CHAPTER VII.

WALLACHIA AND MOLDAVIA.--RUMANYOS.--PHYSICAL APPEARANCE.--DESCENT

FROM THE DACI.--SARMATIAN ORIGIN.--SERVIA.--MONTENEGRO.

_Wallachia and Moldavia._--The Wallachians and Moldavians are in the

same relations to the Romans and ancient Daci as the French are to the

Romans and Kelts, or the Spaniards to the Romans and Iberians. Like the

degenerate Greeks of the Byzantine empire, they call themselves _Roman_;

and their language, like the _Rumonsch_ of the Grisons and the _Romaic_

of modern Hellas, is Romane.

As the two principalities represent only a portion of the ancient Dacia,

the ethnological and political divisions differ; for, though all

Wallachians and all Moldavians are _Rumanyos_ the whole of the Rumanyos

are not Wallachian and Moldavian. They are also indigenous to

Transylvania and Bukhovinia. In Bulgaria, Thrace, and Macedonia, there

are, probably, intruders. Light made, with dark skins, black eyes, and

prominent features, they stand in strong contrast to both the Russians

and the Slovaks, with which they are in geographical contact. Nor is it

safe to refer this to Roman blood, since, according to Mr. Paget, the

Dacians of Trajan’s column have similar features--at least as far as the

profile goes, and as far as the description of a Transylvanian _Rumanyo_

applies to those of Wallachia and Moldavia.

Of all the districts on the Danube, Wallachia and Moldavia have been the

least disturbed during the last sixteen centuries. This, though it is

saying but little for a country in the most afflicted part of Europe, is

the inference from the continued existence of their language. Displaced

in all the other Danubian provinces it is still the native tongue to

upwards of 200,000 protected and half independent Rumanyi.

In detail, the ancient inhabitants of Wallachia were the Potulatensii,

the Sensii, the Salrensii, the Kiageisi, and the Piephagi of Strabo.

In Moldavia, there had been a displacement as early as the time of

Herodotus.

The Skoloti of Russia reached the Carpathians, inasmuch as they were

conterminous with the Agathyrsi, and the Agathyrsi were on the Maros,

_i.e._, in Transylvania.

Whether the Skoloti extended thus far westward, when Trajan conquered

Decebalus is uncertain. I think that during the interval between the

time of Herodotus and the Dacian war, the Skoloti had either retired or

become amalgamated; so that the Dacian population lay in one large

uniform mass from the _Vallum Romanum_ in Hungary to the _Solitude of

the Getæ_ in Bessarabia. The reasons for this are drawn from the

language.

1. This is uniform throughout, and uniformity of speech in the case of

exotic languages, is _primâ facie_ evidence of the uniformity in both

the tongue which is introduced and the original tongue of the country.

For identical fruits we must have like stocks as well as like grafts.

The Roman in a Keltic country becomes French; in an Iberic, Spanish.

2. The terminations -_ensii_ and -_dava_ are common to the whole Dacian

area--Predan-_ensii_, Rhatac-_ensii_, Alboc-_ensii_, Burid-_ensii_,

Potulat-_ensii_, Satr-_ensii_, S-_ensii_, Cot-_ensii_,

Cauco-_ensii_--Comi-_dava_, Perobori-_dava_, Rhami-_dava_, Neter-_dava_,

Burri-_dava_, Argi-_dava_, &c.

Of the uniformity of language no country, of which the early history is

equally obscure, shows stronger proofs than ancient Dacia.

The reasons for believing this to have been Sarmatian will be given in

the sequel.

Tolerably pure, for a Danubian population, the Rumanyos of Wallachia are

Romano-Slavonic. In Moldavia there is a trace of Turk (Skolotic) blood.

_Servia._--Our divisions are political; so Servia, as an independent

principality, must be dealt with by itself; and as, from their

complexity, the Austrian and Ottoman empires are reserved for the last,

it will be separated from the areas with which it is most immediately

connected--Southern Hungary and Bosnia.

Bounded by the rivers Drin and Timoc, the present principality coincides

nearly, though not quite, with the Roman Province of Mœsia Superior.

The valley of the Margus is the famous _Plain of the Triballi_

(Τριβαλλἱκον πἑδιον); the mountains, those of the Macedonian, Illyrian,

and Bulgarian frontiers.

There is the special evidence of Strabo that the Triballi and Mœsi

were Thracians, and that the Thracians and Dacians spoke the same

language. On the other hand, we learn from the same writer, that

immediately to the west of the Triballi, the Thracian type ended and the

Illyrian began. Without at present asking what this class may be, it is

important to know that three such large groups are reducible to any

single class at all. Neither is internal evidence wholly wanting for

Upper Mœsia, the only portion of the Lower Danube now under notice.

There is but a short list of geographical names: it contains, however, a

Thermi-_dava_ and a Pic-_ensii_.

We know almost as much of the wars of the Macedonians against the

Triballi, as of those of the Romans against the Mœsi. Philip and

Alexander each imperfectly reduced them. The reign of Augustus is

signalized by the Dalmatian and Pannonian triumphs. Upper Mœsia was

reduced at the same time.

_Montenegro._--In the small Republic of Montenegro, of which the

southern side is bounded by Albania, the population is Slavonic,

differing from that of Bosnia and Hertzegovna only in being independent

of the Porte, and Christian instead of Mahometan. The impracticable

character of the country, and the martial spirit of its occupants, have

preserved this single spot free from Turkish conquest. How far the blood

is pure is doubtful: since the influence of the Roman conquest of

Dalmatia, as well as that of the Greek settlements about Epidaurus is

undetermined, neither is there any clear line of demarcation between the

earliest ancestors of the Skipetar and the early ancestors of Slavonians

in regard to their respective frontiers, north and south. It is

probable, indeed, that the very earliest occupants of the Montenegro

(_Czernogora_, or, _Black Mountain_) may have belonged to the former

population; at present, however, the antipathy between the two nations

is extreme; and in no part of the whole Slavonic area are the Slavonic

characteristics more marked than in Montenegro.

The Ethnology of Europe · 第 7 / 11 章