TO HELEN

Helen, thy beauty is to me

Like those Nicean barks of yore,

That gently, o'er a perfumed sea,

The weary, way-worn wanderer bore

To his own native shore.

On desperate seas long wont to roam,

Thy hyacinth hair, thy classic face,

Thy Naiad airs have brought me home

To the glory that was Greece

And the grandeur that was Rome.

Lo! in yon brilliant window-niche

How statue-like I see thee stand!

The agate lamp within thy hand,

Ah! Psyche, from the regions which

Are Holy Land!

It is the _tendency_ of the young poet that impresses us. Here is no

"withering scorn," no heart "blighted" ere it has safely got into its

teens, none of the drawing-room sans-culottism which Byron had brought

into vogue. All is limpid and serene, with a pleasant dash of the Greek

Helicon in it. The melody of the whole, too, is remarkable. It is not of

that kind which can be demonstrated arithmetically upon the tips of the

fingers. It is of that finer sort which the inner ear alone can

estimate. It seems simple, like a Greek column, because of its

perfection. In a poem named "Ligeia," under which title he intended to

personify the music of nature, our boy-poet gives us the following

exquisite picture:

Ligeia! Ligeia!

My beautiful one,

Whose harshest idea

Will to melody run,

_Say, is it thy will_,

_On the breezes to toss_,

_Or, capriciously still_,

_Like the lone albatross_,

_Incumbent on night_,

_As she on the air_,

_To keep watch with delight_

_On the harmony there_?

John Neal, himself a man of genius, and whose lyre has been too long

capriciously silent, appreciated the high merit of these and similar

passages, and drew a proud horoscope for their author.

Mr. Poe had that indescribable something which men have agreed to call

_genius_. No man could ever tell us precisely what it is, and yet there

is none who is not inevitably aware of its presence and its power. Let

talent writhe and contort itself as it may, it has no such magnetism.

Larger of bone and sinew it may be, but the wings are wanting. Talent

sticks fast to earth, and its most perfect works have still one foot of

clay. Genius claims kindred with the very workings of Nature herself, so

that a sunset shall seem like a quotation from Dante or Milton, and if

Shakespeare be read in the very presence of the sea itself, his verses

shall but seem nobler for the sublime criticism of ocean. Talent may

make friends for itself, but only genius can give to its creations the

divine power of winning love and veneration. Enthusiasm cannot cling to

what itself is unenthusiastic, nor will he ever have disciples who has

not himself impulsive zeal enough to be a disciple. Great wits are

allied to madness only inasmuch as they are possessed and carried away

by their demon, while talent keeps him, as Paracelsus did, securely

prisoned in the pommel of its sword. To the eye of genius, the veil of

the spiritual world is ever rent asunder, that it may perceive the

ministers of good and evil who throng continually around it. No man of

mere talent ever flung his inkstand at the devil.

When we say that Mr. Poe had genius, we do not mean to say that he has

produced evidence of the highest. But to say that he possesses it at all

is to say that he needs only zeal, industry, and a reverence for the

trust reposed in him, to achieve the proudest triumphs and the greenest

laurels. If we may believe the Longinuses and Aristotles of our

newspapers, we have quite too many geniuses of the loftiest order to

render a place among them at all desirable, whether for its hardness of

attainment or its seclusion. The highest peak of our Parnassus is,

according to these gentlemen, by far the most thickly settled portion of

the country, a circumstance which must make it an uncomfortable

residence for individuals of a poetical temperament, if love of solitude

be, as immemorial tradition asserts, a necessary part of their

idiosyncrasy.

Mr. Poe has two of the prime qualities of genius, a faculty of vigorous

yet minute analysis, and a wonderful fecundity of imagination. The first

of these faculties is as needful to the artist in words, as a knowledge

of anatomy is to the artist in colors or in stone. This enables him to

conceive truly, to maintain a proper relation of parts, and to draw a

correct outline, while the second groups, fills up, and colors. Both of

these Mr. Poe has displayed with singular distinctness in his prose

works, the last predominating in his earlier tales, and the first in his

later ones. In judging of the merit of an author, and assigning him his

niche among our household gods, we have a right to regard him from our

own point of view, and to measure him by our own standard. But, in

estimating the amount of power displayed in his works, we must be

governed by his own design, and, placing them by the side of his own

ideal, find how much is wanting. We differ from Mr. Poe in his opinions

of the objects of art. He esteems that object to be the creation of

Beauty, and perhaps it is only in the definition of that word that we

disagree with him. But in what we shall say of his writings, we shall

take his own standard as our guide. The temple of the god of song is

equally accessible from every side, and there is room enough in it for

all who bring offerings, or seek an oracle.

In his tales, Mr. Poe has chosen to exhibit his power chiefly in that

dim region which stretches from the very utmost limits of the probable

into the weird confines of superstition and unreality. He combines in a

very remarkable manner two faculties which are seldom found united; a

power of influencing the mind of the reader by the impalpable shadows of

mystery, and a minuteness of detail which does not leave a pin or a

button unnoticed. Both are, in truth, the natural results of the

predominating quality of his mind, to which we have before alluded,

analysis. It is this which distinguishes the artist. His mind at once

reaches forward to the effect to be produced. Having resolved to bring

about certain emotions in the reader, he makes all subordinate parts

tend strictly to the common centre. Even his mystery is mathematical to

his own mind. To him _x_ is a known quantity all along. In any picture

that he paints, he understands the chemical properties of all his

colors. However vague some of his figures may seem, however formless the

shadows, to him the outline is as clear and distinct as that of a

geometrical diagram. For this reason Mr. Poe has no sympathy with

_Mysticism_. The Mystic dwells _in_ the mystery, is enveloped with it;

it colors all his thoughts; it affects his optic nerve especially, and

the commonest things get a rainbow edging from it. Mr. Poe, on the other

hand, is a spectator _ab extrà_. He analyzes, he dissects, he watches

----with an eye serene,

The very pulse of the machine,

for such it practically is to him, with wheels and cogs and piston-rods,

all working to produce a certain end.

This analyzing tendency of his mind balances the poetical, and, by

giving him the patience to be minute, enables him to throw a wonderful

reality into his most unreal fancies. A monomania he paints with great

power. He loves to dissect one of these cancers of the mind, and to

trace all the subtle ramifications of its roots. In raising images of

horror, also, he has a strange success; conveying to us sometimes by a

dusky hint some terrible _doubt_ which is the secret of all horror. He

leaves to imagination the task of finishing the picture, a task to which

only she is competent.

For much imaginary work was there;

Conceit deceitful, so compact, so kind,

That for Achilles' image stood his spear

Grasped in an armed hand; himself behind

Was left unseen, save to the eye of mind.

Beside the merit of conception, Mr. Poe's writings have also that of

form. His style is highly finished, graceful and truly classical. It

would be hard to find a living author who had displayed such varied

powers. As an example of his style we would refer to one of his tales,

"The House of Usher," in the first volume of his "Tales of the Grotesque

and Arabesque." It has a singular charm for us, and we think that no one

could read it without being strongly moved by its serene and sombre

beauty. Had its author written nothing else, it would alone have been

enough to stamp him as a man of genius, and the master of a classic

style. In this tale occurs, perhaps, the most beautiful of his poems.

The great masters of imagination have seldom resorted to the vague and

the unreal as sources of effect. They have not used dread and horror

alone, but only in combination with other qualities, as means of

subjugating the fancies of their readers. The loftiest muse has ever a

household and fireside charm about her. Mr. Poe's secret lies mainly in

the skill with which he has employed the strange fascination of mystery

and terror. In this his success is so great and striking as to deserve

the name of art, not artifice. We cannot call his materials the noblest

or purest, but we must concede to him the highest merit of construction.

As a critic, Mr. Poe was aesthetically deficient. Unerring in his

analysis of dictions, metres, and plots, he seemed wanting in the

faculty of perceiving the profounder ethics of art. His criticisms are,

however, distinguished for scientific precision and coherence of logic.

They have the exactness, and at the same time, the coldness of

mathematical demonstrations. Yet they stand in strikingly refreshing

contrast with the vague generalisms and sharp personalities of the day.

If deficient in warmth, they are also without the heat of partizanship.

They are especially valuable as illustrating the great truth, too

generally overlooked, that analytic power is a subordinate quality of

the critic.

On the whole, it may be considered certain that Mr. Poe has attained an

individual eminence in our literature, which he will keep. He has given

proof of power and originality. He has done that which could only be

done once with success or safety, and the imitation or repetition of

which would produce weariness.

The Function of the Poet, and Other Essays · 第 44 / 52 题