CANTO IV.

1.

I stood in Venice, on the "Bridge of Sighs;"

A Palace and a prison on each hand.

Stanza i. lines 1 and 2.

The communication between the ducal palace and the prisons of Venice is

by a gloomy bridge, or covered gallery, high above the water, and

divided by a stone wall into a passage and a cell. The state dungeons

called _pozzi_, or wells, were sunk in the thick walls of the palace:

and the prisoner, when taken out to die, was conducted across the

gallery to the other side, and being then led back into the other

compartment, or cell, upon the bridge, was there strangled. The low

portal through which the criminal was taken into this cell is now walled

up; but the passage is still open, and is still known by the name of the

"Bridge of Sighs." The _pozzi_ are under the flooring of the chamber at

the foot of the bridge. They were formerly twelve; but on the first

arrival of the French, the Venetians hastily blocked or broke up the

deeper of these dungeons. You may still, however descend by a trap-door,

and crawl down through holes, half choked by rubbish, to the depth of

two stories below the first range. If you are in want of consolation for

the extinction of patrician power, perhaps you may find it there;

scarcely a ray of light glimmers into the narrow gallery which leads to

the cells, and the places of confinement themselves are totally dark. A

small hole in the wall admitted the damp air of the passages, and

served for the introduction of the prisoner's food. A wooden pallet,

raised a foot from the ground, was the only furniture. The conductors

tell you that a light was not allowed. The cells are about five paces in

length, two and a half in width, and seven feet in height. They are

directly beneath one another, and respiration is somewhat difficult in

the lower holes. Only one prisoner was found when the republicans

descended into these hideous recesses, and he is said to have been

confined sixteen years. But the inmates of the dungeons beneath had left

traces of their repentance, or of their despair, which are still

visible, and may, perhaps, owe something to recent ingenuity. Some of

the detained appear to have offended against, and others to have

belonged to, the sacred body, not only from their signatures, but from

the churches and belfries which they have scratched upon the walls. The

reader may not object to see a specimen of the records prompted by so

terrific a solitude. As nearly as they could be copied by more than one

pencil, three of them are as follows:--

1. NON TI FIDAR AD ALCUNO PENSA e TACI

SE FUGIR VUOI DE SPIONI INSIDIE e LACCI

IL PENTIRTI PENTIRTI NULLA GIOVA

MA BEN DI VALOR TUO LA VERA PROVA

1607. ADI 2. GENARO. FUI RETENTO

P' LA BESTIEMMA P' AVER DATO

DA MANZAR A UN MORTO

IACOMO. GRITTI. SCRISSE.

2. UN PARLAR POCHO et

NEGARE PRONTO et

UN PENSAR AL FINE PUO DARE LA VITA

A NOI ALTRI MESCHINI

1605.

EGO IOHN BAPTISTA AD

ECCLESIAM CORTELLARIUS.

3. DE CHI MI FIDO GUARDAMI DIO

DE CHI NON MI FIDO MI GUARDARO IO

A TA H A NA

V. LA S. C. K. R.

The copyist has followed, not corrected, the solecisms; some of which

are, however, not quite so decided since the letters were evidently

scratched in the dark. It only need be observed, that _bestemmia_ and

_mangiar_ may be read in the first inscription, which was probably

written by a prisoner confined for some act of impiety committed at a

funeral; that _Cortellarius_ is the name of a parish on terra firma,

near the sea; and that the last initials evidently are put for _Viva la

santa Chiesa Kattolica Romana_.

2.

In Venice Tasso's echoes are no more.

Stanza iii. line 1.

["I cannot forbear mentioning a custom in Venice, which they tell me is

particular to the common people of this country, of singing stanzas out

of Tasso. They are set to a pretty solemn tune, and when one begins in

any part of the poet, it is odds but he will be answered by somebody

else that overhears him; so that sometimes you have ten or a dozen in

the neighbourhood of one another, taking verse after verse, and running

on with the poem as far as their memories will carry them."--Addison,

A.D. 1700.]

The well-known song of the gondoliers, of alternate stanzas from Tasso's

_Jerusalem_, has died with the independence of Venice. Editions of the

poem, with the original in one column, and the Venetian variations on

the other, as sung by the boatmen, were once common, and are still to be

found. The following extract will serve to show the difference between

the Tuscan epic and the _Canta alia Barcariola:_--

ORIGINAL.

Canto l'arme pietose, e 'l capitano

Che 'l gran Sepolcro libero di Cristo

Molto egli opro col senno, e con la mano

Molto soffri nel glorioso acquisto;

E in van l' Inferno a lui s' oppose, e in vano

S' armo d' Asia, e di Libia il popol misto,

Che il Ciel gli die favore, e sotto a i Santi

Segni ridusse i suoi compagni erranti.

VENETIAN.

L' arme pietose de cantar gho vogia,

E de Goffredo la immortal braura

Che al fin l' ha libera co strassia, e dogia

Del nostro buon Gesu la Sepoltura

De mezo mondo unite, e de quel Bogia

Missier Pluton non l' ha bu mai paura:

Dio l' ha agiuta, e i compagni sparpagni

Tutti 'l gh' i ha messi insieme i di del Dai.

Some of the elder gondoliers will, however, take up and continue a

stanza of their once familiar bard.

On the 7th of last January, the author of _Childe Harold_, and another

Englishman, the writer of this notice, rowed to the Lido with two

singers, one of whom was a carpenter, and the other a gondolier. The

former placed himself at the prow, the latter at the stern of the boat.

A little after leaving the quay of the Piazzetta, they began to sing,

and continued their exercise until we arrived at the island. They gave

us, amongst other essays, the death of Clorinda, and the palace of

Armida; and did not sing the Venetian but the Tuscan verses. The

carpenter, however, who was the cleverer of the two, and was frequently

obliged to prompt his companion, told us that he could _translate_ the

original. He added, that he could sing almost three hundred stanzas, but

had not spirits (_morbin_ was the word he used) to learn any more, or to

sing what he already knew: a man must have idle time on his hands to

acquire, or to repeat, and, said the poor fellow, "look at my clothes

and at me; I am starving." This speech was more affecting than his

performance, which habit alone can make attractive. The recitative was

shrill, screaming, and monotonous; and the gondolier behind assisted his

voice by holding his hand to one side of his mouth. The carpenter used a

quiet action, which he evidently endeavoured to restrain; but was too

much interested in his subject altogether to repress. From these men we

learnt that singing is not confined to the gondoliers, and that,

although the chant is seldom, if ever, voluntary, there are still

several amongst the lower classes who are acquainted with a few stanzas.

It does not appear that it is usual for the performers to row and sing

at the same time. Although the verses of the _Jerusalem_ are no longer

casually heard, there is yet much music upon the Venetian canals; and

upon holydays, those strangers who are not near or informed enough to

distinguish the words, may fancy that many of the gondolas still resound

with the strains of Tasso. The writer of some remarks which appeared in

the _Curiosities of Literature_ must excuse his being twice quoted; for,

with the exception of some phrases a little too ambitious and

extravagant, he has furnished a very exact, as well as agreeable

description:--

"In Venice the gondoliers know by heart long passages from Ariosto and

Tasso, and often chant them with a peculiar melody. But this talent

seems at present on the decline:--at least, after taking some pains, I

could find no more than two persons who delivered to me in this way a

passage from Tasso. I must add, that the late Mr. Berry once chanted to

me a passage in Tasso in the manner, as he assured me, of the

gondoliers.

"There are always two concerned, who alternately sing the strophes. We

know the melody eventually by Rousseau, to whose songs it is printed; it

has properly no melodious movement, and is a sort of medium between the

canto fermo and the canto figurato; it approaches to the former by

recitativical declamation, and to the latter by passages and course, by

which one syllable is detained and embellished.

"I entered a gondola by moonlight; one singer placed himself forwards

and the other aft, and thus proceeded to St. Georgio. One began the

song: when he had ended his strophe, the other took up the lay, and so

continued the song alternately. Throughout the whole of it, the same

notes invariably returned; but, according to the subject-matter of the

strophe, they laid a greater or a smaller stress, sometimes on one, and

sometimes on another note, and indeed changed the enunciation of the

whole strophe as the object of the poem altered.

"On the whole, however, the sounds were hoarse and screaming: they

seemed, in the manner of all rude uncivilised men, to make the

excellency of their singing in the force of their voice. One seemed

desirous of conquering the other by the strength of his lungs; and so

far from receiving delight from this scene (shut up as I was in the box

of the gondola), I found myself in a very unpleasant situation.

"My companion, to whom I communicated this circumstance, being very

desirous to keep up the credit of his countrymen, assured me that the

singing was very delightful when heard at a distance. Accordingly we got

out upon the shore, leaving one of the singers in the gondola, while the

other went to the distance of some hundred paces. They now began to sing

against one another, and I kept walking up and down between them both,

so as always to leave him who was to begin his part. I frequently stood

still and hearkened to the one and to the other.

"Here the scene was properly introduced. The strong declamatory, and, as

it were, shrieking sound, met the ear from far, and called forth the

attention; the quickly succeeding transitions, which necessarily

required to be sung in a lower tone, seemed like plaintive strains

succeeding the vociferations of emotion or of pain. The other, who

listened attentively, immediately began where the former left off,

answering him in milder or more vehement notes, according as the purport

of the strophe required. The sleepy canals, the lofty buildings, the

splendour of the moon, the deep shadows of the few gondolas that moved

like spirits hither and thither, increased the striking peculiarity of

the scene; and, amidst all these circumstances, it was easy to confess

the character of this wonderful harmony.

"It suits perfectly well with an idle, solitary mariner, lying at length

in his vessel at rest on one of these canals, waiting for his company,

or for a fare, the tiresomeness of which situation is somewhat

alleviated by the songs and poetical stories he has in memory. He often

raises his voice as loud as he can, which extends itself to a vast

distance over the tranquil mirror; and as all is still around, he is, as

it were, in a solitude in the midst of a large and populous town. Here

is no rattling of carriages, no noise of foot passengers; a silent

gondola glides now and then by him, of which the splashings of the oars

are scarcely to be heard.

"At a distance he hears another, perhaps utterly unknown to him. Melody

and verse immediately attach the two strangers; he becomes the

responsive echo to the former, and exerts himself to be heard as he had

heard the other. By a tacit convention they alternate verse for verse;

though the song should last the whole night through, they entertain

themselves without fatigue: the hearers who are passing between the two

take part in the amusement.

"This vocal performance sounds best at a great distance, and is then

inexpressibly charming, as it only fulfills its design in the sentiment

of remoteness. It is plaintive, but not dismal in its sound, and at

times it is scarcely possible to refrain from tears. My companion, who

otherwise was not a very delicately organised person, said quite

unexpectedly: E singolare come quel canto intenerisce, e molto piu

quando lo cantano meglio.

"I was told that the women of Libo, the long row of islands that divides

the Adriatic from the Lagoons,[555] particularly the women of the

extreme districts of Malamocca and Palestrina, sing in like manner the

works of Tasso to these and similar tunes.

"They have the custom, when their husbands are fishing out at sea, to

sit along the shore in the evenings and vociferate these songs, and

continue to do so with great violence, till each of them can distinguish

the responses of her own husband at a distance."[556]

The love of music and of poetry distinguishes all classes of Venetians,

even amongst the tuneful sons of Italy. The city itself can occasionally

furnish respectable audiences for two and even three opera-houses at a

time; and there are few events in private life that do not call forth a

printed and circulated sonnet. Does a physician or a lawyer take his

degree, or a clergyman preach his maiden sermon, has a surgeon performed

an operation, would a harlequin announce his departure or his benefit,

are you to be congratulated on a marriage, or a birth, or a lawsuit, the

Muses are invoked to furnish the same number of syllables, and the

individual triumphs blaze abroad in virgin white or party-coloured

placards on half the corners of the capital. The last curtsy of a

favourite "prima donna" brings down a shower of these poetical tributes

from those upper regions, from which, in our theatres, nothing but

cupids and snowstorms are accustomed to descend. There is a poetry in

the very life of a Venetian, which, in its common course, is varied with

those surprises and changes so recommendable in fiction, but so

different from the sober monotony of northern existence; amusements are

raised into duties, duties are softened into amusements, and every

object being considered as equally making a part of the business of

life, is announced and performed with the same earnest indifference and

gay assiduity. The Venetian gazette constantly closes its columns with

the following triple advertisement:--

_Charade._

Exposition of the most Holy Sacrament in the church of St.----

_Theatres_.

St. Moses, opera.

St. Benedict, a comedy of characters.

St. Luke, repose.

When it is recollected what the Catholics believe their consecrated

wafer to be, we may perhaps think it worthy of a more respectable niche

than between poetry and the playhouse.

3.

St. Mark yet sees his Lion where he stood

Stand.

Stanza xi. line 5.

The Lion has lost nothing by his journey to the Invalides, but the

gospel which supported the paw that is now on a level with the other

foot. The horses also are returned [A.D. 1815] to the ill-chosen spot

whence they set out, and are, as before, half hidden under the porch

window of St. Mark's Church. Their history, after a desperate struggle,

has been satisfactorily explored. The decisions and doubts of Erizzo and

Zanetti, and lastly, of the Count Leopold Cicognara, would have given

them a Roman extraction, and a pedigree not more ancient than the reign

of Nero. But M. de Schlegel stepped in to teach the Venetians the value

of their own treasures; and a Greek vindicated, at last and for ever,

the pretension of his countrymen to this noble production[557]. M.

Mustoxidi has not been left without a reply; but, as yet, he has

received no answer. It should seem that the horses are irrevocably

Chian, and were transferred to Constantinople by Theodosius. Lapidary

writing is a favourite play of the Italians, and has conferred

reputation on more than one of their literary characters. One of the

best specimens of Bodoni's typography is a respectable volume of

inscriptions, all written by his friend Pacciaudi. Several were prepared

for the recovered horses. It is to be hoped the best was not selected,

when the following words were ranged in gold letters above the cathedral

porch:--

QUATUOR. EQUORUM. SIGNA. A. VENETIS. BYZANTIO.

CAPTA. AD. TEMP. D. MAR. A. R. S. MCCIV. POSITA.

QUAE. HOSTILIS. CUPIDITAS. A. MDCCIIIC. ABSTULERAT.

FRANC. I. IMP. PACIS. ORBI. DATAE. TROPHAEUM. A.

MDCCCXV. VICTOR. REDUXIT.

Nothing shall be said of the Latin, but it may be permitted to observe,

that the injustice of the Venetians in transporting the horses from

Constantinople [A.D. 1204] was at least equal to that of the French in

carrying them to Paris [A.D. 1797], and that it would have been more

prudent to have avoided all allusions to either robbery. An apostolic

prince should, perhaps, have objected to affixing over the principal

entrance of a metropolitan church an inscription having a reference to

any other triumphs than those of religion. Nothing less than the

pacification of the world can excuse such a solecism.

4.

The Suabian sued, and now the Austrian reigns--

An Emperor tramples where an Emperor knelt.

Stanza xii. lines 1 and 2.

After many vain efforts on the part of the Italians entirely to throw

off the yoke of Frederic Barbarossa, and as fruitless attempts of the

Emperor to make himself absolute master throughout the whole of his

Cisalpine dominions, the bloody struggles of four-and-twenty years were

happily brought to a close in the city of Venice. The articles of a

treaty had been previously agreed upon between Pope Alexander III. and

Barbarossa; and the former having received a safe-conduct, had already

arrived at Venice from Ferrara, in company with the ambassadors of the

King of Sicily and the consuls of the Lombard League. There still

remained, however, many points to adjust, and for several days the peace

was believed to be impracticable. At this juncture, it was suddenly

reported that the Emperor had arrived at Chioza, a town fifteen miles

from the capital. The Venetians rose tumultuously, and insisted upon

immediately conducting him to the city. The Lombards took the alarm, and

departed towards Treviso. The Pope himself was apprehensive of some

disaster if Frederic should suddenly advance upon him, but was reassured

by the prudence and address of Sebastian Ziani, the Doge. Several

embassies passed between Chioza and the capital, until, at last, the

Emperor, relaxing somewhat of his pretensions, "laid aside his leonine

ferocity, and put on the mildness of the lamb."[558]

On Saturday, the 23rd of July, in the year 1177, six Venetian galleys

transferred Frederic, in great pomp, from Chioza to the island of Lido,

a mile from Venice. Early the next morning, the Pope, accompanied by the

Sicilian ambassadors, and by the envoys of Lombardy, whom he had

recalled from the main land, together with a great concourse of people,

repaired from the patriarchal palace to St. Mark's Church, and solemnly

absolved the Emperor and his partisans from the excommunication

pronounced against him. The Chancellor of the Empire, on the part of his

master, renounced the anti-popes and their schismatic adherents.

Immediately the Doge, with a great suite both of the clergy and laity,

got on board the galleys, and waiting on Frederic, rowed him in mighty

state from the Lido to the capital. The Emperor descended from the

galley at the quay of the Piazzetta. The Doge, the patriarch, his

bishops and clergy, and the people of Venice with their crosses and

their standards, marched in solemn procession before him to the church

of St. Mark. Alexander was seated before the vestibule of the basilica,

attended by his bishops and cardinals, by the patriarch of Aquileja, by

the archbishops and bishops of Lombardy, all of them in state, and

clothed in their church robes. Frederic approached--"moved by the Holy

Spirit, venerating the Almighty in the person of Alexander, laying aside

his imperial dignity, and throwing off his mantle, he prostrated himself

at full length at the feet of the Pope. Alexander, with tears in his

eyes, raised him benignantly from the ground, kissed him, blessed him;

and immediately the Germans of the train sang with a loud voice, 'We

praise thee, O Lord.' The Emperor then taking the Pope by the right

hand, led him to the church, and having received his benediction,

returned to the ducal palace."[559] The ceremony of humiliation was

repeated the next day. The Pope himself, at the request of Frederic,

said mass at St. Mark's. The Emperor again laid aside his imperial

mantle, and taking a wand in his hand, officiated as _verger_, driving

the laity from the choir, and preceding the pontiff to the altar.

Alexander, after reciting the gospel, preached to the people. The

Emperor put himself close to the pulpit in the attitude of listening;

and the pontiff, touched by this mark of his attention (for he knew that

Frederic did not understand a word he said), commanded the patriarch of

Aquileja to translate the Latin discourse into the German tongue. The

creed was then chanted. Frederic made his oblation, and kissed the

Pope's feet, and, mass being over, led him by the hand to his white

horse. He held the stirrup, and would have led the horse's rein to the

water side, had not the Pope accepted of the inclination for the

performance, and affectionately dismissed him with his benediction. Such

is the substance of the account left by the archbishop of Salerno, who

was present at the ceremony, and whose story is confirmed by every

subsequent narration. It would be not worth so minute a record, were it

not the triumph of liberty as well as of superstition. The states of

Lombardy owed to it the confirmation of their privileges; and Alexander

had reason to thank the Almighty, who had enabled an infirm, unarmed

old man to subdue a terrible and potent sovereign.[560]

5.

Oh for one hour of blind old Dandolo!

Th' octogenarian chief, Byzantium's conquering foe.

Stanza xii. lines 8 and 9.

The reader will recollect the exclamation of the Highlander, "_Oh, for

one hour of Dundee_!" Henry Dandolo, when elected Doge, in 1192, was

eighty-five years of age. When he commanded the Venetians at the taking

of Constantinople, he was consequently ninety-seven years old. At this

age he annexed the fourth and a half of the whole empire of

Romania,[561] for so the Roman empire was then called, to the title and

to the territories of the Venetian Doge. The three-eighths of this

empire were preserved in the diplomas until the Dukedom of Giovanni

Dolfino, who made use of the above designation in the year 1357.[562]

Dandolo led the attack on Constantinople in person. Two ships, the

Paradise and the Pilgrim, were tied together, and a drawbridge or ladder

let down from their higher yards to the walls. The Doge was one of the

first to rush into the city. Then was completed, said the Venetians, the

prophecy of the Erythraean sibyl:--"A gathering together of the powerful

shall be made amidst the waves of the Adriatic, under a blind leader;

they shall beset the goat--they shall profane Byzantium--they shall

blacken her buildings--her spoils shall be dispersed; a new goat shall

bleat until they have measured out and run over fifty-four feet nine

inches and a half."[563] Dandolo died on the first day of June, 1205,

having reigned thirteen years six months and five days, and was buried

in the church of St. Sophia, at Constantinople. Strangely enough it must

sound, that the name of the rebel apothecary who received the Doge's

sword, and annihilated the ancient government, in 1796-7, was Dandolo.

6.

But is not Doria's menace come to pass?

Are they not _bridled?_

Stanza xiii. lines 3 and 4.

After the loss of the battle of Pola, and the taking of Chioza on the

16th of August, 1379, by the united armament of the Genoese and

Francesco da Carrara, Signor of Padua, the Venetians were reduced to the

utmost despair. An embassy was sent to the conquerors with a blank sheet

of paper, praying them to prescribe what terms they pleased, and leave

to Venice only her independence. The Prince of Padua was inclined to

listen to these proposals; but the Genoese, who, after the victory at

Pola, had shouted, "To Venice! to Venice! and long live St. George!"

determined to annihilate their rival; and Peter Doria, their

commander-in-chief, returned this answer to the suppliants: "On God's

faith, gentlemen of Venice, ye shall have no peace from the Signer of

Padua, nor from our commune of Genoa, until we have first put a rein

upon those unbridled horses of yours, that are upon the porch of your

evangelist St. Mark. When we have bridled them we shall keep you quiet.

And this is the pleasure of us and of our commune. As for these, my

brothers of Genoa, that you have brought with you to give up to us, I

will not have them: take them back; for in a few days hence, I shall

come and let them out of prison myself, both these and all the others"

[p. 727, E. _vide infra_]. In fact, the Genoese did advance as far as

Malamocco, within five miles of the capital; but their own danger, and

the pride of their enemies, gave courage to the Venetians, who made

prodigious efforts, and many individual sacrifices, all of them

carefully recorded by their historians. Vettor Pisani was put at the

head of thirty-four galleys. The Genoese broke up from Malamocco, and

retired to Chioza in October; but they again threatened Venice, which

was reduced to extremities. At this time, the 1st of January, 1380,

arrived Carlo Zeno, who had been cruising on the Genoese coast with

fourteen galleys. The Venetians were now strong enough to besiege the

Genoese. Doria was killed on the 22nd of January, by a stone bullet, one

hundred and ninety-five pounds' weight, discharged from a bombard called

the Trevisan. Chioza was then closely invested; five thousand

auxiliaries, among whom were some English condottieri, commanded by one

Captain Ceccho, joined the Venetians. The Genoese, in their turn, prayed

for conditions, but none were granted, until, at last, they surrendered

at discretion; and, on the 24th of June, 1380, the Doge Contarini made

his triumphal entry into Chioza. Four thousand prisoners, nineteen

galleys, many smaller vessels and barks, with all the ammunition and

arms, and outfit of the expedition, fell into the hands of the

conquerors, who, had it not been for the inexorable answer of Doria,

would have gladly reduced their dominion to the city of Venice. An

account of these transactions is found in a work called _The War of

Chioza_,[564] written by Daniel Chinazzo, who was in Venice at the time.

7.

Thin streets, and foreign aspects, such as must

Too oft remind her who and what enthrals.

Stanza xv. lines 7 and 8.

The population of Venice, at the end of the seventeenth century,

amounted to nearly two hundred thousand souls. At the last census, taken

two years ago [1816], it was no more than about one hundred and three

thousand; and it diminishes daily. The commerce and the official

employments, which were to be the unexhausted source of Venetian

grandeur, have both expired.[565] Most of the patrician mansions are

deserted, and would gradually disappear, had not the Government, alarmed

by the demolition of seventy-two during the last two years, expressly

forbidden this sad resource of poverty. Many remnants of the Venetian

nobility are now scattered, and confounded with the wealthier Jews upon

the banks of the Brenta, whose Palladian palaces have sunk, or are

sinking, in the general decay. Of the "gentiluomo Veneto," the name is

still known, and that is all. He is but the shadow of his former self,

but he is polite and kind. It surely may be pardoned to him if he is

querulous. Whatever may have been the vices of the republic, and

although the natural term of its existence may be thought by foreigners

to have arrived in the due course of mortality, only one sentiment can

be expected from the Venetians themselves. At no time were the subjects

of the republic so unanimous in their resolution to rally round the

standard of St. Mark, as when it was for the last time unfurled; and the

cowardice and the treachery of the few patricians who recommended the

fatal neutrality, were confined to the persons of the traitors

themselves. The present race cannot be thought to regret the loss of

their aristocratical forms, and too despotic government; they think only

on their vanished independence. They pine away at the remembrance, and

on this subject suspend for a moment their gay good humour. Venice may

be said, in the words of the Scripture, "to die daily;" and so general

and so apparent is the decline, as to become painful to a stranger, not

reconciled to the sight of a whole nation expiring, as it were, before

his eyes. So artificial a creation, having lost that principle which

called it into life and supported its existence, must fall to pieces at

once, and sink more rapidly than it rose. The abhorrence of slavery,

which drove the Venetians to the sea, has, since their disaster, forced

them to the land, where they may be at least overlooked amongst the

crowd of dependents, and not present the humiliating spectacle of a

whole nation loaded with recent chains. Their liveliness, their

affability, and that happy indifference which constitution alone can

give (for philosophy aspires to it in vain), have not sunk under

circumstances; but many peculiarities of costume and manner have by

degrees been lost; and the nobles, with a pride common to all Italians

who have been masters, have not been persuaded to parade their

insignificance. That splendour which was a proof and a portion of their

power, they would not degrade into the trappings of their subjection.

They retired from the space which they had occupied in the eyes of their

fellow citizens; their continuance in which would have been a symptom of

acquiescence, and an insult to those who suffered by the common

misfortune. Those who remained in the degraded capital, might be said

rather to haunt the scenes of their departed power, than to live in

them. The reflection, "who and what enthrals," will hardly bear a

comment from one who is, nationally, the friend and the ally of the

conqueror. It may, however, be allowed to say thus much, that to those

who wish to recover their independence, any masters must be an object of

detestation; and it may be safely foretold that this unprofitable

aversion will not have been corrected before Venice shall have sunk into

the slime of her choked canals.

8.

Watering the tree which bears his Lady's name

With his melodious tears, he gave himself to Fame.

Stanza xxx. lines 8 and 9.

Thanks to the critical acumen of a Scotchman, we now know as little of

Laura as ever.[566] The discoveries of the Abbe de Sade, his triumphs,

his sneers, can no longer instruct or amuse. We must not, however, think

that these memoirs[567] are as much a romance as Belisarius or the

Incas, although we are told so by Dr. Beattie, a great name, but a

little authority.[568] His "labour" has not been in vain,

notwithstanding his "love" has, like most other passions, made him

ridiculous.[569] The hypothesis which overpowered the struggling

Italians, and carried along less interested critics in its current, is

run out. We have another proof that we can never be sure that the

paradox, the most singular, and therefore having the most agreeable and

authentic air, will not give place to the re-established ancient

prejudice.

It seems, then, first, that Laura was born, lived, died, and was buried,

not in Avignon, but in the country. The fountains of the Sorga, the

thickets of Cabrieres, may resume their pretensions, and the exploded

_de la Bastie_ again be heard with complacency. The hypothesis of the

Abbe had no stronger props than the parchment sonnet and medal found on

the skeleton of the wife of Hugo de Sade, and the manuscript note to the

_Virgil_ of Petrarch, now in the Ambrosian library. If these proofs were

both incontestable, the poetry was written, the medal composed, cast,

and deposited within the space of twelve hours: and these deliberate

duties were performed round the carcass of one who died of the plague,

and was hurried to the grave on the day of her death. These documents,

therefore, are too decisive: they prove not the fact, but the forgery.

Either the sonnet or the Virgilian note must be a falsification. The

Abbe cites both as incontestably true; the consequent deduction is

inevitable--they are both evidently false.[570]

Secondly, Laura was never married, and was a haughty virgin rather than

that _tender and prudent_ wife who honoured Avignon, by making that town

the theatre of an honest French passion, and played off for one and

twenty years her _little machinery_ of alternate favours and

refusals[571] upon the first poet of the age. It was, indeed, rather too

unfair that a female should be made responsible for eleven children upon

the faith of a misinterpreted abbreviation, and the decision of a

librarian.[572] It is, however, satisfactory to think that the love of

Petrarch was not platonic. The happiness which he prayed to possess but

once and for a moment was surely not of the mind,[573] and something so

very real as a marriage project, with one who has been idly called a

shadowy nymph, may be, perhaps, detected in at least six places of his

own sonnets. The love of Petrarch was neither platonic nor poetical; and

if in one passage of his works he calls it "amore veementeissimo ma

unico ed onesto," he confesses, in a letter to a friend, that it was

guilty and perverse, that it absorbed him quite, and mastered his heart.

In this case, however, he was perhaps alarmed for the culpability of his

wishes; for the Abbe de Sade himself, who certainly would not have been

scrupulously delicate if he could have proved his descent from Petrarch

as well as Laura, is forced into a stout defence of his virtuous

grandmother. As far as relates to the poet, we have no security for the

innocence, except perhaps in the constancy of his pursuit. He assures us

in his epistle to posterity, that, when arrived at his fortieth year, he

not only had in horror, but had lost all recollection and image of any

"irregularity." But the birth of his natural daughter cannot be assigned

earlier than his thirty-ninth year; and either the memory or the

morality of the poet must have failed him, when he forgot or was guilty

of this _slip_.[574] The weakest argument for the purity of this love

has been drawn from the permanence of its effects, which survived the

object of his passion. The reflection of M. de la Bastie, that virtue

alone is capable of making impressions which death cannot efface, is

one of those which everybody applauds, and everybody finds not to be

true, the moment he examines his own breast or the records of human

feeling.[575] Such apophthegms can do nothing for Petrarch or for the

cause of morality, except with the very weak and the very young. He that

has made even a little progress beyond ignorance and pupilage cannot be

edified with anything but truth. What is called vindicating the honour

of an individual or a nation, is the most futile, tedious, and

uninstructive of all writing; although it will always meet with more

applause than that sober criticism, which is attributed to the malicious

desire of reducing a great man to the common standard of humanity. It

is, after all, not unlikely that our historian was right in retaining

his favourite hypothetic salvo, which secures the author, although it

scarcely saves the honour of the still unknown mistress of

Petrarch.[576]

9.

They keep his dust in Arqua, where he died.

Stanza xxxi. line 1.

Petrarch retired to Arqua immediately on his return from the

unsuccessful attempt to visit Urban V. at Rome, in the year 1370, and

with the exception of his celebrated visit to Venice in company with

Francesco Novello da Carrara, he appears to have passed the four last

years of his life between that charming solitude and Padua. For four

months previous to his death he was in a state of continual languor, and

in the morning of July the 19th, in the year 1374, was found dead in his

library chair with his head resting upon a book. The chair is still

shown amongst the precious relics of Arqua, which, from the

uninterrupted veneration that has been attached to everything relative

to this great man from the moment of his death to the present hour,

have, it may be hoped, a better chance of authenticity than the

Shaksperian memorials of Stratford-upon-Avon.

Arqua (for the last syllable is accented in pronunciation, although the

analogy of the English language has been observed in the verse) is

twelve miles from Padua, and about three miles on the right of the high

road to Rovigo, in the bosom of the Euganean hills. After a walk of

twenty minutes across a flat well-wooded meadow, you come to a little

blue lake, clear but fathomless, and to the foot of a succession of

acclivities and hills, clothed with vineyards and orchards, rich with

fir and pomegranate trees, and every sunny fruit shrub. From the banks

of the lake the road winds into the hills, and the church of Arqua is

soon seen between a cleft where two ridges slope towards each other, and

nearly enclose the village. The houses are scattered at intervals on the

steep sides of these summits; and that of the poet is on the edge of a

little knoll overlooking two descents, and commanding a view, not only

of the glowing gardens in the dales immediately beneath, but of the wide

plains, above whose low woods of mulberry and willow, thickened into a

dark mass by festoons of vines, tall, single cypresses, and the spires

of towns, are seen in the distance, which stretches to the mouths of the

Po and the shores of the Adriatic. The climate of these volcanic hills

is warmer, and the vintage begins a week sooner than in the plains of

Padua. Petrarch is laid, for he cannot be said to be buried, in a

sarcophagus of red marble, raised on four pilasters on an elevated base,

and preserved from an association with meaner tombs. It stands

conspicuously alone, but will be soon overshadowed by four lately

planted laurels. Petrarch's Fountain, for here everything is Petrarch's,

springs and expands itself beneath an artificial arch, a little below

the church, and abounds plentifully, in the driest season, with that

soft water which was the ancient wealth of the Euganean hills. It would

be more attractive, were it not, in some seasons, beset with hornets and

wasps. No other coincidence could assimilate the tombs of Petrarch and

Archilochus. The revolutions of centuries have spared these sequestered

valleys, and the only violence which has been offered to the ashes of

Petrarch was prompted, not by hate, but veneration. An attempt was made

to rob the sarcophagus of its treasure, and one of the arms was stolen

by a Florentine through a rent which is still visible. The injury is not

forgotten, but has served to identify the poet with the country where he

was born, but where he would not live. A peasant boy of Arqua being

asked who Petrarch was, replied, "that the people of the parsonage knew

all about him, but that he only knew that he was a Florentine."

Mr. Forsyth[577] was not quite correct in saying that Petrarch never

returned to Tuscany after he had once quitted it when a boy. It appears

he did pass through Florence on his way from Parma to Rome, and on his

return in the year 1350, and remained there long enough to form some

acquaintance with its most distinguished inhabitants. A Florentine

gentleman, ashamed of the aversion of the poet for his native country,

was eager to point out this trivial error in our accomplished traveller,

whom he knew and respected for an extraordinary capacity, extensive

erudition, and refined taste, joined to that engaging simplicity of

manners which has been so frequently recognised as the surest, though it

is certainly not an indispensable, trait of superior genius.

Every footstep of Laura's lover has been anxiously traced and recorded.

The house in which he lodged is shown in Venice. The inhabitants of

Arezzo, in order to decide the ancient controversy between their city

and the neighbouring Ancisa, where Petrarch was carried when seven

months old, and remained until his seventh year, have designated by a

long inscription the spot where their great fellow citizen was born. A

tablet has been raised to him at Parma, in the chapel of St. Agatha, at

the cathedral, because he was arch-deacon of that society, and was only

snatched from his intended sepulture in their church by a _foreign_

death. Another tablet, with a bust, has been erected to him at Pavia, on

account of his having passed the autumn of 1368 in that city, with his

son-in-law Brossano. The political condition which has for ages

precluded the Italians from the criticism of the living, has

concentrated their attention to the illustration of the dead.

10.

In face of all his foes, the Cruscan quire,

And Boileau, whose rash envy, etc.

Stanza xxxviii. lines 6 and 7.

Perhaps the couplet in which Boileau depreciates Tasso may serve as well

as any other specimen to justify the opinion given of the harmony of

French verse--

"A Malherbe, a Racan, prefere Theophile,

Et le clinquant du Tasse a tout l'or de Virgile."

_Sat_. ix. v. 176.

The biographer Serassi,[578] out of tenderness to the reputation either

of the Italian or the French poet, is eager to observe that the satirist

recanted or explained away this censure, and subsequently allowed the

author of the _Jerusalem_ to be "a genius sublime, vast, and happily

born for the higher flights of poetry." To this we will add, that the

recantation is far from satisfactory, when we examine the whole anecdote

as reported by Olivet.[579] The sentence pronounced against him by

Bouhours[580] is recorded only to the confusion of the critic, whose

_palinodia_ the Italian makes no effort to discover, and would not,

perhaps, accept. As to the opposition which the _Jerusalem_ encountered

from the Cruscan academy, who degraded Tasso from all competition with

Ariosto, below Bojardo and Pulci, the disgrace of such opposition must

also in some measure be laid to the charge of Alfonso, and the court of

Ferrara. For Leonard Salviati, the principal and nearly the sole origin

of this attack, was, there can be no doubt,[581] influenced by a hope to

acquire the favour of the House of Este: an object which he thought

attainable by exalting the reputation of a native poet at the expense of

a rival, then a _prisoner of state_. The hopes and efforts of Salviati

must serve to show the contemporary opinion as to the nature of the

poet's imprisonment; and will fill up the measure of our indignation at

the tyrant jailer.[582] In fact, the antagonist of Tasso was not

disappointed in the reception given to his criticism; he was called to

the court of Ferrara, where, having endeavoured to heighten his claims

to favour, by panegyrics on the family of his sovereign,[583] he was in

turn abandoned, and expired in neglected poverty. The opposition of the

Cruscans was brought to a close in six years after the commencement of

the controversy; and if the Academy owed its first renown to having

almost opened with such a paradox,[584] it is probable that, on the

other hand, the care of his reputation alleviated rather than aggravated

the imprisonment of the injured poet. The defence of his father and of

himself, for both were involved in the censure of Salviati, found

employment for many of his solitary hours, and the captive could have

been but little embarrassed to reply to accusations, where, among other

delinquencies, he was charged with invidiously omitting, in his

comparison between France and Italy, to make any mention of the cupola

of St. Maria del Fiore at Florence.[585] The late biographer of Ariosto

seems as if willing to renew the controversy by doubting the

interpretation of Tasso's self-estimation[586] related in Serassi's life

of the poet. But Tiraboschi had before laid that rivalry at rest,[587]

by showing that between Ariosto and Tasso it is not a question of

comparison, but of preference.

11.

The lightning rent from Ariosto's bust

The iron crown of laurel's mimicked leaves.

Stanza xli. lines 1 and 2.

Before the remains of Ariosto were removed from the Benedictine church

to the library of Ferrara, his bust, which surmounted the tomb, was

struck by lightning, and a crown of iron laurels melted away. The event

has been recorded by a writer of the last century.[588] The transfer of

these sacred ashes, on the 6th of June, 1801, was one of the most

brilliant spectacles of the short-lived Italian Republic; and to

consecrate the memory of the ceremony, the once famous fallen

_Intrepidi_ were revived and reformed into the Ariostean academy. The

large public place through which the procession paraded was then for the

first time called Ariosto Square. The author of the _Orlando_ is

jealously claimed as the Homer, not of Italy but Ferrara.[589] The

mother of Ariosto was of Reggio, and the house in which he was born is

carefully distinguished by a tablet with these words: "Qui nacque

Ludovico Ariosto il giorno 8. di Settembre dell' anno 1474." But the

Ferrarese make light of the accident by which their poet was born

abroad, and claim him exclusively for their own. They possess his bones,

they show his arm-chair, and his inkstand, and his autographs.

"......Hic illius anna,

Hic currus fuit......"

The house where he lived, the room where he died, are designated by his

own replaced memorial,[590] and by a recent inscription. The Ferrarese

are more jealous of their claims since the animosity of Denina, arising

from a cause which their apologists mysteriously hint is not unknown to

them, ventured to degrade their soil and climate to a Boeotian in

capacity for all spiritual productions. A quarto volume has been called

forth by the detraction, and this supplement to Barotti's Memoirs of the

illustrious Ferarrese, has been considered a triumphant reply to the

"Quadro Storico Statistico dell' Alta Italia."

12.

For the true laurel-wreath which Glory weaves

Is of the tree no bolt of thunder cleaves.

Stanza xli. lines 4 and 5.

The eagle, the sea calf, the laurel, and the white vine,[591] were

amongst the most approved preservatives against lightning: Jupiter chose

the first, Augustus Caesar the second, and Tiberius never failed to wear

a wreath of the third when the sky threatened a thunder-storm.[592]

These superstitions may be received without a sneer in a country where

the magical properties of the hazel twig have not lost all their credit;

and perhaps the reader may not be much surprised that a commentator on

Suetonius has taken upon himself gravely to disprove the imputed virtues

of the crown of Tiberius, by mentioning that a few years before he wrote

a laurel was actually struck by lightning at Rome.[593]

13.

Know, that the lightning sanctifies below.

Stanza xli. line 8.

The Curtian lake and the Ruminal fig-tree in the Forum, having been

touched by lightning, were held sacred, and the memory of the accident

was preserved by a _pateal_, or altar resembling the mouth of a well,

with a little chapel covering the cavity supposed to be made by the

thunder-bolt. Bodies scathed and persons struck dead were thought to be

incorruptible;[594] and a stroke not fatal conferred perpetual dignity

upon the man so distinguished by heaven.[595]

Those killed by lightning were wrapped in a white garment, and buried

where they fell. The superstition was not confined to the worshippers of

Jupiter: the Lombards believed in the omens furnished by lightning; and

a Christian priest confesses that, by a diabolical skill in interpreting

thunder, a seer foretold to Agilulf, duke of Turin, an event which came

to pass, and gave him a queen and a crown.[596] There was, however,

something equivocal in this sign, which the ancient inhabitants of Rome

did not always consider propitious; and as the fears are likely to last

longer than the consolations of superstition, it is not strange that the

Romans of the age of Leo X. should have been so much terrified at some

misinterpreted storms as to require the exhortations of a scholar, who

arrayed all the learning on thunder and lightning to prove the omen

favourable; beginning with the flash which struck the walls of Velitrae;,

and including that which played upon a gate at Florence, and foretold

the pontificate of one of its citizens.[597]

14.

There, too, the Goddess loves in stone.

Stanza xlix. line 1.

The view of the Venus of Medicis instantly suggests the lines in the

_Seasons_; and the comparison of the object with the description proves,

not only the correctness of the portrait, but the peculiar turn of

thought, and, if the term may be used, the sexual imagination of the

descriptive poet. The same conclusion may be deduced from another hint

in the same episode of Musidora; for Thomson's notion of the privileges

of favoured love must have been either very primitive, or rather

deficient in delicacy, when he made his grateful nymph inform her

discreet Damon that in some happier moment he might perhaps be the

companion of her bath:--

"The time may come you need not fly."

The reader will recollect the anecdote told in the _Life of Dr.

Johnson_. We will not leave the Florentine gallery without a word on the

_Whetter_. It seems strange that the character of that disputed statue

should not be entirely decided, at least in the mind of any one who has

seen a sarcophagus in the vestibule of the Basilica of St. Paul without

the walls, at Rome, where the whole group of the fable of Marsyas is

seen in tolerable preservation; and the Scythian slave whetting the

knife, is represented exactly in the same position as this celebrated

masterpiece. The slave is not naked; but it is easier to get rid of this

difficulty than to suppose the knife in the hand of the Florentine

statue an instrument for shaving, which it must be, if, as Lanzi

supposes, the man is no other than the barber of Julius Caesar.

Winckelmann, illustrating a bas-relief of the same subject, follows the

opinion of Leonard Agostini, and his authority might have been thought

conclusive, even if the resemblance did not strike the most careless

observer.[598] Amongst the bronzes of the same princely collection, is

still to be seen the inscribed tablet copied and commented upon by Mr.

Gibbon.[599] Our historian found some difficulties, but did not desist

from his illustration. He might be vexed to hear that his criticism has

been thrown away on an inscription now generally recognised to be a

forgery.

15.

In Santa Croce's holy precincts lie.

Stanza liv. line 1.

This name will recall the memory, not only of those whose tombs have

raised the Santa Croce into the centre of pilgrimage--the Mecca of

Italy--but of her whose eloquence was poured over the illustrious ashes,

and whose voice is now as mute as those she sung. Corinna is no more;

and with her should expire the fear, the flattery, and the envy, which

threw too dazzling or too dark a cloud round the march of genius, and

forbad the steady gaze of disinterested criticism. We have her picture

embellished or distorted, as friendship or detraction has held the

pencil: the impartial portrait was hardly to be expected from a

contemporary. The immediate voice of her survivors will, it is probable,

be far from affording a just estimate of her singular capacity. The

gallantry, the love of wonder, and the hope of associated fame, which

blunted the edge of censure, must cease to exist.--The dead have no sex;

they can surprise by no new miracles; they can confer no privilege:

Corinna has ceased to be a woman--she is only an author; and it may be

foreseen that many will repay themselves for former complaisance, by a

severity to which the extravagance of previous praises may perhaps give

the colour of truth. The latest posterity--for to the latest posterity

they will assuredly descend--will have to pronounce upon her various

productions; and the longer the vista through which they are seen, the

more accurately minute will be the object, the more certain the justice,

of the decision. She will enter into that existence in which the great

writers of all ages and nations are, as it were, associated in a world

of their own, and, from that superior sphere, shed their eternal

influence for the control and consolation of mankind. But the individual

will gradually disappear as the author is more distinctly seen; some

one, therefore, of all those whom the charms of involuntary wit, and of

easy hospitality, attracted within the friendly circles of Coppet,

should rescue from oblivion those virtues which, although they are said

to love the shade, are, in fact, more frequently chilled than excited by

the domestic cares of private life. Some one should be found to portray

the unaffected graces with which she adorned those dearer relationships,

the performance of whose duties is rather discovered amongst the

interior secrets, than seen in the outward management, of family

intercourse; and which, indeed, it requires the delicacy of genuine

affection to qualify for the eye of an indifferent spectator. Some one

should be found, not to celebrate, but to describe, the amiable mistress

of an open mansion, the centre of a society, ever varied, and always

pleased, the creator of which, divested of the ambition and the arts of

public rivalry, shone forth only to give fresh animation to those around

her. The mother tenderly affectionate and tenderly beloved, the friend

unboundedly generous, but still esteemed, the charitable patroness of

all distress, cannot be forgotten by those whom she cherished, and

protected, and fed. Her loss will be mourned the most where she was

known the best; and, to the sorrows of very many friends, and more

dependants, may be offered the disinterested regret of a stranger, who,

amidst the sublimer scenes of the Leman lake, received his chief

satisfaction from contemplating the engaging qualities of the

incomparable Corinna.

16.

Here repose

Angelo's--Alfieri's bones.

Stanza liv. lines 6 and 7.

Alfieri is the great name of this age. The Italians, without waiting for

the hundred years, consider him as "a poet good in law."--His memory is

the more dear to them because he is the bard of freedom; and because, as

such, his tragedies can receive no countenance from any of their

sovereigns. They are but very seldom, and but very few of them, allowed

to be acted. It was observed by Cicero, that nowhere were the true

opinions and feelings of the Romans so clearly shown as at the

theatre.[600] In the autumn of 1816, a celebrated improvisatore

exhibited his talents at the Opera-house of Milan. The reading of the

theses handed in for the subjects of his poetry was received by a very

numerous audience, for the most part in silence, or with laughter; but

when the assistant, unfolding one of the papers, exclaimed _The

apotheosis of Victor Alfieri_, the whole theatre burst into a shout, and

the applause was continued for some moments. The lot did not fall on

Alfieri; and the Signor Sgricci had to pour forth his extemporary

common-places on the bombardment of Algiers. The choice, indeed, is not

left to accident quite so much as might be thought from a first view of

the ceremony; and the police not only takes care to look at the papers

beforehand, but, in case of any prudential afterthought, steps in to

correct the blindness of chance. The proposal for deifying Alfieri was

received with immediate enthusiasm, the rather because it was

conjectured there would be no opportunity of carrying it into effect.

17.

Here Machiavelli's earth returned to whence it rose.

Stanza liv. line 9.

The affectation of simplicity in sepulchral inscriptions, which so often

leaves us uncertain whether the structure before us is an actual

depository, or a cenotaph, or a simple memorial not of death but life,

has given to the tomb of Machiavelli no information as to the place or

time of the birth or death, the age or parentage, of the historian.

TANTO NOMINI NVLLVM PAR ELOGIVM

NICCOLAVS MACHIAVELLI.

There seems at least no reason why the name should not have been put

above the sentence which alludes to it.

It will readily be imagined that the prejudices which have passed the

name of Machiavelli into an epithet proverbial of iniquity exist no

longer at Florence. His memory was persecuted, as his life had been, for

an attachment to liberty incompatible with the new system of despotism,

which succeeded the fall of the free governments of Italy. He was put to

the torture for being a "libertine," that is, for wishing to restore the

republic of Florence; and such are the undying efforts of those who are

interested in the perversion, not only of the nature of actions, but the

meaning of words, that what was once _patriotism_, has by degrees come

to signify _debauch_. We have ourselves outlived the old meaning of

"liberality," which is now another word for treason in one country and

for infatuation in all. It seems to have been a strange mistake to

accuse the author of _The Prince_, as being a pander to tyranny; and to

think that the Inquisition would condemn his work for such a

delinquency. The fact is, that Machiavelli, as is usual with those

against whom no crime can be proved, was suspected of and charged with

atheism; and the first and last most violent opposers of _The Prince_

were both Jesuits, one of whom persuaded the Inquisition "benche fosse

tardo," to prohibit the treatise, and the other qualified the secretary

of the Florentine republic as no better than a fool. The father Possevin

was proved never to have read the book, and the father Lucchesini not to

have understood it. It is clear, however, that such critics must have

objected not to the slavery of the doctrines, but to the supposed

tendency of a lesson which shows how distinct are the interests of a

monarch from the happiness of mankind. The Jesuits are re-established in

Italy, and the last chapter of _The Prince_ may again call forth a

particular refutation from those who are employed once more in moulding

the minds of the rising generation, so as to receive the impressions of

despotism. The chapter [xxvi.] bears for title, "Esortazione a liberare

l'Italia da' Barbari," and concludes with a _libertine_ excitement to

the future redemption of Italy. "Non si deve adunque lasciar passare

questa occasione, acciocche la Italia vegga dopo tanto tempo apparire un

suo redentore. Ne posso esprimere con quale amore ei fusse ricevuto in

tutte quelle provincie, che hanno patito per queste illuvioni esterne,

con qual sete di vendetta, con che ostinata fede, con que pieta, con che

lacrime. Quali porte se gli serrerebbero? Quali popoli gli negherebbero

l'ubbidienza? Quale Italiano gli negherebbe l'ossequio? AD OGNUNO PUZZA

QUESTO BARBARO DOMINIO."[601]

18.

Ungrateful Florence! Dante sleeps afar.

Stanza lvii. line 1.

Dante was born in Florence, in the year 1261. He fought in two battles,

was fourteen times ambassador, and once prior of the republic. When the

party of Charles of Anjou triumphed over the Bianchi, he was absent on

an embassy to Pope Boniface VIII., and was condemned to two years'

banishment, and to a fine of 8000 lire; on the non-payment of which he

was further punished by the sequestration of all his property. The

republic, however, was not content with this satisfaction, for in 1772

was discovered in the archives at Florence a sentence in which Dante is

the eleventh of a list of fifteen condemned in 1302 to be burnt alive;

_Talis perveniens igne comburatur sic quod moriatur_. The pretext for

this judgment was a proof of unfair barter, extortions, and illicit

gains. _Baracteriarum iniquarum extorsionum et illicitorum

lucrorum_,[602] and with such an accusation it is not strange that Dante

should have always protested his innocence, and the injustice of his

fellow-citizens. His appeal to Florence was accompanied by another to

the Emperor Henry; and the death of that Sovereign in 1313 was the

signal for a sentence of irrevocable banishment. He had before lingered

near Tuscany with hopes of recall; then travelled into the north of

Italy, where Verona had to boast of his longest residence; and he

finally settled at Ravenna, which was his ordinary but not constant

abode until his death. The refusal of the Venetians to grant him a

public audience, on the part of Guido Novello da Polenta, his protector,

is said to have been the principal cause of this event, which happened

in 1321. He was buried ("in sacra minorum aede") at Ravenna, in a

handsome tomb, which was erected by Guido, restored by Bernardo Bembo in

1483, praetor for that republic which had refused to hear him, again

restored by Cardinal Corsi, in 1692, and replaced by a more magnificent

sepulchre, constructed in 1780 at the expense of the Cardinal Luigi

Valenti Gonzaga. The offence or misfortune of Dante was an attachment to

a defeated party, and, as his least favourable biographers allege

against him, too great a freedom of speech and haughtiness of manner.

But the next age paid honours almost divine to the exile. The

Florentines, having in vain and frequently attempted to recover his

body, crowned his image in a church,[603] and his picture is still one

of the idols of their cathedral. They struck medals, they raised statues

to him. The cities of Italy, not being able to dispute about his own

birth, contended for that of his great poem, and the Florentines thought

it for their honour to prove that he had finished the seventh Canto

before they drove him from his native city. Fifty-one years after his

death, they endowed a professorial chair for the expounding of his

verses, and Boccaccio was appointed to this patriotic employment. The

example was imitated by Bologna and Pisa, and the commentators, if they

performed but little service to literature, augmented the veneration

which beheld a sacred or moral allegory in all the images of his mystic

muse. His birth and his infancy were discovered to have been

distinguished above those of ordinary men: the author of the

_Decameron_, his earliest biographer, relates that his mother was warned

in a dream of the importance of her pregnancy: and it was found, by

others, that at ten years of age he had manifested his precocious

passion for that wisdom or theology, which, under the name of Beatrice,

had been mistaken for a substantial mistress. When the _Divine Comedy_

had been recognised as a mere mortal production, and at the distance of

two centuries, when criticism and competition had sobered the judgment

of the Italians, Dante was seriously declared superior to Homer;[604]

and though the preference appeared to some casuists "an heretical

blasphemy worthy of the flames," the contest was vigorously maintained

for nearly fifty years. In later times it was made a question which of

the Lords of Verona could boast of having patronised him,[605] and the

jealous scepticism of one writer would not allow Ravenna the undoubted

possession of his bones. Even the critical Tiraboschi was inclined to

believe that the poet had foreseen and foretold one of the discoveries

of Galileo.--Like the great originals of other nations, his popularity

has not always maintained the same level. The last age seemed inclined

to undervalue him as a model and a study: and Bettinelli one day rebuked

his pupil Monti, for poring over the harsh and obsolete extravagances of

the _Commedia_. The present generation having recovered from the Gallic

idolatries of Cesarotti, has returned to the ancient worship, and the

_Danteggiare_ of the northern Italians is thought even indiscreet by the

more moderate Tuscans.

There is still much curious information relative to the life and

writings of this great poet, which has not as yet been collected even by

the Italians; but the celebrated Ugo Foscolo meditates to supply this

defect, and it is not to be regretted that this national work has been

reserved for one so devoted to his country and the cause of truth.

19.

Like Scipio, buried by the upbraiding shore:

Thy factions, in their worse than civil war,

Proscribed, etc.

Stanza lvii. lines 2, 3, and 4.

The elder Scipio Africanus had a tomb if he was not buried at Liternum,

whither he had retired to voluntary banishment. This tomb was near the

sea-shore, and the story of an inscription upon it, _Ingrata Patria_,

having given a name to a modern tower, is, if not true, an agreeable

fiction. If he was not buried, he certainly lived there.[606]

"In cosi angusta & solitaria uilla

Era grand' huom che d' Aphrica s' appella,

Perche prima col ferro al uiuo aprilla."[607]

Ingratitude is generally supposed the vice peculiar to republics; and

it seems to be forgotten that for one instance of popular inconstancy,

we have a hundred examples of the fall of courtly favourites. Besides, a

people have often repented--a monarch seldom or never. Leaving apart

many familiar proofs of this fact, a short story may show the difference

between even an aristocracy and the multitude.

Vettor Pisani, having been defeated in 1354 at Portolongo, and many

years afterwards in the more decisive action of Pola, by the Genoese,

was recalled by the Venetian government, and thrown into chains. The

Avvogadori proposed to behead him, but the supreme tribunal was content

with the sentence of imprisonment. Whilst Pisani was suffering this

unmerited disgrace, Chioza, in the vicinity of the capital,[608] was, by

the assistance of the _Signor of Padua_, delivered into the hands of

Pietro Doria. At the intelligence of that disaster, the great bell of

St. Mark's tower tolled to arms, and the people and the soldiery of the

galleys were summoned to the repulse of the approaching enemy; but they

protested they would not move a step, unless Pisani were liberated and

placed at their head. The great council was instantly assembled: the

prisoner was called before them, and the Doge, Andrea Contarini,

informed him of the demands of the people, and the necessities of the

state, whose only hope of safety was reposed in his efforts, and who

implored him to forget the indignities he had endured in her service. "I

have submitted," replied the magnanimous republican, "I have submitted

to your deliberations without complaint; I have supported patiently the

pains of imprisonment, for they were inflicted at your command: this is

no time to inquire whether I deserved them--the good of the republic may

have seemed to require it, and that which the republic resolves is

always resolved wisely. Behold me ready to lay down my life for the

preservation of my country." Pisani was appointed generalissimo, and, by

his exertions, in conjunction with those of Carlo Zeno, the Venetians

soon recovered the ascendancy over their maritime rivals.

The Italian communities were no less unjust to their citizens than the

Greek republics. Liberty, both with the one and the other, seems to have

been a national, not an individual object: and, notwithstanding the

boasted _equality before the laws_, which an ancient Greek writer[609]

considered the great distinctive mark between his countrymen and the

barbarians, the mutual rights of fellow citizens seem never to have been

the principal scope of the old democracies. The world may have not yet

seen an essay by the author of _The Italian Republics_, in which the

distinction between the liberty of former states, and the signification

attached to that word by the happier constitution of England, is

ingeniously developed. The Italians, however, when they had ceased to be

free, still looked back with a sigh upon those times of turbulence, when

every citizen might rise to a share of sovereign power, and have never

been taught fully to appreciate the repose of a monarchy. Sperone

Speroni, when Francis Maria II. Duke of Rovere proposed the question,

"which was preferable, the republic or the principality--the perfect and

not durable, or the less perfect and not so liable to change," replied,

"that our happiness is to be measured by its quality, not by its

duration; and that he preferred to live for one day like a man, than for

a hundred years like a brute, a stock, or a stone." This was thought,

and called a _magnificent_ answer down to the last days of Italian

servitude.[610]

20.

And the crown

Which Petrarch's laureate brow supremely wore,

Upon a far and foreign soil had grown.

Stanza lvii. lines 6, 7, and 8.

The Florentines did not take the opportunity of Petrarch's short visit

to their city in 1350 to revoke the decree which confiscated the

property of his father, who had been banished shortly after the exile of

Dante. His crown did not dazzle them; but when in the next year they

were in want of his assistance in the formation of their university,

they repented of their injustice, and Boccaccio was sent to Padua to

entreat the laureate to conclude his wanderings in the bosom of his

native country, where he might finish his _immortal Africa_, and enjoy,

with his recovered possessions, the esteem of all classes of his fellow

citizens. They gave him the option of the book and the science he might

condescend to expound: they called him the glory of his country, who was

dear, and who would be dearer to them; and they added, that if there was

anything unpleasing in their letter, he ought to return amongst them,

were it only to correct their style.[611] Petrarch seemed at first to

listen to the flattery and to the entreaties of his friend, but he did

not return to Florence, and preferred a pilgrimage to the tomb of Laura

and the shades of Vaucluse.

21.

Boccaccio to his parent earth bequeathed

His dust.

Stanza lviii. lines 1 and 2.

Boccaccio was buried in the church of St. Michael and St. James, at

Certaldo, a small town in the Valdelsa, which was by some supposed the

place of his birth. There he passed the latter part of his life in a

course of laborious study, which shortened his existence; and there

might his ashes have been secure, if not of honour, at least of repose.

But the "hyena bigots" of Certaldo tore up the tombstone of Boccaccio

and ejected it from the holy precincts of St. Michael and St. James. The

occasion, and, it may be hoped, the excuse, of this ejectment was the

making of a new floor for the church; but the fact is, that the

tombstone was taken up and thrown aside at the bottom of the building.

Ignorance may share the sin with bigotry. It would be painful to relate

such an exception to the devotion of the Italians for their great names,

could it not be accompanied by a trait more honourably conformable to

the general character of the nation. The principal person of the

district, the last branch of the house of Medicis, afforded that

protection to the memory of the insulted dead which her best ancestors

had dispensed upon all contemporary merit. The Marchioness Lenzoni

rescued the tombstone of Boccaccio from the neglect in which it had some

time lain, and found for it an honourable elevation in her own mansion.

She has done more: the house in which the poet lived has been as little

respected as his tomb, and is falling to ruin over the head of one

indifferent to the name of its former tenant. It consists of two or

three little chambers, and a low tower, on which Cosmo II. affixed an

inscription. This house she has taken measures to purchase, and

proposes to devote to it that care and consideration which are attached

to the cradle and to the roof of genius.

This is not the place to undertake the defence of Boccaccio; but the man

who exhausted his little patrimony in the acquirement of learning, who

was amongst the first, if not the first, to allure the science and the

poetry of Greece to the bosom of Italy;--who not only invented a new

style, but founded, or certainly fixed, a new language; who, besides the

esteem of every polite court of Europe, was thought worthy of employment

by the predominant republic of his own country, and, what is more, of

the friendship of Petrarch, who lived the life of a philosopher and a

freeman, and who died in the pursuit of knowledge,--such a man might

have found more consideration than he has met with from the priest of

Certaldo, and from a late English traveller, who strikes off his

portrait as an odious, contemptible, licentious writer, whose impure

remains should be suffered to rot without a record.[612] That English

traveller, unfortunately for those who have to deplore the loss of a

very amiable person, is beyond all criticism; but the mortality which

did not protect Boccaccio from Mr. Eustace, must not defend Mr. Eustace

from the impartial judgment of his successors. Death may canonise his

virtues, not his errors; and it may be modestly pronounced that he

transgressed, not only as an author, but as a man, when he evoked the

shade of Boccaccio in company with that of Aretine, amidst the

sepulchres of Santa Croce, merely to dismiss it with indignity. As far

as respects

"Il flagello de' Principi,

Il divin Pietro Aretino,"

The Works of Lord Byron. Vol. 2 · 第 6 / 7 章