Many organic substances[27] on being heated, or under the action of

various agents, yield carbonic oxide; amongst these are many organic

or carboxylic acids. The simplest are formic and oxalic acids. Formic

acid, CH_{2}O_{2}, on being heated to 200°, easily decomposes into

carbonic oxide and water, CH_{2}O_{2} = CO + H_{2}O.[27 bis] Usually,

however, carbonic oxide is prepared in laboratories, not from formic

but from oxalic acid, C_{2}H_{2}O_{4}, the more so as formic acid is

itself prepared from oxalic acid. The latter acid is easily obtained by

the action of nitric acid on starch, sugar, &c.; it is also found in

nature. Oxalic acid is easily decomposed by heat; its crystals first

lose water, then partly volatilise, but the greater part is decomposed.

The decomposition is of the following nature: it splits up into water,

carbonic oxide, and carbonic anhydride,[28] C_{2}H_{2}O_{4} = H_{2}O

+ CO_{2} + CO. This decomposition is generally practically effected

by mixing oxalic acid with strong sulphuric acid, because the latter

assists the decomposition by taking up the water. On heating a mixture

of oxalic and sulphuric acids a mixture of carbonic oxide and carbonic

anhydride is evolved. This mixture is passed through a solution of an

alkali in order to absorb the carbonic anhydride, whilst the carbonic

oxide passes on.[28 bis]

[27] The so-called yellow prussiate, K_{4}FeC_{6}N_{6}, on being heated

with ten parts of strong sulphuric acid forms a considerable

quantity of very pure carbonic oxide quite free from carbonic

anhydride.

[27 bis] To perform this reaction, the formic acid is mixed with

glycerine, because when heated alone it volatilises much below its

temperature of decomposition. When heated with sulphuric acid the

salts of formic acid yield carbonic oxide.

[28] The decomposition of formic and oxalic acids, with the formation

of carbonic oxide, considering these acids as carboxyl

derivatives, may be explained as follows:--The first is H(COOH)

and the second (COOH)_{2}, or H_{2} in which one or both halves of

the hydrogen are exchanged for carboxyl; therefore they are equal

to H_{2} + CO_{2} and H_{2} + 2CO_{2}; but H_{2} reacts with

CO_{2}, as has been stated above, forming CO and H_{2}O. From this

it is also evident that oxalic acid on losing CO_{2} forms formic

acid, and also that the latter may proceed from CO + H_{2}O, as we

shall see further on.

[28 bis] Greshoff (1888) showed that with a solution of nitrate of

silver, iodoform, CHI_{3}, forms CO according to the equation

CHI_{3} + 3AgNO_{3} + H_{2}O = 3AgI + 3HNO_{3} + CO. The reaction

is immediate and is complete.

In its physical _properties_ carbonic oxide resembles nitrogen; this is

explained by the equality of their molecular weights. The absence of

colour and smell, the low temperature of the absolute boiling point,

-140° (nitrogen, -146°), the property of solidifying at -200°

(nitrogen, -202°), the boiling point of -190° (nitrogen, -203°), and the

slight solubility (Chapter I., Note 30), of carbonic oxide are almost the

same as in those of nitrogen. The chemical properties of both gases are,

however, very different, and in these carbonic oxide resembles hydrogen.

Carbonic oxide burns with a blue flame, giving 2 volumes of carbonic

anhydride from 2 volumes of carbonic oxide, just as 2 volumes of hydrogen

give 2 volumes of aqueous vapour. It explodes with oxygen, in the

eudiometer, like hydrogen.[29] When breathed it acts as a strong poison,

being absorbed by the blood;[30] this explains the action of charcoal

fumes, the products of the incomplete combustion of charcoal and other

carbonaceous fuels. Owing to its faculty of combining with oxygen,

carbonic oxide acts as a powerful reducing agent, taking up the oxygen

from many compounds at a red heat, and being itself transformed into

carbonic anhydride. The reducing action of carbonic oxide, however, is

(like that of hydrogen, Chapter II.) naturally confined to those oxides

which easily part with their oxygen--as, for instance, copper

oxide--whilst the oxides of magnesium or potassium are not reduced.

Metallic iron itself is capable of reducing carbonic anhydride to

carbonic oxide, just as it liberates the hydrogen from water. Copper,

which does not decompose water, does not decompose carbonic oxide. If a

platinum wire heated to 300°, or spongy platinum at the ordinary

temperature, be plunged into a mixture of carbonic oxide and oxygen, or

of hydrogen and oxygen, the mixture explodes. These reactions are very

similar to those peculiar to hydrogen. The following important

distinction, however, exists between them--namely: the molecule of

hydrogen is composed of H_{2}, a group of elements divisible into two

like parts, whilst, as the molecule of carbonic oxide, CO, contains

unlike atoms of carbon and oxygen, in none of its reactions of

combination can it give two molecules of matter containing its elements.

This is particularly noticeable in the action of chlorine on hydrogen and

on carbonic oxide respectively; with the former chlorine forms hydrogen

chloride, and with the latter it produces the so-called carbonyl

chloride, COCl_{2}: that is to say, the molecule of hydrogen, H_{2},

under the action of chlorine divides, forming two molecules of

hydrochloric acid, whilst the molecule of carbonic oxide enters in its

entirety into the molecule of carbonyl chloride. This characterises the

so-called _diatomic_ or _bivalent_ reactions of radicles or _residues_.

H is a monatomic residue or radicle, like K, Cl, and others, whilst

carbonic oxide, CO, is an indivisible (undecomposable) bivalent radicle,

equivalent to H_{2} and not to H, and therefore combining with X_{2} and

interchangeable with H_{2}. This distinction is evident from the annexed

comparison:

HH, hydrogen. CO, carbonic oxide.

HCl, hydrochloric acid. COCl_{2}, carbonyl chloride.

HKO, potash. CO(KO)_{2}, potassium carbonate.

HNH_{2}, ammonia. CO(NH_{2})_{2}, urea.

HCH_{3}, methane. CO(CH_{3})_{2}, acetone.

HHO, water. CO(HO)_{2}, carbonic acid.

[29] It is remarkable that, according to the investigations of Dixon,

perfectly dry carbonic oxide does not explode with oxygen when a

spark of low intensity is used, but an explosion takes place if

there is the slightest admixture of moisture. L. Meyer, however,

showed that sparks of an electric discharge of considerable

intensity produce an explosion. N. N. Beketoff demonstrated that

combustion proceeds and spreads slowly unless there be perfect

dryness. I think that this may he explained by the fact that water

with carbonic oxide gives carbonic anhydride and hydrogen, but

hydrogen with oxygen gives hydrogen peroxide (Chapter VII.), which

with carbonic oxide forms carbonic anhydride and water. The water,

therefore, is renewed, and again serves the same purpose. But it

may be that here it is necessary to acknowledge a simple contact

influence. After Dixon had shown the influence of traces of

moisture upon the reaction CO + O, many researches were made of a

similar nature. The fullest investigation into the influence of

moisture upon the course of many chemical reactions was made by

Baker in 1894. He showed that with perfect dryness, many chemical

transformations (for example, the formation of ozone from oxygen,

the decomposition of AgO, KClO_{3} under the action of heat, &c.)

proceeds in exactly the same manner as in the presence of

moisture; but that in many cases traces of moisture have an

evident influence. We may mention the following instances: (1) Dry

SO_{3} does not act upon dry CaO or CuO; (2) perfectly dry

sal-ammoniac does not give NH_{3} with dry CaO, but simply

volatilises; (3) dry NO and O do not react; (4) perfectly dry

NH_{3} and HCl do not combine; (5) perfectly dry sal-ammoniac does

not dissociate at 350° (Chapter VII., Note 15 bis); and (6)

perfectly dry chlorine does not act upon metals, &c.

[30] Carbonic oxide is very rapid in its action, because it is absorbed

by the blood in the same way as oxygen. In addition to this, the

absorption spectrum of the blood changes so that by the help of

blood it is easy to detect the slightest traces of carbonic oxide

in the air. M. A. Kapoustin found that linseed oil and therefore

oil paints, are capable of giving off carbonic oxide while drying

(absorbing oxygen).

Such monatmic (univalent) residues, X, as H, Cl, Na, NO_{2}, NH_{4},

CH_{3}, CO_{2}H (carboxyl), OH, and others, in accordance with

the law of substitution, combine together, forming compounds, XX';

and with oxygen, or in general with diatomic (bivalent) residues,

Y--for instance, O, CO, CH_{2}, S, Ca, &c. forming compounds XX´Y; but

diatomic residues, Y, sometimes capable of existing separately may

combine together, forming YY´ and with X_{2} or XX´, as we see from

the transition of CO into CO_{2} and COCl_{2}. This combining power of

carbonic oxide appears in many of its reactions. Thus it is very easily

absorbed by cuprous chloride, CuCl, dissolved in fuming hydrochloric

acid, forming a crystalline compound, COCu_{2}Cl_{2},2H_{2}O,

decomposable by water; it combines directly with potassium (at 90°),

forming (KCO)_{_n_}[31] with platinum dichloride, PtCl_{2}, with

chlorine, Cl_{2}, &c.

[31] The molecule of metallic potassium (Scott, 1887), like that of

mercury, contains only one atom, and it is probably in virtue of

this that the molecules CO and K combine together. But as in the

majority of cases potassium acts as a univalent radicle, the

polymeride K_{2}C_{2}O_{2} is formed, and probably

K_{10}C_{10}O_{10}, because products containing C_{10} are formed

by the action of hydrochloric acid. The black mass formed by the

combination of carbonic oxide with potassium explodes with great

ease, and oxidises in the air. Although Brodie, Lerch, and Joannis

(who obtained it in 1873 in a colourless form by means of NH_{3}K,

described in Chapter VI., Note 14) have greatly extended our

knowledge of this compound, much still remains unexplained. It

probably exists in various polymeric and isomeric forms, having

the composition (KCO)_{_n_} and (NaCO)_{_n_}.

But the most remarkable compounds are (1) the compound of CO with

metallic nickel, a colourless volatile liquid, Ni(CO)_{4}, obtained by

L. Mond (described in Chapter XXII.) and (2) the compounds of carbonic

oxide with the alkalis, for instance with potassium or barium hydroxide,

&c.--although it is not directly absorbed by them, as it has no acid

properties. Berthelot (1861) showed that potash in the presence of water

is capable of absorbing carbonic oxide, but the absorption takes place

slowly, little by little, and it is only after being heated for many

hours that the whole of the carbonic oxide is absorbed by the potash. The

salt CHKO_{2} is obtained by this absorption; it corresponds with an acid

found in nature--namely, the simplest organic (carboxylic) acid, _formic

acid_, CH_{2}O_{2}. It can be extracted from the potassium salt by means

of distillation with dilute sulphuric acid, just as nitric acid is

prepared from sodium nitrate. The same acid is found in ants and in

nettles (when the stings of the nettles puncture the skin they break, and

the corrosive formic acid enters into the body); it is also obtained

during the action of oxidising agents on many organic substances; it is

formed from oxalic acid, and under many conditions splits up into

carbonic oxide and water. In the formation of formic acid from carbonic

oxide we observe an example of the synthesis of organic compounds, such

as are now very numerous, and are treated of in detail in works on

organic chemistry.

Formic acid, H(CHO_{2}), carbonic acid, HO(CHO_{2}), and oxalic acid,

(CHO_{2})_{2}, are the simple organic or carboxylic acids, R(CHO_{2})

corresponding with HH and HOH. Commencing with carbonic oxide, CO, the

formation of carboxylic acids is clearly seen from the fact that CO is

capable of combining with X_{2}, that is of forming COX_{2}. If, for

instance, one X is an aqueous residue, OH (hydroxyl), and the other X

is hydrogen, then the simplest organic acid--formic acid, H(COOH)--is

obtained. As all hydrocarbons (Chapter VIII.) correspond with the

simplest, CH_{4}, so all organic acids may be considered to proceed from

formic acid.

In a similar way it is easy to explain the relation to other compounds

of carbon of those compounds which contain nitrogen. By way of an

example, we will take one of the carboxyl acids, R(CO_{2}H), where R is

a hydrocarbon radicle (residue). Such an acid, like all others, will

give by combination with NH_{3} an ammoniacal salt, R(CO_{2}NH_{4}).

This salt contains the elements for the formation of two molecules of

water, and under suitable conditions by the action of bodies capable

of taking it up, water may in fact be separated from R(CO_{2}NH_{4}),

forming by the loss of one molecule of water, _amides_, RCONH_{2}, and

by the loss of two molecules of water, _nitriles_, RCN, otherwise known

as _cyanogen compounds_ or _cyanides_.[32] If all the carboxyl acids are

united not only by many common reactions but also by a mutual conversion

into each other (an instance of which we saw above in the conversion

of oxalic acid into formic and carbonic acids) one would expect the

same for all the cyanogen compounds also. The common character of

their reactions, and the reciprocity of their transformation, were

long ago observed by Gay-Lussac, who recognised a common group or

radicle (residue) cyanogen, CN, in all of them. The simplest compounds

are _hydrocyanic_ or _prussic acid_, HCN, cyanic acid, OHCN, and free

cyanogen, (CN)_{2}, which correspond to the three simplest carboxyl

acids: formic, HCO_{2}H, carbonic, OHCO_{2}H, and oxalic, (CO_{2}H)_{2}.

Cyanogen, like carboxyl, is evidently a monatomic residue and acid,

similar to chlorine. As regards the amides RCONH_{2}, corresponding

to the carboxyl acids, they contain the ammoniacal residue NH_{2},

and form a numerous class of organic compounds met with in nature and

obtained in many ways,[33] but not distinguished by such characteristic

peculiarities as the cyanogen compounds.

[32] The connection of the cyanogen compounds with the rest of the

hydrocarbons by means of carboxyl was enunciated by me, about the

year 1860, at the first Annual Meeting of the Russian Naturalists.

[33] Thus, for instance, _oxamide_, or the amide of oxalic acid,

(CNH_{2}O)_{2}, is obtained in the form of an insoluble

precipitate on adding a solution of ammonia to an alcoholic

solution of ethyl oxalate, (CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5})_{2}, which is formed

by the action of oxalic acid on alcohol: (CHO_{2})_{2} +

2(C_{2}H_{5})OH = 2HOH + (CO_{2}C_{2}H_{5})_{2}. As the nearest

derivatives of ammonia, the amides treated with alkalis yield

ammonia and form the salt of the acid. The nitriles do not,

however, give similar reactions so readily. The majority of amides

corresponding to acids have a composition RNH_{2}, and therefore

recombine with water with great ease even when simply boiled with

it, and with still greater facility in presence of acids or

alkalis. Under the action of alkalis the amides naturally give off

ammonia, through the combination of water with the amide, when a

salt of the acid from which the amide was derived is formed:

RNH_{2} + KHO = RKO + NH_{3}.

The same reaction takes place with acids, only an ammoniacal salt

of the acid is of course formed whilst the acid held in the amide

is liberated: RNH_{2} + HCl + H_{2}O = RHO + NH_{4}Cl.

Thus in the majority of cases amides easily pass into ammoniacal

salts, but they differ essentially from them. No ammoniacal salt

sublimes or volatilises unchanged, and generally when heated it

gives off water and yields an amide, whilst many amides volatilise

without alteration and frequently are volatile crystalline

substances which may be easily sublimed. Such, for instance, are

the amides of benzoic, formic, and many other organic acids.

The reactions and properties of the amides and nitriles of the organic

acids are described in detail in books on organic chemistry; we will here

only touch upon the simplest of them, and to clearly explain the

derivative compounds will first consider the ammoniacal salts and amides

of carbonic acid.

As carbonic acid is bibasic, its ammonium salts ought to have the

following composition: _acid carbonate of ammonium_, H(NH_{4})CO_{3},

and _normal carbonate_, (NH_{4})_{2}CO_{3}; they represent compounds

of one or two molecules of ammonia with carbonic acid. The acid salt

appears in the form of a non-odoriferous and (when tested with litmus)

neutral substance, soluble at the ordinary temperature in six parts

of water, insoluble in alcohol, and obtainable in a crystalline form

either without water of crystallisation or with various proportions

of it. If an aqueous solution of ammonia be saturated with an excess

of carbonic anhydride, and then evaporated over sulphuric acid in

the bell jar of an air-pump, crystals of this salt are separated.

Solutions of all other ammonium carbonates, when evaporated under

the air-pump, yield crystals of this salt. A solution of this salt,

even at the ordinary temperature, gives off carbonic anhydride, as do

all the acid salts of carbonic acid (for instance, NaHCO_{3}), and

at 38° the separation of carbonic anhydride takes place with great

rapidity. _On losing carbonic anhydride_ and water, the acid salt is

converted into the normal salt, 2(NH_{4})HCO_{3} = H_{2}O + CO_{2} +

(NH_{4})2CO_{3}; the latter, however, decomposes in solution, and can

therefore only be obtained in crystals, (NH_{4})_{2}CO_{3},H_{2}O, at

low temperatures, and from solutions containing _an excess of ammonia_

as the product of dissociation of this salt: (NH_{4})_{2}CO_{3} = NH_{3}

+ (NH_{4})HCO_{3}. But the normal salt,[34] according to the general

type, is capable of decomposing _with separation of water_, and forming

_ammonium carbamate_, NH_{4}O(CONH_{2}) = (NH_{4})_{2}CO_{3}-H_{2}O;

this still further complicates the chemical transformations of the

carbonates of ammonium. It is in fact evident that, by changing the

ratios of water, ammonia, and carbonic acid, various intermediate salts

will be formed containing mixtures or combinations of those mentioned

above. Thus the ordinary commercial _carbonate of ammonia_ is obtained

by heating a mixture of chalk and sulphate of ammonia (Chapter VI.),

or sal-ammoniac, 2NH_{4}Cl + CaCO_{3} = CaCl_{2} + (NH_{4})_{2}CO_{3}.

The normal salt, however, through loss of part of the ammonia, partly

forms the acid salt, and, partly through loss of water, forms carbamate,

and most frequently presents the composition NH_{4}O(CONH_{2}) +

2OH(CO_{2}NH_{4}) = 4NH_{3} + 3CO_{2} + 2H_{2}O. This salt, in parting

under various conditions with ammonia, carbonic anhydride, and water,

does not present a constant composition, and ought rather to be regarded

as a mixture of acid salt and amide salt. The latter must be recognised

as entering into the composition of the ordinary carbonate of ammonia,

because it contains less water than is required for the normal or acid

salt;[35] but on being dissolved in water this salt gives a mixture of

acid and normal salts.

[34] The acid salt, (NH_{4})HCO_{3}, on losing water ought to form the

_carbamic acid_, OH(CNH_{2}O); but it is not formed, which is

accounted for by the instability of the acid salt itself. Carbonic

anhydride is given off and ammonia is produced, which gives

ammonium carbamate.

[35] In the normal salt, 2NH_{3} + CO_{2} + H_{2}O, in the acid salt,

NH_{3} + CO_{2} + H_{2}O, but in the commercial salt only 2H_{2}O

to 3CO_{2}.

Each of the two ammoniacal salts of carbonic acid has its corresponding

amide. That of the acid salt should be acid, if the water given off takes

up the hydrogen of the ammonia, as it should according to the common type

of formation of the amides, so that OHCONH_{2}, or _carbamic acid_, is

formed from OHCO_{3}NH_{4}. This acid is not known in a free state, but

its corresponding ammoniacal salt or _ammonium carbamate_ is known. The

latter is easily and immediately formed by mixing 2 volumes of _dry_

ammonia with 1 volume of dry carbonic anhydride, 2NH_{3} + CO_{2} =

NH_{4}O(CONH_{2}); it is a solid substance, smells strongly of ammonia,

attracts moisture from the air, and decomposes completely at 60°. The

fact of this decomposition may be proved[36] by the density of its

vapour, which = 13 (H = 1); this exactly corresponds with the density of

a mixture of 2 volumes of ammonia and 1 volume of carbonic anhydride. It

is easily understood that such a combination will take place with any

ammonium carbonate under the action of salts which take up the water--for

instance, sodium or potassium carbonate[37]--as in an anhydrous state

ammonia and carbonic anhydride only form one compound, CO_{2}2NH_{3}.[38]

As the normal ammonium carbonate contains two ammonias, and as the amides

are formed with the separation of water at the expense of the hydrogen of

the ammonias, so this salt has its symmetrical amide, CO(NH_{2})_{2}.

This must be termed carbamide. It is identical with urea, CN_{2}H_{4}O,

which, contained in the urine (about 2 per cent. in human urine), is for

the higher animals (especially the carnivorous) the ordinary product of

excretion[39] and oxidation of the nitrogenous substances found in the

organism. If ammonium carbamate be heated to 140° (in a sealed tube,

Bazaroff), or if carbonyl chloride, COCl_{2}, be treated with ammonia

(Natanson), urea will be obtained, which shows its direct connection with

carbonic acid--that is, the presence of carbonic acid and ammonia in it.

From this it will be understood how urea during the putrefaction of urine

is converted into ammonium carbonate, CN_{2}H_{4}O + H_{2}O = CO_{2} +

2NH_{3}.

[36] Naumann determined the following dissociation tensions of

the vapour of ammonium carbamate (in millimetres of mercury):--

-10° 0° +10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60°

5 12 30 62 124 248 470 770

Horstmann and Isambert studied the tensions corresponding to

excess of NH_{3} or CO_{2}, and found, as might have been

expected, that with such excess the mass of the salt formed (in a

solid state) increases and the decomposition (transition into

vapour) decreases.

[37] Calcium chloride enters into double decomposition with ammonium

carbamate. Acids (for instance, sulphuric) take up ammonia, and

set free carbonic anhydride; whilst alkalis (such as potash) take

up carbonic anhydride and set free ammonia, and therefore, in this

case for removing water only sodium or potassium carbonate can be

taken. An aqueous solution of ammonium carbamate does not entirely

precipitate a solution of CaCl_{2}, probably because calcium

carbamate is soluble in water, and all the (NH_{3})_{2}CO_{2} is

not converted by dissolving into the normal salt,

(NH_{4}O)_{2}CO_{3}.

[38] It must be imagined that the reaction takes place at first between

equal volumes (Chapter VII.); but then carbamic acid,

HO(CNH_{2}O), is produced, which, as an acid, immediately combines

with the ammonia, forming NH_{4}O(CNH_{2}O).

[39] Urea is undoubtedly a product of the oxidation of complex

nitrogenous matters (albumin) of the animal body. It is found in

the blood. It is absorbed from the blood by the kidneys. A man

excretes about 30 grams of urea per day. As a derivative of

carbonic anhydride, into which it is readily converted, urea is in

a sense a product of oxidation.

Thus urea, both by its origin and decomposition, is an amide of carbonic

acid. Representing as it does ammonia (two molecules) in which hydrogen

(two atoms) is replaced by the bivalent radicle of carbonic acid, urea

retains the property of ammonia of entering into combination, with acids

(thus nitric acid forms CN_{2}H_{4}O,HNO_{3}), with bases (for instance,

with mercury oxide), and with salts (such as sodium chloride, ammonium

chloride), but containing an acid residue it has no alkaline properties.

It is soluble in water without change, but at a red heat loses ammonia

and forms _cyanic acid_, CNHO,[39 bis] which is a nitrile of carbonic

acid--that is to say, is a cyanogen compound, corresponding to the acid

ammonium carbonate, OH(CNH_{4}O_{2}), which on parting with 2H_{2}O ought

to form cyanic acid, CNOH. Liquid cyanic acid, exceedingly unstable at

the ordinary temperatures, gives its stable solid polymer cyanuric acid,

O_{3}H_{3}C_{3}N_{3}. Both have the same composition, and they pass one

into another at different temperatures. If crystals of cyanuric acid be

heated to a temperature, _t_°, then the vapour tension, _p_, in

millimetres of mercury (Troost and Hautefeuille) will be:

_t._ 160°, 170°, 200°, 250°, 300°, 350°

_p._ 56, 68, 130, 220, 430, 1,200

The vapour contains cyanic acid, and, if it be rapidly cooled, it

condenses into a mobile volatile liquid (specific gravity at 0° =

1·14). If the liquid cyanic acid be gradually heated, it passes into

a new amorphous polymeride (cyamelide), which, on being heated, like

cyanuric acid, forms vapours of cyanic acid. If these fumes are heated

above 150° they pass directly into cyanuric acid. Thus at a temperature

of 350°, the pressure does not rise above 1,200 mm. on the addition of

vapours of cyanic acid, because the whole excess is transformed into

cyanuric acid. Hence, the above-mentioned figures give the tension

of dissociation of cyanuric acid, or the greatest pressure which the

vapours of HOCN are able to attain at a given temperature, whilst at

a greater pressure, or by the introduction of a larger mass of the

substance into a given volume, the whole of the excess is converted into

cyanuric acid. The properties of cyanic acid which we have described

were principally observed by Wöhler, and clearly show the _faculty of

polymerisation of cyanogen compounds_. This is observed in many other

cyanogen derivatives, and is to be regarded as the consequence of the

above-mentioned explanation of their nature. All cyanogen compounds are

ammonium salts, R(CNH_{4}O_{2}), deprived of water, 2H_{2}O; therefore

the molecules, RCN, ought to possess the faculty of combining with two

molecules of water or with other molecules in exchange for it (for

instance, with H_{2}S, or HCl, or 2H_{2}, &c.), and are therefore

capable of combining together. The combination of molecules of the same

kind to form more complex ones is what is meant by polymerisation.[40]

[39 bis] Its polymer, C_{3}N_{3}H_{3}O_{3}, is formed together

with it. Cyanic acid is a very unstable, easily changeable liquid,

while cyanuric acid is a crystalline solid which is very stable at

the ordinary temperature.

[40] Just as the aldehydes (such as C_{2}H_{4}O) are alcohols (like

C_{2}H_{6}O) which have lost hydrogen and are also capable of

entering into combination with many substances, and of

polymerising, forming slightly volatile polymerides, which

depolymerise on heating. Although there are also many similar

phenomena (for instance, the transformation of yellow into red

phosphorus, the transition of cinnamene into metacinnamene, &c.)

of polymerisation, in no other case are they so clearly and simply

expressed as in cyanic acid. The details relating to this must be

sought for in treatises on organic and theoretical chemistry. If

we touch on certain sides of this question it is principally with

the view of showing the phenomenon of polymerisation by typical

examples, for it is of more frequent occurrence than was formerly

supposed among compounds of several elements.

Besidea being a substance very prone to form polymerides, cyanic acid

presents many other features of interest, expounded in greater detail in

organic chemistry. However we may mention here the production of the

cyanates by the oxidation of the metallic cyanides. Potassium cyanate,

KCNO, is most often obtained in this way. Solutions of cyanates by the

addition of sulphuric acid yield cyanic acid, which, however, immediately

decomposes: CNHO + H_{2}O = CO_{2} + NH_{3}. A solution of ammonium

cyanate, CN(NH_{4})O, behaves in the same manner, but only in the cold.

On being heated it completely changes because it is transformed into

urea. The composition of both substances is identical, CN_{2}H_{4}O, but

the structure, or disposition of, and connection between, the elements is

different: in the ammonium cyanate one atom of nitrogen exists in the

form of cyanogen, CN--that is, united with carbon--and the other as

ammonium, NH_{4}, but, as cyanic acid contains the hydroxyl radicle of

carbonic acid, OH(CN), the ammonium in this salt is united with oxygen.

The composition of this salt is best expressed by supposing one atom of

the hydrogen in water to be replaced by ammonium and the other by

cyanogen--_i.e._ that its composition is not symmetrical--whilst in urea

both the nitrogen atoms are symmetrically and uniformly disposed as

regards the radicle CO of carbonic acid: CO(NH_{2})_{2}. For this reason,

urea is much more stable than ammonium cyanate, and therefore the latter,

on being slightly heated in solution, is converted into urea. This

remarkable isomeric transformation was discovered by Wöhler in 1828.[41]

Formamide, HCONH_{2}, and _hydrocyanic acid_, HCN, as a nitrile,

correspond with formic acid, HCOOH, and therefore ammonium formate,

HCOONH_{4}, and formamide, when acted on by heat and by substances which

take up water (phosphoric anhydride) form hydrocyanic acid, HCN, whilst,

under many conditions (for instance, on combining with hydrochloric acid

in presence of water), this hydrocyanic acid forms formic acid and

ammonia. Although containing hydrogen in the presence of two acid-forming

elements--namely, carbon and nitrogen[42]--hydrocyanic acid does not

give an acid reaction with litmus (cyanic acid has very marked acid

properties); _but it forms salts_, _MCN_, thus presenting the properties

of a feeble acid, and for this reason is called an _acid_. The small

amount of energy which it has is shown by the fact that the cyanides of

the alkali metals--for instance, potassium cyanide (KHO + HCN = H_{2}0 +

KCN) in solution have a strongly alkaline reaction.[43] If ammonia be

passed over charcoal at a red heat, especially in the presence of an

alkali, or if gaseous nitrogen be passed through a mixture of charcoal

and an alkali (especially potash, KHO), and also if a mixture of

nitrogenous organic substances and alkali be heated to a red heat, in all

these cases the alkali metal combines with the carbon and nitrogen,

forming a metallic cyanide, MCN--for example, KCN.[43 bis] Potassium

cyanide is much used in the arts, and is obtained, as above stated, under

many circumstances--as, for instance, in iron smelting, especially with

the assistance of wood charcoal, the ash of which contains much potash.

The nitrogen of the air, the alkali of the ash, and the charcoal are

brought into contact at a high temperature during iron smelting, and

therefore, under these conditions, a considerable quantity of potassium

cyanide is formed. In practice it is not usual to prepare potassium

cyanide directly, but a peculiar compound of it containing potassium,

iron, and cyanogen. This compound is potassium ferrocyanide, and is also

known as _yellow prussiate of potash_. This saline substance (_see_

Chapter XXII) has the composition K_{4}FeC_{6}N_{6} + 2H_{2}O. The name

of cyanogen ([Greek: kuanos]) is derived from the property which this

yellow prussiate possesses of forming, with a solution of a ferric salt,

FeX_{3}, the familiar pigment Prussian blue. The yellow prussiate is

manufactured on a large scale, and is generally used as the source of

the other cyanogen compounds.

[41] It has an important historical interest, more especially as at

that time such an easy preparation of substances occurring in

organisms without the aid of organic life was quite unexpected,

for they were supposed to be formed under the influence of the

forces acting in organisms, and without the latter their formation

was considered impossible. And in addition to destroying this

illusion, the easy transition of NH_{4}OCN into CO(NH_{2})_{2} is

the best example of the passage of one system of equilibrium of

atoms into another more stable system.

[42] If ammonia and methane (marsh gas) do not show any acid

properties, that is in all probability due to the presence of a

large amount of hydrogen in both; but in hydrocyanic acid one atom

of hydrogen is under the influence of two acid-forming elements.

Acetylene, C_{2}H_{2}, which contains but little hydrogen,

presents acid properties in certain respects, for its hydrogen is

easily replaced by metals. Hydronitrous acid, HN_{3}, which

contains little hydrogen, also has the properties of an acid.

[43] Solutions of cyanides--for instance, those of potassium or

barium--are decomposed by carbonic acid. Even the carbonic

anhydride of the air acts in a similar way, and for this reason

these solutions do not keep, because, in the first place, free

hydrocyanic acid itself decomposes and polymerises, and, in the

second place, with alkaline liquids it forms ammonia and formic

acid. Hydrocyanic acid does not liberate carbonic anhydride from

solutions of sodium or potassium carbonates. But a mixture of

solutions of potassium carbonate and hydrocyanic acid yields

carbonic anhydride on the addition of oxides like zinc oxide,

mercuric oxide, &c. This is due to the great inclination which the

cyanides exhibit of forming double salts. For instance,

ZnK_{2}(CN)_{4} is formed, which is a soluble double salt.

[43 bis] The conversion of the atmospheric nitrogen into cyanogen

compounds, although possible, has not yet been carried out on a

large scale, and one of the problems for future research should be

the discovery of a practical and economical means of converting

the atmospheric nitrogen into metallic cyanides, not only because

potassium cyanide has found a vast and important use for the

extraction of gold from even the poorest ores, but more especially

because the cyanides furnish the means for effecting the synthesis

of many complex carbon compounds, and the nitrogen contained in

cyanogen easily passes into other forms of combination such as

ammonia, which is of great importance in agriculture.

If four parts of yellow prussiate be mixed with eight parts of water and

three parts of sulphuric acid, and the mixture be heated, it decomposes,

volatile hydrocyanic acid separating. This was obtained for the first

time by Scheele in 1782, but it was only known to him in solution. In

1809 Ittner prepared anhydrous prussic acid, and in 1815 Gay-Lussac

finally settled its properties and showed that it contains only hydrogen,

carbon, and nitrogen, CNH. If the distillate (a weak solution of HCN) be

redistilled, and the first part collected, the anhydrous acid may be

prepared from this stronger solution. In order to do this, pieces of

calcium chloride are added to the concentrated solution, when the

anhydrous acid floats as a separate layer, because it is not soluble in

an aqueous solution of calcium chloride. If this layer be then distilled

over a new portion of calcium chloride at the lowest temperature

possible, the prussic acid may be obtained completely free from water. It

is, however, necessary to use the greatest caution in work of this kind,

because prussic acid, besides being extremely poisonous, is exceedingly

volatile.[44]

[44] The mixture of the vapours of water and hydrocyanic acid, evolved

on heating yellow prussiate with sulphuric acid, may be passed

directly through vessels or tubes filled with calcium chloride.

These tubes must be cooled, because, in the first place,

hydrocyanic acid easily changes on being heated, and, in the

second place, the calcium chloride when warm would absorb less

water. The mixture of hydrocyanic acid and aqueous vapour on

passing over a long layer of calcium chloride gives up water, and

hydrocyanic acid alone remains in the vapour. It ought to be

cooled as carefully as possible in order to bring it into a liquid

condition. The method which Gay-Lussac employed for obtaining pure

hydrocyanic acid consisted in the action of hydrochloric acid gas

on mercuric cyanide. The latter may he obtained in a pure state if

a solution of yellow prussiate be boiled with a solution of

mercuric nitrate, filtered, and crystallised by cooling; the

mercuric cyanide is then obtained in the form of colourless

crystals, Hg(CN)_{2}.

If a strong solution of hydrochloric acid be poured upon these

crystals, and the mixture of vapours evolved, consisting of

aqueous vapour, hydrochloric acid, and hydrocyanic acid, be passed

through a tube containing, first, marble (for absorbing the

hydrochloric acid), and then lumps of calcium chloride, on cooling

the hydrocyanic acid will be condensed. In order to obtain the

latter in an anhydrous form, the decomposition of heated mercury

cyanide by hydrogen sulphide may be made use of. Here the sulphur

and cyanogen change places, and hydrocyanic acid and mercury

sulphide are formed: Hg(CN)_{2} + H_{2}S = 2HCN + HgS.

Anhydrous prussic acid is a very mobile and volatile liquid; its specific

gravity is 0·697 at 18°; at lower temperatures, especially when mixed

with a small quantity of water, it easily congeals; it boils at 26°, and

therefore very easily evaporates, and at ordinary temperatures may be

regarded as a gas. An insignificant amount, when inhaled or brought into

contact with the skin, causes death. It is soluble in all proportions in

water, alcohol, and ether: weak aqueous solutions are used in

medicine.[45]

[45] A weak (up to 2 p.c.) aqueous solution of hydrocyanic acid is

obtained by the distillation of certain vegetable substances. The

so-called laurel water in particular enjoys considerable notoriety

from its containing hydrocyanic acid. It is obtained by the

steeping and distillation of laurel leaves. A similar kind of

water is formed by the infusion and distillation of bitter

almonds. It is well known that bitter almonds are poisonous, and

have a peculiar characteristic taste. This bitter taste is due to

the presence of a certain substance called amygdalin, which can be

extracted by alcohol. This amygdalin decomposes in an infusion of

bruised almonds, forming the so-called bitter almond oil, glucose,

and hydrocyanic acid:

C_{10}H_{27}NO_{11} + H_{2}O = C_{7}H_{6}O + CNH + 2C_{6}H_{12}O_{6}

Amygdalin in Water Bitter Hydrocyanic Glucose

bitter almonds almond acid

oil

If after this the infusion of bitter almonds be distilled with

water, the hydrocyanic acid and the volatile bitter almond oil are

carried over with the aqueous vapour. The oil is insoluble in

water, or only sparingly soluble, while the hydrocyanic acid

remains as an aqueous solution. Bitter almond water is similar to

laurel water, and is used like the former in medicine, naturally

only in small quantities because any considerable amount has

poisonous effects. Perfectly pure anhydrous hydrocyanic acid keeps

without change, just like the weak solutions, but the strong

solutions only keep in the presence of other acids. In the

presence of many admixtures these solutions easily give a brown

polymeric substance, which is also formed in a solution of

potassium cyanide.

The salts MCN--for instance, potassium, sodium,

ammonium--as well as the salts M´´(CN)_{2}--for example, barium,

calcium, mercury--are soluble in water, but the cyanides of manganese,

zinc, lead, and many others are insoluble in water. They form double

salts with potassium cyanide and similar metallic cyanides, an example

of which we will consider in a further description of the yellow

prussiate. Not only are some of the double salts remarkable for their

constancy and comparative stability, but so also are the soluble salt

HgC_{2}N_{2}, the insoluble silver cyanide AgCN, and even potassium

cyanide in the absence of water. The last salt,[46] when fused, acts

as a reducing agent with its elements K and C, and oxidises when fused

with lead oxide, forming potassium cyanate, KOCN, which establishes the

connection between HCN and OHCN--that is, between the nitriles of formic

and carbonic acids--and this connection is the same as that between

the acids themselves, since formic acid, on oxidation, yields carbonic

acid. Free cyanogen, (CN)_{2} or CNCN, corresponds to hydrocyanic acid

in the same manner as free chlorine, Cl_{2} or ClCl, corresponds to

hydrochloric acid. This composition, judging from what has been already

stated, exactly expresses that of the nitrile of oxalic acid, and, as

a matter of fact, oxalate of ammonia and the amide corresponding with

it (oxamide, Note 33), on being heated with phosphoric anhydride, which

takes up the water, yield _cyanogen_, (CN)_{2}. This substance is also

produced by simply heating some of the metallic cyanides. Mercuric

cyanide is particularly adapted for this purpose, because it is easily

obtained in a pure state and is then very stable. If mercuric cyanide be

heated, it decomposes, in like manner to mercury oxide, into metallic

mercury and cyanogen: HgC_{2}N_{2} = Hg + C_{2}N_{2}.[47] When cyanogen

is formed, part of it always polymerises into a dark brown insoluble

substance called _paracyanogen_, capable of forming cyanogen when

heated to redness.[48] Cyanogen is a colourless, poisonous gas, with a

peculiar smell and easily condensed by cooling into a colourless liquid,

insoluble in water and having a specific gravity of 0·86. It boils at

about -21°, and therefore cyanogen may be easily condensed into a liquid

by a strong freezing mixture. At -35° liquid cyanogen solidifies. The gas

is soluble in water and in alcohol to a considerable extent--namely,

1 volume of water absorbs as much as 4-1/2 volumes, and alcohol 23

volumes. Cyanogen resists the action of a tolerably high temperature

without decomposing, but under the action of the electric spark the

carbon is separated, leaving a volume of nitrogen equal to the volume

of the gas taken. As it contains carbon it burns, and the colour of the

flame is reddish-violet, which is due to the presence of nitrogen, all

compounds of which impart more or less of this reddish-violet hue to

the flame. During the combustion of cyanogen, carbonic anhydride and

nitrogen are formed. The same products are obtained in the eudiometer

with oxygen or by the action of cyanogen on many oxides at a red heat.

[46] This salt will be described in Chapter XIII.

[47] For the preparation it is necessary to take completely dry mercuric

cyanide, because when heated in the presence of moisture it gives

ammonia, carbonic anhydride, and hydrocyanic acid. Instead of

mercuric cyanide, a mixture of perfectly dry yellow prussiate and

mercuric chloride may be used, then double decomposition and the

formation of mercuric cyanide take place in the retort. Silver

cyanide also disengages cyanogen, on being heated.

[47] _Paracyanogen_ is a brown substance (having the composition of

cyanogen) which is formed during the preparation of cyanogen by

all methods, and remains as a residue. Silver cyanide, on being

slightly heated, fuses, and on being further heated evolves a gas;

a considerable quantity of paracyanogen remains in the residue.

Here it is remarkable that exactly half the cyanogen becomes

gaseous, and the other half is transformed into paracyanogen.

Metallic silver will be found in the residue with the

paracyanogen; it may be extracted with mercury or nitric acid,

which does not act on paracyanogen. If paracyanogen be heated in a

vacuum it decomposes, forming cyanogen; but here the pressure _p_

for a given temperature _t_ cannot exceed a certain limit, so that

the phenomenon presents all the external appearance of a physical

transformation into vapour; but, nevertheless, it is a complete

change in the nature of the substance, though limited by the

_pressure of dissociation_, as we saw before in the transformation

of cyanuric into hydrocyanic acid, and as would be expected from

the fundamental principles of dissociation. Troost and

Hautefeuille (1868) found that for paracyanogen,

_t_ = 530° 581° 600° 635°

_p_ = 90 143 296 1,089 mm.

However, even at 550° part of the cyanogen decomposes into carbon

and nitrogen. The reverse transition of cyanogen into paracyanogen

commences at 350°, and at 600° proceeds rapidly. And if the

transition of the first kind is likened to evaporation, then the

reverse transition, or polymerisation, presents a likeness to the

transition of vapours into the solid state.

The relation of cyanogen to the metallic cyanides is seen not only in the

fact that it is formed from mercuric cyanide, but also by its forming

cyanide of sodium or potassium on being heated with either of those

metals, the sodium or potassium taking fire in the cyanogen. On heating a

mixture of hydrogen and cyanogen to 500° (Berthelot),[49] or under the

action of the silent discharge (Boilleau), hydrocyanic acid is formed, so

that the reciprocity of the transitions does not leave any doubt in the

matter that all the nitriles of the organic acids contain cyanogen, just

as all the organic acids contain carboxyl and in it the elements of

carbonic anhydride. Besides the amides,[50] the nitriles (or cyanogen

compounds, RCN), and nitro-compounds (containing the radicle of nitric

acid, RNO_{2}), there are a great number of other substances containing

at the same time carbon and nitrogen, particulars of which must be sought

for in special works on organic chemistry.

[49] Cyanogen (like chlorine) is absorbed by a solution of sodium

hydroxide, sodium cyanide and cyanate being produced: C_{2}N_{2} +

2NaHO = NaCN + CNNaO + H_{2}O. But the latter salt decomposes

relatively easily, and moreover part of the cyanogen liberated by

heat from its compounds undergoes a more complex transformation.

[50] If, in general, compounds containing the radicle NH_{2} are called

amides, some of the _amines_ ought to be ranked with them; namely,

the hydrocarbons C_{_n_}H_{2_m_}, in which part of the hydrogen is

replaced by NH_{2}; for instance, methylamine, CH_{3}NH_{2},

aniline, C_{6}H_{5}NH_{2}, &c. In general the amines may be

represented as ammonia in which part or all of the hydrogen is

replaced by hydrocarbon radicles--as, for example, trimethylamine,

N(CH_{3})_{3}. They, like ammonia, combine with acids and form

crystalline salts. Analogous substances are sometimes met with in

nature, and bear the general name of _alkaloids_; such are, for

instance, quinine in cinchona bark, nicotine in tobacco, &c.

CHAPTER X

SODIUM CHLORIDE--BERTHOLLET'S LAWS--HYDROCHLORIC ACID

In the preceding chapters we have become acquainted with the most

important properties of the four elements, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen,

and carbon. They are sometimes termed the _organogens_, because

they enter into the composition of organic substances. Their mutual

combinations may serve as types for all other chemical compounds--that

is, they present the same atomic relations (types, forms, or grades of

combinations) as those in which the other elements also combine together.

Hydrogen, HH, or, in general, HR.

Water, H_{2}O, " " H_{2}R.

Ammonia, H_{3}N, " " H_{3}R.

Marsh gas, H_{4}C, " " H_{4}R.

One, two, three, and four atoms of hydrogen enter into these molecules

for one atom of another element. No compounds of one atom of oxygen with

three or four atoms of hydrogen are known; hence the atom of oxygen does

not possess certain properties which are found in the atoms of carbon

and nitrogen.

The faculty of an element to form a compound of definite composition

with hydrogen (or an element analogous to it) gives the possibility

of foretelling the composition of many other of its compounds. Thus,

if we know that an element, M, combines with hydrogen, forming, by

preference, a gaseous substance such as HM, but not forming H_{2}M,

H_{3}M, H_{n}M_{m}, then we must conclude, on the basis of the law of

substitution, that this element will give compounds M_{2}O, M_{3}N,

MHO, MH_{3}C, &c. Chlorine is an example of this kind. If we know

that another element, R, like oxygen, gives with hydrogen a molecule

H_{2}R, then we may expect that it will form compounds similar to

hydrogen peroxide, the metallic oxides, carbonic anhydride, or carbonic

oxide, and others. Sulphur is an instance of this kind. Hence the

elements may be classified according to their resemblance to hydrogen,

oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon, and in conformity with this analogy it

is possible to foretell, if not the properties (for example, the

acidity or basicity), at any rate the composition,[1] of some of their

compounds. This forms the substance of _the conception of the valency

or atomicity of the elements_. Hydrogen is taken as the representative

of the univalent elements, giving compounds, RH, R(OH), R_{2}O, RCl,

R_{3}N, R_{4}C, &c. Oxygen, in that form in which it gives water, is the

representative of the bivalent elements, forming RH_{2}, RO, RCl_{2},

RHCl, R(OH)Cl, R(OH)_{2}, R_{2}C, RCN, &c. Nitrogen in ammonia is the

representative of the trivalent elements, giving compounds RH_{3},

R_{2}O_{3}, R(OH)_{3}, RCl_{3}, RN, RHC, &c. In carbon are exemplified

the properties of the quadrivalent elements, forming RH_{4}, RO_{2},

RO(OH)_{2}, R(OH)_{4}, RHN, RCl_{4}, RHCl_{3}, &c. We meet with these

_forms of combination_, or degrees of union of atoms, in all other

elements, some being analogous to hydrogen, others to oxygen, and others

to nitrogen or to carbon. But besides these quantitative analogies or

resemblances, which are foretold by the law of substitution (Chapter

VI.), there exist among the elements qualitative analogies and relations

which are not fully seen in the compounds of the elements which have

been considered, but are most distinctly exhibited in the formation of

bases, acids, and salts of different types and properties. Therefore,

for a complete study of the nature of the elements and their compounds

it is especially important to become acquainted with the salts, as

substances of a peculiar character, and with the corresponding acids and

bases. Common table salt, or sodium chloride, NaCl, may in every respect

be taken as a type of salts in general, and we will therefore pass to

the consideration of this substance, and of hydrochloric acid, and of

the base sodium hydroxide, formed by the non-metal chlorine and the

metal sodium, which correspond with it.

[1] But it is impossible to foretell all the compounds formed by an

element from its atomicity or valency, because the atomicity of the

elements is variable, and furthermore this variability is not

identical for different elements. In CO_{2}, COX_{2}, CH_{4}, and

the multitude of carbon compounds corresponding with them, the C is

quadrivalent, but in CO either the carbon must be taken as bivalent

or the atomicity of oxygen be accounted as variable. Moreover,

carbon is an example of an element which preserves its atomicity to

a greater degree than most of the other elements. Nitrogen in

NH_{3}, NH_{2}(OH), N_{2}O_{3}, and even in CNH, must be considered

as trivalent, but in NH_{4}Cl, NO_{2}(OH), and in all their

corresponding compounds it is necessarily pentavalent. In N_{2}O,

if the atomicity of oxygen = 2, nitrogen has an uneven atomicity

(1, 3, 5), whilst in NO it is bivalent. If sulphur be bivalent,

like oxygen, in many of its compounds (for example, H_{2}S,

SCl_{2}, KHS, &c.), then it could not be foreseen from this that it

would form SO_{2}, SO_{3}, SCl_{4}, SOCl_{2}, and a series of

similar compounds in which its atomicity must be acknowledged as

greater than 2. Thus SO_{2}, sulphurous anhydride, has many points

in common with CO_{2}, and if carbon be quadrivalent then the S in

SO_{2} is quadrivalent. Therefore the principle of atomicity

(valency) of the elements cannot be considered established as the

basis for the study of the elements, although it gives an easy

method of grasping many analogies. I consider the four following as

the chief obstacles to acknowledging the atomicity of the elements

as a primary conception for the consideration of the properties of

the elements: 1. Such univalent elements as H, Cl, &c., appear in a

free state as molecules H_{2}, Cl_{2}, &c., and are consequently

like the univalent radicles CH_{3}, OH, CO_{2}H, &c., which, as

might be expected, appear as C_{2}H_{6}, O_{2}H_{2},

C_{2}O_{4}H_{2} (ethane, hydrogen peroxide, oxalic acid), whilst on

the other hand, potassium and sodium (perhaps also iodine at a high

temperature) contain only one atom, K, Na, in the molecule in a

free state. Hence it follows that _free affinities_ may exist.

Granting this, nothing prevents the assumption that free affinities

exist in all unsaturated compounds; for example, two free

affinities in NH_{3}. If such instances of free affinities be

admitted, then all the possible advantages to be gained by the

application of the doctrine of atomicity (valency) are lost. 2.

There are instances--for example, Na_{2}H--where univalent elements

are combined in molecules which are more complex than R_{2}, and

form molecules, R_{3}, R_{4}, &c.; this may again be either taken

as evidence of the existence of free affinities, or else

necessitates such primary univalent elements as sodium and hydrogen

being considered as variable in their atomicity. 3. The periodic

system of the elements, with which we shall afterwards become

acquainted, shows that there is a law or rule for the variation of

the forms of oxygen and hydrogen compounds; chlorine is univalent

with respect to hydrogen, and septavalent with respect to oxygen;

sulphur is bivalent to hydrogen, and sexavalent to oxygen;

phosphorus is trivalent to hydrogen and pentavalent in respect to

oxygen--the sum is in every case equal to 8. Only carbon and its

analogues (for example, silicon) are quadrivalent to both hydrogen

and oxygen. Hence the power of the elements to change their

atomicity is an essential part of their nature, and therefore

constant valency cannot he considered as a fundamental property. 4.

Crystallo-hydrates (for instance, NaCl,2H_{2}O, or NaBr,2H_{2}O),

double salts (such as PtCl_{4},2KCl,H_{2}SiF_{6}, &c.), and similar

complex compounds (and, according to Chap. I., solutions also)

demonstrate the capacity not only of the elements themselves, but

also of their saturated and limiting compounds, of entering into

further combination. Therefore the admission of a definite limited

atomicity of the elements includes in itself an admission of

limitation which is not in accordance with the nature of chemical

reactions.

_Sodium chloride_, NaCl, the familiar table salt, occurs, although in

very small quantities, in all the primary formations of the earth's

crust,[2] from which it is washed away by the atmospheric waters; it is

contained in small quantities in all waters flowing through these

formations, and is in this manner conveyed to the oceans and seas. The

immense mass of salt in the oceans has been accumulated by this process

from the remote ages of the earth's creation, because the water has

evaporated from them while the salt has remained in solution. The salt of

sea water serves as the source not only for its direct extraction, but

also for the formation of other masses of workable salt, such as rock

salt, and of saline springs and lakes.[2 bis]

[2] The primary formations are those which do not bear any distinct

traces of having been deposited from water (have not a stratified

formation and contain no remains of animal or vegetable life),

occur under the sedimentary formations of the earth, and are

everywhere uniform in composition and structure, the latter being

generally distinctly crystalline. If it be assumed that the earth

was originally in a molten condition, the first primary formations

are those which formed the first solid crust of the earth. But even

with this hypothesis of the earth's origin, it is necessary to

admit that the first aqueous deposits must have caused a change in

the original crust of the earth, and therefore under the head of

primary formations must be understood the most ancient of the

products of decomposition (mostly by atmospheric, aqueous, and

organic agency, &c.), from which all the rocks and substances of

the earth's surface have arisen. In speaking of the origin of one

or another substance, we can only, on the basis of facts, descend

to the primary formations, of which granite, gneiss, and trachyte

may be taken as examples.

[2 bis] Chloride of sodium has been found to occur in the atmosphere in

the form of a fine dust; in the lower strata it is present in

larger quantities than in the upper, so that the rain water falling

on mountains contains less NaCl than that falling in valleys. Müntz

(1891) found that a litre of rain water collected on the summit of

the Pic du Midi (2,877 metres above the sea level) contained 0·34

milligram of chloride of sodium, while a litre of rain collected

from the valley contained 2·5-7·6 milligrams.

The extraction of salt _from sea water_ is carried on in several ways. In

southern climes, especially on the shores of the Atlantic Ocean and the

Mediterranean and Black Seas, the summer heats are taken advantage of. A

convenient low-lying sea shore is chosen, and a whole series of basins,

communicating with each other, are constructed along it. The upper of

these basins are filled with sea water by pumping, or else advantage is

taken of high tides. These basins are sometimes separated from the sea by

natural sand-banks (limans) or by artificial means, and in spring the

water already begins to evaporate considerably. As the solution becomes

more concentrated, it is run into the succeeding basins, and the upper

ones are supplied with a fresh quantity of sea water, or else an

arrangement is made enabling the salt water to flow by degrees through

the series of basins. It is evident that the beds of the basins should be

as far as possible impervious to water, and for this purpose they are

made of beaten clay. The crystals of salt begin to separate out when the

concentration attains 28 p.c. of salt (which corresponds to 28° of

Baumé's hydrometer). They are raked off, and employed for all those

purposes to which table salt is applicable. In the majority of cases only

the first half of the sodium chloride which can be separated from the sea

water is extracted, because the second half has a bitter taste from the

presence of magnesium salts which separate out together with the sodium

salt. But in certain localities--as, for instance, in the estuary of the

Rhone, on the island of Camarga[3]--the evaporation is carried on to the

very end, in order to obtain those magnesium and potassium salts which

separate out at the end of the evaporation of sea water. Various salts

are separated from sea water in its evaporation. From 100 parts of sea

water there separates out, by natural and artificial evaporation, about

one part of tolerably pure table salt at the very commencement of the

operation; the total amount held in solution being about 2-1/2 p.c. The

remaining portion separates out intermixed with the bitter salts of

magnesium which, owing to their solubility and the small amount in which

they are present (less than 1 p.c.), only separate out, in the first

crystallisations, in traces. Gypsum, or calcium sulphate,

CaSO_{4},2H_{2}O, because of its sparing solubility, separates together

with or even before the table salt. When about half of the latter has

separated, then a mixture of table salt and magnesium sulphate separates

out, and on still further evaporation the chlorides of potassium and

magnesium begin to separate in a state of combination, forming the double

salt KMgCl_{3},6H_{2}O, which occurs in nature as _carnallite_.[4] After

the separation of this salt from sea water, there remains a mother liquor

containing a large amount of magnesium chloride in admixture with various

other salts.[5] The extraction of sea salt is usually carried on for the

purpose of procuring table salt, and therefore directly it begins to

separate mixed with a considerable proportion[6] of magnesium salts (when

it acquires a bitter taste) the remaining liquor is run back into the

sea.

[3] The extraction of the potassium salts (or so-called summer salts)

was carried on at the Isle of Camarga about 1870, when I had

occasion to visit that spot. At the present time the deposits of

Stassfurt provide a much cheaper salt, owing to the evaporation and

separation of the salt being carried on there by natural means and

only requiring a treatment and refining, which is also necessary in

addition for the 'summer salt' obtained from sea-water.

[4] The double salt KCl,MgCl_{2} is a crystallohydrate of KCl and

MgCl_{2}, and is only formed from solutions containing an excess of

magnesium chloride, because water decomposes this double salt,

extracting the more soluble magnesium chloride from it.

[5] Owing to the fundamental property of salts of interchanging their

metals, it cannot be said that sea water contains this or that

salt, but only that it contains certain amounts of certain metals M

(univalent like Na and K, and bivalent like Mg and Ca), and haloids

X (univalent like Cl, Br, and bivalent like SO_{4}, CO_{3}), which

are disposed in every possible kind of grouping; for instance, K as

KCl, KBr, K_{2}SO_{4}, Mg as MgCl_{2}, MgBr_{2}, MgSO_{4}, and so

on for all the other metals. In evaporation different salts

separate out consecutively only because they reach saturation. A

proof of this may be seen in the fact that a solution of a mixture

of sodium chloride and magnesium sulphate (both of which salts are

obtained from sea water, as was mentioned above), when evaporated,

deposits crystals of these salts, but when refrigerated (if the

solution be sufficiently saturated) the salt Na_{2}SO_{4},10H_{2}O

is first deposited because it is the first to arrive at saturation

at low temperatures. Consequently this solution contains MgCl_{2}

and Na_{2}SO_{4}, besides MgSO_{4} and NaCl. So it is with sea

water.

[6] The salt extracted from water is piled up in heaps and left exposed

to the action of rain water, which purifies it, owing to the water

becoming saturated with sodium chloride and then no longer

dissolving it, but washing out the impurities.

The same process which is employed for artificially obtaining salt in a

crystalline form from sea water has been repeatedly accomplished during

the geological evolution of the earth on a gigantic scale; upheavals of

the earth have cut off portions of the sea from the remainder (as the

Dead Sea was formerly a part of the Mediterranean, and the Sea of Aral of

the Caspian), and their water has evaporated and formed (if the mass of

the inflowing fresh water were less than that of the mass evaporated)

deposits of _rock salt_. It is always accompanied by gypsum, because the

latter is separated from sea water with or before the sodium chloride.

For this reason rock salt may always be looked for in those localities

where there are deposits of gypsum. But inasmuch as the gypsum remains on

the spot where it has been deposited (as it is a sparingly soluble salt),

whilst the rock salt (as one which is very soluble) may be washed away by

rain or fresh running water, it may sometimes happen that although gypsum

is still found there may be no salt; but, on the other hand, where there

is rock salt there will always be gypsum. As the geological changes of

the earth's surface are still proceeding at the present day, so in the

midst of the dry land salt lakes are met with, which are sometimes

scattered over vast districts formerly covered by seas now dried up. Such

is the origin of many of the salt lakes about the lower portions of the

Volga and in the Kirghiz steppes, where at a geological epoch preceding

the present the Aralo-Caspian Sea extended. Such are the Baskunchaksky

(in the Government of Astrakhan, 112 square kilometres superficial area),

the Eltonsky (140 versts from the left bank of the Volga, and 200 square

kilometres in superficial area), and upward of 700 other salt lakes lying

about the lower portions of the Volga. In those in which the inflow of

fresh water is less than that yearly evaporated, and in which the

concentration of the solution has reached saturation, the

_self-deposited_ salt is found already deposited on their beds, or is

being yearly deposited during the summer months. Certain limans, or

sea-side lakes, of the Azoff Sea are essentially of the same

character--as, for instance, those in the neighbourhood of Henichesk and

Berdiansk. The saline soils of certain Central Asian steppes, which

suffer from a want of atmospheric fresh water, are of the same origin.

Their salt originally proceeded from the salt of seas which previously

covered these localities, and has not yet been washed away by fresh

water. The main result of the above-described process of nature is the

formation of masses of rock salt, which are, however, being gradually

washed away by the subsoil waters flowing in their neighbourhood, and

afterwards rising to the surface in certain places as _saline springs_,

which indicate the presence of masses of deposited rock salt in the

depths of the earth. If the subsoil water flows along a stratum of salt

for a sufficient length of time it becomes saturated; but in flowing in

its further course along an impervious stratum (clay) it becomes diluted

by the fresh water leaking through the upper soil, and therefore the

greater the distance of a saline spring from the deposit of rock salt,

the poorer will it be in salt. A perfectly saturated brine, however, may

be procured from the depths of the earth by means of bore-holes. The

deposits of rock salt themselves, which are sometimes hidden at great

depths below the earth's strata, may be discovered by the guidance of

bore-holes and the direction of the strata of the district. Deposits of

rock salt, about 35 metres thick and 20 metres below the surface, were

discovered in this manner in the neighbourhood of Brianstcheffky and

Dekonoffky, in the Bakhmut district of the Government of Ekaterinoslav.

Large quantities of most excellent rock salt are now (since 1880)

obtained from these deposits, whose presence was indicated by the

neighbouring salt springs (near Slaviansk and Bakhmut) and by bore-holes

which had been sunk in these localities for procuring strong (saturated)

brines. But the Stassfurt deposits of rock salt near Magdeburg in Germany

are celebrated as being the first discovered in this manner, and for

their many remarkable peculiarities.[7] The plentiful distribution of

saline springs in this and the neighbouring districts suggested the

presence of deposits of rock salt in the vicinity. Deep bore-holes sunk

in this locality did in fact give a richer brine--even quite saturated

with salt. On sinking to a still greater depth, the deposits of salt

themselves were at last arrived at. But the first deposit which was met

with consisted of a bitter salt unfit for consumption, and was therefore

called refuse salt (_Abraumsalz_). On sinking still deeper vast beds of

real rock salt were struck. In this instance the presence of these upper

strata containing salts of potassium, magnesium, and sodium is an

excellent proof of the formation of rock salt from sea water. It is very

evident that not only a case of evaporation to the end--as far, for

instance, as the separation of carnallite--but also the preservation of

such soluble salts as separate out from sea water after the sodium

chloride, must be a very exceptional phenomenon, which is not repeated in

all deposits of rock salt. The Stassfurt deposits therefore are of

particular interest, not only from a scientific point of view, but also

because they form a rich source of potassium salts which have many

practical uses.[7 bis]

[7] When the German savants pointed out the exact locality of the

Stassfurt salt-beds and their depth below the surface, on the basis

of information collected from various quarters respecting

bore-holes and the direction of the strata, and when the borings,

conducted by the Government, struck a salt-bed which was bitter and

unfit for use, there was a great outcry against science, and the

doubtful result even caused the cessation of the further work of

deepening the shafts. It required a great effort to persuade the

Government to continue the work. Now, when the pure salt

encountered below forms one of the important riches of Germany, and

when those 'refuse salts' have proved to be most valuable (as a

source of potassium and magnesium), we should see in the

utilisation of the Stassfurt deposits one of the conquests of

science for the common welfare.

[7 bis] In Western Europe, deposits of rock salt have long been known

at Wieliczka, near Cracow, and at Cardona in Spain. In Russia the

following deposits are known: (_a_) the vast masses of rock salt (3

square kilometres area and up to 140 metres thick) lying directly

on the surface of the earth at Iletzky Zastchit, on the left bank

of the river Ural, in the Government of Orenburg; (_b_) the

Chingaksky deposit, 90 versts from the river Volga, in the

Enotaeffsky district of the Government of Astrakhan; (_c_) the

Kulepinsky (and other) deposits (whose thickness attains 150

metres), on the Araks, in the Government of Erivan in the Caucasus;

(_d_) the Katchiezmansky deposit in the province of Kars; (_e_) the

Krasnovodsky deposit in the Trans-Caspian province; and (_f_) the

Bardymkulsky salt mines in Kokhand.

A saturated brine, formed by the continued contact of subsoil water with

rock salt, is extracted by means of bore-holes, as, for instance, in the

Governments of Perm, Kharkoff, and Ekaterinoslav. Sometimes, as at

Berchtesgaden (and at Hallein) in Austria, spring water is run on to

underground beds of rock salt containing much clay.

[Illustration: FIG. 64.--Graduator for the evaporation of the water of

saline springs.]

If a saline spring, or the salt water pumped from bore-holes, contains

but little salt, then the first concentration of the natural solution

is not carried on by the costly consumption of fuel, but by the cheaper

method of evaporation by means of the wind. For this purpose so-called

graduators are constructed: they consist of long and lofty sheds,

which are sometimes several versts long, and generally extend in a

direction at right angles to that of the usual course of the wind in

the district. These sheds are open at the sides, and are filled with

brushwood as shown in fig. 64. Troughs, A B, C D, into which the salt

water is pumped, run along the top. On flowing from these troughs,

through the openings, _a_, the water spreads over the brushwood and

distributes itself in a thin layer over it, so that it presents a very

large surface for evaporation, in consequence of which it rapidly

becomes concentrated in warm or windy weather. After trickling over the

brushwood, the solution collects in a reservoir under the graduator,

whence it is usually pumped up by the pumps P P´, and again run a

second and third time through the graduator, until the solution reaches

a degree of concentration at which it becomes profitable to extract

the salt by direct heating. Generally the evaporation in the graduator

is not carried beyond a concentration of 12 to 15 parts of salt in

100 parts of solution. Strong natural solutions of salt, and also the

graduated solutions, are evaporated in large shallow metallic vessels,

which are either heated by the direct action of the flame from below

or from above. These vessels are made of boiler plate, and are called

salt-pans. Various means are employed for accelerating the evaporation

and for economising fuel, which are mainly based on an artificial

draught to carry off the steam as it is formed, and on subjecting the

saline solution to a preliminary heating by the waste heat of the

steam and furnace gases. Furthermore, the first portions of the salt

which crystallise out in the salt-pans are invariably contaminated

with gypsum, since the waters of saline springs always contain this

substance. It is only the portions of the salt which separate later that

are distinguished by their great purity. The salt is ladled out as it is

deposited, left to drain on inclined tables and then dried, and in this

manner the so-called bay salt is obtained. Since it has become possible

to discover the saline deposits themselves, the extraction of table salt

from the water of saline springs by evaporation, which previously was

in general use, has begun to be disused, and is only able to hold its

ground in places where fuel is cheap.

In order to understand the full importance of the extraction of salt,

it need only be mentioned that on the average 20 lbs. of table salt are

consumed yearly per head of population, directly in food or for cattle.

In those countries where common salt is employed in technical processes,

and especially in England, almost an equal quantity is consumed in the

production of substances containing chlorine and sodium, and especially

in the manufacture of washing soda, &c., and of chlorine compounds

(bleaching powder and hydrochloric acid). The yearly production of salt

in Europe amounts to as much as 7-1/2 million tons.

Although certain lumps of rock salt and crystals of bay salt sometimes

consist of almost pure sodium chloride, still the ordinary commercial

salt contains various impurities, the most common of which are

magnesium salts. If the salt be pure, its solution gives no precipitate

with sodium carbonate, Na_{2}CO_{3}, showing the absence of magnesium

salts, because magnesium carbonate, MgCO_{3}, is insoluble in water.

Rock salt, which is ground for use, generally contains also a

considerable admixture of clay and other insoluble impurities.[8] For

ordinary use the bulk of the salt obtained can be employed directly

without further purification; but some salts are purified by solution

and crystallisation of the solution after standing, in which case the

evaporation is not carried on to dryness, and the impurities remain

in the _mother liquor_ or in the sediment. When perfectly pure salt

is required for chemical purposes it is best obtained as follows: a

saturated solution of table salt is prepared, and hydrochloric acid

gas is passed through it; this precipitates the sodium chloride (which

is not soluble in a strong solution of hydrochloric acid), while the

impurities remain in solution. By repeating the operation and fusing

the salt (when adhering hydrochloric acid is volatilised) a pure

salt is obtained, which is again crystallised from its solution by

evaporation.[9]

[8] The fracture of rock salt generally shows the presence of

interlayers of impurities which are sometimes very small in weight,

but visible owing to their refraction. In the excellently laid out

salt mines of Briansk I counted (1888), if my memory does not

deceive me, on an average ten interlayers per metre of thickness,

between which the salt was in general very pure, and in places

quite transparent. If this be the case, then there would be 350

interlayers for the whole thickness (about 35 metres) of the bed.

They probably correspond with the yearly deposition of the salt. In

this case the deposition would have extended over more than 300

years. This should be observable at the present day in lakes where

the salt is saturated and in course of deposition.

[9] My own investigations have shown that not only the sulphates, but

also the potassium salts, are entirely removed by this method.

Pure sodium chloride, in well-defined crystals (slowly deposited at the

bottom of the liquid) or in compact masses (in which form rock salt is

sometimes met with), is a colourless and transparent substance

resembling, but more brittle and less hard than, glass.[10] Common salt

always crystallises in the cubic system, most frequently in _cubes_, and

more rarely in octahedra. Large transparent cubes of common salt, having

edges up to 10 centimetres long, are sometimes found in masses of rock

salt.[11] When evaporated in the open the salt often separates out on

the surface[12] as cubes, which grow on to each other in the form of

pyramidal square funnels. In still weather, these clusters are able to

support themselves on the surface of the water for a long time, and

sometimes go on increasing to a considerable extent, but they sink

directly the water penetrates inside them. Salt fuses to a colourless

liquid (sp. gr. 1·602, according to Quincke) at 851° (V. Meyer); if pure

it solidifies to a non-crystalline mass, and if impure to an opaque mass

whose surface is not smooth. In fusing, sodium chloride commences to

volatilise (its weight decreases) and at a white heat it volatilises with

great ease and completely; but at the ordinary temperature it may, like

all ordinary salts, be considered as non-volatile, although as yet no

exact experiments have been made in this direction.

[10] According to the determinations of Klodt, the Briansk rock salt

withstands a pressure of 340 kilograms per square centimetre,

whilst glass withstands 1,700 kilos. In this respect salt is twice

as secure as bricks, and therefore immense masses may be extracted

from underground workings with perfect safety, without having

recourse to brickwork supports, merely taking advantage of the

properties of the salt itself.

[11] To obtain well-formed crystals, a saturated solution is mixed with

ferric chloride, several small crystals of sodium chloride are

placed at the bottom, and the solution is allowed to evaporate

slowly in a vessel with a loose-fitting cover. Octahedral crystals

are obtained by the addition of borax, urea, &c., to the solution.

Very fine crystals are formed in a mass of gelatinous silica.

[12] If a solution of sodium chloride be slowly heated from above,

where the evaporation takes place, then the upper layer will

become saturated before the lower and cooler layers, and therefore

crystallisation will begin on the surface, and the crystals first

formed will float, having also dried from above, on the surface

until they become quite soaked. Being heavier than the solution

the crystals are partially immersed under it, and the following

crystallisation, also proceeding on the surface, will only form

crystals along the side of the original crystals. A funnel is

formed in this manner. It will be borne on the surface like a boat

(if the liquid be quiescent), because it will grow more from the

upper edges. We can thus understand this at first sight strange

funnel form of crystallisation of salt. In explanation why the

crystallisation under the above conditions begins at the surface

and not at the lower layers, it must be mentioned that the

specific gravity of a crystal of sodium chloride = 2·16, and that

of a solution saturated at 25° contains 26·7 p.c. of salt and has

a specific gravity at 25°/4° of 1·2004; at 15° a saturated

solution contains 26·5 p.c. of salt and has a sp. gr. 1·203 at

15°/4°. Hence a solution saturated at a higher temperature is

specifically lighter, notwithstanding the greater amount of salt

it contains. With many substances _surface crystallisation_ cannot

take place because their solubility increases more rapidly with

the temperature than their specific gravity decreases. In this

case the saturated solution will always be in the lower layers,

where also the crystallisation will take place. Besides which it

may be added that as a consequence of the properties of water and

solutions, when they are heated from above (for instance, by the

sun's rays), the warmer layers being the lightest remain above,

whilst when heated from below they rise to the top. For this

reason the water at great depths below the surface is always cold,

which has long been known. These circumstances, as well as those

observed by Soret (Chapter I., Note 19), explain the great

differences of density and temperature, and in the amount of salts

held in the oceans at different latitudes (in polar and tropical

climes) and at various depths.

A saturated[13] solution of table salt (containing 26·4 p.c.) has at the

ordinary temperature a specific gravity of about 1·2. The specific

gravity of the crystals is 2·167 (17°). The salt which separates out at

the ordinary and higher temperatures contains no water of

crystallisation;[14] but if the crystals are formed at a low

temperature, especially from a saturated solution cooled to -12°, then

they present a prismatic form, and contain two equivalents of water,

NaCl,2H_{2}O. At the ordinary temperature these crystals split up into

sodium chloride and its solution.[15] Unsaturated solutions of table salt

when cooled below 0° give[16] crystals of ice, but when the solution has

a composition NaCl,10H_{2}O it solidifies completely at a temperature of

-23°. A solution of table salt saturated at its boiling point boils at

about 109°, and contains about 42 parts of salt per 100 parts of water.

[13] By combining the results of Poggiale, Müller, and Karsten (they

are evidently more accurate than those of Gay-Lussac and others) I

found that a saturated solution at _t_°, from 0° to 108°, contains

35·7 + 0·024_t_ + 0·0002_t_^2 grams of salt per 100 grams of

water. This formula gives a solubility at 0° = 35·7 grams (= 26·3

p.c.), whilst according to Karsten it is 36·09, Poggiale 35·5, and

Müller 35·6 grams.

[14] Perfectly pure _fused_ salt is not hygroscopic, according to

Karsten, whilst the crystallised salt, even when quite pure,

attracts as much as 0·6 p.c. of water from moist air, according to

Stas. (In the Briansk mines, where the temperature throughout the

whole year is about +10°, it may be observed, as Baron Klodt

informed me, that in the summer during damp weather the walls

become moist, while in winter they are dry).

If the salt contain impurities--such as magnesium sulphate, &c.--it

is more hygroscopic. If it contain any magnesium chloride, it

partially deliquesces in a damp atmosphere. The crystallised and

not perfectly pure salt decrepitates when heated, owing to its

containing water. The pure salt, and also the transparent rock

salt, or that which has been once fused, does not decrepitate.

Fused sodium chloride shows a faint alkaline reaction to litmus,

which has been noticed by many observers, and is due to the

presence of sodium oxide (probably by the action of the oxygen of

the atmosphere). According to A. Stcherbakoff very sensitive

litmus (washed in alcohol and neutralised with oxalic acid) shows

an alkaline reaction even with the crystallised salt.

It may be observed that rock salt sometimes contains cavities

filled with a colourless liquid. Certain kinds of rock salt emit

an odour like that of hydrocarbons. These phenomena have as yet

received very little attention.

[15] By cooling a solution of table salt saturated at the ordinary

temperature to -15°, I obtained first of all well-formed tabular

(six-sided) crystals, which when warmed to the ordinary

temperature disintegrated (with the separation of anhydrous sodium

chloride), and then prismatic needles up to 20 mm. long were

formed from the same solution. I have not yet investigated the

reason of the difference in crystalline form. It is known

(Mitscherlich) that NaI,2H_{2}O also crystallises either in plates

or prisms. Sodium bromide also crystallises with 2H_{2}O at the

ordinary temperature.

[16] Notwithstanding the great simplicity (Chapter I., Note 49) of the

observations on the formation of ice from solution, still even for

sodium chloride they cannot yet be considered as sufficiently

harmonious. According to Blagden and Raoult, the temperature of

the formation of ice from a solution containing _c_ grams of salt

per 100 grams of water =-0·6_c_ to _c_ = 10, according to Rosetti

=-0·649_c_ to _c_ = 8·7, according to De Coppet (to _c_ = 10)

=-0·55_c_-0·006_c_^2, according to Karsten (to _c_ = 10)-0·762_c_

+ 0·0084_c_^2, and according to Guthrie a much lower figure. By

taking Rosetti's figure and applying the rule given in Chapter I.,

Note 49 we obtain--

_i_ - 0·649 × 58·5/18·5 = 2·05.

Pickering (1893) gives for _c_ = 1-0·603, for _c_ = 2-1·220; that

is (_c_ up to 2·7) about -(0·600 + 0·005_c_)_c_.

The data for strong solutions are not less contradictory. Thus

with 20 p.c. of salt, ice is formed at -14·4° according to

Karsten,-17° according to Guthrie,-17·6° according to De Coppet.

Rüdorff states that for strong solutions the temperature of the

formation of ice descends in proportion to the contents of the

compound, NaCl,2H_{2}O (per 100 grams of water) by 0°·342 per 1

gram of salt, and De Coppet shows that there is no

proportionality, in a strict sense, for either a percentage of

NaCl or of NaCl,2H_{2}O.

Of all its physical properties the specific gravity of solutions of

sodium chloride is the one which has been the most fully investigated. A

comparison of all the existing determinations of the specific gravity of

solutions of NaCl[17] at 15° (in vacuo, taking water at 4° as 10,000),

with regard to _p_ (the percentage amount of the salt in solution), show

that it is expressed by the equation S_{15} = 9991·6 + 71·17_p_ +

0·2140_p_^2. For instance, for a solution 200H_{2}O + NaCl, in which case

_p_ = 1·6, S_{15} = 1·0106. It is seen from the formula that the addition

of water produces a contraction.[18] The specific gravity[19] at certain

temperatures and concentrations in vacuo referred to water at 4° =

10,000[20] is here given for

0° 15° 30° 100°

_p_ = 5 10372 10353 10307 9922

10 10768 10728 10669 10278

15 11164 11107 11043 10652

20 11568 11501 11429 11043

It should be remarked that Baumé's hydrometer is graduated by taking a

10 p.c. solution of sodium chloride as 10° on the scale, and therefore

it gives approximately the percentage amount of the salt in a solution.

Common salt is somewhat soluble in alcohol,[21] but it is insoluble in

ether and in oils.

[17] A collection of observations on the specific gravity of solutions

of sodium chloride is given in my work cited in Chapter I.,

Note 50.

Solutions of common salt have also been frequently investigated as

regards rate of _diffusion_ (Chapter I.), but as yet there are no

complete data in this respect. It may be mentioned that Graham and

De Vries demonstrated that diffusion in gelatinous masses (for

instance, gelatin jelly, or gelatinous silica) proceeds in the

same manner as in water, which may probably lead to a convenient

and accurate method for the investigation of the phenomena of

diffusion. N. Umoff (Odessa, 1888) investigated the diffusion of

common salt by means of glass globules of definite density. Having

poured water into a cylinder over a layer of a solution of sodium

chloride, he observed during a period of several months the

position (height) of the globules, which floated up higher and

higher as the salt permeated upwards. Umoff found that at a

constant temperature the distances of the globules (that is, the

length of a column limited by layers of definite concentration)

remain constant; that at a given moment of time the concentration,

_q_, of different layers situated at a depth _z_ is expressed by

the equation B-K_z_ = log.(A-_q_), where A, B, and K are

constants; that at a given moment the rate of diffusion of the

different layers is proportional to their depth, &_c._

[18] If _S__{0} be the specific gravity of water, and _S_ the specific

gravity of a solution containing _p_ p.c. of salt, then by mixing

equal weights of water and the solution, we shall obtain a

solution containing 1/2_p_ of the salt, and if it be formed

without contraction, then its specific gravity _x_ will be

determined by the equation 2/_x_ = 1/S_{0} + 1/S, because the

volume is equal to the weight divided by the density. In reality,

the specific gravity is always found to be greater than that

calculated on the supposition of an absence of contraction.

[19] Generally the specific gravity is observed by weighing in air and

dividing the weight in grams by the volume in cubic centimetres,

the latter being found from the weight of water displaced, divided

by its density at the temperature at which the experiment is

carried out. If we call this specific gravity S_{1}, then as a

cubic centimetre of air under the usual conditions weighs about

0·0012 gram, the sp. gr. in a vacuum S = S_{1} + 0·0012 (S_{1}

- 1), if the density of water = 1.

[20] If the sp. gr. S_{2} be found directly by dividing the weight of a

solution by the weight of water at the same temperature and in the

same volume, then the true sp. gr. _S_ referred to water at 4° is

found by multiplying S_{2} by the sp. gr. of water at the

temperature of observation.

[21] According to Schiff 100 grams of alcohol, containing _p_ p.c. by

weight of C_{2}H_{6}O, dissolves at 15°--

_p_ = 10 20 40 60 80

28·5 22·6 13·2 5·9 1·2 grams NaCl.

Common salt gives very few compounds[22] (double salts) and these are

very readily decomposed: it is also decomposed with great difficulty and

its dissociation is unknown.[23] But it is easily decomposed, both when

fused and in solution, by the action of a galvanic current. If the dry

salt be fused in a crucible and an electric current be passed through it

by immersing carbon or platinum electrodes in it (the positive electrode

is made of carbon and the negative of platinum or mercury), it is

_decomposed_: the suffocating gas, chlorine, is liberated at the positive

pole and metallic sodium at the negative pole. Both of them act on the

excess of water at the moment of their evolution; the sodium evolves

hydrogen and forms caustic soda, and the chlorine evolves oxygen and

forms hydrochloric acid, and therefore on passing a current through a

solution of common salt metallic sodium will not be obtained--but oxygen,

chlorine, and hydrochloric acid will appear at the positive pole, and

hydrogen and caustic soda at the negative pole.[23 bis] Thus salt, like

other salts, is decomposed by the action of an electric current into a

metal and a haloid (Chapter III.) Naturally, like all other salts, it may

be formed from the corresponding base and acid with the separation of

water. In fact if we mix caustic soda (base) with hydrochloric acid

(acid), table salt is formed, NaHO + HCl = NaCl + H_{2}O.

[22] Amongst the double salts formed by sodium chloride that obtained

by Ditte (1870) by the evaporation of the solution remaining after

heating sodium iodate with hydrochloric acid until chlorine ceases

to be liberated, is a remarkable one. Its composition is

NaIO_{3},NaCl,14H_{2}O. Rammelsberg obtained a similar (perhaps

the same) salt in well-formed crystals by the direct reaction of

both salts.

[23] But it gives sodium in the flame of a Bunsen's burner (see

Spectrum Analysis), doubtless under the reducing action of the

elements carbon and hydrogen. In the presence of an excess of

hydrochloric acid in the flame (when the sodium would form sodium

chloride), no sodium is formed in the flame and the salt does not

communicate its usual coloration.

[23 bis] There is no doubt, however, but that chloride of sodium is

also decomposed in its aqueous solutions with the separation of

sodium, and that it does not simply enter into double

decomposition with the water (NaCl + H_{2}O = NaHO + HCl). This is

seen from the fact that when a saturated solution of NaCl is

rapidly decomposed by an electric current, a large amount of

chlorine appears at the anode and a sodium amalgam forms at the

mercury cathode, which acts but slowly upon the strong solution of

salt. Castner's process for the electrolysis of brine into

chlorine and caustic soda is an application of this method which

has been already worked in England on an industrial scale.

With resspect to the double decompositions of sodium chloride it should

be observed that they are most varied, and serve as means of obtaining

nearly all the other compounds of sodium and chlorine.

_The double decompositions of sodium chloride_ are almost exclusively

based on the possibility of the metal sodium being exchanged for

hydrogen and other metals. But neither hydrogen nor any other metal can

directly displace the sodium from sodium chloride. This would result

in the separation of metallic sodium, which itself displaces hydrogen

and the majority of other metals from their compounds, and is not,

so far as is known, ever separated by them. The replacement of the

sodium in sodium chloride by hydrogen and various metals can only take

place by the transference of the sodium into some other combination.

If hydrogen or a metal, M, be combined with an element X, then the

double decomposition NaCl + MX = NaX + MCl takes place. Such double

decompositions take place under special conditions, sometimes completely

and sometimes only partially, as we shall endeavour to explain. In order

to acquaint ourselves with the double decompositions of sodium chloride,

we will follow the methods actually employed in practice to procure

compounds of sodium and of chlorine from common salt. For this purpose

we will first describe the treatment of sodium chloride with sulphuric

acid for the preparation of hydrochloric acid and sodium sulphate.

We will then describe the substances obtained from hydrochloric acid

and sodium sulphate. Chlorine itself, and nearly all the compounds of

this element, may be procured from hydrochloric acid, whilst sodium

carbonate, caustic soda, metallic sodium itself and all its compounds,

may be obtained from sodium sulphate.

Even in the animal organism salt undergoes similar changes, furnishing

the sodium, alkali, and hydrochloric acid which take part in the

processes of animal life.

Its necessity as a constituent in the food both of human beings and of

animals becomes evident when we consider that both hydrochloric acid and

salts of sodium are found in the substances which are separated out from

the blood into the stomach and intestines. Sodium salts are found in the

blood and in the bile which is elaborated in the liver and acts on the

food in the alimentary canal, whilst hydrochloric acid is found in the

acid juices of the stomach. Chlorides of the metals are always found in

considerable quantities in the urine, and if they are excreted they must

be replenished in the organism; and for the replenishment of the loss,

substances containing chlorine compounds must be taken in food. Not only

do animals consume those small amounts of sodium chloride which are

found in drinking water or in plants or other animals, but experience

has shown that many wild animals travel long distances in search of salt

springs, and that domestic animals which in their natural condition do

not require salt, willingly take it, and that the functions of their

organisms become much more regular from their doing so.

_The action of sulphuric acid on sodium chloride._--If sulphuric acid

be poured over common salt, then even at the ordinary temperature, as

Glauber observed, an odorous gas, hydrochloric acid, is evolved. The

reaction which takes place consists in the sodium of the salt and the

hydrogen of the sulphuric acid changing places.

NaCl + H_{2}SO_{4} = HCl + NaHSO_{4}

Sodium Sulphuric Hydrochloric Acid sodium

chloride acid acid sulphate

At the ordinary temperature this reaction is not complete, but soon

ceases. When the mixture is heated, the decomposition proceeds until,

if there be sufficient salt present, all the sulphuric acid taken is

converted into acid sodium sulphate. Any excess of acid will remain

unaltered. If 2 molecules of sodium chloride (117 parts) be taken per

molecule of sulphuric acid (98 parts), then on heating the mixture to

a moderate temperature only one-half (58·5) of the salt will suffer

change. Complete decomposition, after which neither hydrogen nor

chlorine is left in the residue, proceeds (when 117 parts of table salt

are taken per 98 parts of sulphuric acid) _at a red heat only_. Then--

2NaCl + H_{2}SO_{4} = 2HCl + Na_{2}SO_{4}

Table Sulphuric Hydrochloric Sodium

salt acid acid sulphate

This double decomposition is the result of the action of the acid

salt, NaHSO_{4}, first formed, on sodium chloride, for the acid salt,

since it contains hydrogen, itself acts like an acid, NaCl + NaHSO_{4}

= HCl + Na_{2}SO_{4}. By adding this equation to the first we obtain

the second, which expresses the ultimate reaction. Hence in the above

reaction, non-volatile or sparingly volatile table salt and sparingly

volatile sulphuric acid are taken, and as the result of their reaction,

after the hydrogen and sodium have exchanged places, there is obtained

non-volatile sodium sulphate and gaseous hydrochloric acid. The fact

of the latter being a gaseous substance forms the main reason for the

reaction proceeding to the very end. The mechanism of this kind of

double decomposition, and the cause of the course of the reaction, are

exactly the same as those we saw in the decomposition of nitre (Chapter

VI.) by the action of sulphuric acid. The sulphuric acid in each case

displaces the other, volatile, acid.

Not only in these two instances, but in every instance, if a volatile

acid can be formed by the substitution of the hydrogen of sulphuric

acid for a metal, then this volatile acid will be formed. From this it

may be concluded that the volatility of the acid should be considered

as the cause of the progress of the reaction; and indeed if the acid be

soluble but not volatile, or if the reaction take place in an enclosed

space where the resulting acid cannot volatilise, or at the ordinary

temperature when it does not pass into the state of elastic vapour--then

the decomposition does not proceed to the end, but only up to a certain

limit. In this respect the explanations given at the beginning of this

century by the French chemist Berthollet in his work 'Essai de Statique

Chimique' are very important. _The doctrine of Berthollet_ starts from

the supposition that the chemical reaction of substances is determined

not only by the degrees of affinity between the different parts, but

also by the relative masses of the reacting substances and by those

physical conditions under which the reaction takes place. Two substances

containing the elements MX and NY, being brought into contact with

each other, form by double decomposition the compounds MY and NX; but

the formation of these two new compounds will not proceed to the end

unless one of them is removed from the sphere of action. But it can

only be removed if it possesses different physical properties from

those of the other substances which are present with it. Either it must

be a gas while the others are liquid or solid, or an insoluble solid

while the others are liquid or soluble. The relative amounts of the

resultant substances, if nothing separates out from their intermixture,

depend only on the relative quantities of the substances MX and NY, and

upon the degrees of attraction existing between the elements M, N, X,

and Y; but however great their mass may be, and however considerable

the attractions, still in any case if nothing separates out from the

sphere of action the decomposition will presently cease, a state of

equilibrium will be established, and instead of two there will remain

four substances in the mass: namely, a portion of the original bodies

MX and NY, and a certain quantity of the newly formed substances MY and

NX, if it be assumed that neither MN or XY nor any other substances are

produced, and this may for the present[24] be admitted in the case of

the double decomposition of salts in which M and X are metals and X and

Y haloids. As the ordinary double decomposition here consists merely

in the exchange of metals, the above simplification is applicable. The

sum total of existing data concerning the double decomposition of salts

leads to the conclusion that from salts MX + NY there always arises

a certain quantity of NX and MY, as should be the case according to

Berthollet's doctrine. A portion of the historical data concerning

this subject will be afterwards mentioned, but we will at once proceed

to point out the observations made by Spring (1888) which show that

_even in a solid state_ salts are subject to a similar interchange of

metals if in a condition of sufficiently close contact (it requires

time, a finely divided state, and intimate mixture). Spring took two

non-hygroscopic salts, potassium nitrate, KNO_{3}, and well-dried sodium

acetate, C_{2}H_{3}NaO_{2}, and left a mixture of their powders for

several months in a desiccator. An interchange of metals took place, as

was seen from the fact that the resultant mass rapidly attracted the

moisture of the air, owing to the formation of sodium nitrate, NaNO_{3},

and potassium acetate, C_{2}H_{3}KO_{2}, both of which are highly

hygroscopic.[24 bis]

[24] If MX and NY represent the molecules of two salts, and if there be

_no third substance_ present (such as water in a solution), the

formation of XY would also be possible; for instance, cyanogen,

iodine, &c. are capable of combining with simple haloids, as well

as with the complex groups which in certain salts play the part of

haloids. Besides which the salts MX and NY or MY with NX may form

double salts. If the number of molecules be unequal, or if the

valency of the elements or groups contained in them be different,

as in NaCl + H_{2}SO_{4}, where Cl is a univalent haloid and

SO_{4} is bivalent, then the matter may be complicated by the

formation of other compounds besides MY and NX, and when a solvent

participates in the action, and especially if present in large

proportion, the phenomena must evidently become still more

complex; and this is actually the case in nature. Hence while

placing before the reader a certain portion of the existing store

of knowledge concerning the phenomena of double saline

decompositions, I cannot consider the theory of the subject as

complete, and have therefore limited myself to a few data, the

completion of which must be sought in more detailed works on the

subject of theoretical chemistry, without losing sight of what has

been said above.

[24 bis] When the mixture of potassium nitrate and sodium acetate was

heated by Spring to 100°, it was completely fused into one mass,

although potassium nitrate fuses at about 340° and sodium nitrate

at about 320°.

When Berthollet enunciated his doctrine the present views of atoms and

molecules had yet to be developed, and it is now necessary to submit the

matter to examination in the light of these conceptions; we will

therefore consider the reaction of salts, taking M and N, X and Y as

equivalent to each other--that is, as capable of replacing each other 'in

toto,' as Na or K,, 1/2Ca or 1/2Mg (bivalent elements) replace hydrogen.

And since, according to Berthollet's doctrine, when _m_MX of one salt

comes into contact with _n_NY of another salt, a certain quantity _x_MY

and _x_NX is formed, there remains _m_-_x_ of the salt MX, and _n_-_x_

of the salt NY. If _m_ be greater than _n_, then the maximum interchange

could lead to _x_ = _n_, whilst from the salts taken there would be

formed _n_MY + _n_NX + (_m_-_n_)MX--that is, a portion of one only of

the salts taken would remain unchanged because the reaction could only

proceed between _n_MX and _n_NY. If _x_ were actually equal to _n_, the

mass of the salt MX would not have any influence on the _modus operandi_

of the reaction, which is equally in accordance with the teaching of

Bergmann, who supposed double reactions to be independent of the mass

and determined by affinity only. If M had more affinity for X than for

Y, and N more affinity for Y than for X, then according to Bergmann

there would be no decomposition whatever, and _x_ would equal 0. If

the affinity of M for Y and of N for X were greater than those in the

original grouping, then the affinity of M for X and of N for Y would be

overcome, and, according to Bergmann's doctrine, complete interchange

would take place--_i.e._ _x_ would equal _n_. According to Berthollet's

teaching, a distribution of M and N between X and Y will take place

in every case, not only in proportion to the degrees of affinity, but

also in proportion to the masses, so that with a small affinity and a

large mass the same action can be produced as with a large affinity

and a small mass. Therefore, (1) _x_ will always be less than _n_ and

their ratio _x_/_n_ less than unity--that is, the decomposition will be

expressed by the equation, _m_MX + _n_NY = (_m_-_x_)MX + (_n_-_x_)NY

+ _x_MY + _x_NX; (2) by increasing the mass _m_ we increase the

decomposition--that is, we increase _x_ and the ratio _x_/(_n_-_x_),

until with an infinitely large quantity m the fraction _x_/_n_ will

equal 1, and the decomposition will be complete, however small the

affinities uniting MY and NX may be; and (3) if _m_ = _n_, by taking MX

+ NY or MY + NX we arrive at one and the same system _in either case_:

(_n_-_x_)MX + (_n_-_x_)NY + _x_MY + _x_NX. These direct consequences of

Berthollet's teaching are verified by experience. Thus, for example,

a mixture of solutions of sodium nitrate and potassium chloride in

all cases has entirely the same properties as a mixture of solutions

of potassium nitrate and sodium chloride, of course on condition that

the mixed solutions are of identical elementary composition. But this

identity of properties might either proceed from one system of salts

passing entirely into the other (Bergmann's hypothesis) in conformity

with the predominating affinities (for instance, from KCl + NaNO_{3}

there might arise KNO_{3} + NaCl, if it be admitted that the affinities

of the elements as combined in the latter system are greater than in

the former); or, on the other hand, it might be because both systems by

the interchange of a portion of their elements give one and the same

state of equilibrium, as according to Berthollet's teaching. Experiment

proves the latter hypothesis to be the true one. But before citing

the most historically important experiments verifying Berthollet's

doctrine, we must stop to consider the conception _of the mass_ of the

reacting substances. Berthollet understood by mass the actual relative

quantity of a substance; but now it is impossible to understand this

term otherwise than as the number of molecules, for they act as chemical

units, and in the special case of double saline decompositions it is

better to take it as the number of equivalents. Thus in the reaction

NaCl + H_{2}SO_{4} the salt is taken in one equivalent and the acid in

two. If 2NaCl + H_{2}SO_{4} act, then the number of equivalents are

equal, and so on. The _influence of mass_ on the amount of decomposition

_x_/_n_ forms the root of Berthollet's doctrine, and therefore we will

first of all turn our attention to the establishment of this principle

in relation to the double decomposition of salts.

About 1840 H. Rose[25] showed that water decomposes metallic sulphides

like calcium sulphide, CaS, forming hydrogen sulphide, H_{2}S,

notwithstanding the fact that the affinity of hydrogen sulphide, as an

acid, for lime, CaH_{2}O_{2}, as a base, causes them to react on each

other, forming calcium sulphide and water, CaS + 2H_{2}O. Furthermore,

Rose showed that the greater the amount of water acting on the calcium

sulphide, the more complete is the decomposition. The results of this

reaction are evident from the fact that the hydrogen sulphide formed

may be expelled from the solution by heating, and that the resulting

lime is sparingly soluble in water. Rose clearly saw from this that such

feeble agents, in a chemical sense, as carbonic anhydride and water, by

acting in a mass and for long periods of time in nature on the durable

rocks, which resist the action of the most powerful acids, are able

to bring about chemical change--to extract, for example, from rocks

the bases, lime, soda, potash. The influence of the mass of water on

antimonious chloride, bismuth nitrate, &c., is essentially of the same

character. These substances give up to the water a quantity of acid

which is greater in proportion as the mass of the water acting on them

is greater.[25 bis]

[25] H. Rose is more especially known for his having carefully studied

and perfected several methods for the exact chemical analysis of

many mineral substances. His predecessor in this branch of

research was Berzelius, and his successor Fresenius.

[25 bis] Historically the influence of the mass of water was the first

well-observed phenomenon in support of Berthollet's teaching, and

it should not now be forgotten. In double decompositions taking

place in dilute solutions where the mass of water is large, its

influence, notwithstanding the weakness of affinities, must he

great, according to the very essence of Berthollet's doctrine.

As explaining the action of the mass of water, the experiments of

Pattison Muir (1879) are very instructive. These experiments

demonstrate that the decomposition of bismuth chloride is the more

complete the greater the relative quantity of water, and the less

the mass of hydrochloric acid forming one of the products of the

reaction.

Barium sulphate, BaSO_{4}, which is insoluble in water, when fused with

sodium carbonate, Na_{2}CO_{3}, gives, but not completely, barium

carbonate, BaCO_{3}, (also insoluble), and sodium sulphate, Na_{2}SO_{4}.

If a solution of sodium carbonate acts on precipitated barium sulphate,

the same decomposition is also effected (Dulong, Rose), but it is

restricted by a limit and requires time. A mixture of sodium carbonate

and sulphate is obtained in the solution and a mixture of barium

carbonate and sulphate in the precipitate. If the solution be decanted

off and a fresh solution of sodium carbonate be poured over the

precipitate, then a fresh portion of the barium sulphate passes into

barium carbonate, and so by increasing the mass of sodium carbonate it is

possible to entirely convert the barium sulphate into barium carbonate.

If a definite quantity of sodium sulphate be added to the solution of

sodium carbonate, then the latter will have no action whatever on the

barium sulphate, because then a system in equilibrium determined by the

reverse action of the sodium sulphate on the barium carbonate and by the

presence of both sodium carbonate and sulphate in the solution, is at

once arrived at. On the other hand, if the mass of the sodium sulphate in

the solution be great, then the barium carbonate is reconverted into

sulphate until a definite state of equilibrium is attained between the

two opposite reactions, producing barium carbonate by the action of the

sodium carbonate and barium sulphate by the action of the sodium

sulphate.

Another most important principle of Berthollet's teaching is the

existence of _a limit of exchange decomposition_, or _the attainment

of a state of equilibrium_. In this respect the determinations of

Malaguti (1857) are historically the most important. He took a mixture

of solutions of equivalent quantities of two salts, MX and NY, and

judged the amount of the resulting exchange from the composition of the

precipitate produced by the addition of alcohol. When, for example, zinc

sulphate and sodium chloride (ZnSO_{4} and 2NaCl) were taken, there

were produced by exchange sodium sulphate and zinc chloride. A mixture

of zinc sulphate and sodium sulphate was precipitated by an excess of

alcohol, and it appeared from the composition of the precipitate that

72 per cent. of the salts taken had been decomposed. When, however, a

mixture of solutions of sodium sulphate and zinc chloride was taken, the

precipitate presented the same composition as before--that is, about 28

per cent. of the salts taken had been subjected to decomposition. In

a similar experiment with a mixture of sodium chloride and magnesium

sulphate, 2NaCl + MgSO_{4} or MgCl_{2} + Na_{2}SO_{4}, about half of

the metals underwent the decomposition, which may be expressed by

the equation 4NaCl + 2MgSO_{4} = 2NaCl + MgSO_{4} + Na_{2}SO_{4} +

MgCl_{2} = 2Na_{2}SO_{4} + 2MgCl_{2}. A no less clear limit expressed

itself in another of Malaguti's researches when he investigated the

above-mentioned reversible reactions of the insoluble salts of barium.

When, for example, barium carbonate and sodium sulphate (BaCO_{3} +

Na_{2}SO_{4}) were taken, then about 72 per cent. of the salts were

decomposed, that is, were converted into barium sulphate and sodium

carbonate. But when the two latter salts were taken, then about 19

per cent. of them passed into barium carbonate and sodium sulphate.

Probably the end of the reaction was not reached in either case, because

this would require a considerable time and a uniformity of conditions

attainable with difficulty.

Gladstone (1855) took advantage of the colour of solutions of different

ferric salts for determining the measure of exchange between metals.

Thus a solution of ferric thiocyanate has a most intense red colour, and

by making a comparison between the colour of the resulting solutions and

the colour of solutions of known strength it was possible to judge to a

certain degree the quantity of the thiocyanate formed. This colorimetric

method of determination has an important significance as being the

first in which a method was applied for determining the composition

of a solution without the removal of any of its component parts. When

Gladstone took equivalent quantities of ferric nitrate and potassium

thiocyanate--Fe(NO_{3})_{3} + 3KCNS--only 13 per cent. of the salts

underwent decomposition. On increasing the mass of the latter salt the

quantity of ferric thiocyanate formed increased, but even when more than

300 equivalents of potassium thiocyanate were taken a portion of the

iron still remained as nitrate. It is evident that the affinity acting

between Fe and NO_{3} and between K and CNS on the one hand, is greater

than the affinity acting between Fe and CNS, together with the affinity

of K for NO_{3}, on the other hand. The investigation of the variation

of the fluorescence of quinine sulphate, as well as the variation of the

rotation of the plane of polarisation of nicotine, gave in the hands

of Gladstone many proofs of the entire applicability of Berthollet's

doctrine, and in particular demonstrated the influence of mass which

forms the chief distinctive feature of the teaching of Berthollet,

teaching little appreciated in his own time.

At the beginning of the year 1860, the doctrine of the limit of reaction

and of the influence of mass on the process of chemical transformations

received a very important support in the researches of Berthelot and

P. de Saint-Gilles on the formation of the ethereal salts RX from the

alcohols ROH and acids HX, when water is also formed. This conversion is

essentially very similar to the formation of salts, but differs in that

it proceeds slowly at the ordinary temperature, extending over whole

years, and is not complete--that is, it has a distinct limit determined

by a reverse reaction; thus an ethereal salt RX with water gives an

alcohol ROH and an acid HX--up to that limit generally corresponding

with two-thirds of the alcohol taken, if the action proceed between

molecular quantities of alcohol and acid. Thus common alcohol,

C_{2}H_{5}OH, with acetic acid, HC_{2}H_{3}O_{2}, gives the following

system rapidly when heated, or slowly at the ordinary temperature, ROH

+ HX + 2RX + 2H_{2}O, whether we start from 3RHO + 3HX or from 3RX +

3H_{2}O. The process and completion of the reaction in this instance

are very easily observed, because the quantity of free acid is easily

determined from the amount of alkali requisite for its saturation, as

neither alcohol nor ethereal salt acts on litmus or other reagent for

acids. Under the influence of an increased mass of alcohol the reaction

proceeds further. If two molecules of alcohol, RHO, be taken for every

one molecule of acetic acid, HX, then instead of 66 p.c., 83 p.c. of

the acid passes into ethereal salt, and with fifty molecules of RHO

nearly all the acid is etherised. The researches of Menschutkin in their

details touched on many important aspects of the same subject, such as

the influence of the composition of the alcohol and acid on the limit

and rate of exchange--but these, as well as other details, must be

looked for in special treatises on organic and theoretical chemistry.

In any case the study of etherification has supplied chemical mechanics

with clear and valuable data, which directly confirm the two fundamental

propositions of Berthollet; the influence of mass, and the limit of

reaction--that is, the equilibrium between opposite reactions. The study

of numerous instances of dissociation which we have already touched on,

and shall again meet with on several occasions, gave the same results.

With respect to double saline decompositions, it is also necessary to

mention the researches of Wiedemann on the decomposing action of a mass

of water on the ferric salts, which could be determined by measuring the

magnetism of the solutions, because the ferric oxide (soluble colloid)

set free by the water is less magnetic than the ferric salts.

A very important epoch in the history of Berthollet's doctrine was

attained when, in 1867, the Norwegian chemists, Guldberg and Waage,

expressed it as an algebraical formula. They defined the active mass

as the number of molecules contained in a given volume, and assumed,

as follows from the spirit of Berthollet's teaching, that the action

between the substances was equal to the product of the masses of the

reacting substances. Hence if the salts MX and NY be taken in equivalent

quantities (_m_ = 1 and _n_ = 1) and the salts MY and NX are not

added to the mixture but proceed from it, then if _k_ represent the

coefficient of the rate of the action of MX on NY and if _k_´ represent

the same coefficient for the pair MY and NX, then we shall have at the

moment when the decomposition equals x a measure of action for the first

pair: _k_(1-_x_)(1-_x_) and for the second pair _k´xx_, and a state of

equilibrium or limit will be reached when _k_(1-_x_)^2 = _k_´_x_^2,

whence the ratio _k_/_k_´ = [_x_/(1-_x_)]^2. Therefore in the case of

the action of alcohol on an acid, when _x_ = 2/3, the magnitude _k_/_k_´

= 4, that is, the reaction of the alcohol on the acid is four times as

fast as that of the ethereal salt on water. If the ratio _k_/_k_´ be

known, then the influence of mass may be easily determined from it. Thus

if instead of one molecule of alcohol two be taken, then the equation

will be _k_(2-_x_)(1-_x_) = _k´xx_, whence _x_ = 0·85 or 85 percent.,

which is close to the result of experiment. If 300 molecules of alcohol

be taken, then x proves to be approximately 100 per cent., which is also

found to be the case by experiment.[26]

[26] From the above it follows that an excess of acid should influence

the reaction like an excess of alcohol. It is in fact shown by

experiment that if two molecules of acetic acid be taken to one

molecule of alcohol, 84 p.c. of alcohol is etherified. If with a

large preponderance of acid or of alcohol certain discrepancies

are observed, their cause must be looked for in the incomplete

correspondence of the conditions and external influences.

But it is impossible to subject the formation of salts to any process

directly analogous to that which is so conveniently effected in

etherification. Many efforts have, however, been made to solve the

problem of the measure of reaction in this case also. Thus, for example,

Khichinsky (1866), Petrieff (1885), and many others investigated the

distribution of metals and haloid groups in the case of one metal and

several haloids taken in excess, as acids; or conversely with an excess

of bases, the distribution of these bases with relation to an acid; in

cases where a portion of the substances forms a precipitate and a portion

remains in solution. But such complex cases, although they in general

confirm Berthollet's teaching (for instance, a solution of silver nitrate

gives some silver oxide with lead oxide, and a solution of nitrate of

lead precipitates some lead oxide under the action of silver oxide, as

Petrieff demonstrated), still, owing to the complexity of the phenomena

(for instance, the formation of basic and double salts), they cannot give

simple results. But much more instructive and complete are researches

like those made by Pattison Muir (1876), who took the simple case of the

precipitation of calcium carbonate, CaCO_{3}, from the mixture of

solutions of calcium chloride and sodium or potassium carbonate, and

found in this case that not only was the rate of action (for example, in

the case of CaCl_{2} + Na_{2}CO_{3}, 75 per cent. of CaCO_{3} was

precipitated in five minutes, 85 per cent. in thirty minutes, and 94 per

cent. in two days) determined by the temperature, relative mass, and

amount of water (a large mass of water decreases the rate), but that the

limit of decomposition was also dependent on these influences. However,

even in researches of this kind the conditions of reaction are

complicated by the non-uniformity of the media, inasmuch as a portion of

the substance is obtained or remains in the form of a precipitate, so

that the system is heterogeneous. The investigation of double saline

decompositions offers many difficulties which cannot be considered as yet

entirely overcome. Although many efforts have long since been made, the

majority of the researches were carried on in aqueous solutions, and as

water is itself a saline compound and able to combine with salts and

enter into double decomposition with them, such reactions taking place in

solutions in reality present very complex cases.[27] In this sense the

reaction between alcohols and acids is much more simple, and therefore

its significance in confirmation of Berthollet's doctrine is of

particular importance. The only cases which can be compared with these

reactions for simplicity are those exchange decompositions investigated

by G. G. Gustavson, which take place between CCl_{4} and RBr_{n} on the

one hand, and CBr_{4} and RCl_{n} on the other. This case is convenient

for investigation inasmuch as the RCl_{n} and RBr_{n} taken (such as

BCl_{3}, SiCl_{4}, TiCl_{4}, POCl_{3}, and SnCl_{4}) belong to those

substances which are decomposed by water, whilst CCl_{4} and CBr_{4} are

not decomposed by water; and therefore, by heating, for instance, a

mixture of CCl_{4} + SiBr_{4} it is possible to arrive at a conclusion as

to the amount of interchange by treating the product with water, which

decomposes the SiBr_{4} left unchanged and the SiCl_{4} formed by the

exchange, and therefore by determining the composition of the product

acted on by the water it is possible to form a conclusion as to the

amount of decomposition. The mixture was always formed with equivalent

quantities--for instance, 4BCl_{3} + 3CBr_{4}. It appeared that there was

no exchange whatever on simple intermixture, but that it proceeded

slowly, when the mixture was heated (for example, with the mixture above

mentioned at 123° 4·86 per cent. of Cl was replaced by Br after 14 days'

heating, and 6·83 per cent. after 28 days, and 10·12 per cent. when

heated at 150° for 60 days). A limit was always reached which

corresponded with that of the complemental system; in the given instance

the system 4BBr_{3} + 3CCl_{4}. In this last 89·97 per cent. of bromine

in the BBr_{3} was replaced by chlorine; that is, there were obtained

89·97 molecules of BCl_{3} and there remained 10·02 molecules of BBr_{3},

and therefore the same state of equilibrium was reached as that given by

the system 4BCl_{3} + 3CBr_{4}. Both systems gave one and the same state

of equilibrium at the limit, which is in agreement with Berthollet's

doctrine.[28]

[27] As an example two methods may be mentioned, Thomsen's and

Ostwald's. Thomsen (1869) applied a thermochemical method to

exceedingly dilute solutions without taking the water into further

consideration. He took solutions of caustic soda containing

100H_{2}O per NaHO, and sulphuric acid containing 1/2H_{2}SO_{4} +

100H_{2}O. In order that these solutions may be mixed in such

quantities that atomic proportions of acid and alkali would act,

for forty grams of caustic soda (which answers to its equivalent)

there should be employed 49 grams of sulphuric acid, and then

+15,689 heat units would be evolved. If the normal sodium sulphate

so formed be mixed with _n_ equivalents of sulphuric acid, a

certain amount of heat is absorbed, namely a quantity equal to

(_n_.1650)/(_n_ + 0·8) heat units. An equivalent of caustic soda,

in combining with an equivalent of nitric acid, evolves +13,617

units of heat, and the augmentation of the amount of nitric acid

entails an absorption of heat for each equivalent equal to -27

units; so also in combining with hydrochloric acids +13,740 heat

units are absorbed, and for each equivalent of hydrochloric acid

beyond this amount there are absorbed -32 heat units. Thomsen mixed

each one of three neutral salts, sodium sulphate, sodium chloride

and sodium nitrate, with an acid which is not contained in it; for

instance, he mixed a solution of sodium sulphate with a solution

of nitric acid and determined the number of heat units then

absorbed. An absorption of heat ensued because a normal salt was

taken in the first instance, and the mixture of all the above

normal salts with acid produces an absorption of heat. The amount

of heat absorbed enabled him to obtain an insight into the process

taking place in this mixture, for sulphuric acid added to sodium

sulphate absorbs a considerable quantity of heat, whilst

hydrochloric and nitric acids absorb a very small amount of heat

in this case. By mixing an equivalent of sodium sulphate with

various numbers of equivalents of nitric acid, Thomsen observed

that the amount of heat absorbed increased more and more as the

amount of nitric acid was increased; thus when HNO_{3} was taken

per 1/2Na_{2}SO_{4}, 1,752 heat units were absorbed per equivalent

of soda contained in the sodium sulphate. When twice as much

nitric acid was taken, 2,026 heat units, and when three times as

much, 2,050 heat units were absorbed. Had the double decomposition

been complete in the case where one equivalent of nitric acid was

taken per equivalent of Na_{2}SO_{4} then according to calculation

from similar data there should have been absorbed -2,989 units of

heat, while in reality only -1,752 units were absorbed. Hence

Thomsen concluded that a displacement of only about two-thirds of

the sulphuric acid had taken place--that is, the ratio _k_ : _k_´

for the reaction 1/2Na_{2}SO_{4} + HNO_{3} and NaNO_{3} +

1/2H_{2}SO_{4} is equal, as for ethereal salts, to 4. By taking

this figure and admitting the above supposition, Thomsen found

that for all mixtures of soda with nitric acid, and of sodium

nitrate with sulphuric acid, the amounts of heat followed Guldberg

and Waage's law; that is, the limit of decomposition reached was

greater the greater the mass of acid added. The relation of

hydrochloric to sulphuric acid gave the same results. Therefore

the researches of Thomsen fully confirm the hypotheses of Guldberg

and Waage and the doctrine of Berthollet.

The Principles of Chemistry, Volume I · 第 15 / 21 章