IV

Nelson was little known to his countrymen before the St. Vincent

battle. But after the victory of the Nile his name became immortal,

and he could take any liberty he liked with our national

conventionalisms. Even his love affairs were regarded as heroics. He

refused occasionally to carry out instructions when he thought his own

plans were better, and it was winked at; but had any of them

miscarried, the memory of St. Vincent and the Nile would not have

lived long.

When he arrived with the Hamiltons in London after his long absence

and victorious record, the mob, as usual, took the horses from the

carriage and dragged him along Cheapside amid tumultuous cheers.

Whenever he appeared in public the same thing happened. At Court,

things were different. His reception was offensively cold, and George

III ran some risk when he affronted his most popular subject by

turning his back on him. Whatever private indiscretions Nelson may

have been guilty of, nothing could justify so ungrateful an act of

ill-mannered snobbery. The King should have known how to distinguish

between private weakness, however unconventional, and matchless public

service. But for the fine genius and patriotism of this noble fellow,

he might have lost his crown. The temper of a capricious public in an

era of revolution should not be tested by freaks of royal

self-righteousness, while its imagination is being stirred by the

deeds of a national hero. His action might have brought the dignity of

George's kingliness into the gutter of ridicule, which would have been

a public misfortune.

The King's treatment of Nelson was worse than tactless; it was an

impertinence. King Edward VII, whose wisdom and tact could always be

trusted, might have disapproved, as strongly as did George III,

Nelson's disregard of social conventions, but he would have received

him on grounds of high public service, and have let his private

faults, if he knew of them, pass unnoticed, instead of giving him an

inarticulate snub. Still, a genius of naval distinction, or any other,

has no right to claim exemption from a law that governs a large

section of society, or to suppose that he may not be criticized or

even ostracized if he defiantly offends the susceptibilities of our

moral national life. And it is rather a big tax on one's patience for

a man, because of his exalted position and distinguished deeds of

valour and high services rendered to the State, to expect that he may

be granted licence to parade his gallantries with women in boastful

indifference to the moral law that governs the lives of a large

section of the community. There are undoubtedly cases of ill-assorted

unions, but it does not lie within our province to judge such cases.

They may be victims of a hard fate far beyond the knowledge of the

serene critics, whose habit of life is to sneak into the sacred

affairs of others, while their own may be in need of vigilant enquiry

and adjustment.

It would hardly be possible, with the facts before us, to say a word

in mitigation of Nelson's ostentatious infatuation for Lady Hamilton,

were it not that he can never be judged from the same standpoint as

ordinary mortals. That is not to say that a man, mentally constituted

as he was, should not be amenable to established social laws.

Nelson was a compound of peculiarities, like most men who are put into

the world to do something great. He was amusingly vain, while his

dainty vanity so obscured his judgment that he could not see through

the most fulsome flattery, especially that of women. At the same time

he was professionally keen, with a clear-seeing intellect, dashing,

flawless courage, and a mind that quickly grasped the weak points of

the enemy's position or formation. He fought the old form of sea

warfare by methods that were exclusively his, and sent his opponents

staggering into confusion. Once a plan of battle had been arranged, he

never faltered in his judgment, and only manoeuvred as circumstances

arose, but always with that unexpected rush and resource which carried

with it certain victory.

Nelson's great talents and his victories caused society outwardly to

overlook his connection with the notorious Lady Hamilton. But the

gossips were always at work. On this point he does not seem to have

realized that he was playing pranks with society, though there were

abundant evidences of it. He was offended because at Dresden, on their

way to England, the Electress refused to receive his mistress on

account of her antecedents, and no Court was held during their stay.

Of course Emma was given the cold shoulder in England by the Court and

by society. Nelson told his friend Collingwood of his own treatment,

and added that, either as a public or private man, he wished nothing

undone which he had done. He told Collingwood of his cold reception by

the King, but it seems quite obvious that he maintained his belief

that his connection with Emma had no right to be questioned by His

Majesty or any of his subjects, and he held this view to the last. He

would have none of the moralists' cant lavished on him, and by his

consistent attitude seemed to say, "Hands off my private life! If I

_did_ introduce Lady Hamilton to my wife at her apartments on my

arrival in England after two and a half years' absence, when she was

on the point of becoming the mother of Horatia, what business is that

of yours? I will have none of your abstract morality. Get away, and

clean up your own morals before you talk to me of mine." The above is

what I think a man of Nelson's temperament might say to the people who

wished to warn him against the dangerous course he was pursuing. Lady

Nelson does not seem to have been a woman who could appeal to a man

like Nelson. The fact is she may have been one of those unamiable,

sexless females who was either coldly ignoring her husband or storing

up in her heart any excuse for hurling at him the most bitter

invective with which she might humiliate him. She does not appear to

have been a vulgar shrieker, but she may have been a silent stabber,

which is worse. In any case, Nelson seems to have made a bad choice,

as by his actions he openly avowed that he preferred to live with the

former mistress of Featherstonehaugh, Greville, and Hamilton, rather

than with his lawful wife; and he, without a doubt, was the best judge

as to which of them suited him best. The truth remains that Emma was

attractive and talented, and although lowly born, she became the bosom

companion of kings, queens, princesses, princes, and of many men and

women of distinction.

Nelson must have been extraordinarily simple to imagine that his wife,

knowing, as all the world knew, that Lady Hamilton was his mistress

and a bold, unscrupulous rival, would receive her with rapturous

friendliness. The amazing puzzle to most people, then and now, is why

she received her at all, unless she wished to worm out of her the

precise nature of the intimacy. That may have been her definite

purpose in allowing the visits for two or three months; then one day

she flew into a rage, which conjures up a vision of hooks and eyes

bursting like crackers from her person, and after a theatrical display

of temper she disappears like a whirling tempest from the presence of

her faithless husband, never again to meet him. This manner of showing

resentment to the gallant sailor's fondness for the wife of Sir

William Hamilton was the last straw. There was nothing dignified in

Lady Nelson's tornado farewell to her husband; rather, if the records

may be relied on, it was accompanied by a flow of abuse which could

only emanate from an enraged termagant.

Nelson now had a free hand. His wife was to have a generous allowance

on condition that she left him alone freely to bestow his affections

on the seductive Emma, whose story, retold by Mr. Harrison, shows

Lady Nelson to have been an impossible woman to live with. She made

home hell to him, so he said. And making liberal allowance for Emma's

fibbing propensities, there are positive evidences that her story of

Nelson's home life was crammed with pathetic truths of domestic

misery. Nelson corroborates this by a letter to Emma almost

immediately after his wife's ludicrous exit. The letter is the

outpouring of an embittered soul that had been freed from purgatory

and was entering into a new joy. It is a sickening effusion of

unrestrained love-making that would put any personage of penny-novel

fame to the blush. I may as well give the full dose. Here it is:--

Now, my own dear wife: for such you are in the sight of Heaven,

I can give full scope to my feelings, for I dare say Oliver will

faithfully deliver this letter. You know, my dearest Emma, that

there is nothing in this world that I would not do for us to

live together, and to have our dear little child with us. I

firmly believe that this campaign will give us peace, and then

we will set off for Bronte. In twelve hours we shall be across

the water, and freed from all the nonsense of his friends, or

rather pretended ones. Nothing but an event happening to him

could prevent my going; and I am sure you will think so, for,

unless all matters accord, it would bring a hundred of tongues

and slanderous reports if I separated from her, which I would do

with pleasure the moment we can be united. I want to see her no

more; therefore we must manage till we can quit this country, or

your uncle dies. I love you: I never did love any one else. I

never had a dear pledge of love till you gave me one; and you,

thank my God, never gave one to anybody else. I think before

March is out, you will either see us back, or so victorious that

we shall ensure a glorious issue to our toils. Think what my

Emma will feel at seeing return safe, perhaps with a little

more fame, her own dear Nelson. Never, if I can help it, will I

dine out of my ship or go on shore, except duty calls me. Let

Sir Hyde have any glory he can catch, I envy him not. You, my

beloved Emma, and my country, are the two dearest objects of my

fond heart. _A heart susceptible and true._ Only place

confidence in me, and you shall never be disappointed. I burn

all your dear letters, because it is right for your sake; and I

wish you would burn all mine--they can do no good, and will do

us both harm if any seizure of them; or the dropping even one of

them would fill the mouths of the world sooner than we intend.

My longing for you, both person and conversation, you may

readily imagine (especially the person). No, my heart, person,

and mind are in perfect union of love towards my own dear,

beloved Emma, the real bosom friend of her, all hers, all

Emma's.

Drake, Nelson and Napoleon · 第 24 / 91 题