But I recouped myself, as they say in England, by stopping afterwards at
Chichester. In this dense and various old England two places may be very
near together and yet strike a very different note. I knew in a general
way that there was a cathedral at Chichester; indeed, I had seen its
beautiful spire from the window of the train. I had always regarded an
afternoon in a little cathedral-town as a high order of entertainment,
and a morning at Portsmouth had left me in the mood for not missing such
an exhibition. The spire of Chichester at a little distance greatly
resembles that of Salisbury. It is on a smaller scale, but it tapers
upward with a delicate slimness which, like that of its famous rival,
makes a picture of the level landscape in which it stands. Unlike the
spire of Salisbury, however, it has not at present the charm of
antiquity. A few years ago the old steeple collapsed and tumbled into
the church, and the present structure is but a modern facsimile. The
cathedral is not of the highest interest; it is rather plain and bare,
and, except a curious old detached bell-tower which stands beside it,
has no particular element of unexpectedness. But an English cathedral of
restricted grandeur may yet be a very charming affair; and I spent an
hour or so lounging around this highly respectable edifice, without the
spell of contemplation being broken by satiety. I approached it, from
the station, by the usual quiet red-brick street of the usual cathedral
town--a street of small, excellent shops, before which, here and there,
one of the vehicles of the neighbouring gentry was drawn up beside the
curbstone, while the grocer or the bookseller, who had hurried out
obsequiously, was waiting upon the comfortable occupant. I went into a
bookseller's to buy a Chichester guide, which I perceived in the window;
I found the shopkeeper talking to a young curate in a soft hat. The
guide seemed very desirable, though it appeared to have been but
scantily desired; it had been published in the year 1841, and a very
large remnant of the edition, with a muslin back and a little white
label and paper-covered boards, was piled up on the counter. It was
dedicated, with terrible humility, to the Duke of Richmond, and
ornamented with primitive woodcuts and steel plates; the ink had turned
brown and the page musty; and the style itself--that of a provincial
antiquary of upwards of forty years ago penetrated with the grandeur of
the aristocracy--had grown rather sallow and stale. Nothing could have
been more mellifluous and urbane than the young curate: he was arranging
to have the _Times_ newspaper sent him every morning for perusal. "So it
will be a penny if it is fetched away at noon?" he said, smiling very
sweetly and with the most gentlemanly voice possible; "and it will be
three halfpence if it is fetched away at four o'clock?" At the top of
the street, into which, with my guide-book, I relapsed, was an old
market-cross, of the fifteenth century--a florid, romantic little
structure. It consists of a stone pavilion, with open sides and a number
of pinnacles and crockets and buttresses, besides a goodly medallion of
the high-nosed visage of Charles I., which was placed above one of the
arches, at the Restoration, in compensation for the violent havoc
wrought upon the little town by the Parliamentary soldiers, who had
wrested the place from the Royalists, and who amused themselves, in
their grim fashion, with infinite hacking and hewing in the cathedral.
Here, to the left, the cathedral discloses itself, lifting its smart
gray steeple out of a pleasant garden. Opposite to the garden was the
Dolphin or the Dragon--in fine, the most eligible inn. I must confess
that for a time it divided my attention with the cathedral, in virtue of
an ancient, musty parlour on the second floor, with hunting-pictures
hung above haircloth sofas; of a red-faced waiter, in evening dress; of
a big round of cold beef and a tankard of ale. The prettiest thing at
Chichester is a charming little three-sided cloister, attached to the
cathedral, where, as is usual in such places, you may sit upon a
gravestone amid the deep grass in the middle, and measure the great
central mass of the church--the large gray sides, the high foundations
of the spire, the parting of the nave and transept. From this point the
greatness of a cathedral seems more complex and impressive. You watch
the big shadows slowly change their relations; you listen to the cawing
of rooks and the twittering of swallows; you hear a slow footstep
echoing in the cloisters.
V
If Oxford were not the finest thing in England, Cambridge would
certainly be. Cambridge was so, for that matter, to my imagination, for
thirty-six hours. To the barbaric mind, ambitious of culture, Oxford is
the usual image of the happy reconciliation between research and
acceptance. It typifies, to an American, the union of science and
sense--of aspiration and ease. A German university gives a greater
impression of science, and an English country-house or an Italian villa
a greater impression of idle enjoyment; but in these cases, on one side,
knowledge is too rugged, and, on the other, satisfaction is too trivial.
Oxford lends sweetness to labour and dignity to leisure. When I say
Oxford, I mean Cambridge, for a barbarian is not in the least obliged to
know the difference, and it suddenly strikes me as being both very
pedantic and very good-natured in him to pretend to know it. What
institution is more majestic than Trinity College? what can be more
touching to an American than the hospitality of such an institution? The
first quadrangle is of immense extent, and the buildings that surround
it, with their long, rich fronts of time-deepened gray, are the
stateliest in the world. In the centre of the court are two or three
acres of close-shaven lawn, in the midst of which rises a splendid
gothic fountain, where the serving-men fill up their buckets. There are
towers and battlements and statues, and besides these things there are
cloisters and gardens and bridges. There are charming rooms in a kind of
stately gate-tower, and the rooms, occupying the thickness of the
building, have windows looking out on one side over the magnificent
quadrangle, with half a mile or so of Decorated architecture, and on the
other into deep-bosomed trees. And in the rooms is the best company
conceivable--distinguished men who are remarkably good fellows. I spent
a beautiful Sunday morning walking about Cambridge, with one of these
gentlemen, and attempting, as the French say, to _débrouiller_ its
charms. These are a very complicated affair, and I do not pretend, in
memory, to keep the colleges apart. There are, however, half a dozen
points that make ineffaceable pictures. Six or eight of the colleges
stand in a row, turning their backs to the river; and hereupon ensues
the loveliest confusion of gothic windows and ancient trees, of grassy
banks and mossy balustrades, of sun-chequered avenues and groves, of
lawns and gardens and terraces, of single-arched bridges spanning the
little stream, which is small and shallow, and looks as if it had been
"turned on" for ornamental purposes. The scantily-flowing Cam appears to
exist simply as an occasion for these enchanting little bridges--the
beautiful covered gallery of John's or the slightly-collapsing arch of
Clare. In the way of college-courts and quiet scholastic porticoes, of
gray-walled gardens and ivied nooks of study, in all the pictorial
accidents of a great English university, Cambridge is delightfully and
inexhaustibly rich. I looked at these one by one, and said to myself
always that the last was the best. If I were called upon, however, to
mention the prettiest corner of the world, I should heave a tender sigh
and point the way to the garden of Trinity Hall. My companion, who was
very competent to judge (but who spoke, indeed, with the partiality of a
son of the house), declared, as he ushered me into it, that it was, to
his mind, the most beautiful _small_ garden in Europe. I freely
accepted, and I promptly repeat, an affirmation so ingeniously
conditioned. The little garden at Trinity Hall is narrow and crooked; it
leans upon the river, from which a low parapet, all muffled in ivy,
divides it; it has an ancient wall, adorned with a thousand matted
creepers on one side, and on the other a group of extraordinary
horse-chestnuts. These trees are of prodigious size; they occupy half
the garden, and they are remarkable for the fact that their giant limbs
strike down into the earth, take root again, and emulate, as they rise,
the majesty of the parent tree. The manner in which this magnificent
group of horse-chestnuts sprawls about over the grass, out into the
middle of the lawn, is one of the most picturesque features of the
garden of Trinity Hall. Of course the single object at Cambridge that
makes the most abiding impression is the famous chapel of King's
College--the most beautiful chapel in England. The effect it attempts to
produce within belongs to the order of sublimity. The attempt succeeds,
and the success is attained by means so light and elegant that at first
it almost defeats itself. The sublime usually has more of a frown and
straddle, and it is not until after you have looked about you for ten
minutes that you perceive that the chapel is saved from being the
prettiest church in England by the accident of its being one of the
noblest. It is a cathedral without aisles or columns or transepts, but
(as a compensation) with such a beautiful slimness of clustered tracery
soaring along the walls, and spreading, bending and commingling in the
roof, that its simplicity seems only a richness the more. I stood there
for a quarter of an hour on a Sunday morning; there was no service, but
in the choir behind the great screen which divides the chapel in half,
the young choristers were rehearsing for the afternoon. The beautiful
boy-voices rose together and touched the splendid vault; they hung
there, expanding and resounding, and then, like a rocket that spends
itself, they faded and melted toward the end of the building. The sound
was angelic.