ON GOING A JOURNEY

One of the pleasantest things in the world is going a journey; but I

like to go by myself. I can enjoy society in a room; but out of doors,

nature is company enough for me. I am then never less alone than when

alone.

"The fields his study, nature was his book."

I cannot see the wit of walking and talking at the same time. When I

am in the country, I wish to vegetate like the country. I am not for

criticising hedge-rows and black cattle. I go out of town in order to

forget the town and all that is in it. There are those who for this

purpose go to watering-places, and carry the metropolis with them. I

like more elbow-room, and fewer incumbrances. I like solitude, when I

give myself up to it, for the sake of solitude; nor do I ask for

"----a friend in my retreat,

Whom I may whisper solitude is sweet."

The soul of a journey is liberty, perfect liberty, to think, feel, do

just as one pleases. We go a journey chiefly to be free of all

impediments and of all inconveniences; to leave ourselves behind, much

more to get rid of others. It is because I want a little

breathing-space to muse on indifferent matters, where Contemplation

"May plume her feathers and let grow her wings,

That in the various bustle of resort

Were all too ruffled, and sometimes impair'd,"

that I absent myself from the town for awhile, without feeling at a

loss the moment I am left by myself. Instead of a friend in a

post-chaise or in a Tilbury, to exchange good things with, and vary

the same stale topics over again, for once let me have a truce with

impertinence. Give me the clear blue sky over my head, and the green

turf beneath my feet, a winding road before me, and a three hours'

march to dinner--and then to thinking! It is hard if I cannot start

some game on these lone heaths. I laugh, I run, I leap, I sing for

joy. From the point of yonder rolling cloud, I plunge into my past

being, and revel there, as the sun-burnt Indian plunges headlong into

the wave that wafts him to his native shore. Then long-forgotten

things, like "sunken wrack and sumless treasuries," burst upon my

eager sight, and I begin to feel, think, and be myself again. Instead

of an awkward silence, broken by attempts at wit or dull

common-places, mine is that undisturbed silence of the heart which

alone is perfect eloquence. No one likes puns, alliterations,

antitheses, argument, and analysis better than I do; but I sometimes

had rather be without them. "Leave, oh, leave me to my repose!" I have

just now other business in hand, which would seem idle to you, but is

with me "very stuff of the conscience." Is not this wild rose sweet

without a comment? Does not this daisy leap to my heart set in its

coat of emerald? Yet if I were to explain to you the circumstance that

has so endeared it to me, you would only smile. Had I not better then

keep it to myself, and let it serve me to brood over, from here to

yonder craggy point, and from thence onward to the far-distant

horizon? I should be but bad company all that way, and therefore

prefer being alone. I have heard it said that you may, when the moody

fit comes on, walk or ride on by yourself, and indulge your reveries.

But this looks like a breach of manners, a neglect of others, and you

are thinking all the time that you ought to rejoin your party. "Out

upon such half-faced fellowship," say I. I like to be either entirely

to myself, or entirely at the disposal of others; to talk or be

silent, to walk or sit still, to be sociable or solitary. I was

pleased with an observation of Mr. Cobbett's, that "he thought it a

bad French custom to drink our wine with our meals, and that an

Englishman ought to do only one thing at a time." So I cannot talk and

think, or indulge in melancholy musing and lively conversation by fits

and starts, "Let me have a companion of my way," says Sterne, "were it

but to remark how the shadows lengthen as the sun declines." It is

beautifully said: but in my opinion, this continual comparing of notes

interferes with the involuntary impression of things upon the mind,

and hurts the sentiment. If you only hint what you feel in a kind of

dumb show, it is insipid: if you have to explain it, it is making a

toil of a pleasure. You cannot read the book of nature, without being

perpetually put to the trouble of translating it for the benefit of

others. I am for the synthetical method on a journey, in preference to

the analytical. I am content to lay in a stock of ideas then, and to

examine and anatomise them afterwards. I want to see my vague notions

float like the down of the thistle before the breeze, and not to have

them entangled in the briars and thorns of controversy. For once, I

like to have it all my own way; and this is impossible unless you are

alone, or in such company as I do not covet. I have no objection to

argue a point with any one for twenty miles of measured road, but not

for pleasure. If you remark the scent of a beanfield crossing the

road, perhaps your fellow-traveller has no smell. If you point to a

distant object, perhaps he is short-sighted, and has to take out his

glass to look at it. There is a feeling in the air, a tone in the

colour of a cloud which hits your fancy, but the effect of which you

are unable to account for. There is then no sympathy, but an uneasy

craving after it, and a dissatisfaction which pursues you on the way,

and in the end probably produces ill humour. Now I never quarrel with

myself, and take all my own conclusions for granted till I find it

necessary to defend them against objections. It is not merely that you

may not be of accord on the objects and circumstances that present

themselves before you--these may recal a number of objects, and lead

to associations too delicate and refined to be possibly communicated

to others. Yet these I love to cherish, and sometimes still fondly

clutch them, when I can escape from the throng to do so. To give way

to our feelings before company, seems extravagance or affectation; and

on the other hand, to have to unravel this mystery of our being at

every turn, and to make others take an equal interest in it (otherwise

the end is not answered) is a task to which few are competent. We must

"give it an understanding, but no tongue." My old friend C----,

however, could do both. He could go on in the most delightful

explanatory way over hill and dale, a summer's day, and convert a

landscape into a didactic poem or a Pindaric ode. "He talked far above

singing." If I could so clothe my ideas in sounding and flowing words,

I might perhaps wish to have some one with me to admire the swelling

theme; or I could be more content, were it possible for me still to

hear his echoing voice in the woods of All-Foxden. They had "that fine

madness in them which our first poets had;" and if they could have

been caught by some rare instrument, would have breathed such strains

as the following.

"----Here be woods as green

As any, air likewise as fresh and sweet

As when smooth Zephyrus plays on the fleet

Face of the curled stream, with flow'rs as many

As the young spring gives, and as choice as any;

Here be all new delights, cool streams and wells,

Arbours o'ergrown with woodbine, caves and dells;

Choose where thou wilt, while I sit by and sing,

Or gather rushes to make many a ring

For thy long fingers; tell thee tales of love,

How the pale Phoebe, hunting in a grove,

First saw the boy Endymion, from whose eyes

She took eternal fire that never dies;

How she convey'd him softly in a sleep,

His temples bound with poppy, to the steep

Head of old Latmos, where she stoops each night,

Gilding the mountain with her brother's light,

To kiss her sweetest."----

Faithful Shepherdess.

Had I words and images at command like these, I would attempt to wake

the thoughts that lie slumbering on golden ridges in the evening

clouds: but at the sight of nature my fancy, poor as it is, droops and

closes up its leaves, like flowers at sunset. I can make nothing out

on the spot:--I must have time to collect myself.--

In general, a good thing spoils out-of-door prospects: it should be

reserved for Table-talk. L---- is for this reason, I take it, the

worst company in the world out of doors; because he is the best

within. I grant, there is one subject on which it is pleasant to talk

on a journey; and that is, what one shall have for supper when we get

to our inn at night. The open air improves this sort of conversation

or friendly altercation, by setting a keener edge on appetite. Every

mile of the road heightens the flavour of the viands we expect at the

end of it. How fine it is to enter some old town, walled and turreted

just at the approach of night-fall, or to come to some straggling

village, with the lights streaming through the surrounding gloom; and

then after inquiring for the best entertainment that the place

affords, to "take one's ease at one's inn!" These eventful moments in

our lives' history are too precious, too full of solid, heart-felt

happiness to be frittered and dribbled away in imperfect sympathy. I

would have them all to myself, and drain them to the last drop: they

will do to talk of or to write about afterwards. What a delicate

speculation it is, after drinking whole goblets of tea,

"The cups that cheer, but not inebriate,"

and letting the fumes ascend into the brain, to sit considering what

we shall have for supper--eggs and a rasher, a rabbit smothered in

onions, or an excellent veal-cutlet! Sancho in such a situation once

fixed upon cow-heel; and his choice, though he could not help it, is

not to be disparaged. Then in the intervals of pictured scenery and

Shandean contemplation, to catch the preparation and the stir in the

kitchen--_Procul, O procul este profani!_ These hours are sacred to

silence and to musing, to be treasured up in the memory, and to feed

the source of smiling thoughts hereafter. I would not waste them in

idle talk; or if I must have the integrity of fancy broken in upon, I

would rather it were by a stranger than a friend. A stranger takes his

hue and character from the time and place; he is a part of the

furniture and costume of an inn. If he is a Quaker, or from the West

Riding of Yorkshire, so much the better. I do not even try to

sympathise with him, and he breaks no squares. I associate nothing

with my travelling companion but present objects and passing events.

In his ignorance of me and my affairs, I in a manner forget myself.

But a friend reminds one of other things, rips up old grievances, and

destroys the abstraction of the scene. He comes in ungraciously

between us and our imaginary character. Something is dropped in the

course of conversation that gives a hint of your profession and

pursuits; or from having some one with you that knows the less sublime

portions of your history, it seems that other people do. You are no

longer a citizen of the world: but your "unhoused free condition is

put into circumscription and confine." The _incognito_ of an inn is

one of its striking privileges--"lord of one's-self, uncumber'd with a

name." Oh! it is great to shake off the trammels of the world and of

public opinion--to lose our importunate, tormenting, everlasting

personal identity in the elements of nature, and become the creature

of the moment, clear of all ties--to hold to the universe only by a

dish of sweet-breads, and to owe nothing but the score of the

evening--and no longer seeking for applause and meeting with contempt,

to be known by no other title than _the Gentleman in the parlour_! One

may take one's choice of all characters in this romantic state of

uncertainty as to one's real pretensions, and become indefinitely

respectable and negatively right-worshipful. We baffle prejudice and

disappoint conjecture; and from being so to others, begin to be

objects of curiosity and wonder even to ourselves. We are no more

those hackneyed commonplaces that we appear in the world: an inn

restores us to the level of nature, and quits scores with society! I

have certainly spent some enviable hours at inns--sometimes when I

have been left entirely to myself, and have tried to solve some

metaphysical problem, as once at Witham-common, where I found out the

proof that likeness is not a case of the association of ideas--at

other times, when there have been pictures in the room, as at St.

Neot's, (I think it was) where I first met with Gribelin's engravings

of the Cartoons, into which I entered at once, and at a little inn on

the borders of Wales, where there happened to be hanging some of

Westall's drawings, which I compared triumphantly (for a theory that I

had, not for the admired artist) with the figure of a girl who had

ferried me over the Severn, standing up in the boat between me and the

twilight--at other times I might mention luxuriating in books, with a

peculiar interest in this way, as I remember sitting up half the night

to read Paul and Virginia, which I picked up at an inn at Bridgewater,

after being drenched in the rain all day; and at the same place I got

through two volumes of Madame D'Arblay's Camilla. It was on the tenth

of April, 1798, that I sat down to a volume of the New Eloise, at the

inn at Llangollen, over a bottle of sherry and a cold chicken. The

letter I chose was that in which St. Preux describes his feelings as

he first caught a glimpse from the heights of the Jura of the Pays de

Vaud, which I had brought with me as a _bon bouche_ to crown the

evening with. It was my birth-day, and I had for the first time come

from a place in the neighbourhood to visit this delightful spot. The

road to Llangollen turns off between Chirk and Wrexham; and on passing

a certain point, you come all at once upon the valley, which opens

like an amphitheatre, broad, barren hills rising in majestic state on

either side, with "green upland swells that echo to the bleat of

flocks" below, and the river Dee babbling over its stony bed in the

midst of them. The valley at this time "glittered green with sunny

showers," and a budding ash-tree dipped its tender branches in the

chiding stream. How proud, how glad I was to walk along the high road

that overlooks the delicious prospect, repeating the lines which I

have just quoted from Mr. Coleridge's poems. But besides the prospect

which opened beneath my feet, another also opened to my inward sight,

a heavenly vision, on which were written, in letters large as Hope

could make them, these four words, LIBERTY, GENIUS, LOVE, VIRTUE;

which have since faded into the light of common day, or mock my idle

gaze.

"The beautiful is vanished, and returns not."

Still I would return some time or other to this enchanted spot; but I

would return to it alone. What other self could I find to share that

influx of thoughts, of regret, and delight, the fragments of which I

could hardly conjure up to myself, so much have they been broken and

defaced! I could stand on some tall rock, and overlook the precipice

of years that separates me from what I then was. I was at that time

going shortly to visit the poet whom I have above named. Where is he

now? Not only I myself have changed; the world, which was then new to

me, has become old and incorrigible. Yet will I turn to thee in

thought, O sylvan Dee, in joy, in youth and gladness as thou then

wert; and thou shalt always be to me the river of Paradise, where I

will drink of the waters of life freely!

There is hardly any thing that shows the short-sightedness or

capriciousness of the imagination more than travelling does. With

change of place we change our ideas; nay, our opinions and feelings.

We can by an effort indeed transport ourselves to old and

long-forgotten scenes, and then the picture of the mind revives again;

but we forget those that we have just left. It seems that we can think

but of one place at a time. The canvas of the fancy is but of a

certain extent, and if we paint one set of objects upon it, they

immediately efface every other. We cannot enlarge our conceptions, we

only shift our point of view. The landscape bares its bosom to the

enraptured eye, we take our fill of it, and seem as if we could form

no other image of beauty or grandeur. We pass on, and think no more of

it: the horizon that shuts it from our sight, also blots it from our

memory like a dream. In travelling through a wild barren country, I

can form no idea of a woody and cultivated one. It appears to me that

all the world must be barren, like what I see of it. In the country we

forget the town, and in town we despise the country. "Beyond Hyde

Park," says Sir Fopling Flutter, "all is a desert." All that part of

the map that we do not see before us is a blank. The world in our

conceit of it is not much bigger than a nutshell. It is not one

prospect expanded into another, county joined to county, kingdom to

kingdom, lands to seas, making an image voluminous and vast;--the mind

can form no larger idea of space than the eye can take in at a single

glance. The rest is a name written in a map, a calculation of

arithmetic. For instance, what is the true signification of that

immense mass of territory and population, known by the name of China

to us? An inch of paste-board on a wooden globe, of no more account

than a China orange! Things near us are seen of the size of life:

things at a distance are diminished to the size of the understanding.

We measure the universe by ourselves, and even comprehend the texture

of our own being only piece-meal. In this way, however, we remember an

infinity of things and places. The mind is like a mechanical

instrument that plays a great variety of tunes, but it must play them

in succession. One idea recalls another, but it at the same time

excludes all others. In trying to renew old recollections, we cannot

as it were unfold the whole web of our existence; we must pick out the

single threads. So in coming to a place where we have formerly lived

and with which we have intimate associations, every one must have

found that the feeling grows more vivid the nearer we approach the

spot, from the mere anticipation of the actual impression: we remember

circumstances, feelings, persons, faces, names, that we had not

thought of for years; but for the time all the rest of the world is

forgotten!--To return to the question I have quitted above.

I have no objection to go to see ruins, aqueducts, pictures, in

company with a friend or a party, but rather the contrary, for the

former reason reversed. They are intelligible matters, and will bear

talking about. The sentiment here is not tacit, but communicable and

overt. Salisbury Plain is barren of criticism, but Stonehenge will

bear a discussion antiquarian, picturesque, and philosophical. In

setting out on a party of pleasure, the first consideration always is

where we shall go to: in taking a solitary ramble, the question is

what we shall meet with by the way. "The mind is its own place;" nor

are we anxious to arrive at the end of our journey. I can myself do

the honours indifferently well to works of art and curiosity. I once

took a party to Oxford with no mean _eclat_--shewed them that seat of

the Muses at a distance,

"With glistering spires and pinnacles adorn'd"--

descanted on the learned air that breathes from the grassy quadrangles

and stone walls of halls and colleges--was at home in the Bodleian;

and at Blenheim quite superseded the powdered Ciceroni that attended

us, and that pointed in vain with his wand to common-place beauties in

matchless pictures.--As another exception to the above reasoning, I

should not feel confident in venturing on a journey in a foreign

country without a companion. I should want at intervals to hear the

sound of my own language. There is an involuntary antipathy in the

mind of an Englishman to foreign manners and notions that requires the

assistance of social sympathy to carry it off. As the distance from

home increases, this relief, which was at first a luxury, becomes a

passion and an appetite. A person would almost feel stifled to find

himself in the deserts of Arabia without friends and countrymen: there

must be allowed to be something in the view of Athens or old Rome that

claims the utterance of speech; and I own that the Pyramids are too

mighty for any simple contemplation. In such situations, so opposite

to all one's ordinary train of ideas, one seems a species by

one's-self, a limb torn off from society, unless one can meet with

instant fellowship and support.--Yet I did not feel this want or

craving very pressing once, when I first set my foot on the laughing

shores of France. Calais was peopled with novelty and delight. The

confused, busy murmur of the place was like oil and wine poured into

my ears; nor did the mariners' hymn, which was sung from the top of an

old crazy vessel in the harbour, as the sun went down, send an alien

sound into my soul. I only breathed the air of general humanity. I

walked over "the vine-covered hills and gay regions of France," erect

and satisfied; for the image of man was not cast down and chained to

the foot of arbitrary thrones: I was at no loss for language, for that

of all the great schools of painting was open to me. The whole is

vanished like a shade. Pictures, heroes, glory, freedom, all are fled:

nothing remains but the Bourbons and the French people!--There is

undoubtedly a sensation in travelling into foreign parts that is to be

had nowhere else: but it is more pleasing at the time than lasting. It

is too remote from our habitual associations to be a common topic of

discourse or reference, and, like a dream or another state of

existence, does not piece into our daily modes of life. It is an

animated but a momentary hallucination. It demands an effort to

exchange our actual for our ideal identity; and to feel the pulse of

our old transports revive very keenly, we must "jump" all our present

comforts and connexions. Our romantic and itinerant character is not

to be domesticated. Dr. Johnson remarked how little foreign travel

added to the facilities of conversation in those who had been abroad.

In fact, the time we have spent there is both delightful and in one

sense instructive; but it appears to be cut out of our substantial,

downright existence, and never to join kindly on to it. We are not the

same, but another, and perhaps more enviable individual, all the time

we are out of our own country. We are lost to ourselves, as well as

our friends. So the poet somewhat quaintly sings,

"Out of my country and myself I go."

Those who wish to forget painful thoughts, do well to absent

themselves for a while from the ties and objects that recal them: but

we can be said only to fulfil our destiny in the place that gave us

birth. I should on this account like well enough to spend the whole of

my life in travelling abroad, if I could any where borrow another life

to spend afterwards at home!

_Hazlitt._

A century of English essays · 第 95 / 131 题