CHAPTER XII

WILLIAM TODD JONES. EMMET'S REBELLION

Todd Jones, Wolfe Tone, and Hon. Simon Butler were three Protestants

to whom, Mr. Froude says, the Catholic Committee voted 1,500_l._ each,

as a reward for their cordially rendered aid. This was in 1793, and we

hear no more of Todd Jones from Froude. His subsequent history is not

without interest, and seems interwoven with that of Francis Magan.

John Philpot Curran's writing-desk remains exactly as he left it

when quitting Ireland in 1817 to die. A long and cautiously written

letter,[373] without signature, dated August 13, 1803, but known to

be from Lady Moira, reposes in this desk. It was written three weeks

after Emmet's rebellion, and a month prior to his execution. The

letter begins mysteriously, 'Read, reflect, but do not answer. Time

will unfold the intentions.' She complains of information which had

been sent to the Government, regarding a trunk, assumed to be full of

papers, reaching Moira House, Usher's Island, and presumably from Todd

Jones. She declares that her rooms were ransacked, under a warrant from

the Secretary of State, and how letters addressed to Todd Jones at

Moira House had been carried to Dublin Castle. In writing to Curran,

whom she wishes to be her counsel if the matter should come to trial,

she makes light of these letters, and prudentially describes her

correspondence with Jones as mainly of an antiquarian and picturesque

interest.

Magan, who resided within a few doors of Moira House, possessed

peculiar facilities for 'setting'[374] the movements of its

_habitués_.[375] It must have been in 1802 when he was found by

Mathias O'Kelly[376] associating with Todd Jones, and that date merits

attention. 'I had been absent from Ireland for _ten_ years, from the

year 1792,' writes Jones in his petition to the king, 'during the whole

of which period I was uninterruptedly a resident in England, and in May

1802 I was indispensably compelled to return to Dublin, by an affair of

honour.'[377] Soon after he proceeded to Munster, 'which I had never

beheld, and had long entertained an inclination to see.'[378]

At what date can we trace the first arrival of Jones on his mysterious

mission to Clonakilty, where with several of his friends he was

arrested on a charge of high treason in July 1803? To that question

the answer is, December 1802. The 'Account of Secret Service Money,

applied in detecting Treasonable Conspiracies,' contains the following

entry:--'1802, December 15th, Francis Magan, by direction of Mr. Orpen,

500_l._'

There is but one family named 'Orpen' in Ireland; and the only Orpen

who could possibly be authorised to direct the payment of 500_l._ to

Magan at this time was the High Sheriff of Cork, in whose bailiwick

Jones was tracked and caught.[379]

Emmet, in his speech from the dock, denied that he was the life and

soul of the conspiracy, as alleged by Mr. Solicitor-General Plunket;

declared that men of greater mark than he were deep in it; that on his

return to Ireland he found the organisation formed; he was asked to

join it; he requested time to consider; they invited him again, and he

embarked in the enterprise. And yet, so carefully was the secret kept,

that nothing transpired to show that he had any colleagues of good

position. Lord Norbury, who tried the case, and the Attorney-General

stigmatised the plan as contemptible from the fact that Emmet's allies

were of no higher rank than 'ostlers, bakers, carpenters, and old

clothes men,' and, notwithstanding the solemnity of Emmet's dying

words, history has since given him the exclusive credit, or discredit,

of the rising of 1803.

Among others to whom suspicion attaches, although there is no absolute

evidence to show his guilt, may be mentioned William Todd Jones, a

Protestant of good family and some means, a barrister and writer, and a

member of the late Irish Parliament. The Viceregal organ, the 'Dublin

Journal,' in its issue of August 6, 1803, after noticing the arrest of

Jones, adds: 'This gentleman has been many months on a tour through the

provinces of Leinster and Munster, making speculations on the state of

the country through which he passed.' He remained eight months in Cork,

and it is a question whether, during that prolonged stay, he may not

have sought to foment revolution. All memoirs of Emmet have hitherto

been silent as regards the complicity of Cork in his designs. Kildare

is the county of which mention is chiefly made. The following from the

'Courier' (London) of August 5, 1803, furnishes a glimpse into the then

state of Cork:--

A Dublin mail arrived this evening, and brought us letters and

papers of Monday last.... Though there has been no rising in Cork,

yet very unfavourable symptoms of disaffection have appeared

there, and to the south of that city we are sorry to hear that the

malignancy of the former rebellion is by no means extinguished.

The same journal, of August 16, 1803, contains a letter 'written by a

gentleman of distinction in the county of Cork,' possibly Mr. Orpen

himself, who commanded a corps of Yeomanry. The writer, after stating

that he had spread yeomen in all directions to prevent the embarkation

of persons charged with treason, goes on to say:--

Todd Jones has been at Dr. Callanan's, Clonakilty, the last eight

months: H.,[380] by order of Government, arrested him for high

treason, as also the Doctor and his son.... These measures have

been attended with alarm; but I think we are at present quite safe;

and a strong fleet at Beerhaven relieves me from all apprehension

of an enemy.

The entire of the Yeomanry of this kingdom is now on the permanent

establishment. Our corps is strong, and without vanity a good one.

I have applied for an addition of infantry: with this augmentation,

I shall feel very little apprehension for any attack made upon us

without the aid of foreign force.

It appears from this letter, dated August, 1803, that Jones had been

then eight months at Clonakilty in the county Cork: therefore his

arrival would have been in December 1802--the very date of the payment

of 500_l._ to Magan by direction of Mr. Orpen, high sheriff for the

county. Meanwhile the locality in which Jones pitched his camp became,

from some cause, decidedly heated. A letter in the London 'Courier,'

dated 'Cork, August 21,' after recording the arrest of Todd Jones,

Donovan, and Dr. Callanan, states, 'The peasantry in the neighbourhood

of Ross, near Clonakilty, go armed to their chapels, and mount a

regular guard over their arms while they perform their devotions.'

We have seen that Magan--traditionally described as an unsociable

person, possessing few friends--maintained most intimate relations

with James Dickson of Kilmainham, in whose house Jones was also a

constant guest. About the same time as the arrest of Jones in Cork,

the 'Courier' of August 30, 1803, announces in its Dublin news:

'Yesterday Mr. James Dickson, of Kilmainham, was arrested at his house

by Messrs. Atkinson[381] and Carleton, chief peace-officers, and his

papers searched. The superintendent magistrate had him conveyed to the

Castle, where he underwent examination, and was afterwards committed to

Kilmainham Gaol.'[382]

Todd Jones, writing at the time, warmly details the circumstances of

his arrest (the italics are his own):--

My person has been assaulted in my bed at daybreak, in the

respectable mansion of a venerable friend, Doctor Callanan, near

Clonakilty, and I have been conveyed, very strongly guarded by

Troops, to an ignominious common Gaol: in reaching which, at

the moderate distance of twenty-two miles, I have been wantonly

exhibited, _like an already convicted Felon_, for two long summer

days, the first and second of August, in _Orange Triumph_, to the

gaze of a very crowded Bandon rabble; and thence paraded, with like

ostentation, _through all the streets of Cork_, as if _in progress

to Execution_.--My venerable friend and hospitable entertainer,

Doctor Calanan, a Physician of the age of seventy, with his only

son, _on my account_, have been dragged from the same mansion to

Prison, after a similar triumphant exposure of two days, to gazing

multitudes, in the short distance of twenty-two miles: a Man

eminent for a long professional life, dedicated to the Poor, and to

the Peasants, whose tears kept pace with his progress.

He then goes on to request that all concerned in his detainer,

including the Sheriff of Cork, may be summoned to the Bar of

Parliament. An account of his shattered health is sent to the Secretary

of State--'It is my liberty which I pray for--a trial--liberation--or

death! I have been a close prisoner for eleven weeks, without even

having been shown my indictment, or been told the names of my

accusers.'[383]

These complaints were made in October, 1803, but entirely failed

to obtain redress. His petition to the king, dated 1808, resumes

the story: 'Within this prison I continued confined from 23rd

July, 1803, until the latter end of October 1805, when I was

unconditionally discharged by the High Sheriff of the County of

Cork--untried--unbailed--unexamined and unredressed.'[384]

When the High Sheriff of Cork liberated Jones it may be assumed that

the same authority was instrumental in his committal. Formerly, high

sheriffs took much more active part in such proceedings than now. No

organised system of police then existed, and the high sheriffs seem to

have been duly impressed with the responsibility of their position.

On March 18, 1800, we find in the Secret Service Money Book, 100_l._

handed to Mr. Archer, High Sheriff of Wicklow, for the detection of

treason, and on April 27, 1801, a further sum. But these exertions were

dignified in comparison with the acts of Sir Judkin Fitzgerald, High

Sheriff of Tipperary, who, with his own hands, flogged the peasantry to

extort confession.

Emmet's insurrection burst forth in Dublin on the night of July 23,

1803; that same morning, and at a distance of 150 miles, Jones is

arrested.

The connection of Todd Jones with Irish politics was apparently of a

graver and more subtle sort than might be inferred from Lady Moira's

letter to Curran, or even Plowden's account of him in his History.

Plowden, a Catholic--the guest, with Jones and Magan, of James

Dickson--says that the persecution which Jones underwent at the hands

of the Government was due solely to his powerful advocacy of Catholic

Emancipation and Parliamentary Reform. He defends Jones with all the

warmth of friendship; his 'History of Ireland' enters most largely

into the case, and quotes various orators who sought to vindicate

Jones in Parliament.[385] But the reply of the ex-Secretary of State,

Mr. Wickham, finds no place, contrary to Plowden's usual honesty and

fulness in that work. Wickham, as appears from Hansard, rose from the

bed of sickness to reply to Fox, who had taken up the case of Jones,

and addressed the House sitting. He said:--

For some time after the arrest of Mr. Todd Jones, which the Irish

Government was induced to order upon information--the particulars

of which he could not with any propriety describe, but which were

satisfactory to their minds as to the measure. Mr. Jones remained

in prison without any particular inquiry having been instituted

in his case. As soon, however, as the trials which followed the

insurrection of 1803, and which so much occupied the attention of

the Irish Government, had terminated, an inquiry into the case of

Mr. Jones took place.... He had already stated the impossibility

of giving a full explanation to the House without acting unfairly

towards the character of the Petitioner. After the trial of the

rebels, and the fullest investigation of the charge against Mr.

Jones, his case became much more serious than it appeared at the

outset. Willing, however, to act with every possible mildness,

his case was submitted to the Crown lawyers accompanied by this

question, 'whether it would be proper to liberate Mr. Jones,' and

their unanimous opinion was decidedly in the negative. The Irish

Government transmitted the case of Mr. Jones to his Majesty's

Ministers in this country, requiring their advice; and their answer

was, that it would be extremely unadvisable to allow such a person

to be at large in Ireland![386]

Of how Jones's alleged guilt was hushed up, and why the vengeance of

the Attorney-General preferred to fall on 'ostlers, bakers, carpenters,

and old clothes men,' as he said, an idea may be perhaps formed from a

letter addressed by the Right Hon. William Saurin to Jones, proposing

that he should secretly, and as if of his own accord, exile himself

from Ireland. This letter was enclosed by Wickham to Jones on October

11, 1803. Saurin, Jones states, had been his schoolfellow.[387]

Dr. Madden professes to supply a list of all persons of substance

connected with Emmet in his attempt; also of persons who were cognisant

of his plans, and were supposed to be favourably disposed towards them;

but Todd Jones obtains no place,[388] and therefore the less excuse is

needed for this effort to embrace a long neglected figure, and one not

uninteresting for 'Auld lang syne.'[389]

FOOTNOTES:

[373] The full text of this long letter will be found in the Appendix.

[374] 'Setting' is the phrase used by Mr. Secretary Cooke (see _ante_,

p. 118).

[375] _Ibid._ p. 134.

[376] See previous chap. p. 140.

[377] Mr. Jones's 'Petition to the King,' dated 'Cork, March 9, 1808';

printed in Plowden's _History of Ireland_, iii. 624.

[378] _Ibid._

[379] The records of the Chief Secretary's Office show that in 1802

Richard Thomas Orpen, of Frankford, was High Sheriff of Cork. During

the present year (1891), I found in the Irish State Papers a letter

dated 'Cork, March 24, 1802,' from the above Mr. Orpen, in his capacity

of high sheriff, regarding a correspondence he had with General Myers

as to a small assistance of cavalry.

[380] Probably Dr. Hardinge of Cork, an active agent in those troubled

times.

[381] Atkinson was desired to be on the alert in Cooke's letter to

Sirr, written on the day of Lord Edward's intended move, of which Magan

gave notice.

[382] Mr. Justice Day, writing to the Irish Government on September 27,

1803 (eight days after Emmet's execution), suggests that Lord Bantry,

who got his peerage for reporting the arrival of the French in '96,

would be a good man to make inquiries regarding Jones.

[383] _Curious Correspondence of William Todd Jones with the Secretary

of State._ Dedicated to Lord Moira and Mr. Fox. (Cork: Odell, 1804.)

[384] Plowden's _History of Ireland since the Union to 1810_, iii. 626

_et seq._

[385] Plowden's _History of Ireland since the Union to 1810_, ii. 36,

216-220, 623-632.

[386] _Hansard's Parliamentary Debates_, v. 793-5.

[387] _Curious Correspondence._ (Cork: Odell, 1804.)

[388] _United Irishmen_, iii. 329.

[389] The _Annual Register_ and other usually well-informed sources

fail to record the death of Jones. A full obituary of him appears in

the _Ulster Register_ for March 1818, iv. 186-8; and a fine monody on

'Immortal Jones,' probably by Drennan, in the same serial, pp. 224-5.

Secret Service Under Pitt · 第 12 / 22 章