CHAPTER II.

POLITENESS.

Real politeness is the outward expression of the most generous impulses

of the heart. It enforces unselfishness, benevolence, kindness, and the

golden rule, "Do unto others as you would others should do unto you."

Thus its first principle is love for the neighbor, loving him as

yourself.

When in society it would often be exceedingly difficult to decide how to

treat those who are personally disagreeable to us, if it were not for

the rules of politeness, and the little formalities and points of

etiquette which these rules enforce. These evidences of polite breeding

do not prove hypocrisy, as you may treat your most bitter enemy with

perfect courtesy, and yet make no protestations of friendship.

If politeness is but a mask, as many philosophers tell us, it is a mask

which will win love and admiration, and is better worn than cast aside.

If you wear it with the sincere desire to give pleasure to others, and

make all the little meetings of life pass off smoothly and agreeably, it

will soon cease to be a mask, but you will find that the manner which

you at first put on to give pleasure, has become natural to you, and

wherever you have assumed a virtue to please others, you will find the

virtue becoming habitual and finally natural, and part of yourself.

Do not look upon the rules of etiquette as deceptions. They are just as

often vehicles for the expression of sincere feeling, as they are the

mask to conceal a want of it.

You will in society meet with men who rail against politeness, and call

it deceit and hypocrisy. Watch these men when they have an object to

gain, or are desirous of making a favorable impression, and see them

tacitly, but unconsciously, admit the power of courtesy, by dropping for

the time, their uncouth ways, to affect the politeness, they oftentimes

do not feel.

Pass over the defects of others, be prudent, discreet, at the proper

time reserved, yet at other times frank, and treat others with the same

gentle courtesy you would wish extended to yourself.

True politeness never embarrasses any one, because its first object is

to put all at their ease, while it leaves to all perfect freedom of

action. You must meet rudeness from others by perfect politeness and

polish of manner on your own part, and you will thus shame those who

have been uncivil to you. You will more readily make them blush by your

courtesy, than if you met their rudeness by ill manners on your own

part.

While a favor may be doubled in value, by a frankly courteous manner of

granting it, a refusal will lose half its bitterness if your manner

shows polite regret at your inability to oblige him who asks the favor

at your hand.

Politeness may be extended to the lowest and meanest, and you will

never by thus extending it detract from your own dignity. A _gentleman_

may and will treat his washerwoman with respect and courtesy, and his

boot-black with pleasant affability, yet preserve perfectly his own

position. To really merit the name of a polite, finished gentleman, you

must be polite at all times and under all circumstances.

There is a difference between politeness and etiquette. Real politeness

is in-born, and may exist in the savage, while etiquette is the outward

expression of politeness reduced to the rules current in good society.

A man may be polite, really so in heart, yet show in every movement an

ignorance of the rules of etiquette, and offend against the laws of

society. You may find him with his elbows upon the table, or tilting his

chair in a parlor. You may see him commit every hour gross breaches of

etiquette, yet you will never hear him intentionally utter one word to

wound another, you will see that he habitually endeavors to make others

comfortable, choosing for them the easiest seats, or the daintiest

dishes, and putting self entirely aside to contribute to the pleasure of

all around him. Such a man will learn, by contact with refined society,

that his ignorance of the rules which govern it, make him, at times,

disagreeable, and from the same unselfish motive which prompts him to

make a sacrifice of comfort for the sake of others, he will watch and

learn quickly, almost by instinct, where he offends against good

breeding, drop one by one his errors in etiquette, and become truly a

gentleman.

On the other hand, you will meet constantly, in the best society, men

whose polish of manner is exquisite, who will perform to the minutest

point the niceties of good breeding, who never commit the least act that

is forbidden by the strictest rules of etiquette; yet under all this

mask of chivalry, gallantry, and politeness will carry a cold, selfish

heart; will, with a sweet smile, graceful bow, and elegant language,

wound deeply the feelings of others, and while passing in society for

models of courtesy and elegance of manner, be in feeling as cruel and

barbarous as the veriest savage.

So I would say to you, Cultivate your heart. Cherish there the Christian

graces, love for the neighbor, unselfishness, charity, and gentleness,

and you will be truly a gentleman; add to these the graceful forms of

etiquette, and you then become a _perfect_ gentleman.

Etiquette exists in every corner of the known world, from the savages in

the wilds of Africa, who dare not, upon penalty of death, approach their

barbarous rulers without certain forms and ceremonies, to the most

refined circles of Europe, where gentle chivalry and a cultivated mind

suggest its rules. It has existed in all ages, and the stringency of its

laws in some countries has given rise to both ludicrous and tragic

incidents.

In countries where royalty rules the etiquette, it often happens that

pride will blind those who make the rules, and the results are often

fatal. Believing that the same deference which their rank authorized

them to demand, was also due to them as individuals, the result of such

an idea was an etiquette as vain and useless as it was absurd.

For an example I will give an anecdote:

"The kings of Spain, the proudest and vainest of all kings of the

earth, made a rule of etiquette as stupid as it was useless. It was a

fault punishable by death to touch the foot of the queen, and the

individual who thus offended, no matter under what circumstances, was

executed immediately.

"A young queen of Spain, wife of Charles the Second, was riding on

horseback in the midst of her attendants. Suddenly the horse reared and

threw the queen from the saddle. Her foot remained in the stirrup, and

she was dragged along the ground. An immense crowd stood looking at this

spectacle, but no one dared, for his life, to attempt to rescue the poor

woman. She would have died, had not two young French officers, ignorant

of the stupid law which paralyzed the Spaniards, sprung forward and

saved her. One stopped the horse, and whilst he held the bridle, his

companion disengaged from its painful position the foot of the young

queen, who was, by this time, insensible from fear and the bruises which

she had already received. They were instantly arrested, and while the

queen was carried on a litter to the palace, her young champions were

marched off, accompanied by a strong guard, to prison. The next day,

sick and feeble, the queen was obliged to leave her bed, and on her

knees before the king, plead for the pardon of the two Frenchmen; and

her prayer was only granted upon condition that the audacious foreigners

left Spain immediately."

There is no country in the world where the absurdities of etiquette are

carried to so great a length as in Spain, because there is no nation

where the nobility are so proud. The following anecdote, which

illustrates this, would seem incredible were it not a historical fact:

"Philip the Third, king of Spain, was sick, and being able to sit up,

was carefully placed in an arm chair which stood opposite to a large

fire, when the wood was piled up to an enormous height. The heat soon

became intolerable, and the courtiers retired from around the king; but,

as the Duke D'Ussede, the fire stirrer for the king, was not present,

and as no one else had the right to touch the fire, those present dared

not attempt to diminish the heat. The grand chamberlain was also absent,

and he alone was authorized to touch the king's footstool. The poor

king, too ill to rise, in vain implored those around him to move his

chair, no one dared touch it, and when the grand chamberlain arrived,

the king had fainted with the heat, and a few days later he died,

literally roasted to death."

At almost all times, and in almost all places, good breeding may be

shown; and we think a good service will be done by pointing out a few

plain and simple instances in which it stands opposed to habits and

manners, which, though improper and disagreeable, are not very uncommon.

In the familiar intercourse of society, a well-bred _man_ will be known

by the delicacy and deference with which he behaves towards females.

That man would deservedly be looked upon as very deficient in proper

respect and feeling, who should take any physical advantage of one of

the weaker sex, or offer any personal slight towards her. Woman looks,

and properly looks, for protection to man. It is the province of the

husband to shield the wife from injury; of the father to protect the

daughter; the brother has the same duty to perform towards the sister;

and, in general, every man should, in this sense, be the champion and

the lover of every woman. Not only should he be ready to protect, but

desirous to please, and willing to sacrifice much of his own personal

ease and comfort, if, by doing so, he can increase those of any female

in whose company he may find himself. Putting these principles into

practice, a well-bred man, in his own house, will be kind and respectful

in his behaviour to every female of the family. He will not use towards

them harsh language, even if called upon to express dissatisfaction with

their conduct. In conversation, he will abstain from every allusion

which would put modesty to the blush. He will, as much as in his power,

lighten their labors by cheerful and voluntary assistance. He will yield

to them every little advantage which may occur in the regular routine of

domestic life:--the most comfortable seat, if there be a difference; the

warmest position by the winter's fireside; the nicest slice from the

family joint, and so on.

In a public assembly of any kind, a well-bred man will pay regard to the

feelings and wishes of the females by whom he is surrounded. He will not

secure the best seat for himself, and leave the women folk to take care

of themselves. He will not be seated at all, if the meeting be crowded,

and a single female appear unaccommodated.

Good breeding will keep a person from making loud and startling noises,

from pushing past another in entering or going out of a room; from

ostentatiously using a pocket-handkerchief; from hawking and spitting

in company; from fidgeting any part of the body; from scratching the

head, or picking the teeth with fork or with finger. In short, it will

direct all who study its rules to abstain from every personal act which

may give pain or offence to another's feelings. At the same time, it

will enable them to bear much without taking offence. It will teach them

when to speak and when to be silent, and how to behave with due respect

to all. By attention to the rules of good breeding, and more especially

to its leading principles, "the poorest man will be entitled to the

character of a gentleman, and by inattention to them, the most wealthy

person will be essentially vulgar. Vulgarity signifies coarseness or

indelicacy of manner, and is not necessarily associated with poverty or

lowliness of condition. Thus an operative artizan may be a gentleman,

and worthy of our particular esteem; while an opulent merchant may be

only a vulgar clown, with whom it is impossible to be on terms of

friendly intercourse."

The following remarks upon the "Character of a Gentleman" by Brooke are

so admirable that I need make no apology for quoting them entire. He

says; "There is no term, in our language, more common than that of

'Gentleman;' and, whenever it is heard, all agree in the general idea of

a man some way elevated above the vulgar. Yet, perhaps, no two living

are precisely agreed respecting the qualities they think requisite for

constituting this character. When we hear the epithets of a 'fine

Gentleman,' 'a pretty Gentleman,' 'much of a Gentleman,' 'Gentlemanlike,'

'something of a Gentleman,' 'nothing of a Gentleman,' and so forth; all

these different appellations must intend a peculiarity annexed to the

ideas of those who express them; though no two of them, as I said, may

agree in the constituent qualities of the character they have formed in

their own mind. There have been ladies who deemed fashionable dress a

very capital ingredient in the composition of--a Gentleman. A certain

easy impudence acquired by low people, by casually being conversant in

high life, has passed a man current through many companies for--a

Gentleman. In taverns and brothels, he who is the most of a bully is the

most of--a Gentleman. And the highwayman, in his manner of taking your

purse, may however be allowed to have--much of the Gentleman. Plato,

among the philosophers, was 'the most of a man of fashion;' and therefore

allowed, at the court of Syracuse, to be--the most of a Gentleman. But

seriously, I apprehend that this character is pretty much upon the

modern. In all ancient or dead languages we have no term, any way

adequate, whereby we may express it. In the habits, manners, and

characters of old Sparta and old Rome, we find an antipathy to all the

elements of modern gentility. Among these rude and unpolished people,

you read of philosophers, of orators, of patriots, heroes, and demigods;

but you never hear of any character so elegant as that of--a pretty

Gentleman.

"When those nations, however, became refined into what their ancestors

would have called corruption; when luxury introduced, and fashion gave a

sanction to certain sciences, which Cynics would have branded with the

ill mannered appellations of drunkenness, gambling, cheating, lying,

&c.; the practitioners assumed the new title of Gentlemen, till such

Gentlemen became as plenteous as stars in the milky-way, and lost

distinction merely by the confluence of their lustre. Wherefore as the

said qualities were found to be of ready acquisition, and of easy

descent to the populace from their betters, ambition judged it necessary

to add further marks and criterions for severing the general herd from

the nobler species--of Gentlemen.

"Accordingly, if the commonalty were observed to have a propensity to

religion, their superiors affected a disdain of such vulgar prejudices;

and a freedom that cast off the restraints of morality, and a courage

that spurned at the fear of a God, were accounted the distinguishing

characteristics--of a Gentleman.

"If the populace, as in China, were industrious and ingenious, the

grandees, by the length of their nails and the cramping of their limbs,

gave evidence that true dignity was above labor and utility, and that to

be born to no end was the prerogative--of a Gentleman.

"If the common sort, by their conduct, declared a respect for the

institutions of civil society and good government; their betters

despised such pusillanimous conformity, and the magistrates paid

becoming regard to the distinction, and allowed of the superior

liberties and privileges--of a Gentleman.

"If the lower set show a sense of common honesty and common order; those

who would figure in the world, think it incumbent to demonstrate that

complaisance to inferiors, common manners, common equity, or any thing

common, is quite beneath the attention or sphere--of a Gentleman.

"Now, as underlings are ever ambitious of imitating and usurping the

manners of their superiors; and as this state of mortality is incident

to perpetual change and revolution, it may happen, that when the

populace, by encroaching on the province of gentility, have arrived to

their _ne plus ultra_ of insolence, irreligion, &c.; the gentry, in

order to be again distinguished, may assume the station that their

inferiors had forsaken, and, however ridiculous the supposition may

appear at present, humanity, equity, utility, complaisance, and piety,

may in time come to be the distinguishing characteristics--of a

Gentleman.

"It appears that the most general idea which people have formed of a

Gentleman, is that of a person of fortune above the vulgar, and

embellished by manners that are fashionable in high life. In this case,

fortune and fashion are the two constituent ingredients in the

composition of modern Gentlemen; for whatever the fashion may be,

whether moral or immoral, for or against reason, right or wrong, it is

equally the duty of a Gentleman to conform. And yet I apprehend, that

true gentility is altogether independent of fortune or fashion, of time,

customs, or opinions of any kind. The very same qualities that

constituted a gentleman, in the first age of the world, are permanently,

invariably, and indispensably necessary to the constitution of the same

character to the end of time.

"Hector was the finest gentleman of whom we read in history, and Don

Quixote the finest gentleman we read of in romance; as was instanced

from the tenor of their principles and actions.

"Some time after the battle of Cressy, Edward the Third of England, and

Edward the Black Prince, the more than heir of his father's renown,

pressed John King of France to indulge them with the pleasure of his

company at London. John was desirous of embracing the invitation, and

accordingly laid the proposal before his parliament at Paris. The

parliament objected, that the invitation had been made with an insidious

design of seizing his person, thereby to make the cheaper and easier

acquisition of the crown, to which Edward at that time pretended. But

John replied, with some warmth, that he was confident his brother

Edward, and more especially his young cousin, were too much of the

GENTLEMAN, to treat him in that manner. He did not say too much of the

king, of the hero, or of the saint, but too much of the GENTLEMAN to be

guilty of any baseness.

"The sequel verified this opinion. At the battle of Poictiers King John

was made prisoner, and soon after conducted by the Black Prince to

England. The prince entered London in triumph, amid the throng and

acclamations of millions of the people. But then this rather appeared to

be the triumph of the French king than that of his conqueror. John was

seated on a proud steed, royally robed, and attended by a numerous and

gorgeous train of the British nobility; while his conqueror endeavored,

as much as possible, to disappear, and rode by his side in plain attire,

and degradingly seated on a little Irish hobby.

"As Aristotle and the Critics derived their rules for epic poetry and

the sublime from a poem which Homer had written long before the rules

were formed, or laws established for the purpose: thus, from the

demeanor and innate principles of particular gentlemen, art has borrowed

and instituted the many modes of behaviour, which the world has adopted,

under the title of good manners.

"One quality of a gentleman is that of charity to the poor; and this is

delicately instanced in the account which Don Quixote gives, to his fast

friend Sancho Pancha, of the valorous but yet more pious knight-errant

Saint Martin. On a day, said the Don, Saint Martin met a poor man half

naked, and taking his cloak from his shoulders, he divided, and gave him

the one half. Now, tell me at what time of the year this happened. Was I

a witness? quoth, Sancho; how the vengeance should I know in what year

or what time of the year it happened? Hadst thou Sancho, rejoined the

knight, anything within thee of the sentiment of Saint Martin, thou must

assuredly have known that this happened in winter; for, had it been

summer, Saint Martin would had given the whole cloak.

"Another characteristic of the true gentleman, is a delicacy of

behaviour toward that sex whom nature has entitled to the protection,

and consequently entitled to the tenderness, of man.

"The same gentleman-errant, entering into a wood on a summer's evening,

found himself entangled among nets of green thread that, here and there,

hung from tree to tree; and conceiving it some matter of purposed

conjuration, pushed valorously forward to break through the enchantment.

Hereupon some beautiful shepherdesses interposed with a cry, and

besought him to spare the implements of their innocent recreation. The

knight, surprised and charmed by the vision, replied,--Fair creatures!

my province is to protect, not to injure; to seek all means of service,

but never of offence, more especially to any of your sex and apparent

excellences. Your pretty nets take up but a small piece of favored

ground; but, did they inclose the world, I would seek out new worlds,

whereby I might win a passage, rather than break them.

"Two very lovely but shamefaced girls had a cause, of some consequence,

depending at Westminster, that indispensably required their personal

appearance. They were relations of Sir Joseph Jeckel, and, on this

tremendous occasion, requested his company and countenance at the court.

Sir Joseph attended accordingly; and the cause being opened, the judge

demanded whether he was to entitle those ladies by the denomination of

spinsters. 'No, my Lord,' said Sir Joseph; 'they are lilies of the

valley, they toil not, neither do they spin, yet you see that no

monarch, in all his glory, was ever arrayed like one of these.'

"Another very peculiar characteristic of a gentleman is, the giving

place and yielding to all with whom he has to do. Of this we have a

shining and affecting instance in Abraham, perhaps the most accomplished

character that may be found in history, whether sacred or profane. A

contention had arisen between the herdsmen of Abraham and the herdsmen

of his nephew, Lot, respecting the propriety of the pasture of the

lands wherein they dwelled, that could now scarce contain the abundance

of their cattle. And those servants, as is universally the case, had

respectively endeavored to kindle and inflame their masters with their

own passions. When Abraham, in consequence of this, perceived that the

countenance of Lot began to change toward him, he called, and generously

expostulated with him as followeth: 'Let there be no strife, I pray

thee, between me and thee, or between my herdsmen and thy herdsmen; for

we be brethren. If it be thy desire to separate thyself from me, is not

the whole land before thee? If thou wilt take the left hand, then will I

go to the right; or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to

the left.'

"Another capital quality of the true gentleman is, that of feeling

himself concerned and interested in others. Never was there so

benevolent, so affecting, so pathetic a piece of oratory exhibited upon

earth, as that of Abraham's pleading with God for averting the judgments

that then impended over Sodom. But the matter is already so generally

celebrated, that I am constrained to refer my reader to the passage at

full; since the smallest abridgment must deduct from its beauties, and

that nothing can be added to the excellences thereof.

"Honor, again, is said, in Scripture, peculiarly to distinguish the

character of a gentleman; where it is written of Sechem, the son of

Hamor, 'that he was more honorable than all the house of his father.'

"From hence it may be inferred, that human excellence, or human

amiableness, doth not so much consist in a freedom from frailty as in

our recovery from lapses, our detestation of our own transgressions,

and our desire of atoning, by all possible means, the injuries we have

done, and the offences we have given. Herein, therefore, may consist the

very singular distinction which the great apostle makes between his

estimation of a just and of a good man. 'For a just or righteous man,'

says he, 'one would grudge to die; but for a good man one would even

dare to die.' Here the just man is supposed to adhere strictly to the

rule of right or equity, and to exact from others the same measure that

he is satisfied to mete; but the good man, though occasionally he may

fall short of justice, has, properly speaking, no measure to his

benevolence, his general propensity is to give more than the due. The

just man condemns, and is desirous of punishing the transgressors of the

line prescribed to himself; but the good man, in the sense of his own

falls and failings, gives latitude, indulgence, and pardon to others; he

judges, he condemns no one save himself. The just man is a stream that

deviates not to the right or left from its appointed channel, neither is

swelled by the flood of passion above its banks; but the heart of the

good man, the man of honor, the gentleman, is as a lamp lighted by the

breath of GOD, and none save GOD himself can set limits to the efflux or

irradiations thereof.

"Again, the gentleman never envies any superior excellence, but grows

himself more excellent, by being the admirer, promoter, and lover

thereof. Saul said to his son Jonathan, 'Thou son of the perverse,

rebellious woman, do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse

to thine own confusion? For as long as the son of Jesse liveth upon the

ground, thou shalt not be established, nor thy kingdom; wherefore send

and fetch him unto me, for he shall surely die.' Here every interesting

motive that can possibly be conceived to have an influence on man,

united to urge Jonathan to the destruction of David; he would thereby

have obeyed his king, and pacified a father who was enraged against him.

He would thereby have removed the only luminary that then eclipsed the

brightness of his own achievements. And he saw, as his father said, that

the death of David alone could establish the kingdom in himself and his

posterity. But all those considerations were of no avail to make

Jonathan swerve from honor, to slacken the bands of his faith, or cool

the warmth of his friendship. O Jonathan! the sacrifice which thou then

madest to virtue, was incomparably more illustrious in the sight of God

and his angels than all the subsequent glories to which David attained.

What a crown was thine, 'Jonathan, when thou wast slain in thy high

places!'

"Saul of Tarsus had been a man of bigotry, blood, and violence; making

havoc, and breathing out threatenings and slaughter, against all who

were not of his own sect and persuasion. But, when the spirit of that

INFANT, who laid himself in the manger of human flesh, came upon him, he

acquired a new heart and a new nature; and he offered himself a willing

subject to all the sufferings and persecutions which he had brought upon

others.

"Saul from that time, exemplified in his own person, all those qualities

of the gentleman, which he afterwards specifies in his celebrated

description of that charity, which, as he says, alone endureth forever.

When Festus cried with a loud voice, 'Paul, thou art beside thyself,

much learning doth make thee mad;' Paul stretched the hand, and

answered, 'I am not mad, most noble Festus, but speak forth the words of

truth and soberness. For the king knoweth of these things, before whom

also I speak freely; for I am persuaded that none of these things are

hidden from him. King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that

thou believest.' Then Agrippa said unto Paul, 'Almost thou persuadest me

to be a Christian.' And Paul said, 'I would to God that not only thou,

but also all that hear me this day, were not only almost but altogether

such as I am,--except these bonds.' Here, with what an inimitable

elegance did this man, in his own person, at once sum up the orator, the

saint, and the gentleman!

"From these instances, my friend, you must have seen that the character,

or rather quality of a GENTLEMAN, does not, in any degree, depend on

fashion or mode, on station or opinion; neither changes with customs,

climate, or ages. But, as the Spirit of God can alone inspire it into

man, so it is, as God is the same, yesterday, to-day, and forever."

In concluding this chapter I would say:

"In the common actions and transactions of life, there is a wide

distinction between the well-bred and the ill-bred. If a person of the

latter sort be in a superior condition in life, his conduct towards

those below him, or dependent upon him, is marked by haughtiness, or by

unmannerly condescension. In the company of his equals in station and

circumstances, an ill-bred man is either captious and quarrelsome, or

offensively familiar. He does not consider that:

'The man who hails you Tom or Jack,

And proves, by thumps upon your back,

How he esteems your merit,

Is such a friend, that one had need

Be very much a friend indeed,

To pardon or to bear it.'

"And if a man void of good breeding have to transact business with a

superior in wealth or situation, it is more than likely that he will be

needlessly humble, unintentionally insolent, or, at any rate, miserably

embarrassed. On the contrary, a well-bred person will instinctively

avoid all these errors. 'To inferiors, he will speak kindly and

considerately, so as to relieve them from any feeling of being beneath

him in circumstances. To equals, he will be plain, unaffected, and

courteous. To superiors, he will know how to show becoming respect,

without descending to subserviency or meanness. In short, he will act a

manly, inoffensive, and agreeable part, in all the situations in life in

which he may be placed.'"

The Gentlemen's Book of Etiquette and Manual of Politeness Being a Complete Guide for a Gentleman's Conduct in All His Relations Towards Society · 第 2 / 18 章