the formation of solutions is not large, so, owing to the
insufficient accuracy of observations, a proportionality between
this change and a change of composition may, in a first rough
approximation and especially within narrow limits of change
of composition, easily be imagined in cases where it does not
even exist. The conclusion of Michel and Kraft is particularly
instructive in this respect; in 1854, on the basis of their
incomplete researches, they supposed that the increment of the
specific gravity of solutions was proportional to the increment
of a salt in a given volume of a solution, which is only true
for determinations of specific gravity which are exact to
the second decimal place--an accuracy insufficient even for
technical determinations. Accurate measurements do not confirm
a proportionality either in this case or in many others where
a ratio has been generally accepted; as, for example, for the
rotatory power (with respect to the plane of polarisation)
of solutions, and for their capillarity, &c. Nevertheless,
such a method is not only still made use of, but even has its
advantages when applied to solutions within a limited scope--as,
for instance, very weak solutions, and for a first acquaintance
with the phenomena accompanying solution, and also as a means
for facilitating the application of mathematical analysis to
the investigation of the phenomenon of solution. Judging by the
results obtained in my researches on the specific gravity of
solutions, I think that in many cases it would be nearer the
truth to take the change of properties as proportional, not to
the amount of a substance dissolved, but to the product of this
quantity and the amount of water in which it is dissolved; the
more so since many chemical relations vary in proportion to the
reacting masses, and a similar ratio has been established for
many phenomena of attraction studied by mechanics. This product
is easily arrived at when the quantity of water in the solutions
to be compared is constant, as is shown in investigating the fall
of temperature in the formation of ice (_see_ footnote 49, p. 91).
[45] All the different forms of chemical reaction may be said to take
place in the process of solution. (1) _Combinations_ between
the solvent and the substance dissolved, which are more or less
stable (more or less dissociated). This form of reaction is the
most probable, and is that most often observed. (2) Reactions
of _substitution_ or of _double decomposition_ between the
molecules. Thus it may be supposed that in the solution of
sal ammoniac, NH_{4}Cl, the action of water produces ammonia,
NH_{4}HO, and hydrochloric acid, HCl, which are dissolved in
the water and simultaneously attract each other. As these
solutions and many others do indeed exhibit signs, which are
sometimes indisputable, of similar double decompositions (thus
solutions of sal-ammoniac yield a certain amount of ammonia),
it is probable that this form of reaction is more often met
with than is generally thought. (3) Reactions of _isomerism_ or
_replacement_ are also probably met with in solution, all the
more as here molecules of different kinds come into intimate
contact, and it is very likely that the configuration of the
atoms in the molecules under these influences is somewhat
different from what it was in its original and isolated state.
One is led to this supposition especially from observations made
on solutions of substances which rotate the plane of polarisation
(and observations of this kind are very sensitive with respect
to the atomic structure of molecules), because they show, for
example (according to Schneider, 1881), that strong solutions
of malic acid rotate the plane of polarisation to the right,
whilst its ammonium salts in all degrees of concentration
rotate the plane of polarisation to the left. (4) Reactions of
_decomposition_ under the influences of solution are not only
rational in themselves, but have in recent years been recognised
by Arrhenius, Ostwald, and others, particularly on the basis of
electrolytic determinations. If a portion of the molecules of a
solution occur in a condition of decomposition, the other portion
may occur in a yet more complex state of combination, just as the
velocity of the motion of different gaseous molecules may be far
from being the same (_see_ Note 34, p. 81).
It is, therefore, very probable that the reactions taking place
in solution vary both quantitatively and qualitatively with
the mass of water in the solution, and the great difficulty
in arriving at a definite conclusion as to the nature of the
chemical relations which take place in the process of solution
will be understood, and if besides this the existence of a
physical process, like the sliding between and interpenetration
of two homogeneous liquids, be also recognised in solution,
then the complexity of the problem as to the actual nature of
solutions, which is now to the fore, appears in its true light.
However, the efforts which are now being applied to the solution
of this problem are so numerous and of such varied aspect that
they will afford future investigators a vast mass of material
towards the construction of a complete theory of solution.
For my part, I am of opinion that the study of the physical
properties of solutions (and especially of weak ones) which now
obtains, cannot give any fundamental and complete solution of
the problem whatever (although it should add much to both the
provinces of physics and chemistry), but that, parallel with it,
should be undertaken the study of the influence of temperature,
and especially of low temperatures, the application to solutions
of the mechanical theory of heat, and the comparative study of
the chemical properties of solutions. The beginning of all this
is already established, but it is impossible to consider in so
short an exposition of chemistry the further efforts of this kind
which have been made up to the present date.
The feeble development of the chemical affinities acting in solutions of
solids becomes evident from those multifarious methods by which _their
solutions are decomposed_, whether they be saturated or not. On heating
(absorption of heat), on cooling, and by internal forces alone, aqueous
solutions in many cases separate into their components or their definite
compounds with water. The water contained in solutions is removed
from them as vapour, or, by freezing, in the form of ice,[46] but the
_tension of the vapour of water_[47] held in solution is less than
that of water in a free state, and the _temperature of the formation
of ice_ from solutions is lower than 0°. Further, both the diminution
of vapour tension and the lowering of the freezing point proceed, in
dilute solutions, almost in proportion to the amount of a substance
dissolved.[48] Thus, if per 100 grams of water there be in solution
1, 5, 10 grams of common salt (NaCl), then at 100° the vapour tension
of the solutions decreases by 4, 21, 43 mm. of the barometric column,
against 760 mm., or the vapour tension of water, whilst the freezing
points are -0·58°, -2·91°, and -6·10° respectively. The above figures[49]
are almost proportional to the amounts of salt in solution (1, 5, and
10 per 100 of water). Furthermore, it has been shown by experiment that
the ratio of the diminution of vapour tension to the vapour tension
of water at different temperatures in a given solution is an almost
constant quantity,[50] and that for every (dilute) solution the ratio
between the diminution of vapour tension and of the freezing point is
also a tolerably constant quantity.[51]
[46] If solutions are regarded as being in a state of dissociation
(_see_ footnote 19, p. 64) it would be expected that they would
contain free molecules of water, which form one of the products
of the decomposition of those definite compounds whose formation
is the cause of solution. In separating as ice or vapour, water
makes, with a solution, a heterogeneous system (made up of
substances in different physical states) similar, for instance,
to the formation of a precipitate or volatile substance in
reactions of double decomposition.
[47] If the substance dissolved is non-volatile (like salt or sugar),
or only slightly volatile, then the whole of the tension of
the vapour given off is due to the water, but if a solution
of a volatile substance--for instance, a gas or a volatile
liquid--evaporates, then only a portion of the pressure belongs
to the water, and the whole pressure observed consists of the sum
of the pressures of the vapours of the water and of the substance
dissolved. The majority of researches bear on the first case,
which will be spoken of presently, and the observations of D. P.
Konovaloff (1881) refer to the second case. He showed that in the
case of two volatile liquids, mutually soluble in each other,
forming two layers of saturated solutions (for example, ether
and water, Note 20, p. 67), both solutions have an equal vapour
tension (in the case in point the tension of both is equal to 431
mm. of mercury at 19·8°). Further, he found that for solutions
which are formed in all proportions, the tension is either
greater (solutions of alcohol and water) or less (solutions of
formic acid) than that which answers to the rectilinear change
(proportional to the composition) from the tension of water
to the tension of the substance dissolved; thus, the tension,
for example, of a 70 p.c. solution of formic acid is less, at
all temperatures, than the tension of water and of formic acid
itself. In this case the tension of a solution is never equal to
the sum of the tensions of the dissolving liquids, as Regnault
already showed when he distinguished this case from that in
which a mixture of liquids, which are insoluble in each other,
evaporates. From this it is evident that a mutual action occurs
in solution, which diminishes the vapour tensions proper to the
individual substances, as would be expected on the supposition of
the formation of compounds in solutions, because the elasticity
then always diminishes.
[48] This amount is usually expressed by the weight of the substance
dissolved per 100 parts by weight of water. Probably it would
be better to express it by the quantity of the substance in a
definite volume of the solution--for instance, in a litre--or
by the ratios of the number of molecules of water and of the
substance dissolved.
[49] The variation of the vapour tension of solutions has been
investigated by many. The best known researches are those of
Wüllner in Germany (1858-1860) and of Tamman in Russia (1887).
The researches on the temperature of the formation of ice from
various solutions are also very numerous; Blagden (1788),
Rüdorff (1861), and De Coppet (1871) established the beginning,
but this kind of investigation takes its chief interest from
the work of Raoult, begun in 1882 on aqueous solutions, and
afterwards continued for solutions in various other easily frozen
liquids--for instance, benzene, C_{6}H_{6} (melts at 4·96°),
acetic acid, C_{2}H_{4}O_{2} (16·75°), and others. An especially
important interest is attached to these cryoscopic investigations
of Raoult in France on the depression of the freezing point,
because he took solutions of many well-known carbon-compounds
and discovered a simple relation between the molecular weight
of the substances and the temperature of crystallisation of the
solvent, which enabled this kind of research to be applied to
the investigation of the nature of substances. We shall meet
with the application of this method later on (_see also_ Chapter
VII.), and at present will only cite the deduction arrived at
from these results. The solution of one-hundredth part of that
molecular gram weight which corresponds with the formula of a
substance dissolved (for example, NaCl = 58·5, C_{2}H_{6}O = 46,
&c.) in 100 parts of a solvent lowers the freezing point of its
solution in water 0·185°, in benzene 0·49°, and in acetic acid
O·39°, or twice as much as with water. And as in weak solutions
the depression or fall of freezing point is proportional to the
amount of the substance dissolved, it follows that the fall of
freezing point for all other solutions may be calculated from
this rule. So, for instance, the weight which corresponds with
the formula of acetone, C_{3}H_{6}O is 58; a solution containing
2·42, 6·22, and 12·35 grams of acetone per 100 grams of water,
forms ice (according to the determinations of Beckmann) at
0·770°, 1·930°, and 3·820°, and these figures show that with
a solution containing 0·58 gram of acetone per 100 of water
the fall of the temperature of the formation of ice will be
0·185°, 0·180°, and 0·179°. It must be remarked that the law of
proportionality between the fall of temperature of the formation
of ice, and the composition of a solution, is in general only
approximate, and is only applicable to weak solutions (Pickering
and others).
We will here remark that the theoretical interest of this subject
was strengthened on the discovery of the connection existing
between the fall of tension, the fall of the temperature of the
formation of ice, of osmotic pressure (Van't Hoff, Note 19),
and of the electrical conductivity of solutions, and we will
therefore supplement what we have already said on the subject by
some short remarks on the method of cryoscopic investigations,
although the details of the subject form the subject of more
special works on physical chemistry (such as Ostwald's _Lehrbuch
der allgemeinen Chemie_, 1891-1894, 2 vols.)
In order to determine the _temperature of the formation of
ice_ (or of crystallisation of other solvents), a solution
of known strength is prepared and poured into a cylindrical
vessel surrounded by a second similar vessel, leaving a layer
of air between the two, which, being a bad conductor, prevents
any rapid change of temperature. The bulb of a sensitive and
corrected thermometer is immersed in the solution, and also a
bent platinum wire for stirring the solution; the whole is then
cooled (by immersing the apparatus in a freezing mixture), and
the temperature at which ice begins to separate observed. If
the temperature at first falls slightly lower, it nevertheless
becomes constant when ice begins to form. By then allowing the
liquid to get just warm, and again observing the temperature of
the formation of ice, an exact determination may be arrived at.
It is still better to take a large mass of solution, and induce
the formation of the first crystals by dropping a small lump
of ice into the solution already partially over-cooled. This
only imperceptibly changes the composition of the solution. The
observation should be made at the point of formation of only a
very small amount of crystals, as otherwise the composition of
the solution will become altered from their separation. Every
precaution must be taken to prevent the access of moisture to the
interior of the apparatus, which might also alter the composition
of the solution or properties of the solvent (for instance, when
using acetic acid).
With respect to the depression of dilute solutions it is
known--(1) That the depression increases in almost direct
proportion to the amount of the substance in solution (always
per 100 parts of water), for example, for KCl when the solution
contains 1 part of salt (per 100 parts of water) the depression =
0·45°, when the solution contains 2 parts of salt = 0·90°, with
10 parts of salt = 4·4°. (2) The greater the molecular weight
expressed by the formula (see Chapter VII.), and designated
by M, the less, under other similar conditions, will be the
depression _d_, and therefore if the concentration of a solution
(the amount by weight of substance dissolved per 100 parts of
water) be designated by _p_, then the fraction M_d_/_p_ or the
molecular depression for a given class of substances will be a
constant quantity; for example, in the case of methyl alcohol in
water 17·3, for acetone about 18·0, for sugar about 18·5. (3) In
general the molecular depression for substances whose solutions
do not conduct an electric current is about 18·5, while for
acids, salts, and such like substances whose solutions do conduct
electricity, it is _i_ times greater; for instance, for HCl, KI,
HNO_{3}, KHO, &c., about 36 (_i_ is nearly 2), for borax about
66, and so on where _i_ varies in the same manner as it does in
the case of the osmotic pressure of solutions (Note 19). (4)
Different solvents (water, acetic acid, benzene, &c.) have each
their corresponding constants of molecular depression (which have
a certain remote connection with their molecular weight); for
example, for acetic acid the molecular depression is about 39 and
not 19 (as it is for water), for benzene 49, for methyl alcohol
about 17, &c. (5) If the molecular weight M of a substance be
unknown, then in the case of non-conductors of electricity or for
a given group, it may be found by determining the depression,
_d_, for a given concentration, _p_; for example, in the case of
peroxide of hydrogen, which is a non-conductor of electricity,
the molecular weight, M, was found to be nearly 34, _i.e._ equal
to H_{2}O_{2}.
Similar results have also been found for the fall in the
vapour tension of solutions (Note 51), and for the rise of
their boiling points (hence these data may also serve for
determining the molecular weight of a substance in solution,
as is shortly described in Chapter VII., Note 27 bis). And as
these conclusions are also applicable in the case of osmotic
pressure (Note 19), and a variation in the magnitude of _i_, in
passing from solutions which do not conduct an electric current
to those which do conduct electricity is everywhere remarked,
so it was natural to here seek that causal connection which
Arrhenius (1888), Ostwald, and others expected to find in the
supposition that a portion of the substance of the electrolyte
is already decomposed in the very act of solution, into its
ions (for example, NaCl into Na and Cl), or into the atoms of
those individual substances which make their appearance in
electrolysis, and in this way to explain the fact that _i_ is
greater for those bodies which conduct an electric current.
We will not consider here this supposition, known as the
hypothesis of 'electrolytic dissociation,' not only because
it wholly belongs to that special branch--physical chemistry,
and gives scarcely any help towards explaining the chemical
relations of solutions (particularly their passage into definite
compounds, their reactions, and their very formation), but
also because--(1) all the above data (for constant depression,
osmotic pressure, &c.) only refer to dilute solutions, and are
not applicable to strong solutions; whilst the chemical interest
in strong solutions is not less than in dilute solutions, and
the transition from the former into the latter is consecutive
and inevitable; (2) because in all homogeneous bodies (although
it may be insoluble and not an electrolyte) a portion of the
atoms may he supposed (Clausius) to be passing from one particle
to another (Chapter X., Note 28), and as it were dissociated,
but there are no reasons for believing that such a phenomenon
is proper to the solutions of electrolytes only; (3) because no
essential mark of difference is observed between the solution of
electrolytes and non-conductors, although it might be expected
there would be according to Arrhenius' hypothesis; (4) because it
is most reasonable to suppose the formation of new, more complex,
but unstable and easily dissociated compounds in the act of
solution, than a decomposition, even partial, of the substances
taken; (5) because if Arrhenius' hypothesis be accepted it
becomes necessary to admit the existence in solutions of free
ions, like the atoms Cl or Na, without any apparent expenditure
of the energy necessary for their disruption, and if in this case
it can be explained why _i_ then = 2, it is not at all clear why
solutions of MgSO_{4} give _i_ = 1, although the solution does
conduct an electric current; (6) because in dilute solutions,
the approximative proportionality between the depression and
concentration may be recognised, while admitting the formation
of hydrates, with as much right as in admitting the solution
of anhydrous substances, and if the formation of hydrates be
recognised it is easier to admit that a portion of these hydrates
is decomposed than to accept the breaking-up into ions; (7)
because the best conductors of electricity are solutions like the
sulphates in which it is necessary to recognise the formation
of associated systems or hydrates; (8) because the cause of
electro-conductivity can be sooner looked for in this affinity
and this combination of the substance dissolved with the solvent,
as is seen from the fact, that (D. P. Konovaloff) neither aniline
nor acetic acid alone conduct an electric current, a solution
of aniline in water conducts it badly (and here the affinity is
very small), while a solution of aniline in acetic acid forms a
good electrolyte, in which, without doubt, chemical forces are
acting, bringing aniline, like ammonia, into combination with the
acetic acid; which is evident from the researches made by Prof.
Konovaloff upon mixtures (solutions) of aniline and other amines;
and, lastly, (9) because I, together with many of the chemists
of the present day, cannot regard the hypothesis of electrolytic
dissociation in the form given to it up to now by Arrhenius and
Ostwald, as answering to the sum total of the chemical data
respecting solutions and dissociation in general. Thus, although
I consider it superfluous to discuss further the evolution of
the above theory of solutions, still I think that it would he
most useful for students of chemistry to consider all the data
referring to this subject, which can be found in the _Zeitschrift
für physikalische Chemie_, 1888-1894.
[50] This fact, which was established by Gay-Lussac, Pierson, and
v. Babo, is confirmed by the latest observations, and enables us
to express not only the fall of tension (_p_-_p_´) itself, but
its ratio to the tension of water (_p_-_p_´)/_p_. It is to be
remarked that in the absence of any chemical action, the fall of
pressure is either very small, or does not exist at all (note
33), and is not proportional to the quantity of the substance
added. As a rule, the tension is then equal, according to the law
of Dalton, to the sum of the tensions of the substances taken.
Hence liquids which are insoluble in each other (for example,
water and chloride of carbon) present a tension equal to the sum
of their individual tensions, and therefore such a mixture boils
at a lower temperature than the more volatile liquid (Magnus,
Regnault).
[51] If, in the example of common salt, the fall of tension be divided
by the tension of water, a figure is obtained which is nearly
105 times less than the magnitude of the fall of temperature of
formation of ice. This correlation was theoretically deduced
by Goldberg, on the basis of the application of the mechanical
theory of heat, and is repeated by many investigated solutions.
The diminution of the vapour tension of solutions explains the rise in
boiling point due to the solution of solid non-volatile bodies in water.
The temperature of a vapour is the same as that of the solution from
which it is generated, and therefore it follows that the aqueous vapour
given off from a solution will be superheated. A saturated solution
of common salt boils at 108·4°, a solution of 335 parts of nitre in
100 parts of water at 115·9°, and a solution of 325 parts of potassium
chloride in 100 parts of water at 179°, if the temperature of ebullition
be determined by immersing the thermometer bulb in the liquid itself.
This is another proof of the bond which exists between water and the
substance dissolved. And this bond is seen still more clearly in those
cases (for example, in the solution of nitric or formic acid in water)
where the solution boils at a higher temperature than either water or
the volatile substance dissolved in it. For this reason the solutions of
certain gases--for instance, hydriodic or hydrochloric acid--boil above
100°.
The separation of ice from solutions[52] explains both the phenomenon,
well known to sailors, that the ice formed from salt water gives fresh
water, and also the fact that by freezing, just as by evaporation, a
solution is obtained which is richer in salts than before. This is taken
advantage of in cold countries for obtaining a liquor from sea water,
which is then evaporated for the extraction of salt.
[52] Fritzsche showed that solutions of certain colouring matters yield
colourless ice, which clearly proves the passage of water only
into a solid state, without any intermixture of the substance
dissolved, although the possibility of the admixture in certain
other cases cannot be denied.
On the removal of part of the water from a solution (by evaporation
or the separation of ice), a saturated solution should be obtained,
and then the solid substance dissolved should separate out. Solutions
saturated at a certain temperature should also separate out a
corresponding portion of the substance dissolved if they be reduced,
by cooling,[53] to a temperature at which the water can no longer hold
the former quantity of the substance in solution. If this separation,
by cooling a saturated solution or by evaporation, take place slowly,
_crystals_ of the substance dissolved are in many cases formed; and
this is the method by which crystals of soluble salts are usually
obtained. Certain solids very easily separate out from their solutions
in perfectly formed crystals, which may attain very large dimensions.
Such are nickel sulphate, alum, sodium carbonate, chrome-alum, copper
sulphate, potassium ferricyanide, and a whole series of other salts.
The most remarkable circumstance in this is that many solids in
separating out from an aqueous solution retain a portion of water,
forming crystallised solid substances which contain water. A portion
of the water previously in the solution remains in the separated
crystals. The water which is thus retained is called the _water of
crystallisation_. Alum, copper sulphate, Glauber's salt, and magnesium
sulphate contain such water, but neither sal-ammoniac, table salt,
nitre, potassium chlorate, silver nitrate, nor sugar, contains any
water of crystallisation. One and the same substance may separate out
from a solution with or without water of crystallisation, according
to the temperature at which the crystals are formed. Thus common salt
in crystallising from its solution in water at the ordinary or at a
higher temperature does not contain water of crystallisation. But if
its separation from the solution takes place at a low temperature,
namely below -5°, then the crystals contain 38 parts of water in 100
parts. Crystals of the same substance which separate out at different
temperatures may contain different amounts of water of crystallisation.
This proves to us that a solid dissolved in water may form various
compounds with it, differing in their properties and composition,
and capable of appearing in a solid separate form like many ordinary
definite compounds. This is indicated by the numerous properties and
phenomena connected with solutions, and gives reason for thinking that
there exist in solutions themselves such compounds of the substance
dissolved, and the solvent or compounds similar to them, only in a
liquid partly decomposed form. Even the _colour of solutions_ may
often confirm this opinion. Copper sulphate forms crystals having a
blue colour and containing water of crystallisation. If the water
of crystallisation be removed by heating the crystals to redness, a
colourless anhydrous substance is obtained (a white powder). From this
it may be seen that the blue colour belongs to the compound of the
copper salt with water. Solutions of copper sulphate are all blue, and
consequently they contain a compound similar to the compound formed by
the salt with its water of crystallisation. Crystals of cobalt chloride
when dissolved in an anhydrous liquid--like alcohol, for instance--give
a blue solution, but when they are dissolved in water a red solution is
obtained. Crystals from the aqueous solution, according to Professor
Potilitzin, contain six times as much water (CoCl_{2},6H_{2}O) for a
given weight of the salt, as those violet crystals (CoCl_{2},H_{2}O)
which are formed by the evaporation of an alcoholic solution.
[53] As the solubility of certain substances (for example, coniine,
cerium sulphate, and others) decreases with a rise of temperature
(between certain limits--see, for example, note 24), so these
substances do not separate from their saturated solutions on
cooling but on heating. Thus a solution of manganese sulphate,
saturated at 70°, becomes cloudy on further heating. The point at
which a substance separates from its solution with a change of
temperature gives an easy means of determining the co-efficient
of solubility, and this was taken advantage of by Prof. Alexéeff
for determining the solubility of many substances. The phenomenon
and method of observation are here essentially the same as in
the determination of the temperature of formation of ice. If a
solution of a substance which separates out on heating be taken
(for example, the sulphate of calcium or manganese), then at a
certain fall of temperature ice will separate out from it, and
at a certain rise of temperature the salt will separate out.
From this example, and from general considerations, it is clear
that the separation of a substance dissolved from a solution
should present a certain analogy to the separation of ice from a
solution. In both cases, a heterogeneous system of a solid and a
liquid is formed from a homogeneous (liquid) system.
That solutions contain particular compounds with water is further shown
by the phenomena of supersaturated solutions, of so-called cryohydrates,
of solutions of certain acids having constant boiling points, and the
properties of compounds containing water of crystallisation whose data
it is indispensable to keep in view in the consideration of solutions.
Supersaturated solutions exhibit the following phenomena:--On the
refrigeration of a saturated solution of certain salts,[54] if the
liquid be brought under certain conditions, the excess of the solid
may sometimes remain in solution and not separate out. A great number
of substances, and more especially sodium sulphate, Na_{2}SO_{4}, or
Glauber's salt, easily form supersaturated solutions. If boiling water
be saturated with this salt, and the solution be poured off from any
remaining undissolved salt, and, the boiling being still continued,
the vessel holding the solution be well closed by cotton wool, or by
fusing up the vessel, or by covering the solution with a layer of oil,
then it will he found that this saturated solution does not separate
out any Glauber's salt whatever on cooling down to the ordinary or even
to a much lower temperature; although without the above precautions a
salt separates out on cooling, in the form of crystals, which contain
Na_{2}SO_{4},10H_{2}O--that is, 180 parts of water for 142 parts of
anhydrous salt. The supersaturated solution may be moved about or
shaken inside the vessel holding it, and no crystallisation will take
place; the salt remains in the solution in as large an amount as at a
higher temperature. If the vessel holding the supersaturated solution
be opened and a crystal of Glauber's salt be thrown in, crystallisation
suddenly takes place.[55] A considerable rise in temperature is noticed
during this rapid separation of crystals, which is due to the fact
that the salt, previously in a liquid state, passes into a solid state.
This bears some resemblance to the fact that water maybe cooled below
0° (even to -10°) if it be left at rest, under certain circumstances,
and evolves heat in suddenly crystallising. Although from this point
of view there is a resemblance, yet in reality the phenomenon of
supersaturated solutions is much more complicated. Thus, on cooling,
a saturated solution of Glauber's salt deposits crystals containing
Na_{2}SO_{4},7H_{2}0,[56] or 126 parts of water per 142 parts of
anhydrous salt, and not 180 parts of water, as in the above-mentioned
salt. The crystals containing 7H_{2}O are distinguished for their
instability; if they stand in contact not only with crystals of
Na_{2}SO_{4},10H_{2}O, but with many other substances, they immediately
become opaque, forming a mixture of anhydrous and deca-hydrated salts.
It is evident that between water and a soluble substance there may be
established different kinds of greater or less stable equilibrium, of
which solutions form a particular case.[57]
[54] Those salts which separate out with water of crystallisation and
give several crystallohydrates form supersaturated solutions with
the greatest facility, and the phenomenon is much more common
than was previously imagined. The first data were given in the
last century by Loewitz, in St. Petersburg. Numerous researches
have proved that supersaturated solutions do not differ from
ordinary solutions in any of their essential properties. The
variations in specific gravity, vapour tension, formation of ice,
&c., take place according to the ordinary laws.
[55] Inasmuch as air, as has been shown by direct experiment, contains,
although in very small quantities, minute crystals of salts,
and among them sodium sulphate, air can bring about the
crystallisation of a supersaturated solution of sodium sulphate
in an open vessel, but it has no effect on saturated solutions of
certain other salts; for example, lead acetate. According to the
observations of De Boisbaudran, Gernez, and others, isomorphous
salts (analogous in composition) are capable of inducing
crystallisation. Thus, a supersaturated solution of nickel
sulphate crystallises by contact with crystals of sulphates of
other metals analogous to it, such as those of magnesium, cobalt,
copper, and manganese. The crystallisation of a supersaturated
solution, set up by the contact of a minute crystal, starts from
it in rays with a definite velocity, and it is evident that the
crystals as they form propagate the crystallisation in definite
directions. This phenomenon recalls the evolution of organisms
from germs. An attraction of similar molecules ensues, and they
dispose themselves in definite similar forms.
[56] At the present time a view is very generally accepted, which
regards supersaturated solutions as homogeneous systems, which
pass into heterogeneous systems (composed of a liquid and a
solid substance), in all respects exactly resembling the passage
of water cooled below its freezing point into ice and water,
or the passage of crystals of rhombic sulphur into monoclinic
crystals, and of the monoclinic crystals into rhombic. Although
many phenomena of supersaturation are thus clearly understood,
yet the spontaneous formation of the unstable hepta-hydrated salt
(with 7H_{2}O), in the place of the more stable deca-hydrated
salt (with mol. 10H_{2}O), indicates a property of a saturated
solution of sodium sulphate which obliges one to admit that
it has a different structure from an ordinary solution.
Stcherbacheff asserts, on the basis of his researches, that
a solution of the deca-hydrated salt gives, on evaporation,
without the aid of heat, the deca-hydrated salt, whilst after
heating above 33° it forms a supersaturated solution and the
hepta-hydrated salt. But in order that this view should be
accepted, some facts must be discovered distinguishing solutions
(which are, according to this view, isomeric) containing the
hepta-hydrated salt from those containing the deca-hydrated
salt, and all efforts in this direction (the study of the
properties of the solutions) have given negative results. As
some crystallohydrates of salts (alums, sugar of lead, calcium
chloride) melt straightway (without separating out anything),
whilst others (like Na_{2}SO_{4},10H_{2}O) are broken up, then
it may be that the latter are only in a state of equilibrium at
a higher temperature than their melting point. It may here be
observed that in melting crystals of the deca-hydrated salt,
there is formed, besides the solid anhydrous salt, a saturated
solution giving the hepta-hydrated salt, so that this passage
from the deca-to the hepta-hydrated salt, and the reverse,
takes place with the formation of the anhydrous (or, it may be,
monohydrated) salt.
Moreover, supersaturation (Potilitzin, 1889) only takes
place with those substances which are capable of giving
several modifications or several crystallohydrates, _i.e._
supersaturated solutions separate out, besides the stable normal
crystallohydrate, hydrates containing less water and also the
anhydrous salt. This degree of saturation acts upon the substance
dissolved in a like manner to heat. Sulphate of nickel in a
solution at 15° to 20° separates out rhombic crystals with
7H_{2}O, at 30° to 40° cubical crystals, with 6H_{2}O, at 50° to
70° monoclinic crystals, also containing 6H_{2}O. Crystals of
the same composition separate out from supersaturated solutions
at one temperature (17° to 19°), but at different degrees of
saturation, as was shown by Lecoq de Boisbaudran. The capacity
to voluntarily separate out slightly hydrated or anhydrous salts
by the introduction of a crystal into the solution is common to
all supersaturated solutions. If a salt forms a supersaturated
solution, then one would expect, according to this view, that
it should exist in the form of several hydrates or in several
modifications. Thus Potilitzin concluded that chlorate of
strontium, which easily gives supersaturated solutions, should
be capable of forming several hydrates, besides the anhydrous
salt known; and he succeeded in discovering the existence
of two hydrates, Sr(ClO_{3})_{2},3H_{2}O and apparently
Sr(ClO_{3})_{2},8H_{2}O. Besides this, three modifications of the
common anhydrous salt were obtained, differing from each other
in their crystalline form. One modification separated out in the
form of rhombic octahedra, another in oblique plates, and a third
in long brittle prisms or plates. Further researches showed that
salts which are not capable of forming supersaturated solutions
such as the bromates of calcium, strontium, and barium, part
with their water of hydration with difficulty (they crystallise
with 1H_{2}O), and decompose very slowly in a vacuum or in dry
air. In other words the tension of dissociation is very small
in this class of hydrates. As the hydrates characterised by a
small dissociation tension are incapable of giving supersaturated
solutions, so conversely supersaturated solutions give hydrates
whose tension of dissociation is great (Potilitzin, 1893).
[57] _Emulsions_, like milk, are composed of a solution of glutinous
or similar substances, or of oily liquids suspended in a
liquid in the form of drops, which are clearly visible under a
microscope, and form an example of a mechanical formation which
resembles solution. But the difference from solutions is here
evident. There are, however, solutions which approach very near
to emulsions in the facility with which the substance dissolved
separates from them. It has long been known, for example, that
a particular kind of Prussian blue, KFe_{2}(CN)_{6}, dissolves
in pure water, but, on the addition of the smallest quantity
of either of a number of salts, it coagulates and becomes
quite insoluble. If copper sulphide (CuS), cadmium sulphide
(CdS), arsenic sulphide (As_{2}S_{5}) (the experiments with
these substances proceed with great ease, and the solution
obtained is comparatively stable), and many other metallic
sulphides, be obtained by a method of double decomposition (by
precipitating salts of these metals by hydrogen sulphide),
and be then carefully washed (by allowing the precipitate to
settle, pouring off the liquid, and again adding sulphuretted
hydrogen water), then, as was shown by Schulze, Spring, Prost,
and others, the previously insoluble sulphides pass into
transparent (for mercury, lead, and silver, reddish brown; for
copper and iron, greenish brown; for cadmium and indium, yellow;
and for zinc, colourless) solutions, which may be preserved
(the weaker they are the longer they keep) and even boiled, but
which, nevertheless, in time coagulate--that is, separate in an
insoluble form, and then sometimes become crystalline and quite
incapable of re-dissolving. Graham and others observed the power
shown by colloids (_see_ note 18) of forming similar _hydrosols
or solutions of gelatinous colloids_, and, in describing alumina
and silica, we shall again have occasion to speak of such
solutions.
In the existing state of our knowledge concerning solution, such
solutions may be looked on as a transition between emulsion and
ordinary solutions, but no fundamental judgment can be formed
about them until a study has been made of their relations to
ordinary solutions (the solutions of even soluble colloids freeze
immediately on cooling below 0°, and, according to Guthrie, do
not form cryohydrates), and to supersaturated solutions, with
which they have certain points in common.
Solutions of salts on refrigeration below 0° deposit ice or crystals
(which then frequently contain water of crystallisation) of the salt
dissolved, and on reaching a certain degree of concentration they
solidify in their entire mass. These solidified masses are termed
_cryohydrates_. My researches on solutions of common salt (1868) showed
that its solution solidifies when it reaches a composition NaCl +
10H_{2}O (180 parts of water per 58·5 parts of salt), which takes place
at about -23°. The solidified solution melts at the same temperature,
and both the portion melted and the remainder preserve the above
composition. Guthrie (1874-1876) obtained the cryohydrates of many
salts, and he showed that certain of them are formed like the above at
comparatively low temperatures, whilst others (for instance, corrosive
sublimate, alums, potassium chlorate, and various colloids) are formed
on a slight cooling, to -2° or even before.[58] In the case of common
salt, the cryohydrate with 10 molecules of water, and in the case of
sodium nitrate, the cryohydrate[59] with 7 molecules of water (_i.e._
126 parts of water per 85 of salt) should be accepted as established
substances, capable of passing from a solid to a liquid state and
conversely; and therefore it may be thought that in cryohydrates we
have solutions which are not only undecomposable by cold, but also have
a definite composition which would present a fresh case of definite
equilibrium between the solvent and the substance dissolved.
[58] Offer (1880) concludes, from his researches on cryohydrates, that
they are simple mixtures of ice and salts, having a constant
melting point, just as there are alloys having a constant point
of fusion, and solutions of liquids with a constant boiling point
(_see_ note 60). This does not, however, explain in what form
a salt is contained, for instance, in the cryohydrate NaCl +
10H_{2}O. At temperatures above -10° common salt separates out in
anhydrous crystals, and at temperatures near -10°, in combination
with water of crystallisation, NaCl + 2H_{2}O, and, therefore,
it is very improbable that at still lower temperatures it would
separate without water. If the possibility of the solidified
cryohydrate containing NaCl + 2H_{2}O and ice be admitted, then
it is not clear why one of these substances does not melt before
the other. If alcohol does not extract water from the solid mass,
leaving the salt behind, this does not prove the presence of ice,
because alcohol also takes up water from the crystals of many
hydrated substances (for instance, from NaCl + 2H_{2}O) at about
their melting-points. Besides which, a simple observation on the
cryohydrate, NaCl + 10H_{2}O, shows that with the most careful
cooling it does not on the addition of ice deposit ice, which
would occur if ice were formed on solidification intermixed with
the salt.
I may add with regard to cryohydrates that many of the solutions
of acids solidify completely on prolonged cooling (for example,
H_{2}SO_{4},H_{2}O), and then form perfectly definite compounds.
For the solutions of sulphuric acid (_see_ Chapter XX.)
Pickering obtained, for instance, a hydrate, H_{2}SO_{4},4H_{2}O
at -25°. Hydrochloric, nitric, and other acids also give similar
crystalline hydrates, melting at low temperatures and presenting
many similarities with the cryohydrates.
[59] _See_ note 24.
The formation of definite but unstable compounds in the process of
solution becomes evident from the phenomena of a marked decrease of
vapour tension, or from the rise of the temperature of ebullition which
occurs in the solution of certain volatile liquids and gases in water.
As an example, we will take hydriodic acid, HI, a gas which liquefies,
giving a liquid which boils at -20°. A solution of it containing 57 p.c.
of hydriodic acid is distinguished by the fact that if it be heated
the hydriodic acid volatilises together with the water in the same
proportions as they occur in the solution, therefore such a solution
may be distilled unchanged. The solution boils at a higher temperature
than water, at 127°. A portion of the physical properties of the gas
and water have in this case already disappeared--a new substance is
formed, which has its definite boiling point. To put it more correctly,
this is not the temperature of ebullition, but the temperature at which
the compound formed decomposes, forming the vapours of the products of
dissociation, which, on cooling, re-combine. Should a less amount of
hydriodic acid be dissolved in water than the above, then, on heating
such a solution, water only at first distils over, until the solution
attains the above-mentioned composition; it will then distil over
unaltered. If more hydriodic acid be passed into such a solution a fresh
quantity of the gas will dissolve, but it passes off with great ease,
like air from water. It must not, however, be thought that those forces
which determine the formation of ordinary gaseous solutions play no part
whatever in the formation of a solution having a definite boiling point;
that they do react is shown from the fact that such constant gaseous
solutions vary in their composition under different pressures.[60] It
is not, therefore, at every, but only at the ordinary, atmospheric
pressure that a constant boiling solution of hydriodic acid will contain
57 p.c. of the gas. At another pressure the proportion of water and
hydriodic acid will be different. It varies, however, judging from
observations made by Roscoe, very little for considerable variations of
pressure. This variation in composition directly indicates that pressure
exerts an influence on the formation of unstable chemical compounds
which are easily dissociated (with formation of a gas), just as it
influences the solution of gases, only the latter is influenced to a
more considerable degree than the former.[61] Hydrochloric, nitric, and
other acids form _solutions having definite boiling points_, like that
of hydriodic acid. They show further the common property, if containing
but a small proportion of water, that they _fume in air_. Strong
solutions of nitric, hydrochloric, hydriodic, and other gases are even
termed 'fuming acids.' The fuming liquids contain a definite compound
whose temperature of ebullition (decomposition) is higher than 100°,
and contain also an excess of the volatile substance dissolved, which
exhibits a capacity to combine with water and form a hydrate, whose
vapour tension is less than that of aqueous vapour. On evaporating in
air, this dissolved substance meets the atmospheric moisture and forms
a visible vapour (fumes) with it, which consists of the above-mentioned
compound. The attraction or affinity which binds, for instance,
hydriodic acid with water is evinced not only in the evolution of heat
and the diminution of vapour tension (rise of boiling point), but also
in many purely chemical relations. Thus hydriodic acid is produced from
iodine and hydrogen sulphide in the presence of water, but unless water
is present this reaction does not take place.[62]
[60] For this reason (the want of entire constancy of the composition
of constant boiling solutions with a change of pressure), the
existence of definite hydrates formed by volatile substances--for
instance, by hydrochloric acid and water--is frequently denied.
It is generally argued as follows: If there did exist a constancy
of composition, then it would be unaltered by a change of
pressure. But the distillation of constant boiling hydrates
is undoubtedly accompanied (judging by the vapour densities
determined by Bineau), like the distillation of sal ammoniac,
sulphuric acid, &c., by a complete decomposition of the original
compound--that is, these substances do not exist in a state
of vapour, but their products of decomposition (hydrochloric
acid and water) are gases at the temperature of volatilisation,
which dissolve in the volatilised and condensed liquids; but
the solubility of gases in liquids depends on the pressure,
and, therefore, the composition of constant boiling solutions
may, and even ought to, vary with a change of pressure, and,
further, the smaller the pressure and the lower the temperature
of volatilisation, the more likely is a true compound to be
obtained. According to the researches of Roscoe and Dittmar
(1859), the constant boiling solution of hydrochloric acid
proved to contain 18 p.c. of hydrochloric acid at a pressure of
3 atmospheres, 20 p.c. at 1 atmosphere, and 23 p.c. at 1/10 of
an atmosphere. On passing air through the solution until its
composition became constant (_i.e._ forcing the excess of aqueous
vapour or of hydrochloric acid to pass away with the air),
then acid was obtained containing about 20 p.c. at 100°, about
23 p.c. at 50°, and about 25 p.c. at 0°. From this it is seen
that by decreasing the pressure and lowering the temperature of
evaporation one arrives at the same limit, where the composition
should be taken as HCl + 6H_{2}O, which requires 25·26 p.c. of
hydrochloric acid. Fuming hydrochloric acid contains more than
this.
In the case already considered, as in the case of formic acid
in the researches of D. P. Konovaloff (note 47), the constant
boiling solution corresponds with a minimum tension--that
is, with a boiling point higher than that of either of the
component elements. But there is another case of constant boiling
solutions similar to the case of the solution of propyl alcohol,
C_{3}H_{8}O, when a solution, undecomposed by distillation, boils
at a lower point than that of the more volatile liquid. However,
in this case also, if there be solution, the possibility of the
formation of a definite compound in the form C_{3}H_{8}O + H_{2}O
cannot be denied, and the tension of the solution is not equal to
the sum of tensions of the components. There are possible cases
of constant boiling mixtures even when there is no solution nor
any loss of tension, and consequently no chemical action, since
the amount of liquids that are volatilised is determined by
the product of the vapour densities into their vapour tensions
(Wanklyn), in consequence of which liquids whose boiling point
is above 100°--for instance, turpentine and ethereal oils in
general--when distilled with aqueous vapour, pass over at a
temperature below 100°. Consequently, it is not in the constancy
of composition and boiling point (temperature of decomposition)
that evidence of a distinct chemical action is to be found in
the above-described solutions of acids, but in the great loss
of tension, which completely resembles the loss of tension
observed, for instance, in the perfectly-definite combinations of
substances with water of crystallisation (see later, note 65).
Sulphuric acid, H_{2}SO_{4}, as we shall learn later, is also
decomposed by distillation, like HCl + 6H_{2}O, and exhibits,
moreover, all the signs of a definite chemical compound. The
study of the variation of the specific gravities of solutions as
dependent on their composition (see note 19) shows that phenomena
of a similar kind, although of different dimensions, take place
in the formation of both H_{2}SO_{4} from H_{2}O and SO_{3}, and
of HCl + 6H_{2}O (or of aqueous solutions analogous to it) from
HCl and H_{2}O.
[61] The essence of the matter may he thus represented. A gaseous or
easily volatile substance _A_ forms with a certain quantity of
water, _n_H_{2}O, a definite complex compound _An_H_{2}O, which
is stable up to a temperature t° higher than 100°. At this
temperature it is decomposed into two substances, _A_ + H_{2}O.
Both boil below _t_° at the ordinary pressure, and therefore at
_t_° they distil over and re-combine in the receiver. But if a
part of the substance _An_H_{2}O is decomposed or volatilised,
a portion of the undecomposed liquid still remains in the
vessel, which can partially dissolve one of the products of
decomposition, and that in quantity varying with the pressure and
temperature, and therefore the solution at a constant boiling
point will have a slightly different composition at different
pressures.
[62] For solutions of hydrochloric acid in water there are still greater
differences in reactions. For instance, strong solutions
decompose antimony sulphide (forming hydrogen sulphide, H_{2}S),
and precipitate common salt from its solutions, whilst weak
solutions do not act thus.
Many compunds containing water of crystallisation are solid substances
(when melted they are already solutions--_i.e._ liquids); furthermore,
they are capable of being formed from solutions, like ice or aqueous
vapour. They may be called _crystallo-hydrates_. Inasmuch as the direct
presence of ice or aqueous vapour cannot be admitted in solutions
(for these are liquids), although the presence of water may be, so
also there is no basis for acknowledging the presence in solutions
of crystallo-hydrates, although they are obtained from solutions as
such.[63] It is evident that such substances present one of the many
forms of equilibrium between water and a substance dissolved in it.
This form, however, reminds one, in all respects, of solutions--that
is, aqueous compounds which are more or less easily decomposed, with
separation of water and the formation of a less aqueous or an anhydrous
compound. In fact, there are not a few crystals containing water which
lose a part of their water at the ordinary temperature. Of such a kind,
for instance, are the crystals of soda, or sodium carbonate, which,
when separated from an aqueous solution at the ordinary temperature,
are quite transparent; but when left exposed to air, lose a portion
of their water, becoming opaque, and, in the process, lose their
crystalline appearance, although preserving their original form.
This process of the separation of water at the ordinary temperature
is termed the _efflorescence_ of crystals. Efflorescence takes place
more rapidly under the receiver of an air pump, and especially at a
gentle heat. This breaking up of a crystal is dissociation at the
ordinary temperature. Solutions are decomposed in exactly the same
manner.[64] The tension of the aqueous vapour which is given off
from crystallo-hydrates is naturally, as with solutions, less than
the vapour tension of water itself[65] at the same temperature, and
therefore many anhydrous salts which are capable of combining with
water absorb aqueous vapour from moist air; that is, they act like a
cold body on which water is deposited from steam. It is on this that
the desiccation of gases is based, and it must further be remarked in
this respect that certain substances--for instance, potassium carbonate
(K_{2}CO_{3}) and calcium chloride (CaCl_{2})--not only absorb the water
necessary for the formation of a solid crystalline compound, but also
give solutions, or _deliquesce_, as it is termed, in moist air. Many
crystals do not effloresce in the least at the ordinary temperature;
for example, copper sulphate, which may be preserved for an indefinite
length of time without efflorescing, but when placed under the receiver
of an air pump, if efflorescence be once started, it goes on at the
ordinary temperature. The temperature at which the complete separation
of water from crystals takes place varies considerably, not only for
different substances, but also for different portions of the contained
water. Very often the temperature at which dissociation begins is very
much higher than the boiling point of water. So, for example, copper
sulphate, which contains 36 p.c. of water, gives up 28·8 p.c. at 100°,
and the remaining quantity, namely 7·2 p.c., only at 240°. Alum, out of
the 45·5 p.c. of water which it contains, gives up 18·9 p.c. at 100°,
17·7 p.c. at 120°, 7·7 p.c. at 180°, and 1 p.c. at 280°; it only loses
the last quantity (1 p.c.) at its temperature of decomposition. These
examples clearly show that the annexation of water of crystallisation
is accompanied by a rather profound, although, in comparison with
instances which we shall consider later, still inconsiderable, change
of its properties. In certain cases the water of crystallisation is
only given off when the solid form of the substance is destroyed: when
the crystals melt on heating. The crystals are then said _to melt in
their water of crystallisation_. Further, after the separation of the
water, a solid substance remains behind, so that by further heating it
acquires a solid form. This is seen most clearly in crystals of sugar of
lead or lead acetate, which melt in their water of crystallisation at a
temperature of 56·25°, and in so doing begin to lose water. On reaching
a temperature of 100° the sugar of lead solidifies, having lost all its
water; and then at a temperature of 280°, the anhydrous and solidified
salt again melts.[65 bis]
[63] Supersaturated solutions give an excellent proof in this respect.
Thus a solution of copper sulphate generally crystallises in
penta-hydrated crystals, CuSO_{4} + 5H_{2}O, and its saturated
solution gives such crystals if it be brought into contact with
the minutest possible crystal of the same kind. But, according
to the observations of Lecoq de Boisbaudran, if a crystal of
ferrous sulphate (an isomorphous salt, _see_ note 55), FeSO_{4}
+ 7H_{2}O, be placed in a saturated solution of copper sulphate,
then crystals of hepta-hydrated salt, CuSO_{4} + 7H_{2}O,
are obtained. It is evident that neither the penta-nor the
hepta-hydrated salt is contained as such in the solution. The
solution presents its own particular liquid form of equilibrium.
[64] Efflorescence, like every evaporation, proceeds from the surface.
In the interior of crystals which have effloresced there is
usually found a non-effloresced mass, so that the majority of
effloresced crystals of washing soda show, in their fracture, a
transparent nucleus coated by an effloresced, opaque, powdery
mass. It is a remarkable circumstance in this respect that
efflorescence proceeds in a completely regular and uniform
manner, so that the angles and planes of similar crystallographic
character effloresce simultaneously, and in this respect the
crystalline form determines those parts of crystals where
efflorescence starts, and the order in which it continues. In
solutions evaporation also proceeds from the surface, and the
first crystals which appear on its reaching the required degree
of saturation are also formed at the surface. After falling to
the bottom the crystals naturally continue to grow (_see_ Chapter
X.).
[65] According to Lesc[oe]ur (1883), at 100° a concentrated solution of
barium hydroxide, BaH_{2}O_{2}, on first depositing crystals
(with + H_{2}O) has a tension of about 630 mm. (instead of
760 mm., the tension of water), which decreases (because the
solution evaporates) to 45 mm., when all the water is expelled
from the crystals, BaH_{2}O_{2} + H_{2}O, which are formed, but
they also lose water (dissociate, effloresce at 100°), leaving
the hydroxide, BaH_{2}O_{2}, which is perfectly undecomposable
at 100°--that is, does not part with water. At 73° (the tension
of water is then 265 mm.) a solution, containing 33H_{2}O,
on crystallising has a tension of 230 mm.; the crystals,
BaH_{2}O_{2} + 8H_{2}O, which separate out, have a tension of
160 mm.; on losing water they give BaH_{2}O_{2} + H_{2}O. This
substance does not decompose at 73°, and therefore its tension =
0. In those crystallohydrates which effloresce at the ordinary
temperature, the tension of dissociation nearly approximates
to that of the aqueous vapour, as Lesc[oe]ur (1891) showed. To
this category of compounds belong B_{2}O_{3}(3 + _x_)H_{2}O,
C_{2}O_{4}H_{2}(2 + _x_)H_{2}O, BaO(9 + _x_)H_{2}O, and SrO(9
+ _x_)H_{2}O. And a still greater tension is possessed by
Na_{2}SO_{4}10H_{2}O, Na_{2}CO_{3}10H_{2}O, and MgSO_{4}(7 +
_x_)H_{2}O. Müller-Erzbach (1884) determines the tension (with
reference to liquid water) by placing tubes of the same length
with water and the substances experimented with in a desiccator,
the rate of loss of water giving the relative tension. Thus,
at the ordinary temperature, crystals of sodium phosphate,
Na_{2}HPO_{4} + 12H_{2}O, present a tension of 0·7 compared
with water, until they lose 5H_{2}O, then 0·4 until they lose
5H_{2}O more, and on losing the last equivalent of water the
tension falls to 0·04 compared with water. It is clear that
the different molecules of water are held by an unequal force.
Out of the five molecules of water in copper sulphate the two
first are comparatively easily separated even at the ordinary
temperature (but only after several days in a desiccator,
according to Latchinoff); the next two are more difficultly
separated, and the last equivalent is retained even at 100°. This
is another indication of the capacity of CuSO_{4} to form three
hydrates, CuSO_{4}5H_{2}O, CuSO_{4}3H_{2}O, and CuSO_{4}H_{2}O.
The researches of Andreae on the tension of dissociation of
hydrated sulphate of copper showed (1891) the existence of three
provinces, characterised at a given temperature by a constant
tension: (1) between 3-5, (2) between 1-3, and lastly (3) between
0-1 molecule of water, which again confirms the existence of
three hydrates of the above composition for this salt.
[65 bis] Sodium acetate (C_{2}H_{3}O_{2}Na,3H_{2}O) melts at 58°, but
re-solidifies only on contact with a crystal, otherwise it
may remain liquid even at 0°, and may be used for obtaining a
constant temperature. According to Jeannel, the latent heat
of fusion is about 28 calories, and according to Pickering
the heat of solution 35 calories. When melted this salt boils
at 123°--that is, the tension of the vapour given off at that
temperature equals the atmospheric pressure.
It is most important to recognise in respect to the water of
crystallisation that its ratio to the quantity of the substance with
which it is combined is always a constant quantity. However often we
may prepare copper sulphate, we shall always find 36·14 p.c. of water
in its crystals, and these crystals always lose four-fifths of their
water at 100°, and one-fifth of the whole amount of the water contained
remains in the crystals at 100°, and is only expelled from them at a
temperature of about 240°. What has been said about crystals of copper
sulphate refers also to crystals of every other substance, which contain
water of crystallisation. It is impossible in any of these cases to
increase either the relative proportion of the salt or of the water,
without changing the homogeneity of the substance. If once a portion of
the water be lost--for instance, if once efflorescence takes place--a
mixture is obtained, and not a homogeneous substance, namely a mixture
of a substance deprived of water with a substance which has not yet lost
water--_i.e._ decomposition has already commenced. This constant ratio
is an example of the fact that in chemical compounds the quantity of
the component parts is quite definite; that is, it is an example of the
so-called _definite chemical compounds_. They may be distinguished from
solutions, and from all other so-called indefinite chemical compounds,
in that at least one, and sometimes both, of the component parts may be
added in a large quantity to an indefinite chemical compound, without
destroying its homogeneity, as in solutions, whilst it is impossible
to add any one of the component parts to a definite chemical compound
without destroying the homogeneity of the entire mass. Definite
chemical compounds only decompose at a certain rise in temperature;
on a lowering in temperature they do not, at least with very few
exceptions, yield their components like solutions which form ice or
compounds with water of crystallisation. This leads to the assumption
that solutions contain water as water,[66] although it may sometimes
be in a very small quantity. Therefore solutions which are capable
of solidifying completely (for instance, crystallo-hydrates capable
of melting) such as the compound of 84-1/2 parts of sulphuric acid,
H_{2}SO_{4}, with 15-1/2 parts of water, H_{2}O, or H_{2}SO_{4},H_{2}O
(or H_{4}SO_{5}), appear as true definite chemical compounds. If,
then, we imagine such a definite compound in a liquid state, and admit
that it partially decomposes in this state, separating water--not as
ice or vapour (for then the system would be heterogeneous, including
substances in different physical states), but in a liquid form, when
the system will be homogeneous--we shall form an idea of a solution as
an unstable, dissociating fluid state of equilibrium between water and
the substance dissolved. Moreover, it should be remarked that, judging
by experiment, many substances give with water not one but _diverse_
compounds,[67] which is seen in the capacity of one substance to form
with water many various _crystallo-hydrates_, or compounds with water
of crystallisation, showing diverse and independent properties. From
these considerations, _solutions[68] may be regarded as fluid, unstable,
definite chemical compounds in a state of dissociation_.[69]
[66] Such a phenomenon frequently presents itself in purely chemical
action. For instance, let a liquid substance _A_ give, with
another liquid substance _B_, under the conditions of an
experiment, a mere minute quantity of a solid or gaseous
substance _C_. This small quantity will separate out (pass
away from the sphere of action, as Berthollet expressed it),
and the remaining masses of _A_ and _B_ will again give _C_;
consequently, under these conditions action will go on to the
end. Such, it seems to me, is the action in solutions when they
yield ice or vapour indicating the presence of water.
[67] Certain substances are capable of forming together only one
compound, others several, and these of the most varied degrees
of stability. The compounds of water are instances of this
kind. In solutions the existence of several different definite
compounds must be acknowledged, but many of these have not
yet been obtained in a free state, and it may be that they
cannot be obtained in any other but a liquid form--that is,
dissolved; just as there are many undoubted definite compounds
which only exist in one physical state. Among the hydrates such
instances occur. The compound CO_{2} + 8H_{2}O (_see_ note
31), according to Wroblewski, only occurs in a solid form.
Hydrates like H_{2}S + 12H_{2}O (De Forcrand and Villard), HBr
+ H_{2}O (Roozeboom), can only be accepted on the basis of a
decrease of tension, but present themselves as very transient
substances, incapable of existing in a stable free state.
Even sulphuric acid, H_{2}SO_{4}, itself, which undoubtedly
is a definite compound, fumes in a liquid form, giving off
the anhydride, SO_{3}--that is, it exhibits a very unstable
equilibrium. The crystallo-hydrates of chlorine, Cl_{2} +
8H_{2}O, of hydrogen sulphide, H_{2}S + 12H_{2}O (it is formed
at 0°, and is completely decomposed at +1°, as then 1 vol. of
water only dissolves 4 vols. of hydrogen sulphide, while at 0·1°
it dissolves about 100 vols.), and of many other gases, are
instances of hydrates which are very unstable.
[68] Of such a kind are also other indefinite chemical compounds; for
example, metallic alloys. These are solid substances or
solidified solutions of metals. They also contain definite
compounds, and may contain an excess of one of the metals.
According to the experiments of Laurie (1888), the alloys of zinc
with copper in respect to the electro-motive force in galvanic
batteries behave just like zinc if the proportion of copper in
the alloy does not exceed a certain percentage--that is, until
a definite compound is attained--for in that case particles of
free zinc are present; but if a copper surface be taken, and it
be covered by only one-thousandth part of its area of zinc, then
only the zinc will act in a galvanic battery.
[69] According to the above supposition, the condition of solutions
in the sense of the kinetic hypothesis of matter (that is, on
the supposition of an internal motion of molecules and atoms)
may be represented in the following form:--In a homogeneous
liquid--for instance, water--the molecules occur in a certain
state of, although mobile, still stable, equilibrium. When a
substance _A_ dissolves in water, its molecules form with several
molecules of water, systems _An_H_{2}O, which are so unstable
that when surrounded by molecules of water they decompose and
re-form, so that _A_ passes from one mass of molecules of water
to another, and the molecules of water which were at this
moment in harmonious motion with _A_ in the form of the system
_An_H_{2}O, in the next instant may have already succeeded in
getting free. The addition of water or of molecules of _A_
may either only alter the number of free molecules, which in
their turn enter into systems _An_H_{2}O, or they may introduce
conditions for the possibility of building up new systems
_Am_H_{2}O, where _m_ is either greater or less than _n_. If
in the solution the relation of the molecules be the same as
in the system _Am_H_{2}O, then the addition of fresh molecules
of water or of _A_ would be followed by the formation of new
molecules _An_H_{2}O. The relative quantity, stability, and
composition of these systems or definite compounds will vary in
one or another solution. I adopted this view of solutions (1887,
Pickering subsequently put forward a similar view) after a most
intimate study of the variation of their specific gravities, to
which my book, cited in note 19, is devoted. Definite compounds,
_An__{1}H_{2}O and _Am__{1}H_{2}O, existing in a free--for
instance, solid--form, may in certain cases be held in solutions
in a dissociated state (although but partially); they are similar
in their structure to those definite substances which are formed
in solutions, but it is not necessary to assume that such
systems as Na_{2}SO_{4} + 10H_{2}O, or Na_{2}SO_{4} + 7H_{2}O,
or Na_{2}SO_{4}, are contained in solutions. The comparatively
more stable systems _An__{1}H_{2}O which exist in a free state
and change their physical state must present, although within
certain limits of temperature, an entirely harmonious kind of
motion of _A_ with _n__{1}H_{2}O; the property also and state of
systems _An_H_{2}O and _Am_H_{2}O, occurring in solutions, is
that they are in a liquid form, although partially dissociated.
Substances _A__{1}, which give solutions, are distinguished by
the fact that they can form such unstable systems _An_H_{2}O,
but besides them they can give other much more stable systems
_An__{1}H_{2}O. Thus ethylene, C_{2}H_{4}, in dissolving in
water, probably forms a system C_{2}H_{4}_n_H_{2}O, which easily
splits up into C_{2}H_{4} and H_{2}O, but it also gives the
system of alcohol, C_{2}H_{4},H_{2}O or C_{2}H_{6}O, which is
comparatively stable. Thus oxygen can dissolve in water, and it
can combine with it, forming peroxide of hydrogen. Turpentine,
C_{10}H_{16}, does not dissolve in water, but it combines with it
as a comparatively stable hydrate. In other words, the chemical
structure of hydrates, or of the definite compounds which are
contained in solutions, is distinguished not only by its original
peculiarities but also by a diversity of stability. A similar
structure to hydrates must be acknowledged in crystallo-hydrates.
On melting they give actual (real) solutions. As substances which
give crystallo-hydrates, like salts, are capable of forming a
number of diverse hydrates, and as the greater the number of
molecules of water (_n_) they (_An_H_{2}O) contain, the lower
is the temperature of their formation, and as the more easily
they decompose the more water they hold, therefore, in the first
place, the isolation of hydrates holding much water existing in
aqueous solutions may be soonest looked for at low temperatures
(although, perhaps, in certain cases they cannot exist in the
solid state); and, secondly, the stability also of such higher
hydrates will be at a minimum under the ordinary circumstances
of the occurrence of liquid water. Hence a further more detailed
investigation of cryohydrates may help to the elucidation of
the nature of solutions. But it may be foreseen that certain
cryohydrates will, like metallic alloys, present solidified
mixtures of ice with the salts themselves and their more stable
hydrates, and others will be definite compounds.
In regarding solutions from this point of view they come under the head
of those definite compounds with which chemistry is mainly concerned.[70]
[70] The above representation of solutions, &c., considering them as
a particular state of definite compounds, excludes the
independent existence of indefinite compounds; by this means that
unity of chemical conception is obtained which cannot be arrived
at by admitting the physico-mechanical conception of indefinite
compounds. The gradual transition from typical solutions (as
of gases in water, and of weak saline solutions) to sulphuric
acid, and from it and its definite, but yet unstable and liquid,
compounds, to clearly defined compounds, such as salts and their
crystallo-hydrates, is so imperceptible, that in denying that
solutions pertain to the number of definite but dissociating
compounds, we risk denying the definiteness of the atomic
composition of such substances as sulphuric acid or of molten
crystallo-hydrates. I repeat, however, that for the present the
theory of solutions cannot be considered as firmly established.
The above opinion about them is nothing more than a hypothesis
which endeavours to satisfy those comparatively limited data
which we have for the present about solutions, and of those
cases of their transition into definite compounds. By submitting
solutions to the Daltonic conception of atomism, I hope that we
may not only attain to a general harmonious chemical doctrine,
but also that new motives for investigation and research will
appear in the problem of solutions, which must either confirm the
proposed theory or replace it by another fuller and truer one;
and I for my part cannot consider this to be the case with any of
the other present doctrines of solutions (note 49).
We saw above that copper sulphate loses four-fifths of its water at
100° and the remainder at 240°. This means that there are two definite
compounds of water with the anhydrous salt. Washing soda or carbonate of
sodium, Na_{2}CO_{3} separates out as crystals, Na_{2}CO_{3},10H_{2}O,
containing 62·9 p.c. of water by weight, from its solutions at the
ordinary temperature. When a solution of the same salt deposits crystals
at a low temperature, about -20°, then these crystals contain 71·8
parts of water per 28·2 parts of anhydrous salt. Further, the crystals
are obtained together with ice, and are left behind when it melts. If
ordinary soda, with 62·9 p.c. of water, be cautiously melted in its
own water of crystallisation, there remains a salt, in a solid state,
containing only 14·5 p.c. of water, and a liquid is obtained which
contains the solution of a salt which separates out crystals at 34°,
which contain 46 p.c. of water and do not effloresce in air. Lastly,
if a supersaturated solution of soda be prepared, then at temperatures
below 8° it deposits crystals containing 54·3 p.c. of water. Thus as
many as five compounds of anhydrous soda with water are known; and
they are dissimilar in their properties and crystalline form, and even
in their solubility. It is to be observed that the greatest amount of
water in the crystals corresponds with a temperature of -20°, and the
smallest to the highest temperature. There is apparently no relation
between the above quantities of water and the salts, but this is only
because in each case the amount of water and anhydrous salt was given
in percentages; but if it be calculated for one and the same quantity
of anhydrous salt, or of water, a great regularity will be observed in
the amounts of the component parts in all these compounds. It appears
that for 106 parts of anhydrous salt in the crystals separated out at
-20° there are 270 parts of water; in the crystals obtained at 15° there
are 180 parts of water; in the crystals obtained from a supersaturated
solution 126 parts, in the crystals which separate out at 34°, 90
parts, and the crystals with the smallest amount of water, 18 parts.
On comparing these quantities of water it may easily be seen that they
are in simple proportion to each other, for they are all divisible by
18, and are in the ratio 15 : 10 : 7 : 5 : 1. Naturally, direct
experiment, however carefully it be conducted, is hampered with errors,
but taking these unavoidable experimental errors into consideration,
it will be seen that for a given quantity of an anhydrous substance
there occur, in several of its compounds with water, quantities of
water which are in very simple multiple proportion. This is observed
in, and is common to, all definite chemical compounds. This rule is
called _the law of multiple proportions_. It was discovered by Dalton,
and will be evolved in further detail subsequently in this work. For
the present we will only state that the law of definite composition
enables the composition of substances to be expressed by formulæ,
and the law of multiple proportions permits the application of whole
numbers as coefficients of the symbols of the elements in these formulæ.
Thus the formula Na_{2}CO_{3},10H_{2}O shows directly that in this
crystallo-hydrate there are 180 parts of water to 106 parts by weight of
the anhydrous salt, because the formula of soda, Na_{2}CO_{3}, directly
answers to a weight of 106, and the formula of water to 18 parts, by
weight, which are here taken 10 times.
In the above examples of the combinations of water, we saw the gradually
increasing intensity of the bond between water and a substance with
which it forms a homogeneous compound. There is a series of such
compounds with water, in which the water is held with very great force,
and is only given up at a very high temperature, and sometimes cannot
be separated by any degree of heat without the entire decomposition
of the substance. In these compounds there is generally no outward
sign whatever of their containing water. A perfectly new substance is
formed from an anhydrous substance and water, in which sometimes the
properties of neither one nor the other substance are observable. In
the majority of cases, a considerable amount of heat is evolved in the
formation of such compounds with water. Sometimes the heat evolved is
so intense that a red heat is produced and light is emitted. It is
hardly to be wondered at, after this, that stable compounds are formed
by such a combination. Their decomposition requires great heat; a large
amount of work is necessary to separate them into their component
parts. All such compounds are definite, and, generally, completely and
clearly definite. The number of such definite compounds with water or
_hydrates_, in the narrow sense of the word, is generally inconsiderable
for each anhydrous substance; in the greater number of cases, there is
formed only one such combination of a substance with water, one hydrate,
having so great a stability. The water contained in these compounds is
often called _water of constitution_--_i.e._ water which enters into the
structure or composition of the given substance. By this it is desired
to express, that in other cases the molecules of water are, as it were,
separate from the molecules of that substance with which it is combined.
It is supposed that in the formation of hydrates this water, even in
the smallest particles, forms one complete whole with the anhydrous
substance. Many examples of the formation of such hydrates might be
cited. The most familiar example in practice is the hydrate of lime,
or so-called 'slaked' lime. Lime is prepared by burning limestone, by
which the carbonic anhydride is expelled from it, and there remains
a white stony mass, which is dense, compact, and rather tenacious.
Lime is usually sold in this form, and bears the name of 'quick' or
'unslaked' lime. If water be poured over such lime, a great rise in
temperature is remarked either directly, or after a certain time. The
whole mass becomes hot, part of the water is evaporated, the stony mass
in absorbing water crumbles into powder, and if the water be taken in
sufficient quantity and the lime be pure and well burnt, not a particle
of the original stony mass is left--it all crumbles into powder. If
the water be in excess, then naturally a portion of it remains and
forms a solution. This process is called 'slaking' lime. Slaked lime is
used in practice in intermixture with sand as mortar. Slaked lime is a
definite hydrate of lime. If it is dried at 100° it retains 24·3 p.c.
of water. This water can only be expelled at a temperature above 400°,
and then quicklime is re-obtained. The heat evolved in the combination
of lime with water is so intense that it can set fire to wood, sulphur,
gunpowder, &c. Even on mixing lime with ice the temperature rises to
100°. If lime be moistened with a small quantity of water in the dark,
a luminous effect is observed. But, nevertheless, water may still be
separated from this hydrate.[71] If phosphorus be burnt in dry air, a
white substance called 'phosphoric anhydride' is obtained. It combines
with water with such energy, that the experiment must be conducted with
great caution. A red heat is produced in the formation of the compound,
and it is impossible to separate the water from the resultant hydrate
at any temperature. The hydrate formed by phosphoric anhydride is a
substance which is totally undecomposable into its original component
parts by the action of heat. Almost as energetic a combination occurs
when sulphuric anhydride, SO_{3}, combines with water, forming its
hydrate, sulphuric acid, H_{2}SO_{4}. In both cases definite compounds
are produced, but the latter substance, as a liquid, and capable of
decomposition by heat, forms an evident link with solutions. If 80 parts
of sulphuric anhydride retain 18 parts of water, this water cannot be
separated from the anhydride, even at a temperature of 300°. It is only
by the addition of phosphoric anhydride, or by a series of chemical
transformations, that this water can be separated from its compound
with sulphuric anhydride. Oil of vitriol, or sulphuric acid, is such a
compound. If a larger proportion of water be taken, it will combine
with the H_{2}SO_{4}; for instance, if 36 parts of water per 80 parts of
sulphuric anhydride be taken, a compound is formed which crystallises in
the cold, and melts at +8°, whilst oil of vitriol does not solidify even
at -30°. If still more water be taken, the oil of vitriol will dissolve
in the remaining quantity of water. An evolution of heat takes place,
not only on the addition of the water of constitution, but in a less
degree on further additions of water.[72] And therefore there is no
distinct boundary, but only a gradual transition, between those chemical
phenomena which are expressed in the formation of solutions and those
which take place in the formation of the most stable hydrates.[73]
[71] In combining with water one part by weight of lime evolves 245
units of heat. A high temperature is obtained, because the
specific heat of the resulting product is small. Sodium oxide,
Na_{2}O, in reacting on water, H_{2}O, and forming caustic soda
(sodium hydroxide), NaHO, evolves 552 units of heat for each part
by weight of sodium oxide.
[72] The diagram given in note 28 shows the evolution of heat on the
mixture of sulphuric acid, or monohydrate (H_{2}SO_{4}, _i.e._
SO_{3} + H_{2}O), with different quantities of water per 100
vols. of the resultant solution. Every 98 grams of sulphuric
acid (H_{2}SO_{4}) evolve, on the addition of 18 grams of water,
6,379 units of heat; with twice or three times the quantity of
water 9,418 and 11,137 units of heat, and with an infinitely
large quantity of water 17,860 units of heat, according to the
determinations of Thomsen. He also showed that when H_{2}SO_{4}
is formed from SO_{3} (= 80) and H_{2}O (= 18), 21,308 units
of heat are evolved per 98 parts by weight of the resultant
sulphuric acid.
[73] Thus, for different hydrates the stability with which they hold
water is very dissimilar. Certain hydrates hold water very
loosely, and in combining with it evolve little heat. From
other hydrates the water cannot be separated by any degree of
heat, even if they are formed from anhydrides (_i.e._ anhydrous
substances) and water with little evolution of heat; for
instance, acetic anhydride in combining with water evolves an
inconsiderable amount of heat, but the water cannot then be
expelled from it. If the hydrate (acetic acid) formed by this
combination be strongly heated it either volatilises without
change, or decomposes into new substances, but it does not again
yield the original substances--_i.e._, the anhydride and water,
at least in a liquid form. Here is an instance which gives the
reason for calling the water entering into the composition of the
hydrate, water of constitution. Such, for example, is the water
entering into the so-called caustic soda or sodium hydroxide
(_see_ note 71). But there are hydrates which easily part with
their water; yet this water cannot be considered as water of
crystallisation, not only because sometimes such hydrates have no
crystalline form, but also because, in perfectly analogous cases,
very stable hydrates are formed, which are capable of particular
kinds of chemical reactions, as we shall subsequently learn.
Such, for example, is the unstable hydrated oxide of copper,
which is not formed from water and oxide of copper, but which is
obtained just like far more stable hydrates, for example, the
hydrated oxide of barium BaH_{2}O_{2} equal to BaO + H_{2}O, by
the double decomposition of the solution of salts with alkalies.
In a word, there is no distinct boundary either between the water
of hydrates and of crystallisation, or between solution and
hydration.
It must be observed that in separating from an aqueous solution,
many substances, without having a crystalline form, hold water in
the same unstable state as in crystals; only this water cannot
be termed 'water of crystallisation' if the substance which
separates out has no crystalline form. The hydrates of alumina
and silica are examples of such unstable hydrates. If these
substances are separated from an aqueous solution by a chemical
process, then they always contain water. The formation of a new
chemical compound containing water is here particularly evident,
for alumina and silica in an anhydrous state have chemical
properties differing from those they show when combined with
water, and do not combine directly with it. The entire series of
colloids on separating from water form similar compounds with
it, which have the aspect of solid gelatinous substances. Water
is held in a considerable quantity in solidified glue or boiled
albumin. It cannot be expelled from them by pressure; hence,
in this case there has ensued some kind of combination of the
substance with water. This water, however, is easily separated on
drying; but not the whole of it, a portion being retained, and
this portion is considered to belong to the hydrate, although
in this case it is very difficult, if not impossible, to obtain
definite compounds. The absence of any distinct boundary lines
between solutions, crystallo-hydrates, and ordinary hydrates
above referred to, is very clearly seen in such examples.
We have thus considered many aspects and degrees of combination of
various substances with water, or instances of the compounds of water,
when it and other substances form new homogeneous substances, which
in this case will evidently be complex--_i.e._ made up of different
substances--and although they are homogeneous, yet it must be admitted
that in them there exist those component parts which entered into their
composition, inasmuch as these parts may be re-obtained from them. It
must not be imagined that water really exists in hydrate of lime, any
more than that ice or steam exists in water. When we say that water
occurs in the composition of a certain hydrate, we only wish to point
out that there are chemical transformations in which it is possible to
obtain that hydrate by means of water, and other transformations in
which this water may be separated out from the hydrate. This is all
simply expressed by the words, that water enters into the composition of
this hydrate. If a hydrate be formed by feeble bonds, and be decomposed
even at the ordinary temperature, and be a liquid, then the water
appears as one of the products of dissociation, and this gives an idea
of what solutions are, and forms the fundamental distinction between
them and other hydrates in which the water is combined with greater
stability.