MY FIRST PLAY

At the north end of Cross Court there yet stands a portal, of some

architectural pretensions, though reduced to humble use, serving at

present for an entrance to a printing-office. This old door-way, if

you are young, reader, you may not know was the identical pit entrance

to Old Drury--Garrick's Drury--all of it that is left. I never pass it

without shaking some forty years from off my shoulders, recurring to

the evening when I passed through it to see _my first play_. The

afternoon had been wet, and the condition of our going (the elder

folks and myself) was, that the rain should cease. With what a beating

heart did I watch from the window the puddles, from the stillness of

which I was taught to prognosticate the desired cessation! I seem to

remember the last spurt, and the glee with which I ran to announce it.

We went with orders, which my godfather F.[23] had sent us. He kept

the oil shop (now Davies's) at the corner of Featherstone Building, in

Holborn. F. was a tall grave person, lofty in speech, and had

pretensions above his rank. He associated in those days with John

Palmer, the comedian, whose gait and bearing he seemed to copy; if

John (which is quite as likely) did not rather borrow somewhat of his

manner from my godfather. He was also known to, and visited by,

Sheridan. It was to his house in Holborn that young Brinsley brought

his first wife on her elopement with him from a boarding-school at

Bath--the beautiful Maria Linley. My parents were present (over a

quadrille table) when he arrived in the evening with his harmonious

charge.--From either of these connexions it may be inferred that my

godfather could command an order for the then Drury Lane theatre at

pleasure--and, indeed, a pretty liberal issue of those cheap billets,

in Brinsley's easy autograph, I have heard him say was the sole

remuneration which he had received for many years' nightly

illumination of the orchestra and various avenues of that theatre--and

he was content it should be so. The honour of Sheridan's

familiarity--or supposed familiarity--was better to my godfather than

money.

[Footnote 23: Field.]

F. was the most gentlemanly of oilmen: grandiloquent, yet courteous.

His delivery of the commonest matters of fact was Ciceronian. He had

two Latin words almost constantly in his mouth (how odd sounds Latin

from an oilman's lips!), which my better knowledge since has enabled

me to correct. In strict pronunciation they should have been sounded

_vice versa_--but in those young years they impressed me with more awe

than they would now do, read aright from Seneca or Varro--in his own

peculiar pronunciation monosyllabically elaborated, or Anglicised,

into something like _verse verse_. By an imposing manner, and the help

of these distorted syllables, he climbed (but that was little) to the

highest parochial honours which St. Andrew's has to bestow.

He is dead--and thus much I thought due to his memory, both for my

first orders (little wondrous talismans!--slight keys, and

insignificant to outward sight, but opening to me more than Arabian

paradises!) and moreover, that by his testamentary beneficence I came

into possession of the only landed property which I could ever call my

own--situate near the road-way village of pleasant Puckeridge, in

Hertfordshire. When I journeyed down to take possession, and planted

foot on my own ground, the stately habits of the donor descended upon

me, and I strode (shall I confess the vanity?) with larger paces over

my allotment of three-quarters of an acre, with its commodious mansion

in the midst, with the feeling of an English freeholder that all

betwixt sky and centre was my own. The estate has passed into more

prudent hands, and nothing but an agrarian can restore it.

In those days were pit orders. Beshrew the uncomfortable manager who

abolished them!--with one of these we went. I remember the waiting at

the door--not that which is left--but between that and an inner door

in shelter--O when shall I be such an expectant again!--with the cry

of nonpareils, an indispensable play-house accompaniment in those

days. As near as I can recollect, the fashionable pronunciation of the

theatrical fruiteresses then was, "Chase some oranges, chase some

numparels, chase a bill of the play;"--chase _pro_ chuse. But when we

got in, and I beheld the green curtain that veiled a heaven to my

imagination, which was soon to be disclosed----the breathless

anticipations I endured! I had seen something like it in the plate

prefixed to Troilus and Cressida, in Rowe's Shakespeare--the tent

scene with Diomede--and a sight of that plate can always bring back in

a measure the feeling of that evening.--The boxes at that time, full

of well-dressed women of quality, projected over the pit; and the

pilasters reaching down were adorned with a glistering substance (I

know not what) under glass (as it seemed), resembling--a homely

fancy--but I judged it to be sugar-candy--yet, to my raised

imagination, divested of its homelier qualities, it appeared a

glorified candy!--The orchestra lights at length arose, those "fair

Auroras!" Once the bell sounded. It was to ring out yet once

again--and, incapable of the anticipation, I reposed my shut eyes in a

sort of resignation upon the maternal lap. It rang the second time.

The curtain drew up--I was not past six years old--and the play was

Artaxerxes!

I had dabbled a little in the Universal History--the ancient part of

it--and here was the court of Persia. I was being admitted to a sight

of the past. I took no proper interest in the action going on, for I

understood not its import--but I heard the word Darius, and I was in

the midst of Daniel. All feeling was absorbed in vision. Gorgeous

vests, gardens, palaces, princesses, passed before me. I knew not

players. I was in Persepolis for the time; and the burning idol of

their devotion almost converted me into a worshipper. I was

awe-struck, and believed those significations to be something more

than elemental fires. It was all enchantment and a dream. No such

pleasure has since visited me but in dreams.--Harlequin's invasion

followed; where, I remember, the transformation of the magistrates

into reverend beldams seemed to me a piece of grave historic justice,

and the tailor carrying his own head to be as sober a verity as the

legend of St. Denys.

The next play to which I was taken was the Lady of the Manor, of

which, with the exception of some scenery, very faint traces are left

in my memory. It was followed by a pantomime, called Lun's Ghost--a

satiric touch, I apprehend, upon Rich, not long since dead--but to my

apprehension (too sincere for satire), Lun was as remote a piece of

antiquity as Lud--the father of a line of Harlequins--transmitting his

dagger of lath (the wooden sceptre) through countless ages. I saw the

primeval Motley come from his silent tomb in a ghastly vest of white

patch-work, like the apparition of a dead rainbow. So Harlequins

(thought I) look when they are dead.

My third play followed in quick succession. It was the Way of the

World. I think I must have sat at it as grave as a judge; for, I

remember, the hysteric affectations of good Lady Wishfort affected me

like some solemn tragic passion. Robinson Crusoe followed; in which

Crusoe, man Friday, and the parrot, were as good and authentic as in

the story.--The clownery and pantaloonery of these pantomimes have

clean passed out of my head. I believe, I no more laughed at them,

than at the same age I should have been disposed to laugh at the

grotesque Gothic heads (seeming to me then replete with devout

meaning) that gape, and grin, in stone around the inside of the old

Round Church (my church) of the Templars.

I saw these plays in the season 1781-2, when I was from six to seven

years old. After the intervention of six or seven other years (for at

school all play-going was inhibited) I again entered the doors of a

theatre. That old Artaxerxes evening had never done ringing in my

fancy. I expected the same feelings to come again with the same

occasion. But we differ from ourselves less at sixty and sixteen, than

the latter does from six. In that interval what had I not lost! At the

first period I knew nothing, understood nothing, discriminated

nothing. I felt all, loved all, wondered all--

A century of English essays · 第 79 / 131 题