms

_d'azur au coq d'or_, is as follows:

_Nobilis venerabilis D. Magister Joannes Lecoq._

_Hujus ecclesiæ pastor_--1568.

ANT. LECOQ, SEIG. D'ESGRENAY ET DE CORBEUIL (frère du curé), 1566.

F. PAJOT, SEIGNEUR DE BURY, mari D'ESTIENNETTE LECOQ, 1563

F. PAJOT, SEIG. D'AUTEUIL, LEUR FILS, 1583.

A story is told of this reverend _curé_ by Bonaventure Déperriers, in

his _Joyeux Devis_, which, if not authentic, is characteristic of the

times. A certain popular actor and head of a wandering dramatic company,

one Jean de l'Espine, called _Pont-Allais_, was one day beating his drum

near the church, to announce the commencement of his entertainment.

Within the church the _curé_ was preaching, but alas, his voice could

not be heard above the rattle outside. Exit the preacher from his

pulpit. He hurries out, and addresses the comedian upon the stage of his

booth: "How can you dare to strum while I am preaching?" "And how can

you dare to preach while I am drumming?" retorted the actor. The _curé_,

enraged at this impudent reply, broke the drum; but Jean _Pont-Allais_,

with the swiftness of a man of action, seized the priest, and popping

the drum upon his head, pushed him into the church. Whether the

discourse was continued, with or without the _coiffure_, history does

not relate. Jean Lecoq died in 1568.

René Benoist, born at Angers, and a member of the school of theologians

calling itself the Société Royale de Navarre, was, when quite young,

the confessor of Marie Stuart, whom he followed to Scotland. Upon the

death of the queen he became _curé_ of St. Pierre-des-Arcis, and

afterwards of S. Eustache. At the commencement of his career he was a

_Ligueur_, and by reason of his great influence was nicknamed _le roi

des Halles_. In 1588 he pronounced a funeral oration upon the

assassinated Guises at Blois:

Escouté, peuple, dit-il, par Isaïe: _Auferam a vobis fortem et

virum bellatorem, judicem et prophetam._ Quand Dieu veut punir un

peuple, il oste les personnes généreux et le conseil, car comme

disait Cicéron en son premier des Offices: _Non valent arma foris

nisi sit consilium domi._ Nous avions tous les deux en ce bon

prince le duc de Guise: il était fort comme un Samson, prudent et

advisé comme un Salomon.... Les anciens disaient un exercite estre

plus fort quand le chef est lion que quand les soldats sont lions

et le chef cerf.... Cette balafre qu'il portait, c'était en

conservant la religion et l'état en France qu'il l'avait endurée.

Cela devait faire peur aux méchants, _non est vulnus aversum sed

adversum_. Faut des hommes vaillants, balafrés, qui ne fuient pas

et ainsi que Notre Seigneur a porté ses cicatrices au ciel pour

montrer ce qu'il avait enduré ainsi il a porté sa balafre pour le

témoignage de sa vertu. II ne faut pas perdre courage, la maison en

est seulement escornée. (Then he concluded thus:) Prions Dieu pour

les échevins d'icelle, qu'ils aient la crainte de Dieu et une bonne

prudence. Ce mot d'échevins veut dire chefs de la ville, _sicut

capita Urbis_. Je les compare aux quatre parties qui conservent la

santé de l'homme et aux quatre éléments qui sont les choses les

plus nécessaires au monde. Paris a pour ses armes un navire qu'est

_Mare populi_, ceux là sont les pilotes; ils quéront à Dieu qu'il

leur donne son saint Spérit, mais surtout à eux et à nous l'union,

faut que Civitas soit Civium unitas.

However, going over to the enemy, like many a better man, Benoist became

the butt of l'Estoile:

_De trois B B B garder se doit on,_

_De Bourges, Benoist et Bourbon._

_Bourges croit Dieu piteusement,_

_Benoist le prêche finement,_

_Mais Dieu nous gard' de la finesse_

_Et de Bourbon et de sa messe._

Another preacher of the time, Master Rose, gave Benoist the nickname of

_le Diable des Halles_; but nevertheless he remained faithful to the

king's party, and controverted those who refused to receive the royal

heretic, even if he were to be converted. These views of the _curé_,

coming to the ears of the Duc de Mayenne, caused Benoist to be sent for

when the time came for Henri to abjure Protestantism, and he was present

at S. Denis on the memorable 25th of July, 1592, when the king heard the

mass which he bargained for the city of Paris.

This, of course, angered the Ligueurs yet more, and one said publicly

that Benoist deserved to be hanged; and a poor woman of the parish (one

of the forerunners of the celebrated "Dames de la Halle" who more than

once defended their _curés_ at all costs) was mauled and mangled by a

Spanish soldier for having stood up for her parish priest and pronounced

him a worthy man. Later on, being named bishop of Troyes by the king

(whose confessor he became), the Ligue refused him obedience. Benoist

was not only a fervent politician; he was also a writer of no mean

merit, a learned preacher, an erudite theologian, and, above all, a

friend beloved of his parishioners. He left his mark upon the church,

embellishing the great door with a representation of his patron S. René,

and composing an anthem, which was performed upon his _fête_ day. Some

authorities, Launoy to wit, give the number of his works as 154, Niceron

159. He was forty years at S. Eustache, and ten years dean of the

Faculty of Theology. He died on the 7th March, 1608, at the ripe old age

of eighty-seven, and just two years before the assassination of Henri,

which took place at the very doors, one may say, of S. Eustache, in the

Rue de la Ferronnerie.

After the death of René, Benoist's successor, we find the "Dames de la

Halle" coming to the fore and asserting their importance. It appears

that the appointment by the archbishop of a new curate (I use this term

in its proper sense: the occupier of a cure) to succeed M. Tonnellier,

led to a three day's revolt. The nephew of the latter, having been

promised the cure by his uncle, opposed the new appointment, and,

assisted by the market women, repulsed the soldiers--sent them flying,

says tradition. However that may be, there was a vast commotion, which

lasted three days, and was only ended by a species of armistice. "Les

Dames de la Halle" consented to send a deputation to the queen (although

it is not very apparent what her majesty could do in the matter), and

after giving an account of the cause of the trouble, the envoy went on

as follows:--

Notre curé qui est mort était si bon, si humain que nous l'avons

tous pleuré. En mourant il a désigné son neveu pour son successeur

et l'on a voulu nous en donner un autre. Ce n'est pas juste,

n'est-ce pas, madame la Reine? Les Marlin, voyez-vous, depuis bien

longtemps, sont curés de Saint-Eustache, _de père en fils_, et les

paroissiens n'en souffriront pas d'autre.

The curious argument advanced by the deputy in favour of Marlin no doubt

amused the queen, and she promised to do what she could. But "Les Dames"

would have no evasive answers; they wanted their curate and intended to

have him; and so, on their return, chains were put across the streets,

barricades were commenced, and the revolt waxed stronger. At this

juncture, the archbishop gave way, and the nephew was installed amidst

enthusiastic cries of _Vive l'archevêque! Vive la reine!_ While upon the

church some wag placarded a notice: _Avis. Le curé de Saint-Eustache est

à la nomination des Dames de la Halle._

This little tale seems to have been the origin of the romantic story

trumped up in 1783, in which Marie Antoinette is said to have given a

flower-girl her bracelet in recognition of some interview between them;

which story was added to and amended later on, to the effect that the

queen, upon her way to the guillotine, recognising the girl by her

bracelet, betrayed her, and thus inadvertently caused her arrest and

execution.

This Marlin was curate when Louis XIV. made his first communion at S.

Eustache, that being his parish church at the time he was living in the

Palais-Royal with his mother. Louis' last wife was also a parishioner of

S. Eustache before her marriage with Scarron. As Frances d'Aubigné she

seems to have been as much of a _dévote_ as in her later days, for she

arose at midnight, and attended matins at two of the clock. At that time

she was in receipt of alms from a charitable lady of the parish, and her

extraordinary career had scarcely commenced.

Funeral orations abounded at S. Eustache. In 1666 Anne of Austria was

eulogised by a celebrated preacher, père Sénault, in no mild terms:--

Souffrez que je vous dise que si elle a vaincu la douleur et la

mort, si elle a procuré la paix à l'Europe, si elle a heureusement

gouverné l'Etat pendant sa régence, si elle a obtenu des enfants du

Ciel, ce n'a été que parce qu'elle se confiait en Dieu et qu'elle

l'a obligé de faire cent miracles en sa faveur parce qu'elle

espérait en sa bonté, _spera in eo et ipse faciet_.

Ten years later a greater preacher, the eloquent Fléchier, was called

upon to sing the praises of Turenne, all the world following in the

train of the king to hear him:

The Churches of Paris, from Clovis to Charles X · 第 11 / 28 段